Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

[lightpotential]

I am sure by now we have all seen the satellite images of the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano. Prima Facie it just blatantly looks like a nuclear explosion.

Hunga Tonga volcano Eruption (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10405447/Tonga-issues-tsunami-warning-undersea-volcano-erupts-Pacific.html)

I suspect it was artificially triggered by scalar beam technology, as with the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake.

A couple of months ago there was a lot of talk about La Palma being stimulated by earthquakes triggering low level seismic-volcanic activity. I did an analysis of this at the time, and concluded that the critical earthquakes that preceded the activity were artificial. I think the La Palma activity may well have been a test run for a larger operation, which in this case was triggering the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano.

My detailed video on this science is as follows:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYZq_GgKY_E

Keith

[angelfire]

Hmmmmm....


https://cointelegraph.com/news/tonga-to-copy-el-salvador-bill-making-bitcoin-legal-tender-says-former-mp?fbclid=IwAR0RC7NsTcdyE7ea_iEJdf27VbwcavHTAiDS_7mOtnxKAqDzWVQVBZHmOdM


Tonga to copy El Salvador’s bill making Bitcoin legal tender, says former MP
In a ruling that is “almost identical to the El Salvador bill,” Tongan bigwig Lord Fusitu’a anticipates that his country could adopt Bitcoin by November.
Another domino is lined up to fall down the route to Bitcoinization. On Wednesday, a former lawmaker of the Pacific island nation of Tonga shared a play-by-play approach to adopting Bitcoin (BTC) as legal tender.

In a series of tweets, Lord Fusitu’a, a former member of parliament for Tonga, released an ETA for Bitcoin becoming legal tender in Tonga. Copying El Salvador’s playbook, the move could onboard more than 100,000 Tongans onto the Bitcoin network.

In his five-point plan, the chairman of the Oceania chapter of the Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption describes the adoption path:
n a follow-up comment, Fusitu’a said the bill is “modeled on and is almost identical to the El Salvador bill.”

The announcement sowed the seeds for questions, predictions and outright jubilation from Bitcoin Twitter before the Tongan set the record straight. He enthusiastically replied that the timeline for BTC becoming legal tender could happen as early as November or December this year, replying, “Boom! That’s us, brother!” in a tweet.

In 2021, it was widely speculated that Tonga would become one of the next countries to adopt BTC as legal tender. Speculation reached a fever peak following a podcast Lord Fusitu’a undertook with Bedford-based Bitcoiner Peter McCormack.

During the conversation, the then-member of parliament shared the remittance case for adopting BTC as legal tender. He said adoption would provoke:

“A disposable income increase by 30%. With that extra 30%, some (people) are going to be saving it rather than putting it into the economy and stacking sats.”
Tonga is a remote island nation that relies upon remittances from countries, including Australia, New Zealand and the United States. The International Finance Corporation estimates that Tonga receives more income from remittances than any other country in the world, contributing up to 30% of household income.

Furthermore, while the Tongan population numbers just six figures, the Tongan diaspora is vast. The International Organization for Migration estimates the Tongan population living abroad at 126,000, with up to 18,000 Tongans in Australia.

The remittance use case was one of the primary drivers for El Salvador adopting BTC as legal tender. According to the World Bank, Tonga’s remittance as a percentage of gross domestic product is substantially higher than El Salvador, at 39% vs. 24%, respectively.

Related: El Salvador: How it started vs. how it went with the Bitcoin Law in 2021

Remittance aside, the Lord brought up domestic advantages for adopting the open-source protocol. He agreed that Tonga could create a BTC circular economy and that it’s “one of the few instances in which being a sparsely populated small island kingdom archipelago is an advantage.”

When the islands’ internet infrastructure was brought into question, the Tongan claimed internet and smartphone penetration rates exceeded 90%. The World Bank’s most recent figures — albeit from five years ago in 2017 — show Tonga at 50% internet penetration.

Bringing the islands online may take some time, but Fusitu’a is adamant about his country’s BTC future:

[Icare]

Why the volcanic eruption in Tonga was so violent and what to expect from "theconversation.com"

https://theconversation.com/why-the-volcanic-eruption-in-tonga-was-so-violent-and-what-to-expect-next-175035

And things could get worse (from the article in the link):

What we can expect to happen now

We’re still in the middle of this major eruptive sequence and many aspects remain unclear, partly because the island is currently obscured by ash clouds.

The two earlier eruptions on December 20 2021 and January 13 2022 were of moderate size. They produced clouds of up to 17km elevation and added new land to the 2014/15 combined island.

The latest eruption has stepped up the scale in terms of violence. The ash plume is already about 20km high. Most remarkably, it spread out almost concentrically over a distance of about 130km from the volcano, creating a plume with a 260km diameter, before it was distorted by the wind.

[Sunny-side-up]

One thing I noticed about the vid of the eruption was the direction of the dust plume in relation to the other weather directions.
I guess it shows how different the wind flow is at different heights

[jaybee]

I am sure by now we have all seen the satellite images of the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano. Prima Facie it just blatantly looks like a nuclear explosion.

Hunga Tonga volcano Eruption (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10405447/Tonga-issues-tsunami-warning-undersea-volcano-erupts-Pacific.html)

I suspect it was artificially triggered by scalar beam technology, as with the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake.

A couple of months ago there was a lot of talk about La Palma being stimulated by earthquakes triggering low level seismic-volcanic activity. I did an analysis of this at the time, and concluded that the critical earthquakes that preceded the activity were artificial. I think the La Palma activity may well have been a test run for a larger operation, which in this case was triggering the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano.

