FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

[mojo]

Another sad day for our institutions. Myself and others have lost trust in them. I'm not sure what the real statistics would show us about the harmful effects of the vax, but I do know the insert on the Covid vax does not list ingredients. How will FDA approve the shot without this knowledge?



The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Monday granted full approval to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for individuals 16 years and older.

"The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic," Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock said in a statement issued Monday. "While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product."

[Ankle Biter]

This will help with the imminent mandates.

Rigorous scientific testing doesn't instil the confidence in people as it once used to. So many institutions feel and come across as compromised.

[thepainterdoug]

Im beginning to really feel its over. They have put alot of time and planning into this operation for many years. they have checked off all the variable on the list and have accounted for everything.
And with the VAERS numbers they still push this through? Really?
They will be able to force this on everyone now. Its a lawless country now, no one to turn to, no authority I can believe in. This is very very dangerous

Im pulling for the Australian Truckers who will be creating a blockaid on I believe the 31st. To take thier country back from these criminals.

[Bill Ryan]

I do know the insert on the Covid vax does not list ingredients. How will FDA approve the shot without this knowledge?


If I understand this right (can anyone confirm?), if it's approved then they have to list the ingredients.
Let the lawsuits begin. :)

[mojo]

FDA warns against ivermectin as COVID treatment


People should never take drugs formulated for animals, the FDA warned

I'm about to blow a gasket... They are complaining people are taking animal medicine. It's not that we went about trying to hurt our bodies, FDA has done absolutely nothing to provide access to therapeutics.


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reiterated a warning against the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment amid growing reports of individuals taking the drug often used to treat parasitic worms in animals.

Mississippi state health officials issued a recent alert prompted by increasing calls of people with potential ivermectin exposure taken to prevent or treat COVID-19 infection. While the drug has FDA-approval for certain uses in animals and humans, over 70% of the recent calls involved livestock formulations, officials said.

The FDA previously issued concerns over self-medication with ivermectin intended for animals, noting some people might mistakenly believe the drug can substitute for ivermectin intended for humans.

[mojo]

WpuBpEh48dU

[jaybee]

Another sad day for our institutions. Myself and others have lost trust in them. I'm not sure what the real statistics would show us about the harmful effects of the vax, but I do know the insert on the Covid vax does not list ingredients. How will FDA approve the shot without this knowledge?



The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Monday granted full approval to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for individuals 16 years and older.

"The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic," Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock said in a statement issued Monday. "While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product."


That woman... Janet Woodcock... is either living in cloud cuckoo land or she is a shameless (and dangerous) liar...

But we should expect no less now as people in key positions of authority around the world throw us to the wolves and literally don't give a damn about having any personal integrity or speaking the truth about anything -

Just mind boggling how treacherous they are... :facepalm:

[Denise/Dizi]

FDA warns against ivermectin as COVID treatment


People should never take drugs formulated for animals, the FDA warned

I'm about to blow a gasket... They are complaining people are taking animal medicine. It's not that we went about trying to hurt our bodies, FDA has done absolutely nothing to provide access to therapeutics.


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reiterated a warning against the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment amid growing reports of individuals taking the drug often used to treat parasitic worms in animals.

Mississippi state health officials issued a recent alert prompted by increasing calls of people with potential ivermectin exposure taken to prevent or treat COVID-19 infection. While the drug has FDA-approval for certain uses in animals and humans, over 70% of the recent calls involved livestock formulations, officials said.

The FDA previously issued concerns over self-medication with ivermectin intended for animals, noting some people might mistakenly believe the drug can substitute for ivermectin intended for humans.

I like the way they tilt the media to acknowledge that Ivermectin is used to treat worms in livestock, as if they want the public to believe it has no human uses.... but they do not make note that the human version of Ivermectin is working, when it comes to being used prior to hospitalization in studies in human form. As well as speeding up the recovery of those in critical care units. My husband went from critical condition to going home in 3 days after demanding Ivermectin in the ICU..

They neglect to tell people that ivermectin works, and instead try to paint those who are aware of it, and treating themselves any way they can, as fools... As the medical establishment does not want to lose the $3,000 per course of treatment for Remdesivir for a treatment of Ivermectin that keeps them out of the hospital, AND costs less than a dollar a dose.

The stores in my area now are requiring that you provide all kinds of personal identification if you buy livestock ivermectin. Including your address and drivers license. I bet those "Calls" the FDA are receiving, are calls asking how to adjust the doses making it ok for human consumption, as the patients cannot get their Dr.s to prescribe it... . Those taking the calls should see this as an outcry AGAINST the status quo, and be alarmed that they're "wealth care" system, is fully known at this point, and well being is the last thing they care about. If they continue to keep ivermectin from the public I think I will really begin to question anything any Dr. prescribes.

It's shameful and criminal, that the FDA and those treating this pandemic, are keeping the real medications that work, out of the hands of those that desperately need it.

[Bill Ryan]

Mike Adams takes a close look at this, very much in his own style, in his new Situation Update for today.

https://www.brighteon.com/4614e124-31d4-4299-a3d0-409c2dd12dd8

4614e124-31d4-4299-a3d0-409c2dd12dd8

[Savannah]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/bidens-surgeon-general-says-covid-vaccine-fda-approval-will-likely-lead-mandates-video/

Biden’s Surgeon General Vivek Murthy on Sunday said the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer vaccine will likely lead to more vaccine mandates.

According to reports, the FDA is expected to approve Pfizer’s Covid vaccine on Monday.
Up until now the FDA has been able to distribute the Covid vaccines under “emergency use authorization.”

Vivek Murthy told CNN’s Brianna Keilar on Sunday that businesses and universities will likely be able to impose more mandates with the FDA’s vaccine approval.
There are universities and businesses that have been considering putting in vaccine requirements in order to create a safer — a workplace, a learning environment,” Murthy said.

“I think this announcement from the FDA would likely encourage them and make them feel more comfortable in putting some requirements in place,” he added.

[Delight]

FDA warns against ivermectin as COVID treatment


People should never take drugs formulated for animals, the FDA warned

I'm about to blow a gasket... They are complaining people are taking animal medicine. It's not that we went about trying to hurt our bodies, FDA has done absolutely nothing to provide access to therapeutics.


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reiterated a warning against the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment amid growing reports of individuals taking the drug often used to treat parasitic worms in animals.

Mississippi state health officials issued a recent alert prompted by increasing calls of people with potential ivermectin exposure taken to prevent or treat COVID-19 infection. While the drug has FDA-approval for certain uses in animals and humans, over 70% of the recent calls involved livestock formulations, officials said.

The FDA previously issued concerns over self-medication with ivermectin intended for animals, noting some people might mistakenly believe the drug can substitute for ivermectin intended for humans.

I doubt that there is much difference between human and animal meds. The issue with the paste I bought is DOSAGE. It is for horses and we need a miniscule amount compared to the measured dosage of the syringe. I have heard but it is not verified that human pills have had a formulation change. NEVER give the horse Ivermectin to a dog as it is a higher concentration than a dog can tolerate and very hard to measure (for heart worm treatment).

The issue IMO is the concentration with Ivermectin. If I could not get human brands, I would use animal meds.


FDA Requirements (https://www.verywellhealth.com/are-animal-medications-safe-for-humans-1124030)
Many drugs sold or dispensed by veterinarians for the treatment of illness in small domestic animals are generic equivalents of human drugs. For example, a pet can have an inflammatory condition and take prednisone for this condition—the same medication humans can get with a physician’s prescription.2

However, medications produced for livestock and intended to be mixed with feed may not undergo the same level of manufacturing scrutiny by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as human drugs do.3 These products may have more impurities that don't represent a health concern for the animals but could be a risk for people.

I cannot describe the feeling I am having over this FDA approval of the jab. Now at least we MUST know what is in it and maybe we can sue.

[mojo]

Dr. Roger Hodkinson calls out the Covid hoax.

Wow logical thinking ... the video is 4 minutes long

https://t.me/HATSTRUTH/1486

https://brighteon.com/2cb95f1a-0e44-41ce-9cc6-d59e5d5c8fbd

2cb95f1a-0e44-41ce-9cc6-d59e5d5c8fbd

[Sue (Ayt)]

Biden just gave a live speech about it:
ZE6C90nG7AE

Watch and Weep
:facepalm:
**edit to add that I am enjoying watching the down-votes tally up.

[Delight]

I bet those "Calls" the FDA are receiving, are calls asking how to adjust the doses making it ok for human consumption, as the patients cannot get their Dr.s to prescribe it... Those taking the calls should see this as an outcry AGAINST the status quo, and be alarmed that they're "wealth care" system, is fully known at this point, and well being is the last thing they care about. If they continue to keep ivermectin from the public I think I will really begin to question anything any Dr. prescribes.

It's shameful and criminal, that the FDA and those treating this pandemic, are keeping the real medications that work, out of the hands of those that desperately need it.

I think we ALL must start BOYCOTTING the medical industrial complex. We also MUST turn to a spiritual level of connection. The reason is that the material world has apparently been fully taken over by the (I DON"T KNOW WHAT IT IS). Lets call "IT" out as all antithetical to LIFE.

"IT" has run rough shod over the individual people in the ALL systems because we developed wide enough coordination globally to effect change simultaneously. NOW "IT" is ramping up to implode the whole DELIBERATELY. Individuals are targeted by the same screws we always succombed to like OUR fear of pain, death, poverty, illness, suffering. The individuals add up to a collective "mind". That is why we must overcome ourselves. It may not save the world but we will go down as humans and not tools.

The PLAN is to destroy EVERYTHING. The word "rubber stamped" means that the end aim will automatically approve the steps because the DEPARTMENTS of civilization managing our life systems are all controlled now. THE PRONGS IN THE PITCHFORK ARE POKING US.

Only a spiritual door will carry us out of the harm. The harm is much greater than death. If we knew this FOR SURE, we would be brave hearts and blithe spirits and we'd have a chance. However, we believe the LIE that IF YOU "cooperate, be a nice person, believe the story, and all will be OK"

NO IT WON"T.

[Denise/Dizi]

FDA warns against ivermectin as COVID treatment


People should never take drugs formulated for animals, the FDA warned

I'm about to blow a gasket... They are complaining people are taking animal medicine. It's not that we went about trying to hurt our bodies, FDA has done absolutely nothing to provide access to therapeutics.


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reiterated a warning against the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment amid growing reports of individuals taking the drug often used to treat parasitic worms in animals.

Mississippi state health officials issued a recent alert prompted by increasing calls of people with potential ivermectin exposure taken to prevent or treat COVID-19 infection. While the drug has FDA-approval for certain uses in animals and humans, over 70% of the recent calls involved livestock formulations, officials said.

The FDA previously issued concerns over self-medication with ivermectin intended for animals, noting some people might mistakenly believe the drug can substitute for ivermectin intended for humans.

I doubt that there is much difference between human and animal meds. The issue with the paste I bought is DOSAGE. It is for horses and we need a miniscule amount compared to the measured dosage of the syringe. I have heard but it is not verified that human pills have had a formulation change. NEVER give the horse Ivermectin to a dog as it is a higher concentration than a dog can tolerate and very hard to measure (for heart worm treatment).

The issue IMO is the concentration with Ivermectin. If I could not get human brands, I would use animal meds.



I cannot describe the feeling I am having over this FDA approval of the jab. Now at least we MUST know what is in it and maybe we can sue.

They have a monthly heartworm medication for dogs, 12 doses per package, given once a month, and it is ivermectin. Easy to get from a vet for heart health... I have two packages of it for my shih tzus in the medicine cabinet. It is given by weight as well, in chewable tablets.

But as far as the horse ivermectin? The dose IS important, and there are veternarians, and vet techs, that are helping to get the adjustment properly for humans. I cannot name names for obvious reasons. Most people that raise or board horses in my area, use the ivermectin all the time, and have it stocked in their homes... . And they're telling those that are unaware that they do this and the proper dosages..

People need to be aware that the horse ivermectin has different solutions, some 1.87%, some less, and this also must be taken into account when seeking the proper dose for self care. I won't recommend it, but I will say I took a course of treatment, and it sure worked for me. And when my husband demanded it at the hospital, he recovered very quickly. Once he signed papers releasing the Dr. of copability for changing his treatment protocol, the Dr. went on to tell him that indeed hospitals in Sacramento, California... (Our state capital), was using ivermecrin with great success...

He went from 65 liters of forced oxygen, to 2 liters of "blow by" oxygen in 3 days and was sent home to recover after only 3 doses of ivermectin. Granted he had been there 6 days prior, but not really getting better up to that point.

If Dr.s are afraid of blowback by prescribing it, people have no options really. Other than to seek out alternative versions of it.

As far as the FDA approving the "Jab"... (I won't call it a vaccine, because it isn't a true vaccine when defined)... My body is off limits. I choose what I put into it. I would fight to avoid anyone sticking something in my body that I do not approve of. Just because the FDA approved it's use, does not give them my permission to use it on me.. And I feel if they try to force the issue, it will get ugly

[Delight]

They have a monthly heartworm medication for dogs, 12 doses per package, given once a month, and it is ivermectin. Easy to get from a vet for heart health... I have two packages of it for my shih tzus in the medicine cabinet. It is given by weight as well, in chewable tablets.

But as far as the horse ivermectin? The dose IS important, and there are veternarians, and vet techs, that are helping to get the adjustment properly for humans. I cannot name names for obvious reasons. Most people that raise or board horses in my area, use the ivermectin all the time, and have it stocked in their homes... . And they're telling those that are unaware that they do this and the proper dosages..

People need to be aware that the horse ivermectin has different solutions, some 1.87%, some less, and this also must be taken into account when seeking the proper dose for self care.

There is a 1% Ivermectin solution for cow shots that can be titrated safely for dogs by mouth. People can tolerate the horse paste. Of course we cannot recommend it.

