Sérénité
22nd March 2021, 14:07
My gut instinct from the start was there is something not right with these tests.
Is it because the man who designed them, Kari Mulis states before his unfortunate death back in summer 2019 that ‘if you search hard enough you’ll find anything in anyone’.
Meaning why use them?
Is it to drive up false positives which in turn then give governments around the world an excuse to continue lockdowns?
Or are the tests themselves nefarious in some way.
Ok I’m trying to hold myself from falling down the proverbial rabbit hole here, but we have seen reports that nano tech is alive and functioning and can be seen as tiny micro dots on the end of a q-tip.
I’m not sure I’d go that deep with it, but you never know...
But it got me thinking after watching them shove an 8” swab up a tiny child’s nose, what damage is that causing? And what’s on the end of it?
And why does it needs to be thrust all the way up to the blood/brain barrier to work if we are being asked to wear a mask as the virus is airborne? Should a quick lower nasal test or saliva not work?!
So after one of my children being given a test from college to do at home, I took the chance to check it out.
It’s all pretty basic looking apart from the fact it very discreetly using periodic table coding that the q-tip is soaked and coated in Ethylene Oxide.
So I done a little research and found various people had found out the same.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3552eed9-13bb-4df2-90c7-415cb45f176b
A portion of the above published article reads;
Why Ethylene Oxide is So Toxic (and a know carcinogen)
According to OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration), Ethylene Oxide (ETO) is a human-made, highly toxic, colorless, flammable gas that, at room temperature, produces a sweet odor.
Ethylene Oxide gases are hazardous substances utilized in the production of ethylene glycol used in numerous products, including pharmaceuticals, polyurethane foam, adhesives, detergents, textiles, anti-freeze, and solvents.
Even minimal exposure to highly toxic Ethylene Oxide gas can create an increased risk of adverse health effects, including blurred vision, difficulty with breathing, breast cancer, and nervous system conditions.
The medical industry uses ETO-derived ethylene glycol manufactured in commercial sterilization facilities to sterilize medical equipment, medical devices, surgical instruments, and other medical products.
Unfortunately, the ethylene oxide sterilization process, storage, transfer, and handling can cause a toxic workplace if the employee is injured through skin contact or air pollution with both ethylene glycol and ETO.
ETO – A Known Carcinogenic
The United States International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies the harmful chemical ETO as carcinogenic. Recent evidence by the EPA revealed that Ethylene Oxide exposure through inhalation could elevate the potential risk of developing lymphohematopoietic cancers like lymphocytic leukemia, myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
To ensure safety, state regulators require employers to take numerous actions to ensure occupational safety when chemical plant employees are exposed to permissible levels of ETO and other hazardous chemicals.
So what is a permissible level of contact with Ethylene Oxide?
I’ve searched this but cannot find it. Maybe someone knows?
And how much of it is present on the tests?
If our children are having the tests, almost mandatory inflicted twice weekly at school and college, for an unspecified length of time...would we see a build up of Ethylene Oxide occurring?
My child refused to be tested and said she would do it herself. She refused to do it up her nose and so was advised she must run the q-tip all over her tonsils and as far back in her throat as she could...
It seems I’m not the only concerned parent as I find this:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ethylene_oxide_in_connection_wit
Dear Department for Education,
This request is in relation to the use of the Innova lateral flow test (the “LFT”) being used across schools in the UK.
We are in receipt of correspondence from Innova confirming that the swab used in the LFTs is sterilised by ethylene oxide. Given the known toxicity and potential carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide, we are concerned by this.
Under the ‘Freedom of Information Act 2000’, we request disclosure of the following:
- information as to what, if any, independent tests have been carried out to check for any residues of ethylene oxide on a random sample of swabs;
- information as to what, if any, assessments have been conducted to ensure that the invasive use of these swabs for children is safe?
I understand that, under the Act, I am entitled to a response within 20 working days of your receipt of this request.
Some parts of the request may be easier to answer than others. Should this be the case, I request that you release information as soon as possible as it becomes available. If my request is denied in whole, or in part, I ask that you justify all decisions to deny disclosure by reference to specific exemptions of the Act.
I will expect you to disclose all non-exempt material that is within the scope of this request. I reserve the right to appeal your decision to withhold any information or to charge excessive fees.
I would prefer to receive the information electronically at the email address submitted to you as part of this request.
Yours faithfully
Molly Kingsley,
UsforThem
This was logged as freedom of information act on the 15th March 2021, as of yet no response.
Just throwing it out there to see if I’m being overly paranoid? Has anyone with a scientific/chemical health and safety background any further info on this compounds safety for what is potentially a regular and continued administration into our youths bodies very close if not breaking the blood/brain barrier and lower throat? (and all else having the test)
Is it because the man who designed them, Kari Mulis states before his unfortunate death back in summer 2019 that ‘if you search hard enough you’ll find anything in anyone’.
