Arizona Audits Anyone?

[thepainterdoug]

Maybe its just me but I feel Im living in alternate realities more every day now. My mind can only take so much counter intuitive, conflicting reality, before it just starts to stall in exhaustion.

well for what its worth to anyone, here are some numbers of the audit. But what are numbers right? just old paradigm non "woke "digits right. ahh just a little off, so the MSM can say, nothing to see here.
Vince McMahon of pro wrestling would say, just say you won, even if you didn't .

https://outline.com/5GDKV7
from the article/
Canvass showed over 3,400 more ballots were cast than recorded
Over 9,000 more mail-in ballots were received and recorded than the official number of mail-in ballots sent out by the county
Precincts show more ballots cast on election day than people who showed up to vote. 1,551 extra votes.
Approximately 2,500 ballots were shown in the early vote returns that do not have a voter listed as casting them.
Over 255,000 early votes shown in the county final vote file do not have a corresponding entry in the early voting returns file
Over 23,000 voted by mail after moving after the October 5th cutoff
2,382 voters cast votes in Maricopa county, in person, after moving out of the county
Over 2,000 voters who moved out of Arizona during the 29 days before the election were given a full ballot instead of a presidential-only ballot.
Close to 300 deceased voters potentially vote.
There is an unprecedented number of discrepancies in the vote total. This could only happen through malicious actions or severe incompetence from Maricopa county officials.
Even without listing all of the issues that were uncovered, there were still too many discrepancies to declare an outright winner of Arizona’s electoral votes.

Arizona MUST decertify.

[PurpleLama]

https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/1794?single

A letter from legislators from several states.

[Zamolxe]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/maricopa-county-audit-concludes-similar-vote-total-to-2020-presidential-election

The republican audit in Maricopa "found the numbers from the audit were close to the numbers from the November election".

"The auditor's final hand count - which quadruple-checked every single one of the 2.1 million ballots - matches Maricopa County's official machine count"


So the physical ballot hand recount matched the official machine count.

If that is so, it means that the dominion machines did not switch votes from Trump to Biden.
What does that tell us about the credibility of the people who for months have said with full certainty that:

the machines switched votes
the vote tally databases were hacked
the italians hacked the machines through satellites


The machines count the physical ballots. The audit did a hand recount of the same physical ballots. The machine count matches the republican audit.

So any claims about hacked machines and switched votes are 100% lies.

Again, what does that say about the credibility of the persons pushing these lies for the past almost one year (Giuliani, Sydney Powell, Lin Wood, Donald Trump)?

[Gracy]

Okay, well first off in calling for Arizona to decertify, full audits should be conducted nationwide in counties of like size and demographic, to see if these numbers (which are also in dispute) were indeed indicative of some funny business in just Maricopa county alone, or if this sort of thing is both common and systemic nationwide. This I believe would be the truly objective way of looking at it anyway, not just through the eyes of those already yearning for a certain result one way or another. Does that make sense?

If you're before a court of law, do you want the jury's minds already made up even before the proceedings begin?

And second, speaking of objectivity, or lack thereof: The Gateway Pundit is a highly partisan outlet, and that would likely be the reason they left out the most important number of all, that Biden actually came away with more votes than he had to begin with.

That's the bottom line number Doug, the auditors themselves showed that Biden actually came away with more than 300 votes than he had before. It's over. But it's not over, in that the 2024 republican nomination is Trump's if he wants it, so in that respect it's not over. He'd likely beat any tired old retread the democrats choose to trot out next.

[thepainterdoug]

Zamolxe / hence my alternate reality.

I don't know, I wasn't there.

[mountain_jim]

https://gab.com/threesevens

https://gab.com/threesevens/posts/106989962135290875



Some highlights from Dr. Shiva:

- images of ballot envelopes with an approval stamp behind the basic graphics of the envelope, suggesting tampering
- Heat map showing signature legibility percentage flipped from 95% legible and 5% illegible four weeks before the election to an inverse relationship of 5% legible and 95% illegible four days after the election
- 34,448 duplicates from 17126 voters. County reported 0
- 1,919 blank signatures stamped as approved. County Reported 1,455
- 587 bad signatures. County reported 0
- 934 late returns. County Reported 0
- 2580 scribbles. County reported 0
- 25% surge in duplicates from November 4th to November 9th




Full Report - Pattern Recognition Classification ....

https://c692f527-da75-4c86-b5d1-8b3d5d4d5b43.filesusr.com/ugd/2f3470_05deb65815ab4d4b83938d71bc53459b.pdf


https://c692f527-da75-4c86-b5d1-8b3d5d4d5b43.filesusr.com/ugd/2f3470_05deb65815ab4d4b83938d71bc53459b.pdf

synchronicity alert for me: Reading final chapters of William Gibson's Pattern Recognition this morning. :)


comment in thread




A-Dog-With-A-Torch
@Matthew_Dimock
·
3h
@threesevens Yet, not worthy of a report at all on any Media outlet outside of Newsmax and OAN. Breitbart hasn’t said anything about it either. As an IT professional, I found the reporting on the computers to be shocking. The cyber security was non-existent. If anything was proven it was that these “secure” elections were anything but secure.



https://cdn.nucleusfiles.com/ec/eca8d536-5aed-4067-aff3-d50d6ef15120/cyber-ninjas-report-vol.-i.pdf


https://cdn.nucleusfiles.com/ec/eca8d536-5aed-4067-aff3-d50d6ef15120/cyber-ninjas-report-vol.-i.pdf

[thepainterdoug]

Thanks Gracie, well guess we will have to see the other audits going forward as well. And where the Gateway Pundit is partisan, they counterpoint the others that are partisan on the other side. So who said Biden gained in numbers? are they partisan? whos going to check? will the checkers be partisan?
So again, it should be the numbers. The truth. And once Im satisfied with that, I will end my questioning and move on.
By 2024, the damage will already be done.

[Satori]

Okay, well first off in calling for Arizona to decertify, full audits should be conducted nationwide in counties of like size and demographic, to see if these numbers (which are also in dispute) were indeed indicative of some funny business in just Maricopa county alone, or if this sort of thing is both common and systemic nationwide. This I believe would be the truly objective way of looking at it anyway, not just through the eyes of those already yearning for a certain result one way or another. Does that make sense?

If you're before a court of law, do you want the jury's minds already made up even before the proceedings begin?

And second, speaking of objectivity, or lack thereof: The Gateway Pundit is a highly partisan outlet, and that would likely be the reason they left out the most important number of all, that Biden actually came away with more votes than he had to begin with.

That's the bottom line number Doug, the auditors themselves showed that Biden actually came away with more than 300 votes than he had before. It's over. But it's not over, in that the 2024 republican nomination is Trump's if he wants it, so in that respect it's not over. He'd likely beat any tired old retread the democrats choose to trot out next.

You’ve got to be kidding. Either you don’t understand what what presented or you are promoting the mainstream lie for reasons unrelated to reality. Same for Zamolxe.

