The UAP Task Force: is this 'disclosure'?

[aoibhghaire]

UFO sleuths make extraordinary discoveries; Congress should take note

Congress is set to hold the first public hearing on UFOs in more than 50 years. Government transparency — long overdue — is at the top of the agenda.

The million-dollar question is whether the U.S. government will admit that UFOs demonstrate extraordinary technology. And why shouldn’t it?

Thus, the question before Congress is simple: If so many former officials can state that UFOs demonstrate extraordinary capabilities while, at the same time, members of the public can independently verify these statements, why has the government not admitted as much?

https://thehill.com/opinion/3488406-ufo-sleuths-make-extraordinary-discoveries-congress-should-take-note/

[aoibhghaire]

This is a House hearing. Perhaps, there will next be a Senate hearing in which the Senate Intel Committee will subpoena the AF chief. Since the AF is in control of Nellis Test & Training Range likely accompanies being more directly related to what happened in Area S4 and similar. I suppose that they've had been involved in too many advanced research programs on the (we know what they are level) and for now prefer to avoid the limelight, to avoid having to answer Qs that would lead them to reveal too much, at least in this initial stage.

Also, recent interesting comments by Lue Elizonda @ Time: 1.05.40 (202) The Unexplained With Howard Hughes | 15-May-22 - Part 1 - YouTube. Its mainly Lue's background that we probably have heard thousand times.

However, Part 2 goes into more pertinent details in particular when we have exhausted all the possibilities we are left with an unknown intelligence. Part 2 and part 3 are mainly listeners questions which some of them are really good ones.

The hearing may be at a juncture where the Senate has to accept that we are dealing with a non human intelligence be it extraterrestrial/interdimensional dynamics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vhmr2Eah654

[aoibhghaire]

The movement characteristics, so often mentioned, (besides the ancient history of the phenomenon), is perhaps logically going to force more official statements that finally admit that some UAP most likely are not built in a homo sapiens country. Some SCU scientists speak of a range of 100-5000 gs of acceleration but what about the "instant acceleration" mentioned by TTSA (rather than 100 or 5000 gs)?

The non-human hypothesis should be almost inevitably mentioned (whether the UAP intelligences live in facilities inside the crust of the earth or in the Moon or a space station or come from deep space and even other (physical) "dimensions") especially once the authorities get evidence and declarations that at least some UAP cannot be built by current homo sapiens tech.

[aoibhghaire]

Live Congressional UFO-UAP Hearing May 17th 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSDweUbGBow

The hearing has demonstrated again how amazing how little they knew! After so much evidence and research! They want to start from scratch, don't they? If Mr Brady and Mr. Moultrie are not well informed about major cases, who is? Who really controls the research?

If much of what Luis Elizondo said and what abduction research and Ufology has is credible and solid, then Mr. Brady and Mr. Moultrie (who appear to be sincere) do not know much. Then who does? Who has operational control over retro engineering, human-non human communication research, UAP and biological material, MILABS, previous UFO research programs.

Civilian research and communication become even more important. Not just relying on or placing our bets on political, military, or even large academic institutions.

It therefore confirms every pre-hearing interview that The Pentagon never sends anyone up to Capital Hill who might slip and tell the truth. Therefore this is not a surprise.

[aoibhghaire]

Christopher Mellon expected more out of it.

Tweet
Christopher K. Mellon
@ChrisKMellon

“That was a frustrating hearing as well as a reminder both of how far we’ve come and how far we still have to go.”

On one hand Mellon has a very limited, non-history association with the topic. Never set your expectations too high to avoid disappointment. On the other hand, I expected a lack of substance and that is what we observed.

However, I’m not despondent with all this session which really proved is that we now know that - THEY DO KNOW - Brady is a liar and Moultrie came off sensible if not totally reliable. implying he's wearing hand-cuffs and has been given his marching orders - it's only the overture. They BOTH know the origins are off-world.

If they admitted it ALL today - war in the Ukraine, Putin, the pandemic, abortion issues, the Supreme Court, bad health care, female genital mutilation, radicalism, domestic terrorism, Jan 6th Hearings in June etc. etc. would be on the news - yes - but AFTER the weather.

The US cannot afford to add to the chaos - at least not yet - right now.

The pressure to hold this hearing was/is enormous. I’m hopeful - the panel questioners were fully prepared with the right questions - some missed the mark but Schiff, Gallagher and Welch were spot on yet too polite. This is disappointing but never-the-less a required first huge step.

Don't also forget - this is NOT the USGOV's issue - it is THE PEOPLE'S ISSUE - WE OWN IT - NOT THEM.

[aoibhghaire]

If neither Moultrie nor Brady know or have authority, who are those that really control the most advanced information? And, is it a legal arrangement?

The US was in a cold war before, and representatives always said the same thing or, at any rate, tried to minimize the issue. But they have almost always said the same thing. Since the 1950s: "we don't know what they are." However, to me, neither Brady nor Moultrie came across as knowing that they are ET or being given their marching orders not to admit this. They came across as new initiates on the block.

Rather, it looks as though the ones that truly know and control the advanced research are using these two mostly uninformed high-level officials to reestablish the old narrative:

That phenomenon is real and that they don't know what it is. Like trying to start (again) from square one. If this is so, the legality of who actually knows and why not even Moultrie nor Brady are in the loop is a big issue.

We may not accept or understand their slow pace but we have no control over it at a US governmental level. As I said - this is our issue - it belongs to us and we are the ones responsible for disclosure and awareness.

The US Gov’t does not need another threat scenario or more chaos - that is one of the reasons why they drag their feet. Unfortunately - they know the song but we have the lyrics…

[Kryztian]

Live Congressional UFO-UAP Hearing May 17th 2022

aSDweUbGBow


Probably the best question was from Rep. Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin who asked them about the Admiral Wilson leak. Predictably, the response was effectively "No sir, never heard of it." The most appropriate follow up question would have been "REALLY? You are in charge of national security on the UAP issue and you've never heard of the Wilson document leak???? Give me a break!!!"

At least Gallagher followed up with a brief explanation of what that leak document leak was about, and that is now in the Congressional record.

[aoibhghaire]

Mellon: Government’s inability to explain flying objects strengthens ‘alien hypothesis” – The Hill
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/592869-mellon-governments-inability-to-explain-flying-objects-strengthens-alien/

This is a must read article about the May 17, 2022 US UAP Hearing in Washington DC.

It provides an excellent context in order to fully understand where the hearing committee members made major errors, how it was successful - in part and where it must go next.

This article has been read by Captain Robert Salas who will be in Brazil later this month to testify. Robert Salas' public views and actions have been presented to the public on the nuclear issue and his role in keeping it the public eye. In addition representatives from ICER will be making the major submissions from a global perspective to the Brazilian government.

Hopefully the Brazilian Hearing Committee won’t make the same errors.
It will be interesting on the position of the Brazilian government should take publicly on the US Hearing.

[Bill Ryan]

And an interesting partial step towards 'disclosure' from the Russians. :thumbsup: The source is The Epoch Times (https://www.theepochtimes.com/extraterrestrial-intelligent-life-could-account-for-some-ufo-sightings-russian-space-chief_4527943.html) (behind a login wall), with emphasis added by Zero Hedge.

https://zerohedge.com/geopolitical/extraterrestrial-intelligent-life-could-account-some-ufo-sightings-russian-space-chief

Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life Could Account For Some UFO Sightings: Russian Space Chief

Dmitry Rogozin, the director-general of Russia’s space agency Roscosmos, said that some sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), colloquially referred to as UFOs, could be attributable to extraterrestrial intelligent life.

https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_mobile/public/inline-images/Rogozin-1200x791-700x420.jpg?itok=Sc-Ms_CA
Dmitry Rogozin, the head of the Russian space agency Roscosmos, in Baikonur, Kazakhstan, on Oct. 11, 2018.

Rogozin said in a Russian televised interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00-kR3MmSmw), aired on June 11, that the Russian Academy of Sciences had been investigating and gathering information about UFO sightings (https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-ufo-sightings). About 99.9 percent of the sightings were determined to be atmospheric or other physical phenomena and were unrelated to any kind of potentially intelligent life, he said.

“But we accept that such phenomena could exist,” Rogozin also noted, according to a translation by Russian state-owned news agency Sputnik (https://sputniknews.com/20220611/russian-space-agency-chief-doesnt-rule-out-aliens-arent-already-studying-humanity-like-microbes-1096220247.html).

He also said he has read and viewed reports by Soviet test-pilot veterans, about what they witnessed during flights in the 1970s.

“What we’re talking about usually took place during the first test fights,” he said, according to a translation by state-controlled media outlet RT (https://www.rt.com/russia/557012-space-agency-chief-ufo-aliens/). He said he had also received similar information from the United States’ space agency NASA, the outlet reported.

The Russian space agency chief acknowledged that some people support the idea that human beings may be the objects of observation by other intelligent life forms, similar to how humans study microbes.

Rogozin’s comments come about a month after a public U.S. congressional hearing was held on UFOs, the first such hearing in over 50 years (https://www.theepochtimes.com/house-panel-to-hold-first-public-hearing-on-ufos-in-decades_4459596.html).

Scott Bray, the deputy director of Naval Intelligence, showed lawmakers two videos of UFOs (https://www.theepochtimes.com/ufo-hearing-pentagon-shows-declassified-footage-of-flying-spherical-object_4472660.html) but said he did not have an explanation for the objects seen in the videos.

“There are a small handful [of events] in which there are flight characteristics or signature management that we can’t explain with the data we have,” he said (https://www.theepochtimes.com/rare-us-congressional-ufo-hearing-lacks-transparency-lawmaker_4474093.html). “Those are obviously the ones that are of most interest to us.”

The hearing came after a nine-page report (pdf (https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf)) released in June 2021 said that a designated task force within the Pentagon, the UAP Task Force, identified 144 UFO sightings from 2004 to 2021 but could only explain one of them. Bray said that since the release of that preliminary assessment, the UAP Task Force database “has now grown to contain approximately 400 reports.”

Bray noted that some of the reports involved incidents where U.S. military aircraft picked up radio frequency energy from the UAPs, but none of these detections suggested that they were “non-terrestrial in origin.” He did not comment in the hearing about whether any of the remaining reports suggested evidence of extraterrestrial life (https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-extraterrestrial-life-2).

Select Republican lawmakers were vocal in criticizing the hearing, and alleged that Democrats were trying to distract from tangible issues facing Americans (https://www.theepochtimes.com/democrats-ufo-hearings-are-a-distraction-rep-mullin_4474757.html) such as inflation and a declining oil reserve; and that the Pentagon was withholding information (https://www.theepochtimes.com/rare-us-congressional-ufo-hearing-lacks-transparency-lawmaker_4474093.html) from Americans and wasn’t providing “real answers to serious questions.”

The public hearing was followed by a private session of the committee when lawmakers could hear classified information.

When asked (https://www.c-span.org/video/?520133-1/hearing-government-investigation-ufos) at the public hearing about whether the United States has any sensors underwater in the ocean to detect submerged UFOs, Ronald Moultrie, the Pentagon’s top intelligence official, did not respond to the question but said the matter would be “more appropriately addressed in [the] closed session.”

[Kryztian]

China says it may have detected aliens, then deletes report
By Natalie O'Neill ~ June 15, 2022

https://nypost.com/2022/06/15/china-says-it-may-have-detected-aliens-then-deletes-report/
(article best read from link includes photos, links and video)

There’s something out there — maybe.

China’s science ministry said this week that it picked up signs of alien life on the world’s largest radio telescope — then appeared to quickly delete a report about the discovery.

The country’s powerful Sky Eye telescope detected electromagnetic signals of possible civilizations on other planets, according to a report published Tuesday in Science and Technology Daily, the official newspaper of China’s Ministry of Science and Technology.

“[There were] several cases of possible technological traces and extraterrestrial civilizations from outside the earth,” the report said.

The team of researchers, headed by the Beijing Normal University, said the mysterious frequencies were unlike anything they’d previously encountered and were investigating further, according to the report.

But the report had apparently been removed from the newspaper’s website by Wednesday — even as the news began trending on the nation’s popular social network site, Weibo, along with other media outlets, according to TIME.com

It was not immediately clear why the article had been yanked from the website.

But Zhang Tonjie, chief scientist of the university’s extraterrestrial civilization search team, was quoted in the report saying the signals could have been radio interference.

“The possibility that the suspicious signal is some kind of radio interference is also very high, and it needs to be further confirmed and ruled out. This may be a long process,” said Zhang.

The 500-meter, single-dish Sky Eye launched in southwestern Guizhou province in September 2020 with the primary goal of detecting life on other planets.

In 2020, researchers also detected two sets of suspicious signals along with a signal earlier this year linked to so-called “exoplanet targets,” Zhang said, according to the report.

The latest research was also conducted by the National Astronomical Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the University of California, Berkeley.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/15/china-says-it-may-have-detected-aliens-then-deletes-report/

(article best read from link includes photos, links and video)

[aoibhghaire]

WHY DID REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF ADDRESS US CONGRESS INTEREST IN UFO's AT SEATTLE TOWN HALL?

On July 16th, 2022 Adam Schiff gave this response at a Town Hall session in Seattle to a question from the audience about UFO's.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlLdK8-npP8

See background on this issue and Schiff's participation in US Congressional Hearing on UAP (UFO's): HERE

[aoibhghaire]

Will new NASA study move the needle on UFO research?

This is clearly the first step. They are looking for data from civilians as well as from government. They will not be working with classified data and will make everything transparent to the public. This should stimulate additional scientific investigation, and it will greatly help lift the stigma even further within the scientific community."

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/techandscience/will-new-nasa-study-move-the-needle-on-ufo-research/ar-AAZHtlk?rc=1&ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=60c9c7c154a34737dddbbb981cdf8643

[aoibhghaire]

Building on the December 2021 enactment of the unprecedented Gillibrand-Rubio-Gallego law dealing with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP, or UFOs), the congressional armed services and intelligence committees are now pushing forward with new legislative requirements to press the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community to accelerate their so-far sluggish implementation of the 2021 law.

The new proposals also contain an array of mechanisms to probe for hidden or forgotten data on UFOs (AKA "unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena," UAP) that government components or contractors may have gathered since 1947.

https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/probes-for-hidden-government-ufo-data-proposed-in-defense-and-intelligence-bills-now-advancing-in-congress-with-bipartisan-backing/

[aoibhghaire]

US Government House votes to make it easier to report UFOs.

The House on Wednesday voted to create a secure government system for reporting UFOs and to compel current and former officials to reveal what they might know about the mysterious phenomena by promising to protect them from reprisal.

The bipartisan amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, passed by voice vote without debate, is part of an aggressive effort to exert more oversight over an enduring intelligence-gathering challenge that has gained more attention in recent years.

“This legislation may open the floodgates,” said a former Pentagon official responsible for investigating the sightings.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/13/house-votes-easier-report-ufos-00045640

[aoibhghaire]

Luis Elizondo’s unaired statement to the Brazilian Federal Senate

First published in That UFO Podcast, July 11, 2022, at TC 1:19:29


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1peRrNyJyM

https://twitter.com/blackvaultcom/status/1546478193325924352
1546478193325924352

And this is the transcript:


"Greetings, ladies and gentlemen and esteemed members of the government of Brazil!

I apologize for not being able to make this address in person and I hope that my appeal is not diminished in any way, due to my inability to be with you today.

My name is Luis Elizondo and I'm a career intelligence officer with the United States government. From 2008 to 2017, I had the privilege to participate in a small, but significant program within the Pentagon, focusing on the collection of UFO data. In 2010, I was asked to lead the overall effort which later became a small footnote to my country's history, involving the dedicated study of this phenomenon.

It was during this time that it became very evident to all of us involved in the project that our military was encountering a technology that far exceeded our own capabilities. Furthermore, it was abundantly clear that this technology had the ability to gain access to our controlled airspace, and once more perform in ways that was unimaginable and yet verifiable by some of our most sophisticated weapon platforms and data collection techniques.

On a regular routine basis our military equities were coming face to face with these technologies, perplexing our military eyewitnesses, and stymieing our best efforts to understand the unique performance characteristics. Furthermore of critical concern, was the apparent interest this phenomenon has with our nuclear technologies, including power generation, weapons systems, and propulsion.

Recently, elected officials in my country have decided the evidence was too overwhelming to ignore, and called upon our defense and intelligence communities to participate in a public hearing, of which I suspect many more will follow. The result of the hearing was simple and yet astonishing: 1) UFOs are real, 2) UFOs most likely represent a real technology, and 3) UFOs are considered a national interest for the United States.

Further reinforcing this new priority is a requirement for defense and intelligence communities to work with partner nations and allies. Although I applaud this new, renewed interest in a historically forbidden area of study, it is with great concern that I worry about any single country having monopoly on the study of what is now considered beyond next generation technology and by default, controlling the narrative of this topic. This is precisely the mindset that has relegated the legitimate study of this topic to fringe and pseudoscience for the last seventy years.

Ladies and gentlemen, today I speak to you not as a former intelligence officer, not as a representative of the US government, and not as a UFO expert. Today, I appeal to you as an ordinary citizen of the world, as your brother, your father, your son, pleading you take this topic seriously, and to do what is necessary, not just for your constituents, but for every person on the planet. Today, you have a rare opportunity that comes only once in a lifetime.

Today, I ask you to seriously consider the establishment of a Brazilian government sponsored UFO program that includes scientists and academics. The time has come to remove conspiracy theory and replace it with quantum theory, remove stigma and replace it with academia, remove secrecy, and replace it with transparency. I ask that Brazil help lead the world in a new millennium of enlightenment and knowledge. I dream that one day Brazil may sit amongst friends, perhaps at the United Nations or perhaps even in San Marino, and help usher in a new era of understanding.

Before we close I'd like to share a little personal thought, if I may, with you.

You are in a very rare opportunity right now as leaders for Brazil. Times and opportunities like this do not happen very often. In fact, in one person's lifetime they may not happen at all. But as a species these paradigm moments occur for us and in fact are a natural part of our species' evolution.

One man, for the very first time that man came out of the cave and looked into the heavens, realized that the shadows that were being portrayed on the side of the cave wall were no longer real. That wasn't mankind's reality and crawling out of the cave for the first time and witnessing the heavens, maybe that was the first fundamental paradigm change for our species.

Perhaps the second time was when mankind struck two stones together and created a spark and that spark led to fire. That fire illuminated the darkness for which man was scared at one time, and now a man could roam freely in the night, illuminating the darkness.

Perhaps the last time mankind came to some sort of paradigm moment like this was when two people were standing on a sandy beach, and one person looks to the other and says: "I'm going to sail over that horizon."

Of course, the other person said: "No, you don't want to do that because you'll fall off the earth, and in fact, there are sea monsters out there. There are giant krakens and they will destroy your ship."

Now we look back and we kind of laugh at that, but in reality, it turns out there are sea monsters. It's just that those sea monsters now have names: They're called great white sharks, blue whales, great squids of the Pacific, and they're not really sea monsters are they? They're part of our natural world, of our current paradigm.

So perhaps with this topic, this is just another paradigm moment. Perhaps we as a species are standing yet on another sandy beach, and we're looking at the horizon one more time, and we're about to sail over that horizon together.

I would submit to you that this change is a very necessary and very healthy part of our species' evolution, and I believe we may be at the precipice yet again of another paradigm moment for species.

In closing, I'd like to thank you for allowing me to speak with you today, and thank you truly and humbly for your attention to this most important matter. Again, please forgive me for not being here in person, but I am here with you in spirit, and I sincerely hope that you can do what's necessary to help propel this topic forward.

Please make no mistake! You are on the right side of history with this conversation. Thank you, and God bless!"

[aoibhghaire]

The Senate’s Intelligence Committee Criticises Pentagon As UFOs ‘Exponentially’ Increase, Whilst Making Clear That New Office Will Not Investigate ‘Man-Made’ Objects

This is a significant revelation and in effect states that the UAP Office will not be investigating man-made craft, and will instead investigate unknown phenomena, which are not attributable to any nation or non-state actor. Therefore, even (though many experts doubt) if China or Russia possessed crafts which move between space, air and water, the UAP Office would not be handling such reports if identified as such.

The report provides a significant surprise from the normal UAP speak, where it states "cross-domain transmedium threats to United States national security are expanding exponentially"? I presume this means world security. Are they talking conventional too but if so which country has these "transmedium" craft?

‘The formal DoD and Intelligence Community definition of the terms used by the Office shall be updated to include space and undersea, and the scope of the Office shall be inclusive of those additional domains with focus on addressing technology surprise and ``unknown unknowns.''’

The Report goes on to state that, ‘temporary nonattributed objects, or those that are positively identified as man-made after analysis, will be passed to appropriate offices and should not be considered under the definition as unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena.’

Its interesting that we have a crossing line into emphasis on under water 'craft'. IMO and speculation, this may indicate that they know the possible origins of the intelligence behind this which is 'under water bases'. We have been used to 'looking up' for answers to the phenomenon, but the answer may be under 'our feet'

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/the-senates-intelligence-committee-criticises-pentagon-as-ufos-exponentially-increase-whilst-making-clear-that-new-office-will-not-investigate-man-made-objects

[Kryztian]

In dramatic shift, national intelligence director does not rule out ‘extraterrestrial’ origins for UFOs
https://thehill.com/opinion/international/581710-in-dramatic-shift-national-intelligence-director-does-not-rule-out/

For seven decades, government officials systematically dismissed, ignored and belittled any mention of UFOs. Indeed, despite mind-boggling intelligence assessments, Cold War-era national security fears led the U.S. government to apply scientifically absurd explanations to highly credible UFO encounters.

In short, the prospect of a sitting high-level national security official openly discussing otherworldly origins for UFOs was long unthinkable — until last week.

Asked about a recent report in which the government admitted that it could not explain 143 out of 144 military encounters with mysterious flying objects – including several which appeared to demonstrate extraordinary technology – director of national intelligence Avril Haines said, “There’s always the question of ‘is there something else that we simply do not understand, that might come extraterrestrially?’”

Haines’s comment is the latest sign that a seismic shift in the government’s official stance on UFOs is underway.

Just a few weeks before Haines’s groundbreaking statement, NASA administrator Bill Nelson made waves by speculating publicly that UFOs might have otherworldly origins. Indeed, after meeting with the naval aviators who encountered objects that appeared to move in ways that defied physics and aerodynamics, Nelson is convinced that the pilots saw something truly extraordinary.

Moreover, after reading a classified government report on the military’s recent UFO encounters, Nelson – an Army veteran, former senator and ex-astronaut – said, “The hair stood up on the back of my neck.” Clearly, something has NASA’s chief spooked.

Like Nelson, former Presidents Obama and Clinton both speculated openly about the likelihood of alien life when asked about UFOs in June. Obama went on to state that “There’s footage and records of objects in the skies that we don’t know exactly what they are. We can’t explain how they moved, their trajectory. They did not have an easily explainable pattern.”

Obama was likely referring to mysterious flying craft that, according to the government, appear to “remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernible means of propulsion.”

Queried about these seemingly physics-defying movements, former CIA director John Brennan made a jaw-dropping statement, suggesting that “a different form of life” might be behind the phenomena. Similarly, another former CIA director (and long-time UFO skeptic), James Woolsey, signaled a new openness to otherworldly explanations for UFOs.

John Ratcliffe, Haines’s predecessor as director of national intelligence, injected eyebrow-raising context to the military’s recent UFO encounters.

According to Ratcliffe, U.S. intelligence analysts have “high confidence” that foreign adversaries – such as China or Russia – are not behind the most extraordinary UFO sightings. In a stark summation of the government’s assessment of the phenomenon, Ratcliffe stated that some UFOs exhibit “technologies that we don’t have and, frankly, that we are not capable of defending against.”

After reading the classified version of the government’s recent UFO report, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) echoed Ratcliffe’s comments, ruling out highly advanced Chinese or Russian aircraft as likely explanations for the mysterious objects. In an interview about the military’s UFO encounters, Romney referred to “technology which is in a whole different sphere than anything we understand.”

But sightings of unknown craft exhibiting highly advanced technology are not a recent phenomenon. Roscoe Hillenkoetter, the first director of the CIA, said that objects “operating under intelligent control” displayed extraordinary technology in the decades after World War II.

Mirroring recent government assessments, Hillenkoetter stated that neither the United States nor any other nation could have developed such advanced aircraft.

Indeed, declassified documents from the late 1940s and early 1950s show that intelligence analysts systematically ruled out ultra-secret U.S. technology and foreign competitors as plausible explanations for the most compelling UFO encounters.

Despite these jaw-dropping assessments, a series of bizarre – and still unexplained – 1952 UFO sightings in the skies above Washington, D.C. alarmed America’s defense planners. As UFO reports and public queries about the incidents overwhelmed the military’s communications channels, national security officials grew concerned that the Soviet Union could exploit public interest in UFOs to cause mass panic and gain an advantage in a surprise attack.

As a result, the Air Force’s 20-year project to catalogue UFO sightings quickly devolved into an exercise in “debunking” and discrediting even the most credible encounters.

As renowned atmospheric physicist James McDonald made clear, the Air Force began applying “meteorologically, chemically and optically absurd” explanations to UFO sightings. McDonald’s assessment was corroborated by astronomer J. Allen Hynek, who served for two decades as the Air Force UFO project’s civilian scientific consultant.

In a stark – and refreshing – break from the government’s record of foisting bizarre, unscientific explanations onto highly credible UFO cases, Haines stated last week that “we don’t understand everything we’re seeing.”

Thankfully, the glaring deficiencies in UFO reporting and analysis identified by Haines may soon be addressed.

If historic legislation proposed by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) is adopted by Congress, the government will be forced to conduct the comprehensive, objective and science-based assessment that the UFO phenomenon has long demanded.

[aoibhghaire]

Congress implies UFOs have non-human origins

In Congress, where legislation is drafted, debated and enacted, clear and concise definitions are of paramount importance. As military aircrews increasingly encounter unidentified flying objects (UFOs), lawmakers recently made several striking revisions to the definition of “UFO.” Key among them: The explosive implication that some UFOs have non-human origins.

As first reported by researcher Douglas Johnson, a draft bill approved unanimously by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence rebrands UFOs as “unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena.” Expanding the definition to include objects in space and under the oceans significantly broadens the scope of a muscular new office tasked by Congress with investigating UFOs.

The revised definition of “UFO” also includes “transmedium” objects which, according to lawmakers, “transition between space and the atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water.”

In short, members of a key national security-focused committee believe that objects of unknown origin are demonstrating remarkably advanced technology by moving seamlessly between space, air and water. A report accompanying the legislation notes that “transmedium threats to United States national security are expanding exponentially.”

It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include such extraordinary language in public legislation without compelling evidence. Perhaps members have seen the classified sensor data that prompted former President Trump’s director of national intelligence to state that UFOs exhibit “technologies that we don’t have [and] that we are not capable of defending against” (among several other eyebrow-raising comments).

Most strikingly, Congress’s new definition of “UFO” excludes “man-made” objects.

https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/3610916-congress-implies-ufos-have-non-human-origins/

[Chester]

Speaking of The Hill (@Kryztian)

Is this headed into the direction of "disclosure?" Or, is this just another cog in the wheel to set up humanity into believing in "benevolent / here to save us" ET?

What if "they" (or at least the most significant player in the basket of aspects called, The Phenomenon by insiders)... if "they" are simply "from here" (the near Earth part of our solar system) yet from a different time? I know what the 'hopium smokers' want it to be but if we just blindly accept the narrative that is under development, what might be our fate?

https://thehill.com/opinion/3610916-congress-implies-ufos-have-non-human-origins/

[Chester]

And notice that there are 2 members and 1 guest currently reading the thread that is about the single most important "thing" in the known history of humanity?

[Kryztian]

Speaking of The Hill (@Kryztian)

Is this headed into the direction of "disclosure?" Or, is this just another cog in the wheel to set up humanity into believing in "benevolent / here to save us" ET?


That's the 64 Trillion Dollar Question and a major theme throughout this thread. But there are, in my not so humble opinion, no easy answers. On this thread we focus on the institutions that control the flood gates of truth, especially the political ones, but also media, academia, NGOs (especially "To The Stars Academy"). There is a lot to digest, but my only two conclusions are:


It would be foolhardy to simply trust these institutions and take what they say at face value. And almost no one here on Project Avalon makes that mistake. Following TTSA is not a popular form of hopium (as Q-anon is/was) on this forum.


It would be foolhardy to simply distrust these institution and regard everything they say as a lie and ignore what is happening here. And that is a mistake many here do make. :sun:



We talk about a lot of people who are out there pushing disclosure: Lue Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, various congress people, Jeremy Corbell, Tom DeLonge, etc. They clearly no more than we do, but I don't think they have all the cards. The people who do have all the cards, in my not so humble opinion, we do not know their names or faces. And perhaps they aren't even "people". One hunch I have is that they are cryptoterrestrials.

One thing about liars is that time usually exposes their untruth. Of course, these liars are quite sophisticated, but on the other hand the lie they are concealing is enormous. Until those floodgates really open, we just need to wait and watch really closely.

[Kryztian]

The CIA's Jim Semivan: "There's an entity out there!

1562964053827276800

Entire interview at:

v0uaYxeqsS0

[aoibhghaire]

New Senior Advisor for Biden Administration gives his thoughts on UAP.

Not sure when this clip was released. I hadn't realised he was a new advisor to Biden


https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/x90o4j/new_senior_advisor_for_biden_administration_gives/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

[Kryztian]

New Senior Advisor for Biden Administration gives his thoughts on UAP.

Not sure when this clip was released. I hadn't realised he was a new advisor to Biden


That would be John Podesta. This must be a recent clip because it was announced that he was appointed to the Biden Administration two days ago as a "climate advisor". Notice how artfully he didn't answer the question about "what do you know that we don't know."

He hasn't been seen in the media for some time since Wikileaks released many of his emails, where he is asked about "pizza related maps" or the strange art collections that he and his brother have. Perhaps he didn't want to embarrass the media for not asking questions the public would want to know, about his and his brother's supposed pedophilia and occultism.

In the video, it seems he is insinuating that the White House has UFO footage that "should" be released to the public and that he is advocating for it. I assume that if he says that publicly, what is really meant is that they are going to release some footage.


https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-appoints-ex-clinton-aide-john-podesta-climate-adviser-scathing-social-media-reactions

Biden appoints ex-Clinton aide John Podesta as new climate adviser, sparking scathing social media reactions
Critics slammed Podesta's appointment as evidence of corruption in Washington, DC

Twitter users voiced outrage after the Biden White House announced Friday that former Clinton campaign manager and Obama counselor John Podesta will assume the role of senior adviser to the president for clean energy innovation and implementation.

"We are fortunate that John Podesta will lead our continued innovation and implementation. His deep roots in climate and clean energy policy and experience at senior levels of government mean we can truly hit the ground running to take advantage of the massive clean energy opportunities in front of us," President Biden said in a statement tacked onto the press release.

full article at https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-appoints-ex-clinton-aide-john-podesta-climate-adviser-scathing-social-media-reactions

[aoibhghaire]

Air Force Secretary of State Frank Kendall: "In my view, UFOs do not pose a threat." Sept 9, 2022

Washington (USA) – While the previous admissions and efforts to investigate UFO sightings by US pilots are mainly driven and coordinated by the US Navy, the US Navy, the US Air Force is still keeping a low profile when it comes to unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and airspace phenomena (UAPs). Now the civilian head, the Secretary of State of the "Department of the Air Force", Frank Kendall has commented on the matter on US television.


https://www.grenzwissenschaft-aktuell.de/air-force-staatssekretaer-frank-kendall-ufos-stellen-aus-meiner-sicht-keine-bedrohung-dar20220909/

[aoibhghaire]

The US government has funds in place for the establishment of a government office on UAP.
The instructions provide for the reporting of non man made objects that have an unknown technology.
Historical reporting from January 1, 1947 are to be included.
Excemption of reprisals or legal issues on personell that report UAP are enacted.
This is a 3 year period with 180 days to report after the UAP office is started.

The Congressional Record is very detailed, however, below is a sample from the link.

Text of Senate Amendment 5950; Congressional Record Vol. 168, No. 157
(Senate - September 28, 2022)

Sec. 704. Comptroller General of the United States compilation of
unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena records.

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-168/issue-157/senate-section/article/S5406-1#:~:text=SEC.%20702.%20MODIFICATION%20OF%20REQUIREMENT%20FOR%20OFFICE%20TO%20ADDRESS%20%0A%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20UNIDENTIFIED,General%20considers%20necessary%20to%20 carry%20out%20%0A%20%20%20%20%20subsections%20(b)%20and%20(c)

SEC. 702. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR OFFICE TO ADDRESS
UNIDENTIFIED AEROSPACE-UNDERSEA PHENOMENA.

(a) In General.--Section 1683 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (50 U.S.C. 3373) is
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1683. ESTABLISHMENT OF UNIDENTIFIED AEROSPACE-UNDERSEA
PHENOMENA JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE.

``(a) Establishment of Office.--
``(1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the date
of the enactment of the Intelligence Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2023, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination
with the Director of National Intelligence, shall establish
an office within a component of the Office of the Secretary
of Defense, or within a joint organization of the Department
of Defense and the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence, to carry out the duties of the Unidentified
Aerial Phenomena Task Force, as in effect on December 26,
2021, and such other duties as are required by this section,
including those pertaining to--
``(A) transmedium objects or devices and unidentified
aerospace-undersea phenomena;
``(B) space, atmospheric, and water domains; and
``(C) currently unknown technology and other domains


First briefing.--The first briefing provided under
paragraph (1) shall include all incidents involving
unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena that were reported
to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force or to the
Office established under subsection (a) after June 24, 2021

``(A) observed to transition between space and the
atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water;
and
``(B) not immediately identifiable.
``(8) The term `unidentified aerospace-undersea
phenomena'--
``(A) means--
``(i) airborne objects that are not immediately
identifiable;
``(ii) transmedium objects or devices; and
``(iii) submerged objects or devices that are not
immediately identifiable and that display behavior or
performance characteristics suggesting that the objects or
devices may be related to the objects or devices described in
subparagraph (A) or (B); and
``(B) does not include temporary nonattributed objects or
those that are positively identified as man-made.'

(2) Submittal to congress.--The head of the Office shall--
(A) make the records compiled under paragraph (1)
accessible to the congressional intelligence committees, the
congressional defense committees, the Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the
Committee on Homeland Security of the House of
Representatives, and congressional leadership; and
(B) not later than September 30, 2023, and at least once
each fiscal year thereafter through fiscal year 2026, provide
to such committees and congressional leadership briefings and
reports on such records

``FOIA'')), and such other relevant historical sources as the
Comptroller General considers appropriate; and
(2) for the period beginning on January 1, 1947, and ending
on the date on which the Comptroller General completes
activities under this subsection, compile and itemize a
complete historical record of the intelligence community's
involvement with unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena,
including successful or unsuccessful efforts to identify and
track unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena, and any
intelligence community efforts to obfuscate, manipulate
public opinion, hide, or otherwise provide unclassified or
classified misinformation about unidentified aerospace-
undersea phenomena or related activities, based on the review
conducted under paragraph (1)

[aoibhghaire]

Exclusive: More UFO Hearings Are Coming As Whistleblowers Are Called Forward And Legacy Programs Are Verified By Congress.

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/exclusive-more-ufo-hearings-are-coming-as-whistleblowers-are-called-forward-and-legacy-programs-are-verified-by-congress

Written by Christopher Sharp - 14 October 2022

Some insiders have told Liberation Times that new UAP whistleblower language could be signed into law “in weeks” and after upcoming midterm elections.

Corbell comments: “The Silver Bullet is coming.”

Once National Defense Authorization Act 2023 becomes law, it is expected that public Congressional hearings will take place, and whistleblowers have already been requested to testify.

It has also been confirmed by multiple sources that information relating to alleged secretive UAP retrieval and reverse-engineering programs has now been verified by Congress.

There is now some urgency from Congress to provide transparency and some insiders hope that any released information can potentially bring people together at a time when the likelihood of nuclear conflict has risen.

Liberation Times has learned that new public Congressional Unidentified Aerospace-undersea Phenomena (UAP) hearings can be expected once National Defense Authorization Act 2023 (NDAA) UAP language is signed into law.

As reported by Dean Johnson, Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA) 2023 language is now wrapped up within the NDAA and includes important whistleblower protections.

[aoibhghaire]

‘New territory’: America’s top aerospace sleuths join UFO hunt.

The country’s largest organization of technical experts has concluded that recent incursions pose a safety hazard to aircraft.

America’s top aerospace engineers and scientists are joining forces to protect us from UFOs.

The country’s largest organization of government and private sector technical experts is launching a project to study “unidentified aerial phenomena,” after concluding that recent incursions by mysterious craft pose a safety hazard to military and commercial aircraft, according to people involved in the effort.

The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, which includes among its
members the country’s largest defense and NASA contractors, has established three
committees to study the technology, how incursions affect pilot and passenger safety,
and to coordinate with government agencies and international researchers also focused
on the topic.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/19/new-territory-americas-top-aerospace-sleuths-join-ufo-hunt-00062588

[aoibhghaire]

TOP SECRET UFO PROJECTS - Interview with Pentagon Insider Christopher Mellon

Premieres Oct 25, 2022, 7pm GMT

The once third-highest-ranking intelligence man in the Pentagon suspects that the U.S. has recovered and reverse-engineered crashed UFOs.

Former senior intelligence official Christopher Mellon works behind the scenes to ensure that politicians are informed about UFOs and that new laws are enacted so that the issue finally receives attention. Among other things, he ensured that the UAP Task Force was required to submit an official report on UFO findings by the U.S. military in June 2021. At the Ufology World Congress in Barcelona, Robert Fleischer recently had the opportunity to interview him - about what the military knows about UFOs and especially about what is still hidden in top secret projects so far..

The complete interview in German and English as well as all links to the show are now available exclusively on website ExoMagazin.tv ►► https://www.exomagazin.tv/christopher...

This is going to be published of the entire
interview with Christopher Mellon in English with Italian subtitles
tonight at 8:00 PM CET on youtube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg0YLxT_Rbg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg0YLxT_Rbg

[aoibhghaire]

For those who saw the CM interview here is a post analysis of the Chris Mellon (CM) from Post No. 529.

This was a good interview. How (in spite of seemingly being a straight-shooting, formal, credible, "vanilla world" authority, CM is starting to recognize that there are (or could be) secret UFO research programmes outside of the purview of conventional oversight. Like Mr. Bray and Mr. Moultrie (the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence & Security (USDI&S)), and J2 Admiral Wilson years ago, he didn't seem to have been briefed about such programmes although he - apparently - should have. And (if I'm not mistaken) he supervised SAP and USAP programmes. Anything but heavy-duty issues like MILABS and retro engineering and cattle mutalations and who knows what on that level that maybe is avoided not only by most politicians protecting their careers but even perhaps by the Gang of 8.

IMO the difficult issue is that the most secret programmes include illegal and criminal activity if need be. That the U.S. is still not the exception. That, like many other states in the world, the U.S. would also have unconstitutional and illegal operations. WUSAPS that have to be denied not only because they might involve "core secrets" and such but also because it would entail acknowledging something so outrageous... something or things that people do not want to believe or know without losing faith in who they are (or, at least that's how the cabal secret keepers think about protecting people's self-image and faith in the country)?

But if there are vast operations (like sending recovery teams to Brazil during the Varginha incident) "Moment of Contact" documentary November 2022 launch, somebody in the formal chain of authority would be condoning it. And some would be looking away. And this would be a major secret in order to maintain the country's public image internally and externally. Otherwise, what is going on? If we call the deepest truth occultists "the cabal", for what list of reasons would they be doing it? And who is helping CM and Luis Elizonda to come out with an initial level disclosure-confirmation?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg0YLxT_Rbg

[aoibhghaire]

EXCLUSIVE: New classified report to Congress says only HALF of UFO sightings can be properly explained, leaving nearly 200 mysteries unsolved – as critics say investigators 'glossed over' unknown cases.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11373603/New-classified-report-congress-says-HALF-UFO-sightings-properly-explained.html

Sources tell DailyMail.com a classified report due to be sent to Congress this week lists more than 150 cases of unexplained UFO encounters in the past year.

The 22-page report was compiled by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and analyzes 366 cases.
Only about half of the UFO encounters could be explained.

Examples include video shot by Reaper drones conducting surveillance that caught 'orbs' flying around then 'suddenly bolting off'

Among the explained cases are 'brand new surveillance by foreign adversaries,' including Chinese spy drones attempting to gather information on the US.

The ODNI source was critical of their department's dossier, saying it glossed over the many intriguing and worrying unexplained cases
'They don't want to talk about this stuff, because they really, really don't know what the hell they are. That's the truth,' the source said

[aoibhghaire]

UNIDENTIFIED AEROSPACE-UNDERSEA PHENOMENA REPORTING PROCEDURES

(Still to be ratified and signed)

S. 4502. Sec 703 UNIDENTIFIED AEROSPACE-UNDERSEA PHENOMENA REPORTING PROCEDURES

(2) "Protection of systems, programs, and activity. -- The system established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall serve as a mechanism to prevent unauthorized public reporting or compromise of properly classified military and intelligence systems, programs, and related activity, including all categories and levels of special access and compartmented access programs, current, historical, and future." (4) Sharing of information. -- The system established under paragraph (1) shall provide for the immediate sharing with Office personnel and supporting analysts and scientists of information previously prohibited from reporting under any nondisclosure written or oral agreement, order, or other instrumentality or means, except in cases where the cleared Government personnel administering such system conclude that the preponderance of information available regarding the reporting indicates that the observed objects and associated events and activities likely relate to a special access program or compartmented access program that, as of the date of the reporting, has been explicitly and clearly reported to the congressional defense committees and congressional intelligence committees, and is documented as meeting those criteria."

IMO most of the whistleblower information will be reported to UAP JPO and ODNI and eventually to the Congressional (Senate and House) defense-arms appropriations and intel committees with no obligation to inform the public, especially if the information is related to SAPs (and, under this category USAPs, WUSAPs) that have already been clearly reported to those committees.

But what about SAPs (and USAPs WUSAPs) that - perhaps have not been reported to those committees? Are MILABS part of any USAP or WUSAP? Would they be reported to the so-called "Gang of 8" or to the aforementioned committees? Are these congressional members also given something like "Top Cover" to protect their innocence and plausible deniability? Why is the mandated report (due October 31) still taking so long with little or no explanation?

[aoibhghaire]

When UAP projects will not be reported:

S 4503 Intelligence Authorization Act for FY 2023 (added to the soon-to-be-signed NDAA FY2023)

The first paragraph refers to not reporting information when the preponderance of the phenomenon observed is related to a SAP or a CAP.

(4) SHARING OF INFORMATION.—The system established under paragraph (1) shall provide for the immediate sharing with Office personnel and supporting analysts and scientists of information previously prohibited from reporting under any nondisclosure written or oral agreement, order, or other instrumentality or means, except in cases where the cleared Government personnel administering such system conclude that the preponderance of information available regarding the reporting indicates that the observed object and associated events and activities likely relate to a special access program or compartmented access program that, as of the date of the reporting, has been explicitly and clearly reported to the congressional defense committees and congressional intelligence committees, and is documented as meeting those criteria.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The second paragraph refers to the Director of the (UAP JPO) Office reporting to the proper congressional committee Chairmen and Vice Chairmen regarding instances in which UAP data was not provided to the (UAP JPO) Office due to "classification restrictions on that data or for any other reason."

“(4) INSTANCES IN WHICH DATA WAS NOT SHARED.—For each briefing period, the Director of the Office shall jointly provide to the chairman or chair and the ranking member or vice chairman of the congressional committees specified in subparagraphs (A) and (D) of subsection (o)(1) an enumeration of any instances in which data relating to unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena was not provided to the Office because of classification restrictions on that data or for any other reason.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Its possible these provisions allows the deepest secret managers to leave out a lot, perhaps not informing the proper congressional committees.

[aoibhghaire]

IMO the mainstream media is still largely nonreactive to the UAP report delay. That their down-to-earth real-world attitudes have to catch up to a greater reality that demands a loftier approach not only related to competing material interests but also to consciousness. However, the mainstream media appears to be slowly catching up, as the "UFO giggles" are less frequent and reporters are less inclined to take the "taboo road". Thanks to the many UAP-related articles by Marik von Rennenkampff, more politicians and people associated with "the hill" at large (Congress, and government institutions in DC) must be waking up to the already realities that have been formally acknowledged in a nonaggressive way...(non-human intelligences have been left only as a possibility; the DoD-ODNI reports have been "mild"; the U.S. President, UN Secretary-General, Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff, or someone of a similar standing has not come out talking openly about UAP).

Logically, the next step after a wider and clearer acknowledgment will be to consider the implications behind the fact that nonhuman intelligences are here on Earth, have been here for a long time, and apparently quite active in what we consider to be "our" world, among other things, also interacting with us. Nonetheless, the practical, "real world" and "Real Politik" concerns of much of the rest of the population in the English-speaking and the rest of the world outside of the UFO community do not consider these implications important seriously and are mired in great personal needs, competing for power and material interests, and belief camps under growing social incoherence, cynicism, groupthink-religious-political fanaticism, selfishness, indifference, and pessimism about what is possible.

The "voice of ICER" (or ICER as a unified voice and - distinctly - as its individual members) can indeed be part of an ensuing worldwide conversation about the implications concerning that nonhuman intelligences are here and interacting in this world. Perhaps there should be a regular podcast even before the Serenissima Reppublica di San Marino replies to the ICER proposal PROJECT TITAN.

[aoibhghaire]

UFO RECOVERY AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER REVEALED IN NEW US INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT: DECEMBER 2022 / JANUARY 2023

Stunning mention of recovered UFOs and exploitation of their technology by the United States government has been found buried within a newly issued official congressional intelligence document. The US National Laboratories and private industry are implicated as beneficiaries of such retrieved technology. Further, the time period discussed encompasses 1947 (the year of the Roswell UFO crash) to the present day.

THE EXTRAORDINARY DOCUMENT

The statements were located in the massive 2023 US House Intelligence Authorization Act document that was authored by select members of Congress cleared and chosen to sit on The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (also called The House Intelligence Committee).

Chaired by Adam Schiff (D-CA), the House Intelligence Committee oversees the nation's intelligence agencies including components of the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, State, Treasury and Energy.

The document addresses tracking “unidentified aerospace / undersea phenomena” and refers explicitly to “efforts to recover or transfer related technologies to United States industry or National Laboratories.”

THE EXTRAORDINARY DOCUMENT

Relevant excerpts from the document (with key sentences highlighted in red underline) from “The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) H. Rept. 117-546 - INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023” : See link below.

The entire document can be accessed from this link: https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/117th-congress/house-report/546/1

THE DOCUMENT’S IMPLICATIONS

The inclusion in the intelligence document of statements about UFOs and the recovery and transfer of their associated technology shows that the issue is a real and serious matter. They do not appear to be speculating about a “possibility” but are in fact acknowledging such things and that these things require action, including a demand for all records related to the subject.

The document speaks to unknown recovered technology and its transference to national labs and the private sector, likely defense contractors. The obvious purpose would be for analysis, duplication and exploitation of these exotic technologies and materials.

WHAT CAN BE CONCLUDED

This document demonstrates that some members of the Intelligence Committee have some level of awareness of the reality of retrieved physical UFO evidence. It is inconceivable that discussion of UFO/UAP recovery and technology transfer would be included within an Intelligence Authorization Act unless these committee members had very good reason to do so.

The immense document addresses hundreds of intelligence issues from war and rumors of war to cybersecurity threats. For it to contain mention of UFOs, recovered technology and technology transfer, the year 1947 (and the use of a classified annex to communicate about the matter) alongside very pressing world issues is remarkable. It shows that the matter of intrusion in our skies and seas by technologies not made by man is an intelligence matter of utmost priority.


https://www.ufoexplorations.com/?fbclid=IwAR1_UWCpY7ZXGGCpBk7sySZ2jJ0p93Ae3cleF3VKvDxn4rCtSPbjeDFjgSk

[Bill Ryan]

UFO RECOVERY AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER REVEALED IN NEW US INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT: DECEMBER 2022 / JANUARY 2023Here's the very interesting document: :thumbsup:

https://congress.gov/117/crpt/hrpt546/CRPT-117hrpt546.pdf

https://congress.gov/117/crpt/hrpt546/CRPT-117hrpt546.pdf

[aoibhghaire]

A preliminary look at the UAP-related provisions of the final proposed FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 7776)

Is the cause of transparency, disclosure, accountability, and whistleblower safety better off with the latest NDAA FY 2023 version? It was filed in the U.S. Congress on Dec 06, 2022.

Click on the following LINK to read the latest NDAA version that is about to be signed by the House of Representatives and then by the Senate and President Biden: https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR7776EAS-RCP117-70.pdf

SOME NEW DETAILS:

"UAP" now refers to UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA and (as the previous version) it includes transmedium objects.

The current office "AARO" (ALL ANOMALIES RESOLUTION OFFICE) will keep its name and will not be renamed "UAPJPO."

The sentence "temporary nonattributed objects or those that are positive identified as man-made," that forced AARO to focus on non-manmade objects has been erased from the final bill.

The historical, comprehensive UFO study that had been assigned to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), an arm of Congress, is now being assigned to AARO, with GAO only performing a later "audit" and congressional briefings. However, the historical study concerning how the USG related to "to unidentified anomalous phenomena" has been extended to January 1, 1945. It might include research into the so-called "Trinity UFO crash."

The latest NDAA may force the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) and the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) the obligation to listen to and protect whistleblowers. But a provision stating their right to engage in a private cause of action against the USG was eliminated.

However, the new NDAA also forces a deadline on the Secretary of Defense to retransmit whistleblower information to the appropriate Congressional Committees and leadership in 72 hours or less:

"Not later than 72 hours after determining that an authorized disclosure relates to a restricted access activity, a special access program, or a compartmented access program that has not been explicitly and clearly reported to the congressional defense committees or the congressional intelligence committees, the Secretary shall report such disclosure to such committees and the congressional leadership."

We must also keep in mind that the information given to the U.S. Congress may not necessarily reach the general public if it is considered too sensitive.

https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/uap-related-provisions-of-the-final-proposed-fy-2023-national-defense-authorization-act/

[aoibhghaire]

After the May 17, 2022 hearings in the House of Representatives, it was known that briefings were happening behind the scenes and, likely, with whistleblowers. This may be so because, soon thereafter, the Senate released emergency provisions for whistleblowers. After that, as explained by Christopher Sharp, there was an explanatory report about an “exponential increase in transmedium objects” (objects that can move between space, air, and water). And there were many criticisms about the lame report given in a hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives in May 17, 2022.

Then, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY 2023 NDAA was combined with the FY 2023 Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA). The coupling of the NDAA with the IAA shows that key Congressmen are trying to get information about the legacy programs and current secret UFO programs. However, they are not required to share this with the public and, particularly, cannot legally share data gathering ways and means, and breakthrough technologies.

The blended NDAA forces both the DoD and IC to report (to the adequate armed services and intelligence committees and proper congressional leaders) information about programs that had not been previously or adequately reported. Now, if there are people that have knowledge about these programs (also within private contractors) they can break their non-disclosure agreements, or verbal orders from superiors to report to AARO (All Anomalies Resolution Office) and once AARO has validated that information they will report it to the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense (working under the Secretary of Defense) and not to Ronald Moultrie Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security USDI&S from (allies of Garry Reid, obfuscating adversary of Lue Elizondo).

The key point is that the new legislation compels the Department of Defense (DoD) and Intelligence Community (IC) to cooperate and support AARO which also has a core group of representatives from multiple agencies in the intelligence community and military services.

Then the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) will have up to 72 hrs. to report that information to the relevant congressional committees.

July 21, 2022. “The Director of AARO is Sean Kirkpatrick, chief scientist from DIA. The AARO will synchronize efforts across DOD and with other federal agencies to detect and identify airborne, anomalous, unidentified space, transmedium and submerged objects in and near military bases, training areas, special use airspace and other areas of interest, DOD said. Kirkpatrick brings to the role over 20 years of experience in scientific and technical intelligence, acquisitions, research and development and space policy. He previously served as deputy director of intelligence for U.S. Strategic Command, director of the National Security Strategy at the National Security Council and deputy director of intelligence and DNI Representative for U.S. Space Command.”


It also appears that Ronald Moultrie (undersecretary of defense for intelligence and security), will lead the AARO Executive Council to provide oversight and direction to the newly created office.

“The office has six primary lines of effort: surveillance, collection and reporting; system capabilities and design; intelligence operations and analysis; mitigation and defeat; governance; and science and technology.”

Christopher Sharp mentioned that Congress is not happy over the previous reporting and hearings situation and some conjecture for the delay on the report that was due October 31. AARO provides the date to the ODNI (Office of Director of National Intelligence) and ODNI writes the report but they need to coordinate with other agencies to verify the information.

“Legislative Affairs” is a liaison office for ODNI to link with Congress. There will be constant back and forth between congressional staffers and ODNI to make sure that ODNI is meeting the intent of Congress. We don’t know what is causing the delay. Perhaps AARO is not meeting the intent of the NDAA because it is currently very poorly staffed but no one (outside) knows what is really going on. Perhaps (to meet the current NDAA intent stipulated in the current version) Dr. Kirkpatrick is now forced to find information previous to 1945.

Douglas Dean Johnson mentions that Bill Section 1673: Secure Method for Authorized Reporting (“Safe Harbor” or “UAP Whistleblower” provision) To report to the Armed Services & Intelligence Committees which do not have to share this information with the public.

AARO’s scope of interest is expanded in Section 1673(a)(1)(B) "any activity or program by a department of agency of the Federal Government or a contractor of such department or agency relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena, including with respect to material retrieval, material analysis, reverse engineering, research and development, detecting and tracking, developmental or operational testing, and security protections and enforcement."

Bill Sections 6802 & 6803. AARO will conduct a historical record report on Government involvement in UAP.

*The current NDAA now excludes AARO’s previous order to focus on non-man-made objects: The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence SSCI-approved bill (S. 4503) contained a proposed definitional change to exclude from the scope of the phenomena being investigated "temporary nonattributed objects or those that are positive identified as man-made." This language generated sharply conflicting interpretations among commentators over the past six months. Whatever it was intended to mean, it has been dropped from the final bill.

The current NDAA bill changes the terms “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena” and “Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena” to “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.” This does not include paranormal phenomena but on “objects” as in the 2021 legislation “(A) airborne objects that are not immediately identifiable; (B) transmedium objects or devices; and (C) submerged objects or devices that are not immediately identifiable and that display behavior or performance characteristics suggesting that the objects or devices may be related to the objects described in subparagraph (A)." The term "transmedium objects or devices" is again defined to mean those (objects) that are "observed to transition between space and the atmosphere and bodies of water" and "are not immediately identifiable."

Historical research: “The current NDAA version places the responsibility for the historical research and report on AARO and the Government Accountability Office GAO will only perform a later "audit" and part of the briefing to Congress.”

“Now, the historical report that must be presented by AARO must include "the historical record of the United States Government relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena..." going back to January 1, 1945. The report is to include "a compilation and itemization of the key historical record of the involvement of the intelligence community with unidentified anomalous phenomena, including (I) any program or activity that was protected by restricted access that has not been explicitly and clearly reported to Congress; (II) successful or unsuccessful efforts to identify and track unidentified anomalous phenomena; and (III) any efforts to obfuscate, manipulate public opinion, hide, or otherwise provide incorrect unclassified or classified information about unidentified anomalous phenomena or related activities."

Christopher Mellon (former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence) said in an interview given in the 2022 Ufology World Congress that the U.S. Air Force (associated to the Space Force) refused to research UAP in space because the previous IAA language mentioned “unidentified aerial phenomena.” Also, the Space Force said that being “aerial” it didn’t concern them. So, the legislators changed the term first to “aerospace” and now to “anomalous.”

Christopher Sharp mentioned that it would be a good PR process to have a public hearing for the more mainstream public with the likes of pilots Alex Dietrich and Ryan Graves, establishing that UAP are not drones. After that, there could be a more advanced one with the likes of Mellon (and Elizondo) validating the existence of crash retrieval programs.

So, soon -upon enactment - likely in December 2022, we will have this new NDAA "law of the land" that should be a game changer. But I wonder if the protection mechanism for whistleblowers is going to be sufficient since attorney Daniel Sheehan has doubts about it. I also wonder if the delay in AARO-ODNI's UAP report means that they are doing their best to get at extensive information with AARO's scarce resources or that they are pushing back and getting Congress and 'The People' used to DoD and IC setting their own limits. As Christopher Mellon also said, the intent is not public disclosure but to see if there is a national security threat. However, as Christopher Sharp mentioned, a President and public pressure and congressional interest could decide to reveal much more, even if they cannot reveal details about ways and means and technologies.



Sources:

“A preliminary look at the UAP-related provisions of the final proposed FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 7776)” By Douglas Dean Johnson

https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/uap-related-provisions-of-the-final-proposed-fy-2023-national-defense-authorization-act/


“Christopher Sharp NDAA IAA & New UAP Report” (The Disclosure Team YouTube conversation with Christopher Sharp. 13 Dec 2022).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKG_IqiT8tE



HR 7776 NDAA UAP Text added to the Congressional Record on Dec 8 2022

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7776/text


“Pentagon establishes office to track UFOs in space” Space.com. July 21,2022

Pentagon establishes office to track UFOs in space | Space


“Sean Kirkpatrick Named Director of DOD All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office.” July 21, 2022. Sean Kirkpatrick Named Director of DOD All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (executivegov.com)

“La entrevista de Jaime Maussan a Chris Mellon, En el The Ufology World Congress de Barcelona” 2022. Sept 9, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr7u-f_x9jQ

“Conferencia de prensa con Christopher Mellon y Jaime Maussan en "The Ufology World Congress" Maussan TV. Sept 9, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQMIDaX7etQ&t=3294s

[aoibhghaire]

STRATCOM Reports Reveal Previously Unknown Effort Investigating UAP; Pentagon Quickly Denies and Explains As “Simple Error”

https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/stratcom-reports-reveal-previously-unknown-effort-investigating-uap-pentagon-quickly-denies-and-explains-as-simple-error/

In the military world of researching Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, or UAP, the list of research efforts, acronyms and “task forces” keeps getting bigger. Despite some controversy and fine-print details on the exact scope of some earlier programs, the efforts known as AAWSAP, AATIP, UAPTF, AOIMSG, and AARO have all been said to represent some form of research into UAP, most of which was officially sanctioned and mandated.

Now, that list gets even longer, and two formerly classified Top Secret reports from the United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) written in July and August of 2020 and released in part to The Black Vault in December of 2022, reveal the “Unidentified Aerial Phenomenology (UAP) Joint Inter-agency Task Force (JIATF).”

The full acronym? UAP JIATF.

But despite details about classified briefings, and at least two mentions of the UAP JIATF in formerly Top Secret documents written nearly a month apart; the Pentagon claims the group name is only a mistake.

Just over four hours after being asked by The Black Vault, the Pentagon quickly shot down the idea that the UAP JIATF actually existed.

“That was a simple error in terminology – both ‘JIATF’ and ‘Phenomenology’ — when USSTRATCOM personnel prepared their internal report. There was not a DoD JIATF on UAP,” said Pentagon Spokesperson Susan Gough in an e-mailed statement to The Black Vault. “We began using ‘task force’ or ‘UAPTF’ informally internally shortly before the UAPTF establishment memo was signed on Aug. 4, 2020.”

Conclusion

This message of the meaning of the new documents is that The Black Vault just released about UAP JIATF https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/stratcom-reports-reveal-previously-unknown-effort-investigating-uap-pentagon-quickly-denies-and-explains-as-simple-error/

Without going into detail, I understand that it is nothing but a typo, while the pending unclassified report is expected to be released soon.

[aoibhghaire]

Transcript at link for the following update.

USD(I&S) Ronald Moultrie and Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick Media Roundtable on the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
Dec. 16, 2022

Ronald Moultrie, Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security; Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office

https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3249303/usdis-ronald-moultrie-and-dr-sean-kirkpatrick-media-roundtable-on-the-all-domai/

[aoibhghaire]

I thought this was a good historic summary of actions on UFO/UAP by US Congress to the end of 2022 (17 December 2022)

https://tas-education.org/exostudies/historic-action-on-ufo-uap-by-us-congress/

[aoibhghaire]

I hope that the true intent of AARO behind the US Congress and its fusion of the IAA into the NDAA is not thwarted by OUSD&I and an Air Force pushback. And I hope that they are provided the funds to accomplish the enormous amount of work that was stipulated in the final U.S. Senate-approved NDAA.

Yes, Mr. Moultrie and Dr. Kirkpatrick's recent declarations are disappointing...No evidence of alien origins in hundreds of UAP cases studied? Also, two recently disappointing articles were published, one in the NYT and another in the WSJ just before the new NDAA was about to be approved in Congress.

It's as though AARO (receiving guidance from OUSD&I which itself probably receives 'guidance' from others truly "in the know") insists on starting from scratch and the ones pulling the strings are not part of the control group that truly knows what is going on, most likely outside of formal supervision channels and working on legacy projects in association with private contractors.

The final NDAA version also eliminated a clause that mentioned whistleblowers' right to sue the USG if they felt that there was wrongdoing from their superiors for coming out to AARO (that should re-transmit their information to the SECDEF and to the proper committees in the US Congress. The final NDAA version also eliminated the clause that ordered AARO to focus on non-manmade objects. These setbacks may disincentivize many potential whistleblowers.

A necessary question is what is motivating that "cabal" in the know?

[aoibhghaire]

The Office Which ‘Lied’ And ‘Persecuted Whistleblowers’ Sidelined By Congress From U.S. UFO Investigation

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/office-which-lied-and-persecuted-whistleblowers-sidelined-by-congress-from-us-ufo-investigation

Congress on U.S. UFO Investigation


President Joe Biden today signed the Fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act into law, which has been shaped by Congress over previous months.

Of note, the legislation contains new provisions relating to what is now known as Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).

Provisions include protections and reporting mechanisms for potential whistleblowers involved in alleged UAP retrieval and reverse-engineering programs, and the requirement for a new report detailing the historical records and documents belonging to the intelligence community relating to UAP from 1 January 1945 onwards.

Of note, the legislation also means that Dr Sean Kirkpatrick, Director of the UAP office known as the AARO, will now report directly to Deputy Secretary of Defense, Kathleen Hicks, and the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, Stacey Dixon, on all operational and security matters relating to the AARO.

Only administrative matters will now be reported to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (OUSDI&S), where a UAP office has been located since 2021, meaning that it would effectively be sidelined on the most important elements of UAP investigations.

[boja]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMvbMWnV3Rs

24 Dec 2022 #BreakingNews
BREAKING NEWS: Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Christopher Mellon confirms that Dr. Eric W. Davis is the author of the Admiral Wilson Notes

[aoibhghaire]

IMO this is the game changer, having Chris Mellon confirming that Eric Davis wrote the Davis-Wilson notes.

Chris Mellon's timing is no accident.

This is indeed is a wonderful Xmas present in the last 3 hours.

[aoibhghaire]

In reference to post 543

NDAA FY23 and AARO's Strange Setbacks

As Christopher Sharp wrote in his December 23, 2022, Liberation Time article "Office Which ‘Lied’ And ‘Persecuted Whistleblowers’ Sidelined By Congress From U.S. UFO Investigation", OUSD(I&S) seems to have been sidelined, but I suspect that OUSD (I&S) (and or someone else) is still powerfully influencing what can be said by AARO. What makes me think that? In the following press conference roundtable, Mr. D. Moultrie and Dr. S. Kirkpatrick minimized evidence for an alien component (after reviewing hundreds of more UAP cases mostly based on military sightings). They said that they had found no evidence of alien intelligence.

Also, (if I'm not mistaken) Mr. Moultrie said that they had found no evidence for transmedium objects in his current review!

"We have not, to the best of my knowledge, had any credible reporting, that we've been able to analyze of trans-medium activity or trans-medium objects. We are still going through the data. And so, I would say that it's early on in the process. So, I don't want to be definitive to say that there's nothing that is there. But I would say that we have not seen since the -- the May hearing, we have not seen any – any indications that there have been trans-medium activities with UAPs."
This is the LINK to the media AARO-OUSD(I&S) roundtable: USD(I&S) Ronald Moultrie and Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick Media Roundtable on the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office > U.S. Department of Defense > Transcript

However, after some cogitating, I wonder whether the IAA annex from October 1st, 2022 annex (which included the "non-manmade objects" language and which also was in the July 2022 IAA version) has been surreptitiously added to the current - signed into law - NDAA? Could it be that "trans medium" is still so connected to the original "non-manmade" clause that, even if it is not openly mentioned in the main text, it is still hidden in the law, and this is a reason why it is being downplayed?


If I understood well, OUSD(I&S) currently has a supervisory, advisory, and administrative role now. Whistleblowers will have to present themselves directly to AARO (which will vet their claims). They will not go to OUSD (I&S) but perhaps the latter still exerts plenty of control over AARO.

The current, enacted-signed NDAA FY23 is indeed a step forward towards greater openness, public education, and accountability but several important pro-disclocure clauses were removed from the previous main text. For example, the order to focus on "non-manmade objects" was removed from the main NDAA text.

Two more setbacks:

1) The Historical UFO report that was going to be independently compiled by GAO, US Comptrollers Office since 1945 will be conducted by AARO and is now only to be reviewed, audited by GAO, US Comptrollers Office.

2) The clause referring to whistleblowers' rights to sue the USG (if they felt they had been wronged for whistleblowing) was removed.

At this point, AARO's capacity to accomplish what it's being asked for requires plenty of funding and I believe that that would depend on other committees' decisions. If leaders from the appropriate Congressional committees are still dissatisfied they may add more pro-transparency provisions to next years' IAA and NDAA in order to know what has been hidden from them.

I just hope that what today comes across as a current information control and 'pushback' (also manifested in recent poorly researched skeptical articles in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post) doesn't increase and turn AARO into another (even if more sophisticated) truth-squelching Project Blue Book. As mentioned, it will depend on how satisfied the relevant congressional leaders are, and for now, they seem to be trusting the process although the report ordered on December 2021 and due on October 31st, 2022, is 54 days late! Will the many other UAO-related reports ordered with specific deadlines in the NDAA FY23 also be so nonchalantly late?

Sources:

Christopher Sharp. Liberation Times. December 23, 2022 article "Office Which ‘Lied’ And ‘Persecuted Whistleblowers’ Sidelined By Congress From U.S. UFO Investigation."

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/office-which-lied-and-persecuted-whistleblowers-sidelined-by-congress-from-us-ufo-investigation

USD (I&S) "Ronald Moultrie and Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick Media Roundtable on the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office." Dec 16, 2022. USD(I&S) Ronald Moultrie and Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick Media Roundtable on the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office > U.S. Department of Defense > Transcript

H.R.7776 - James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023. Sections 1673, 6802, 6803.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7776/text

Dan Lamothe. "No Alien Life Discovered on Earth Says Pentagon but Search Deepens". December 16, 2022.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/12/16/pentagon-ufo-office-alien-life/

Holman W. Jenkins Jr. The Wall Street Journal - Opinion. December 2, 2022. "The UFO Bubble Goes Pop"

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-ufo-bubble-goes-pop-disinformation-pentagon-uap-sightings-china-nelson-nasa-secrets-11670010814

Julian E. Barnes. The New York Times. October 28, 2022. "Many Military U.FO. reports are Just Foreign Spying or Airborne Trash. Forget space aliens or hypersonic technology; classified assessments show that many episodes have ordinary explanations."

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/28/us/politics/ufo-military-reports.html

[ExomatrixTV]

Unprecedented UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) Legislation

Unbeknownst to most Americans, President Biden just signed into law far-reaching legislation that could soon confirm the existence of an alien presence on earth. The relevant provisions, incorporated into legislation (https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7776/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22hr7776%22%2C%22hr7776%22%5D%7D&r=1&s=2) needed to provide funding for the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Intelligence Community (IC), enjoys strong bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. This is arguably the biggest story mainstream news organizations have ever failed to cover. Among other things, this new legislation:


Provides greatly enhanced authorities and resources for the ‘All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office’ or ‘(AARO),’ which now reports directly to the leaders of the Defense Department and the Intelligence Community. The organization’s unusual name is intended to clarify that its purview extends to anomalous objects regardless of their location (i.e. land, air, undersea, or space).



Mandates a review of all intelligence documents involving UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) from 1945 to the present.



Requires DoD, DHS, and the IC to identify any non-disclosure agreements related to UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) and provide those to the new AARO office.



Directs the new AARO office to develop a UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) science plan to assess the sometimes mysterious and mind-bending capabilities being reported as well as a collection plan to leverage America’s vast technical intelligence apparatus to determine where these objects are coming from and their capabilities and intent. This aggressive UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) investigation, using America’s unparalleled intelligence capabilities, is what I hoped to accomplish when I brought the famous DoD UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) videos (“Gimbal” and “Flir”) and Lue Elizondo to the NYT (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html) and the oversight committees on Capitol Hill in December, 2017. Recall that Mr. Elizondo had just resigned his position on the staff of the Secretary of Defense in protest over DoD inaction in the face of innumerable violations of restricted DoD airspace by UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022).



Provides a secure process for anyone who has signed an official US government secrecy agreement related to UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) to come forward and reveal that information to AARO and to Congress, regardless of the level of classification, without fear of retribution or prosecution. This provision is intended to determine the veracity of longstanding allegations indicating that the US government has recovered extraterrestrial technology and perhaps even extraterrestrial beings. The alleged UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) crash in 1947 near Roswell, New Mexico, offers the most famous example, but there are many others. For example, in his new book Trinity: The Best Kept Secret (https://www.amazon.com/TRINITY-Best-Kept-Jacques-F-Vall%C3%A9e-ebook/dp/B0B8DXY8TC/ref=sr_1_1?crid=32UTLB1ID2ZEX&keywords=jacques+vallee+trinity+the+best+kept+secret&qid=1671488098&s=books&sprefix=Vallee+Trinity%2Cstripbooks%2C115&sr=1-1), the renowned writer, scientist and venture capitalist Dr. Jacques Vallee surfaces a new case of alleged ET spacecraft recovery operations.

The historical intelligence document review, and the review of government secrecy agreements, should be completed over the next 18 months. That process alone could validate claims the US government has been concealing proof of an extraterrestrial presence near earth. If it seems unbelievable that Congress would pass such legislation, it is only because of the paucity of reporting on the facts that caused members of both parties in Congress to join together to pass these provisions.

Even before this ‘whistleblower’ legislation was signed into law, credible individuals were providing Congress.

information alleging that the US government has recovered extraterrestrial technology. This process began in 2019 when I brought astrophysicist Dr. Eric Davis to Capitol Hill to meet with staff from the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services committees. Dr. Davis, author of the famous Wilson-Davis memo (https://ufologyweb.com/admiral-wilson-memo/), provided specific information lending credence to sensational reports that an official US government program is actively seeking to exploit recovered technology that was fashioned by some other species or perhaps advanced AI machines. Much of the information Dr. Davis provided remains highly classified, but the good news is that these sensational claims, which have the potential to transform our understanding of the universe and man’s place within it, are now being taken seriously and properly investigated. I’ve brought others besides Dr. Davis and Lue Elizondo to the Hill and the AARO office and I am encouraging anyone else who may be able to help set the record straight to step forward as well.

I’m not claiming that the information provided to Congress or to AARO proves that earth has been visited by extraterrestrials. However, Dr. Davis and Mr. Elizondo and other witnesses are credible former government officials who worked on highly classified government programs. Having heard their reports, and those of others who are coming forward, I can vouch for the fact that the AARO office has serious leads to pursue. The media is doing the public a great disservice by ignoring the UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) issue because a sudden shocking revelation runs the risk of being far more disruptive and disturbing than information gradually processed and absorbed. If these claims prove true, blindsiding the public greatly increases the risk of negative consequences.

Although it is true that Congress could seek to keep the AARO office’s findings confidential, it is doubtful that this information can be kept under wraps for long if confirmed. I say that not because the government is incapable of keeping secrets. Indeed, the reverse is more nearly true: DoD and DoE black programs are almost never compromised. By contrast, intelligence reports (e.g. reports on the Iranian nuclear program) often leak because policymakers want to influence public opinion, but even in those cases the technical or human sources behind the reporting are rarely revealed. In fact, while serving as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence at DoD, I can only recall one instance of a DoD special access program being compromised and that was simply because the capability was used in combat during the Gulf War. In the case of UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022), however, the individuals coming forward want the information to be disclosed, as do many members of Congress who are the recipients of the information being gathered by AARO. In that regard, I recently had the opportunity to ask Senator Gillibrand, a leading sponsor of the legislation, whether she would support revealing the existence of alien technology if the whistleblower process confirms these sensational allegations. Without missing a beat, she replied: “Of course! Why not?” Most members of Congress and their staff, and most of those coming forward presenting evidence, seem to agree that the American people have a right to know. This is therefore a case where I believe the truth, whatever it proves to be, will prevail in the not too distant future.

Even if the UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) whistleblower provision and UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) document reviews being mandated by Congress do not lead to confirmation of an ET presence near Earth, ongoing governmental and scientific investigations of UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) activity might lead to the same conclusion. Now that the anti-UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) stigma is being lifted, and the government has established UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) reporting procedures, fresh data regarding hundreds of new UAP incidents is pouring in. At last count the official number of UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) incidents was at 400, and is still rapidly increasing. If the media is guilty of the sin of omission when it comes to reporting on the unprecedented, bipartisan UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) legislation that was just signed into law, they are guilty of the sin of commission when it comes to misleading reporting regarding UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) activity detected by DoD and the IC. I’ll have more to say about that soon. For the moment, I’ll simply venture to predict that the facts, when they emerge, will directly contradict recent reporting in the Wall Street Journal by Holman Jenkins Jr. and Seth Shostak, as well as reporting in the New York Times by Julian Barnes, which claims that conventional explanations have been found for most of the UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) reports identified by DoD and the IC. I believe that the report, when it emerges, will deepen the UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) mystery rather than provide explanations for the burgeoning number of UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) incidents involving violations of US airspace.

Consider that although the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) has produced nothing of import, despite decades of work, it is still rightly regarded as a worthwhile effort. The most notable SETI incident occurred back in the 70’s, when a strangely powerful and mysterious signal was detected. It has become famously known as the Wow! signal. Although it remains unexplained, there is now some reason to believe it may have had a terrestrial origin. By contrast, the US government has only just begun officially investigating UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) with modern sensors yet we already have hundreds of official military cases that defy conventional explanation. Hundreds of Wow!-like events, most involving data from multiple sensors! Moreover, in some cases, the ET hypothesis seems the best or only viable explanation (e.g. the Nimitz case which left no doubt in the minds of some of the Navy pilots and radar operators).

I therefore suggest giving the UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) investigative process a chance and I am frankly baffled why anyone would expect DoD or the IC to have firm answers when the AARO office is only just beginning to be properly staffed and funded. Would we expect SETI to find definitive proof of aliens the moment they began collecting data? Meanwhile, with this recently passed legislation, Americans have reason to hope we will soon know the truth of legendary allegations that the US government has recovered alien technology. For those seized with curiosity over the UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) issue, I can’t imagine a better Christmas gift than this new UAP (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022) legislation.

Merry Christmas, with special thanks and appreciation to the members of Congress and their staffs who have put national security and science ahead of stigma and ignorance.


source (https://www.christophermellon.net/post/unprecedented-uap-legislation)

[aoibhghaire]

In spite of the setbacks, pushbacks, etc, including some useful clauses deleted, confirmation of an ET presence is advancing.

Merry Christmas!!

[boja]

This Today (28 Dec 2022) from ROBERT SALAS on Twitter :-

"Recently, I have been contacted to give testimony to AARO on 1967 Malmstrom AFB UFO incidents. Also have helped provide names of other UFO-NUKES witnesses for AARO testimony. I anticipate these will be given in early 2023. Pls retweet."

1:47 PM · Dec 28, 2022

https://i.redd.it/rz7y883b0p8a1.jpg

[aoibhghaire]

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/is-a-ufo-church-committee-coming-to-congress-lue-elizondo-says-he-would-support-creation-of-new-committee-to-get-to-the-bottom-of-this-enigma

Is A UFO Church Committee Coming To Congress? Lue Elizondo Says He Would Support Creation Of New Committee To “Get To The Bottom Of This Enigma”

Following the signing into law of the Fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and its Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) provisions, former AATIP director, Lue Elizondo, has told Liberation Times that he would support the idea of establishing a committee which could quickly and accurately get to the bottom of the enigma.

[Bill Ryan]

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/is-a-ufo-church-committee-coming-to-congress-lue-elizondo-says-he-would-support-creation-of-new-committee-to-get-to-the-bottom-of-this-enigma

Is A UFO Church Committee Coming To Congress? Lue Elizondo Says He Would Support Creation Of New Committee To “Get To The Bottom Of This Enigma”

Following the signing into law of the Fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and its Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) provisions, former AATIP director, Lue Elizondo, has told Liberation Times that he would support the idea of establishing a committee which could quickly and accurately get to the bottom of the enigma.Ha. I do know this is political theater, of course. And it may even be a necessary pathway, maybe the only one that's realistic.

But I also confess I rather roll my eyes when I hear something like that. As so many know, the "enigma" is all fully understood, at least to a very large degree — and has been for many decades. :)

[boja]

Interesting interview with USAF Witness, MARIO WOODS.
MARIO WOODS is 1 of 8 Witnesses already "called to testify before congress."
He witnessed a "UFOs & Nukes" incident in 1977 at Ellsworth AFB in S. Dakota.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozvj1c5DvSE

[Johnnycomelately]

Whoa boja, great story. Got to 1:34: of 1:40+:. Feels like it might be too great to be true, so seamless, but time well spent.


Interesting interview with USAF Witness, MARIO WOODS.
MARIO WOODS is 1 of 8 Witnesses already "called to testify before congress."
He witnessed a "UFOs & Nukes" incident in 1977 at Ellsworth AFB in S. Dakota.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozvj1c5DvSE

[aoibhghaire]

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/is-a-ufo-church-committee-coming-to-congress-lue-elizondo-says-he-would-support-creation-of-new-committee-to-get-to-the-bottom-of-this-enigma

Is A UFO Church Committee Coming To Congress? Lue Elizondo Says He Would Support Creation Of New Committee To “Get To The Bottom Of This Enigma”

Following the signing into law of the Fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and its Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) provisions, former AATIP director, Lue Elizondo, has told Liberation Times that he would support the idea of establishing a committee which could quickly and accurately get to the bottom of the enigma.Ha. I do know this is political theater, of course. And it may even be a necessary pathway, maybe the only one that's realistic.

But I also confess I rather roll my eyes when I hear something like that. As so many know, the "enigma" is all fully understood, at least to a very large degree — and has been for many decades. :)

I also roll my eyes. But, generally speaking, the human family has been split between those that scoff at the possibility of ET already here on Earth, those that have some interest or curiosity, and those who do not...care.

Among the few of us that care, most are split into an objective-only tendency under old materialist scientific standards or into a believer-sentiment-preponderant approach. Within those minorities, only some tend to be both spiritually and culturally open to ET and its implications while trying to maintain an objective approach.

Will there be chaos if too much is confirmed too soon? Only a small percentage of the population going berserk is needed to disrupt a livable social order. Can leaders get into the fray and do their job without a national security reason with which to save face and without being initially told by the military "we don't know what they are?" How disclosure-confirmation is unfolding seems to be a carefully thought strategy.

[Kryztian]

Is A UFO Church Committee Coming To Congress? Lue Elizondo Says He Would Support Creation Of New Committee To “Get To The Bottom Of This Enigma”


I have to laugh at the comparison to the Church Committee which would "Get to the bottom of" things. Did the Church Committee ever get to the bottom of MK-Ultra, Project Mockingbird or Project Family Jewels??? The answer is a big resounding "NO", despite Senator Frank Church and other's best efforts. In retrospect it was just a way to sweep things under the rug. No one ever went to prison for murder, torture, or treason, in fact, not even one single person got indicted for the massive array of crimes that went on. The committee was just a way to acknowledge the Elephant in the room, that these programs existed, and pretend that our elected leaders dealt with the problem. It was just Congress's way of slapping some people at the CIA and NSA with a wet noodle, in effect saying, "Okay, if you naughty, naughty boys are going to keep doing these naughty, naughty things, than you had better be a lot more discreet."

Calling it "The Church Committee" shows just what they are really trying to do with "disclosure" - they are acknowledging that yes, that had just a tiny bit of interest in UFOs and were just a teensy-weensy bit secretive about it, but now it's going to be all above board. Meanwhile they continue to build up the massive secretive breakaway civilization involved in technology and secrecy even more but with more security, learning from all their past mistakes.

[boja]

Jim Quirk Nails it here.

Back around 1947, when Truman & a few other "Nobodies" decided that the Public "Can't Handle the Truth" -
in my humble opinion, that was a BIG Mistake.

Many People get Really angry over being lied to, especially regarding an issue that is the Biggest affecting Humanity, Ever.
Sooner or Later Everybody is going to know.

Yes there will be some disruption, BUT Life Will Go On.

Meanwhile, this Pathetic slow disclosure gets ever more Silly by the day.

Personally being elderly, I shall be going to my grave soon, Ashamed that I was once part of the Human Race.
At least they Didn't fool me. I'm making a note, Never to Re-incarnate into this species.
Meanwhile I'm just a saddened spectator. Billions content to live in a "Fairytale" reality - You just can't help some people.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZYcBDj1iUE

[boja]

ODNI Report on UAP (Due 31 Oct 2022) -

Dropped today (12 Jan 2023) -

https://dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Unclassified-2022-Annual-Report-UAP.pdf

More Toilet Paper.

[Did You See Them]

https://twitter.com/_/status/1614421828927164419

Notable alarms !!
i.e Not Russian or Chinese.

[mountain_jim]

saw this covered on Tucker last night with interview with Nick Pope ... video here:

http://vod.foxnews.com/media/v1/pmp4/static/clear/694940094001/ac2a24f1-7d69-488a-986d-ed2c6de3c935/3ae96ba3-8439-462e-9100-0dd0367f6790/main.mp4

http://vod.foxnews.com/media/v1/pmp4/static/clear/694940094001/ac2a24f1-7d69-488a-986d-ed2c6de3c935/3ae96ba3-8439-462e-9100-0dd0367f6790/main.mp4

Is this meaningful?

https://www.foxnews.com/media/reported-1945-ufo-sighting-investigated-us-government-roswell-before-roswell

Reported 1945 UFO sighting to be investigated by US government: 'Roswell before Roswell'

An 'avocado-shaped' object allegedly crashed in New Mexico 78 years ago

An amendment added to the National Defense Authorization Act in late December would require the Department of Defense to review historical documents related to an alleged 1945 unidentified flying object (UFO) sighting in New Mexico.

The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), created in July 2022, will lead the effort to identify any "unidentified anomalous phenomena that may pose a threat to national security."

Former UK Ministry of Defense official Nick Pope spoke out about the alleged mysterious "avocado-shaped" object that crashed almost 80 years ago on "Tucker Carlson Tonight" Monday.

We must get to the bottom of a potential UFO-nuclear connection: Nick Pope
Former UK Ministry of Defense official Nick Pope discusses a bill that would require the Department of Defense to review historical documents related to an alleged 1945 UFO sighting on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'

"This has been called the ‘Roswell before Roswel (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ufo-sightings-surged-last-two-years-us-intel-report-says)l,’" Pope said, referring to the first reported UFO sighting in Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947.

[onawah]

Quite a good report here on disclosure and the coverup starting at 15 minutes 5 seconds into this video, in which Rep. Tim Burchett, a Republican from Tennessee, accused the government of covering up UFO sightings.

Now Left MORE afraid of Trump & Musk; DeSantis goes after China; AI & Govt can’t hide THIS anymore
Front Page with Scott Goulet
232K subscribers
1.5K
6,497 views

"New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, said that she will resign as prime minister of New Zealand, and she will not run in the general election, which is scheduled for October.

While Democrats are still waiting for Biden to decide whether he will run for president, next year, President Trump's campaign is already on the agenda. Trump's campaign was in contact with Facebook's parent company, Meta. Here are the details.

U.S. authorities arrested the majority shareholder, and co-founder of Bitzlato, which is a cryptocurrency exchange.

Rep. Tim Burchett, a Republican from Tennessee, accused the government of covering up UFO sightings."

LTGvqbrA4Q0

[aoibhghaire]

Great News! for Discosure:

Yesterday, San Marino government/parliament has passed the proposed Project Titan as part of ICER initiative.
This is the step required to making historic UFO request at United Nations.

This now awaited step was required to making historic UFO annoncement at United Nations. Historically, the 1978 Granada proposal was only at the committee stage, but never got to the announcement stage to the UN and in particular, setting up an office at the UN, goes beyond previuous attempts.

• The parliament has passed Project Titan, a proposal that would see San Marino make a historic United Nations request for the creation of periodic UFO/UAP conferences under its aegis.

The potential is there for both ICER and San Marino to set up an office within the UN as part of the educational process for all nations. ICER is an INGO within the minimum legal remit with the support of one sovereign state, i.e. Republic of San Marino.

• Project Titan was greeted positively after the passing by the Heads of State at the parliamentary debate.
A report and news of this historical event by the San Marino Government will come out shortly. (see previous ICER details on thread)

• Project Titan’s Creator and Manager Paolo Guizzardi of ICER stated: “I’m so excited by this positive outcome”

• This decision by the San Marino’s Congress of State is the first sovereign state to take the next step for UAP/UFO Disclosure.

It is expected that the U.S. UAP Office are in a position to also cooperate with San Marino to make the UN request, as it has the mandate to coordinate with international allies and partners. Even if the US doesn't cooperate with San Marino, the remit is still can proceed there to follow with ICER's Project Titan with San Marino.

It dosn't require any other nation to support this initiative. However, because of this historical nature its possible some other governments such as Brazil may cooperate with San Marino. Representatives from ICER had presented to the Brazil government last October 2022 the back gound of the San Marino initiative. It was agreed that Brazil would support this if passed by San Marino.

When San Marino proceeds, the proposal will undergo a preliminary examination and discussion at the UN, before being submitted to a vote by the General Assembly.

Furthermore, there have been signs that Russia and China could also support such a the San Marino remit, especially as Project Titan’s origins can be traced to an earlier apparent Chinese effort.

[aoibhghaire]

Although this is not directly related to this thread but it will have a significant affect as events take place during 2023.

Already, since the news of this historical event some US known military whistleblowers have noticed this news through other feeds.
Ten whistleblowers who have been officially invited to the ARRO hearings this year which is timely in there deliberations to that office. The process now is rather like a pincer movement, where the US gov through its UAP offices may have to accelerate the process now that the San Marino government is leading its march to the UN with a huge calvary behind it.

https://twitter.com/icer_network/status/1616456796171915265?s=21&t=2Bhwc1-BckXm5sGlQLmJjg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lxovKE5t4w

The Parliament of San Marino voted in favour to particpate in Project Titan, created by ICER, meaning that the government of San Marino will submit a proposal to UN's Secretary General for the creation of a permanent office tasked with the preparation of periodic global conferences on UFOs. Robert Fleischer interviews Dr. Roberto Pinotti and Paolo Guizzardi of ICER who have been the driving forces behind Project Titan.

For more information on Project Titan, visit:

https://icer.network/2023/01/20/press...

https://icer.network/2022/01/31/proje...

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icer.network

Twitter: https://twitter.com/icer_network

A few hours after the launch, the important Italian news agency Adnkronos launches the joint press release CUN ICERUfo, Cun: "San Marino available to host UN international conference"

https://www.adnkronos.com/ufo-cun-san-marino-disponibile-a-ospitare-conferenza-internazionale-onu_1JU5XuynqvCipyFx7fBqhU

ZLANDCOMMUNICATIONS

NewsNetwork

Toronto | Canada | zland@sympatico.ca

B R E A K I N G
N E W S
Press Release
For Immediate Distribution
January 20, 2023
UNITED NATIONS MEMBER STATE APPROVES ICER PROPOSAL ON UFOs

Toronto [ZNN] In a bold and unprecedented international breakthrough, the Parliament of San Marino has approved a proposal by the International Coalition for Extraterrestrial Research (ICER) to establish an office to study UFOs.

Read the entire press release at: http://zlandcommunications.blogspot.com/2023/01/united-nations-member-state-approves.html


Here is an overview of the actions and sequence of events that will now take place .

After San Marino Parliament has voted in favour of their Republic participation in Project Titan, here are a few lines for proper information of everyone.

1. Precedents
What is Project Titan: is an action plan, developed by ICER and CUN, which provides for San Marino to require the UN the creation of a new office tasked with preparing a World UN Conference on the studies of the UFO/UAP phenomenon, to be held by care of San Marino in the territory of that Republic.

The Project was informally presented to a member of the San Marino government (Minister of Public Instruction and University) in mid Sept. 2022 and to the Heads of State in mid-December, but to no avail.

In need of a better strategy to propose San Marino to take part in the Project, after some search ICER found what appeared to be a better solution: the Istanza d’Arengo, an ancient institute in San Marino legal system, which is basically a popular petition. Given that a certain number of Sammarinese citizens had manifested an active interest in the initiative of Project Titan and were available to sign it, it was chosen to go the ‘Istanza d’Arengo way’ to propose San Marino participation in Project Titan.

ICER prepared a detailed and well documented Instanza d’Arengo which essentially asked that San Marino took part in the action plan of Project Titan.

After having it signed by a dozen Sammarinese citizens, the Istanza was submitted in the first useful occasion mandated by the law, that is Oct 2nd 2022. On Oct 17th, the San Marino Heads of State gave the green light for the petition to be discussed and voted by the Parliament.

The petition was then discussed in the January 2023 session of Parliament, and approved in the evening of Jan 19th, 2023.

2. What happens now on the Sammarinese side

According to the law, once that the Parliament has approved the Istanza, it will issue a decree which will bind the Government to enforce what was requested in the Istanza, that is, that San Marino takes part in Project Titan.
The government then will have to comply to what was mandated by the Parliament.

3. What happens now on the ICER side

Once the Parliament has issued the government-binding decree, the first thing to do for the proponents of the initiative, that is ICER+CUN, will be to sign the Memorandum of Understanding for the Practical Implementation of Project Titan, the formal act where the participants express their will and accord to implement the action plan.

Then, the first phase of the operation will be for ICER and CUN to coordinate with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of San Marino to properly set up the action at the United Nations.

This phase is of the utmost importance for the success of the initiative. It has to be noted that the 1978 UN initiative of Grenada’s Sir Gairy failed mostly (even if not only) because it was not properly planned ahead, if at all.

It is reasonable to expect it will take a good amount of coordination and effort to conduct a good campaign at the UN, but ICER+CUN are well equipped for this campaign.

This phase will end with the vote at the UN General Assembly.

Next will come the phase of the creation of the new office and of its functioning. In this phase it will be necessary to work in strict coordination with the Sammarinese Secretary to Tourism, and albeit at a lesser degree, with the Secretary to Public Instruction, Culture, and University.

4. The timing of the operations

The San Marino proposal to the UN will have to be submitted, according to UN regulations, at the beginning of the UN General Assembly, that is at mid-September 2023. Then the proposal will be assigned for preliminary discussion at a given UN committee (for Grenada it was the Special Political Committee, but now for sure it will be different). After preliminary discussion by the competent committee, which could happen from October to December, the committee will (hopefully) recommend the proposal for vote by the General Assembly, which could happen somewhere from December 2023 on.

In case the proposal is approved, the UN will create the new office which will prepare the UN World Conference on the UFO/UAP Phenomenon Study, which will be periodically held in San Marino.

5. Considerations

The approval of the Istanza d’Arengo by the Parliament of San Marino is a very important event in itself. Of course, it must be noted that a positive outcome at the UN is not to be taken for granted, as the Sammarinese proposal will have to be subject to scrutiny and vote. In any case, a great result has already been reached now by ICER+CUN: to bring the subject of the UFO/UAP phenomenon back to where it belongs, that is at the UN, after 75 years. And, it has to be pointed out that the participation of San Marino to Project Titan happens on the base of the expressed will of the Parliament, on the base of a popular petition.

Let us all hope that the outcome of the UN action will be positive and that San Marino will start soon to be hosting of the World UN UAP Conference. In any case, it will take some hard work, as it happened for the ready to offer San Marino all the assistance and support that they might need.

The role of ICER+CUN: according to the Project provisions, ICER+CUN will assist San Marino in each and every part of the UN campaign in order to assure a positive outcome. But the ICER+CUN involvement will not end here. The action plan provides that once the new office picked up steam, it will have the possibility to avail itself for its activity of ufological experts of any kind, including of course resources from ICER+CUN.

Again, let us remember that the Project could be altered in the phase of preliminary discussion at the given UN committee.

In any case, the Project intends to process that led us to where we are today. In any case ICER+CUN are well equipped, determined and grant ICER+CUN a premiere role in the field of international UFO/UAP research.

Hope that this gives a good overview of the situation.

[aoibhghaire]

https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/new-uap-leaked-imagery-from-the-dod-mosul-orb-uap-published-by-jeremy-corbell-george-knapp/

On May 1st, 2020 a classified briefing was generated about the UFO / UAP presence, via the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). This UAP briefing is a build-on to a previous ONI briefing, generated on October 18th, 2019. Both were distributed across a wide range of intelligence networking platforms (such as SIPRNet, JWICS and various Intelink systems). The UAP intelligence briefing was most recently uploaded and distributed on November 4th, 2021.

This “Mosul Orb” UFO video is included in the above mentioned UAP educational audio / visual presentation. This briefing was generated and populated across intelligence platforms to educate United States Armed Forces and the intelligence community on the nature and presentation of the UAP / UFO phenomenon. Those familiar with the creation of the briefing state that the aim is to de-stigmatize the UAP problem and to promote more intelligence collection regarding UAP incursions and encounters with active military deployments. Although the “Mosul Orb” footage is contained within a classified briefing, the image itself remains unclassified

[Bluegreen]

http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA16GVyt.img?w=768&h=512&m=6

A metallic sphere caught on camera flying over the Iraqi city of Mosul is reportedly being investigated as a UFO sighting by the US military and intelligence community.

The image, a still taken from a four-second video clip captured April 16, 2016, by a reconnaissance aircraft in northern Iraq, was shared by UFO researcher Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell and journalist George Knapp on the first episode of their new podcast “Weaponized” on Tuesday.

(3:31)
CTAGJ2pof0s

[aoibhghaire]

Scientific Coalition for UAP highlights the significance of the release of the recent report on UAP, but the lack of data could hamper scientific investigation.

February 1, 2023 -

The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU), whose 230 members include university professors, members of the high tech and defense industries, scientists, intelligence specialists, and current and former members of space research organizations, wishes to thank the U.S. Congress for the passage of legislation in the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This Act puts the U.S. at the forefront among nations in the collection of data on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) in an open and transparent manner. The SCU also wishes to thank the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) and the supporting Intelligence Community for their work on the recently published ODNI report on UAP. All these government entities should be commended for reducing the stigma in the study of a subject that has long been neglected.


It is rewarding to see that AARO has come to the same conclusion that our UAP research community has: that a percentage of "...UAP appear to have demonstrated unusual flight characteristics or performance capabilities and require further analysis." SCU was created, in part, to conduct in-depth analysis of such reports, and our detailed review of the public data on the Nimitz UAP case revealed anomalously high speeds and accelerations. Such corroboration by AARO of an existing scientific result is very useful to the UAP research community. However, these public Congressional reports will need more information regarding UAP characteristics in order to entice the broader scientific community to engage in the UAP subject. It would be immensely helpful to begin by releasing some of the basic data contained in AARO UAP reports, information such as date, location, shape, physical characteristics, and kinematics; and include the AARO disposition, such as balloon, drone, bird, unknown, etc.


We note that some of the key areas stipulated by the U.S. Congress in the 2022 NDAA to be included in the UAP report did not make it into the public version presented to Congress. These are also areas of active public research, and we hope that future reports will address these items as openly as possible.


The number of reported incidents over restricted airspace, and an analysis of such incidents.

An assessment of any UAP activity that can be attributed to one or more adversarial foreign governments.

Identification of any incidents or patterns.

An update on any efforts underway on the ability to capture or exploit discovered UAP.

The number of reported incidents, and descriptions thereof, associated with military nuclear assets, including strategic nuclear weapons and nuclear-powered ships and submarines.

The number of reported incidents, and descriptions thereof, associated with nuclear material with weapons storage or civilian nuclear facilities.


The requirements in the 2023 NDAA are even more extensive than the 2022 NDAA. The SCU is aware of the amount of work required to properly analyze and study UAP, and we plan to conduct analyses of any reports that are publicly available to us.


The SCU looks forward to the information that the ODNI and AARO will be sharing with the public in the future, and is grateful that the U.S. government agrees that UAP are a critical area of scientific study.


https://www.explorescu.org/post/scu-s-response-to-the-odni-uap-report

[aoibhghaire]

Office of the Director of National Intelligence

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 required the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to submit an annual report to Congress on unidentified aerial phenomena. ODNI submitted the classified annual report to Congress and published the unclassified annual report.

Published in Reports and Publications 2023

2022 ANNUAL REPORT ON UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA

Download the report at link

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2023/item/2354-2022-annual-report-on-unidentified-aerial-phenomena

The SCU has sent out a press release regarding the SCU view of the recent UAP report from AARO and ODNI. A copy of the government report can be found at the same link. Also details from Post 565

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2023/item/2354-2022-annual-report-on-unidentified-aerial-phenomena

There was a serious lack of information in the report. SCU has looked at some of the positive impacts of the report and those are identified in there press release here:

https://www.explorescu.org/post/scu-s-response-to-the-odni-uap-report

[aoibhghaire]

President Biden spoke the other day, limiting the scope of the UFO issue basically to "unknown" objects that may or may not pose a threat to national security and flight safety but which need to be studied both locally and internationally. He said that there were no indications that the 3 objects shot down after the Chinese balloon also were Chinese balloons. He also said that he has directed the Secretary of State to lead international efforts to help establish safe global common norms in this largely unregulated space. Biden's initiative is a contribution to promoting shifting attitudes in international organizations such as the UN. This could help gain credibility for projects like the San Marino, ICER-CUN initiative.

President Biden's initiatives facilitate the possibility of other serious formal initiatives starting at an initial level of recognition of the phenomenon.

Then, after careful accumulation of data and through these new formal research efforts (including AARO's) it will dawn on more political leaders that some of these objects do not seem to originate in the exploits of a modern nation and they will have to face the facts. But they need a sense of doing formally becoming part of the research efforts that get new/more objective results.

After fresh new data on the truly unique aspects of the UFO phenomenon is learned by them by means of these initiatives and complementing their learning curve with the historical and current contributions from ufology, then it will also become their issue and not just that of a few visionaries, UFO buffs, researchers, and contactees ahead of their time. Then the time will be ripe to ask about who are they and the implication of they are "not us." They need to go through the process.

February 16, 2023. "President Biden Delivers Remarks on the United States’ Response to Recent Aerial Objects. The White House."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEibBLZXweA

[aoibhghaire]

Premieres Mar 18, 2023 on Project Unity in 5 hours on Disclosure. Guest: US Congressman Tim Burchett .

"We are going to ask the tough questions"

Rep Senator Tim Burchett | on Disclosure, Drone Footage, Coverups, Classified Briefings & Massive UFO Sighting

Should be worth viewing. Appears to be at the crossing point of frustration by the politicians


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6-HVG3wlAI

[aoibhghaire]

Premieres Mar 18, 2023 Guest: US Congressman Tim Burchett

As I may have mentioned earlier, all of these US Congressional representatives are either going to let this issue fade away as they often do in politics or, the more determined among them will pursue it until they get answers.

In my opinion, all of this activity in the US Congress, among AARO investigators and those within the ODNI who are legislatively under pressure to examine the UAP issue are unwittingly part of a process that is gradually ruling out explanations. Eventually this process will lead to only one inescapable conclusion - these craft are not from Earth. They cannot possibly continue to create/fabricate “other narratives” as explanations.

The Sir Arthur Conan Doyle euphemism will then ring true: “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Now that St. Patrick’s Day has come and gone - leprechauns can also be ruled out!

[Bluegreen]

Rep. Tim Burchett | Drone Footage, Coverups, Classified Briefings & Massive UFO Sighting

(33:18)
u6-HVG3wlAI
1526605121781747713
https://twitter.com/RepTimBurchett/status/1526605121781747713

[RatRodRob...RRR]

http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA16GVyt.img?w=768&h=512&m=6

A metallic sphere caught on camera flying over the Iraqi city of Mosul is reportedly being investigated as a UFO sighting by the US military and intelligence community.

The image, a still taken from a four-second video clip captured April 16, 2016, by a reconnaissance aircraft in northern Iraq, was shared by UFO researcher Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell and journalist George Knapp on the first episode of their new podcast “Weaponized” on Tuesday.

(3:31)
CTAGJ2pof0s

.
.
If you look at that round ufo in the above pic, it looks like the sun is somewhere up near the top right corner, goin by the shadows on the ground.
And goin by the bright round shiny bit on the ufo, this also says the sun is somewher in the top right, so the shadows and the shiny bit on the ufo both indicate the sun to be in the same spot, that is a match and is good, this indicates a degree of authenticity.
.
RRR

[aoibhghaire]

CANADA'S POST MEDIA COVERS UAP SHUTDOWNS OF ICBM MISSILES

ZlandCommunications NewsNetwork

Media Alert March 27, 2023
B r e a k i n g N e w s

Toronto [ZNN] In a ground-breaking Canadian media article, POST MEDIA's Calgary Herald explicitly describes events surrounding how two United States Air Force veterans experienced UFOs (UAP) that tampered with and shut down American Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles - ICBMs.

Their testimony and the scheduled testimony by other veterans with AARO officials could be a major step forward.

READ THE POST MEDIA article and ZNN's coverage at:
http://zlandcommunications.blogspot.com/2023/03/canadas-post-media-covers-uap-shutdowns.html

[blindwillow]

Why isn't there any mention in this thread of Dr. Steven Greer's very important research into "The Lost Century" and how we could have been developing on Earth with free energy during that period of time? Don't think about it, of course. It's too tragic. But why aren't we combining different perspectives such as Courtney Brown's and the Farsight Institute with siriusdisclosure.com (https://siriusdisclosure.com)?

[aoibhghaire]

Hi Blindwillow,

Dr Stephen Greer work is on other threads like other similar 'Disclosure' type descriptions.

Here are some examples

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?115419-UAP-Disclosure-comments-opinions-and-other-material&p=1537144&highlight=Stephen+Greer#post1537144

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114801-Steven-Greer-DISCLOSURE-2.0--25-April-2021-&p=1438224&highlight=Stephen+Greer#post1438224

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?108957-Close-Encounters-of-the-Fifth-Kind-The-CE-5-Protocols&p=1319401&highlight=Stephen+Greer#post1319401

Farsight Institute has also been on other threads.

One example:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110821-The-Remote-Viewing-Data-Dump&highlight=Farsight+Institute

Requires some research to drill down to specifics you're trying to find.

[aoibhghaire]

Part of Disclosure is to gather key government influencers and evidential material to support the outcome.

ICER is currently considerating selecting delegates for the UAP announcement at the United Nations in October 2023.

The Republic of San Marino have been tasked to announced through the Secretary General UN to first make the
announcement of the UAP arena. This will establish the first UAP Office and annual symposia for governments/agencies.

ICER delegates will have 4 hours duration to speak at the United Nations.

In addition, some of the most prominent people who are influencers on the UAP field have already approached ICER.

However, ICER have currently been conducting interviews with the most prominent persons who may be able to support
Project Titan, San Marino remit at the UN as explained in above posts.

The link to icer.networks provides the details about Project Titan and where it is heading after the UN announcement.

[Kryztian]

Why isn't there any mention in this thread of Dr. Steven Greer's very important research into "The Lost Century" and how we could have been developing on Earth with free energy during that period of time? Don't think about it, of course. It's too tragic. But why aren't we combining different perspectives such as Courtney Brown's and the Farsight Institute with siriusdisclosure.com (https://siriusdisclosure.com)?

This thread is focused on the dubious disclosure we have been seeing in the last five years from U.S. Congressional hearings, To the Stars Academy, The New York Times, etc. Greer sometimes comments on that and is even part of this story (since he figures into the Wilson-Davis leaked memo.)

There are many threads on Avalon about real, sincere disclosure. There are also numerous threads about Steven Greer and the Farsight Institute. Also, Wade Frazier has discussed Dr. Greer's memo in his thread (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet).

[boja]

https://twitter.com/GoodTroubleShow/status/1646214773174947840

BREAKING INFORMATION:

New information on our discussions with the Senate Armed Services Committee on the hearing on #UFOs / #UAPs to be held on April 19th and chaired by
@SenGillibrand


THIS IS 100% CONFIRMED.


https://twitter.com/i/status/1646214773174947840

https://www.rdrnews.com/news/national/senate-holding-new-hearings-on-uaps-april-19/article_3cace3fe-d957-11ed-b1ec-935873a47452.html

Christopher Sharp
@ChrisUKSharp
·
51m
As reported by Liberation Times, a public hearing will take place.

I have now independently confirmed this news with the Armed Services Committee.

I suspect Dr Sean Kirkpatrick will be questioned and am awaiting confirmation.
Quote Tweet
Liberation Times
@LiberationTimes
·
Apr 4
NEW: Congress Prepares For UFO Hearings As Frustrations Escalate Among Politicians

https://liberationtimes.com/home/congress-prepares-for-ufo-hearings-as-frustrations-escalate-among-politicians

[boja]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExCpTBEA68Q

[ExomatrixTV]

UFOlogy Developments So Far... 2023 (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120439-UFOlogy-Developments-So-Far...-2023)
Live Congressional UFO-UAP Hearing May 17th 2022 (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118631-Live-Congressional-UFO-UAP-Hearing-May-17th-2022)
UAP Disclosure comments, opinions and other material (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?115419-UAP-Disclosure-comments-opinions-and-other-material)

UFO News Update: April 2023:
_o4Ye7ZUQWE

[ExomatrixTV]

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force Chief Reveals UFO Video Findings To Senate 2023

E2qvyxhdPQA
Sean M. Kirkpatrick, Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, testifies before the Senate Armed Forces Committee. Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more.


Pentagon Reveals Flying Orb During UFO Senate Hearing As 650 Unknown Objects Tracked:

BvO5BUTJ-SA
A Senate hearing of the Anomaly Resolution Office at the Department of Defense featured a video from the Middle East of an orb flying through the air observed by a US drone. Dr Sean Kirkpatrick from the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office at the Pentagon told a Senate Armed Services subcommittee on Wednesday that hundreds of instances of oddly shaped objects seen by US pilots are still being investigated. Most of the hundreds of cases being followed by the Pentagon are based on “readily explainable” data, he said.


U.S. tracking more than 650 potential UFOs

ZLZ0z8T-Io0
The U.S. government is tracking more than 650 potential unidentified flying objects, a Pentagon official confirmed Wednesday. David Martin reports.

[ExomatrixTV]

UFO Hearings in 24 Hours: New Updates! 🛸

FxEFV6kbTsw
The director of AARO, Sean Kirkpatrick will be the sole witness questioned at the upcoming UFO hearing chaired by senator Kirsten Gillibrand. This is UFO news in the making. I discuss some updates regarding it.

[ExomatrixTV]

AARO UAP Hearing 2023: More Spin :facepalm:


JE3DYm27M-I
On April 19, 2023, the SASC Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities Hearing was Chaired by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand relating to the progress of the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). This is the current iteration of the UAP Office in the Pentagon, headed by Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick. The result was as-expected for many followers of the UAP/UFO subject: lots of PR, no genuine assessment of the phenomenon. Richard M. Dolan, is one of the world's leading researchers and writers on UFOs.

[Bluegreen]

1648790192663166976
https://twitter.com/LtTimMcMillan/status/1648790192663166976

[onawah]

:bump: That does seem to be rather significant!
Though the sleepers probably won't even notice... :yawn:


1648790192663166976
https://twitter.com/LtTimMcMillan/status/1648790192663166976

[RatRodRob...RRR]

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force Chief Reveals UFO Video Findings To Senate 2023

E2qvyxhdPQA
Sean M. Kirkpatrick, Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, testifies before the Senate Armed Forces Committee. Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more.


Pentagon Reveals Flying Orb During UFO Senate Hearing As 650 Unknown Objects Tracked:

BvO5BUTJ-SA
A Senate hearing of the Anomaly Resolution Office at the Department of Defense featured a video from the Middle East of an orb flying through the air observed by a US drone. Dr Sean Kirkpatrick from the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office at the Pentagon told a Senate Armed Services subcommittee on Wednesday that hundreds of instances of oddly shaped objects seen by US pilots are still being investigated. Most of the hundreds of cases being followed by the Pentagon are based on “readily explainable” data, he said.


U.S. tracking more than 650 potential UFOs

ZLZ0z8T-Io0
The U.S. government is tracking more than 650 potential unidentified flying objects, a Pentagon official confirmed Wednesday. David Martin reports.

Hi John, the third vid (650 potential UFOs) isnt available in my country, is there a way i can get to watch that vid ...? ............................RRR

[ExomatrixTV]

...


google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs)
google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid)

[RatRodRob...RRR]

...


google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs)
google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid)


Thanx John
I feel that the word used "tracking" is the wrong one, perhaps it should be "investigating", but im not even sure they are really investigating 100%, maybe its more like "considering".
.
RRR

[Pris]

.
"Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force Chief Reveals UFO Video Findings To Senate 2023"...

Consider it all to be just another distraction from very important geo-political events going on right now that they DO NOT want the public to pay attention to. So much is being revealed right now. "Don't look here, look over there." Very convenient timing.


Styx shares his thoughts on this:

UFOs are Bull****

CUSS WARNING
iBxcZg1hGyjL

[Szymon]

...


google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs)
google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid)


Thanx John
I feel that the word used "tracking" is the wrong one, perhaps it should be "investigating", but im not even sure they are really investigating 100%, maybe its more like "considering".
.
RRR

RRR, Here is your https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZLZ0z8T-Io0

Looks like I cannot upload files with 4mb. Here try this. Let me know if it works.

https://streamable.com/8awx3i

Link will expire in one day.

Cheers,
Szymon

[RatRodRob...RRR]

...


google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs)
google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid)


Thanx John
I feel that the word used "tracking" is the wrong one, perhaps it should be "investigating", but im not even sure they are really investigating 100%, maybe its more like "considering".
.
RRR

RRR, Here is your https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZLZ0z8T-Io0

Looks like I cannot upload files with 4mb. Here try this. Let me know if it works.

https://streamable.com/8awx3i

Link will expire in one day.

Cheers,
Szymon

Yeah cheers Szymon, it worked no worries, there sure has been a concerted effort by media and gov in the last 10yrs heading toward some form of acknowledgement, but im getting tired of waiting........................RRR

[ExomatrixTV]

...



google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs)
google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid)



Thanx John
I feel that the word used "tracking" is the wrong one, perhaps it should be "investigating", but im not even sure they are really investigating 100%, maybe its more like "considering".
.
RRR


I did not make up that title

[ExomatrixTV]

...

I forgive StyxhexenHammer (https://www.youtube.com/@Styxhexenhammer666/videos) aka Scott Adams aka "Tarl Warwick (https://tarlwarwick.wordpress.com/)" using (or copying) well known Ufo-Pseudo-Skeptic (https://www.ufoskeptic.org/truzzi/) "narratives" claiming & framing things in a very specific way. :facepalm:

This can easily be countered IF you know what you're talking about ... and Scott Adams only uses a SUPER TINY FRACTION of the wealth of Real Scientific UFO Research.

Scott Adams is convinced "there is nothing to it" so why bother to investigate anything about UFOs ... Focussing only on the acronym: "U.F.O." ... thinking he is so "smart" explaining it in provable wrong way!

From an independent UFO investigator point of view: the label "UFO" can only be applied AFTER all common mundane explanations are ruled out ... Searching for all (possible) plausible explanations first before anything else. There is a long check-list officially made by United Sates Air Force (with help from Skeptic Dr. J. Allen Hynek (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Allen_Hynek)) that everybody can use ... and even add some of your own verification methods to scrutinize/asses/investigate all options.


So in essence: "Reporting a possible UFO" is NOT the same as a Real UFO ... That title has to be earned, not blindly given ... Same as trust!
Same for reporting a possible crime ... if that is often flawed, is no evidence that there are "no crimes".

Common mistake Scott Adams aka "StyxhexenHammer" (who I respect dearly!) made is: Only looking from a "witness" point of view and totally ignores dozens of profound other factors that gives more credence/merit to the reported UFO or not ... Depending on the quality of full investigation.


I have been on Dutch 🇳🇱 National Radio & TV 100s of times last 33 years and have debated all kinds of UFO "Debunkers" & UFO "Skeptics" ... Even co-founded: "Skepsiswatchers (https://web.archive.org/web/20040728172655/http://quest4wisdom.tripod.com/)" debunking the UFO Debunkers.
Co-founded 2 magazines discussing UFO Cases from all over the world.
Organized International UFO Conferences << all sold out >> and gave over 80 UFO lectures in 5 countries.

So I know why & how people use self-deception and self-censorship often without realizing it >>> "playing it safe" >> (falsely) assuming "common sense & basic logic" to downplay & generalize a very complex and controversial topic.

Sure, there are plenty who make mistakes, and mainstream media is KNOWN for picking the wrong UFO "cases" for a reason. To set "the narrative" it is all a "nothing burger" ... They even can use promising cases from the military & navy, but that too can be a decoy / a distraction of the real research happening ... Meanwhile, "official" cases eventually are "debunked" later on ... is all part of the plan/script. (PsyOp / Psychological Warfare).


And oh boy, what are UFO Pseudo-Skeptics (https://www.ufoskeptic.org/truzzi/) EAGER to use any excuse to dismiss it all!

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://whynotnews.eu/)

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://whynotnews.eu/) aka 'ExomatrixTV'
April 21th, 2023 🦜🦋🌳

[Michel Leclerc]

...

(...)


And oh boy, what are UFO Pseudo-Skeptics (https://www.ufoskeptic.org/truzzi/) EAGER to use any excuse to dismiss it all!

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://whynotnews.eu/)

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://whynotnews.eu/) aka 'ExomatrixTV'
April 21th, 2023 🦜🦋🌳

How right you are John, in restating the consequences of a truly “Popperian” approach in this indeed highly complex matter.

It may ultimately lead to the would be debunkers|fact checkers understanding that they have a formidable task ahead if they want to genuinely “falsify” the hypothesis that the unexplainable is “visiting” us.

If not, restating the prerequisites of sound thinking, tirelessly and relentlessly, is pedagogically effective for all young people who approach the field.

By the way, more than forty years ago I read Julien Weverbergh’s books on the topic – and have recently consulted again one. I remembered embracing his “epistemological stance” back then and am pleased to see that it has hardly aged. Would you agree with my retrospective assessment?

[ExomatrixTV]

...

(...)


And oh boy, what are UFO Pseudo-Skeptics (https://www.ufoskeptic.org/truzzi/) EAGER to use any excuse to dismiss it all!

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://whynotnews.eu/)

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://whynotnews.eu/) aka 'ExomatrixTV'
April 21th, 2023 🦜🦋🌳

How right you are John, in restating the consequences of a truly “Popperian” approach in this indeed highly complex matter.

It may ultimately lead to the would be debunkers|fact checkers understanding that they have a formidable task ahead if they want to genuinely “falsify” the hypothesis that the unexplainable is “visiting” us.

If not, restating the prerequisites of sound thinking, tirelessly and relentlessly, is pedagogically effective for all young people who approach the field.

By the way, more than forty years ago I read Julien Weverberg’s books on the topic – and have recently consulted again one. I remembered embracing his “epistemological stance” back then and am pleased to see that it has hardly aged. Would you agree with my retrospective assessment?

I studied all Julien Weverbergh’s UFO books in early 1990s ... and helped me a great deal seeing the bigger picture indeed!


https://images.marktplaats.com/api/v1/listing-mp-p/images/05/05e5e713-2799-4679-a521-5a052a6975de?rule=ecg_mp_eps$_86

UFO's in Oost en West (https://www.deslegte.com/ufo-s-in-oost-en-west-403120/), 1971 en 1973
De Nieuwe Ufogolf (https://www.deslegte.com/de-nieuwe-ufogolf-349744/), 1975
Ufonauten in opmars (https://www.bol.com/nl/nl/p/ufonauten-in-opmars/9200000033382634/), 1975
UFO's in het verleden. Een documentatie (https://www-bol-com.translate.goog/nl/nl/p/ufo-s-in-het-verleden/1001004005112553), 1980
De UFO-Saga (https://www.deslegte.com/de-ufo-saga-626135/), 1992
De UFO-Carrousel (https://www.bol.com/nl/nl/p/ufo-carrousel/666830282/), 1998

[ExomatrixTV]

https://curiosmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/UFO-over-Colombia-e1681476545357.png (https://curiosmos.com/pilot-speaks-out-exclusive-insight-into-startling-ufo-encounter-over-colombia/)

1648635185422909442
more info:


Impressive UFO Video: A Pilot Films A Strange Object While Flying (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/the-most-impressive-ufo-video-ever-a-pilot-films-a-strange-object-while-flying/articleshow/99640282.cms)

CrMxboII3tO
1646008608994328577


UFO Filmed By Pilot From The Cockpit Of The Plane Over Antioquia, Colombia

vKP1cRsNBLk
This Footage comes with no audio and was captured from the cockpit of this plane from an unknown location but when i get the information i will share it with you guys. In the footage we get a clear view of this object and this looks damn good. It seem to be a saucer shape craft. This is the Story behind the footage "The event took place on May 12th, 2022 Over Antioquia, Colombia, involving a Cessna T303 Crusader piloted by Jorge A. Arteaga. According to Jorge A. Arteaga, the object observed was not a balloon of any type, not a drone, and not any known object to him. He recorded a video of the sighting, which has been confirmed to be authentic. Arteaga recounts that the object was first seen floating stationary at a specific point between Medellin and Santa Fe. He and his co-pilot, Daniel, were flying towards Medellin when they noticed the object. As they approached the UAP, it suddenly moved towards them, prompting Arteaga to ask Daniel if he saw and heard it. Arteaga then turned the plane around, capturing the first video of the stationary object. As he was filming, the object moved slightly, and he began to "hunt" it with the aircraft. At this point, the UAP started moving towards them. Arteaga managed to avoid the object while flying at a speed of 130 to 140 knots, which is roughly over 300 kilometers per hour. He noted that had the object been a balloon, the aircraft's wake would have blown it away or disrupted its position. He also ruled out the possibility of it being a solar or helium balloon, as the sighting occurred at 12,500 feet with temperatures around 5 degrees Celsius. Arteaga expressed fear during the encounter, insisting that the object was neither a balloon, a drone, nor any known object to him."

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

Mysterious UFO Footage Has Joe Rogan Talking:

8HY3khMlbO0

[Pris]

...

I forgive StyxhexenHammer (https://www.youtube.com/@Styxhexenhammer666/videos) aka Scott Adams aka "Tarl Warwick (https://tarlwarwick.wordpress.com/)" using (or copying) well known Ufo-Pseudo-Skeptic (https://www.ufoskeptic.org/truzzi/) "narratives" claiming & framing things in a very specific way. :facepalm:

This can easily be countered IF you know what you're talking about ... and Scott Adams only uses a SUPER TINY FRACTION of the wealth of Real Scientific UFO Research.

Scott Adams is convinced "there is nothing to it" so why bother to investigate anything about UFOs ... Focussing only on the acronym: "U.F.O." ... thinking he is so "smart" explaining it in provable wrong way!

From an independent UFO investigator point of view: the label "UFO" can only be applied AFTER all common mundanes explanations are ruled out ... Searching for all (possible) plausible explanations first before anything else. There is a long check-list officially made by United Sate Air Force (with help from Skeptic Dr. J. Allen Hynek (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Allen_Hynek)) that everybody can use ... and even add some of your own verification methods to scrutinize/asses/investigate all options.


So in essence: "Reporting a possible UFO" is NOT the same as a Real UFO ... That title has to be earned, not blindly given ... Same as trust!
Same for reporting a possible crime ... if that is often flawed, is no evidence that there are "no crimes".

Common mistake Scott Adams aka "StyxhexenHammer" (who I respect dearly!) made is: Only looking from a "witness" point of view and totally ignores dozens of profound other factors that gives more credence/merit to the reported UFO or not ... Depending on the quality of full investigation.


I have been on Dutch 🇳🇱 National Radio & TV 100s of times last 33 years and have debated all kinds of UFO "Debunkers" & UFO "Skeptics" ... Even co-founded: "Skepsiswatchers (https://web.archive.org/web/20040728172655/http://quest4wisdom.tripod.com/)" debunking the UFO Debunkers.
Co-founded 2 magazines discussing UFO Cases from all over the world.
Organized International UFO Conferences << all sold out >> and gave over 80 UFO lectures in 5 countries.

So I know why & how people use self-deception and self-censorship often without realizing it >>> "playing it safe" >> (falsely) assuming "common sense & basic logic" to downplay & generalize a very complex and controversial topic.

Sure, there are plenty who make mistakes, and mainstream media is KNOWN for picking the wrong UFO "cases" for a reason. To set "the narrative" it is all a "nothing burger" ... They even can use promising cases from the military & navy, but that too can be a decoy / a distraction of the real research happening ... Meanwhile, "official" cases eventually are "debunked" later on ... is all part of the plan/script. (PsyOp / Psychological Warfare).


And oh boy, what are UFO Pseudo-Skeptics (https://www.ufoskeptic.org/truzzi/) EAGER to use any excuse to dismiss it all!

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://whynotnews.eu/)

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://whynotnews.eu/) aka 'ExomatrixTV'
April 21th, 2023 🦜🦋🌳



See, this is why I like Styx. He triggers people. He even triggers me. Sometimes, he misses the mark. But, I still like him. And, I like his cats.

Anyway, I didn't say UFOs are bull****. Styx said it. I don't think he meant it as a blanket statement but instead meant how it's being used on an unwary public at this moment in time. As far as I'm concerned, UFOs and psyops are so intertwined that they're practically the same thing.

My whole reason for sharing Styx's opinion was to point out that the UFO discussion right now is a DISTRACTION from what's being exposed at the moment geo-politically. Someone mentions UFO and everyone jumps into X-Files mode (hyperreality, predictive programming...). Who knows, maybe they'll activate their Project Blue Beam just for fun to mess with people's heads even more. Meanwhile, we are not supposed to pay any attention to the globalist agenda being exposed right now and that includes the number they pulled on the world in just the last couple of years. Crimes against humanity, Nuremberg Trials 2.0 kind of stuff.

[ExomatrixTV]

My Visit to DC for the Senate UAP Hearing - My Experience + Ask Me Anything:

H5K_iNmRh1I

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Common mistake Scott Adams aka "StyxhexenHammer" (who I respect dearly!) made is: Only looking from a "witness" point of view and totally ignores dozens of profound other factors that gives more credence/merit to the reported UFO or not ... Depending on the quality of full investigation.

I've seen many of his "takes" on things over the years, and very often he seems to make a lot of sense. But one thing ought to be borne in mind about him: a certain contradiction in his common-sense, and principled, forward-thinking opinions -- versus the sketchy nature of his background. He's a self-avowed satanist.

Such that, personally, once I learned this, I no longer wanted to hear from him. How much his ideology colours his opinion I don't know. But I doubt it's zero. Worth considering.

[ExomatrixTV]

Such that, personally, once I learned this, I no longer wanted to hear from him. How much his ideology colours his opinion I don't know. But I doubt it's zero. Worth considering.

Actually, (in my view) everybody CAN have his or her (flawed) moments depending on the expertise or lack thereof ... sharing the lesser, very limited, myopic views, opinions & insights that only helps to keep the bias in check ... talking like a gatekeeper without realizing it.

The most common reason could be that there ARE over the top gullible UFO "believers" demanding him to talk in a certain way and if he refuses to go along with the UFO "believers" he will be accused of being: a "shill", a "dis-info agent", "controlled opposition (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?117528-When-an-Accusation-like-Controlled-Opposition-loses-its-value-)" etc. etc.

If that happens often enough, he may mirror back his frustrations using generalizations too. It can also be he is really NOT informed about the real UFO research because he was told by his peers "it is a waste of (y)our time".

So there could be many reasons to be like that ... The main thing is that WE ALL can have our blind spots in other controversial complicated topics and become eventually wiser later on, that does not mean you "must" be a "bad person" overall ... You just are limited in certain areas of expertise ... Now tell me if you are "all knowing" and do "not" have (some of) this in your life with (a) certain complex topic(s).

Researchers of highly controversial topics that chose to have a massive reach in the public arena >>> getting massive justified but also unjustified "feedback" (accusations, smears, misrepresentations, innuendo etc. etc.) of all sorts 24/7 ... this PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE most other "(armchair) researchers" never experienced on a daily basis.

So for them, it is easy to be more "grounded" more "balanced" and demand certain higher standards from public colleague researchers who have the courage to do things they never did ... Always easy talk from the side-line.


"Let him who is without sin cast the first stone", John 8:7 (https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/k/kjv/kjv-idx?type=DIV2&byte=4800788) comes to mind.

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://whynotnews.eu/)

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://whynotnews.eu/) aka 'ExomatrixTV'
April 22th, 2023 🦜🦋🌳

[Pris]

Common mistake Scott Adams aka "StyxhexenHammer" (who I respect dearly!) made is: Only looking from a "witness" point of view and totally ignores dozens of profound other factors that gives more credence/merit to the reported UFO or not ... Depending on the quality of full investigation.

I've seen many of his "takes" on things over the years, and very often he seems to make a lot of sense. But one thing ought to be borne in mind about him: a certain contradiction in his common-sense, and principled, forward-thinking opinions -- versus the sketchy nature of his background. He's a self-avowed satanist.

Such that, personally, once I learned this, I no longer wanted to hear from him. How much his ideology colours his opinion I don't know. But I doubt it's zero. Worth considering.


Styx says he's no longer a Satanist. Perhaps, his experience made him wiser. He's very knowledgeable about the occult and is fascinated with linguistics let alone politics. And, his cats like him.

[ExomatrixTV]

Common mistake Scott Adams aka "StyxhexenHammer" (who I respect dearly!) made is: Only looking from a "witness" point of view and totally ignores dozens of profound other factors that gives more credence/merit to the reported UFO or not ... Depending on the quality of full investigation.

I've seen many of his "takes" on things over the years, and very often he seems to make a lot of sense. But one thing ought to be borne in mind about him: a certain contradiction in his common-sense, and principled, forward-thinking opinions -- versus the sketchy nature of his background. He's a self-avowed satanist.

Such that, personally, once I learned this, I no longer wanted to hear from him. How much his ideology colours his opinion I don't know. But I doubt it's zero. Worth considering.


Styx says he's no longer a Satanist. Perhaps, his experience made him wiser. He's very knowledgeable about the occult and is fascinated with linguistics let alone politics. And, his cats like him.

Actually, Styx was never a member of ANY "cult" group whatsoever! ... He studied "the occult" with a critical mind, when he was young, and saw many misperceptions & misrepresentations ... He even exposes multiple famous alleged "satanists" as fake and trolls ... He was/is not in to "worship" of any kind ... but most Christians do not care what the truth about him is and how he changed and why.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

I stand corrected! And I'm very glad to be, and to hear he's found his way on to a much brighter path. If there's a video with him talking about that would like to see it.

Edit:

found it (or something along those lines)
2W-LHEz3m_c

:focus:

[RatRodRob...RRR]

...



google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFOs)
google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid (https://www.google.com/search?q=U.S.+tracking+more+than+650+potential+UFO&source=lnms&tbm=vid)



Thanx John
I feel that the word used "tracking" is the wrong one, perhaps it should be "investigating", but im not even sure they are really investigating 100%, maybe its more like "considering".
.
RRR


I did not make up that title

Yeah i know, i was thanking you for your post and then went on to add my own thoughts...:happythumbsup:...................... RRR

[aoibhghaire]

In reference to the recent Senate Hearings, in particular ROSS COULTHART UPDATE ON CONGRESS WHISTLEBLOWERS. The complete version, Ross C. also says that Sen. Kelly was in the private hearing.

There also were few attendees in the public hearing and Sen Gillibrand was too mild for my liking.

Also , disappointingly, The media response has been almost nil. I think that personal belief systems are exacerbated around ambiguity and an objective approach to the otherworldly suffers.

It all depends on who has seen the second hearing. For many in the Scientific Coalition on UAPs it was a positive thing with Kirkpatrick a representative of good science.

Link to the latest Need to Know complete episode: https://youtu.be/0ZOSixfpq1Y

On the other hand, more revealing is expected rather soon by those well intended and well informed like John Ramirez who probably has known some of the witnesses that have come forward to USC. For John R., Kirkpatrick was not saying that there was no evidence of non human technologies that he had no evidence of extraterrestrial technology. In other words, it could be earth-based but non human.

c5vxjjciZEQ
A lot of things to contrast and assess.

[Kryztian]

Kim Iversen interviews Steven Greer. 1 hour 2 minutes.

3ja4jEhBXWo

If you have heard Greer's interviews before, there may not be that much that is new here. However, Greer has some upcoming projects and events:


June 10th & 11th, A conference in Washington D.C. and the screening of his movie "The Lost Century" about the suppression of free energy.

Monday, June 12, 2023 2:00 PM - 3:30 PM EDT - A national press club event where Greer will bring forth several new whistleblowers and will release information about secret government facilities.


From his website (https://siriusdisclosure.com/):


Here is a summary of only some of the witness testimony that will be presented at the conference:


1. Someone working for a contractor at the Dugway Proving grounds on different occasions saw: a hybrid ET being autopsied, the opening to a massive underground facility – over 1000 square miles, and a craft being worked on.

2 Another person was with a couple of Raytheon employees watching a UFO that seemed like a hologram, with them alluding to the fact that Raytheon had made it.

3. A contractor working at the South Pole who saw a neutrino light array used to track UFOs

4. A military guy saw an ARV (man-made UFO – alien reproduction vehicle) being used for drug trafficking.

[Kryztian]

Richard Dolan breaks down the latest leaked document on the alleged "Immaculate Constellation" program in the United States. (40 minutes)

vuw5h8bBOBM

[onawah]

I am rethinking the experience I described that night since watching the Rumble video here:
https://rumble.com/v6qfjwo-space-fence-and-mind-control-conversation-with-elana-freeland-tss-52.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Plasmoid UAPs may be "apparitions" that "Contactees" are now actually creating themselves.


I will add that, however ill-intentioned branding Unidentified Flying Objects with the new term "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena" may be, I think in some cases at least, UAP is more accurate.
(Although that still doesn't include such objects appearing underwater.)
In one of my Contact experiences, what I saw was a very bright light that suddenly appeared directly above me, in a clear night sky, with no physical craft in evidence at all, and there was no sound at all.
It blinked 3 times in the same sequence as the flashlight with which I had been signaling the sky, and then was no more.
I don't think there was an object there at all, but it was a phenomena, though I can only surmise that something or someone was apparently capable of making that light appear there.
(And that was apparently at my request, since it occurred on one of the nights designated for the international CE5 group to go out and try to make Contact, and I had been meditating and making a request for Contact on that night for about a month up to that time.)
There was another person present who witnessed the 3rd flash of light (he was busy trying to build a fire, and so missed the first 2.)
But his description matched the same thing I saw, and I think many other Contactees have had similar sightings.

I wish that there wasn't such scary background music added to videos about Contact experiences, and weird sound effects. Adding fear to the equation isn't helpful.
The experience described above wasn't scary at all, but very uplifting and inspiring.
Though another Contact sighting I had, on a subsequent CE5 night, was a very low-flying cigar-shaped metallic craft that glowed with a cobalt blue light, and I didn't get a positive feeling from that one, more of a military kind of vibe.
I wouldn't say it was scary, but it definitely made me think again about going out alone on that kind of errand, as I had done on that second night.
v6o7n74/?pub=4

[Kryztian]

I have been discovering the work of Jason Samosa, a ufologist who has a comparable level of intelligence, knowledge and the ability for sensible speculation as Richard Dolan. Two excellent videos here:

#1 The UFO Disclosure Iceberg - why, since December of 2017, are we now being told that we have to believe in UFOs. After so many years of secrecy and ridicule, why does it seem like "they" are finally letting the cat out of the bag. There are many competing theories here, some of them quite disturbing.

NT1xt-_Z8v8


#2 Tom DeLonge & UFOs - I followed some of his interviews for some time but as of late, he has seemed to disappear from the scene. DeLonge mentioned many mysterious figures, generals, etc. who gave him information but was not able to name them. Samosa thinks he has figured out who many of them are and it ads quite a bit to the story.

53jDHVnqj0w