[onawah]

Breaking: FDA gives full approval to COVID vaccines; no public hearing; no transparency; no open review of vaccine data t
It all happened behind closed doors
by Jon Rappoport
August 23, 2021

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/23/fda-gives-full-approval-to-covid-vaccines-no-public-hearing-no-transparency/

"The fix is in.

We raced from “emergency use authorization” of experimental vaccines to “full approval.” Boom.

Despite the promise of “transparency” prior to giving full approval to the COVID vaccines, the FDA gave its final green light today. Slam-dunk.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine

And there was NO public hearing.

“Full approval” means the vaccine marketing/intimidation/mandate campaigns will ramp up much higher. “Well, now there is NO reason for anyone to refuse the shot. The FDA states it is completely safe and effective.”

Obviously, the FDA didn’t want to allow even mainstream “experts” to speak in a public hearing before approval; the agency is running a very tight ship. No slip-ups. No defections.

An 8/20 article in the BMJ https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2086
...(“Covid-19: FDA set to grant full approval to Pfizer vaccine without public discussion of data”) quotes a few of these dissenting mainstream pros. For example:

“Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinising the data.”

“’These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorisation,’ she said. ‘The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing. These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled, and data scrutinised in advance of an approval’.”

“Witczak is one of the more than 30 signatories of a citizen petition calling on the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year to gather more data. She warned that without a [public FDA] meeting ‘we have no idea what the data looks like’.”

“’It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years,’ she said. ‘There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed’.”

“’Full approval of covid-19 vaccines must be done in an open public forum for all to see. It could set a precedent of lowered standards for future vaccine approvals’.”

Understand—this devastating criticism of the FDA is coming from a person who operates WITHIN the public-health establishment.

Amidst a tsunami of reports of vaccine injuries and deaths from around the world, the FDA is proving it is an agency that will certify maiming and killing without hesitation."

Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111445-Jon-Rappoport-on-the-Covid-Hoax&p=1447873&viewfull=1#post1447873

[Victoria]

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download



Our STN: BL 125742/0 BLA APPROVAL

BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH August 23, 2021
Attention: Amit Patel
Pfizer Inc.
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017

Dear Mr. Patel:

Please refer to your Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted and received on
May 18, 2021, under section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) for
COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA.

LICENSING

U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
w w w.fda.gov
We are issuing Department of Health and Human Services U.S. License No. 2229 to
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, Mainz, Germany, under the provisions of section
351(a) of the PHS Act controlling the manufacture and sale of biological products. The
license authorizes you to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce,
those products for which your company has demonstrated compliance with
establishment and product standards. Under this license, you are authorized to manufacture the product, COVID-19 Vaccine,
mRNA, which is indicated for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
in individuals 16 years of age and older. The review of this product was associated with the following National Clinical Trial
(NCT) numbers: NCT04368728 and NCT04380701.

MANUFACTURING LOCATIONS
Under this license, you are approved to manufacture COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA drug
substance at The final formulated product will be manufactured, filled,
labeled and packaged at Pfizer

. The diluent, 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, will be manufactured at

(b) (4)(b) (4)(b) (4)
Page 2 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins

You may label your product with the proprietary name, COMIRNATY, and market it in
2.0 mL glass vials, in packages of 25 and 195 vials. We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products
Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA, including
the clinical study design and trial results, did not raise concerns or controversial issues
that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion.
DATING PERIOD
The dating period for COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA shall be 9 months from the date of
manufacture when stored between -90ºC to -60ºC (-130ºF to -76ºF). The date of
manufacture shall be no later than the date of final sterile filtration of the formulated
drug product (at , the date
of manufacture is defined as the date of sterile filtration for the final drug product; at
Pfizer , it is defined as the date of the

Following the final sterile filtration,
, no
reprocessing/reworking is allowed without prior approval from the Agency. The dating
period for your drug substance shall be when stored at We have
approved the stability protocols in your license application for the purpose of extending
the expiration dating period of your drug substance and drug product under 21 CFR
601.12.
FDA LOT RELEASE
Please submit final container samples of the product in final containers together with
protocols showing results of all applicable tests. You may not distribute any lots of
product until you receive a notification of release from the Director, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER).
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT DEVIATIONS
You must submit reports of biological product deviations under 21 CFR 600.14. You
should identify and investigate all manufacturing deviations promptly, including those
associated with processing, testing, packaging, labeling, storage, holding and
distribution. If the deviation involves a distributed product, may affect the safety, purity,
or potency of the product, and meets the other criteria in the regulation, you must
submit a report on Form FDA 3486 to the Director, Office of Compliance and Biologics
Quality, electronically through the eBPDR web application or at the address below.
Links for the instructions on completing the electronic form (eBPDR) may be found on
CBER's web site at https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/report-problem-center-
biologics-evaluation-research/biological-product-deviations: Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Document Control Center (b) (4)(b) (4)(b) (4)(b) (4)(b) (4)(b) (4)
Page 3 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
WO71-G112
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

MANUFACTURING CHANGES

You must submit information to your BLA for our review and written approval under 21
CFR 601.12 for any changes in, including but not limited to, the manufacturing, testing,
packaging or labeling of COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA, or in the manufacturing facilities.


LABELING
We hereby approve the draft content of labeling including Package Insert, submitted
under amendment 74, dated August 21, 2021, and the draft carton and container labels
submitted under amendment 63, dated August 19, 2021.
CONTENT OF LABELING
As soon as possible, but no later than 14 days from the date of this letter, please submit
the final content of labeling (21 CFR 601.14) in Structured Product Labeling (SPL)
format via the FDA automated drug registration and listing system, (eLIST) as described
at http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StructuredProductLabeling/
default.htm. Content of labeling must be identical to the Package Insert submitted on
August 21, 2021. Information on submitting SPL files using eLIST may be found in the
guidance for industry SPL Standard for Content of Labeling Technical Qs and As at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guida
nces/UCM072392.pdf. The SPL will be accessible via publicly available labeling repositories.
CARTON AND CONTAINER LABELS
Please electronically submit final printed carton and container labels identical to the
carton and container labels submitted on August 19, 2021, according to the guidance
for industry Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format — Certain Human
Pharmaceutical Product Applications and Related Submissions Using the eCTD
Specifications at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-
documents/providing-regulatory-submissions-electronic-format-certain-human-
pharmaceutical-product-applications. All final labeling should be submitted as Product Correspondence to this BLA STN BL
125742 at the time of use and include implementation information on Form FDA 356h.
ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL LABELING

Page 4 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins

You may submit two draft copies of the proposed introductory advertising and
promotional labeling with Form FDA 2253 to the Advertising and Promotional Labeling
Branch at the following address: Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Document Control Center 10903 New Hampshire Ave. WO71-G112 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 You must submit copies of your final advertising and promotional labeling at the time of
initial dissemination or publication, accompanied by Form FDA 2253 (21 CFR
601.12(f)(4)). All promotional claims must be consistent with and not contrary to approved labeling.
You should not make a comparative promotional claim or claim of superiority over other
products unless you have substantial evidence or substantial clinical experience to
support such claims (21 CFR 202.1(e)(6)).
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING
You must submit adverse experience reports in accordance with the adverse
experience reporting requirements for licensed biological products (21 CFR 600.80),
and you must submit distribution reports at monthly intervals as described in 21 CFR
600.81. For information on adverse experience reporting, please refer to the guidance
for industry Providing Submissions in Electronic Format —Postmarketing Safety
Reports for Vaccines at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-
guidance-documents/providing-submissions-electronic-format-postmarketing-safety-
reports-vaccines. For information on distribution reporting, please refer to the guidance
for industry Electronic Submission of Lot Distribution Reports at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation
/Post-MarketActivities/LotReleases/ucm061966.htm.
PEDIATRIC REQUIREMENTS

Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) (21 U.S.C. 355c), all applications for
new active ingredients, new indications, new dosage forms, new dosing regimens, or
new routes of administration are required to contain an assessment of the safety and
effectiveness of the product for the claimed indication in pediatric patients unless this
requirement is waived, deferred, or inapplicable. We are deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16 years
for this application because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16
years of age and older, and the pediatric studies for younger ages have not been
completed.
Page 5 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins

Your deferred pediatric studies required under section 505B(a) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) are required postmarketing studies. The status of
these postmarketing studies must be reported according to 21 CFR 601.28 and section
505B(a)(4)(C) of the FDCA. In addition, section 506B of the FDCA and 21 CFR 601.70
require you to report annually on the status of any postmarketing commitments or
required studies or clinical trials.
Label your annual report as an “Annual Status Report of Postmarketing Study
Requirement/Commitments” and submit it to the FDA each year within 60 calendar
days of the anniversary date of this letter until all Requirements and Commitments
subject to the reporting requirements under section 506B of the FDCA are released or
fulfilled. These required studies are listed below:

1. Deferred pediatric Study C4591001 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in children 12 years through 15 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: October 7, 2020

Study Completion: May 31, 2023

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2023

2. Deferred pediatric Study C4591007 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants and children 6 months to <12 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: February 8, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

3. Deferred pediatric Study C4591023 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants <6 months of age.

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: July 31, 2024 Final Report Submission: October 31, 2024 Submit the protocols to your IND 19736, with a cross-reference letter to this BLA STN
BL 125742 explaining that these protocols were submitted to the IND. Please refer to
the PMR sequential number for each study/clinical trial and the submission number as
shown in this letter. Submit final study reports to this BLA STN BL 125742. In order for your PREA PMRs to
be considered fulfilled, you must submit and receive approval of an efficacy or a labeling
Page 6 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins
supplement. For administrative purposes, all submissions related to these required
pediatric postmarketing studies must be clearly designated as:

• Required Pediatric Assessment(s)

We note that you have fulfilled the pediatric study requirement for ages 16 through 17
years for this application.

POSTMARKETING REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 505(o)

Section 505(o) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) authorizes FDA to
require holders of approved drug and biological product applications to conduct
postmarketing studies and clinical trials for certain purposes, if FDA makes certain
findings required by the statute (section 505(o)(3)(A), 21 U.S.C. 355(o)(3)(A)).

We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events
reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known
serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of
subclinical myocarditis. Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under
section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks. Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are
required to conduct the following studies: 4. Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of
the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate
the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of
COMIRNATY. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021 Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022 Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023 Study Completion: June 30, 2025 Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025 5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval Active Surveillance Study
Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus
Page 7 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins

Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis
and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 11, 2021

Progress Report Submission: September 30, 2021

Interim Report 1 Submission: March 31, 2022

Interim Report 2 Submission: September 30, 2022

Interim Report 3 Submission: March 31, 2023

Interim Report 4 Submission: September 30, 2023

Interim Report 5 Submission: March 31, 2024

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

6. Study C4591021 substudy to describe the natural history of myocarditis and
pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.
We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022 Study Completion: March 31, 2024 Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024 7. Study C4591036, a prospective cohort study with at least 5 years of follow-up for
potential long-term sequelae of myocarditis after vaccination (in collaboration
with Pediatric Heart Network). We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021 Study Completion: December 31, 2026
Page 8 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2027

8. Study C4591007 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of the second dose of COMIRNATY in a
subset of participants 5 through 15 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this assessment according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: September 30, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024 9. Study C4591031 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of a third dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of
participants 16 to 30 years of age. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021 Study Completion: June 30, 2022 Final Report Submission: December 31, 2022 Please submit the protocols to your IND 19736, with a cross-reference letter to this BLA
STN BL 125742 explaining that these protocols were submitted to the IND. Please refer to the PMR sequential number for each study/clinical trial and the submission number
as shown in this letter.

Please submit final study reports to the BLA. If the information in the final study report
supports a change in the label, the final study report must be submitted as a
supplement to this BLA STN BL 125742. For administrative purposes, all submissions
related to these postmarketing studies required under section 505(o) must be submitted
to this BLA and be clearly designated as:

• Required Postmarketing Correspondence under Section 505(o)
• Required Postmarketing Final Report under Section 505(o)
• Supplement contains Required Postmarketing Final Report under Section
505(o)

Section 505(o)(3)(E)(ii) of the FDCA requires you to report periodically on the status of
any study or clinical trial required under this section. This section also requires you to
periodically report to FDA on the status of any study or clinical trial otherwise

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

[Denise/Dizi]

They have a monthly heartworm medication for dogs, 12 doses per package, given once a month, and it is ivermectin. Easy to get from a vet for heart health... I have two packages of it for my shih tzus in the medicine cabinet. It is given by weight as well, in chewable tablets.

But as far as the horse ivermectin? The dose IS important, and there are veternarians, and vet techs, that are helping to get the adjustment properly for humans. I cannot name names for obvious reasons. Most people that raise or board horses in my area, use the ivermectin all the time, and have it stocked in their homes... . And they're telling those that are unaware that they do this and the proper dosages..

People need to be aware that the horse ivermectin has different solutions, some 1.87%, some less, and this also must be taken into account when seeking the proper dose for self care.

There is a 1% Ivermectin solution for cow shots that can be titrated safely for dogs by mouth. People can tolerate the horse paste. Of course we cannot recommend it.

I was going to suggest that as well...just for informational purposes. Most online sites such as Amazon are either quickly running out of the injectable liquid, or charging a fortune for it...For example it went from $39.95 to $109.95 a bottle.... And I was only able to find one person selling it on Amazon as of this morning...

I found it on this site for $39.95 ... plus $3.99 shipping... These have a stopper at the top that will require a needle to pierce it, and draw out the proper dose... and keep it safe for reuse later, but you can then just unscrew the needle tip and use the tube as the dispenser for your canine.


https://vic.pharmacy/

The stores are now requiring personal information for tracking purposes of those buying the paste. (I took apple flavored IverCare, as it didn't taste as bad as the others, and was 1.87%, without all of the other unnecessary medications added to it. )

[Denise/Dizi]

How can they approve this "immunization" when it is already proven so ineffective that even "Vaccinated" people are still getting CoVid, spreading it, AND requiring additional "Booster Vaccines"? Which by the way, do not stop people from getting, spreading or suffering the virus, but "Might" limit the amount of damage the virus does. Keeping them a small bit safer from the ICU, but no guarantees.

