The Queen Has Died

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

There's been some chatter about this across the interwebs. The Queen has failed to make a series of public engagements lately, and speculation is intensifying as to the status of her health.

Could 2022 spell the end of She Who Reigns Over Us? Are they trying to keep her alive just long enough to make her diamond jubilee next summer - go out with a bang, trumpets blaring? What if she kicks the bucket too soon? Maybe they'll keep her on ice and announce it at the 'right time'. When is the right time to declare one's sovereign dead?

Onawah posted an article about this here, which is worth a read:

Elizabeth Will Die Soon And Then We’ll Have A “King” And It Will Be Hilarious
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
AUTHOR: CAITLIN JOHNSTONE

https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2021/11/15/elizabeth-will-die-soon-and-then-well-have-a-king-and-it-will-be-hilarious/

https://caitlinjohnstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/medium-2-1200x713.jpeg

***
Make no mistake though, the demise of QE will be a massive, seismic event across the entire world. Don't doubt official plans are already in place for how the media will handle this, what the government will do, and exactly how the transition of 'power' will be carried out.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=47910&d=1637072221

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=47909&d=1637072221

The Royal family have never been less relevant in the minds of the public, and their image never quite so low. I really do wonder how the world will react when the inevitable occurs. How will the installation of King Charles III be greeted? - or will it be George VII, or Henry IX? (he's free to choose his own title).

Will a pro-republic movement rise up in the UK?

Possibly interesting times ahead.

[Brigantia]

Coincidentally I posted earlier today here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?3339-Earth-People-Government&p=1463603&viewfull=1#post1463603) (though there's been no reaction to it) about what I perceive that the royals have done to ensure continuity of rule.

I do think that a lot of Brits have fallen for this soap opera, Meghan's arrival on the scene was no random event.

[mizo]

Lots of recent conjecture that her maj has recently popped her clogs, some images on the media suggest lookalikes are now being deployed...

47912


47911

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Coincidentally I posted earlier today here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?3339-Earth-People-Government&p=1463603&viewfull=1#post1463603) (though there's been no reaction to it) about what I perceive that the royals have done to ensure continuity of rule.

Thanks, I didn't see that. I believe you're right, "they" will do anything, absolutely anything, to keep their hold on power over us peasants. With the media in their pocket, every trick in the book will be employed to ensure their survival. Playing on the public's sense of national identity, spinning stories in their favour... whatever it takes "they" will do. Even - God forbid it - a well-placed false flag that elicits the public's sympathy somehow, or shows the Royals off in a good light.

And who are "they"?

Who indeed.

Who but a Rothschild gets away with finger-poking the future King?

47913

[Eric J (Viking)]

I read this the other day...hmmmm perhaps there’s something in the air.

The death of Queen Elizabeth will be one of the most disruptive events in Britain in the past 70 years – November 14, 2021

Queen Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of this Realm and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, is not going to live forever.

Since ascending to the throne in 1952, the monarch has seen 13 prime ministers serve Britain and lived through another 13 US presidents. She’s now 92. At some point — not for many years yet, we hope — Queen Elizabeth II’s reign will come to an end.

But what happens then?

For at least 12 days — between her passing, the funeral and beyond — Britain will grind to a halt. The chaos will cost the UK economy billions in lost earnings. The stock markets and banks are likely to close. And both the funeral and the subsequent coronation will become formal national holidays, each with an estimated economic hit to gross domestic product of £1.2 billion to £6 billion ($1.6 billion to $7.9 billion), to say nothing of organisational costs.

But to focus on the financial disruption doesn’t begin to describe the sheer magnitude of the queen’s death. It will be an event unlike anything Britain has seen since the end of World War II.

There will be trivial disruptions — the BBC will cancel all comedy shows, for example — and jarring cultural changes. Prince Charles may change his name, and the words of the national anthem will be changed too. The British Commonwealth might even unravel completely.

The deaths of Princess Diana and the queen mother both brought on waves of public mourning and hysteria. But that of Queen Elizabeth II, due to her longevity and fundamental place atop British society, will be on a whole new level.

Most British people have simply never known life without the queen.

It will be a strange, uncertain time.

The queen has been around for a long, long time — living through the rule of everyone from Adolf Hitler to John F. Kennedy.

In the hours after the queen’s death, much will depend on the manner of her passing.

More here..

https://roserambles.org/2021/11/14/the-death-of-queen-elizabeth-will-be-one-of-the-most-disruptive-events-in-britain-in-the-past-70-years-november-14-2021/

[Journeyman]

I try not to pay attention to this particular soap opera and when this occurs I'm going to do my level best not to put out any energy into it to be harvested, but three predictions.

I think the Queen will die, or be said to have died, on a date with ritual significance. I know considering her age it gets ever more likely but I suspect when it does happen or is said to have happened it will turn out that the stars, gematria etc are in some way marking it out. I think it will be a part of this world event we're experiencing now. Whatever that is.

I suspect that her death will be used to achieve a variety of changes in various commonwealth countries, constitutional, geo-political etc. I think this event will have massive resonance due to the length of the reign and the ubiquity of Elizabeth Windsor's image. This person links to so many eras, world events. The death will appear in part as a death of the old world and I think in some form or another it's been planned or foreordained as a part of a change event in human history.
This will be presented as a natural point at which to change course/make new links etc. The remnants of the previous power structure will be swept away.

There will be some form of scandal or incident that will propel a call for the throne to skip Charles and move to William. Perhaps blow back from Epstein and Andrew connections or something related Not saying this will happen, but it will be a thing for as long as the scripting requires it to be.

[Gracy]

For most Americans who just don't get the public fixation with a monarch, and I'm certainly in that boat, this is a way I've found to at least get a taste of Great Britain's insatiable taste for all things royal: simply take a gander at how many of us tend to view our presidents over the years.

They truly can be our version of royalty. When we really take a shining to one, we can't get enough of all things about them.

Then on down the chain of succession, the drama and intrigue... same as the royal bloods. Who's next in line? A prince/princess or a vice president. And comparable to the royal family, would be the president's family, his/her cabinet, and top of the pecking order senators and congressman.

Hopefully this is not straying off the subject Star Mariner, thought the comparison might help Americans and others who scratch their heads at royal drama and intrigue, as if it's something totally foreign to the way we do things.

It's really not that much of a foreign concept at all, more like in the realms of same thing just different.

[Brigantia]

For most Americans who just don't get the public fixation with a monarch, and I'm certainly in that boat, this is a way I've found to at least get a taste of Great Britain's insatiable taste for all things royal: simply take a gander at how many of us tend to view our presidents over the years.

That's a good analogy Gracy, though I'd say that we're a lot less fixated about the royals than you may think. Having been in the US a few times and experienced your culture, I'd say that it was generally more star-struck than we are. Also, across the Channel in the European continent, they seem to be far more interested in our royals than we are, even though they got rid of theirs and are now mostly republics!

Take the Queen's speech on Christmas Day; 8.2 million watched it last Christmas, compared with 28 million in 1980. Gone are the days when everyone watched it and I remember my father saying that he got a clout across the head from his dad for talking whilst the King's speech was on the radio.

To escape Prince William's wedding, we went to Avebury for a long walk as we thought it would be quiet and seeing as the good thing about the wedding was a day off work. We were wrong - many had the same idea and there were many other walkers and cyclists escaping the show for the masses.

Many here are indifferent to the royals. When they went out to meet the ordinary folk, they used to be greeted with bows and curtseys but you rarely see that anymore. What really gets a lot of us interested is a good royal scandal.

[Journeyman]

Just on the question of how many here are still under the glamour of the royals...

I think the jumbled family life, scandals, affairs etc are all a part of the product.

Netflix have spent the past 5? Or so years producing a very glossy, big budget show called 'The Crown', telling in effect the life story of Elizabeth Windsor and family.

I think this will have reached many, both within and outside the that would otherwise be nonplussed by this. I wonder if there's some intent in this or if it's just an accident of fate?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

For most Americans who just don't get the public fixation with a monarch,

If you want the truth, we're not at all fixated, not one tiny bit. I suspect the rest of the world has been indoctrinated to believe otherwise. But that's been artificially generated by carefully controlled media driven perception management.

On the street, in the cities, towns and villages, the vast majority of the British everyman/woman give almost zero s***ts about them. Zero. Unless perhaps you're very old, or just very old fashioned. The majority of Brits probably wouldn't even give a damn if the Royal family disappeared off the face of the earth tomorrow. That's what I know and can tell from personal experience. Because they are not us. They do not represent us, and serve no useful purpose to anyone, not really. As much the media keep trying to prop them up and sing their praises, many are beginning to wake up to another reality.

It was a bit different 20 or 30 years ago. Princess Diana was universally admired, and by many loved. She was the JFK of the UK in many ways. She brought a human touch to the ruling elite, and she had a connection (unlike the others) with the common people. Having married into that clan she was not one them, that was very clear. She actually gave a damn. And like JFK she paid the ultimate price for it.

Did they take her out? IMO, yes. And does Charles have blood on his hands? Yes to that, too.

Even to the norms, Charles is the butt of many jokes. The truly aware may have much more sinister anecdotes to tell of the next-in-line. Because let's not forget, his BFF was one Jimmy SaVILE.

47914

And how close were they? About as close as Prince Andrew and Jeffery Epstein. Now isn't that a coincidence?

You can tell an awful lot about a person by the company he keeps.

[cursichella1]

One of the remote viewers on Cryptoviewing (https://cryptoviewing.com/) did a session whereby he described a royal transfer of power happening this month. It was a trip because he described seeing an ACTUAL transfer of power, if that makes sense. I can't remember if it was Dick Allgire or Edward Riordan but I'm leaning towards Dick. It was on their Patreon page so I'll look and clarify here if I can find it.

[gord]

One of the remote viewers on Cryptoviewing (https://cryptoviewing.com/) did a session whereby he described a royal transfer of power happening this month. It was a trip because he described seeing an ACTUAL transfer of power, if that makes sense. I can't remember if it was Dick Allgire or Edward Riordan but I'm leaning towards Dick. It was on their Patreon page so I'll look and clarify here if I can find it.

It was Allgire in this month's world events.

[Journeyman]

One of the remote viewers on Cryptoviewing (https://cryptoviewing.com/) did a session whereby he described a royal transfer of power happening this month. It was a trip because he described seeing an ACTUAL transfer of power, if that makes sense. I can't remember if it was Dick Allgire or Edward Riordan but I'm leaning towards Dick. It was on their Patreon page so I'll look and clarify here if I can find it.




It was Allgire in this month's world events.

Interesting, never come across this site before - what's their success rate?

[Matthew]

"They've gone on a long, long holiday" is satire for "I murdered them". Experts say we won't see the queen until February. February is going to be busy; Austria enforces mandatory jabs on the Feb 1st, possibly because everyone is seasonally demoralised because of Winter, but I wonder if it's because Feb the 2nd is an occult sacrifice day. Thinking aloud


Queen has 'entered a new phase' and we 'may not see her until February', say experts
Her Majesty is unlikely to be seen in public for the rest of the year, according to royal experts
By Kirsten Jones, Features & Lifestyle Writer
12:00, 16 NOV 2021UPDATED15:41, 16 NOV 2021
https://www.ok.co.uk/lifestyle/queen-new-phase-wont-see-25469451
Since her hospital scare in October, Her Majesty the Queen has been under strict orders from doctors to take it easy.

And according to insiders, she may not be seen in public until next year.

The Queen’s diary of public engagements has been mostly wiped for the remainder of 2021 as royal experts say she’s ‘entered a new phase’.

Joe Little, managing editor of Majesty magazine, told the Express: “I don’t think we will see her out and about doing anything officially, even if she recovers from the sprained back.”

Our 95-year-old monarch was forced to cancel her annual appearance at the Cenotaph for Remembrance Sunday due to her injury, with Prince Charles stepping up to lay a wreath on her behalf.


...

[Sérénité]

“The Queen has entered a new phase...” ?!

...As in a ‘non mortal’ phase?

[Dumpster Diver]

Life Force’s “Live@5” reports that the Queen has died.

[mizo]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59368620

47958


Queens Image looks a bit suspect...