My detailed video on this science is as follows:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYZq_GgKY_E

Keith


very interesting - thank you - a glimpse into the secret war going on ....

top notch video :)

have you studied the data for the Hunga Tonga 'eruption' yet - and got any firm connections... ?

one thing I happened to notice, but it could be stretching it - around the approximate 32:00 time mark, when you are discussing the Hiroshima bomb you say that as the bomb was falling for those 43 seconds the sun was moving it's longitude position over the equator at 1522 feet per second... I wonder if that could be linking to 15th of 2022.... the fifteenth day of year '22......... dunno...... :)


I have only just started taking proper notice of the Tonga event...

[DNA]

I am sure by now we have all seen the satellite images of the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano. Prima Facie it just blatantly looks like a nuclear explosion.

Hunga Tonga volcano Eruption (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10405447/Tonga-issues-tsunami-warning-undersea-volcano-erupts-Pacific.html)

I suspect it was artificially triggered by scalar beam technology, as with the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake.

A couple of months ago there was a lot of talk about La Palma being stimulated by earthquakes triggering low level seismic-volcanic activity. I did an analysis of this at the time, and concluded that the critical earthquakes that preceded the activity were artificial. I think the La Palma activity may well have been a test run for a larger operation, which in this case was triggering the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano.

My detailed video on this science is as follows:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYZq_GgKY_E

Keith

Indeed

If world war 3 happens this technology will be utilized like crazy.
It's no small wonder that in the Edgar Cayce prophecies WW3 always came right before the shifting of the axis which ushers in global catastrophies on the scale of continents sinking and rising from the oceans.

[mountain_jim]

Cliff retweeted this - if not faked, appears to show a missile-like object entering sea prior to explosion.

https://twitter.com/clif_high/status/1483284504869425153?s=20

1483284504869425153

[Gwin Ru]

...

... from Jim Stone:
More garbage on the Tonga volcano "nuke" (http://198.46.190.126/pages/zz7.html)

Someone wants this hoax enforced. So I will make a few salient points that kill it

First of all, a lot of hoaxes get launched for the sole purpose of making alt media people look stupid. This happens constantly, and it is so prevalent that I would venture to guess that over half of what is found in alt media is complete fabrication pushed by hoaxers seeking clicks, and/or paid operatives poisoning the well from cushy seats in Maryland.

When wading through the resulting cesspool you need hip waders and crap filters. So here are a few obvious killers of the Tonga nuke hoax which is really a dive into total abject stupidity.

In order, from most stupid:
1. Some idiot thought he saw a missile on a weather satellite feed. Actually, I doubt whoever initially fronted the hoax actually believed it, this came out of a think tank somewhere because there's not a chance a random joe that stupid who could actually get hits would ever say it. Satellite feeds are so crude they don't have a chance of picking up a jumbo jet. They don't even pick up warships, they can't even see cities. They are SO CRUDE they cannot even pick up the prop wash from an aircraft carrier, which is ENORMOUS and "goes forever".
Weather satellites are SO CRUDE they would not pick up the prop wash from a giant container vessel making no effort to conceal it.
They make a huge scar on the surface of the water that extends back many miles, at least 20. Add to that the fact that you get one frame every two minutes or so, and there is no chance any weather satellite is going to pick up jack. The entire concept of this is so stupid. How is a missile the size of a bus going to show up on a sat feed that can't resolve a container vessel with a giant prop wash behind it?
1a. So once it was pointed out that there is no way a weather sat resolves well enough to ever pick up a missile (and I mean a thousand times incapable at least,) the story line evolved to "A russian sub did it". Because it had to have. Because the nuke story had to stay alive come hell or high water. How stupid.
2. I don't know what was more stupid, the missile or this next one, but I will make it number 2. There was a hoax video someone posted of hearing the blast from 700 kilometers away. The cloud from the volcano was absolutely ENORMOUS in the sky, looming far overhead, as seen 700 kilometers away and suddenly a nice fresh clear bang bang bang was heard. How fast does sound travel? How long would it take to get the cloud to look like that 700 kilometers away? I'd guess the timing of that was off by 15:1. And worse? The sound was fresh. And sounded just like huge firecrackers. I know why. Because that's what it was. If a sound from a blast like that arrived with that level of freshness from 700 kilometers away, it would have ripped every tree out and probably would have even removed the beach. THAT was NOT POSSIBLE. And idiots seeking the nuke story just gobbled it right up.
2a. We have precedent. The Nevada nuclear tests. How far away were they audible? They were not audible in Las Vegas, which was only 100 miles away. Vegas could see the flashes, see the mushroom clouds, feel the ground shake, and they could not hear jack. So if the blast in Tonga was a nuke, how was it heard 700 kilometers away? People experienced the effects of Tsar Bomba from that far away but the effects took the form of a pressure wave, not a sharp crack.
3. The whole story started because of the symmetrical shape of the blast. The symmetrical shape is standard. Any time you get an absolutely enormous explosion, the shape is symmetrical. The explosion OWNS the environment when the energy goes past a certain point, and the result is a symmetrical shape. Additionally, this blast happened underwater supposedly despite what the pictures and video looked like, which would have directed the blast symmetrically upward. The fact it happened underwater is supported by the fact that Tonga's internet cable got cut by the blast out in the ocean. An underwater blast would cause the explosion to be symmetrical on satellite, it would follow the path of least resistance which would be straight up.
Reputable people ran with the Tonga nuke story, which is impossible on it's face. None of the evidence presented washed in any way whatsoever. You cannot see missiles on weather satellites, you cannot hear nukes that far away, sometimes a volcano is just a volcano, what??? Did big volcanic blasts become history????