The insanity of it all is just astonishing. There seems to be no effort to treat or stop the virus from damaging the population other than "vaccinating", when they do have methods that can diminsh the damage caused by the virus, and in many cases, keep people out of the hospitals almost entirely... Prophylactic treatments seem to be deliberately overlooked in this situation. People are not being told that there are things that can be given that may help them both survive the virus, but also to limit the amount of illness being suffered, as it kills the virus sooner, so it doesn't spread as far... without having to get the shots.

What is troublesome, is the whole vaccine passport id program. Those who do not get it, will be choked out of work, out of traveling, out of schools. Those wanting to work, will be forced to take the jab if those employers are regulated to provide proof their employees are vaccinated. As it is, they're already suggesting that they will have concerts again, so long as the attendees all have proof they were vaccinated. It's ridiculous. As they will still be spreading it among themselves and bringing it back to their communities.

I just cannot believe that the FDA approved the "vaccine" at all, with all of the deaths and side effects. While everyone was worried about being "Chipped" they just rolled this out and easily frightened the populations into phone tracking, taking shots that harm the population , etc.. The fact that so many are really just shaming their neighbors for not getting the vaccine? Is an indicator that this is heading in an ugly direction.

I will be following this thread intently.

[Open Minded Dude]

Sheeple1: "Hm, so it is only approved now? Why did I take it then?"
Sheeple2: "Nah. Nevermind. Just do what the authorities tell you. They know what's best. (proud) I'll get my third shot in a week from now."
Sheeple1: "Yeah, haha, you're right. (smirks) Too much thinking about stuff like this makes my brain hurt anyway."
Sheeple2: "I am so proud of my collection now. What good is a vax passport if you don't fill it in, hehe?"
Sheeple2: "Yeah, haha, right. I want my third shot, too. So cool."
:facepalm:

[Denise/Dizi]

The people in my area have created a facebook page for the area, and the first thing they said was... "See LOOK! Now it is approved, so now no one has any reason NOT to get the shot".

UGH...

The thought process of these people scares me honestly. Not for myself but for the future of the world, and those that are willingly being guinea pigs for this rollout. The neurological damage, the jerking, the brain bleeds, blood clots, and the deaths are an indicator to me that this is NOT the answer...

[jaybee]

The people in my area have created a facebook page for the area, and the first thing they said was... "See LOOK! Now it is approved, so now no one has any reason NOT to get the shot".

UGH...

The thought process of these people scares me honestly. Not for myself but for the future of the world, and those that are willingly being guinea pigs for this rollout. The neurological damage, the jerking, the brain bleeds, blood clots, and the deaths are an indicator to me that this is NOT the answer...


If the predictions / prognosis made by various doctors and specialists in their field for those who have taken the jab - ie early death (maybe 2 -5 years..? ) and / or infertility... is correct....

That means that the Unvaccinated will inherit the world - -

'They' are giving it everything they've got to push people into getting jabbed because that is the logical conclusion - - but they must have factored this in to their diabolical plans which is where it could get dangerous for the 'vaccine hesitant'...... but how can they get rid of the unvaccinated ...... perhaps they can't.....

In the war on the people by the power mad elite...the war leading, they hope, to depopulation, transhumanism and TOTAL control and total surveillance - 'Vaccination' could be the decisive battle- the turning point - hence the obsession with it and the relentless pushing and coercion...

[Sue (Ayt)]

Sheeple1: "Hm, so it is only approved now? Why did I take it then?"
Sheeple2: "Nah. Nevermind. Just do what the authorities tell you. They know what's best. (proud) I'll get my third shot in a week from now."
Sheeple1: "Yeah, haha, you're right. (smirks) Too much thinking about stuff like this makes my brain hurt anyway."
Sheeple2: "I am so proud of my collection now. What good is a vax passport if you don't fill it in, hehe?"
Sheeple2: "Yeah, haha, right. I want my third shot, too. So cool."
:facepalm:

lol - yes - And little stickers or gold stars could even be added to the passport bi-annually!
What FUN to collect all the stickers and maybe even get an award?
:star::star::star:

[jaybee]

Biden just gave a live speech about it:
gOfuOeSnv-8
(starts at approx. 57:00)
Listen and Weep
:facepalm:
**edit to add that I am enjoying watching the down-votes tally up.


I signed in just to give it a dislike ....

The tally is now 205 likes 1.6 k dislikes... (I expect youtube will cap the dislikes somehow)

anyway....

"What did you think about Biden's speech Flash..?"

ytcN6DpW-bU


Flash the baby sloth yawning


:)

[Matthew]

Article by the BMJ, cut and pasted in full. The article is better viewed via the BMJ link though imo; it will be updated if corrected, and there are hyperlinks I haven't copied

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/08/23/does-the-fda-think-these-data-justify-the-first-full-approval-of-a-covid-19-vaccine/


../'~---=#^##===------¬


Does the FDA think these data justify the first full approval of a covid-19 vaccine?
August 23, 2021

The FDA should demand adequate, controlled studies with long term follow up, and make data publicly available, before granting full approval to covid-19 vaccines, says Peter Doshi

On 28 July 2021, Pfizer and BioNTech posted updated results for their ongoing phase 3 covid-19 vaccine trial. The preprint came almost a year to the day after the historical trial commenced, and nearly four months since the companies announced vaccine efficacy estimates “up to six months.”

But you won’t find 10 month follow-up data here. While the preprint is new, the results it contains aren’t particularly up to date. In fact, the paper is based on the same data cut-off date (13 March 2021) as the 1 April press release, and its topline efficacy result is identical: 91.3% (95% CI 89.0 to 93.2) vaccine efficacy against symptomatic covid-19 through “up to six months of follow-up.”

The 20 page preprint matters because it represents the most detailed public account of the pivotal trial data Pfizer submitted in pursuit of the world’s first “full approval” of a coronavirus vaccine from the Food and Drug Administration. It deserves careful scrutiny.

The elephant named “waning immunity”

Since late last year, we’ve heard that Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines are “95% effective” with even greater efficacy against severe disease (“100% effective,” Moderna said).

Whatever one thinks about the “95% effective” claims (my thoughts are here), even the most enthusiastic commentators have acknowledged that measuring vaccine efficacy two months after dosing says little about just how long vaccine-induced immunity will last. “We’re going to be looking very intently at the durability of protection,” Pfizer senior vice president William Gruber, an author on the recent preprint, told the FDA’s advisory committee last December.

The concern, of course, was decreased efficacy over time. “Waning immunity” is a known problem for influenza vaccines, with some studies showing near zero effectiveness after just three months, meaning a vaccine taken early may ultimately provide no protection by the time “flu season” arrives some months later. If vaccine efficacy wanes over time, the crucial question becomes what level of effectiveness will the vaccine provide when a person is actually exposed to the virus? Unlike covid vaccines, influenza vaccine performance has always been judged over a full season, not a couple months.

And so the recent reports from Israel’s Ministry of Health caught my eye. In early July, they reported that efficacy against infection and symptomatic disease “fell to 64%.” By late July it had fallen to 39% where Delta is the dominant strain. This is very low. For context, the FDA’s expectation is of “at least 50%” efficacy for any approvable vaccine.

Now Israel, which almost exclusively used Pfizer vaccine, has begun administering a third “booster” dose to all adults over 40. And starting 20 September 2021, the US plans to follow suit for all “fully vaccinated” adults eight months past their second dose.

Delta may not be responsible

Enter Pfizer’s preprint. As an RCT reporting “up to six months of follow-up,” it is notable that evidence of waning immunity was already visible in the data by the 13 March 2021 data cut-off.

“From its peak post-dose 2,” the study authors write, “observed VE [vaccine efficacy] declined.” From 96% to 90% (from two months to <4 months), then to 84% (95% CI 75 to 90) “from four months to the data cut-off,” which, by my calculation (see footnote at the end of the piece), was about one month later.

But although this additional information was available to Pfizer in April, it was not published until the end of July.

And it’s hard to imagine how the Delta variant could play a real role here, for 77% of trial participants were from the United States, where Delta was not established until months after data cut-off.

Waning efficacy has the potential to be far more than a minor inconvenience; it can dramatically change the risk-benefit calculus. And whatever its cause—intrinsic properties of the vaccine, the circulation of new variants, some combination of the two, or something else—the bottom line is that vaccines need to be effective.

Until new clinical trials demonstrate that boosters increase efficacy above 50%, without increasing serious adverse events, it is unclear whether the 2-dose series would even meet the FDA’s approval standard at six or nine months.

The “six month” preprint based on the 7% of trial participants who remained blinded at six months

The final efficacy timepoint reported in Pfizer’s preprint is “from four months to the data cut-off.” The confidence interval here is wider than earlier time points because only half of trial participants (53%) made it to the four month mark, and mean follow-up is around 4.4 months (see footnote).

This all happened because starting last December, Pfizer allowed all trial participants to be formally unblinded, and placebo recipients to get vaccinated. By 13 March 2021 (data cut-off), 93% of trial participants (41,128 of 44,060; Fig 1) were unblinded, officially entering “open-label followup.” (Ditto for Moderna: by mid April, 98% of placebo recipients had been vaccinated.)

Despite the reference to “six month safety and efficacy” in the preprint’s title, the paper only reports on vaccine efficacy “up to six months,” but not from six months. This is not semantics, as it turns out only 7% of trial participants actually reached six months of blinded follow-up (“8% of BNT162b2 recipients and 6% of placebo recipients had ≥6 months follow-up post-dose 2.”) So despite this preprint appearing a year after the trial began, it provides no data on vaccine efficacy past six months, which is the period Israel says vaccine efficacy has dropped to 39%.

It is hard to imagine that the <10% of trial participants who remained blinded at six months (which presumably further dwindled after 13 March 2021) could constitute a reliable or valid sample to produce further findings. And the preprint does not report any demographic comparisons to justify future analyses.

Severe disease

With the US awash in news about rising cases of the Delta variant, including among the “fully vaccinated,” the vaccine’s efficacy profile is in question. But some medical commentators are delivering an upbeat message. Former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb, who is on Pfizer’s board, said: “Remember, the original premise behind these vaccines were [sic] that they would substantially reduce the risk of death and severe disease and hospitalization. And that was the data that came out of the initial clinical trials.”

Yet, the trials were not designed to study severe disease. In the data that supported Pfizer’s EUA, the company itself characterized the “severe covid-19” endpoint results as “preliminary evidence.” Hospital admission numbers were not reported, and zero covid-19 deaths occurred.

In the preprint, high efficacy against “severe covid-19” is reported based on all follow-up time (one event in the vaccinated group vs 30 in placebo), but the number of hospital admissions is not reported so we don’t know which, if any, of these patients were ill enough to require hospital treatment. (In Moderna’s trial, data last year showed that 21 of 30 “severe covid-19” cases were not admitted to hospital; Table S14).

And on preventing death from covid-19, there are too few data to draw conclusions—a total of three covid-19 related deaths (one on vaccine, two on placebo). There were 29 total deaths during blinded follow-up (15 in the vaccine arm; 14 in placebo).

The crucial question, however, is whether the waning efficacy seen in the primary endpoint data also applies to the vaccine’s efficacy against severe disease. Unfortunately, Pfizer’s new preprint does not report the results in a way that allows for evaluating this question.

Approval imminent without data transparency, or even an advisory committee meeting?

Last December, with limited data, the FDA granted Pfizer’s vaccine an EUA, enabling access to all Americans who wanted one. It sent a clear message that the FDA could both address the enormous demand for vaccines without compromising on the science. A “full approval” could remain a high bar.

But here we are, with FDA reportedly on the verge of granting a marketing license 13 months into the still ongoing, two year pivotal trial, with no reported data past 13 March 2021, unclear efficacy after six months due to unblinding, evidence of waning protection irrespective of the Delta variant, and limited reporting of safety data. (The preprint reports “decreased appetite, lethargy, asthenia, malaise, night sweats, and hyperhidrosis were new adverse events attributable to BNT162b2 not previously identified in earlier reports,” but provides no data tables showing the frequency of these, or other, adverse events.)

It’s not helping matters that FDA now says it won’t convene its advisory committee to discuss the data ahead of approving Pfizer’s vaccine. (Last August, to address vaccine hesitancy, the agency had “committed to use an advisory committee composed of independent experts to ensure deliberations about authorization or licensure are transparent for the public.”)

Prior to the preprint, my view, along with a group of around 30 clinicians, scientists, and patient advocates, was that there were simply too many open questions about all covid-19 vaccines to support approving any this year. The preprint has, unfortunately, addressed very few of those open questions, and has raised some new ones.

I reiterate our call: “slow down and get the science right—there is no legitimate reason to hurry to grant a license to a coronavirus vaccine.”

FDA should be demanding that the companies complete the two year follow-up, as originally planned (even without a placebo group, much can still be learned about safety). They should demand adequate, controlled studies using patient outcomes in the now substantial population of people who have recovered from covid. And regulators should bolster public trust by helping ensure that everyone can access the underlying data.

Peter Doshi, senior editor, The BMJ.

[Delight]

1429796383616286722

This has commentary about the covid passport implications. The covid vaccine passport will be a financial instrument.

Mandate Madness: FDA Approval Of Pfizer Emboldens Needle Nazis (https://www.trunews.com/live)

[Delight]

OK, if we have FAITH that because we are connected to a Power Greater than Ourselves that is omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, we can TRUST that when we act in a way that supports the Creation and its LOVE of Life, we will be SUPPORTED.