[Brigantia]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59368620

47958


Queens Image looks a bit suspect...

Agreed; not her. Is that the best they can do for a double?

I've just taken a quick check on other photos of her - the shape of the ear is wrong.

[Journeyman]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59368620

47958


Queens Image looks a bit suspect...

The clue is in the headline:

Queen attends royal double christening at Windsor

[Cognitive Dissident]

Very interesting insight from Cryptoviewing. On the astrology front, I haven't done a deep dive but I think the series of Scorpio-Taurus eclipses (which have just started) will have a major effect on her as well as Charles:

https://www.purewow.com/news/royal-family-total-lunar-eclipse

https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/taurus-scorpio-eclipse-series

Given how loved the Queen is in the UK and how nobody likes Charles, I think the structure of the monarchy will be in question. And also a lot of secrets will probably come out, starting with the fairly obvious facts that Andrew and Edward do not have Philip as their father (google Porchester and Plunket for clues on their actual parentage). This is unknown to many in the UK and will come as a big shock to most.

[RedX]

Coincidentally I posted earlier today here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?3339-Earth-People-Government&p=1463603&viewfull=1#post1463603) (though there's been no reaction to it) about what I perceive that the royals have done to ensure continuity of rule.

Thanks, I didn't see that. I believe you're right, "they" will do anything, absolutely anything, to keep their hold on power over us peasants. With the media in their pocket, every trick in the book will be employed to ensure their survival. Playing on the public's sense of national identity, spinning stories in their favour... whatever it takes "they" will do. Even - God forbid it - a well-placed false flag that elicits the public's sympathy somehow, or shows the Royals off in a good light.

And who are "they"?

Who indeed.

Who but a Rothschild gets away with finger-poking the future King?

47913

A well placed false flag indeed. I think Prince Andrew is about to have his number called.

[cursichella1]

One of the remote viewers on Cryptoviewing (https://cryptoviewing.com/) did a session whereby he described a royal transfer of power happening this month. It was a trip because he described seeing an ACTUAL transfer of power, if that makes sense. I can't remember if it was Dick Allgire or Edward Riordan but I'm leaning towards Dick. It was on their Patreon page so I'll look and clarify here if I can find it.




It was Allgire in this month's world events.

Interesting, never come across this site before - what's their success rate?

Excellent. I've been following Dick and Daz for years because of that. If only I'd been paying more attention during their initial foray into crypto coins...:ROFL:

[avid]

One of the remote viewers on Cryptoviewing (https://cryptoviewing.com/) did a session whereby he described a royal transfer of power happening this month. It was a trip because he described seeing an ACTUAL transfer of power, if that makes sense. I can't remember if it was Dick Allgire or Edward Riordan but I'm leaning towards Dick. It was on their Patreon page so I'll look and clarify here if I can find it.




It was Allgire in this month's world events.

Interesting, never come across this site before - what's their success rate?

Excellent. I've been following Dick and Daz for years because of that. If only I'd been paying more attention during their initial foray into crypto coins...:ROFL:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-54174794


Barbados has announced its intention to remove Queen Elizabeth as its head of state and become a republic.
"The time has come to fully leave our colonial past behind," the Caribbean island nation's government said.
It aims to complete the process in time for the 55th anniversary of independence from Britain, in November 2021.
A speech written by Prime Minister Mia Mottley said Barbadians wanted a Barbadian head of state.
"This is the ultimate statement of confidence in who we are and what we are capable of achieving," the speech read.
Buckingham Palace said that it was a matter for the government and people of Barbados.
A source at Buckingham Palace said that the idea "was not out of the blue" and "has been mooted and publicly talked about many times", BBC royal correspondent Jonny Dymond said.

[Sérénité]

She’s been spotted alive and well... :wink:

https://img.ifunny.co/images/b25966d818b0eff53f4eb921124a4fb606093a32a79a2a8cf454131b40b28dfe_1.jpg

[Brigantia]

∧∧∧
Funny meme but the picture's old - from 2019.

[Vicus]

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjx70wUrY3Hy3A3ajJQENfEb-iE-nz9Vt886QpSxFFt6WvtJ9I77TJKvtzND6vMMNiLm05DC08GtN4O_5Eyxg1bzBYz8YJSuzdt0gxKwspqMZlRqm5V3vDZV_1oDO05x NWneNebClGx6TocZJRSgv6ymRcA1CVkDlc9IE-vSGVOzlzHpX8InOVoYd5pCg=w400-h288

[Manasaki]

Many rumours - and they never get addressed. It comes up in many readings consistently, that the original body that once housed the white dragon is no more. Yet we must consider that the protocols are very concise, the Crown is what they represent. The Crown still exists. It is a collection of corporations listed in Companies House. And all assets reverted back to the Crown. I am not enough of an economist to expand further... but it seems fairly clear.

Watch the Opening of Parliament in 2010 and then watch the most recent opening of Parliament in 2021. I did much more than that, and watched many years worth (if you have the inclination it is quite illuminating) especially when you shut off sound and just observe form. The Crown is always brought in First. There is a stark difference between MPs leaving the HoC in 2010 and in 2021 - chilling almost - seems as if they are all under arrest - and I keep coming back to President Trump's visit which occurred beforehand... walking ahead of the Queen, looking so cock-a-hoop. Yeah, puts a bit of credit on the echo chambers where those rumours are discussed.

Needless to say, it doesn't seem to matter much to the Crown who stands behind it (the Crown ?? Dracos ?? Off Worlder Covenants we the public have been informed about through the medium of movies and fiction). What I think is that for public perception they've selected a look alike - and for whatever reason they're in no state to host the type of send off required - They have found someone a bit younger, moves faster, breathes better, smaller chest, younger voice - perfect accent, near perfect performance.

Other clues was when Boris prorogued parliament and got away with it, Big Ben looks more like a prison with electric fencing than it does like it's being renovated. And in the movie and music industry catalogues are being sold off for agents to manage, movies shifting from one place to another. There's a lot of business events happening to indicate things are moving around fast as cash is being raised for some reason (sealed indictments perhaps?)

Looking at the happenings around what this is, things like countries leaving the commonwealth, assets being sold and wound up, the dissolution of UK govt Ltd on companies house etc. (just the ones I have clocked, I am not at all knowledgeable in the specifics) But what it seems to me, is it has markings similar to the winding down of an estate. It reminds me of the time a contact of mine in the antipodes told me of rumours of Madiba's passing many months before it came to pass in officialdom. Conveniently in between that time the rumour began, and the official pronouncement was made, his estate was neatly administered.

Then factor in rumours about the Heir, and the Heir's Heir... following a theory to a logical conclusion, we might end up with Meghan as the People's Princess she always wanted to be, after all. The recent Ellen appearance, where we watch her take humiliating orders from Ellen (so surreal) And if you're especially observant you will pick up that we do not actually see any bottle when she takes the first sample ... which matches no colour red on the table ... and her demeanour changes slightly after that... I don't know if I was the only one to see it as some kind of a ritual performed for all to see. What was on the first Nacho?

Anyway I am relatively new here. I am a seeker of Truth and I am as limited by my echo chambers as everyone else.

[Matthew]

Not sure where to post this, it's only someone's conversational observations, high speculation for entertainment purposes only. I myself am entertaining the idea ;)

https://twitter.com/trutherbleuchef/status/1475087426641141764
Mr.B
@trutherbleuchef
My son has watched #TheQueensSpeech from the past 10 years.
He noticed this is the 1st year that there aren't any different camera angles or can see her hands.
Resembles the deep fake speech that channel 4 put out last year.
Was that a test run.
Who knows Thinking face

[Eric J (Viking)]

The Queen is under medical supervision at Balmoral after doctors became concerned for her health, Buckingham Palace has said.

It said in a statement: "Following further evaluation this morning, The Queen's doctors are concerned for Her Majesty's health and have recommended she remain under medical supervision.

"The Queen remains comfortable and at Balmoral."

Her hands look purple to me which is a sign of cyanosis…

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/queen-under-medical-supervision-as-doctors-are-concerned-for-her-health-12692805

Viking

[Journeyman]

Apologies if the following isn't considered in good taste. I have a different opinion to most on this.

Just like the Queen has an official and an actual birthday I believe the same thing goes for the day of their death. I don't know when the actual one will be, or has been as I don't discount her having died before now. There's been several odd aspects about her appearances in recent years.

I believe the official day will have some occult or astrological significance. Just like Phillip's did.

I also think that when London Bridge falls down it will kick off a series of other events worldwide. I think it will be a time of seismic changes, long in the planning.

Whilst being cognisant of the significance of the event I will be doing my best to avoid as much of the hagiographies and eulogising as possible. Media blackout will probably be the order of the day given anything I'm interested in will be cancelled in any case. Head down, hatches battened....

[9ideon]

Something seems up though.

4cW8FyckvJw

dbANxjGqWzc

[wondering]

I agree completely on your take of events, Journeyman.

[Inversion]

Apologies if the following isn't considered in good taste. I have a different opinion to most on this.

Just like the Queen has an official and an actual birthday I believe the same thing goes for the day of their death. I don't know when the actual one will be, or has been as I don't discount her having died before now. There's been several odd aspects about her appearances in recent years.

I believe the official day will have some occult or astrological significance. Just like Phillip's did.

I also think that when London Bridge falls down it will kick off a series of other events worldwide. I think it will be a time of seismic changes, long in the planning.

Whilst being cognisant of the significance of the event I will be doing my best to avoid as much of the hagiographies and eulogising as possible. Media blackout will probably be the order of the day given anything I'm interested in will be cancelled in any case. Head down, hatches battened....

In the past I've found it odd that her death was reported like a Mandela effect. I feel there's an event or series of events that'll transpire after she passes. The false stories could have been designed by a group to artificially push whatever is coming. I heard that when they reach an extreme age, they're relocated to divert attention from their questionable DNA. Her mother lived to 101 & Philip was 99. Henry Kissinger is 99 and may also fall into their DNA profile.

[Ravenlocke]

https://twitter.com/AZmilitary1/status/1567858092783685634
1567858092783685634

https://twitter.com/AZmilitary1/status/1567863936422125568
1567863936422125568

[Ravenlocke]

https://twitter.com/AZmilitary1/status/1567873976201773056
1567873976201773056

[Mare]

The tweet has now been deleted from Twitter, what was it?

[Ravenlocke]

The tweet has now been deleted from Twitter, what was it?

It was a tweet quoting the Guardian article saying the Queen had died but that it was not confirmed.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Hm yeh, something could really be up this time.

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1567894915878617090

-- Repost from page one: on the event of the Queen's death [alleged] --

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=47910&d=1637072221

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=47909&d=1637072221

[Inversion]

Balmoral Castle has an interesting history and covers 50,000 acres. There are fourteen stone cairns on the property. The Queen mum died at Royal Lodge (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Lodge) in 2002.

Balmoral Castle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balmoral_Castle)

Balmoral Castle (/bælˈmɒrəl/) is a large estate house in Aberdeenshire, Scotland, owned by Queen Elizabeth II. It is near the village of Crathie, 9 miles (14 km) west of Ballater and 50 miles (80 km) west of Aberdeen.[2]

Balmoral has been one of the residences of the British royal family since 1852, when the estate and its original castle were bought from the Farquharson family by Prince Albert, the husband of Queen Victoria.

Balmoral cairns (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balmoral_cairns)

The cairns commemorate members of the British royal family and events in their lives.[1] The majority of the cairns were erected by Queen Victoria.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/38/Cairn_for_Prince_Albert_Balmoral.JPG/1920px-Cairn_for_Prince_Albert_Balmoral.JPG

[scotslad]

Is it just me or is all the news in the UK talking as tho the queen has actually passed.

(as of 18:00 today, officially she hasnt)

The latest coverage in local paper online is all about that months of planning has been in place for when she passed!

Eee me.

Between whipping up a frenzy of wheeling out well wishers wishing her well, and the many tv presenters wearing black ties, it all sounding a tad morbid.

Even Biden is quoted as being very concerned about her.

Has she? Hasnt she? Will she? (hope not - come on girl ;) )

Let the game of thrones begin....Charles, William?

Interesting times for sure.