Meaning why use them?
Is it to drive up false positives which in turn then give governments around the world an excuse to continue lockdowns?
Or are the tests themselves nefarious in some way.
Ok I’m trying to hold myself from falling down the proverbial rabbit hole here, but we have seen reports that nano tech is alive and functioning and can be seen as tiny micro dots on the end of a q-tip.
I’m not sure I’d go that deep with it, but you never know...
But it got me thinking after watching them shove an 8” swab up a tiny child’s nose, what damage is that causing? And what’s on the end of it?
And why does it needs to be thrust all the way up to the blood/brain barrier to work if we are being asked to wear a mask as the virus is airborne? Should a quick lower nasal test or saliva not work?!
So after one of my children being given a test from college to do at home, I took the chance to check it out.
It’s all pretty basic looking apart from the fact it very discreetly using periodic table coding that the q-tip is soaked and coated in Ethylene Oxide.
So I done a little research and found various people had found out the same.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3552eed9-13bb-4df2-90c7-415cb45f176b
A portion of the above published article reads;
Why Ethylene Oxide is So Toxic (and a know carcinogen)
According to OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration), Ethylene Oxide (ETO) is a human-made, highly toxic, colorless, flammable gas that, at room temperature, produces a sweet odor.
Ethylene Oxide gases are hazardous substances utilized in the production of ethylene glycol used in numerous products, including pharmaceuticals, polyurethane foam, adhesives, detergents, textiles, anti-freeze, and solvents.
Even minimal exposure to highly toxic Ethylene Oxide gas can create an increased risk of adverse health effects, including blurred vision, difficulty with breathing, breast cancer, and nervous system conditions.
The medical industry uses ETO-derived ethylene glycol manufactured in commercial sterilization facilities to sterilize medical equipment, medical devices, surgical instruments, and other medical products.
Unfortunately, the ethylene oxide sterilization process, storage, transfer, and handling can cause a toxic workplace if the employee is injured through skin contact or air pollution with both ethylene glycol and ETO.
ETO – A Known Carcinogenic
The United States International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies the harmful chemical ETO as carcinogenic. Recent evidence by the EPA revealed that Ethylene Oxide exposure through inhalation could elevate the potential risk of developing lymphohematopoietic cancers like lymphocytic leukemia, myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
To ensure safety, state regulators require employers to take numerous actions to ensure occupational safety when chemical plant employees are exposed to permissible levels of ETO and other hazardous chemicals.
So what is a permissible level of contact with Ethylene Oxide?
I’ve searched this but cannot find it. Maybe someone knows?
And how much of it is present on the tests?
If our children are having the tests, almost mandatory inflicted twice weekly at school and college, for an unspecified length of time...would we see a build up of Ethylene Oxide occurring?
My child refused to be tested and said she would do it herself. She refused to do it up her nose and so was advised she must run the q-tip all over her tonsils and as far back in her throat as she could...
It seems I’m not the only concerned parent as I find this:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ethylene_oxide_in_connection_wit
Dear Department for Education,
This request is in relation to the use of the Innova lateral flow test (the “LFT”) being used across schools in the UK.
We are in receipt of correspondence from Innova confirming that the swab used in the LFTs is sterilised by ethylene oxide. Given the known toxicity and potential carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide, we are concerned by this.
Under the ‘Freedom of Information Act 2000’, we request disclosure of the following:
- information as to what, if any, independent tests have been carried out to check for any residues of ethylene oxide on a random sample of swabs;
- information as to what, if any, assessments have been conducted to ensure that the invasive use of these swabs for children is safe?
I understand that, under the Act, I am entitled to a response within 20 working days of your receipt of this request.
Some parts of the request may be easier to answer than others. Should this be the case, I request that you release information as soon as possible as it becomes available. If my request is denied in whole, or in part, I ask that you justify all decisions to deny disclosure by reference to specific exemptions of the Act.
I will expect you to disclose all non-exempt material that is within the scope of this request. I reserve the right to appeal your decision to withhold any information or to charge excessive fees.
I would prefer to receive the information electronically at the email address submitted to you as part of this request.
Yours faithfully
Molly Kingsley,
UsforThem
This was logged as freedom of information act on the 15th March 2021, as of yet no response.
Just throwing it out there to see if I’m being overly paranoid? Has anyone with a scientific/chemical health and safety background any further info on this compounds safety for what is potentially a regular and continued administration into our youths bodies very close if not breaking the blood/brain barrier and lower throat? (and all else having the test)