It is time to boycott, to leave jobs, to literally walk out in Faith. This is not about "church" but the esential relationship that we choose to that POWER. Paradoxically, our FAITH and walking out will challenge the system's plans. Overcome your reluctance to CHOOSE to love yourself and your children.

1429814297480376320

[mojo]

After listen to Darth Videns propaganda message, Im truly concerned that very soon people that are not vaxed will not be allowed access to food & other necessities, myself included. Also that people in the military will be forced to jab and people are being threatened that they will loose their jobs. Would it surprise anyone to find out that Biden Admin asked the FDA to expedite the Covid vax approval? Now look at how Biden is using the approval to instill fear and to shame the unvaxed


Let me say this loud and clear: If you are one of the millions of Americans who have said that you will get the shot when it had full FDA approval — that has now happened. The moment you have been waiting for is here — and the time to get vaccinated is today. —

[Matthew]

Gymstrodamus or Brostrodamus. Turns out he's called Chris Sky. I doubt he's using the occult like I understand Nostradamus did(?) but with his prediction last year coming true (so far) he knows his stuff. I guess it gives him a different set of assumptions and can reason forward with it.

Anyway, this isn't just one of his predictions, it's also some pertinent information about how corruption may have happened at the FDA.



Tweet summary

- This is only from Chris Sky!

- They're going to push mandatory vaccinations because FDA approval is "proof it's safe and effective"

"Well guess how they did it?:
They got Janet Woodcock, chief of the centre of drug evaluation research, and they put her as the acting head of the FDA to give her the approval status, and this woman is personally responsible for approving both
- OxyContin
- Fentanyl
The two most dangerous drugs on the market today, that got approved by [Janet Woodcock] who's now going to be approving our covid vaccines so they can push everyone with mandates"

https://twitter.com/chrissaccoccia1/status/1429589640676139010

[Eric J (Viking)]

FDA Commits Massive Criminal Fraud By Giving Full Approval to Injurious Covid Vaccines PRIOR TO COMPLETING the Required and Statutory Authorization Process—WHY?!

To Thwart the Coming Avalanche of
Valid Lawsuits Being Filed Against Governments, Corporations, Colleges
& Universities, NGOs and Other
Organizations Across the USA That Unlawfully Required Proof of Covid Vaccinations to Enter — When They
Were Authorized for Emergency Use
Only — THAT’S WHY!

This Patently Illegitimate FDA Approval Also
Provides a False Justification to Make These
Sometimes Fatal Vaccines Mandatory.

What else can be said but that every major governmental organ of the U.S. Public Health apparatus has conspired to aggressively promote and/or mandate the administration of extremely harmful, and often lethal, Covid injections to the American people.

None dare call it a meticulously planned and highly organized GENOCIDE via vaccine-delivered bioweaponry; nevertheless, that’s exactly what it is.

State of the Nation
August 23, 2021

Recommended Reading

UNPRECEDENTED! FDA Illicitly Subverts Own Vax Approval Process

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=80086

Viking

[Delight]

OMG

1429876193948483593

The beauty of "healthy normal" will be shunned. Common sense will be lunacy, cruelty will be kindness!

I thought THIS movie was fiction? NOT.

y6u11DbZHrY

[mojo]

Dr. Gina Loudon "This is not really an FDA approved drug"

Gina states, Article by Richard Harris NPR FEB 19 "They lost the Covid Control group by Phizer." They never finished the Covid study because there was no longer a control group but FDA approved the jab anyway.


Doctors Being Punished For Prescribing Effective Therapeutics For Covid
https://rumble.com/vlkroy-doctors-being-punished-for-prescribing-effective-therapeutics-for-covid.html

viyljo

[mojo]

Is there something wrong with these supposed complete list of ingredients?... Where is the graphene? Where is the Luciferase? Where is the partial aborted fetal products? Am I wrong about this?


Many people are curious to know what the ingredients are for the three currently available COVID-19 vaccines in the US.
Here is a breakdown of the three COVID vaccines and their ingredients:

Pfizer Vaccine: The full list of ingredients for the Pfizer vaccine is:
mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2
[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-
phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium
phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose.
The Pfizer vaccine does not contain eggs, preservatives, or latex.
Moderna Vaccine: The full list of ingredients for the Moderna vaccine is:
Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000
dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]),
tromethamine,tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate trihydrate, and sucrose.
The Moderna vaccine does not contain eggs, preservatives, or latex.
Johnson & Johnson Vaccine: The full list of ingredients for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is:
Recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein,
citric acid monohydrate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, ethanol, 2 hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD),
polysorbate-80, sodium chloride.
The Johnson & Johnson vaccine does not contain eggs, preservatives, or latex.
More Information can be found on the CDC website.

https://portal.ct.gov/Coronavirus/Covid-19-Knowledge-Base/Vaccine-Ingredients

[mojo]

FDA Approval ILLEGAL! Doctor Reveals Pfizer Insert Proves Criminal Regulation Violations!

BIG NEWS!!! According to the Doctor 50 percent of the people that took a vaccine received a PLACEBO!!!!
Hi Bill, Some info about ingredients but still criminal because of adverse reactions & warnings not listed according to Doctor Jane Ruby. Of all the deep digging I did today to help in getting a better understanding this video is a must watch. Please share far & wide.


The package insert reveals "criminal action", according to Dr. Jane Ruby, who joins Stew Peters to discuss the unprecedented action taken by the FDA.
https://rumble.com/vll4b9-fda-approval-illegal-doctor-reveals-pfizer-insert-proves-criminal-regulatio.html

viyy5z

[onawah]

FDA Grants Full Approval of Pfizer Vaccine, Critics Blast Agency for Lack of Data, Scientific Debate
8/23/21
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-full-approval-pfizer-vaccine-lack-scientific-debate/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=2a8cae2f-18f9-48b2-ab50-39686590e40e
By Megan Redshaw

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

"Critics said it was concerning that full approval was based on only six months’ worth of data — despite clinical trials designed for two years — and that there was no public discussion of the data.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine for people 16 years and older — without allowing public discussion or holding a formal advisory committee meeting to discuss data.

This is the first COVID vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates by employers and universities.

“For businesses and universities that have been thinking about putting vaccine requirements in place in order to create safer spaces for people to work and learn, I think this move from the FDA, when it comes, will actually help them to move forward with those kinds of plans,” U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy on Sunday told CNN’s Brianna Keilar.

“The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting FDA commissioner in a press release issued Monday.

“While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product.”

Woodcock said she believes FDA approval will instill additional confidence in people to get vaccinated.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine for people 16 years and older — without allowing public discussion or holding a formal advisory committee meeting to discuss data.

This is the first COVID vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates by employers and universities.

“For businesses and universities that have been thinking about putting vaccine requirements in place in order to create safer spaces for people to work and learn, I think this move from the FDA, when it comes, will actually help them to move forward with those kinds of plans,” U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy on Sunday told CNN’s Brianna Keilar.

“The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting FDA commissioner in a press release issued Monday.

“While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product.”

Woodcock said she believes FDA approval will instill additional confidence in people to get vaccinated.Critics accuse FDA of ‘unprecedented, naked power grab’

According to an article published Aug. 20 in the BMJ, transparency advocates have criticized the FDA decision not to hold a formal advisory committee meeting to discuss Pfizer’s application for full approval — an important mechanism used to scrutinize data.

Last year the FDA said it was “committed to use an advisory committee composed of independent experts to ensure deliberations about authorisation or licensure are transparent for the public.”

But in a statement to The BMJ, the FDA said it did not believe a meeting was necessary ahead of the expected full FDA approval.

An FDA spokesperson said the agency held numerous meetings of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) related to COVID vaccines in 2020, and did not believe a meeting was needed related to this biologics license application for Pfizer.

According to the BMJ, companies typically apply for full approval after a longer period has elapsed so that more data are available for review.

Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinizing the data.

“These public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorization,” said Witczak. Wticzak was one of 27 experts who launched a citizen’s petition demanding the FDA “slow down and get the science right” before approving COVID vaccines.

“The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing,” Wticzak said. “These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled and data scrutinised in advance of an approval.”

Witczak said it’s concerning that full approval is based on only six months’ worth of data — despite clinical trials designed for two years — and there’s no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed.

“They know they can’t win this argument on the science and that’s why they had to abolish the public process and independent oversight,” said Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “They believe themselves so powerful now that they are stripping off all pretenses that this is about public health, and are baldly revealing the corruption.”

Kennedy told The Defender:

“This is a sinister scheme for mandating a badly flawed vaccine that has already made history with record deaths and injuries, that neither prevents disease nor transmission, and does not improve mortality. Pfizer’s most recent six-month data show that while the jab prevents some COVID deaths, it causes more heart attacks yielding a net loss of life.”

Diana Zuckerman, president of the National Center for Health Research, told The BMJ it’s obvious the FDA has no intention of hearing anyone else’s opinion, and says making decisions behind closed doors can feed vaccine hesitancy.

“It’s important to have a public discussion about what kind of data are there, and what the limitations are,” Zuckerman said. “As we think about risk versus benefit, we need to know.”Joshua Sharfstein, vice dean for public health practice and community engagement at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and former FDA deputy commissioner during the Obama administration, said advisory committee meetings are more than just a way of receiving scientific input from outside experts.

“It’s also an opportunity to educate the public about the important work that the FDA has done reviewing an enormous amount of data about a product,” Sharfstein told The BMJ. “It’s a chance for questions to be asked and answered, building public confidence.”

[Satori]

FDA approval is meaningless when it comes to the “covid 19” disease fraud, and otherwise.

Criminals intent upon committing their crimes, especially when necessary to save their own sorry, miserable, lying asses will say and do anything. The first tenet of government and corporations, corporatism, is to lie. The bigger the lie and the more oft repeated the better. Then, destroy the evidence. Always. And, never miss the chance to accuse your enemies of that which you are guilty.

If you ever wondered what you would do when confronted by a cold-blooded psychopathic tyrant ( or pack of them), you are now beyond any reasonable doubt put in that position and faced with a decision(s) that will make the difference between life and death, and at a minimum, the difference in the quality of your health, and in turn, the length of your life on this plane of existence.

Act wisely based upon your values and your sense of wisdom. Trust in yourself.

I know where I stand on this and I will act accordingly.

[indiana]

Another sad day for our institutions. Myself and others have lost trust in them. I'm not sure what the real statistics would show us about the harmful effects of the vax, but I do know the insert on the Covid vax does not list ingredients. How will FDA approve the shot without this knowledge?



The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Monday granted full approval to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for individuals 16 years and older.

"The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic," Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock said in a statement issued Monday. "While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product."


That woman... Janet Woodcock... is either living in cloud cuckoo land or she is a shameless (and dangerous) liar...

But we should expect no less now as people in key positions of authority around the world throw us to the wolves and literally don't give a damn about having any personal integrity or speaking the truth about anything -

Just mind boggling how treacherous they are... :facepalm:

I believe she was in charge of this debacle too.... "the history with OxyContin- FDA denied it was addictive for 10 years so Oxy was over deployed for minor pain relief- causing enormous tragedy- we very well may be seeing history repeat itself with an over deployed vaccine."

[Eric J (Viking)]

RMN

Pfizer Jab Receives Full Approval From FDA, Pentagon Mandates Jabs For All Troops
https://youtu.be/CyHC-msmki8

The Pentagon's press secretary has just confirmed that - as expected - the DoD will now require all troops across the armed services to get the jab.
Where you at Patriots?

Comments:
This is a sad day in history. Things are gonna escalate a lot now. Now the hard choices begin. May God strengthen you.

If the military stand together with the people we can stop those tyrants.

How can it receive "full approval" when the safety studies are not completed until 2023
Because they are all in on this evil satanic agenda

There already IS enough data to negate approving this drug! From myocardial, to blood clots, to healthy people dying shortly after the jab, to microscope proof of severe damage to red blood cells, and nanotechnology clumping together. This is purely political from the corrupt CDC.

Hang in there Patriots. Mandates are not laws. Do not be deceived. You have a choice .

Only choice is to leave the military

Lol no u don’t we have to stand up now or we are going to loose our freedom

Once you sign your name on those papers, you BELONG to the gov. I speak from experience

we do not know the long term effects of injecting billions of toxic spike proteins in a human body. BTW. The purpose of the vax is to get your body to produce antibodies. If you are tested and have antibodies. What is the jab for anyway.

My comment: The powers that be in the medical field, news media and the liberals are all deluded into thinking the vax is helping. They are deceived, they are not part of the conspiracy to sicken and weaken America and take part in the depopulation agenda. They genuinely think the vax is safe. They are deadly wrong in that assumption. Those that get two shots of the vax are at a greater risk of a host of terrible side effects and death within 3 years. That is the bottom line.

It is very likely that 1 million people world wide have already died from the vax. You add that to the 4 million that died from the pandemic and we are already looking at 5 million dead, and this pandemic is just starting to take off. The next blame will be placed on the Covid variants, when they have no proof of them at all. They will blame the unvaccinated for those new variant infections, deaths and illnesses. They will continue the lie and embellish it, to keep covering up the truth.

The people are so trusting and naïve they will continue to believe the lies from the officials. It is hard to say how many millions will have to die world wide before the people wake up to what is really going on.
But one thing is certain, as people drop dead and a functioning society starts to grind to a halt because of the lack of trained workers, etc. - THEN the people will start to see the reality of what has happened.

Dead pilots can't fly planes. Dead truck drivers can't deliver food. Dead train engineers can't run trains. Dead factory workers can't continue their skilled work. We're already seeing this, but the main stream media is not reporting it, and the politicians won't dare mention it. The employment statistics show a mysterious lack of trained workers right now to fill the jobs available, and no one is asking why. The truth is, hundreds of thousands have died in America FROM the vax. The nation is already grinding to a halt, and this is just the beginning. GE

Viking

[Eric J (Viking)]

SOTN

FDA Commits Massive Criminal Fraud By Giving Full Approval to Injurious Covid Vaccines — PRIOR TO COMPLETING — the Required and Statutory Authorization Process—So why did they really do it?!