Of course the total vote count will be the same more or less. But you have to subtract from the total the fraudulent ballots. The audit and especially the canvass shows there were 10s of thousands of fraudulent ballots in Maricopa county alone.

If I give you $100 but $50 of those dollars are counterfeit you will still count $100. But a closer examination will show that only $50 is legitimate bona fide legal tender. The other $50 is fake. Thus you only got $50, not $100.

Further, the election laws recognize a canvass, as was also done in AZ, as a, if not the, valid way to verify the actual legitimate votes. It is the canvass numbers that further prove the fraud in AZ. The audit established, in addition, that the vote counting machines were not only hackable, but were in fact hacked and much important data, that was required by law to be retained and preserved, was wiped and destroyed.

Your argument brings to mind the word disingenuous.

[thepainterdoug]

Thanks Satori. Seems like logic, which has seemingly been cancelled.

BTW I am not now nor ever have been a sore looser, and especially not about something Im not actually participating in.

I am just truly turned on and tuned in to something called the truth. If I can actually get it, mission accomplished.

[Gracy]

Your argument brings to mind the word disingenuous.

Oh come on now Satori, we can agree to disagree, but I don’t see a need to be casting shadows on my integrity over this. I call em like I see em, and I do not bulls**t around on matters of substance. Ever.

Far be it from me to be stumping for Biden, as I’ve iterated several times I have no use for the guy. I’m just going by the final number and result the auditors themselves put out there, if that makes me disingenuous, or a comma or whatever, then I reckon that’s just the way it has to be.

What do you want me to say? That Trump really won Arizona after all, and the audit proves it?

[avid]

There’s no arguing with Gracy May is there, always right in her own point of view, and a moderator as well.
I find it very difficult to read these discussions as there is always a ‘holier than thou’ threat, which makes it hard to follow a reasonable thread, so loads of us sadly don’t participate to avoid confrontation. Gracy May, please take a chill pill, and get off that ‘high horse’ you portray, as I’m hoping that’s not really you at all. :heart:

[Satori]

Your argument brings to mind the word disingenuous.

Oh come on now Satori, we can agree to disagree, but I don’t see a need to bring my integrity in question over this.

Far be it from me to be stumping for Biden, as I’ve iterated several times I have no use for the guy. I’m just going by the final number and result the auditors themselves put out there, if that makes me disingenuous, or a comma or whatever, then I reckon that’s just the way it has to be.

What do you want me to say? That Trump really won Arizona after all, and the audit proves it?

What I’m saying is that the canvass and the audit prove that the AZ election results are inextricably tainted by election fraud and that it cannot be determined that either candidate won AZ and, thus, the certification must be decertified. That in turn affects the electoral vote count. Some questions then becomes: What next? Another election? When? How? What difference will it make? How long will all of this be tangled up in federal court? What will the SCOTUS do if and when the issue gets there?

This is uncharted legal territory, which is conducive to the criminals getting away with this in the short term. And they know that.

To be clear, what I’m advocating for here is election integrity and accountability. But, also, there is no doubt in my mind that Biden/Harris et al. are illegitimate, unconstitutional usurpers.

[Zamolxe]

Disclaimer: I despise Biden and the democrats.
Looks like it is necessary to point that out before any post...


Either you don’t understand what what presented or you are promoting the mainstream lie for reasons unrelated to reality. Same for Zamolxe.

It seems that you don't understand what I've said, so I'll repeat it.

The fact that the audit produced the same result as the official machine count means that the voting machines were not hacked.

Trump has been stating for months that the machines were hacked and that they switched votes. And that there is evidence of this.

How could there be evidence of the machines being hacked, if the hackers haven't changed any results?


The most powerful man in the world, the US president, with access to all the possible information... continuously claimed that the machines were hacked.
All the while never producing any evidence to back this up.
He made a verifiable false claim about an event which, if true, would amount to one of the biggest frauds in history: Biden stealing the US elections.

Why did this happen? Why did he also promote other verifiable and since then debunked claims?

If the election was stolen and he had evidence about it, why would he muddy the waters and promote these now confirmed lies and not stick to the actual real process through which the election was stolen? And for which he would actually have evidence to provide (still waiting after 10 months).

Why did he lie about the machines being hacked?

Because this was all just a shouting match. From his position of power he threw around all possible theories, hoping that something would stick. It was nothing but propaganda.

The phrase “A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth” is attributed to the Nazi propagandist, Joseph Goebbels.

We now see that the machines were not hacked. And Trump, from his position of immense power, lied about it constantly.

I am sorry that cognitive dissonance will kick in and you will consider this a personal attack... but someone has to say it.

It was all a grift. You have been conned.

"Donations under $8K to Trump ‘election defense’ instead go to president, RNC"
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-election-trump-fundraising-insigh-idINKBN27R30B

"Poll: Two-thirds of Republicans still think the 2020 election was rigged"
https://www.aol.com/news/poll-two-thirds-republicans-still-165934571.html

The most successful grift in history... only because people blindly believe anything, without thinking for themselves and discerning information. They accept being spoon-fed lies.

[TomKat]

There were only a few people that needed to be threatened or blackmailed to have the recount line up with a Biden victory. They already signalled this would happen when they kept putting it off with covid concerns, etc. You really expected a truthful result when there are people who can order the entire world into fake pandemic lockdown, not to mention Nov 3rd rigged US election?

[mojo]

Hi Doug,
Its great news from the Arizona audit! There was so much evidence of machine fraud & tampering & cover up. The Biden Admin is dead in the crib and soon Audits from other States will validate what we all know that President Trump won... Make America Great Again!

[Zamolxe]

There was so much evidence of machine fraud & tampering & cover up.

What evidence of machine fraud?

I genuinely don't know if you're being sarcastic

[ExomatrixTV]

1441562317687181314


source (https://twitter.com/NationalFile/status/1441562317687181314)



Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit:


sAAu6O33rNE


DECERTIFY: Arizona Audit Finds Trump Won State By Large Margin (https://www.infowars.com/posts/decertify-arizona-audit-finds-trump-won-state-by-large-margin/)

The same state that was declared win for Biden by Fox waayyyy too early.

[mojo]

What evidence of machine fraud?

Here's one example but there was much more from Cyber Nijas and Dr Sheeva. This was from the guest Randy one of speakers at the hearing mentioned machine tampering by at least by a few state employees which was captured on video. They were caught deleting election information that was supposed to be held for 22 months. The video itself proves there was fraud & a crime.

https://rumble.com/vmy49r-arizona-files-deleted-pre-az-audit.html

vkby51

[Zamolxe]

The machines count the physical ballots. The machine count matched the hand recount.

So the machines did not switch votes.

If they were tampered with, what was the purpose?

[PurpleLama]

There was so much evidence of machine fraud & tampering & cover up.

What evidence of machine fraud?

I genuinely don't know if you're being sarcastic

You did not watch the hearing?

[Zamolxe]

Do you not understand that the audit proved that the machines worked flawlessly?
The hand count matched the machine count.