Tonga not a volcano??
I'd bet that if I posted it was a nuke like what some people are trying to spread I would get TONS of hits, because every time I post B.S. that's exactly what happens. "they" censor the real stuff so thoroghly that every time a report REALLY takes off I assume I must have posted a hoax so "they" take the censor filters off. To make sure everyone sees me look stupid. In fact, that's a key indicator I use CONSTANTLY. It is like a parity check. If anything I post spreads like wildfire it goes under the magnifying glass, and sure enough there will be info I did not hit that proves it false. That does not happen a lot, and when it does I issue a redaction.

FACT: Tonga was a volcano, nukes simply don't make that much ash, not even tsar bomba. Why on earth would anyone want to set off a sub surface nuke in Tonga anyway?

And the tsunami was not big enough for a nuke that would do what happened, by at least an order of magnitude. Nukes make HUGE tsunamis because rather than sliding land, the water gets launched by steam pressure. THERE WAS NO NUKE IN TONGA. I don't care if North Korea launched during the volcanic blasts, IF they could even reach that far it would take hours for the missiles to arrive. More flat earf. Flat earf serves the tribe well.

By the way, the sat footage people are using to "prove" a missile has ONE FRAME EVERY 2 MINUTES, which would never in a million years cut it for a missile or anything else. How would a missile show up in sat footage that only resolves to 5 kilometers anyway? You can't even see ships on that. That is just STUPID.

I don't care who is posting this, NO BANDWAGON FOR ME, or should I say someone fell off the apple cart?

________________

[Sunny]

I live 400 miles from the volcano, and we heard sonic booms for several hours. From the explosion, not nukes.

[Mike Gorman]

This British chap, Keith remember Kerry doing an interview with him post-Bill's involvement with Proj Camelot, I just cannot see how Arc distances are going to assist you with nuclear explosions, it is all very esoteric and clever sounding, but originally I think Keith used to assert that a nuclear explosion could not even occur unless these critical distances and Arc calculations were done, he seems to have come back from this original point and now suggests the resonances enhance and control the nuke power: well it is a pretty idea but somehow I think E=MC2 just works regardless of the time, regardless of the arc distances, but some of those coincidences are intriguing, I am not immersed in this calculation paradigm so perhaps I am not fully qualified to speak, but I have, shame about that.

[lightpotential]

I have done an analysis and I am convinced that the volcanic eruption was unnatural. I do not believe that it was caused by a nuclear device that was placed on site at the volcano, or that a nuclear missile was fired at the volcano.

In my opinion the entire event was artificially engineered by scalar beam technology. Two scalar wave beams were intersected at the target site; having been generated from facilities thousands of miles away from the volcano itself.

This is the same technology that Thomas Bearden speaks about in his book “Excalibur briefing.”

I am shortly off to bed, and have only partially done the mathematical analysis in-line with what I discuss in my video. I will try to post the full results tomorrow.

Keith

[onawah]

Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observes may have more to say about the Tonga event, but judging from his comments today, he didn't think it was all that remarkable.
sKFH1UuQ1aY
and later...
mZkgjEWTbKk

[Patient]

In the Extreme Weather thread, there is a video recently posted that shows a large flash of light that occurs just prior to an earthquake in China.

[palehorse]

I did read Krakatoa many years ago and the descriptions of the witnesses does not describe the one in Tonga, a very large eruption send to the air large chunks of extremely hot lava which cool down pretty fast forming some sort of porous stones (forgot the name of those stones), then it falls back to shore, in Krakatoa there were reports for those who managed to survive the event, that those stones which can be many inches large, came all the way down to the ship's deck.
In this large eruption in Tonga, there were no reports of volcanic stones falling, quite the contrary, there were reports people saying it was almost like vaporized ashes coming out of the supposedly volcano eruption. This alone is at least very interesting to investigate.

[jaybee]

The late, great Bruce Cathie ..... fascinating stuff touching on the 'meaning of life the universe and everything' from a regular guy from New Zealand (airline pilot) who discovered secrets of the scientific elite doing his own research -

Loads of interesting things in this presentation - but on the topic of this thread... a piece about volcanoes starting @47:20.... ...'volcanic activity is manifested by the same forces that they use for an atomic bomb...'

22ftg43K_Iw


I love Bruce Cathie... he must have lead such an interesting life... with his wife Wendy - when he was offered fantastic things so he and his family would never want for anything again - but he would have to sign official secret acts and whatnot... Wendy his wife immediately said.... 'no way' and although Bruce admits he was briefly tempted by the money and the chance to work in that field and learn more... he quickly realized his wife was right and he needed to be free so he could do his own thing and share his findings....... a real man of the people... :heart:

[jaybee]

I have done an analysis and I am convinced that the volcanic eruption was unnatural. I do not believe that it was caused by a nuclear device that was placed on site at the volcano, or that a nuclear missile was fired at the volcano.

In my opinion the entire event was artificially engineered by scalar beam technology. Two scalar wave beams were intersected at the target site; having been generated from facilities thousands of miles away from the volcano itself.

This is the same technology that Thomas Bearden speaks about in his book “Excalibur briefing.”

I am shortly off to bed, and have only partially done the mathematical analysis in-line with what I discuss in my video. I will try to post the full results tomorrow.

Keith


Thanks Keith - looking forward to that --- :thumbsup:

we are living through such extraordinary times..... everything that happens at the moment could be significant - we don't know what we are going to have to deal with next...

[lightpotential]

Hello Everybody

The following analysis does ideally presuppose that you have reviewed my video, as embedded in my opening post:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYZq_GgKY_E

It is a two-hour presentation to be sure, but it explains essentially from first principles just exactly how nuclear weapons are oftentimes triggered, only when a special relationship exists between the devices themselves, and the location of the sun at the instant they explode.