Posted on August 23, 2021


To Thwart the Coming Avalanche of
Valid Lawsuits Being Filed Against Governments, Corporations, Colleges
and Universities, Healthcare and
Scientific Research Institutions,
NGOs and Other Organizations Across
the USA That Unlawfully Required
Proof of Covid Vaccinations to Enter
When The Vaccines Were Authorized
for Emergency Use Only — THAT’S WHY!


Even More Significantly, This Patently Illegitimate
FDA Approval Provides a False Justification to
Make These Frequently Fatal Vaccines Mandatory.
Covid Vaccinations Can Never Be Made Compulsory
Since They Represent Both an Invasion of Personal
Sovereignty and Assault Against the Human Body.

What else can be said but that every major governmental organ of the U.S. Public Health apparatus has conspired to aggressively promote and/or mandate the administration of extremely harmful, and often lethal, Covid injections to the American people.

None dare call it a meticulously planned and highly organized GENOCIDE via vaccine-delivered bioweaponry; nevertheless, that’s exactly what it is.

State of the Nation
August 23, 2021

Viking

[Ankle Biter]

Sheeple1: "Hm, so it is only approved now? Why did I take it then?"
Sheeple2: "Nah. Nevermind. Just do what the authorities tell you. They know what's best. (proud) I'll get my third shot in a week from now."
Sheeple1: "Yeah, haha, you're right. (smirks) Too much thinking about stuff like this makes my brain hurt anyway."
Sheeple2: "I am so proud of my collection now. What good is a vax passport if you don't fill it in, hehe?"
Sheeple2: "Yeah, haha, right. I want my third shot, too. So cool."
:facepalm:

lol - yes - And little stickers or gold stars could even be added to the passport bi-annually!
What FUN to collect all the stickers and maybe even get an award?
:star::star::star:

The not so coveted Darwin award maybe.

We need a miracle at this point and that's what I'm praying for.

[Bill Ryan]

Clif High takes the FDA to task, explaining just who they are and what they do.

He's as clear as ever, but slightly more animated and energetic than usual — maybe unsurprisingly.

dD5Ulv52dvtt

[yelik]

COVID Vaccine News with ideas about protecting yourself

RFK Jr and 2 world-leading doctors send the world a horrifying warning

https://vsecretscc.com/sneak-peek-2

[Gwin Ru]

...

... from Jim Stone:
A few pointers on the clotshot that just got "approved" (http://82.221.129.208/.uf3.html)

The actual shot people know of as the "pfizer shot" never got approved. It stayed as "experimental". However, a second jab under a different name "Comirnaty" DID get "approved".

Here's the kicker: Under emergency authorization the same old clotshot can be administered without approval until enough "Comirnaty" gets produced, apparently they have practically none, and they have millions of vials of the shot we all know and have come to love ready to go that can be completely used up before the "approved" version, (which is probably an identical weapon) HAS TO be used, with the previous one "discontinued".

And as everyone knows, they threw procedure out the window and even Comirnaty has until Halloween 2025 to complete it's safety studies, all the while it will be administered without them.

When I originally went over the approval document, it was a lengthy convoluted confusing snake speak script ALL THE WAY THROUGH. With an extended decipher done later, the above is precisely what it really says, in reality the "Pfizer shot" did NOT get approved but re-authorized for use until the tens of millions of shots already made are used, and then they'll switch to the "approved" Comirnaty version which has basically no clinical trials done on it, and are instead PENDING 2025.

So that's great. That's all the time they need to get'er done.

[Matthew]

...

... from Jim Stone:
A few pointers on the clotshot that just got "approved" (http://82.221.129.208/.uf3.html)

The actual shot people know of as the "pfizer shot" never got approved. It stayed as "experimental". However, a second jab under a different name "Comirnaty" DID get "approved".

Here's the kicker: Under emergency authorization the same old clotshot can be administered without approval until enough "Comirnaty" gets produced, apparently they have practically none, and they have millions of vials of the shot we all know and have come to love ready to go that can be completely used up before the "approved" version, (which is probably an identical weapon) HAS TO be used, with the previous one "discontinued".

And as everyone knows, they threw procedure out the window and even Comirnaty has until Halloween 2025 to complete it's safety studies, all the while it will be administered without them.

When I originally went over the approval document, it was a lengthy convoluted confusing snake speak script ALL THE WAY THROUGH. With an extended decipher done later, the above is precisely what it really says, in reality the "Pfizer shot" did NOT get approved but re-authorized for use until the tens of millions of shots already made are used, and then they'll switch to the "approved" Comirnaty version which has basically no clinical trials done on it, and are instead PENDING 2025.

So that's great. That's all the time they need to get'er done.


Dr Robert Malone was talking about exactly this in the video below

https://twitter.com/TanyaRo58329998/status/1430212200065556485

[Delight]

...

... from Jim Stone:
A few pointers on the clotshot that just got "approved" (http://82.221.129.208/.uf3.html)

The actual shot people know of as the "pfizer shot" never got approved. It stayed as "experimental". However, a second jab under a different name "Comirnaty" DID get "approved".

Here's the kicker: Under emergency authorization the same old clotshot can be administered without approval until enough "Comirnaty" gets produced, apparently they have practically none, and they have millions of vials of the shot we all know and have come to love ready to go that can be completely used up before the "approved" version, (which is probably an identical weapon) HAS TO be used, with the previous one "discontinued".

And as everyone knows, they threw procedure out the window and even Comirnaty has until Halloween 2025 to complete it's safety studies, all the while it will be administered without them.

When I originally went over the approval document, it was a lengthy convoluted confusing snake speak script ALL THE WAY THROUGH. With an extended decipher done later, the above is precisely what it really says, in reality the "Pfizer shot" did NOT get approved but re-authorized for use until the tens of millions of shots already made are used, and then they'll switch to the "approved" Comirnaty version which has basically no clinical trials done on it, and are instead PENDING 2025.

So that's great. That's all the time they need to get'er done.


Dr Robert Malone was talking about exactly this in the video below

https://twitter.com/TanyaRo58329998/status/1430212200065556485

Here are longer segments on rumble.

vj068s[COLOR="red"][COLOR="red"]

[Delight]

The approved jab has not even been produced????

vj06z6

[Merkaba360]

Is there something wrong with these supposed complete list of ingredients?... Where is the graphene? Where is the Luciferase? Where is the partial aborted fetal products? Am I wrong about this?


Many people are curious to know what the ingredients are for the three currently available COVID-19 vaccines in the US.
Here is a breakdown of the three COVID vaccines and their ingredients:

Pfizer Vaccine: The full list of ingredients for the Pfizer vaccine is:
mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2
[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-
phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium
phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose.
The Pfizer vaccine does not contain eggs, preservatives, or latex.
Moderna Vaccine: The full list of ingredients for the Moderna vaccine is:
Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000
dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]),
tromethamine,tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate trihydrate, and sucrose.
The Moderna vaccine does not contain eggs, preservatives, or latex.
Johnson & Johnson Vaccine: The full list of ingredients for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is:
Recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein,
citric acid monohydrate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, ethanol, 2 hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD),
polysorbate-80, sodium chloride.
The Johnson & Johnson vaccine does not contain eggs, preservatives, or latex.
More Information can be found on the CDC website.

https://portal.ct.gov/Coronavirus/Covid-19-Knowledge-Base/Vaccine-Ingredients

I saw that and wondered the same. Is it possible that is the Active concoction. But some of the unlisted toxic chemicals are for preservation, aduvants, and other excuses to add insane ingredients. Maybe its ugly, so they don't list them. I mean we are so deep into wonderland now, they might just not even care and do whatever they want whether illegal or not. Especially if they can get to the part where billions are sterile, diseased or dead before we can figure these things out and do something about it.

Or they had to remove all those horrible chemicals, cuz in combination with this new tech, everybody drops dead at the Drs. office .

The diobolical mRNA tech may be enough for what they are planning. Might not need all the other fun along with this ride.

[Bill Ryan]

The approved jab has not even been produced????

vj06z6:bump:

This seems extremely important to understand.

[Estherilla]

ok, we still have CDS ...we can buy it free anywhere as chlorine it is a way of make water safe. :)

[mojo]

I saw that and wondered the same. Is it possible that is the Active concoction. But some of the unlisted toxic chemicals are for preservation, aduvants, and other excuses to add insane ingredients. Maybe its ugly, so they don't list them. I mean we are so deep into wonderland now, they might just not even care and do whatever they want whether illegal or not. Especially if they can get to the part where billions are sterile, diseased or dead before we can figure these things out and do something about it.

Or they had to remove all those horrible chemicals, cuz in combination with this new tech, everybody drops dead at the Drs. office .

The diabolical mRNA tech may be enough for what they are planning. Might not need all the other fun along with this ride.

Thank you Merkaba360 for following up on this. It is important to determine exactly the ingredients. Has anyone heard of a reliable scientist or doctor that tested what is in the Covid vaccine? This needs to be put to rest once & for all.

[thepainterdoug]

And yet La quinta labs have confirmed that Graphene Oxide occupies the majority of the material. Up to 90%

SO whats wrong here?

[muxfolder]

They're really, really, really desperate to vaccine everyone. So if that's not fishy, then what is?

[Satori]

L””
The approved jab has not even been produced????

vj06z6

Yes it is important to understand.

I just read the FDA letters to Pfizer and BioNTech, essentially the same company for purposes of these “vaccines”, and I also read a 5 or so page bullet point summary of these letters and related issues prepared by Dr. Malone and at least one other qualified person.

On the issue of what was approved and what a person would allow to be put into his or her body if he or she decided to get the mRNA jab because it has been “approved”, here’s the point Malone is making: if you got this jab today and for the next 6 to 9 months, or more, you would not be getting what the FDA approved. You would not get COMIRNATY. (Which is the same recipe as the EUA stuff.). You would be getting the existing EUA Pfizer jab crap that has been on the market for all this time.

To allow Pfizer to continue its windfall on the EUA poison, the FDA approved extending its use and shelf life for 6 to 9 months, and probably longer. Thus, if you get this jab, you are getting the EUA stuff, not the so-called approved COMIRNATY. (Which is supposed to be available by the end of 2021 or in 2022.). But they want you to think you are getting the approved stuff.

And this is only one of the serious problems with this mRNA jab, along with the continued absence of proof of safety, efficacy and necessity.

Another problem is the FDA is allowing 12 to 15 year old children to be given the EUA poison, while trying to give the impression that somehow there is a difference between the two jabs, when there is not, and one is no better than the other. They are both equally toxic and a threat to health and safety.

[Delight]

Cross posting with a breaking bit of news concerning 12,000 adverse reactions within 28days (and no pre-existing diagnosis) in ONE STATE at 23:26

1XILh4AHlqY


COVID CON Solution Series: Your Boss Doesn't Own Your Body

Join esteemed panelists Pam Popper Founder of MakeAmericansFreeAgain.com, Lisa Parker Independent Union Labor Consultant, Lead Attorney Tom Renz and Host Reinette Senum as they show you how to decline getting the COVID shot without losing your job.

Your company doesn't own your body and therefore can't tell you what to do without your informed consent. Learn what your boss may not want you to know.

1XILh4AHlqY

[Arcturian108]

The sleight of hand in more detail between the two jab cocktails:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/550b0ac4e4b0c16cdea1b084/t/6124fdd27da16f3e2c51aecb/1629814226387/Key+points+to+consider+FDA+letters+and+press+release.pdf

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/550b0ac4e4b0c16cdea1b084/t/6124fdd27da16f3e2c51aecb/1629814226387/Key+points+to+consider+FDA+letters+and+press+release.pdf

[Bill Ryan]

The approved jab has not even been produced????

vj06z6:bump:

This seems extremely important to understand.Mike Adams has caught on to the trick the FDA pulled:

https://naturalnews.com/2021-08-24-fda-approval-future-covid-vaccine-biontech.html

GASLIGHTING AMERICA: Did the FDA actually approve a FUTURE covid “vaccine” from BioNTech that does not exist yet?

There appears to be a whole lot of confusion out there about which “vaccine” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was actually “approved” by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Aug. 23, 2021.

While many mainstream media outlets quickly ran with the story that Pfizer’s existing mRNA injection for the Fauci Flu was given the official green light from the FDA, supposedly making it easier to mandate, others are saying (https://leohohmann.com/2021/08/25/fda-playing-bait-and-switch-with-americans-tricking-them-into-believing-shots-currently-being-offered-have-been-granted-full-approval-when-they-have-not/) that the FDA issued approval specifically to BioNTech, a German vaccine corporation, for a Chinese Virus injection that does not exist yet.

BioNTech, as you may recall, partnered with Pfizer to produce the current Fauci Flu shot that is being administered under an emergency use authorization (EUA). It turns out, however, that this is technically a different shot than the “Comirnaty” branded one referenced in the FDA’s recent approval announcement.

It would seem as though there is a mass mind control con taking place right now in which the usual suspects are peddling a confusing, if not false, narrative that the current Pfizer injection has received “full approval” from the FDA. So, what is the actual truth?

According to Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of messenger RNA technology, the official FDA documents do not indicate (https://twitter.com/TanyaRo58329998/status/1430212200065556485), based on his own reading, that full approval for the Pfizer injection currently in use has arrived. That, he says, is coming around 2023 – be sure to watch the multi-part interview below to learn more:

https://twitter.com/TanyaRo58329998/status/1430212200065556485

1430212200065556485
So are the Pfizer jabs really “approved,” or are they not?

In case you are unfamiliar with Dr. Malone, he recently blew the lid (https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-22-inventor-mrna-fears-assassination-blowing-lid-plandemic.html) on the dangers of administering mRNA injections in the middle of a pandemic, fearing that he might be assassinated for coming forward with this information at a time when the government and media are aggressively pushing the shots as the final solution.