The machines performed their job without issues. Why are we still saying that they were tampered with?

[mojo]

Zamoixe that is simply not true. But hold on you won't have to wait much longer. Come back and talk soon...

[Ernie Nemeth]

I watched every minute of the hearing (it was long and tedious). Just like I watched all the hearings months back (also long, boring and tedious). I have heard all the evidence first hand.

In my opinion, although I wished it had been more sensational, there was sufficient evidence to prove fraud, overturn the results of the state, and certainly provides plenty of evidence of perjury to convict the many that have sworn there was no election machine internet connectivity. The evidence also proves that, in fact, the 2020 elections were not the most secure election in the history of the world.

The worst thing they proved is that the election results and data regarding election activity was intentionally altered after the fact. That is a Federal offence - a felony.

That by itself negates the results of the election in that state.

[Zamolxe]

Zamoixe that is simply not true. But hold on you won't have to wait much longer. Come back and talk soon...

What isn't true? Could you be more specific?

Let me know which of these statements isn't/aren't true:

1. the machines count physical ballots
2. the multiple hand recounts of the physical ballots produced the same results as the machines
3. the conclusion is that the machines did their job without error
4. as a result, the machines were not tampered with

[mojo]

The cover-up always gets you...

1. they are not sentient beings they require human input
2. Counts are not audits cmon man...
3. lol
4.cmon man

[Zamolxe]

I don't understand, sorry.

1. so what if they require human input? I don't get your point. Don't the machines count the physical ballots?
2. again, I don't get your point. the Maricopa audit included multiple hand recounts
"The auditor's final hand count - which quadruple-checked every single one of the 2.1 million ballots - matches Maricopa County's official machine count"
3. ?
4. ?

[mojo]

No worries Arizona only kicks the audits off, I wont try to convince you. Soon the silent war will bubble to the surface and even the blind will see.

[Zamolxe]

Convince me of what?




Zamoixe that is simply not true. But hold on you won't have to wait much longer. Come back and talk soon...

What isn't true? Could you be more specific?

Let me know which of these statements isn't/aren't true:

1. the machines count physical ballots
2. the multiple hand recounts of the physical ballots produced the same results as the machines
3. the conclusion is that the machines did their job without error
4. as a result, the machines were not tampered with


I've asked you specific questions and you can't give me a straight answer.


Last try....

Let's say we have a box with 100 ballots - 40 for candidate X, 60 for candidate Y.
We also have a machine that counts ballots.

We run the ballots through the machine and it produces the following results: 40 for candidate X, 60 for candidate Y.

We then do a manual count of the ballots and get the same results: 40 for candidate X, 60 for candidate Y.

Doesn't that mean that the machine works perfectly?

If someone has been saying for the past 10 months that the machines have been tampered with/hacked and they move votes from candidate X to candidate Y.... Wouldn't that person be a liar?

[PurpleLama]

Convince me of what?




Zamoixe that is simply not true. But hold on you won't have to wait much longer. Come back and talk soon...

What isn't true? Could you be more specific?

Let me know which of these statements isn't/aren't true:

1. the machines count physical ballots
2. the multiple hand recounts of the physical ballots produced the same results as the machines
3. the conclusion is that the machines did their job without error
4. as a result, the machines were not tampered with


I've asked you specific questions and you can't give me a straight answer.


Last try....

Let's say we have a box with 100 ballots - 40 for candidate X, 60 for candidate Y.
We also have a machine that counts ballots.

We run the ballots through the machine and it produces the following results: 40 for candidate X, 60 for candidate Y.

We then do a manual count of the ballots and get the same results: 40 for candidate X, 60 for candidate Y.

Doesn't that mean that the machine works perfectly?

If someone has been saying for the past 10 months that the machines have been tampered with/hacked and they move votes from candidate X to candidate Y.... Wouldn't that person be a liar?

So person X lost by 20 votes. Then, an audit occurs and 35 votes are proven to be un-auditable, and may be proven fraudulent.

What do you do with that election?

[Bill Ryan]

Last try....Good! :)

[Zamolxe]

So person X lost by 20 votes. Then, an audit occurs and 35 votes are proven to be un-auditable, and may be proven fraudulent.

What do you do with that election?


That's not my point, it would be a different discussion.

My point was that the audit proved the machines were not hacked and that they didn't switch votes.

But Trump has been claiming this for the past 10 months.

¤=[Post Update]=¤





Last try....Good! :)

Why is that good Bill? :p :o :silent:

[PurpleLama]

So person X lost by 20 votes. Then, an audit occurs and 35 votes are proven to be un-auditable, and may be proven fraudulent.

What do you do with that election?


That's not my point, it would be a different discussion.

My point was that the audit proved the machines were not hacked and that they didn't switch votes.

But Trump has been claiming this for the past 10 months.

You did not watch the hearing. The opposite is actually true. They searched the unallocated space on the hard drive and found thousands of web searches on a machine that legally was supposed to remain air gapped. While that does not prove that the machine was "hacked", does that not raise your suspicion that it could have been? This is on a network that was never, ever supposed to be connected to the internet.

They proved that there were thousands of voters who had 2, 3, 4 and some who even had 12 votes counted. They proved that thousands of votes were counted that had no signature, and many thousands more who had an illegible signature.

Please, if you are going to argue about this, at least know what you are talking about. Your arguments so far are just trolling.

[Zamolxe]

So person X lost by 20 votes. Then, an audit occurs and 35 votes are proven to be un-auditable, and may be proven fraudulent.

What do you do with that election?


That's not my point, it would be a different discussion.

My point was that the audit proved the machines were not hacked and that they didn't switch votes.

But Trump has been claiming this for the past 10 months.

You did not watch the hearing. The opposite is actually true. They searched the unallocated space on the hard drive and found thousands of web searches on a machine that legally was supposed to remain air gapped. While that does not prove that the machine was "hacked", does that not raise your suspicion that it could have been? This is on a network that was never, ever supposed to be connected to the internet.

The machine counted the votes correctly.

What difference would it make if it was connected or not to the internet?

Its sole purpose is to count votes. The sole purpose of this election was to count the votes. The machine did that perfectly.
Trump said that the machine moved votes from Trump to Biden. It has been proven to be a lie.

Why would I even care if it was hacked or not, if the hackers did not change the results?

(And why would I believe any of these claims - hard drives, internet connectivity, etc. - made by the persons that have been claiming for the past months that the machines switched votes - which we now know was a complete lie)

[PurpleLama]

So person X lost by 20 votes. Then, an audit occurs and 35 votes are proven to be un-auditable, and may be proven fraudulent.

What do you do with that election?


That's not my point, it would be a different discussion.

My point was that the audit proved the machines were not hacked and that they didn't switch votes.

But Trump has been claiming this for the past 10 months.