Now that being said, I will give a brief summary here by way of introduction, to those who may not have the time to watch the video in full.

Let me begin this way:

Consider an evaluation of a given nuclear device. You will firstly have the longitude and latitude coordinates where the device was activated. You will also have the time - even to the nearest second - as to when the device was activated (the archives being currently de-classified). Now in knowing the time, you can then use special astronomical software to work out the location of the sun at the precise moment when the bomb goes off.

Essentially, if we were to freeze time at that instant, and draw a straight line from the centre of the sun to the centre of the Earth, then that line would pass through the surface of the Earth at some point. That point gives us a set of longitude and latitude coordinates for the sun, as mapped onto the Earth.

It would appear following a very detailed analysis of the many nuclear tests that have been conducted throughout history, that certain arc length measures over the surface of the Earth, connecting the location of a nuclear device upon activation, and the sun itself, were very carefully chosen.

In this regard, one cannot look at these curved arc length distances as merely arbitrary, but in fact as actual wavelength distances - with an associated frequency - with nested sets of harmonics and sub harmonics.

The scientists exploring nuclear technology therefore realised that the precise location of the sun relative to a nuclear device upon activation, could significantly affect the actual yields of such devices. And that this had to be controlled for.

In this regard, the scientists discovered that certain arc length distances separating the coordinates of a bomb and the coordinates of the sun, were actively propitious in optimising the destructive effects of these devices, including their sub-harmonics and associated ratios.

Now because of this reality, it is also possible to examine earthquakes in like manner - or in this case a volcanic eruption - and look at the precise times they occur, and also where they occur (their latitude longitude coordinates), to see if there is essentially a ‘nuclear signature,’ as would suggest that they were artificially generated.

Extending the analysis further, in my video I also show that scalar beams - in line with the writings of Thomas Bearden - can also be used to generate high magnitude explosive effects, either atmospheric - in terms of strange expanding spheres of light - or underground, in terms of extreme seismic activity i.e. earthquakes.

One could therefore have two facilities greatly separated spatially, each of which could generate a scalar beam, both of which could be fired into the ground. NB: Scalar beams are a type of beam that have extremely low mass interference. Essentially, unlike standard electromagnetic waves, they can pass through the material Earth unimpeded.

If the beams are very carefully directed, then they could be made to intersect one another many thousands of miles away, even many hundreds of miles below ground, if necessary. The intersection of two scalar beams at a distance, is what actually unlocks the electromagnetic energy enfolded within. In essence, the scalar beams are transformed into electromagnetic energy when intersected (at a distance).

When a country is wanting to produce an earthquake effect using this technology by intersecting scalar beams at some remote location, they will invariably do so making use of certain special sun relations, as with nuclear weapons.

Now this allows us to determine if an earthquake is natural or artificial.

The various arc length measures on the surface of the Earth that link the epicentre point of the earthquake to the position of the sun, at the very moment the seismic activity begins, were the earthquake unnatural - should have a close affinity to the known arc length measures associated with various historically significant nuclear tests.

And this indeed proves to be the case with respect to the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption. The reason why it looks so much like a nuclear explosion from the images of the event, is because it is one. Albeit triggered by set of scalar beams, producing a nuclear explosion upon intersection.


USGS data

When the eruption first occurred and was mentioned in the press, I immediately looked to the USGS website (United States Geological Survey) to see if it were recorded as a seismic signature. It was not - at least not at first. Several hours later on Saturday it was finally recorded. If one looks at the USGS website it will have a diamond symbol indicating the location of the volcano when it erupted, along with its accompanying seismic signature.

The critical data taken from the USGS of the event is as follows:

5.8 Volcanic Eruption / Earthquake
2022-01-15 04:14:45 (UTC)
20.546°S 175.390°W
0.0 km depth

(It is interesting that the first articles that came out noted the magnitude of the event as a 7.4 earthquake. When it appeared on the USGS website however, it shows a magnitude of only 5.8).

The critical point to note here then, is that we have a precise set of coordinates for the epicentre of the event, and the precise time of the event - to the nearest second. Using the US Naval Observatory's own software (ICE 0.51 Interactive Computer Ephemeris), for the time in question, we can work out the latitude and longitude coordinates of the sun, as mapped onto the Earth at the precise given time: 2022-01-15 04:14:45 (UTC). They are as follows:

Sun coordinates:

Latitude (Geodetic) = 21.27369636 S
Longitude = 118.6316666666 E


The Nuclear Analysis

If you were to consider the following devices from history, along with their associated arc length measures tying them to the sun, you will find certain special basic mathematical ratios linking them to those associated with Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption.

The devices in question are as follows - all of them of extreme historical significance for one reason or another:

Bravo (1954) – 15 MT - the highest yield thermonuclear US test ever conducted
King (1952) – 0.5 MT - the highest yield pure fission test by the US ever conducted
Mike – (1952) 10.4 MT - the very first thermonuclear test conducted by the US
Grapple Y ( 1958) – 3.0 MT - the highest yield thermonuclear test ever conducted by the UK
Canopus – 2.6 MT (1968) - the highest yield thermonuclear test ever conducted by France.

Now consider the types of arc length measures that are significant for optimising a nuclear explosion. Each of them involve a separation arc distance between the nuclear devices themselves, and the ground coordinates of the sun at the moment of detonation:

1) The direct great circle arc (GCA) connecting the location of a nuclear device to the sun:
2) The elliptical arc measure from the equator to the latitude (EL) of the nuclear device (in either hemisphere)
3) The elliptical arc measure separating the latitude of the nuclear device from the latitude of the sun: latitude separation (LS)
4) The circular arc length measure along the equator that separates the longitude of a nuclear device from the longitude of the sun: Equatorial Longitude Separation (ELS)

In my video, I show several diagrams detailing these various arc length measures, as are adapted from my book Occult Physics, in which I have a major chapter on the secrets of nuclear weapons.