Just need Harry & Megan now to drop another "bomb" and hog the limelight and headlines.

What say you?

[Ravenlocke]

They are saying on our tv in the US that the queen has passed.

https://twitter.com/HISTORY/status/1567929250338197504
1567929250338197504

[Ratszinger]

The Queen died Thursday surrounded by her family in Scotland. It's popping all over the news now.

[Brigantia]

It's now been confirmed that she died this afternoon.

https://twitter.com/RoyalFamily/status/1567928275913121792

[Spiral]

She has died, it's official

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61585886

[scotslad]

aye now it official ;) alas poor lizzie we knew her well. A fond farewell

(tried to delete, mods feel free)

[Journeyman]

It's now been confirmed that she died this afternoon.

https://twitter.com/RoyalFamily/status/1567928275913121792

It's odd to read 'The King' and for it not to be a historical reference!

[Brigantia]

It's odd to read 'The King' and for it not to be a historical reference!

Indeed - but will it be Charles or William?

I wouldn't be surprised if he passes over the crown to his son.

[Gwin Ru]

...

... why did it take so long for them to announce it?

Queen Elizabeth II, Britain’s longest-reigning monarch, dies aged 96 (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/08/queen-elizabeth-ii-britains-longest-reigning-monarch-dies-aged-96?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other)

Buckingham Palace says monarch has died at Scottish residence of Balmoral Castle

Caroline Davies (https://www.theguardian.com/profile/carolinedavies)
Thu 8 Sep 2022 18.30 BST
Last modified on Thu 8 Sep 2022 18.59 BST

Queen Elizabeth II, the longest-reigning monarch in British history, has died at the age of 96.

Prince Charles, 73, heir to the throne since the age of three, is now king, and the Duchess of Cornwall is now Queen Consort.

In a statement, Buckingham Palace said: “The Queen died peacefully at Balmoral this afternoon. The King and the Queen Consort will remain at Balmoral this evening and will return to London tomorrow.”

The royal family’s official website carried the message: “Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022” along with the official statement issued by Buckingham Palace.

[...]


Full article: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/08/queen-elizabeth-ii-britains-longest-reigning-monarch-dies-aged-96?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

[seehas]

even with adrenochrome u dont live forever but wait henry kissinger is still alive

[Spiral]

It's odd to read 'The King' and for it not to be a historical reference!

Indeed - but will it be Charles or William?

I wouldn't be surprised if he passes over the crown to his son.

The thing is even if it is Charles, it might not be "King Charles", he can use any of his Christian names; - Charles, Philip, Arthur or George.

I don't think he'll go with Charles because of the beheading thing, and not Philip, that's French, and Arthur would be a bit silly, my money is on George.

[arwen]

It's odd to read 'The King' and for it not to be a historical reference!

Indeed - but will it be Charles or William?

I wouldn't be surprised if he passes over the crown to his son.




It will be Charles:


Her eldest son, Prince Charles, will now become King, while his eldest son, Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, assumes the position of heir to the throne.

Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/09/08/queen-elizabeth-ii-dies-royal-family-mourning-latest-news/

[wondering]

I recall several months ago, IIRC, the queen openly confirmed that Camilla would be queen consort...quite surprising at the time.

[arwen]

He is now King Charles III:


‘The death of my beloved Mother, Her Majesty The Queen, is a moment of the greatest sadness for me and all members of my family,’ said King Charles III in a statement.

---According to reports, Charles does not need a coronation ceremony to assume the throne. He also inherited Queen Elizabeth’s titles as defender of the faith and supreme governor of the Church of England and he is also the head of 14 Commonwealth countries.


Prince Charles, 73, becomes King after Queen Elizabeth’s death (https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/prince-charles-73-becomes-king-after-queen-elizabeths-death-breaking/)

[Spiral]

He will is now King Charles III:


‘The death of my beloved Mother, Her Majesty The Queen, is a moment of the greatest sadness for me and all members of my family,’ said King Charles III in a statement.


Prince Charles, 73, becomes King after Queen Elizabeth’s death (https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/prince-charles-73-becomes-king-after-queen-elizabeths-death-breaking/)

I suppose a change of name is a bit much in todays dumbed down world lol.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

I'm actually quite shocked. I thought they would let the speculation linger before any announcement was made - perhaps for a few days and even if she was already dead. But there you have it. It's official. I now expect this to dominate the news cycle for many days to come.

Love her or loathe her, or having no strong opinion, don't doubt this is a major, certainly year-defining event - if not world wide then certainly in this country. We are not a Republic, but a Monarchy, so this is a big deal. It's the end of an Era, if not an Epoch. Remember, when Queen Elizabeth came to the throne WWII had only been over for seven years. Winston Churchill was Prime Minister! The vast majority of us here weren't even born yet. She had one hell of a long reign. Some (certainly Charles) will say too long.

[Waldo]

My family immigrated to the new world in 1638 there is still a family home on the Themes River in the UK having said that................

Who cares if some shriveled up old lady in the UK dies? I never got this love affair with the Royal family they put on their under ware no differently than you or I do.

Good Riddance.

[Brigantia]

It's odd to read 'The King' and for it not to be a historical reference!

Indeed - but will it be Charles or William?

I wouldn't be surprised if he passes over the crown to his son.




It will be Charles:


Her eldest son, Prince Charles, will now become King, while his eldest son, Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, assumes the position of heir to the throne.

Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/09/08/queen-elizabeth-ii-dies-royal-family-mourning-latest-news/

It remains to be seen; he may take up the role out of duty, but he is 73 now and he's always seemed more comfortable as a country gent on his Highbury estate.

He also has quite a temper by all accounts, and the way Diana was treated still lingers in many peoples' minds.

William is a lot more popular, and a monarch is entitled to abdicate.

[Inversion]

She is the second longest serving monarch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest-reigning_monarchs) in history. Louis XIV served for 72 years 110 days. According to the Sumerian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumerian_King_List) King List En-men-lu-ana (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En-men-lu-ana) ruled for 43,200 years.

ABC live stream

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgvZN1Ud28s

[JackMcThorn]

I found it interesting that the media refers to the event as 'the queen dies' or buckingham palace refers to 'the queen dies peacefully'; as opposed to a more sophisticated 'passes, or passed away'. Even this very thread formerly mentioned 'she passed' and has been changed to 'died' 9 September 2o22.

As an ex-pat american with nearly 4 years here in Ireland this month I must admit that we in america knew little of england's history and democracy dating well into the early 17oos. I even heard in the middle 9o's that the royal family was not as influential as the typical U.K. government and it was described as the monarchy was on the 'back burner'. [Which I did not believe to be true.] Everything I learned in my upbringing was that england was america's first enemy and in this the modern era they are best friends. [Which I am cautious about.]

So I am not surprised, I expected her to pass this year. She seemed very fragile. I was surprised at some of the commentary that I was reading on PA that suggested she had already passed away some time before now and then this news to-day. It sort of makes me think differently regarding the suspicious nature of certain commentaries and how huge the news actually is when it really happens. Same as the time there was some commentary about a friend of PA that was suggested she was in a coma and for the most part she was okay but troubled.

A wait and see approach serves me best in those circumstances. The truth in due time.

[Bill Ryan]

This livestream has just started, and Alexander Mercouris opens with some wise and statesmanlike words that I think are very apt.

When Queen Elizabeth took the throne, in 1952 and before many reading this now were born, Winston Churchill was Prime Minister on the UK, Stalin was General Secretary of the USSR, and Eisenhower was about to become President of the US. She has been there, as a symbol that has now passed, of a Britain (in a world) that now no longer exists.

And in a modern Britain which is facing massive economic and [potentially] social and political crisis, the loss of the Queen will feel to some, even unconsciously, as another figurative central tent pole that has collapsed leaving them with a loss of identity and a loss of hope or any national meaning or pride.

Mercouris says it far better than I just did, but the whole issue of what this means for the identity of the country is an important one. It's not about the passing of one elderly woman, it's about the passing of a symbol, something that was always there, year in and year out, whatever happened anywhere, that in many ways had held Britain together in maybe more ways than many had ever been consciously aware of.

:flower:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3PXFA1xaCk

[ExomatrixTV]

Queen Elizabeth II dies aged 96:

Kv_in80qCro
I wonder if there will be any new revaluations/secrets coming to surface coming weeks ... that can shine a different light about who she really is and what she has done behind the scenes.

BPuS72Hqx5yL


"Queen Elizabeth (Was) Under Medical Supervision"

https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/K/9/K/H/K9KHf.gaa.rec.mp4


source (https://rumble.com/v1j6mp0-thursday-live-queen-elizabeth-under-medical-supervision-orange-man-bad-etc-.html)

[Did You See Them]

King Charles III will be a new kind of tent pole.

[ExomatrixTV]

2P0vONA3lCJT
gWuwgHBRBzyb
RaRHHIk3l29T
WdiGWShqi3kE
ltJNFYYppCDJ

[Brigantia]

I found it interesting that the media refers to the event as 'the queen dies' or buckingham palace refers to 'the queen dies peacefully'; as opposed to a more sophisticated 'passes, or passed away'. Even this very thread mentions 'she passed'. But I would expect a level of sophistication from PA members and writers.

From a British perspective; we tend to say "died" - it is what it is - and "passed' is an American euphemism to us and not sophisticated at all. However it is a euphemism that is gaining ground here unfortunately.

[ExomatrixTV]

Queen Elizabeth II Dead At 96

Royal Family issued statement saying "Queen died peacefully at Balmoral this afternoon."

(https://www.twitch.tv/banneddotvideo) Update (1331ET): The Royal Family has issued a statement (https://www.royal.uk/) that Queen Elizabeth II, Britain’s longest-serving monarch, died at 96.

“The Queen died peacefully at Balmoral this afternoon. The King and The Queen Consort will remain at Balmoral this evening and will return to London tomorrow,” The Royal Family said.

Earlier in the day, Buckingham Palace issued a rare statement that said the Queen was “under medical supervision” and doctors were “concerned” for her health.

At 96, she was Britain’s longest-serving monarch, stretching over seven decades. She represented stability for the UK in a postwar era.

https://api-assets.infowars.com/2022/09/qe1.jpg

The Queen took the throne when Winston Churchill was in power. Her seven-decade reign saw the decolonization of the British Empire in Asia and Africa. Her popularity has kept her in power for many years.

She became the longest-serving British monarch in 2015, surpassing her great-great-grandmother, Queen Victoria.

In global history, the Queen was the second-longest reigning monarch, outdone only by French King Louis XIV, who served as monarch for more than 72 years after taking the throne at age four and dying in 1715.

“Inevitably, a long life can pass by many milestones — my own is no exception — but I thank you all and the many others at home and overseas for your touching messages of great kindness,” the Queen said in June.
* * *
Buckingham Palace released a statement (https://www.royal.uk/statement-buckingham-palace) saying after “further evaluation” on Thursday morning, doctors for Queen Elizabeth II are “concerned for Her Majesty’s health.”
“Following further evaluation this morning, The Queen’s doctors are concerned for Her Majesty’s health and have recommended she remain under medical supervision,” the statement read.
The statement continued: “The Queen remains comfortable and at Balmoral.”
On Wednesday night, the Queen, who is 96, postponed her Privy Council meeting after being advised by doctors to rest.

Earlier in the week, the Queen appointed Liz Truss to form a new administration as the new leader of the Conservative Party. She met with outgoing PM Boris Johnson, who offered his resignation earlier on Tuesday, ending his time in office.

The meeting between the Queen, Truss, and Johnson would’ve occurred in Buckingham Palace, but the ceremony was held in Balmoral Castle in Scotland due to the monarch’s mobility issues.

“The whole country will be deeply concerned by the news from Buckingham Palace this lunchtime,” Truss tweeted Thursday.

“My thoughts — and the thoughts of people across our United Kingdom — are with Her Majesty The Queen and her family at this time,” she added.

631a34465e9c3c554fe3b5d5

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

From a British perspective; we tend to say "died" - it is what it is - and "passed' is an American euphemism to us and not sophisticated at all. However it is a euphemism that is gaining ground here unfortunately.