You did not watch the hearing. The opposite is actually true. They searched the unallocated space on the hard drive and found thousands of web searches on a machine that legally was supposed to remain air gapped. While that does not prove that the machine was "hacked", does that not raise your suspicion that it could have been? This is on a network that was never, ever supposed to be connected to the internet.

The machine counted the votes correctly.

What difference would it make if it was connected or not to the internet?

Its sole purpose is to count votes. The sole purpose of this election was to count the votes. The machine did that perfectly.
Trump said that the machine moved votes from Trump to Biden. It has been proven to be a lie.

Why would I even care if it was hacked or not, if the hackers did not change the results?

(And why would I believe any of these claims - hard drives, internet connectivity, etc. - made by the persons that have been claiming for the past months that the machines switched votes - which we now know was a complete lie)

IT WAS NOT A DAMNED RECOUNT.

Sheesh, dude. I give up. Watch the hearing, or at least some highlights of the hearing, before posting any more.

I don't give a flying flip what Trump said about all this. The topic of the thread is the Arizona Audit, not what T said, not what the recount established.

[mojo]

Here's a good analysis on the Arizona audit (opening story) plus a lot more...

https://rumble.com/vmyfj3-episode-1290-the-arizona-count-is-in.html

vkc9ed

[PurpleLama]

I doubt Z will bother watching, mojo. Nice try, though.

[Ernie Nemeth]

So silly. As if this is about the ballot counting machines.

The best part was when they synced the video with the time stamp corresponding to some of the intrusions, and claim they have matched faces to the crimes. haha let's see them get out of that one

By the way, really clever criminals those Democrats, using the same password and files so that they remained anonymous during their criminal activity.

[Zamolxe]

I doubt Z will bother watching, mojo. Nice try, though.

I've just started it, just because I would feel like an idiot if I didn't. But still, I don't understand how this will change anything that I have said.

The audit consisted of multiple recounts. The recounts concluded that the machines worked perfectly. Trump said the machines switched votes. So he lied.

If you want to talk about all the other claims made in this video, there are multiple fact checks that show all of these are 100% manipulations.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/uknews/fact-checking-the-maricopa-county-election-audit-37739-problematic-voters/vi-AAONl8e

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/09/24/rebutting-trumps-claims-about-fraud-arizona-point-by-point/

I wonder if you will go through any of these. I don't want to be a hypocrite, so that's why I'm watching the Steve Bannon video.

[mountain_jim]

https://arizonasuntimes.com/2021/09/25/maricopa-county-audit-results-reveal-someone-was-caught-on-video-illegally-deleting-hundreds-of-thousands-of-election-files-the-day-before-the-audit-started/

(links at link)



Maricopa County Audit Results Reveal Someone Was Caught on Video Illegally Deleting Hundreds of Thousands of Election Files the Day Before the Audit Started

Arizona Senate Republicans issued the results of the independent ballot audit they conducted of the 2020 presidential and U.S. Senate election in Maricopa County Friday during a presentation, showing findings that numerous election laws were broken and security measures breached.

One of the most startling findings came from Ben Cotton, the founder of CyFIR. He said hundreds of thousands of election files — which the Maricopa County Supervisors refused to allow the auditors to examine — were deleted the day before the audit began, a violation of federal law which requires federal election records to be retained for 22 months. Although the name of the account that deleted them was not tied to a specific election worker, Cotton said there is video of the person who accessed those servers at that time.

Cotton said the flaws in security were so serious that the voting machines could have been hacked within minutes. “The vulnerabilities that exist on these systems would take an average script kitty less than ten minutes to get access to these systems,” Cotton said. “Our election systems were not secured, I assure you.”

The audit report consisted of an analysis of voters’ signatures on mail-in ballot envelopes, a report from Cyber Ninjas focusing on duplicate ballots and extra ballots, CyFIR’s report on security problems, the results of the ballot hand count, and an analysis of which laws were broken.

Senate President Karen Fann (R-Prescott) and Sen. Warren Petersen (R-Mesa) conducted the proceedings. Petersen pointed out that while it’s the largest audit of its kind ever, it’s “not a complete audit due to the lack of cooperation and obstruction from the county.”

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai of EchoMail presented the analysis of signatures on mail-in ballot envelopes. He painstakingly showed how the acceptance rate of ballots with questionable signatures got increasingly sloppier as the days went on leading up to the election and afterwards, until it was clearly violating the law as to what ballots were being accepted.

He found that 17,126 voters had their votes erroneously recorded twice — but the official Maricopa County results showed no record of that. Notably, there was a huge surge of these duplicate ballots accepted in the four days after the election. Joe Biden won the presidential election in Arizona by just over 10,400 votes. Ayyadurai’s 99-page report ended with listing several anomalies, and demanding answers from the Maricopa County Supervisors regarding them.

Doug Logan, the CEO of CyberNinjas, discussed several discrepancies, including around 9,000 more ballots received than had been mailed out, and about 255,000 early votes that had no corresponding entry in the system.

Cotton’s presentation on cybersecurity was next, where he went over a long list of security breaches, including shared accounts, shared passwords, and remote access. He said he could not make a full determination on many of the discrepancies, such as atypical anonymous logins, because the Supervisors refused to turn over key logs. Some of the deleted files included presidential votes. He found that contrary to the Supervisors’ claims, the machines were used to access the internet — thousands of times. There were bootable hard drives that hadn’t been approved, which contained election information from other states, Washington and South Carolina.

Former Arizona Republican Party Chairman Randy Pullen, an accountant, said the hand count came up with close to the same results as the official count. Biden ended up with 99 extra votes and Trump 261 fewer votes.

Former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, the official liaison between the Senate Republicans and the independent audit, explained how various laws were violated, including A.R.S. 16-550, which states that an election worker “shall compare the signatures” on the envelope returning a ballot with the voter registration records for that voter. Maricopa County did not provide a chain of custody for the ballots as required by A.R.S. 16-621(E). Approximately 2,500 duplicated ballots did not contain a discernible serial number, violating A.R.S. 16-621(A). There were also laws violated with duplicate ballots, accepting ballots that were not signed, and voters who were ineligible casting ballots.

Fann ended the session saying she had turned over the evidence to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich. Brnovich issued a statement immediately in response, “I will take all necessary actions that are supported by the evidence and where I have legal authority. Arizonans deserve to have their votes accurately counted and protected.”

Watch the full presentation:

sAAu6O33rNE

[Zamolxe]

OK, watched it.

So basically they are making vague statements about 50k illegal votes, already debunked here:



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/uknews/fact-checking-the-maricopa-county-election-audit-37739-problematic-voters/vi-AAONl8e

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/09/24/rebutting-trumps-claims-about-fraud-arizona-point-by-point/



Also, they bring up another debunked 100% proven lie, that Biden had 1 in a quadrillion chance to win. So the whole show has 0 credibility.

I remembered discussing this before:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?112814-MASSIVE-FRAUD-Major-Lawsuits--update-all-foiled-so-far-&p=1402261&viewfull=1#post1402261

https://reason.com/volokh/2020/12/09/more-on-statistical-stupidity-at-scotus/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua5aOFi-DKs

It's 100% false, it's just maths. You cannot lie with maths.