Now in this analysis, I have already worked out the arc length measures associated with the various nuclear devices, as given above. They are all detailed in my book Occult Physics, where I go into them in some depth. Here then, I am just going to show you the basic mathematical relations / ‘musical fractions’ that linkup the arc measures of the various nuclear devices (above), to those of the Hunga Tonga Volcano event.

Firstly, here are the arc measures associated with the Hunga Tonga Volcano event at the precise time of the eruption, as recorded by USGS (above):

Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 22341927.213269215 feet
Equator to Latitude (EL) = 7456734.4815364145 feet (south)
Latitude Separation (LS) = 264329.18300848466 feet
Equatorial Longitude Separation (ELS) = 24096701.01725671 feet

NB: All the values given here are in feet for accuracy.

Now consider the following arc measures in summary, that tied-in to the listed nuclear devices above:

Mike: Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 32123600.77 feet
Grapple Y: Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 18734896.30 feet
Bravo: Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 35807863.08
King: Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 13428155.35 feet
King: Latitude Separation (LS) = 11012894.51 feet
King: Equator to latitude of bomb (EL) = 4195109.612 feet
Canopus: latitude Separation (LS) = 12048521.52 feet


In view of this data, consider the basic mathematical ratios present, when one divides the arc measures associated with the Tonga Volcano event with those of the listed nuclear devices.

Herein I will show you what the ratios are in their raw form, and what the intended ideal ratios would appear to be, and also, what the error from perfection is (in terms of feet):


Canopus LS / Hunga Tonga ELS
= 12048521.52 / 24096701.01
= 0.500007097
Ideal = 0.5
Error = 171 feet

Mike GCA / Hunga Tonga ELS
= 32123600.77 / 24096701.02
= 1.333111978
Ideal = 1.333333333… (4/3)
Error = 4000.4 feet

Grapple Y GCA / Hunga Tonga ELS
= 18734896.30 / 24096701.02
= 0.777488017
Ideal = 0.7776 (486/625)
Error = 3470 feet
NB: 0.7776 is of the primary base-60 system
e.g. 7776 / 6 = 1296, 1296 / 6 = 216, 216 / 6 = 36, 36 / 6 = 6

Hunga Tonga LS / King LS
= 264329.183 / 11012894.51
= 0.024001790
Ideal = 0.024 (3/125)
Error = 19.7 feet

King GCA / Hunga Tonga EL
= 13428155.35 / 7456734.482
= 1.800809105
Ideal = 1.8 (9/5)
Error = 3351.8 feet

Bravo GCA / Hunga Tonga EL
= 35807863.08 / 7456734.482
= 4.802083695
Ideal = 4.8 (24/5)
Error = 3236.9 feet


From careful consideration of the above, we can see a very close affinity between the arc length measures associated with the Tonga Volcano event, and those of known historical nuclear tests of great prominence. The basic fractional relations imply that the Tonga Volcano event was itself a nuclear event.

Now this is something that you need to think very carefully about. All of the arc length measures as noted are dynamically established by the active movement of the sun's ground position over the Earth, which is dependent upon the rotation of the Earth on its axis. As the Earth is continually in motion, the arc length measures of all of the events listed are only fleetingly established.

Indeed, in one single second of time, at the equator of the Earth, the Sun sweeps out just over 1500 feet. When you consider this fact, and then consider the error rates as noted, one should realise the extreme accuracy in timing – of what can only be described as an attack - on the Tonga Volcano. The precision targeting and production of an emergent explosion within the Volcano via intersecting Scalar beams was timed with almost split-second accuracy.

The relations as thus detailed, would appear to decisively confirm that the event was entirely artificial, having all the hallmarks of a nuclear attack.

Keith

[Harmony]

lightpotential,


Thank you Keith for the information and explaining further the dynamics. Is it possible that you could work out the sources of the scaler sites that would be able to initiate the explosion from the information you already have?

[jaybee]

From careful consideration of the above, we can see a very close affinity between the arc length measures associated with the Tonga Volcano event, and those of known historical nuclear tests of great prominence. The basic fractional relations imply that the Tonga Volcano event was itself a nuclear event.

Now this is something that you need to think very carefully about. All of the arc length measures as noted are dynamically established by the active movement of the sun's ground position over the Earth, which is dependent upon the rotation of the Earth on its axis. As the Earth is continually in motion, the arc length measures of all of the events listed are only fleetingly established.



Many thanks, Keith for your epic post.... I've just lifted this small part out to rest an enquiry on....

You have done extensive work on these findings and are used to dealing with the concepts and numbers etc - so I might have missed the answer to my enquiry with your post.... because I'm just dipping in...

I'm still not sure what separates the Tonga volcanic event from a natural eruption... because if all the conditions for a natural eruption ie position of sun and harmonic distances would have to exist for a natural eruption as well... what makes it different...?

I'm perfectly open for it being a scalar beam interference event and then the question would be who and why -

In the Bruce Cathie video in my #15 he talks about ... 'volcanic activity is manifested by the same forces that they use for an atomic bomb...' and I'm guessing that it was by studying the sun positions and whatnot for historic volcanic eruptions that scientists learnt how to use nuclear material to get a significant detonation...?

Bruce Cathie also said how nuclear testing could interfere with the natural harmonics and create volcanic eruptions in other (harmonically connected?) places - - which could involve another question regarding the Tonga Event - - could something have happened somewhere else, something unnatural involving Advanced Technology and the Tonga eruption was a by product rather than the direct target...?