I much prefer 'passed', it's a little more gentle and, importantly, more spiritually accurate - we do not 'die' but pass from this realm to another.

Anyway, just my point of view.

[Brigantia]

A random thought - it's going to be weird to see new postage stamps and banknotes. They've had the queen's portrait on them my whole life.

[norman]

A random thought - it's going to be weird to see new postage stamps and banknotes. They've had the queen's portrait on them my whole life.

hah. clik, THAT's why they ran the op to this point. To freak out confidence in cash.

[Michel Leclerc]

(...)

Who cares if some shriveled up old lady in the UK dies? I never got this love affair with the Royal family they put on their under ware no differently than you or I do.

(...)

They don’t wear underwear. They always wear their portal.

[WhiteFeather]

Ding Dong the wicked witch is dead. She was a useless human being or should I say Reptilian. Sorry that's how I feel.


@ExomatrixTV, You took the words right outta my mouth. Good to know I'm not the only one that feels this way about that piece of Shyte.

[seehas]

Ding Dong the wicked witch is dead. She was a useless human being or should I say Reptilian. Sorry that's how I feel.


@ExomatrixTV, You took the words right outta my mouth. Good to know I'm not the only one that feels this way about that piece of Shyte.

exactly, the media special in europe will go crazy now, the "nice" old lady passed away , yeah sure

uTmwFY2Tndw

[Mare]

I thought the Alex Jones video ‘Ding Dong the witch is dead’ video posted above was so filled with factual errors within the first 2 minutes, I had to switch it off. The bible basher was the first red flag for me, but “Will Jimmy Savile be at the funeral?” was the clincher. That fiend has been dead 11 years.

How can you take that seriously?

[ExomatrixTV]

This is Queen Elizabeth II Family:


Absolutely Clear King Edward VIII Was A Traitor:

IUk9NIWir2Y
Biographer Andrew Lownie, whose book was made into a documentary called 'Edward VIII: Britain's Traitor King', has discussed with Sky News host Andrew Bolt allegations of the former king's links to Nazis during WWII. "It's absolutely clear that Edward VIII was a traitor and, frankly, should've been executed," Mr Lownie said.


The Traitor King:

jwpqw0sOyXY
11 December 1936. The King of England, Edward VIII, has given up his Crown, foregoing his duty for the love of Wallis Simpson, an American divorcée. Their courtship has been dogged by controversy and scandal, but with Edward's abdication, they can live happily ever after. But do they? Beginning his astonishing biography at the moment most turn away, bestselling historian Andrew Lownie reveals the dramatic lives of the Windsors post-abdication. A story of a Royal shut out by his family and forced into exile; of the Nazi attempts to recruit the Duke to their cause, and why the Duke, as Governor of the Bahamas, tried to shut down the investigation into the murder of a close friend. It is a story of a couple obsessed with their status, financially exploiting their position, and manipulating the media to portray themselves as victims. The Windsors were, in their day, the most glamorous exiles in the world, flitting from sumptuously appointed mansions in the south of France to luxurious residences in Palm Beach. But they were spoiled, selfish people, obsessed with their image and revelling in adulterous affairs. Drawing upon hitherto unexplored archives, Lownie shows how their glittering, brittle world was riddled with treachery and betrayal and why the Royal family never forgave the Duke for choosing love over duty.


Britain's Nazi King-Edward VIII:

dhnrnh3KLbk


Edward VIII - The Plot to Topple a King:

dRJge_3edIc

[Inversion]

This is a detailed family tree of the royal family going back to Alfred the Great 871-99.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=412rjcZ44Rk

[pueblo]

Heard one BBC talking head describe her as "the greatest public servant the world has known" which is funny to me because imo the monarchy only know service to self.

[pueblo]

A possible contender for inclusion at the funeral?

Wz_DNrKVrQ8

[Journeyman]

It's odd to read 'The King' and for it not to be a historical reference!

Indeed - but will it be Charles or William?

I wouldn't be surprised if he passes over the crown to his son.

If I had to guess I'd say not. In some ways its the smart move, but I think Charles will be left in place to deal with the crisis over the next 18 months, countries leaving Commonwealth, revelations about Diana, Andrew, more Meghanatrix etc etc.

Then after a miserable time being unpopular/lampooned etc etc after finally getting the job he's been preparing for his entire life he steps aside / fakes death and William succeeds as the 'peoples monarch'

[pueblo]

Hmmmmm...

1489686628054540290

[Losus4]

Maybe a lucky guess?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

If you consider her age (96) and health, there's a reasonable likelihood she won't make it to 100. So let's say 4 years. That gives you a 1/1460 chance of correctly guessing the day of death. Not impossible, but extremely unlikely.

The alternative is foreknowledge. How, I've no idea. But looking at the rest of that very weird twitter account (only a dozen or so nonsensical tweets), it is pretty mysterious.

[Bill Ryan]

Hmmmmm...

1489686628054540290That's extraordinary if this is for real. It seems one would have to have a twitter account to check out all the replies, which must feature who the heck this person is, and whether this could have been faked. One would only have to go back a short way (a few weeks ago, not necessarily back to February) to see if this was a genuine prediction.

[pueblo]

I had a feeling this was not quite legit.....I believe this type of thing is quite easy to fake by posting multiple possible dates from a private account and deleting them as needed until 'hey presto' you are left with the accurate prediction...

* Note my post above was in reply to Losus4, Mark (Star Mariner) and Bill, quote didn't show for some reason.

[happyuk]

I had a feeling this was not quite legit.....I believe this type of thing is quite easy to fake by posting multiple possible dates from a private account and deleting them as needed until 'hey presto' you are left with the accurate prediction...

* Note my post above was in reply to Losus4 and Bill, quote didn't show for some reason.

I've heard about the same technique, yes. I'm presuming this could all be automated to a large extent.
Or use a "bot" to generate a few hundred of these things on different dates and delete the remainder when the time comes, which for the Queen, God rest her soul, was not going to be that long.

[pueblo]

Slightly off topic but another hmmmm, I wonder what, if anything, will come out on a number of topics like her relationship with Lord Porchester and what actually happened to those 10 indigenous Canadian children who disappeared in 1964.


49551

[Le Chat]

Slightly off topic but another hmmmm, I wonder what, if anything, will come out on a number of topics like her relationship with Lord Porchester and what actually happened to those 10 indigenous Canadian children who disappeared in 1964.


49551

I can't see any resemblance in the photos you show. Maybe others can...

[Ravenlocke]

Posting this because the photos are intriguing. The look on Putins face….

https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/1567979009316724737
1567979009316724737

https://www.rt.com/russia/562469-putin-queen-elizabeth-condolences/

Putin sends condolences upon Queen Elizabeth’s death
Russian President Vladimir Putin has sent his condolences over Queen Elizabeth’s death to the new British monarch, the Kremlin press service said in a brief statement on Thursday.

“The most important events in the modern history of the United Kingdom are inseparably linked to the name of Her Majesty. For many decades, Elizabeth II rightfully enjoyed the love and respect of her subjects, as well as authority on the world stage,” Putin said, wishing Charles III “courage and perseverance” in the face of this “heavy and irreparable loss.”

“I ask you to convey the words of sincere sympathy and support to the members of the royal family and all the people of Great Britain,” the Russian president added.

Queen Elizabeth died at her Scottish residence, Balmoral Castle, at the age of 96 earlier in the day. She was the longest-serving monarch in British history with 70 years on the throne. The Queen had been placed under “medical supervision” shortly before her death, while senior royals rushed to the retreat to spend the final hours with her.

The Queen was succeeded by her eldest son, 73-year-old former Prince Charles, who has opted to keep the name Charles III for his official title.

[Kryztian]

1489686628054540290That's extraordinary if this is for real. It seems one would have to have a twitter account to check out all the replies, which must feature who the heck this person is, and whether this could have been faked. One would only have to go back a short way (a few weeks ago, not necessarily back to February) to see if this was a genuine prediction.

The account only has nineteen posts, most of which seem to be complete garbage, like this post, although numerologists might disagree with me:

1495900777516257283

How difficult would it be to set up multiple bot accounts, each one with a post like "The Queen will die on September 9th" and then another "on the 10th" and so on? I think one could write an algorithm to do this. Perhaps you would have to navigate some of those "I am not a robot" screens but there are some people out there with too much time on their hands that could and would do that.

[arwen]

For those who were doubting (earlier on this thread) that Charles would be incoming as King Charles III, it does seem a done deal. By the end of tomorrow it should be clear:


King Charles to address nation as monarch for first time (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-62847191?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA)


King Charles III is expected to address the nation for the first time as sovereign at 18:00 BST, following the death of Queen Elizabeth II...

...Charles will be officially proclaimed King at the Accession Council at 10:00 on Saturday in a ceremony televised for the first time...

The Accession Council on Saturday will be attended by his son the Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge on Saturday.

It is also attended by invited Privy Councillors and current serving government ministers - but that could also include former ministers, prime ministers, and senior clergy.

After the meeting, the Principal Proclamation, announcing Charles as sovereign, will be read at 11:00 from the balcony overlooking Friary Court at St James's Palace, central London.

...There will also be a rare Saturday sitting of the House of Commons, where senior MPs will gather to take an oath of allegiance to the new King from 14:00.

[arwen]

This livestream has just started, and Alexander Mercouris opens with some wise and statesmanlike words that I think are very apt.

When Queen Elizabeth took the throne, in 1952 and before many reading this now were born, Winston Churchill was Prime Minister on the UK, Stalin was General Secretary of the USSR, and Eisenhower was about to become President of the US. She has been there, as a symbol that has now passed, of a Britain (in a world) that now no longer exists.

And in a modern Britain which is facing massive economic and [potentially] social and political crisis, the loss of the Queen will feel to some, even unconsciously, as another figurative central tent pole that has collapsed leaving them with a loss of identity and a loss of hope or any national meaning or pride.

Mercouris says it far better than I just did, but the whole issue of what this means for the identity of the country is an important one. It's not about the passing of one elderly woman, it's about the passing of a symbol, something that was always there, year in and year out, whatever happened anywhere, that in many ways had held Britain together in maybe more ways than many had ever been consciously aware of.

:flower:

Paul Joseph Watson echoes this sentiment and articulates it superbly in this video, with regard to how it impacts the British people:

Paul Joseph Watson Responds To Death Of Queen Elizabeth II (https://www.banned.video/watch?id=631a657911933655964e45d9)


Whatever people think of her, and the institution of the monarchy, it is part of the British cultural heritage and is part of the collective culture of the people of Britain for the last 70 plus years. I have enormous empathy for what they are feeling in terms of losing an anchor point that has always been there, a stable datum.

I am NOT a supporter of the colonial legacy of this country at all. But I do have a heart for the people who are experiencing their country falling apart, and this just seems to reinforce the end of their country for them.

After listening to Paul Joseph Watson, one has more understanding and empathy for the British people. I am personally saddened to see so little empathy and respect for others when they are grieving, in this world now.

So little compassion, so little wisdom. So much hatred. It does not bode well for our species at all.

[Brigantia]

Slightly off topic but another hmmmm, I wonder what, if anything, will come out on a number of topics like her relationship with Lord Porchester and what actually happened to those 10 indigenous Canadian children who disappeared in 1964.


49551

This is old gossip - Kitty Kelley wrote about it in her book The Royals, published in 1997. Lord Porchester was the racing manager of her racehorses.

[Phoenix1304]

Greetings all,

Been watching this thread since yesterday and feel impelled to join in.

I’m disappointed in some of the comments e.g. ‘who cares if some shrivelled up old woman died”. Under any circumstances, about any person, that is simply an oafish thing to say. I can only assume that and similar comments are by those utterly convinced that the theory posited by David Icke is unquestionably true.

I have yet to be convinced, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, as they say, and I am still of the opinion that while David has delivered some big truth bombs over the years, material, I might add, that some of us were already well aware of in the early nineties, except for the sudden assertion that the royals were shapeshifting lizards that tortured and ate children, that was not backed up with any evidence. Ex satanic high priestess Arizona Wilder did not strike me as an unquestionably reliable source. I felt then, as I do now that the best place to hide a massive lie is right in between some big truths. Without irrefutable evidence it is the most pernicious and poisonous idea. Witness the comments here. It inspires hatred.