Why did the White House press secretary push this lie multiple times on Fox News and other outlets?
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/dec/10/facebook-posts/texas-lawsuit-statistics-fraud-wisconsin-michigan/

Why did they have to lie?

Why did Trump and Giuliani and Sydney Powell and Lin Wood lie about the voting machines switching votes?

There have been thousands of posts on Avalon in the past months about the machines switching votes. Now that we know for sure it was all a lie, you're saying...
yes yes, forget that, look at these other theories!!

When will we stop diverting attention from a proven lie, to fresh new lies that we again have to prove?

We're talking about stealing the US elections, which would be the greatest fraud in the past decades.
Trump continually lied about something as important as that and tried to manipulate us into thinking the machines switched votes.

Why?




Because this was all just a shouting match. From his position of power he threw around all possible theories, hoping that something would stick. It was nothing but propaganda.

The phrase “A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth” is attributed to the Nazi propagandist, Joseph Goebbels.

It was all a grift. You have been conned.

[Bill Ryan]

Folks, it's not over yet. :) (Not at all)

https://infowars.com/posts/texas-announces-election-audit-in-four-counties-democrats-melt-down

Texas Announces Election Audit in Four Counties — Democrats Melt Down

[samildamach]

So person X lost by 20 votes. Then, an audit occurs and 35 votes are proven to be un-auditable, and may be proven fraudulent.

What do you do with that election?


That's not my point, it would be a different discussion.

My point was that the audit proved the machines were not hacked and that they didn't switch votes.

But Trump has been claiming this for the past 10 months.

You did not watch the hearing. The opposite is actually true. They searched the unallocated space on the hard drive and found thousands of web searches on a machine that legally was supposed to remain air gapped. While that does not prove that the machine was "hacked", does that not raise your suspicion that it could have been? This is on a network that was never, ever supposed to be connected to the internet.

The machine counted the votes correctly.

What difference would it make if it was connected or not to the internet?

Its sole purpose is to count votes. The sole purpose of this election was to count the votes. The machine did that perfectly.
Trump said that the machine moved votes from Trump to Biden. It has been proven to be a lie.

Why would I even care if it was hacked or not, if the hackers did not change the results?

(And why would I believe any of these claims - hard drives, internet connectivity, etc. - made by the persons that have been claiming for the past months that the machines switched votes - which we now know was a complete lie)

you said what difference would it make if it was connected to the internet and just brushed it of like it doesn't matter.
Everything it means they broke the law, they lied,they had access to delete and change files,connected to the internet means anybody could gain access from anywhere.
This alone this one fact brings down the audit as unsafe.

[BoR]

I’m just reading this thread: conclusion: thousands and thousands of ballots were corrupted/false, evidence suggests there may have been tampering with the machines by ways of the internet connectivity combined with outdated and leaky security, but we can’t determine that, because log files were illegally and purposefully deleted before the audit. Reaction of some people: “so how does this prove election fraud?”. Am I really reading this? Yes, I am.

[TomKat]

Okay, well first off in calling for Arizona to decertify, full audits should be conducted nationwide in counties of like size and demographic, to see if these numbers (which are also in dispute) were indeed indicative of some funny business in just Maricopa county alone, or if this sort of thing is both common and systemic nationwide. This I believe would be the truly objective way of looking at it anyway, not just through the eyes of those already yearning for a certain result one way or another. Does that make sense?

If you're before a court of law, do you want the jury's minds already made up even before the proceedings begin?

And second, speaking of objectivity, or lack thereof: The Gateway Pundit is a highly partisan outlet, and that would likely be the reason they left out the most important number of all, that Biden actually came away with more votes than he had to begin with.

That's the bottom line number Doug, the auditors themselves showed that Biden actually came away with more than 300 votes than he had before. It's over. But it's not over, in that the 2024 republican nomination is Trump's if he wants it, so in that respect it's not over. He'd likely beat any tired old retread the democrats choose to trot out next.

If Trump runs in 2024 it will be as a spoiler, just to make sure nobody else gets it. I doubt he really wants to be president.

[mountain_jim]

https://t.me/praying_medic/5428



Praying Medic
Thoughts On the Arizona Audit

Some people hoped that the AZ audit would provide evidence that hundreds of thousands of illegal votes were cast in the 2020 election. They expected to hear proof that Donald Trump won the election. The Arizona audit was never going to overturn the results of the national election. That wasn't the purpose of the audit.
If you're feeling disappointed, it's likely because you had unrealistic expectations.

The audit report delivered exactly what I had hoped for. The biggest takeaway was Ben Cotton's presentation of criminal conduct on behalf of those who operate Maricopa County's Dominion Election Management System. Cotton proved that the system connects to the internet, that it allows remote access, and that its anti-virus and security software has never been updated. Most importantly, Cotton provided evidence that the people running the system methodically and repeatedly deleted election data just prior to critical events that could have shown fraud.

Cotton's presentation was damning because Dominion itself runs the election management system. According to former Maricopa County Recorder Adrian Fontes, Dominion has offices in the Maricopa County Election Center and the county employs two full time Dominion contractors who manage the system. If Dominion manages the system, they will likely be the ones facing criminal prosecution.

The evidence presented yesterday should cause any county that uses Dominion Voting Systems to consider auditing their election. The fact that Cotton provided evidence of criminal conduct was icing on the cake.

An hour before the report was released, AG Brnovich issued a statement saying, “I will take all necessary actions that are supported by the evidence and where I have legal authority."

Brnovich has sufficient motive to prosecute those who broke the law. States that use Dominion systems now have an uphill battle if they intend to argue that an audit is unnecessary.





I agree with this comment in Neon Revolt's Gab



@NeonRevolt When will they show the electronic vote tampering? Thats the seismic shift needed. Showing 57k fraudulent ballots doesn’t cause an earthquake. Even if it’s more than the margin of victory. To open the door to positive revolution we need the electronic vote tampering operation exposed. When this is done it will call into question every election we’ve ever had using machines. That is what will wake the masses. 57K ballots doesn’t do it.

[mojo]

That was great post by Praying Medic thanks...

[Cognitive Dissident]

I’m just reading this thread: conclusion: thousands and thousands of ballots were corrupted/false, evidence suggests there may have been tampering with the machines by ways of the internet connectivity combined with outdated and leaky security, but we can’t determine that, because log files were illegally and purposefully deleted before the audit. Reaction of some people: “so how does this prove election fraud?”. Am I really reading this? Yes, I am.

Denial - ain't just a river in Egypt

[Gracy]

https://t.me/praying_medic/5428



Praying Medic
Thoughts On the Arizona Audit

Some people hoped that the AZ audit would provide evidence that hundreds of thousands of illegal votes were cast in the 2020 election. They expected to hear proof that Donald Trump won the election. The Arizona audit was never going to overturn the results of the national election. That wasn't the purpose of the audit.
If you're feeling disappointed, it's likely because you had unrealistic expectations.