I might be making this more complicated than it already is so to try and clarify the question...

If naturally occurring volcano eruptions need the same sun positions and harmonic conditions as artificial ones - what makes the Tonga one definitely artificial...?

Sorry if I've missed the vital info in your post about it....

cheers and thanks for your work - :thumbsup:

[lightpotential]

Interestingly enough Harmony, it is something that I have thought about – though not with respect to this particular event. I do not think the Tonga volcano event is susceptible to the type of analysis that would be required to determine the direction of the scalar beams that converged upon the site. It least with the information I have seen.

That being said, I do believe that 911 involved scalar beams also, and that they were the primary means by which the towers were disintegrated in mid-air. Dr Judy Wood did a lot of work in this area, and one of the things that she found was that there were certain car parks near the towers, where some of the cars had suffered some sort of disintegration of various metal parts e.g. their engines. It is as if certain metals were susceptible to the scalar beams - metals which were targeted directly within the twin towers.

Now it is my contention that at least two facilities located many thousands of miles away from the two Towers were involved in generating the scalar beams used in the attack. And that each beam was fired through the Earth and came up through the ground to converge on the 2 targets (WTC1 & WTC2); the two beams intersecting one another over each tower, in sequence.

If this is correct - and this is something that I have wondered about for some time - then it might be possible to take a line from each of the towers and extended to the cars that were affected, and so determine a direction line. You would then have to try to map out a great circle over the surface of the Earth extending the direction line even further, to see if it matched up with some sort of unusual military-type facility.

It is something I've thought about for several years, though I have never attempted the analysis.

Keith

[Harmony]

Your reply Keith above is very much appreciated. It would be great to find ways to reveal what is happening and who is behind these "hidden deeds" . Of course it could be very dangerous to reveal that knowledge unless everyone was notified at the same time what is being done in the type of silent war we almost certainly are experiencing.

[Gwin Ru]

Tonga volcano eruption created puzzling ripples in Earth's atmosphere (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00127-1)

David Adam
Nature (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00127-1)
Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:36 UTC
SOTT Comment: (https://www.sott.net/article/463326-Tonga-volcano-eruption-created-puzzling-ripples-in-Earths-atmosphere) We're through the looking glass here people!
Powerful waves ringing through the atmosphere after the eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai are unlike anything seen before.

https://www.sott.net/image/s31/634271/large/d41586_022_00127_1_20043630.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s31/634271/full/d41586_022_00127_1_20043630.jpg)
The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s GOES-West satellite captured the explosive eruption of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haʻapai. © NOAA


Scientists are racing to understand a puzzling series of massive ripples in Earth's atmosphere triggered by the eruption of the Tongan volcano at the weekend. Satellite data shows that the event — which some fear might have devastated the Pacific-island nation — provoked an unusual pattern of atmospheric gravity waves. Previous volcanic eruptions have not produced such a signal, leaving experts stumped.
"It's really unique. We have never seen anything like this in the data before," says Lars Hoffmann, an atmospheric scientist at the Jülich Supercomputing Centre in Germany.
The discovery was made in images collected by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), mounted on Nasa's Aqua satellite, in the hours after the eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai volcano on 14 January.

They show dozens of concentric circles, each representing a fast-moving wave in the gases of the atmosphere, stretching for more than 16,000 kilometres. The waves reached from the ocean surface to the ionosphere, and researchers think that they probably passed around the globe several times.

'Nice concentric wave patterns'
"This instrument has been operating for something like 20 years now and we have never seen such nice concentric wave patterns," Hoffmann adds.
Atmospheric gravity waves occur when air molecules in the atmosphere are vertically, rather than horizontally, disturbed in the air column. This can happen as wind picks up speed as it rises over a mountaintop, or as a result of convection in local weather systems.

The up-and-down waves transfer energy and momentum through the atmosphere, and often show their effects in the way in which they cause high clouds to form in a series of ripples.


https://www.sott.net/image/s31/634272/large/d41586_022_00127_1_20043652.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s31/634272/full/d41586_022_00127_1_20043652.jpg)
Images from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder on NASA’s Aqua satellite show dozens of concentric circles, which are fast-moving atmospheric waves.© Lars Hoffmann, Jülich Supercomputing Centre. AIRS Level-1 data by NASA DES DISC


In theory, the rapid updraft of hot air and ash from an erupting volcano into the upper atmosphere could trigger gravity waves on a much larger scale. But nothing like this has been observed with previous eruptions analysed since the AIRS instrument was launched in May 2002.
"That's what's really puzzling us," says Corwin Wright, an atmospheric physicist at the University of Bath, UK.

"It must have something to do with the physics of what's going on, but we don't know what yet."
He and his co-workers suspect that a "great big, messy pile of hot gases" in the upper atmosphere might be what kicks the waves off. The hot gas is "going up high into the stratosphere and knocking the air around", he says.
SOTT Comment: (https://www.sott.net/article/463326-Tonga-volcano-eruption-created-puzzling-ripples-in-Earths-atmosphere) Or, the atmosphere's composition has fundamentally altered - electro-chemically - in recent decades, producing 'novel effects'. See 'chemtrails', for example, which are mostly jet contrails lingering longer in the atmosphere than they used to.
Eruption heard across the planet
The eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai volcano was heard across the South Pacific, and even in parts of the United States. Ash has covered many regions of Tonga, but a loss of power, phone lines and Internet connectivity has made it difficult for aid agencies to assess the extent of injuries, fatalities and damage.

Wright, who was the first to spot the wave patterns in data supplied by Hoffmann, says that the images show what looks like a mixture of wave sizes and types.