If I were the Devil, the head of the church would be a prime target, traumatise and disperse the faithful. Job done.

I have no doubt that there are satanists and the demonically possessed and I endlessly despair over the horrors mankind can think up to inflict on one another in this predatory world. Worse than any other animal. But symbolically, the Queen stood for all that is good. What if the ‘royals’ really are sincere Christians that take on as a sacred duty to better the lot of their country and the world? Many Britons just take that at face value. This is why she was loved. Call the plebs. naive if you like, but it’s not a bad thing to stand for.

Elizabeth the Great as she’ll likely be known in the history books, thanks to Boris Johnson’s tribute is, like it or not, a monumental figure. His words revealed a classically educated man steeped in the traditions and who understands the ‘hocus pocus’ as one journalist described the Queen’s coronation. That’s not to say I admire Boris Johnson, he’s a disgrace, just pointing out that a classical education is strictly for the elite nowadays. There’s clearly an agenda, but whether it can be laid at the Queen’s feet is open to question.

If a genie came to you and said, ‘here, you can be the richest person in the world, but you will have no real freedom ever, be told what to do and always be bound by archaic and demanding protocols for the rest of your life’. How would you like it? (I’m sure I’d do an ‘Edward’ and run away). I loved my freedom, the 1950s to 1990s were the best time for a woman to be alive in all of history as far as I can tell. Helen Mirren said “I’m proud to have been an Elizabethan”. Me too. It was a good era for so many of us.

I’ll be listening for Charles’ speech tonight, though I’m sure he’d rather be tucked under a duvet with Camilla being soothed at the loss of his beloved mummy and the prospect of having to finally take up the yoke at 73 when most people get to retire.

I’m not some flag-waving royalist that queues up in the rain for a glimpse of a new Royal baby btw - but show me a republic that is a beacon of integrity, justice, wisdom and compassion. The loss of that is the saddest thing of all.

It’s all circus and ponies at the end of the day, I guess. Harry was suitably punished by being the last to Balmoral and Meghan left out in the cold? Bet that was Camilla’s idea. The palace intrigues will continue as they have done for centuries in all corridors of power. Flawed humans and for all the privilege and alleged thriving on baby blood, they have joys and suffering and grow old and die, just like the rest of us.

The whole truth of it all will make a good movie one day.

But perhaps it already is, just that.

In any case, I give respect to, for all intents and purposes, a woman that played her part dutifully and beautifully, a part that was unexpectedly thrust upon her and she rose to the task admirably. Not many of us could have done as well. God bless the Queen, may she rest in peace.

[jaybee]

In any case, I give respect to, for all intents and purposes, a woman that played her part dutifully and beautifully, a part that was unexpectedly thrust upon her and she rose to the task admirably. Not many of us could have done as well. God bless the Queen, may she rest in peace.

Thanks for your (whole) post and I agree with the above...

cheers...

[Ratszinger]

Personally I was quite fond of Queen Elizabeth. Royals rarely smile and the queen did and when she did she could light up a very big room! May she RIP amen.Queen Elizabeth II, April 21, 1926 - September 8, 2022. I'll always remember her as the smiling royal with the greatest blue eyes.

[norman]

If we're doing a round of endearments.

https://img.ifunny.co/images/2bc1776eb0f74be512df7ce79e33c8b3befce7be68f3186f6e3ea02cdc32faff_1.webp

[Inversion]

The queen's royal cypher is EIIR. Regina means queen in Latin & Rex means king. David Wynn Miller (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118514-David-Wynn-Miller) said the world is controlled by Post Masters. In the book Montauk (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114560-Peter-Moon-Books&p=1420695&viewfull=1#post1420695): The Alien Connection by Stewart Swerdlow edited by Peter Moon it states the USPS is a front for a British bank.

Royal cypher (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_cypher#:~:text=Nowadays%2C%20the%20initials%20are%20also,standing%20for%20Elizabeth%20II%20Reg ina.)

inews.co.uk (https://inews.co.uk/news/er-what-stand-for-meaning-queen-royal-cypher-explained-king-charles-1844166)

What does ER stand for?

ER, or EIIR, is the Queen’s royal cypher. The ER stands for Elizabeth Regina, “Regina” meaning queen in Latin.

The II is to mark that she was Elizabeth II. However, in Scotland the II is not used, as Scotland did not recognise Elizabeth I, instead being ruled by Mary Queen of Scots.

The Queen’s EIIR features on traditional police helmets and postboxes.

What will King Charles’s cypher be?

Charles will use the cypher CIIIR, standing for Charles III Rex. “Rex” means king in Latin.

The new King has confirmed he will rule as Charles III. He had the choice to instead go by one of his middle names, Philip, Arthur or George.

While English queens use the St Edward’s crown, or a variant of it, on their cypher, kings traditionally use the more rounded Tudor crown.

https://imgproxy.geocaching.com/c7e1565366ae2c2616f8df8a01e049dcb04c026b?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bechler.free-online.co.uk%2Fgc%2FRoyalCyphers2.jpg

https://winstonchurchill.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/E-II-R-Pillar-Box.jpg

[The Moss Trooper]

Greetings all,

Been watching this thread since yesterday and feel impelled to join in.

I’m disappointed in some of the comments e.g. ‘who cares if some shrivelled up old woman died”. Under any circumstances, about any person, that is simply an oafish thing to say. I can only assume that and similar comments are by those utterly convinced that the theory posited by David Icke is unquestionably true.

I have yet to be convinced, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, as they say, and I am still of the opinion that while David has delivered some big truth bombs over the years, material, I might add, that some of us were already well aware of in the early nineties, except for the sudden assertion that the royals were shapeshifting lizards that tortured and ate children, that was not backed up with any evidence. Ex satanic high priestess Arizona Wilder did not strike me as an unquestionably reliable source. I felt then, as I do now that the best place to hide a massive lie is right in between some big truths. Without irrefutable evidence it is the most pernicious and poisonous idea. Witness the comments here. It inspires hatred.

If I were the Devil, the head of the church would be a prime target, traumatise and disperse the faithful. Job done.

I have no doubt that there are satanists and the demonically possessed and I endlessly despair over the horrors mankind can think up to inflict on one another in this predatory world. Worse than any other animal. But symbolically, the Queen stood for all that is good. What if the ‘royals’ really are sincere Christians that take on as a sacred duty to better the lot of their country and the world? Many Britons just take that at face value. This is why she was loved. Call the plebs. naive if you like, but it’s not a bad thing to stand for.

Elizabeth the Great as she’ll likely be known in the history books, thanks to Boris Johnson’s tribute is, like it or not, a monumental figure. His words revealed a classically educated man steeped in the traditions and who understands the ‘hocus pocus’ as one journalist described the Queen’s coronation. That’s not to say I admire Boris Johnson, he’s a disgrace, just pointing out that a classical education is strictly for the elite nowadays. There’s clearly an agenda, but whether it can be laid at the Queen’s feet is open to question.

If a genie came to you and said, ‘here, you can be the richest person in the world, but you will have no real freedom ever, be told what to do and always be bound by archaic and demanding protocols for the rest of your life’. How would you like it? (I’m sure I’d do an ‘Edward’ and run away). I loved my freedom, the 1950s to 1990s were the best time for a woman to be alive in all of history as far as I can tell. Helen Mirren said “I’m proud to have been an Elizabethan”. Me too. It was a good era for so many of us.

I’ll be listening for Charles’ speech tonight, though I’m sure he’d rather be tucked under a duvet with Camilla being soothed at the loss of his beloved mummy and the prospect of having to finally take up the yoke at 73 when most people get to retire.

I’m not some flag-waving royalist that queues up in the rain for a glimpse of a new Royal baby btw - but show me a republic that is a beacon of integrity, justice, wisdom and compassion. The loss of that is the saddest thing of all.

It’s all circus and ponies at the end of the day, I guess. Harry was suitably punished by being the last to Balmoral and Meghan left out in the cold? Bet that was Camilla’s idea. The palace intrigues will continue as they have done for centuries in all corridors of power. Flawed humans and for all the privilege and alleged thriving on baby blood, they have joys and suffering and grow old and die, just like the rest of us.

The whole truth of it all will make a good movie one day.

But perhaps it already is, just that.

In any case, I give respect to, for all intents and purposes, a woman that played her part dutifully and beautifully, a part that was unexpectedly thrust upon her and she rose to the task admirably. Not many of us could have done as well. God bless the Queen, may she rest in peace.


An impassioned post. It is hard to not agree with most of your stated points. Yes, she devoted her life to Royal protocol and duty and I am sure that she cared deeply about her family.

Her love for humanity as a whole, on the other hand, is questionable.

The Duchy of Lancaster, the Queens private estate (purse), is one of the biggest private investors in arms manufacturing. Depleted uranium, ammunition, land mines, mechanised armour.......... The list goes on and on. A conservative estimate has The Duchy of Lancaster holding assets of some £700 Million as of 2022

This was one of the reasons why Diana took-up the mantle and became the 'face' of the movement to ban the use of anti-personnel landmines. It was a 'dig' at the Queen.

Surely this is in direct conflict to the position of the head of the Church of England, and to one who cares deeply of her 'subjects'.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

I’m disappointed in some of the comments e.g. ‘who cares if some shrivelled up old woman died”. Under any circumstances, about any person, that is simply an oafish thing to say. I can only assume that and similar comments are by those utterly convinced that the theory posited by David Icke is unquestionably true.

Well said Phoenix. I am far from being a royalist. I do not like them at all, but that doesn't mean I wish any ill-will upon them - except maybe to go away. I would prefer to live my life as a citizen, not a subject. To me, the entire concept of monarchy is medieval.

But yes, of course, I've heard the rumours, claims, and conspiracy theories about the royal family. I am by no means naive when it comes to conspiracy theories. I have steeped myself in probably all of them over the years. But I'm chiefly interested in only those that are demonstrably provable. An example being UFO reality, or 9/11 as a false flag. Too many conspiracies lack a strong or large body of evidence to support them, and as such are fuelled by hearsay. They're more like conspiracy beliefs (I.e. David Icke's claims). And interesting though many of them are, I'm not that invested in what people believe in, any more invested than they are in what I personally believe. Beliefs are as weak and ephemeral as dust and smoke.

Some of the things I've 'heard' about the royal family are extremely unpleasant and disturbing. Apart from the sordid reality of Prince Andrew very few can be verified. And the Queen herself...I just do not know. How can any of us know for certain? We are only exposed to a fraction of the woman and the life she truly lived. None of us were looking over her shoulder witnessing each and every thing she said and did (in private) the last seventy years. We cannot in good conscience pass judgment on what we do not know for sure.

But oh, I have many questions. About the indigenous children in Canada for one. Diana is another. One thing we cannot dispute was her treatment of Diana, specifically after she died (was murdered) and how exceedingly indifferent she was. That certainly gets you thinking. Did she know beforehand? Was she in any way involved? Did she even sign off on it?

I don't know. None of us know - not for sure. Theory, rumour, hearsay is all we have. Even strong circumstantial evidence is not enough to condemn someone.

If foul play was really involved, and Her Majesty really did play a part in that, then she will face justice, as we all must for any wrong we do - if not in this world, then certainly in the next.

[Inversion]

King Charles III makes his first address to the UK.

historic-uk (https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/The-UK-Great-Britain-Whats-the-Difference/#:~:text=If%20you%27re%20still%20a,north%20west%20coast%20of%20Europe.)

The UK – a sovereign state that includes England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Great Britain – an island situated off the north west coast of Europe.

British Isles – a collection of over 6,000 islands, of which Great Britain is the largest.

England – a country within the UK.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bdRdV55l_A

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

A very thought-provoking fourteen minutes from Jordan Peterson.

_5os9bT9zuo

[Journeyman]

So I still believe this:


I think the Queen will die, or be said to have died, on a date with ritual significance. I know considering her age it gets ever more likely but I suspect when it does happen or is said to have happened it will turn out that the stars, gematria etc are in some way marking it out. I think it will be a part of this world event we're experiencing now. Whatever that is.

