Jimmy Church interviews 'DEET', a human hybrid

[Bill Ryan]

"DEET" = "Down to Earth ET". Don't laugh! There may be something here.

DEET, human name not given, is a 20 year old young woman, who's impressively articulate, smart, confident, sincere, and (it has to be said) cute. :) The show, Ep.1067, aired on 25 June 2019, and the video has been up a whole 12 months with 4 (four) views. Go figure.

There are several data points to take issue with, for sure, and as usual Jimmy Church doesn't ask the questions I think he should have. But it's undeniably both interesting and entertaining. I do recommend it.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyzb9t0SqhQ

[Mashika]

Because of how she describes some of the Aliens and situations, and knowing that the version we get is like not always the real one, so that people that comes back saying "i saw this" and then they describe the "produced" version that was distributed to mislead people, i think she may be a victim of some hyper-reality experiment.

Maybe she has seen something for real, but not exactly what she describes. If she just can't see now what's true and what came from the mixing of reality with the fake version of it that she believes she experienced, she discredits herself by putting out "facts" that are not real facts

So all truths she may have, can be easily discredited by pointing out the mistakes or "lies" that can be found on her story

???:shielddeflect:

[Bill Ryan]

Maybe she has seen something for real, but not exactly what she describes. If she just can't see now what's true and what came from the mixing of reality with the fake version of it that she believes she experienced, she discredits herself by putting out "facts" that are not real facts.
Interestingly, after about an hour and a half, she starts explaining some really tricky concepts concerning time, space and energy. She uses imaginative visual analogies that may or may not have any reality. But the models are intricate and ingenious, and I've sure never heard them before.

Yes, some of it really does sound like fantastic imagination. And there are some things that seem to make little sense and are hard to square with what I'd personally argue are known facts. But JC fires all kinds of questions at her and she doesn't have to think much when answering — and often, not at all. I'm sure she believes everything she's saying. :)

[Mashika]

Maybe she has seen something for real, but not exactly what she describes. If she just can't see now what's true and what came from the mixing of reality with the fake version of it that she believes she experienced, she discredits herself by putting out "facts" that are not real facts.
Interestingly, after about an hour and a half, she starts explaining some really tricky concepts concerning time, space and energy. She uses imaginative visual analogies that may or may not have any reality. But the models are intricate and ingenious, and I've sure never heard them before.

Yes, some of it really does sound like fantastic imagination. And there are some things that seem to make little sense and are hard to square with what I'd personally argue are known facts. But JC fires all kinds of questions at her and she doesn't have to think much when answering — and often, not at all. I'm sure she believes everything she's saying. :)

I believe she truly speaks from her truth, our problem will always be to figure out which parts are leading to the/are complete truths, and which ones are part of what was "inserted" so that she would wonder about not fully being capable of figuring it all out, and that things she said would not make full complete sense

I remember something about that kind of being the "insurance bit", so that if they decided to abandon her later on, she will just cycle forever on the same ideas until she fades away, incapable of escaping the reality enclosure she was put on

It is a :frusty: situation :)

:mmph:

:sherlock:

[Nasu]

I was only the 63 watcher / listener! I don't think I've ever been on a vid with such a low watch count, ever. She clearly believes what she says and she talks well, not seemingly overly educated in a traditional sense but definitely knows her subject matter intimately. Jimmy on the other hand comes across as a complete moron. I for one would be fascinated to hear her story properly from start to now. It would be so good if she was interviewed by someone with more gravitas and a more mature mental vocabulary..

Bill I'm looking at you.



Example of question:

"The greys don't listen to Van Halen?" - Jimmy Church









Common Bill, humanity can do better than this, if she's bogus you're the man to find out, give her a call, or a tweet, make it happen......x.... N

[Mashika]

I was only the 63 watcher / listener! I don't think I've ever been on a vid with such a low watch count, ever. She clearly believes what she says and she talks well, not seemingly overly educated in a traditional sense but definitely knows her subject matter intimately. Jimmy on the other hand comes across as a complete moron. It would be so good if she was interviewed by someone with a more gravitas and mature mental vocabulary.. Bill I'm looking at you.