The convection in the atmosphere seems to be "very complicated and bumpy, and it's generating a whole family of things at the same time", he says. "That is what we currently think is going on, but we've only been looking at it for a few hours."

The discovery was prompted by a tweet (https://twitter.com/sosprey/status/1482355319456075780) sent to Wright on 15 January from Scott Osprey, a climate scientist at the University of Oxford, UK, who asked: "Wow, I wonder how big the atmospheric gravity waves are from this eruption?!"

Explosive speed
Osprey says that the eruption might have been unique in causing these waves because it happened very quickly relative to other eruptions.
"This event seems to have been over in minutes, but it was explosive and it's that impulse that is likely to kick off some strong gravity waves," he says.
The eruption might have lasted moments, but the impacts could be long-lasting. Gravity waves can interfere with a cyclical reversal of wind direction in the tropics, Osprey says, and this could affect weather patterns as far away as Europe.
"We'll be looking very carefully at how that evolves," he says.
The imagery and data collected from the eruption has been "spectacular" and has presented scientists with an exciting opportunity, says Vicki Ferrini, a marine geophysicist at Columbia University in New York City. But she adds that she and others remain deeply concerned for the people of Tonga, particularly given the absence so far of detailed information on the scale of the disaster.

Researchers in New Zealand say that they are closely monitoring the volcano for further eruptions. "We are just keeping our ears to the ground," says Shane Cronin, a volcanologist at the University of Auckland. The volcano could be resupplied with large amounts of magma from deep underground and produce more explosive eruptions, he says. But if it has exhausted its main supply, it might produce only smaller eruptions, largely hidden beneath the surface of the ocean.

[avid]

Reminds me of weather manipulation ripples, something isn’t ‘natural’ here? However, whatever the reason, why Tonga? Why now? Nothing seems to make sense any more :facepalm:

[lightpotential]

Jaybee

I disagree with Cathie on this point. In fact, there are many things that Cathie did get wrong. I discuss some of these at length in my book. In the Cathie video you cite, you give the quote: "'volcanic activity is manifested by the same forces that they use for an atomic bomb..." I disagree if by this Cathie is saying that Volcanoes are all triggered by precise harmonics, as I demonstrate with respect to the Tonga volcano. I do not believe they are at all. This 'signature' as I identify it is entirely artificial, and in line with nuclear technology. In my opinion you do not get precise relations like this from natural volcanic eruptions.

[jaybee]

Jaybee

I disagree with Cathie on this point. In fact, there are many things that Cathie did get wrong. I discuss some of these at length in my book. In the Cathie video you cite, you give the quote: "'volcanic activity is manifested by the same forces that they use for an atomic bomb..." I disagree if by this Cathie is saying that Volcanoes are all triggered by precise harmonics, as I demonstrate with respect to the Tonga volcano. I do not believe they are at all. This 'signature' as I identify it is entirely artificial, and in line with nuclear technology. In my opinion you do not get precise relations like this from natural volcanic eruptions.


Thanks for your reply --

If he were still alive I'm sure Bruce Cathie would be more than willing to discuss your points of disagreement and if found to be incorrect adjust his findings accordingly...

from his book ... 'The Energy Grid - Harmonic 695 - The Pulse of the Universe..'

https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/alien.ufo/Cathie,%20Bruce%20-%20Harmonic%20695.pdf

(page 22/23)

I am neither a naive fantasy fan, nor a proselytizer of any particular brand of faith. I am in complete accord with the French authors, Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergior1, in that I declare: it is (The Dawn of Magic, 1963) not necessary to believe everything; it is only necessary to look at everything, to study and to examine everything; to explore with an unbiased mind, free of bigotry; to sift evidence and known facts, and upon these to reach certain tentative conclusions which are not the product of preconcieved notions. I hope that at least a large number of readers will feel the same way.


for the record this is what he says about volcanoes and earthquakes in the above book...


(page 23)

The thinking up to this point followed rationally from the theories of Einstein which state, in part, that the geometric relationships of space and time control all physical processes.

My findings led me to conclude, further, that volcanic activity, atomic disruption (nuclear bomb detonations) and earthquakes could all be related to the grid structure, an atomic bomb being a space time geometric device, and volcanos and earthquakes occurring on geometric points of the grid system, due to disturbances at these points.

A correlation of all these different phenomena led me to conclude that all major changes of physical state, anywhere in the world, are brought about by the harmonic interactions of those manifestations which we refer to as: light; gravity; mass; and electrical and magnetic forces.

cheers

[jaybee]

I was just having a look at this on the Wiki site (I know you have to be cautious about wikipedia but this appears to be straight forward information...) ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunga_Tonga%E2%80%93Hunga_Ha%CA%BBapai


December 2021–January 2022 eruption
Main article: 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption and tsunami

On 20 December 2021 the volcano erupted again, causing a large plume that was visible from Nukuʻalofa.[50] The Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre Wellington issued an advisory to airlines.[51] Explosions could be heard up to 170 kilometres (110 mi) away.[52] The initial eruption continued until 2 am on 21 December.[50] Activity continued, and on 25 December, satellite imagery showed that the island had increased in size.[53]

Volcanic activity died down on 5 January[54] before restarting on 13 January after the volcano sent an ash cloud 17 km (55,000 ft) into the atmosphere.[55] The government subsequently issued a tsunami warning.[56][57] On 15 January, the volcano violently erupted again, about seven times more powerfully than the eruption on 20 December 2021. There were numerous reports of loud booms across Tonga and other countries, such as Fiji and as far away as New Zealand and Australia. A boom was heard in Alaska seven hours after eruption. The eruption set off a massive atmospheric shockwave travelling at about 300 m (1,000 ft) per second.[58] Near the eruption, the explosion damaged property, including shattered windows.[59] A tsunami warning was issued just after 5:30 p.m. by the Tonga Meteorological Services and the tsunami flooded coastal areas in Tonga. A 3.9 ft (1.2 m) tsunami was observed in Nukuʻalofa, Tonga and a 2.0 ft (0.61 m) one in American Samoa.[60]


so it all started on the Winter Solstice.... and continued over the Christmas period, dying down on the 5th Jan before blasting out again even stronger on Jan 14/15... I say 14/15 because some articles say 14th and some say 15th...