On Q. I'm not pushing it, but the references have been coming thick and fast and the Trump team are all but admitting involvement via music choices in their rallies amongst other things. So in that context, the following numeric 'delta' correspondences to QE have been noted:

49555

Note also the 911 reference. So what's the significance to Elizabeth? Queen Elizabeth was born on 21st April (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_21) 1926/ 111 days gone in the year, 254 to go.

Her official date of passing is 8/9/22, 3 days before 9/11. September 11th (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11) is the 254th day of the year, with 111 remaining. It is the 'twin' of April 21st. The concept of twinning and mirroring is very significant in occult thinking.

Why is there any connection with 11/9 if she dies on 8/9? If you wanted to follow this particular rabbit hole (it's not for everyone) I think Dan here may be on to something with the idea of a rebirth ritual:

UvRxCN1f_1M

Leaving aside the numerology I think the death of the Queen is a trigger point for a series of global events that may appear organic, but are actually long planned. The next few months I think are going to leave us dizzy. A global power realignment is imminent, as all the seeds have been sown for widespread discontent with ruling administrations across the world.

I expect revelations that may not seem so surprising to those reading here but which will shock mainstream society. Diana I think forms a part of it, which could give the new King some issues to deal with, along with the rapid dissolution of the Commonwealth which I think only affection for QE was holding back.

Also, think of how absurdly authoritarian the pandemic response was in Australia, NZ and Canada for instance and consider what the reaction would be if the suppressed news on vaccine effectiveness or side effects became public knowledge? It wouldn't just be the fall of governments, but the existing constitutions which failed to curtail the abuse of govt power would be utterly discredited.

If I'm right the world will be reeling from these events and it's at that point that we would be wise to remember the Hegelian dialectic and look to what emerges to fill the power vacuum. I think it will come about in opposition to the established cast of villains at the WEF and people will rush to support it...

Lot of ifs and maybes in the above post, but that's where I'm at.

Except....

As Columbo would say.... just one more thing....

Tomorrow will be 9/11. A date that these days everyone is aware of. As earth shaking as those changes above would be, I increasingly feel that the more significant movement is a spiritual one. I think a giant ritual took place on 9/11 2001 and all of these events are inextricably linked to it. As some will know, September 11th in the Gregorian calendar is not just any other day. In the Ancient Egyptian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thout) and Coptic calendar it's literally New Year's Day. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayrouz)

In the Hebrew calendar it's around the time of the Feast of Trumpets aka Rosh Hashana, although the exact date changes with the lunar cycle and many (https://goodnessofgodministries.international/2011/12/22/when-was-jesus-christ-born-the-bible-says-september-11-3bc-the-day-of-the-feast-of-trumpets/) believe it (https://www.abebooks.co.uk/9781466232389/September-11th-Day-Jesus-Christ-1466232382/plp) was the birthdate (https://www.newvision.co.ug/news/1174535/jesus-born-september)of Christ, as opposed to the 25th December which is linked to Tammuz.

You can find 9/11 IXXI being referenced in various masonic and other works. I think the events of the next few months are the culmination of a very long plan indeed

49558

and we will need our wits about us.

[Eagle Eye]

The Queen has left this world and will face whatever has done. Now if there is any honor left in Diana's children, it's time for them to speak in public about Diana's death and name those who are responsible for that.

[norman]

The first UK Column News since the public announcement.


UK Column News - 9th September 2022
https://www.ukcolumn.org/sites/default/files/styles/teaser/public/2022-09/ukc-news-090922.jpg?h=8d16384a&itok=CKlG_mZP

VIDEO:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-9th-september-2022


AUDIO only:
https://podbay.fm/p/uk-column-podcasts/e/1662730285

[ExomatrixTV]

Cruelties of the Queen Elizabeth II Reign (Not Discussed In Mainstream Media!)


“During her 70-year reign as queen, she never once acknowledged the atrocities that her family inflicted on native people that Britain invaded across the world,” Malema (https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/queen-elizabeth-ii-eff-not-mourning-9-september-2022/) noted. “She willingly benefited from the wealth that was attained from the exploitation and murder of millions of people across the world.”


source (https://consortiumnews.com/2022/09/09/cruelties-of-the-queens-reign/)
dutch (https://www.frontnieuws.com/wreedheden-van-het-britse-koningschap) 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

Hmmmmm...

1489686628054540290That's extraordinary if this is for real. It seems one would have to have a twitter account to check out all the replies, which must feature who the heck this person is, and whether this could have been faked. One would only have to go back a short way (a few weeks ago, not necessarily back to February) to see if this was a genuine prediction.


archive.org only shows 3 options all starts at Sept 8th and 2 days after ... most likely he edited his message ...

[Ratszinger]

Hmmmmm...

1489686628054540290That's extraordinary if this is for real. It seems one would have to have a twitter account to check out all the replies, which must feature who the heck this person is, and whether this could have been faked. One would only have to go back a short way (a few weeks ago, not necessarily back to February) to see if this was a genuine prediction.


archive.org only shows 3 options all starts at Sept 8th and 2 days after ... most likely he edited his message ...




Same author also has this posted in his account posted for the first time on Sep. 9th. 2022.

I've tried every button I don't know how you embed this damn thing so here is a paste of what he said I give up!


" Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
?
@aidemleoxide
A major world announcement will be made impacting a former US president on November 18th 2022


https://twitter.com/aidemleoxide/status/1568368811442585601

https://twitter.com/aidemleoxide/status/1568368811442585601

[ExomatrixTV]

Hmmmmm...

1489686628054540290That's extraordinary if this is for real. It seems one would have to have a twitter account to check out all the replies, which must feature who the heck this person is, and whether this could have been faked. One would only have to go back a short way (a few weeks ago, not necessarily back to February) to see if this was a genuine prediction.

archive.org only shows 3 options all starts at Sept 8th and 2 days after ... most likely he edited his message ...

Same author also has this posted in his account posted for the first time on Sep. 9th. 2022.

I've tried every button I don't know how you embed this damn thing so here is a paste of what he said I give up!

" Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
?
@aidemleoxide
A major world announcement will be made impacting a former US president on November 18th 2022


https://twitter.com/aidemleoxide/status/1568368811442585601


Notice how vague and not really specific the "November 18th 2022" message is!

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/2111/moonwalk1c1024.jpg (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/2111/moonwalk1c1024.jpg)


"November 18th 2022" will be Full Moon!

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[gini]

Full Moon at the moment of proclamation- you can’t make it up.10/9/22--7 min-uQAmE8PtQxw

[AriG]

A talking head on MSM mentioned that her funeral, which she planned herself, is projected to cost British taxpayers nearly ONE BILLION pounds. Millions of British “subjects” will not be able to afford heating for their homes this winter. Proceeding with a billion dollar funeral is unconscionable and illustrates just how little the monarchy cares about the people. They are parasites and should be forced to liquidate their Duchys to subsidize heating and then they should be unceremoniously exiled to live out their lives in squalor in one of their banana republics.

[Ratszinger]

A talking head on MSM mentioned that her funeral, which she planned herself, is projected to cost British taxpayers nearly ONE BILLION pounds. Millions of British “subjects” will not be able to afford heating for their homes this winter. Proceeding with a billion dollar funeral is unconscionable and illustrates just how little the monarchy cares about the people. They are parasites and should be forced to liquidate their Duchys to subsidize heating and then they should be unceremoniously exiled to live out their lives in squalor in one of their banana republics.

Everything is arranged for the royals and by their pagan calendar I suspect. It isn't a coincidence that Charles assended to the throne to the second of the Full Moon or that the Queen died on the 8th just in time anymore than it was coincidence for the day of the birth of William and Kate's fisrt son! All arranged according to their special days and it is likely the prediction for a former prez involves Trump and if he is indicted and arrested on the 18th of Sep 2022 ?? Well I don't mean to put the fear in anyone but they may be planning to, "Epstein" the former prez because Septembe 21 is significant to these ones following this occult calendar as the autumnal equinox as well as, Sept 21 being "Mabon" - one of the Illuminati's Human Sacrifice Nights! It's a very scary time folks.

[DaveToo]

I had a feeling this was not quite legit.....I believe this type of thing is quite easy to fake by posting multiple possible dates from a private account and deleting them as needed until 'hey presto' you are left with the accurate prediction...

* Note my post above was in reply to Losus4, Mark (Star Mariner) and Bill, quote didn't show for some reason.

Yes the technique has been discussed by a responder, right on the very account that made the 'prediction' <cough>.
Here it is:

teech
@IamThatIOm
·
22h
Replying to
@aidemleoxide
This account was set to private prior to yesterday. Likely made a prediction about the queen's death every day until it came true, then deleted the incorrect dates and made it public, to make it appear like a correct prediction.

No wayback archives before yesterday.

[Kryztian]

Queen Elizabeth’s Passing Could Push Some Countries to Alter Their Ties to the British Monarchy
https://time.com/6212004/queen-elizabeth-republicanism-anti-monarchy/

Queen Elizabeth II’s passing has sparked an outpouring of mourning across the world, but in many places, the end of her reign is also raising questions about what the future holds.

Over a dozen countries recognized the late monarch as their head of state, including Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Belize, Jamaica, Tuvalu, Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Her death is likely to ignite debate about whether her successor, King Charles III, should fulfill that role. Already, there have been calls for change.

Adam Bandt, the leader of Australia’s Greens Party, posted condolences to the Queen’s family on Twitter. But he added “Now Australia must move forward,” saying “We need [a] Treaty with First Nations people, and we need to become a Republic.”

Katie Pickles, a professor of history at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, says “As the importance of the monarchy became less important in society, places like New Zealand hung on because they held the Queen personally in such high respect.”

She tells TIME: “King Charles and Queen Consort Camilla will likely not have the same appeal.”

Cindy McCreery, a senior lecturer in history at the University of Sydney who specializes in monarchy and colonialism, agrees that republican sentiment will be given impetus.

“I do think that now that the Queen has passed on, that does give republicans in Australia and elsewhere more room to speak openly about the constitutional future and to kind of prepare the path for a republic,” McCreery says.

Anti-monarchist sentiment in the Caribbean

In some countries anti-monarchist sentiment has grown in tandem with racial justice movements, bringing anti-colonialist thinking and conversations on Indigenous rights into the mainstream.

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge faced a raft of protests on a trip through the Caribbean in March, with some groups demanding an apology and reparations for slavery. William and Kate cancelled a visit to a cacao farm, the first stop on their tour of Belize, because of protests.

Ahead of their visit to Jamaica, an open letter released by the Advocates Network, and signed by more than 100 local leaders, said: “During her 70 years on the throne, your grandmother has done nothing to redress and atone for the suffering of our ancestors that took place during her reign and/or during the entire period of British trafficking of Africans, enslavement, indentureship and colonization.”

According to McCreery, “Particularly countries in the Caribbean, which of course have that very painful legacy of British slavery in the past, I think they are more likely to be among the states that choose to become republics.”

In June, Jamaica’s Minister of Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Marlene Malahoo Forte, said that the process of transitioning to a republic had “formally commenced.”

Barbados, once called “Little England” for its tight British ties, became a republic in late 2021.

Republicanism in Australasia

The Australian Republic Movement, which wants an Australian to replace the British King or Queen as the head of state, declined to provide a comment for this article. But in a statement issued after the Queen’s death, it hinted at a political opportunity. “It is unlikely we will ever see a Monarch as respected or admired by the Australian people again,” said Peter FitzSimons, chair of the movement.

In June 2022, Australia appointed Matt Thistlethwaite, a former republican campaigner, as its first ever assistant minister for the republic, to help oversee the country’s potential transition.

“We’ve got this unique opportunity with a Queen coming to the end of her reign, for us to now lay the groundwork so that when that does happen in the future, we’re ready to go with a campaign and a chance to really create a truly independent nation,” he told the Sydney Morning Herald in an interview published on Sept. 3.

In 2016, then leader of New Zealand’s Labour Party, Andrew Little, said that “the end of the reign of the current monarch would be a good time to debate our constitutional arrangements. Do we still want to have our head of state living in London? Or do we want to do something else? Stand on our own two feet?”

New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said in 2021 that she thinks the country will become a republic in her lifetime.

Rawiri Waititi, a member of New Zealand’s parliament and the co-leader of the Māori Party, said on Twitter on Friday that “the huge vacuum left” by the Queen’s death “will cause debate.”

One New Zealand republican, who asked not to be named, told TIME that “There’s that very strong feeling of nostalgia with the Queen that doesn’t transfer to her son or grandchildren.”

“I think this is very much a moment when the discussion about possible moves to become republics will open up,” McCreery concludes. “I think that there was a great sense of restraint during the Queen’s reign.”

https://time.com/6212004/queen-elizabeth-republicanism-anti-monarchy/

[Phoenix1304]

Greetings all,

Been watching this thread since yesterday and feel impelled to join in.

I’m disappointed in some of the comments e.g. ‘who cares if some shrivelled up old woman died”. Under any circumstances, about any person, that is simply an oafish thing to say. I can only assume that and similar comments are by those utterly convinced that the theory posited by David Icke is unquestionably true.

I have yet to be convinced, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, as they say, and I am still of the opinion that while David has delivered some big truth bombs over the years, material, I might add, that some of us were already well aware of in the early nineties, except for the sudden assertion that the royals were shapeshifting lizards that tortured and ate children, that was not backed up with any evidence. Ex satanic high priestess Arizona Wilder did not strike me as an unquestionably reliable source. I felt then, as I do now that the best place to hide a massive lie is right in between some big truths. Without irrefutable evidence it is the most pernicious and poisonous idea. Witness the comments here. It inspires hatred.

If I were the Devil, the head of the church would be a prime target, traumatise and disperse the faithful. Job done.

I have no doubt that there are satanists and the demonically possessed and I endlessly despair over the horrors mankind can think up to inflict on one another in this predatory world. Worse than any other animal. But symbolically, the Queen stood for all that is good. What if the ‘royals’ really are sincere Christians that take on as a sacred duty to better the lot of their country and the world? Many Britons just take that at face value. This is why she was loved. Call the plebs. naive if you like, but it’s not a bad thing to stand for.

Elizabeth the Great as she’ll likely be known in the history books, thanks to Boris Johnson’s tribute is, like it or not, a monumental figure. His words revealed a classically educated man steeped in the traditions and who understands the ‘hocus pocus’ as one journalist described the Queen’s coronation. That’s not to say I admire Boris Johnson, he’s a disgrace, just pointing out that a classical education is strictly for the elite nowadays. There’s clearly an agenda, but whether it can be laid at the Queen’s feet is open to question.

If a genie came to you and said, ‘here, you can be the richest person in the world, but you will have no real freedom ever, be told what to do and always be bound by archaic and demanding protocols for the rest of your life’. How would you like it? (I’m sure I’d do an ‘Edward’ and run away). I loved my freedom, the 1950s to 1990s were the best time for a woman to be alive in all of history as far as I can tell. Helen Mirren said “I’m proud to have been an Elizabethan”. Me too. It was a good era for so many of us.

I’ll be listening for Charles’ speech tonight, though I’m sure he’d rather be tucked under a duvet with Camilla being soothed at the loss of his beloved mummy and the prospect of having to finally take up the yoke at 73 when most people get to retire.

I’m not some flag-waving royalist that queues up in the rain for a glimpse of a new Royal baby btw - but show me a republic that is a beacon of integrity, justice, wisdom and compassion. The loss of that is the saddest thing of all.

It’s all circus and ponies at the end of the day, I guess. Harry was suitably punished by being the last to Balmoral and Meghan left out in the cold? Bet that was Camilla’s idea. The palace intrigues will continue as they have done for centuries in all corridors of power. Flawed humans and for all the privilege and alleged thriving on baby blood, they have joys and suffering and grow old and die, just like the rest of us.

The whole truth of it all will make a good movie one day.

But perhaps it already is, just that.

In any case, I give respect to, for all intents and purposes, a woman that played her part dutifully and beautifully, a part that was unexpectedly thrust upon her and she rose to the task admirably. Not many of us could have done as well. God bless the Queen, may she rest in peace.


An impassioned post. It is hard to not agree with most of your stated points. Yes, she devoted her life to Royal protocol and duty and I am sure that she cared deeply about her family.

Her love for humanity as a whole, on the other hand, is questionable.

The Duchy of Lancaster, the Queens private estate (purse), is one of the biggest private investors in arms manufacturing. Depleted uranium, ammunition, land mines, mechanised armour.......... The list goes on and on. A conservative estimate has The Duchy of Lancaster holding assets of some £700 Million as of 2022

This was one of the reasons why Diana took-up the mantle and became the 'face' of the movement to ban the use of anti-personnel landmines. It was a 'dig' at the Queen.

Surely this is in direct conflict to the position of the head of the Church of England, and to one who cares deeply of her 'subjects'.

Thank you for your response. I didn’t know this about the Duchy of Lancaster. I did learn in the proclamations today that the monarch surrenders all crown property to the state, for the benefit of all, in return for the sovereign purse, so there’s plenty I don’t know about the crown, the constitution and it’s relationship with government and money, it’s never really interested me to be honest.

Did the Queen know, or did she just see balance sheets? They own SO MUCH. If she did and condoned it, it’s total hypocrisy and Diana was right to make a show of it, in any case. But to our shame the British government is heavily invested in trading arms and supplying despots around the world. Far too much hypocrisy in this once cherished bastion of moral fortitude. Will Charles make changes? I don’t know. The moral conflicts might drive him mad, like one of his forbears who, bullied by the government to impose a tax he was against, lost the colonies!

[Brigantia]

Thank you for your response. I didn’t know this about the Duchy of Lancaster. I did learn in the proclamations today that the monarch surrenders all crown property to the state, for the benefit of all, in return for the sovereign purse, so there’s plenty I don’t know about the crown, the constitution and it’s relationship with government and money, it’s never really interested me to be honest.

Did the Queen know, or did she just see balance sheets? They own SO MUCH. If she did and condoned it, it’s total hypocrisy and Diana was right to make a show of it, in any case. But to our shame the British government is heavily invested in trading arms and supplying despots around the world. Far too much hypocrisy in this once cherished bastion of moral fortitude. Will Charles make changes? I don’t know. The moral conflicts might drive him mad, like one of his forbears who, bullied by the government to impose a tax he was against, lost the colonies!

Now here's a tangled web. There is Crown property, which includes some royal palaces, then the revenues of the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, and then there's their personal wealth, which includes some residences such as Sandringham.

Then there are the art treasures and all the jewellery, some of which is personal property and some is owned by the Crown.

The personal wealth of the monarch is managed under a trust by the Bank of England; this is kept private and is therefore secret. Calls have been made in the past for this to be made public, but to no avail. The Queen owned a stud farm in Virginia, I assume that's part of her personal wealth, and I also read once that she owned vast tracts of land in Colorado.

With our troubles in this country and the health service in terminal decline, I have been thinking that they could sell off a few baubles and that would keep our health service running for a few more years so that many could get the treatment they need.

[Phoenix1304]

A very thought-provoking fourteen minutes from Jordan Peterson.

_5os9bT9zuo

Thank you for this Mark, I’m so glad to hear Mr Peterson speaking to the slavery issue that I see flung in the face of Britain so often by assorted hate movements. I want to shout “But we were the ones that stopped it!”. At least the acceptable face of it, we all know it still goes on, even if the cages are gilded.

An excellent, refreshing and positive perspective from him and I wish the peoples of the commonwealth could all hear it and know they had something precious to protect. But instead we see statues toppled and hissing accusations about imperialism and colonialism, that were indeed shameful all too often, but do not represent the present or the past actually. When Captain Cook was marching onto indigenous lands and planting a flag and saying “I claim this for King George’, everyone was doing it, Spain, Portugal, France. Another era.

We’re about to enter another era now. I don’t feel too optimistic about Charles, after his first performance at protocol panto today, he couldn’t hide the petulant Prince that really doesn’t want this job and never did. Dang duty. I can hear him whining ‘I’m not my mother!!”. Is he up to it? He and Camilla both in their dotage frankly and it will be hard for them. I imagine he will hand over to William pretty soon tbh. And we’ll have to go through all the panto again!

I thank you too for your earlier response to my post, agreed that many questions remain, Diana was definitely murdered I feel, in the moment I received that shocking news, I immediately knew it wasn’t an accident, I was fully engaged in running my new age shop at the time and never read newspapers or watched TV, I didn’t even know she had an Arab boyfriend, yet I dropped to my chair in shock and got one word. Mossad. For what it’s worth. Shortly afterwards I came across a piece about the Goddess Diana and her consort Dido. Dodi/Dido? And like my bewilderment at the Kennedy/Lincoln anomalies, have to live with knowing how much I don’t know.

I’ve never seen adequate evidence regarding the missing children but would ask, if they did require children for whatever, would they need to go to Canada to procure them? This pedo thing is a massive problem in our world today, maybe always has been, but Andrew and a consenting 17 yr old isn’t quite the horror we’re talking about is it? I think he was a fool to do the interview because he is a bit of a twat, and a liar, that thought he could blag the public like he probably successfully blagged his mother his whole life. Doting mums can be so forgiving... But is it as bad as we think? How many royals are on the flight logs to Epstein’s island? Charles’ so-called friendship with the obsequious, social climber and charmer Savile may have been quite innocent, Savile did a lot of charity work. Again, insufficient evidence, but all too easy to ‘connect the dots’ if you’re primed to do so. We need to be ever so careful in this alternative field we observe, don’t think it isn’t infiltrated with dark forces, just because the mainstream don’t cover it. We all need to navigate these times with a great deal of caution and critical thinking. I find withholding judgement is best, most of the time.

At 9/11 being told that a copy of the Koran and two Arab passports were found at ground zero, which was nothing but dust, I felt as a colossal assault on my intelligence, nothing surprised me after that. The BBC reporting the loss of a tower that was still standing behind them? There is quite a lot of convincing evidence that it was an inside job, not least the Lehman bros and the dirty dealings. Evidence that is ridiculed and suppressed. So what’s new.

UFOs, been passionately interested since childhood, but still know nothing. All what ifs and maybes.

Later…

I wrote this earlier today and just came on to finish it and saw the astrologer video that Gini posted. Seems my intuitions may not be far off the mark.

Enough from me anyway.

[norman]

Princess Diana won't go quietly

v1gofuz/?pub=4

[norman]

. . . but the crowd was shockingly quiet at her funeral though.


v1gu9bj/?pub=4

[Phoenix1304]

Just stumbled on this interesting thread on the Doctrine of Discovery….the ‘excuse for the biological urge to expand territory’ as one commenter put it.

1568252780292481024

[TomKat]

Well, native American school children in Canada are safer now.

[East Sun]

Ding, dong the ........./.w>>>>...is ,,,,,

[Inversion]

The date of the funeral is 9/19 which is the 157th (https://www.numberempire.com/919) prime. The previous prime is 911 the 156th (https://www.numberempire.com/911) & Pearl Harbor happened on 12/7 the 31th (https://www.numberempire.com/127) prime. It looks like the script for London Has Fallen (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3300542/trivia/?ref_=tt_trv_trv). That movie seemed to have been unavailable for several years after it was released. I can see the globalists pulling some kind of stunt. If something does happen the pattern states it was depicted in a Simpsons episode or in a James Bond film.

trivia (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3300542/trivia/?ref_=tt_trv_trv)

The site of the terrorist's HQ is the site of the 1854 Cholera outbreak that led to epidimiology and public health.

She was in ten episodes: simpsons.fandom (https://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/Queen_Elizabeth_II)

Synchronicity and the Seventh Seal by Peter Moon (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114560-Peter-Moon-Books&p=1426507&viewfull=1#post1426507)

P353. Aleister Crowley (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley) and Ian Fleming (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Fleming) of the James bond fame were friends.

funeral (https://www.royal.uk/arrangements-funeral-her-majesty-queen)

dailymail (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11204767/Joe-Biden-BEAST-Queens-funeral-Westminster-Abbey.html)

Logistical preparations are underway for the largest gathering of foreign dignitaries on British soil since Winston Churchill's funeral in 1965
While many world leaders will be asked to ride shared buses in from an undisclosed location in west London
Several others, including President Macron of France, President Herzog of Israel and Emperor Naruhito of Japan are likely to have their own transportation
There will be exceptions for the most prominent - including Biden
Buckingham Palace issued a personal invitation to the first couple late Saturday
The Bidens accepted it on Sunday but it's not clear if former presidents can go
The palace can issue personal invitations to anyone it chooses but has not yet said so

At 0:33 is the date of her death.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cS10G6q3Ca8
ielts (https://ielts.com.au/australia/prepare/article-how-to-write-the-date-correctly)

Whatever the format, in British English, dates are usually written in the order day – month – year, while in American English they are written month – day – year.