The audit report delivered exactly what I had hoped for. The biggest takeaway was Ben Cotton's presentation of criminal conduct on behalf of those who operate Maricopa County's Dominion Election Management System. Cotton proved that the system connects to the internet, that it allows remote access, and that its anti-virus and security software has never been updated. Most importantly, Cotton provided evidence that the people running the system methodically and repeatedly deleted election data just prior to critical events that could have shown fraud.[/B]

It seems a good idea in some instances, to preface certain posts with a mod hat off disclaimer.

So let me make it official, mod hat off :)

Anyone who thinks my analysis is dead wrong, ridiculous, or fill in the blank, then by all means do please lay out exactly why that is as you would with any other member.

So, having gotten that out of the way, this is what struck me about Praying Medic's analysis above. His quotes I've edited down to just the first two paragraphs as the rest would be unneeded repetition.

There's a lot of goal post moving, and stringing along happening on this general subject, and I feel he's doing his part at it right here. The following 2 sentences are the nitty gritty of it:


If you're feeling disappointed, it's likely because you had unrealistic expectations.

The audit report delivered exactly what I had hoped for.

Are you kidding me Praying Medic? That's exactly what people were hoping for, the rest would have simply been the cherry on top of a hot fudge sundae! First Arizona decertifies, and then the rest will come following suit.

There's one case in particular that this is almost an exact duplicate of. Remember the run up to the 2018 mid term elections? The narrative was all about Trump's power base was going to be soundly assured after this, when the republicans easily retain bout the house, and the senate.

Well we all know what happened, the dems snuck up and took the house back (which is quite common with out of power parties in the mid terms). But the very next morning, the narrative switched to "it was always about the senate".

Except it wasn't! It was about both the house, and the senate, but because things didn't go as hoped, we're going to slightly alter the expectation, to fit the new circumstance. And IMO this is precisely what PM has done here.

Who here wasn't hoping for some long awaited good news, with a big Trump win in Arizona? Raise your hands.

What would he be saying had the audit come to the conclusion that Trump actually won Arizona, by say, 1,002 votes?

What he's expecting me to believe here, is had that happened, he would have come out and said something along the lines of "well, yes Trump actually won, and that's great news and all, but our main focus needs to remain on all of these other matters".

[thepainterdoug]

Add to the Arizona Maricopa audit, let's not forget that although it wasnt packaged up tidy and edible for all, Mike Lindells presentation on the electronic end was very comprehensive. Im no expert and I understand people are not convinced from his previous presentation etc, but these two events in tandem will converge as things move forward. A case will be made and the audits will continue.
I have already stated that for me, my own intuition and gut instinct in reading the play, I already know and knew, Biden did not win this election.
Just doesn't wash.
So let's see where this goes.

[mojo]

Az perspective from Capt. Seth Kesshel.

https://rumble.com/vmyp0f-captain-seth-keshel-on-the-arizona-forensic-audit-in-maricopa-county.html

vkcivp

[thepainterdoug]

Thanks Mojo

this presentation cleans up this discussion pretty well. on we go.

[ExomatrixTV]

1441932113717051394


source (https://twitter.com/ElectionWiz/status/1441932113717051394)

[TomKat]

https://t.me/praying_medic/5428



Praying Medic
Thoughts On the Arizona Audit

Some people hoped that the AZ audit would provide evidence that hundreds of thousands of illegal votes were cast in the 2020 election. They expected to hear proof that Donald Trump won the election. The Arizona audit was never going to overturn the results of the national election. That wasn't the purpose of the audit.
If you're feeling disappointed, it's likely because you had unrealistic expectations.

The audit report delivered exactly what I had hoped for. The biggest takeaway was Ben Cotton's presentation of criminal conduct on behalf of those who operate Maricopa County's Dominion Election Management System. Cotton proved that the system connects to the internet, that it allows remote access, and that its anti-virus and security software has never been updated. Most importantly, Cotton provided evidence that the people running the system methodically and repeatedly deleted election data just prior to critical events that could have shown fraud.

Cotton's presentation was damning because Dominion itself runs the election management system. According to former Maricopa County Recorder Adrian Fontes, Dominion has offices in the Maricopa County Election Center and the county employs two full time Dominion contractors who manage the system. If Dominion manages the system, they will likely be the ones facing criminal prosecution.

.[/B]


If that was all proved, then how can they get away with saying that Biden won?

[Chris Gilbert]

Even though he's gotten prone to angry tirades more over the years I still look at Karl Denninger's blog from time to time as he does make some good points. Yesterday I was reading his analysis of the audit. Leaving aside the question of whether Trump or Biden are good leaders, it does sound like, even if fraud can't yet be proved in an explicit legal sense, there is still enough there to cast suspicion on the whole thing. The media and the left side of the spectrum are kidding themselves if they think this is going away, quite likely it will come back to bite them HARD in 2022 and 2024.

On Maricopa... (https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243697)


On Maricopa...
[Comments enabled]

What did we learn Friday?

1. Maricopa claimed there were no duplicate mail-in ballots. In fact there were far more duplicates than those required to change the outcome in the Presidential race. That has now been established. Either (1) Maricopa lied but actually de-duplicated the ballots (meaning the results stand) or Maricopa did not de-duplicate the mail-in envelopes and the results are impossible to validate because some 17,000 duplicate votes were cast.

2. Maricopa lied about their election management system never being connected to the Internet. It has been conclusively and forensically established that indeed it was. When it was is immaterial; the lie, standing alone, is enough.

3. Maricopa intentionally violated federal law in the maintenance of electronic records specifically including the chain of custody by not issuing individual login credentials to the authorized users for each function. This is a direct violation of federal law and it was an intentional act. These are laws, not suggestions.

4. One or more people intentionally destroyed security logs. At least one such person has been positively identified. That is a criminal act, standing alone, and must be prosecuted.

5. The databases were intentionally destroyed by one or more persons. The person who did #4 either conspired with said person(s) who destroyed the databases, was the person who did so, or did so to cover up the act without knowing who committed the first act. Whatever the facts on that linkage may be it was a deliberate, criminal act standing alone and must be prosecuted.

6. The so-called "auditors" hired by Maricopa are criminally incompetent or even worse, actively involved in the above. They must be named and prosecuted. Specifically, they failed to inspect the unallocated disk space on the EMS, a basic part of forensics as criminals often delete evidence of their activity. Said material was still there, so had the "auditors" hired by Maricopa been competent they would have discovered it.

What was not proved was that Trump won. But what was proved was that there is no honest assertion that can be made that either of the two Presidential candidates in serious contention won. The margin of victory is within the margin of dispute and it has been proved that electronic records critical to validate what occurred throughout the election process were deliberately destroyed by persons(s) who had physical access to the systems in question, with at least one such person being allegedly identified by security camera footage.