Speculation... I think emotional energies were quite difficult over the Christmas Period and I wouldn't be surprised if this was a world wide state of (emotional) affairs - I also wouldn't be surprised if the whole earth was subjected to an energetic attack to damp down positivity and happiness... because at the moment there seems to be concerted efforts by 'the enemy' ie Multi Millionaires and Billionaires waging war on the Masses - to do everything they can to confuse and dumb down and demoralize us all....

Something happened around this time and I can't remember the exact date and time - possibly just before the bigger eruption (not sure as I didn't make a note and something similar happens occasionally although this was probably the strongest one I've had...) - don't know if anyone else has this happen and had it happen around the same time ----- but it's like you suddenly have a deep buzz - like all encompassing - like a sucking deep buzz - in your ear (and head) - this was in my left ear, just the left - and you think oh oh what's going on then after a few seconds it dies down and disappears - I was aware that this was maybe the strongest one I've had like this and as I wear a piece of tourmaline crystal on a necklace I stuck it in my ear thinking it could help protect from what-ever-it-was :) - I never get earache but about 3/4 days ago I had a funny kind of ear ache briefly in my left ear - again just the left - so I put the tourmaline back in for a few minutes :)

why I am relating this weird ear pressure/ buzzing is because of what is said about the disturbance from the eruption going around the earth - so technically it would have hit everyone...

[Delight]

I am sure by now we have all seen the satellite images of the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano. Prima Facie it just blatantly looks like a nuclear explosion.

Hunga Tonga volcano Eruption (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10405447/Tonga-issues-tsunami-warning-undersea-volcano-erupts-Pacific.html)

I suspect it was artificially triggered by scalar beam technology, as with the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake.

A couple of months ago there was a lot of talk about La Palma being stimulated by earthquakes triggering low level seismic-volcanic activity. I did an analysis of this at the time, and concluded that the critical earthquakes that preceded the activity were artificial. I think the La Palma activity may well have been a test run for a larger operation, which in this case was triggering the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano.

My detailed video on this science is as follows:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYZq_GgKY_E

Keith


very interesting - thank you - a glimpse into the secret war going on ....

top notch video :)

have you studied the data for the Hunga Tonga 'eruption' yet - and got any firm connections... ?

one thing I happened to notice, but it could be stretching it - around the approximate 32:00 time mark, when you are discussing the Hiroshima bomb you say that as the bomb was falling for those 43 seconds the sun was moving it's longitude position over the equator at 1522 feet per second... I wonder if that could be linking to 15th of 2022.... the fifteenth day of year '22......... dunno...... :)


I have only just started taking proper notice of the Tonga event...

I am not sure what earth changes are natural and what unnatural. It LOOKS like we are are seeing fires, floods, earthquakes and volcanoes and hurricanes that suspiciously have unnatural patterns.

I chose to live in the time of Apocalypse and I choose the revealing of EVERY action humans and others have orchestrated against LIFE.

I see spin after spin competing for our attention.

IMO information processed by us with our spin matters. If I become aware of something, I imagine that God is here and can do anything. I imagine that all is well. I repudiate a catyclysm as described by the collapse of the La Palma shelf.

BUT, maybe I will take evasive action if I hear of a disaster headed my way? I have been warned to avoid many harms.

If I hear about something and I was strongly intuiting it is important, I try to choose as well as I can to respond. Would I go to the east coast now? Not for many reasons. Would I leave? Not sure because that is not my "reality tunnel". I realize that God can do anything and we can be warned for our benefit as ALL can. This may not be true but seems it works for me?


18 Aug, 2024 @ 16:15

Volcano warning in Spain: Scientists draft emergency plans to evacuate locals and tourists after ‘alarming’ and ‘intense’ days of seismic activity
by
Laurence Dollimore (https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2024/08/18/volcano-warning-in-spain-scientists-draft-emergency-plans-to-evacuate-locals-and-tourists-after-alarming-and-intense-seismic-activity/)

SPAIN is preparing for a volcanic eruption following a series of ‘alarming’ seismic movements, it has emerged.

The La Palma volcano, on the Canary Islands, is beginning to show activity again, setting off alarm bells among experts and locals.

It comes just three years after its last eruption caused almost €850 million in damages, forced a mass evacuation and destroyed countless homes.

The volcano, part of the northwestern ridge of Cumbre Vieja, last exploded in 2021, in an eruption that lasted 85 days and wreaked havoc.

According to El Español, seismic movements recorded in the past few weeks have generated concern among geologists.

Over the past few days, activity in the crater has increased in both frequency and intensity.

Scientists warn these movements could be a sign that magma is moving towards the surface again, which could trigger a new eruption.

It is impossible to predict when it would erupt but emergency plans are already being prepared to protect the public and minimise damage.

Reports say evacuation plans are being reviewed and updated and that protocols are in place to protect locals and tourists.

According to El Español, the scientific community is on ‘high alert’ and drills are already being carried out.

In predictive programming, we are subconsciously primed to expect the events UNLESS we actively repudiate it in our subconscious. Seems to me, the technology is available to collapse La Palma. I think it is possible that many of us are SOC members. The SOC is countering plans.

I am adding this here....

1825226896562389282