"The greys don't listen to Van Halen?" - Jimmy Church


She said something about element 115, she got that one wrong, but as i said that could possibly be "inserted information" so that she can't help to talk about it and it ends up discrediting her in the case she goes rogue

Also the waffle ship stuff, more like "growing a ship", not molding it :)

If you can "grow" a ship, it will turns perfect in ways that you can interact with it, just like you interact with a horse while riding it, the more in sync you both are, the better the response and performance is, for both the horse and the person riding it

ETA:

Don't know but when she's trying to describe energy to move the ships, i think she may be trying to explain micro big bangs, is just that she doesn't have the idea of it. She can see it on her mind, but the words will come out all wrong no matter what

:)

[Nasu]

I was only the 63 watcher / listener! I don't think I've ever been on a vid with such a low watch count, ever. She clearly believes what she says and she talks well, not seemingly overly educated in a traditional sense but definitely knows her subject matter intimately. Jimmy on the other hand comes across as a complete moron. It would be so good if she was interviewed by someone with a more gravitas and mature mental vocabulary.. Bill I'm looking at you.

"The greys don't listen to Van Halen?" - Jimmy Church


She said something about element 115, she got that one wrong, but as i said that could possibly be "inserted information" so that she can't help to talk about it and it ends up discrediting her in the case she goes rogue

Also the waffle ship stuff, more like "growing a ship", not molding it :)

If you can "grow" a ship, it will turns perfect in ways that you can interact with it, just like you interact with a horse while riding it, the more in sync you both are, the better the response and performance is, for both the horse and the person riding it

:)

Regarding her analogy of the waffle maker. I thought it was an interesting engineering aside, a geek out on her part, if you like. I thought it made very good sense to make the hull out of one large part, if you could. As we do with yacht hulls. As for 115, it is theoretical but till now no one has been able to stabilize it in any way that it could be contained or transported, let alone utilized in some gadget. So in layman's terms it's possible but not doable......x.... N

[eagle0027]

Thnx for that Bill...certainly going to try to find more of her stuff.
Thats a young woman i would luv to spend time questioning.

[Mashika]

I was only the 63 watcher / listener! I don't think I've ever been on a vid with such a low watch count, ever. She clearly believes what she says and she talks well, not seemingly overly educated in a traditional sense but definitely knows her subject matter intimately. Jimmy on the other hand comes across as a complete moron. It would be so good if she was interviewed by someone with a more gravitas and mature mental vocabulary.. Bill I'm looking at you.

"The greys don't listen to Van Halen?" - Jimmy Church


She said something about element 115, she got that one wrong, but as i said that could possibly be "inserted information" so that she can't help to talk about it and it ends up discrediting her in the case she goes rogue

Also the waffle ship stuff, more like "growing a ship", not molding it :)

If you can "grow" a ship, it will turns perfect in ways that you can interact with it, just like you interact with a horse while riding it, the more in sync you both are, the better the response and performance is, for both the horse and the person riding it

:)

Regarding her analogy of the waffle maker. I thought it was an interesting engineering aside, a geek out on her part, if you like. I thought it made very good sense to make the hull out of one large part, if you could. As we do with yacht hulls. As for 115, it is theoretical but till now no one has been able to stabilize it in any way that it could be contained or transported, let alone utilized in some gadget. So in layman's terms it's possible but not doable......x.... N

The problem with molding space craft, is that those are not very flexible, or self healing, if it breaks, it breaks and the mission is doomed

IF you find a way to grow a ship, as in it can self heal and it regrow missing parts and be flexible enough to take damage and still continue to operate, then you have something you can use in unexpected situations/world/environments. That's the way to go, at some point humanity had the idea of creating stuff like that, in a single step, but we know better now, so either that's a wrong assumption that we don't have better tech right now, or it's also misinformation she got intended to discredit her if she were to speak up on her own

What we want for very deep space travel, is a salamander type of space ship, that can regrow a limb if it goes missing, without skipping a bit. We don't want them to be a reproduction of our way of living or tech, we want them to be self healing like a salamander. This is not news anymore, so yeah

[Mashika]

For the time stuff, and the paper sheet, let's imagine this

Say you have a universe, and inside of it, you create a smaller one, which is a "fork" of the original one you are standing on at that time, you can see an entire copy of your universe at the time you created the smaller one, but it so happens that you can modify a few things on it, careful not to break it or cause the bubble to explode in your face :) (let's say you put a pin on a specific moment of time and location) so..

If you can put a mark on it, and then you let that forked universe grow until it wraps all around and starts again, the next iteration of the copy will have that pin you placed on it, because it's a copy of the copy.. So now you can go there at the exact time and place, basically traveling back in time. Because the copy has all the information of the original. so now you have a "Google Universe" version of it

So, if you are living inside one of those embedded universes... and you figure out where the "pins" are, you can go there.. so to speak :)

[Mike]

Does she have any kind of keepsake from the ship? Clothing? A paperclip? A picture of the ship? A picture of soil impressions? Any witnesses to the events? Has she had regression therapy? Hypnosis? Any scoop marks or scars on her body? If yes, any pictures of those? Any pictures of the beings themselves? Any radiated soil? Etc

Not a party pooper post:)! I'm just curious. I listened to the first 10 mins or so and then skipped around a bit, looking for something tactile. Does she offer anything like that?

I notice she waffled slightly when asked very basic questions, like her age and where she lived at various times.

If I were Jimmy, I would have stopped her after she began to describe the other planet she lived on, and asked very specific, very probing questions about that planet. It would have quickly revealed her truthfulness I think. The problem with these types of interviews is that the interviewee posits so much fantastical stuff that the interviewer feels obliged to ask about every last bit of it in one relatively short interview.. so the interviewee has the luxury of being a bit vague and general about the details.

A much more appropriate way of doing it would be to focus on one or two things and go from there. One easy way to test her claims, for example, would be to have one 3 hour interview about her home planet, and nothing else. My guess is that she'd run out of material very quickly, or pretend to have some kind of cosmic amnesia about it all. One very obvious way to test her would be to have her read a page or 2 of a book and translate it into her native language. A million bucks says she couldn't do it!

[Mashika]

Does she have any kind of keepsake from the ship? Clothing? A paperclip? A picture of the ship? A picture of soil impressions? Any witnesses to the events? Has she had regression therapy? Hypnosis? Any scoop marks or scars on her body? If yes, any pictures of those? Any pictures of the beings themselves? Any radiated soil? Etc

Not a party pooper post:)! I'm just curious. I listened to the first 10 mins or so and then skipped around a bit, looking for something tactile. Does she offer anything like that?

She doesn't

However, if she's 20 and just some random normal girl, she sure knows, partially at least, of things i heard before from older friends in the space science area.

She just can't put the correct words out there because i don't think she has a scientific education background, but if you know a bit about those things, it immediately clicks

But who knows.. Maybe her dad is a scientist and she just picked it all up and is LARPing all around

[Strat]

Does she have any kind of keepsake from the ship? Clothing? A paperclip? A picture of the ship? A picture of soil impressions? Any witnesses to the events? Has she had regression therapy? Hypnosis? Any scoop marks or scars on her body? If yes, any pictures of those? Any pictures of the beings themselves? Any radiated soil? Etc

Not a party pooper post:)! I'm just curious. I listened to the first 10 mins or so and then skipped around a bit, looking for something tactile. Does she offer anything like that?

I notice she waffled slightly when asked very basic questions, like her age and where she lived at various times.

If I were Jimmy, I would have stopped her after she began to describe the other planet she lived on, and asked very specific, very probing questions about that planet. It would have quickly revealed her truthfulness I think. The problem with these types of interviews is that the interviewee posits so much fantastical stuff that the interviewer feels obliged to ask about every last bit of it in one relatively short interview.. so the interviewee has the luxury of being a bit vague and general about the details.

A much more appropriate way of doing it would be to focus on one or two things and go from there. One easy way to test her claims, for example, would be to have one 3 hour interview about her home planet, and nothing else. My guess is that she'd run out of material very quickly, or pretend to have some kind of cosmic amnesia about it all. One very obvious way to test her would be to have her read a page or 2 of a book and translate it into her native language. A million bucks says she couldn't do it!

Your tap dancing abilities are far beyond mine. I am seriously jealous of your ability to convey a message. I am the vinegar to your honey. I would love to interview these folks but it wouldn't go far till I'm slamming my hand on my desk and saying, "ok that's enough!" UFO's are real, aliens exist and human bull****ters are prevalent. The latter I just can't tolerate.

I am a 'Charles' worst nightmare (my posts are still on old Avalon, never believed him). Bill if you ever need a proverbial watchdog I am constantly here sniffing the air.

[RunningDeer]

I’m almost 2 hours into the video. I’ve downloaded it and may replay it later. DEET is a bright young lady, a natural teacher. I’ve not had luck finding other interviews. Makes me question why.


DEET - Down to Earth ET (https://jimmychurchradio.com/deet-the-down-to-earth-extraterrestrial-on-fade-to-black/)
https://i.imgur.com/bC2GXYf.jpg

[RunningDeer]

I’m almost 2 hours into the video. I’ve downloaded it and may replay it later. DEET is a bright young lady, a natural teacher. I’ve not had luck finding other interviews. Makes me question why.


DEET - Down to Earth ET (https://jimmychurchradio.com/deet-the-down-to-earth-extraterrestrial-on-fade-to-black/)
https://i.imgur.com/bC2GXYf.jpg

UPDATE: I’m at the part in the vid where Jimmy gives out her twitter account info:

DowntoEarthET @DowntoEt (https://twitter.com/DowntoEt)
Joined on February, 2019



I have reincarnated as a human/grey alien hybrid, being a former ET from a planet past Leo, called Osetutus(OH-sea-two-tUS). You can call me DEET, sup.

Here DowntoEt responds to a tweet:


1140392512936267776
https://twitter.com/DowntoEt/status/1140392512936267776

[RunningDeer]

I was only the 63 watcher / listener! I don't think I've ever been on a vid with such a low watch count, ever. She clearly believes what she says and she talks well,

I’m still left with the question, ”Why no follow-up interview from Jimmy Church (his suggestion more than once) or from others?

This explains why the viewer count is low. The vid in the OP (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyzb9t0SqhQ) is from a channel that only has 129 subscribers. On the FADE TO BLACK radio Youtube channel the episode (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_nJkUjd53Y) has 17,306 views, with 515 thumbs up/85 thumbs down. I surmise it’s a higher count from the listeners over @ his radio show.


https://i.imgur.com/AAIzSB9.jpg

http://paula.avalonlibrary.net/smilies/red-line.gif

Another thing is Episode 1067 doesn’t come up on Jimmy’s feed which effects the count. David Icke is Episode 1068 with 34K views. Check out the low numbers around the same time, so 17,303 views for DEETS is not to shabby.

UPDATE: This may be why. Jimmy has the interview listed as: Premium Episode Download @ www.jimmychurchradio.com (https://jimmychurchradio.com/?s=DEET%3A+Interview+of+an+ET+). That's unfortunate.


https://i.imgur.com/3BUS27c.jpg

[TomKat]

Does she have any kind of keepsake from the ship? Clothing? A paperclip? A picture of the ship? A picture of soil impressions? Any witnesses to the events? Has she had regression therapy? Hypnosis? Any scoop marks or scars on her body? If yes, any pictures of those? Any pictures of the beings themselves? Any radiated soil? Etc

Why would she need those things? I didn't get the impression she was trying to prove anything to the anyone. Physical artifacts are proof of a hoax, because the real ones are always confiscated.