Now, Dr. Malone is taking issue with the government and media’s latest claim that the Pfizer shot has been fully approved by the FDA when that may not actually be the case based on the wording of the approval.

On the flip side, Pfizer’s own labeling (https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471) suggests that its current jab authorized under EUA is the same as Comirnaty, and that the two are basically interchangeable.

“The FDA-approved COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and the EUA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series,” the Pfizer document states.

At this point, it is uncertain exactly what is going on, but we wanted to bring this conflicting information to your attention. By all appearances, it would seem as though the medical fascists are trying yet again to pull a fast one on the masses in order to justify “mandatory” vaccination schemes designed to enslave the world under Big Pharma rule.

An FDA release (https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine) on August 23 further suggests that the agency considers Comirnaty and the current Pfizer injection being administered to be one and the same, and that the name is merely changing because the drug has received full approval.

“The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older,” the agency says, seemingly supporting what the media is claiming about the approval.

“The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.”

[mountain_jim]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/083/068/174/original/6da49830cb0da6eb.png

[mojo]

Something else that slipped by most people but imo extremely important, was what Dr Jane Ruby said in one of the videos posted here...

50 percent of all the people that have taken the Covid shot may have received a PLACEBO.

The Gov is keeping track of those people that got the placebo but individuals do not know if they received the actual Covid shot or the placebo. The Government is not telling the people anything but this would explain why people that thought they got the real Covid shot still ended up getting COVID virus. This is insane... Why hasn't the Gov told people that the reason they got Covid is because they first got a placebo.

[avid]

I flagged that weeks ago, as if all who got a certain batch were compromised, it would be traceable, so random saline would be introduced.
Praying some of my friends/family only got one shot, as they were saying absolutely no side effects on first dose, but stiff arms second. Now praying the daft folk won’t get any ‘top-ups’…
Here am I on my own, keeping head below the parapet, and if I get the flu so be it, but am trying my best to help and support my family with major D3, etc, can only hope…

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114329-What-to-do-if-you-have-had-the-experimental-jab&p=1445763&viewfull=1#post1445763

[Bill Ryan]

Chris Martenson had this video deleted from YouTube last night US time — the first time on his channel. Here it is on Odyssey:

Vaccine Mandates Are Here

https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2/vaccine-mandates-are-here

Also here as an MP3:

https://cm-us-standard.s3.amazonaws.com/audio/210824+Ep22_Jab+or+Jobs_Part+1_YouTube+FINAL_AUDIO+PODCAST.mp3

At the start of the video, Chris Martenson clarifies what the FDA did and didn't say, accompanied by this useful image:

https://projectavalon.net/Pfizer_'approval'.jpg

Links:
(looking at these, one can see how strongly Chris Martenson feels about all this. He'd not have been able to attach those to a YouTube video.)


NY Times: F.D.A. Fully Approves Pfizer-BioNTech’s Vaccine, a First for a Covid-19 Shot: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/23/health/pfizer-vaccine-approval-fda.html
FDA “Approves” Pfizer Vaccine: https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
What An Approval Letter Actually Reads Like: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2021/761178Orig1s000ltr.pdf
Member of FDA’s Expert Panel Resigns Over Controversial Alzheimer’s Therapy Approval: https://www.statnews.com/2021/06/08/fda-expert-panel-resigns-alzheimers-approval (https://www.statnews.com/2021/06/08/fda-expert-panel-resigns-alzheimers-approval/)
One-Third of New Drugs Had Safety Problems After FDA Approval: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/05/09/527575055/one-third-of-new-drugs-had-safety-problems-after-fda-approval
Mother Weeps As She Tells Senator How Pfizer Shot Left Her Daughter Wheelchair-Bound: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mother-weeps-as-she-tells-senator-how-pfizer-shot-left-her-daughter-wheelchair-bound (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mother-weeps-as-she-tells-senator-how-pfizer-shot-left-her-daughter-wheelchair-bound/)
Doctor Talks to NFL Team About Vaccines, Says Americans Should be ‘More Worried About Taking Aspirin’: https://nypost.com/2021/08/23/vaccine-hesitant-should-be-more-worried-about-taking-aspirin (https://nypost.com/2021/08/23/vaccine-hesitant-should-be-more-worried-about-taking-aspirin/)
These Can’t All Be Explained Away: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-cdc-injuries-deaths-covid-vaccines-fda-third-shot-immunocompromised (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-cdc-injuries-deaths-covid-vaccines-fda-third-shot-immunocompromised/)
Spectator: The Covid Vaccines May Affect Periods. Are We Allowed to Talk About This? https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-Covid-vaccines-may-affect-periods.-Are-we-allowed-to-talk-about-this
Comirnaty Side Effects: https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Comirnaty Fact Sheet: https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Legal Recourse? https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/covid-19-vaccines-and-employer-liability.aspx

[PurpleLama]

Something else that slipped by most people but imo extremely important, was what Dr Jane Ruby said in one of the videos posted here...

50 percent of all the people that have taken the Covid shot may have received a PLACEBO.

The Gov is keeping track of those people that got the placebo but individuals do not know if they received the actual Covid shot or the placebo. The Government is not telling the people anything but this would explain why people that thought they got the real Covid shot still ended up getting COVID virus. This is insane... Why hasn't the Gov told people that the reason they got Covid is because they first got a placebo.

We need to vet Dr. Jane Ruby. Something seems off about her. I think she might be in it for the money and attention.

[mojo]

Bill that was an amazing revelation in the above video about the gaslighting on approval by FDA. How can Biden Admin say that it was approved when it was not? This is shocking and so many people have not heard about this. Now they are using approval as a way to get companies, the military etc. to push vax.

edit: Bill can we change the title of this thread to FDA does not approve Covid shot
edit: Thank you for an even better precise title.
edit: Sometimes the cover-up is worse than the crime... Question to ponder. Why hasn't the FDA come out with a clarification yet? It's disgraceful not to alert the public when even the doctors believe it was approved.

I see that Bill updated his post above and this was the Brighteon video link.
https://www.brighteon.com/30271ddf-2931-4142-b5c1-012c775ed8cb

[Bill Ryan]

Chris Martenson had this video deleted from YouTube last night US time — the first time on his channel. Here it is on Odyssey:

Vaccine Mandates Are Here

https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2/vaccine-mandates-are-here

Also here as an MP3:

https://cm-us-standard.s3.amazonaws.com/audio/210824+Ep22_Jab+or+Jobs_Part+1_YouTube+FINAL_AUDIO+PODCAST.mp3

At the start of the video, Chris Martenson clarifies what the FDA did and didn't say, accompanied by this useful image:

https://projectavalon.net/Pfizer_'approval'.jpg

Links:
(looking at these, one can see how strongly Chris Martenson feels about all this. He'd not have been able to attach those to a YouTube video.)