[Inversion]

IMO this ray of sunshine came from a space or high-altitude platform. The vehicle plate 4597 carrying her coffin is the 622nd (https://www.numberempire.com/4597) prime. The sub-primes in that number are 5, 7, 59 & 97. It looks like a reptilian prime fetich and here's a Pi (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?119255-Brought-To-You-By-Pfizer--Owning-US-American-News-Networks--&p=1512253&viewfull=1#post1512253) fetish. The Draco's home world is allegedly called Orion Prime (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118606-James-Rink-Book-s--Videos&p=1498075&viewfull=1#post1498075). Maybe they're responsible for the Fatima (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_F%C3%A1tima) stunt.

dailymail (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11205043/Touching-moment-ray-sunshine-shines-Queen-Elizabeth-IIs-coffin.html)

The symbolic moment was captured on camera during a procession which saw the Queen's coffin taken to St Giles' Cathedral for a service of thanksgiving
King Charles III led a procession to the cathedral behind the Queen's coffin which was draped with Royal Standard in Scotland and dressed with a wreath of flowers
It comes after a double rainbow appeared over Buckingham Palace alongside another one at Windsor Castle, with many convinced the Queen had 'sent a sign' and that she had 'really left us'

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/09/12/18/62329065-11203937-image-a-21_1663002582223.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/09/12/16/62301731-11203937-People_gathered_in_Edinburgh_to_pay_tribute_to_Her_Majesty_as_he-a-22_1662997404724.jpg

[norman]

Who remembers the 9/11 news scandal in the UK when it leaked that a woman inside the civil service messaged "It's a great day for bad news" ?

We're currently having a great week for bad news.

Keep your peepers open.

The 'young globals' with the short leash controlled media are already letting loose a few humdingers.

A couple, of interest, to get you going . . . . .

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110505-Covid19-Global-reports-news-and-updates&p=1517848&viewfull=1#post1517848


https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110505-Covid19-Global-reports-news-and-updates&p=1517774&viewfull=1#post1517774


and this one counts as bad news for some

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?110505-Covid19-Global-reports-news-and-updates&p=1517846&viewfull=1#post1517846

[Brigantia]

Who remembers the 9/11 news scandal in the UK when it leaked that a woman inside the civil service messaged "It's a great day for bad news" ?

We're currently having a great week for bad news.

Oh yes norman, I remember it well. From the archives - here (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1823120.stm).

Thanks for the timely reminder to dig deep for what they're slipping in unnoticed.

[Tintin]

It's odd to read 'The King' and for it not to be a historical reference!

Indeed - but will it be Charles or William?

I wouldn't be surprised if he passes over the crown to his son.




It will be Charles:


Her eldest son, Prince Charles, will now become King, while his eldest son, Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, assumes the position of heir to the throne.

Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/09/08/queen-elizabeth-ii-dies-royal-family-mourning-latest-news/

It remains to be seen; he may take up the role out of duty, but he is 73 now and he's always seemed more comfortable as a country gent on his Highbury estate.

He also has quite a temper by all accounts, and the way Diana was treated still lingers in many peoples' minds.

William is a lot more popular, and a monarch is entitled to abdicate.

Regarding Charles' temper, it seems you are right:

1569880383420002304

[Tintin]

In any case, I give respect to, for all intents and purposes, a woman that played her part dutifully and beautifully, a part that was unexpectedly thrust upon her and she rose to the task admirably. Not many of us could have done as well. God bless the Queen, may she rest in peace.

Thanks for your (whole) post and I agree with the above...

cheers...

It's a wonderful post that I really feel I could have, and perhaps maybe should have, written myself.

Well done :thumbsup: :flower:

[Losus4]

Money can buy you everything... except decent pens it seems. Get a pack of 20 bic biros from Poundland you would'nt have that problem. I feel sorry for Charles in that video.... I can't imagine he enjoys a life of 24/7 strictly regulated behaviour. It's not natural. The human within you is bound to lash out of its robotic enclosure from time to time.

[mizo]

What has surprised me is people I know and especially so some social media commentators that I've followed- those that I thought were 'awake or at least aware' to what's happening in the world are buying into the Queen and the nation-in-mourning BBC type reverent-softly-spoken-whispers type of commentary.

Heck even someone I respected and know quite well wishes to attend one of the Queens coffin processions, I mentioned to them if they're taking eggs and a anti-royal banner and was given short shrift on not giving respect other bull****e platitudes.

The UK mainstream media has done a grand job to date on the Covid Pandemics, War in Ukraine, Parliament and Politics and now this ongoing 24/7 coverage of The Royal Family solemn narratives that I can only guess that this incessant propagandized broadcasting was bound to hypnotize those who were only the periphery of being awake.

Still waiting for that MSM hook that'll drag me into becoming a Zombie, so I darn't plug in my TV just in case!

https://twitter.com/meredithmoo25/status/1569398415242534912

[Phoenix1304]

The date of the funeral is 9/19 which is the 157th (https://www.numberempire.com/919) prime. The previous prime is 911 the 156th (https://www.numberempire.com/911) & Pearl Harbor happened on 12/7 the 31th (https://www.numberempire.com/127) prime. It looks like the script for London Has Fallen (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3300542/trivia/?ref_=tt_trv_trv). That movie seemed to have been unavailable for several years after it was released. I can see the globalists pulling some kind of stunt. If something does happen the pattern states it was depicted in a Simpsons episode or in a James Bond film.

trivia (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3300542/trivia/?ref_=tt_trv_trv)

The site of the terrorist's HQ is the site of the 1854 Cholera outbreak that led to epidimiology and public health.

She was in ten episodes: simpsons.fandom (https://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/Queen_Elizabeth_II)

Synchronicity and the Seventh Seal by Peter Moon (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114560-Peter-Moon-Books&p=1426507&viewfull=1#post1426507)

P353. Aleister Crowley (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley) and Ian Fleming (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Fleming) of the James bond fame were friends.

funeral (https://www.royal.uk/arrangements-funeral-her-majesty-queen)

dailymail (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11204767/Joe-Biden-BEAST-Queens-funeral-Westminster-Abbey.html)

Logistical preparations are underway for the largest gathering of foreign dignitaries on British soil since Winston Churchill's funeral in 1965
While many world leaders will be asked to ride shared buses in from an undisclosed location in west London
Several others, including President Macron of France, President Herzog of Israel and Emperor Naruhito of Japan are likely to have their own transportation
There will be exceptions for the most prominent - including Biden
Buckingham Palace issued a personal invitation to the first couple late Saturday
The Bidens accepted it on Sunday but it's not clear if former presidents can go
The palace can issue personal invitations to anyone it chooses but has not yet said so

At 0:33 is the date of her death.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cS10G6q3Ca8
ielts (https://ielts.com.au/australia/prepare/article-how-to-write-the-date-correctly)

Whatever the format, in British English, dates are usually written in the order day – month – year, while in American English they are written month – day – year.

Thank you for your posts Inversion, numbers tend to make me catatonic at the best of times so it’s unlikely I will ever get into gematria or grasp it, but the Simpson’s video is extraordinary and not the first time they have made stunning predictions, like Trump’s triumphant descent on the mall escalator, even the notion that they must tell us upfront what their plans are doesn’t explain it. Unless she was murdered how could they possibly know the date? was this vid made after the event perhaps? Is there a thread on Avalon that discusses this mystery of the Simpsons uncanny prophetic ability?

[Inversion]

[QUOTE=Inversion;1517718]

Thank you for your posts Inversion, numbers tend to make me catatonic at the best of times so it’s unlikely I will ever get into gematria or grasp it, but the Simpson’s video is extraordinary and not the first time they have made stunning predictions, like Trump’s triumphant descent on the mall escalator, even the notion that they must tell us upfront what their plans are doesn’t explain it. Unless she was murdered how could they possibly know the date? was this vid made after the event perhaps? Is there a thread on Avalon that discusses this mystery of the Simpsons uncanny prophetic ability?

Here's a lengthy post (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?29140-Predictive-Programming&p=1478021&viewfull=1#post1478021) on the Simpsons. I suspect it's a mass tool to abide by universal law and skirt negative karma. The show has been running for 33 years and would be viewed as a useful tool by off-world groups. We can follow the Yellow Brick Road. The Gray, Reptilian, Draco & Black Goo alliance abducted Father Ernetti chipped him then seeded the idea for the god like tool the Chronovisor. From there the Vatican subcontracted it to DARPA and they seeded Hollywood with fragments of the future.

Alfred Lambremont Webre (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?33377-Alfred-Lambremont-Webre-J.D.-M.Ed.-Latest-Videos&p=1510936&viewfull=1#post1510936)


26:25. There are eight types of time travel technology according to Andrew. He mentioned the Chronovisor that was invented by the Vatican was subcontracted to the Pentagon.

35:10. Everything in the hologram has an address. There’s a 2D Chronovisor and a 3D version.

[Johnnycomelately]

The Stone of Density, a part of the coronation throne for hundreds of years, will be brought back from Scotland for Charles’ occasion. It was returned to Edinburgh from London in 1997, reparation for that throne having been stolen by King Edward I way back when. The Scots had coronated their kings on it for centuries before that.

Pomp and ceremony are PSYOPS, historical items/relics are tools to that end. Am not a fan of that BS.

https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/world/2022/9/14/1_6068744.amp.html

[mizo]

Both clever and slightly sinister

https://twitter.com/Karl_Was_Right/status/1570314755167997952

[Eva2]

Guard collapses in front of Queen's coffin. I read this happened to two different guards?
https://www.tiktok.com/@politicsjoe/video/7143592627932253445?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7142647155172443653

[Inversion]

A man was arrested for grabbing the queen's coffin and lifting the royal standard off the casket. He was tackled by guards and a seven-year-old girl was injured. There's only a still image of the incident.

dailymail (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11221121/Police-arrest-man-Westminster-Hall-attempted-rush-Queens-coffin.html)

Police have arrested a man who attempted to grab at the Queen's coffin - in an incident which left mourners stunned.

Officers tackled the man to the floor during the jaw-dropping incident, which took place around 10pm at Westminster Hall on Friday.

It is believed the man pushed through a queue of mourners, among them a seven-year-old girl, rushed up to coffin and tried to lift the royal standard. He is then thought to have put his hands on the Queen's casket.

The video contains a still & at 1:27 it shows the normal procession of people.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYOIoTbCdHk

update 09/17

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tOeJOjlBPM

[jaybee]

.

Live coverage of the Queen's State Funeral from GBNews...

02akByKtVwc

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum/status/1571500846466187272?s=20&t=WJtKFpC2eN7bHYpZpT0wJg

1571500846466187272

[Tintin]

I'm not a Royalist and have my own frustrations with the Royal family generally, but, as tributes go, this was quite something; an extraordinary moving moment in the only part of the funeral that I saw today, from St. George's Chapel Windsor, the Queen's piper. Something about the pipes has always sung to my soul. :flower:

The lone piper's lament:

1571898339662172160

[norman]

https://thumbnailer.mixcloud.com/unsafe/300x300/extaudio/8/0/2/a/d8b6-ccf5-4631-95e0-35ecf9144071

Mixcloud Audio:
Lou Collins - Children 1st – Funerals, Masks and Porn (https://www.mixcloud.com/shylou73/children-1st-funerals-masks-and-porn/?utm_source=notification&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=notification_new_upload&utm_content=html)






What types of people attract narcissists?
1,315,665 views Sep 27, 2019
58K
DoctorRamani
1.14M subscribers

4AkSWIquoaQ