[Mike]

Does she have any kind of keepsake from the ship? Clothing? A paperclip? A picture of the ship? A picture of soil impressions? Any witnesses to the events? Has she had regression therapy? Hypnosis? Any scoop marks or scars on her body? If yes, any pictures of those? Any pictures of the beings themselves? Any radiated soil? Etc

Why would she need those things? I didn't get the impression she was trying to prove anything to the anyone. Physical artifacts are proof of a hoax, because the real ones are always confiscated.


If she wasn't trying to prove anything to anyone then why would she bother appearing on the show?

I do see this attitude quite often: someone will willfully put themselves in the spotlight, say something fantastical, and then scoff at inquiries..all under this thinking that they have "no need to prove anything to anyone", that the skeptics' suspicion is "their problem", and so forth. I understand this is your thinking, and maybe not hers (or is it? i still have to listen to the rest of it) but I put it out there for the sake of argument

She may sound casual about it all, or down to earth, but I'm not listening to what she's saying so much as what she's doing. She has a twitter handle that advertises her claims. And she just appeared on one of the biggest paranormal radio shows in the world. Make no mistake - she's looking for attention.

And once you do those things, you're fair game. And you're obliged to provide some kind of evidence, or at the very least answer some very difficult questions. That is, if you want to be taken seriously.

[Sérénité]

No idea what to make of this, but it was an enjoyable listen. She sounds very much like Teal Swann. I wish I was as well articulated as her at 20 years old!

Some of the things she said was so simple yet you’d never even consider it normally, yet made so much sense...like the Greys being taken by music as they don’t have it/listen to it themselves.
I guess when you’re a telepathic by nature, music wouldn’t have the same effect on your senses. Something I’d never even thought of before. If she’s not genuine then she needs to put her silver tongue to good use, it will lead her well.

[EFO]

I followed Mr. Ryan lead to listen the interview after 1:30 hrs. regarding DEET explanations about time energy and space and I'm totally agree with DEET that time is not linear (and thanks to her testimony,at least her,confirm my knowledge) as being a cube.

I was raised from different points from something that looks like ground or space in transparent coloured liquid bubbles after once I was in my own time bubble and because of the happening of the bubble I "found" myself face to face with me in the fourth or fifth grade and talking with me at that age.

In that event I understand that time is not linear,but a sphere.And is a sphere because,no matter how long a human is living,we don;t have the capacity to remember every second of our life and having this short life span on Earth,time also is short.Time sphere is like Earth:sitting in one point and having an average height of 1.8 m/6 feet,the Earth looks flat,but if we would have a a height of 180000 m/600000 feet,than the Earth start to looked curved like a sphere.I hope I explained well the analogy.

To explain and make people understand what's "up there" and "how things works" we need a totally new vocabulary.

In any case,at least everyone on Earth has its own time bubble and not a time line as it said,but what can I say:dogmas,prejudices,constrains and conditionalities are killing real free thinking...

[Mashika]

I followed Mr. Ryan lead to listen the interview after 1:30 hrs. regarding DEET explanations about time energy and space and I'm totally agree with DEET that time is not linear (and thanks to her testimony,at least her,confirm my knowledge) as being a cube.

I was raised from different points from something that looks like ground or space in transparent coloured liquid bubbles after once I was in my own time bubble and because of the happening of the bubble I "found" myself face to face with me in the fourth or fifth grade and talking with me at that age.

In that event I understand that time is not linear,but a sphere.And is a sphere because,no matter how long a human is living,we don;t have the capacity to remember every second of our life and having this short life span on Earth,time also is short.Time sphere is like Earth:sitting in one point and having an average height of 1.8 m/6 feet,the Earth looks flat,but if we would have a a height of 180000 m/600000 feet,than the Earth start to looked curved like a sphere.I hope I explained well the analogy.

To explain and make people understand what's "up there" and "how things works" we need a totally new vocabulary.

In any case,at least everyone on Earth has its own time bubble and not a time line as it said,but what can I say:dogmas,prejudices,constrains and conditionalities are killing real free thinking...

I don't understand. You said you agree time was a cube, then you say it is a sphere? Did i miss read that?



time is not linear (and thanks to her testimony,at least her,confirm my knowledge) as being a cube.


Time is not really any of those things, but yeah maybe a sphere could be a better way to interpret it, yet time wraps around itself, or more like the "reality" does, so that you can get back and wait for it, then wait for it, then it happens again

[RunningDeer]

I followed Mr. Ryan lead to listen the interview after 1:30 hrs. regarding DEET explanations about time energy and space and I'm totally agree with DEET that time is not linear (and thanks to her testimony,at least her,confirm my knowledge) as being a cube.
Partial transcript on the topic of time and cube begins @1:37:59 (https://youtu.be/xyzb9t0SqhQ?t=5876):




Jimmy: Okay now and staying on this, the other aspect to all of this is the clocks and time. I need you to help me out. Is time linear?

DEET: Now that's a good question and I will answer it this way. So imagine that there's a line on a piece of paper. Just a line. And suddenly this line starts moving upwards off of the piece of paper and you start to see lines coming out of this line.

And what you realize is that it's actually a cube rising from the surface of the paper that looks like a line. Just imagine it. It's actually cube. Just imagine it. What I'm saying about time is that to us it looks linear. And there's definitely a linear aspect to it. However, time is not only linear.

Jimmy: How are the coordinates done. In other words, it's not it's not a 3d mapping system of coordinates right you know you know depth. It’s a time. It would have to be time.

DEET: Yeah, so I’ll put it this way. So going back to that paper analogy. Right? Like the people being pulled it into the bowl. So you can imagine how races keep track of time. Imagine that I take that piece of paper from the bowl and I put it in a sewing machine and so the sewing machine periodically punches back and forth through the piece of paper as I’m sliding through. That’s kind of how the cloth works that they have in different ships and different civilizations. They basically have a mechanism that regularly marks a certain aspect of time but also cross-checks it to make sure that it's the specific area they think they're looking at.

So time is, it’s kind of like I guess you could describe it…what I’ve been using, it's like this giant sheet of paper moving through the universe. And so in order to understand where they are in that piece of paper, they punch a hole in it somewhere. Write down the specific properties of that holding points because every single place where they punch a hole has a different property. It’s not a huge difference but there's a slight detectable difference. But when they want to know if they're on the right time, like if they're not a hundred years later where they're supposed to be or 100 years earlier, they sort of punch a hole in that piece of paper. And look at the information in that piece of paper.

Jimmy: So then you are going to a place in time? {snip} …I understand the line concept. I see the line coming up. It’s going into a cube. The line would go into this spot somewhere in the cube three dimensionally in space. And then where it stops that is a time and that time would be the place and your destination?

DEET: Not exactly. Okay so going back to the stitches analogy. Let’s say that I take this piece of paper of time and I put in a stitch right at the coordinate of Earth at this time. Right? So let's say that when I put this stitch through time, the thread I'm using turns yellow. Okay? So then let's say that I go way over to Osetutus (OH-sea-two-tUS) way over to past “wheel” (spelling? a name of another planet). I'll go straight to that planet, and then I'll punch hole in time right there. And if I’m punching a hole at the same time that is on earth, it'll also turn yellow. The thread. Once I punch it through there, it will turn yellow. But if I overshot and I go to Osetutus (OH-sea-two-tUS) and it's been 100 years on earth then that thread will turn a different color. Let’s say purple for this example.

Jimmy: I almost had it. I think I get it. Okay, so if you overshot or arrived early, what happens to your physical body?

DEET: Your physical body would be fine for most methods and space travel. Because every race kind of looks a little different. Sometimes your body would be fine because the ship distorted space and time. So you basically moved in this isolated bubble all the way to your location. The time starts happening to you again at that location but space doesn’t really mind that you basically skip a bunch of it and time doesn't really mind. That’s basically how it works. so you would just end up there a hundred years younger than you should be if you overshot.

[TomKat]

Does she have any kind of keepsake from the ship? Clothing? A paperclip? A picture of the ship? A picture of soil impressions? Any witnesses to the events? Has she had regression therapy? Hypnosis? Any scoop marks or scars on her body? If yes, any pictures of those? Any pictures of the beings themselves? Any radiated soil? Etc

Why would she need those things? I didn't get the impression she was trying to prove anything to the anyone. Physical artifacts are proof of a hoax, because the real ones are always confiscated.


If she wasn't trying to prove anything to anyone then why would she bother appearing on the show?

I do see this attitude quite often: someone will willfully put themselves in the spotlight, say something fantastical, and then scoff at inquiries..all under this thinking that they have "no need to prove anything to anyone", that the skeptics' suspicion is "their problem", and so forth. I understand this is your thinking, and maybe not hers (or is it? i still have to listen to the rest of it) but I put it out there for the sake of argument

She may sound casual about it all, or down to earth, but I'm not listening to what she's saying so much as what she's doing. She has a twitter handle that advertises her claims. And she just appeared on one of the biggest paranormal radio shows in the world. Make no mistake - she's looking for attention.

And once you do those things, you're fair game. And you're obliged to provide some kind of evidence, or at the very least answer some very difficult questions. That is, if you want to be taken seriously.

It's testimony. Last time I checked, testimony doesn't require physical evidence.

[Innocent Warrior]

I feel like I’ve become a bit of a Mike contrarian recently so I resisted arguing this point, but since TomKat has I’ll chime in. :)

When she discussed the necessity of disclosure coming from the people, she described the kind of people she’s hoping to hear from, which is other people who are familiar with the information she discusses, or at least some of it.

She’s a legitimate experiencer and experiencers recognise other legitimate experiencers, no evidence required. Regardless of what you’ve discovered and live, like being a hybrid or some other personal endeavour, that world is familiar to all experiencers. When I say world I mean more than just a kind of landscape, and it’s not another world, it’s just an extension of this world/reality that requires some conditioning and greater sensitivity and awareness than is typical in individuals at this time to consciously perceive and experience. This world shapes and conditions experiencers to perceive, relate, communicate, view etc. in an easily recognisable way that’s familiar to each other.

Imagine you had spent some time exploring another planet and came back and another person claimed to have done the same. You would know their claim was true when they spent hours discussing it, going into many details, while not once contradicting what you experienced on that planet, also, you would recognise the ways in which this person’s perspective, attitude etc had been affected in precisely the same way as your own in regards to that particular experience. It’s impossible to know what to make up and precisely how to deliver it, without messing it up once, if you’re lying. I’m talking many, tiny details that non-experiencers could never think of.

I didn’t listen to the entire interview, so I don’t know if she intends to attempt to convince the wider population and try to provide evidence, but she seems too bright and would likely know better. It requires direct experience to remove all doubt, so the most productive approach would be to begin disclosure by guiding others to achieve direct contact for themselves.

As for the hybrid part, not that far out. Really. No flags were raised for me when she discussed details about that either, however, I haven’t had a lot of direct experience, that I’m conscious of, with ETs.

[Mike]

Bump.

Any new revelations or interviews with her?

[RunningDeer]

Bump.

Any new revelations or interviews with her?



DowntoEarthET (https://twitter.com/DowntoEt)- (DEET)
@DowntoEt

I have reincarnated as a human/grey alien hybrid, being a former ET from a planet past Leo, called Osetutus(OH-sea-two-tUS). You can call me DEET, sup.

I got sucked into the DEET Twitter vortex. She’s added a lot of tweets and is interested in animals especially cats of all kinds.


source (https://twitter.com/JohnOberg/status/1149822821696233473)
https://twitter.com/JohnOberg/status/1149822821696233473

source (https://twitter.com/BgSnezana/status/1156279224942170112)
https://twitter.com/BgSnezana/status/1156279224942170112

source (https://twitter.com/ChaseThePlayBoy/status/1148044793202839552)
https://twitter.com/ChaseThePlayBoy/status/1148044793202839552