There may well be more here -- but what's been discovered thus far and proved (and for which the evidence is now in the public domain) shows that:

1. The election in Maricopa County for federal offices, including President, was not conducted in accordance with Federal Law.

2. The results, based solely on the count of duplicated ballot envelopes (people who voted more than once), which exceeds the margin of victory for the Presidential Office, are not able to be confirmed since once duplicate ballots are removed from the envelopes it is impossible to identify them. Maricopa county claimed no such duplicates exist. We now know more than 17,000 in fact do exist and the envelopes still exist. What we cannot prove one way or another is whether the ballots inside those envelopes were counted and, if only one was counted, which one was counted. We thus have no way to know who won.

3. The persons running the election have made materially false statements on an intentional basis about the equipment never being connected to the Internet.

4. The persons running the election both deliberately destroyed data related to the election in direct violation of Federal Law and, as a separate and distinct offense, attempted to cover up that destruction and identification of the person who did so. This act, standing alone, demonstrates intent to tamper with the election results.

5. The vast majority of said deliberately destroyed data was not recoverable and likely is not recoverable.

By forensic evidence, not presented and unrebutted, the outcome of the election in Arizona was falsely certified.

What's the remedy for this?

That's a separate debate -- but that this one county alone did in fact corrupt their election, did so intentionally, and did so in such a fashion that at this time it not possible to know what the result actually was is not subject to reasonable dispute.

Finally, not only was their forensic computer person credible he displayed exactly the process that I, as a person skilled in the art and who has performed computer forensics, would utilize. I found no fault in his procedures, his process and analysis. Not did I find him to make a single unproved assertion of fact. This is exactly what a professional is supposed to do in this field.

[mountain_jim]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/086/148/631/original/40c0c70d023bd4ed.png

[ExomatrixTV]

Why the Arizona Audit Changes Everything!

Cst1btc8gbA

[Zamolxe]

Even though he's gotten prone to angry tirades more over the years I still look at Karl Denninger's blog from time to time as he does make some good points. Yesterday I was reading his analysis of the audit. Leaving aside the question of whether Trump or Biden are good leaders, it does sound like, even if fraud can't yet be proved in an explicit legal sense, there is still enough there to cast suspicion on the whole thing. The media and the left side of the spectrum are kidding themselves if they think this is going away, quite likely it will come back to bite them HARD in 2022 and 2024.

On Maricopa... (https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243697)




1. Maricopa claimed there were no duplicate mail-in ballots. In fact there were far more duplicates than those required to change the outcome in the Presidential race. That has now been established. Either (1) Maricopa lied but actually de-duplicated the ballots (meaning the results stand) or Maricopa did not de-duplicate the mail-in envelopes and the results are impossible to validate because some 17,000 duplicate votes were cast.

https://eu.statesman.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/29/did-maricopa-county-arizona-audit-find-17-000-duplicate-votes/5902985001/

"Here’s why the county had these duplicate images on file:

Sometimes election workers receive a ballot envelope with a signature that raises questions. For example, it could have a blank signature line, or a signature that doesn’t closely resemble the one the county has on file. In this case, election workers are required by law to take a photo of this original, unopened envelope and then contact the voter who cast it to get a new signature. If the voter provides a valid signature, the county takes another image of the envelope. Only one vote is counted."
"This is factually inaccurate. The highly contested audit found 17,000 images of "duplicate" ballot envelopes.

Duplicate ballot envelopes are created when election officials contact voters with inconsistent or blank signatures to cure their signatures. "


When someone reads the conclusion at point 1 and doesn't do any fact checking or follow up, they will believe the audit found 17k duplicate votes. The audit clearly states that there were 17k duplicate envelope IMAGES.

The conclusion at point 1. is highly manipulative and deceiving disinformation.




2. Maricopa lied about their election management system never being connected to the Internet. It has been conclusively and forensically established that indeed it was. When it was is immaterial; the lie, standing alone, is enough.

https://www.azmirror.com/2021/09/24/arizona-audit-a-multitude-of-unsubstantiated-claims-and-no-proof-of-fraud/

"The county said its tabulation equipment was never connected to the internet and that Cotton’s claims were misleading. One of the machines Cotton cited was connected to the internet because it’s the server for the Recorder’s Office, the county tweeted, adding, “This is not the election system. We shouldn’t have to explain this.”"

When someone reads the conclusion at point 2 and doesn't do any fact checking or follow up, they will believe the audit found that the voting machines were connected to the internet. The audit clearly states that other equipment was connected to the internet, not the voting machines. This seems to be normal practice.

The conclusion at point 2. is highly manipulative and deceiving disinformation.




4. One or more people intentionally destroyed security logs. At least one such person has been positively identified. That is a criminal act, standing alone, and must be prosecuted.

https://www.azmirror.com/2021/09/24/arizona-audit-a-multitude-of-unsubstantiated-claims-and-no-proof-of-fraud/

“Nothing was purged. Cyber Ninjas don’t understand the business of elections. We can’t keep everything on the EMS (Election Management System) server because it has storage limits,” the county said.

And the county said none of its employees have intentionally deleted any data, and that any claims that they “were intentionally overriding logs is disingenuous. This is part of normal Windows configuration.”

Anybody with any technical background would understand that this is standard practice. Log files grow continuously and will eventually consume all the available disk space on the system. They get rotated and backed up on a remote log server. Rotating them means that they are deleted periodically on the source host (after the backup).


The conclusion at point 4. is highly manipulative and deceiving disinformation.




5. The databases were intentionally destroyed by one or more persons. The person who did #4 either conspired with said person(s) who destroyed the databases, was the person who did so, or did so to cover up the act without knowing who committed the first act. Whatever the facts on that linkage may be it was a deliberate, criminal act standing alone and must be prosecuted.

https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/was-the-maricopa-county-database

The county further explained that “data archival procedures” are standard practice because “[T]he Election Management System (EMS) database does not store election information forever.” Servers, the county explained, have “space limitations,” so files are archived, but not deleted.

As with point 4., the same applies to point 5. The databases are backed up.

The conclusion at point 5. is highly manipulative and deceiving disinformation.



The article is an example of disinformation and was written with clear intent to deceive the reader.
The fact that these authors still have an audience when it has been proven that they are purveyors of disinformation is truly mindboggling.

[ExomatrixTV]

Master Propagandist John Oliver LIES About The ARIZONA AUDIT!

04K589_zBZg

[ExomatrixTV]

New Declaration of Independence

1441562317687181314


source (https://twitter.com/NationalFile/status/1441562317687181314)

“This is Our New Declaration of Independence (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/new-declaration-independence-wendy-rogers-unveils-letter-signed-41-state-legislators-15-states-calling-nationwide-audit-decertification/)” – Wendy Rogers Unveils Letter Signed by 41 State Legislators From 15 States Calling For a Nationwide Audit and Decertification

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot_20210924-205039_Twitter-913x479.jpg


source (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/new-declaration-independence-wendy-rogers-unveils-letter-signed-41-state-legislators-15-states-calling-nationwide-audit-decertification/)

The results of Arizona’s historic audit show numerous discrepancies that were found in the audit. Here are just some of the findings:


Canvass showed over 3,400 more ballots were cast than recorded
Over 9,000 more mail-in ballots were received and recorded than the official number of mail-in ballots sent out by the county
Precincts show more ballots cast on election day than people who showed up to vote. 1,551 extra votes.
Approximately 2,500 ballots were shown in the early vote returns that do not have a voter listed as casting them.
Over 255,000 early votes shown in the county final vote file do not have a corresponding entry in the early voting returns file
Over 23,000 voted by mail after moving after the October 5th cutoff
2,382 voters cast votes in Maricopa county, in person, after moving out of the county
Over 2,000 voters who moved out of Arizona during the 29 days before the election were given a full ballot instead of a presidential-only ballot.
Close to 300 deceased voters potentially vote.
There is an unprecedented number of discrepancies in the vote total. This could only happen through malicious actions or severe incompetence from Maricopa county officials.

Even without listing all of the issues that were uncovered, there were still too many discrepancies to declare an outright winner of Arizona’s electoral votes.

Arizona MUST decertify.


source (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/new-declaration-independence-wendy-rogers-unveils-letter-signed-41-state-legislators-15-states-calling-nationwide-audit-decertification/)

1441558413637468160
source (https://twitter.com/WendyRogersAZ/status/1441558413637468160)


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FAFwsMPUYAIbjLP?format=png&name=4096x4096
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FAFwu2qWQAIWCo1?format=png&name=4096x4096

[ExomatrixTV]

It's Worse Than You Think: Kari Lake on What Really Happened in Arizona (https://rumble.com/v2a7fns-its-worse-than-you-think-kari-lake-on-what-really-happened-in-arizona-trigg.html)

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/i/0/T/o/i0Toi.gaa.1.rec.mp4


source (https://rumble.com/v2a7fns-its-worse-than-you-think-kari-lake-on-what-really-happened-in-arizona-trigg.html)

(starts around 34 minutes in the above video)

[TomKat]

Here's how the Arizona elections were rigged, supposedly:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dcJa66cjfec5/
Remember when B iden announced ahead of time that the votes would take days to count? Maybe everyone on the fentanyl pipeline knew what the cartel would do.

[ExomatrixTV]

Massive WIN For Kari Lake! This Is HUGE!

tlIqhqqw80o


Kari Lake (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Kari%20Lake) - [DS] Panic Mode, The Election Cheating Is Being Exposed, The People Know, Game Over

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/e/P/i/L/ePiLi.gaa.mp4

Kari Lake (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Kari%20Lake)begins the conversation discussing on how the election fraud was exposed. Each step of the way the people are seeing something they didn’t think existed. our elections are rigged. The cheaters who installed themselves in government are destroying the borders, the economy and our way of life. The people need to standup to these people and follow the rule of law to remove them. Kari’s case is headed to the Supreme Court, will the Supreme Court of Arizona follow the rule of law?
All source links to the report can be found on the x22report.com site.

The X22 Report (https://x22report.com) is "one man's opinion". Anything that is said on the report is either opinion, criticism, information or commentary, If making any type of investment or legal decision it would be wise to contact or consult a professional before making that decision. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence before making any significant investing decisions.


source (https://rumble.com/v2dpef8-kari-lake-ds-panic-mode-the-election-cheating-is-being-exposed-the-people-k.html)

[Satori]

So, the AZ trial court judge will go through the exercise the AZ Supreme Court says that it must, then the trial court judge will rule against Kari Lake. At least many more months will pass in this process.

Kari will appeal and many more months will pass.

If the AZSC takes the case again, Hobbs will have been “governor” for over a year, most likely. Then, having done what he AZSC told the judge to do, the AZSC will sustain the trial court and Hobbs will continue as the illegitimate governor of AZ.

This is in my view the probable outcome. There are many reasons why this is the probable outcome.

Of course, I could be wrong and I hope I am.

[thepainterdoug]

Its a kick the corruption con can down the road. buy time.
get it off the news cycle, then exhaustion for the public and on to the next

rinse, repeat

[ExomatrixTV]

Kari Lake Scores HUGE Lawsuit WIN!! Will Receive Ballots For Signature Verification AUDIT!:

_MoJNJ_O6xw

[onawah]

Huge Supreme Court Victory for Kari Lake
Dr. Steve Turley
1.09M subscribers
11,820 views
May 8, 2023

lHl14qsV8ow

[ExomatrixTV]

Kari Lake Bombshell Drops In Court!

vTAo4QFw4j8

[ExomatrixTV]

Kari Lake Press Conference, BIG Announcement!
v2mytrs/?pub=ir01b

[ExomatrixTV]

Katie Hobbs PANICS as Judge Makes HUGE RULING on AZ Election!:

ZkjkKOLDkS0


Massive Win: Judge RULES Arizona's Rigged Vote-Counting ILLEGAL | Kari Lake READY For A REMATCH:

uqcN4fhORGM
Finally a win in the fight for election integrity. When will we have fair elections again?

[norman]

The Roseanne Barr Podcast - 015 - Kari Lake (https://podbay.fm/p/the-roseanne-barr-podcast/e/1695279600)
1 hour 42 minutes - Posted Sep 21, 2023

SHOW NOTES
This week two strong and resilient women sit together in this powerful episode. Roseanne sits down with the rightful Governor of Arizona, Kari Lake! Kari is one of the most free-spoken fiercest defenders of America and the two women discuss motherhood, election fraud and how Americans can beat the globalist agenda that is killing us all.

https://pdst.fm/e/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/50d8ff25-862c-4954-9694-119055d0dfe2/karilakeaiff.mp3?dest-id=4024758

Video version:

https://rumble.com/v3jh4ts-015-kari-lake-the-roseanne-barr-podcast.html

v3gvqpk/?pub=1yatds

[norman]

https://twitter.com/sebgorka/status/1707241576978653246


BREAKING

Katie Hobbs has stood down as Governor?

Temporarily?

What the heck is going on in Arizona??



1707241576978653246

[norman]

https://t.me/HammerTimeQNews/19485
HammerTimeQNews/19485

[thepainterdoug]

wait. did she go to the Fetterman house of makeovers?

[Satori]

This is very odd.

A state governor, legitimately elected or not, only voluntarily yields authority to the next in line when the governor is under some form of disability. The disability can be a physical and/or mental disability, or a legal disability, such as being unable to properly and timely attend to the duties of the office. An example could occur when the governor is out of the state or country. Another example would be when the governor is incommunicado. That is, unable to communicate.

What makes it even more odd is the timeframe and the short duration. Essentially the evening through very early morning hours.

I suspect she was unable to communicate outside of the confines of where she was located and then only with those who were with her.

Was last night the full moon?

[onawah]

For more insights into the crimes in Arizona and what they connect with, see:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120062-Forbidden-Knowledge-News-Compilations&p=1579564&viewfull=1#post1579564