NY Times: F.D.A. Fully Approves Pfizer-BioNTech’s Vaccine, a First for a Covid-19 Shot: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/23/health/pfizer-vaccine-approval-fda.html
FDA “Approves” Pfizer Vaccine: https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
What An Approval Letter Actually Reads Like: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2021/761178Orig1s000ltr.pdf
Member of FDA’s Expert Panel Resigns Over Controversial Alzheimer’s Therapy Approval: https://www.statnews.com/2021/06/08/fda-expert-panel-resigns-alzheimers-approval (https://www.statnews.com/2021/06/08/fda-expert-panel-resigns-alzheimers-approval/)
One-Third of New Drugs Had Safety Problems After FDA Approval: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/05/09/527575055/one-third-of-new-drugs-had-safety-problems-after-fda-approval
Mother Weeps As She Tells Senator How Pfizer Shot Left Her Daughter Wheelchair-Bound: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mother-weeps-as-she-tells-senator-how-pfizer-shot-left-her-daughter-wheelchair-bound (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mother-weeps-as-she-tells-senator-how-pfizer-shot-left-her-daughter-wheelchair-bound/)
Doctor Talks to NFL Team About Vaccines, Says Americans Should be ‘More Worried About Taking Aspirin’: https://nypost.com/2021/08/23/vaccine-hesitant-should-be-more-worried-about-taking-aspirin (https://nypost.com/2021/08/23/vaccine-hesitant-should-be-more-worried-about-taking-aspirin/)
These Can’t All Be Explained Away: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-cdc-injuries-deaths-covid-vaccines-fda-third-shot-immunocompromised (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-cdc-injuries-deaths-covid-vaccines-fda-third-shot-immunocompromised/)
Spectator: The Covid Vaccines May Affect Periods. Are We Allowed to Talk About This? https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-Covid-vaccines-may-affect-periods.-Are-we-allowed-to-talk-about-this
Comirnaty Side Effects: https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Comirnaty Fact Sheet: https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Legal Recourse? https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/covid-19-vaccines-and-employer-liability.aspx

~~~

Here's the video embedded. It's a good one. No wonder YouTube deleted it FAST. :facepalm:

https://projectavalon.net/Vaccine_Mandates_Are_Here_(Chris_Martenson).mp4

Vaccine Mandates Are Here

https://projectavalon.net/Vaccine_Mandates_Are_Here_(Chris_Martenson).mp4

[mojo]

Natural Immunity is best

Looking at the Israel National Health Study that provides real solid factual data to support the best treatment for Covid. The pie chart displayed on social media shows the breakdown. 60% of people currently with Covid are non-vaxed, and 39% of new cases are those that were already vaxed. 1% of current Covid cases are people with natural immunities built up from prior Covid. Another obvious point is we don't hear from the White House or Dr. Fauci about the use of current therapeutics such as anitbody monoclonal treatment. Yet we do see a huge push to force a treatment that is 59% effective.

[Satori]

COMIRNATY. Why that name? I wondered as soon as I saw it. This may be trivial, but indulge me if you will.

First, I see MRNA, or mRNA, in the name. It’s right there for all of us to see.

Second, I see the word COMITY or comity. Comity has two common meanings: a state of social harmony or, in the law, the act of one court or jurisdiction, deferring to another court or jurisdiction and yielding power and control.

Thus, mRNA comity. The jab brings social harmony. Or, social harmony through the jab.

And, here, Pfizer is yielding to BioNTech (even though they are essentially the same), and the FDA is going along with it, to allow BnT to take the lead in the next iteration of the poison jab. In the meantime, because there is no COMIRNATY the FDA is authorizing use of the Pfizer EUA poison to be used on people starting at age 12, and, along with the MSM, is misleading people into believing that what they are taking, if you are 16 or older, is FDA approved, when it is not. As if that made a difference.

[Gwin Ru]

The Right Side with Doug Billings - August 26, 2021 (https://rumble.com/vlpqcc-the-right-side-with-doug-billings-august-26-2021.html) 1:00:10

The Right Side with Doug Billings (https://rumble.com/c/DougBillings)
Published August 26, 2021

Rumble (https://rumble.com/) — Doug talks with Karen Kingston about Pfizer's FDA approval.
https://dougbillings.us/karen-kingston/


vj3k7c


Related:


Japan tested the Moderna vials, and they are magnetic. (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?115033-Why-do-magnets-stick-to-a-vaxxed-person-s-arm-at-the-injection-site&p=1448497&viewfull=1#post1448497)

[Kryztian]

COMIRNATY. Why that name? I wondered as soon as I saw it. This may be trivial, but indulge me if you will.


From https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/12/21/2148959/0/en/Pfizer-and-BioNTech-Receive-Authorization-in-the-European-Union-for-COVID-19-Vaccine.html


The vaccine will be marketed in the EU under the brand name COMIRNATY, which represents a combination of the terms COVID-19, mRNA, community, and immunity



* * * * *


Chris Martenson had this video deleted from YouTube last night US time — the first time on his channel. Here it is on Odyssey:

Vaccine Mandates Are Here

https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2/vaccine-mandates-are-here

At the start of the video, Chris Martenson clarifies what the FDA did and didn't say, accompanied by this useful image:


I am fairly certain that "Comirnaty", "BNT162b2" and "Tozinameran" are just three different trade names for the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID "vaccine", and there may be more. In the same way, Pfizer manufactures a medication "Sildenafil" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sildenafil) which is marketed under different trade names like "Revatio" and most famously "Viagra".

Pretty sure the original title of this thread was correct. The FDA really did approved a vaccine which has various names, but are all the same thing. (which is "death in a little vial") The only question is why does the FDA, a U.S. organization, use the European trade name in their documents?

On the other hand, I think Chris Martenson still has a good points that the approval only applies to certain instances - what are those instances???

[Satori]

L””
The approved jab has not even been produced????

vj06z6

Yes it is important to understand.

I just read the FDA letters to Pfizer and BioNTech, essentially the same company for purposes of these “vaccines”, and I also read a 5 or so page bullet point summary of these letters and related issues prepared by Dr. Malone and at least one other qualified person.

On the issue of what was approved and what a person would allow to be put into his or her body if he or she decided to get the mRNA jab because it has been “approved”, here’s the point Malone is making: if you got this jab today and for the next 6 to 9 months, or more, you would not be getting what the FDA approved. You would not get COMIRNATY. (Which is the same recipe as the EUA stuff.). You would be getting the existing EUA Pfizer jab crap that has been on the market for all this time.

To allow Pfizer to continue its windfall on the EUA poison, the FDA approved extending its use and shelf life for 6 to 9 months, and probably longer. Thus, if you get this jab, you are getting the EUA stuff, not the so-called approved COMIRNATY. (Which is supposed to be available by the end of 2021 or in 2022.). But they want you to think you are getting the approved stuff.

And this is only one of the serious problems with this mRNA jab, along with the continued absence of proof of safety, efficacy and necessity.

Another problem is the FDA is allowing 12 to 15 year old children to be given the EUA poison, while trying to give the impression that somehow there is a difference between the two jabs, when there is not, and one is no better than the other. They are both equally toxic and a threat to health and safety.

I’m feeling compelled to elaborate on the last paragraph of my post above.

It seems to me that one very important, if not critical, issue that seems to be overlooked about the FDA “approval” is that in addition to the fact that CORMINATY is not in production, and that anyone getting the Pfizer jab now and for the foreseeable future, is really getting the unapproved EUA crap, this “approval” actually allows Pfizer to market its existing inventory beyond its shelf life and give it to 12 year old children.

In short, whereas before the FDA “approval”, only people 16 or older were being told to get the Pfizer EUA jab, now parents are being told they can and should give their 12 year old children the Pfizer EUA jab, by misleading them into believing that what they will actually allow to be put into their children’s bodies is approved—when it is not.

Children are clearly being targeted. Including children as tender as age 2.

It’s appalling.

[Eric J (Viking)]

The FDA did NOT grant full approval to the Pfizer shots

Further reading here...

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/08/the_fda_did_not_grant_full_approval_to_the_pfizer_shots.html

You may have heard that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot received FDA approval this past Monday. Politicians, national health officials, and journalists are breathless with excitement about how this approval will finally induce the remaining "vaccine-hesitant" into stepping forward to receive their jab. The FDA even has a press release on its website about it.

Viking

[Kryztian]

I am fairly certain that "Comirnaty", "BNT162b2" and "Tozinameran" are just three different trade names for the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID "vaccine", and there may be more.


And now I am 100% certain. I just read the Pfizer approval letter (https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download). It states on page 2:


Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine contains a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 formulated in lipid particles. COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is the same formulation as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and can be used interchangeably with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.

It also states on the FDA's Press release:


Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine

So Chris Martenson is incorrect. He seems like an intelligent guy, but he did not read this letter very carefully. The FDA's approval extends to the Pfizer vaccine, regardless of whether the bottle says "Comirnaty" on it or not, and probably, soon, all the bottles will be labeled "Comirnaty" if the FDA is accurate in announcing Pfizer's marketing plans.

However, the post above by Viking with a link American Thinker may have some valid points about whether the vax has "FDA approval" or not.

[Gwin Ru]

...

... AUGUST 27, 2021 DR LI MENG YAN AND KAREN KINGSTON UNRESTRICTED WARFARE (https://www.steeltruth.com/?wix-vod-video-id=e515fc6cd5b9480ea232308c01ba1635&wix-vod-comp-id=comp-kl5lh1zq) 01:25:34 (interview of Karen Kingston starts at 0:30:00)

https://www.steeltruth.com/?wix-vod-video-id=e515fc6cd5b9480ea232308c01ba1635&wix-vod-comp-id=comp-kl5lh1zq


DR LI MENG YAN (interview starts at 43:30): ... mosquitoes as "vaccination" vectors...


Related:


BREAKING NEWS! AUGUST 23, 2021 KAREN KINGSTON BEATS BIG PHARMA (https://www.steeltruth.com/?wix-vod-video-id=df91dc71fa2644649a71d91c84e93b96&wix-vod-comp-id=comp-kl5lh1zq) 09:03

[mountain_jim]

An urgent Message from Chris Martenson (email - images not included here - also posted in Internet Censorship thread)
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?80790-Internet-Censorship-So-it-began...&p=1448888&viewfull=1#post1448888





Peak Prosperity Censored Again by YouTube!

No good deed goes unpunished.

I am sad, annoyed and angered to announce that a video of mine posted to YouTube on Tuesday August 24th entitled “Your Job or the Jab” was stricken by YouTube for “violating community standards.”

Sad because now tens if not hundreds of thousands of people will be denied access to quality, carefully researched information that could help their health and lives. Angered and annoyed because of the grotesque hypocrisy on display by YouTube, its staff, and every one of Google’s financial partners.

Such censorship has no place in our society. It is YouTube that is violating our cultural norms. They are acting like petty tyrants and authoritarians. How they are behaving is completely unacceptable to me and it should be completely unacceptable to you as well.

It bears pointing out that YouTube is a place where you can get your fill of Flat Earth theorists. Somehow that brand of misinformation with vast oceans of countervailing scientific evidence against it is A-OK by YouTube’s community standards.

Or perhaps we might note that YouTube allows and actively promotes the abusive, extremely creepy, child beauty pageants:

These are well within YouTube’s “community standards” but they are very far outside of my own.
The point here is that YouTube is anything but consistent, but they have turned into a censoring monster, actively working to suppress live-saving information in the midst of a critical time in a pandemic.

What did I do that was so worthy of censoring? I’m not sure because they won’t say, except I can note that I am not allowed to contradict the CDC, NIH or WHO (which I do all the time). Why? Because they get important things wrong all the time. I will place my track record of accuracy against those multibillion-dollar institutions any day and I will come out on top every day.

But perhaps it was that I dared to observe that hundreds of thousands of women have reported profound disruptions to their menstrual cycles after receiving vaccinations. This is a fact. It is also a fact that YouTube very recently expanded its list of banned topics to include mentioning side effects of “approved” Covid-19 vaccines:

I suppose the observation that women are experiencing profound disruptions to their menstrual cycles is a little too close to claims that the vaccines will cause infertility.

So in YouTube’s twisted world-view, it’s perfectly fine to opine that the world is flat while applying a thick coat of makeup to your bikini-clad 5 year-old, but it’s not okay to give voice to millions of women who have been impacted by the vaccines.

Perhaps most irritatingly, YouTube will be promoting some corporate nonsense about valuing diversity and being for women’s rights and empowerment, while they actively suppress a topic that desperately needs coverage.

Even if I am wrong about the connection between women’s fertility cycles and the vaccines my observation about cycle disruption should be allowed to stand, be vigorously debated, and then shot down with data.

But my instincts, and my track record, both say I am not wrong. I’d place a lot of money on being right about this too.
So let me remind everyone of some other key topics around which I was also badly out of step:

• Contradicting the WHO back on Jan 23rd 2020 when I first alerted the world to the pandemic on the loose.If YouTube was the same censor-happy company they have since become, that video would have been deleted.
• I was 100% against the CDC on mask wearing early on when they claimed they were useless, dangerous even, and then again when they failed to be in favor of proper masks worn in a proper way, but were instead for any sort of cottony gauze worn loosely.If YouTube was the same censor-happy company they have since become, those videos would have been deleted.
• My very early videos revealing the importance of Vitamin D, Zinc, Quercetin and Ivermectin all now proven to be effective at limiting the severity of Covid. If YouTube was the same censor-happy company they have since become millions of people would not have received my messages about the coming pandemic, how to prepare, and what the science was saying.

I am horrified by what YouTube has come to represent for all sorts of reasons.

First, I am a huge free-speech champion. If people want to debate the earth’s flatness, they can and should do that to their heart’s content. I simply don’t care to engage with them on that, but they should do that if that’s where they are ideologically.
Second, the many predicaments we face in the future will necessitate all sorts of extremely uncomfortable conversations and decisions some of which may be deeply embarrassing to the-powers-that-be. How can we have these conversations if simple recitations of the available data aren’t allowed?

Third, it’s wildly dangerous to assume we know right from wrong at his moment in history. Science is anything but settled. In fact I would submit our most critical learnings are before us not behind us. The only way we have any shot at creating a better future is by being brave enough to seek out and separate fact from fiction.

My staff and I are very concerned that YouTube will now reach into the past to retroactively label our earliest (and most accurate) Covid coverage as objectionable and cancel our entire channel. If they do this an entire decade of work – encompassing the Crash Course and all of my Covid and other market coverage – would be stricken and we’d lose access to our more than 400,000 subscribers. We’d have zero recourse. There’s nobody to speak to, no persons to appeal.

This is one of the many dangers of big tech.

The impact of being censored is chilling. We’ve already lost advertisers, meetings with companies we thought we might do business with, and worst of all, reaching our many subscribers with our special brand of fact-based ideas and concepts.

If the data provides us clues I will bring them to you. If the data changes, so will I. If that data is inconvenient or embarrassing to the powers that be, I will not flinch from the battle.

But know this; I will not change, and I will not back down. Wherever this all leads is where I am going, providing the exact same blend of hard-nosed science and intuition that has allowed me to be well in front of the lumbering health authorities and their censor-happy gate keepers.

Now, more than ever I am going to need your help. How the future turns out is up to all of us. You can help us by sharing our messages especially as we migrate to another much less well-traveled platform besides YouTube. We’re going to have to rebuild our audiences all over again.

My requests are simple. Help us grow by and reach more people by sharing my work as broadly as you can. Come join us at our new platforms over at Odysee (https://peakprosperity.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6f58f18058c0a361e9c400eb6&id=255eeabb2e&e=f6d498f713)and Rumble (https://peakprosperity.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=6f58f18058c0a361e9c400eb6&id=58887f7bbb&e=f6d498f713). Each has pros and cons, so we’re carefully weighing which will become our new home.

If you aren’t already, please consider joining our paying members who both receive enormous benefits from their memberships as well as provide us support as we continue to bring truth to a very resistant world. You can join here and continue to support our critical work.

Yours in Truth,
Chris

[Sue (Ayt)]

COMIRNATY. Why that name? I wondered as soon as I saw it. This may be trivial, but indulge me if you will.

First, I see MRNA, or mRNA, in the name. It’s right there for all of us to see.

Second, I see the word COMITY or comity. Comity has two common meanings: a state of social harmony or, in the law, the act of one court or jurisdiction, deferring to another court or jurisdiction and yielding power and control.

Thus, mRNA comity. The jab brings social harmony. Or, social harmony through the jab.

And, here, Pfizer is yielding to BioNTech (even though they are essentially the same), and the FDA is going along with it, to allow BnT to take the lead in the next iteration of the poison jab. In the meantime, because there is no COMIRNATY the FDA is authorizing use of the Pfizer EUA poison to be used on people starting at age 12, and, along with the MSM, is misleading people into believing that what they are taking, if you are 16 or older, is FDA approved, when it is not. As if that made a difference.

Yep.
Just did an image search for that word - "comity"
The agenda is blatant.
Thanks for making this association for us, Satori.
https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/media/catalog/product/9/7/9781800889347_1.jpg

[Bill Ryan]

About the name (which is truly terrible)... for what it may be worth.


https://qz.com/2051321/why-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-comirnaty-has-a-weird-name

The Pfizer vaccine’s brand name, Comirnaty, is weird for a reason

(extracted)

The meaning behind the name ‘Comirnaty’

The name Comirnaty was constructed with the help of a naming consultancy called the Brand Institute, according to a report (https://www.fiercepharma.com/marketing/pfizer-biontech-select-comirnaty-as-brand-name-for-covid-19-vaccine) in Fierce Pharma, a web site that tracks the drug industry. Comirnaty is an agglomeration of the words “Covid-19 immunity” and “mRNA,” the latter indicating the technology that makes the vaccine work. As a whole, the word is intended to evoke “community,” a Brand Institute executive said.
:focus:

[Satori]

About the name (which is truly terrible)... for what it may be worth.


https://qz.com/2051321/why-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-comirnaty-has-a-weird-name

The Pfizer vaccine’s brand name, Comirnaty, is weird for a reason

(extracted)

The meaning behind the name ‘Comirnaty’

The name Comirnaty was constructed with the help of a naming consultancy called the Brand Institute, according to a report (https://www.fiercepharma.com/marketing/pfizer-biontech-select-comirnaty-as-brand-name-for-covid-19-vaccine) in Fierce Pharma, a web site that tracks the drug industry. Comirnaty is an agglomeration of the words “Covid-19 immunity” and “mRNA,” the latter indicating the technology that makes the vaccine work. As a whole, the word is intended to evoke “community,” a Brand Institute executive said.
:focus:

See, too, post #66 above.

[Reinhard]

The meaning behind the name ‘Comirnaty’.........


........just had to mention it: the mysterious-evil antagonist of Sherlock-Holmes comes to (my) mind: Moriarty.......it has the same energetic ring to it...................
Ok,ok.....back to topic

[mojo]

When I first heard the new name this came to mind....

[Denise/Dizi]

Cross posting with a breaking bit of news concerning 12,000 adverse reactions within 28days (and no pre-existing diagnosis) in ONE STATE at 23:26

1XILh4AHlqY


COVID CON Solution Series: Your Boss Doesn't Own Your Body

Join esteemed panelists Pam Popper Founder of MakeAmericansFreeAgain.com, Lisa Parker Independent Union Labor Consultant, Lead Attorney Tom Renz and Host Reinette Senum as they show you how to decline getting the COVID shot without losing your job.

Your company doesn't own your body and therefore can't tell you what to do without your informed consent. Learn what your boss may not want you to know.

1XILh4AHlqY

I live in the little town where Reinette became "Mayor", (in this town the title of "Mayor" is a polite formality exchanged between council members... )

All too often she spoke her opinions, but neglected to differentiate between whether she was speaking her own personal opinions, or speaking as the "Mayor", on behalf of those in our community. And as such, town became a media circus, but not in a way that highlighted any significant issue...But more the drama unfolding around this woman... Any positive momentum she may have gotten, in any real effort to spark creative change? Got lost in the sea of reporters speaking about the chaos in our city, and sparked people to request she step down, or resign. And she had some GOOD IDEAS, but her methods to get those accomplished or even brought out, were a nightmare.

The aftermath is still being mopped up...

I will give my own personal opinions.... I didn't attend those circus events, for just that reason... I found it pathetic that our little progressive town be used as some side show. When many in my area ARE living the change they wish to see.. This drama divided the community more than uniting it... And any useful change that could have been moved upon during that time, was lost to this new circus...

The police, who were respected in our area, are now leaving in droves, and have been rotating out so quickly when she was involved, that it was sad to see... and it hasn't stopped since..

People are now posting BLM and Gay pride flags on their businesses, which in my belief actually divides the community, as before we never had issues with differences of races, or sexuality. Many business owners were gay, and we do have a substantial black community that blended in seemlessly. Now they cringe when they walk through town or see people holding signs on "Their behalf"... There wasn't a split in these communities, she created them by openly as "Mayor" behaving as if they were issues. She brought big city problems to a small town that wasn't experiencing them....
We now also have "Vaxers, and Anti-vaxers"... Mask wearers and non mask wearers.. The community is so divided now, that it isn't ev en funny, where as before we all were able to agree to disagree.. It's sad really...

These are just MY opinions however, I speak only for myself....

A positive thing... I do not dislike her, just feel she chose the wrong way to go about what she wished to accomplish...

I do believe that this video, where she is now speaking as a woman with beliefs, and trying to share actual information, without playing "politics" at the same time, is a much better fit for her. And I wish her well....

It's my opinion, that you aren't going to be able to change the government from within it. That system is already broken. It is better to attempt it in this way. With people of like minds teaching those around them, their true voice, their true rights, etc... I heard she may be trying to run for a larger office position within my state. I truly hope she rethinks this, as this is a much healthier fit for her, and her voice, and for any community that truly wants to change. They don't need to be told that everyone is bad, they need to know what is good. And this video is something people would respond to..

My community went from friendly and kind, to sarcastic, argumentative, and suspicious overnight after the circus left. Gay flags, police flags, BLM, painting on the streets... We never had any issues with ANY of those things until Reinette, and her supporters made them issues. By her sharing her personal beliefs, as "Mayor", and not suggesting that these were her own private beliefs, she inadvertently was representing the city leaders openly. What a disaster, because it wasn't true. And there are plenty of open disputes and meetings about her doing this... All recorded and can be found online. Just pull up Reinette Senum and Nevada City council, resignation, and the plethora of videos will begin to show up. The news articles, etc...

I hear she may be running Governor of California... I cringe to think that she may win a race... Not because of what she believes, but what she says.. As it is, in my small community we are still having a difficult time keeping the police chief position filled, and the police on patrol, as they're leaving to go to the town next door. The pay is better and they get treated better.

You can't have your "Mayor" telling the police that they "Incited" the shootings we recently went through as a nation. And she did this openly, and ended up on the evening news for having done so... It isn't good for local moral, to believe that your "Boss" essentially doesn't respect you... Yet she did, openly... While Mayor, without maintaining that this was her belief specifically, implying she was speaking for our city when making such claims... I really hope that she doesn't win, as she would probably do the same thing and create even more drama for California that isn't needed...

Stay on youtube Reinette, you can spark more positive change there... You truly can. Good luck, and I truly liked the video above, it IS helpful... And a better way to get across what I believe that you are trying to do...

[Pam]

Mod note from Bill:
I copied this post from its original location (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114253-Vaccine-Crimes&p=1449560&viewfull=1#post1449560) on the Vaccine Crimes (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114253-Vaccine-Crimes) thread.
:thumbsup:

~~~

This article is a must read for anyone that wants to understand the FDA "approval" scam, or as Dr. Malone calls it, “bureaucratic shell game”.

This is a journalistic masterpiece and is well worth your time if you want a glimpse into the evil and corruption of this bait and switch. Here's a little teaser, Guess where the "approved" and unavailable Comirnaty is being manufactured? If you guessed China, bingo!!!!



Scandal Behind the FDA Fake Approval of Pfizer Jab
Author: F. William Engdahl


The US Government regulator for drugs, the Food and Drug Administration, has just announced that it has voted full approval for the mRNA genetic vaccine of Pfizer and BioNTech, or did they? This supposed new status is being used by the Biden Administration and many states and companies to impose mandatory vaccinations. The notoriously conflicted Biden covid adviser, Tony Fauci of the NIAID, using that ruling, is calling for national mandatory vaccination for the country. What is not being revealed is the cesspool of corruption and conflicts of interest between the FDA and the major drug companies, including Pfizer, that stand behind the rushed approval. And it’s not full approval for Pfizer’s jab, only for BioNTech’s legally different vaccine.

“…final stamp of approval”?

On August 23 as the FDA announced full approval for the Pfizer mRNA gene-edited substance. Or not quite, when the full papers of FDA are studied. Fauci, whose NIAID has financial interest in the vaccine, referred to the FDA decision as the “final stamp of approval.” It is however anything but final or an impartial, scientific rigorous medical evaluation. Rather it is a politically-motivated decision by an FDA that is corrupt beyond the imagination of most people.

Backtracking on its statement in 2020 that it would hold normal FDA advisory committee hearings with independent experts to discuss the Pfizer application for full approval, now the FDA told the British Medical Journal that they did not believe a meeting was necessary ahead of granting full approval of what is the most controversial vaccine in modern history. The BMJ quotes Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, “These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorization.”

Witczak continued with the alarming note, “It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years. There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed.” Read that again, slowly. Pfizer tests destroyed their own control group mid-stream! And its six month rollout of the mRNA jab worldwide has resulted in catastrophic side effects which have been totally officially ignored. Is this “science” Dr Fauci?

The refusal of the FDA and its Acting Director, Janet Woodcock, to convene its Drugs Advisory Committee for discussion of the Pfizer and BioNTech decisions is even more shocking as in June three members of that same panel resigned in protest for being disregarded in another drug approval. NPR network reported, “Three experts have now resigned from a Food and Drug Administration advisory committee after the agency approved an Alzheimer’s drug called Aduhelm against the wishes of nearly every member on the panel.” One of the three, Dr. Aaron Kesselheim, in his resignation letter from the FDA Advisory Committee (June 10, 2021), wrote: “For both eteplirsen and aducanumab, the decisions by FDA administrators to ignore the Advisory Committee’s clear recommendations led to their approval of two highly problematic drugs that offered little evidence that they would meaningfully benefit patients…With eteplirsen, the AdComm (Advisory Committee) and FDA’s own scientific staff reported that there was no convincing evidence that the drug worked; both groups were overruled by FDA leadership… “

Now the FDA refusal to convene their advisory committee for the Pfizer decision is all the more astonishing in light of the fact that the Government Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in its official VAERS data bank for recording vaccine negative effects has recorded 8,508 reports of fatalities following the Pfizer mRNA shot in the past seven months, a number more than for all vaccines combined in the past 30 years. By denying a public hearing the FDA avoided any discussion of these alarming fatality numbers, let alone the tens of thousands of serious side-effects including heart attacks, blood clots, miscarriages, permanent paralysis following the Pfizer-BioNTech jabs. The public declaration by Fauci before approval that he expected it, is also unethical influencing, but that is the least of the crimes.

Faked Approval

It seems the FDA executed a clever ruse in which it issued separate rulings for a Pfizer Inc.-BioNTech vaccine which is widely used in the USA, and another ruling for the similar vaccine of Pfizer’s German-based partner and developer of the mRNA platform, BioNTech of Mainz. It is only BioNTech that got FDA approval, but conditioned on completion of a series of further tests on select groups including infants, pregnant women and youth, by 2027. The US vaccine, Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, only got extension of its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), not full approval!

In their separate letter to Pfizer, the FDA stated, “…On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of (Emergency Use) authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses…”(emphasis added).

Buried in a footnote in the letter the FDA admits there are two legally separate entities and vaccines—Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine and BioNTech GmbH of Mainz with its own vaccine trade-named Comrinaty. The FDA writes that “The products are legally distinct with certain differences…” Legally distinct means two separate vaccines. If you find this confusing it is meant to be. Only under an EUA ruling is Pfizer presently exempt from vaccine liability. Some lawyers are calling the FDA ruse a classic “bait and switch” tactic, a form of fraud based on deception.

US vaccinologist and a developer of the mRNA technique, Dr Robert Malone, has accused the FDA of playing a “bureaucratic shell game” with their supposed early approval of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. He cites the two separate FDA letters, “There is a letter for Pfizer and a letter for BioNTech. The New York Times and the Washington Post got it wrong. The authorization is not for Pfizer. The authorization is for BioNTech, and it will only be initiated at the time BioNTech product becomes available…”

Adding to the bizarre irregularities, in their two separate letters, one to BioNTech and another to Pfizer, the FDA repeatedly deletes the location of the vaccine manufacturing they approve. Why that? Is it in China where BioNTech has a joint agreement with Fosun Pharma of Shanghai to jointly produce and market Comirnaty vaccine for COVID-19? Why do they need to hide that location data from the public? Would it expose the entire fraud?

FDA-Pfizer Conflicts of Interest

In 2019 Pfizer made a very conflicted appointment to its board of directors. It took Scott Gottlieb, who had just resigned as head of the FDA three months earlier. If this gives an appearance of a huge conflict of interest, it is. Alongside Gottlieb at Pfizer’s Board of Directors sits Dr Susan Desmond-Hellmann, who headed the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation until 2020. The Gates Foundation is behind every single key part of the covid vaccine rush and owns stock in Pfizer to boot.

Another person who links Pfizer and Gates is Prof. Holly Janes, a bio-statistical expert in Gates’ hometown Seattle, at the Fred Huff cancer research center. Janes is also a member of the FDA Vaccine Committee until 2023. Notably, she co-designed the controversial trials for both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines for Fauci’s NIAID from her Seattle center, which is also funded by the Gates Foundation.

Janes is Professor at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, known as Fred Hutch. Earlier she received Gates Foundation research money for a six year period when she worked for the Gates Foundation from 2006 to 2012 to develop “statistical and study design support for pre-clinical vaccine performance trials.” Prof. Janes also helped develop the program that tracks vaccine data at John Hopkins University.

The person who runs FDA as “Acting Director” is Janet Woodcock. To call her tainted is mild. She has been at FDA since 1986, almost as long as Fauci at NIAID. Woodcock was Biden’s choice to head FDA, but a massive opposition from 28 groups including state attorneys general and citizen groups forced him to name her “acting,” which does not need Congressional scrutiny.

Woodcock was directly responsible for the FDA approval of deadly opioids over the objections of her own scientists and other advisors. Two decades ago as head of the FDA unit responsible, Woodcock was instrumental in the approval of a powerful opioid, Zohydro, even though the FDA’s own scientific advisory committee voted 11-2 to keep the drug off the market because it was unsafe. The online Drugs.com writes, “Hydrocodone (Zohydro) can slow or stop your breathing. Never use Zohydro ER in larger amounts, or for longer than prescribed. .. Swallow it whole to avoid exposure to a potentially fatal dose. Hydrocodone may be habit-forming, even at regular doses.” Woodcock later approved the sale of a high-strength narcotic pill, OxyContin, as “safer and more effective than other painkillers” based on the false claims of the now bankrupt manufacturer, Purdue Pharma. Some 500,000 Americans have since died as a result of opioid addiction.

Woodcock clearly is the key FDA person behind the duplicitous August 23 Pfizer decision, seeing to it that there were no public advisory hearings to review relevant data. It would be relevant to know what discussions or communications went on with her former boss, now Pfizer director, Scott Gottlieb.

Why?

There are many unanswered question in this twisted tale of corruption at FDA and Pfizer. Was this theater rushed through by the Biden Administration to accelerate the forced vaccination of millions of Americans uncertain or skeptical of taking an emergency or experimental jab? Why is there such an incredible pressure from mainstream media and politicians to vaccinate every man, woman and now child in the US? Are the vaccines really safe if there are so many dire cases of adverse events after the Pfizer jab? Why did the FD refuse to allow its independent vaccine committee to weigh in?

It is worth noting that as of August 14 Pfizer does not mandate vaccines for its own employees. Also the Biden White House does not mandate vaccines for its staff. These are all serious issues that demand serious and honest answers.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

https://journal-neo.org/2021/08/30/scandal-behind-the-fda-fake-approval-of-pfizer-jab (https://journal-neo.org/2021/08/30/scandal-behind-the-fda-fake-approval-of-pfizer-jab/)

[Bill Ryan]

In the first (approx) 15 minutes of this new interview with Mike Adams published yesterday, Dr David Martin lays out his analysis of the FDA letters. It might possibly help to offer some clarity.

https://brighteon.com/309412a4-65e5-4bd6-a7c9-52805b5a6b93

309412a4-65e5-4bd6-a7c9-52805b5a6b93

[Kryztian]

Four Questions about Cominarty


Was Cominrnaty "fully approve?"


Is Cominrnaty on the market?


Is Cominrnaty "interchangeable" with the Pfizer-Biontech shot?


Does Cominrnaty make COVID shot mandates legal?


The answer to all four questions is "NO" which are explained after the (22:25) minute mark in this interview of Alix Meyer by Steve Kirsch.

https://rumble.com/vqqb06-alix-mayer-explains-why-the-drug-companies-are-targeting-kids.html

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/2/q/r/R/2qrRc.caa.mp4?u=usxns&b=0[/QUOTE]

[Ewan]

Four Questions about Cominarty


Was Cominrnaty "fully approve?"


Is Cominrnaty on the market?


Is Cominrnaty "interchangeable" with the Pfizer-Biontech shot?


Does Cominrnaty make COVID shot mandates legal?


The answer to all four questions is "NO" which are explained after the (22:25) minute mark in this interview of Alix Meyer by Steve Kirsch.

https://rumble.com/vqqb06-alix-mayer-explains-why-the-drug-companies-are-targeting-kids.html

------------------------------------

Clicking your link gets a 404 not found.
Was it this video?

Edit: No, would appear to be that answer.

vnwkmw

[lake]

Clicking your link gets a 404 not found.
Was it this video?

Edit: No, would appear to be that answer.


I think your close enough correct but the video I found from an inspection of the linked video leads to this one .... the link is direct (taken from Rumble but their source and savable .... pause, right click, save video as)

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/2/q/r/R/2qrRc.caa.mp4?u=usxns&b=0

[Kryztian]

Thanks Lake and Ewan. I never embedded a Rumble vid before and it is now fixed in my post above! :sun: