Contradictions in Physics and Quantum Mechanics

[kktari]

This is the first of a series of interviews with Qafshinra who has proposed a new paradigm that answers the fundamental questions in Physics and Quantum Mechanics.

In the episode, he talks about the current state of quantum mechanics and its paradoxes, lack of clear and scientific definitions for basic concepts such as Mass, Dimension, and frequency, and makes an introduction to his alternative theory, which has called the Origami Theory.

I have his book in PDF and his permission to send anyone who wants to know more.
Please let me know if you wish to have acopy of the book and I'll send it to you.

Click here to listen (https://d3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net/staging/2022-3-26/e27f51ea-226e-f34e-6d55-46f3f2c1d78c.wav)

You will be amazed!

[ExomatrixTV]

That was already known from the beginning ... that is why they can not find an unifying theory of everything ;)

[mizo]

This is the first of a series of interviews with Qafshinra who has proposed a new paradigm that answers the fundamental questions in Physics and Quantum Mechanics.

In the episode, he talks about the current state of quantum mechanics and its paradoxes, lack of clear and scientific definitions for basic concepts such as Mass, Dimension, and frequency, and makes an introduction to his alternative theory, which has called the Origami Theory.

I have his book in PDF and his permission to send anyone who wants to know more.
Please let me know if you wish to have acopy of the book and I'll send it to you.

Click here to listen (https://d3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net/staging/2022-3-26/e27f51ea-226e-f34e-6d55-46f3f2c1d78c.wav)

You will be amazed!

I'd like to read the book -thank you :)

[kktari]

Here is the link to the book.
https://standuphistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Origami-Book-Public-Version.pdf

[Johnnycomelately]

Here is the link to the book.
https://standuphistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Origami-Book-Public-Version.pdf

This is fascinating. I have read the abstract and introduction, and look forward to reading more. Thank you!

[samsdice]

I've read a bit of the book and there's some extremely funny bits in it. Lots of chuckles :-) Thanks....

[RunningDeer]

Thank you, kktari. http://paula.avalonlibrary.net/smilies/wave-hi.gif
[URL="https://standuphistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Origami-Book-Public-Version.pdf"]Direct link correction (Here is the link to the book.
https://standuphistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Origami-Book-Public-Version.pdf).

[Mike Gorman]

Small editorial gripe here, why do people write such long paragraphs? The simple effort of breaking your thoughts into nice digestible, logical blocks gives the reader a much easier time.
This might seem quibbling, or trivial to some but this one minor correction to how you present your ideas can make an enormous difference to the reception.
Rant over.

[Bubu]

Small editorial gripe here, why do people write such long paragraphs? The simple effort of breaking your thoughts into nice digestible, logical blocks gives the reader a much easier time.
This might seem quibbling, or trivial to some but this one minor correction to how you present your ideas can make an enormous difference to the reception.
Rant over.
Now thats a good rule and npn just a THEORY.
Truth dwells in splicity wjile deciet hide in complexity. I did not read the book I ve have read a few in my lifetime all of them a waste of time except one

[kktari]

Thank you all for your replies and feedback. This is the link to the next episode of my interview. In this episode Qafshinra talsks about the law and order in the universe and intelligent design:

Click here to listen (https://d3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net/staging/2022-3-26/90abc67f-fc2c-8058-28a7-6e0493210608.wav)

¤=[Post Update]=¤


Small editorial gripe here, why do people write such long paragraphs? The simple effort of breaking your thoughts into nice digestible, logical blocks gives the reader a much easier time.
This might seem quibbling, or trivial to some but this one minor correction to how you present your ideas can make an enormous difference to the reception.
Rant over.

I agree with you 100%. I personally started editing the long paragraphs (with his permission).

[shaberon]

Interesting. Going from the abstract, it is approximately the same thing I wrote thirty years ago as a paper. Perhaps not identical, but similar.


This one sounds kind of axiomatic, un-proofing and re-proofing.


I have a few reactions on the surface of it.

Firstly, I don't believe you can get the ultimate answers with physical measuring devices. That is all physics can do, tell you how to measure something. Here they have said Time is the only possible measurement (dimension). My view is that the only realistic measuring apparatus is the human organism.

Our yoga view is exactly this, that Time is quantized or "digitized"--which is defined in physics as the smallest energy transfer that can be measured--which takes place in something like 10 ^-34 seconds. This is the Planck scale and so if it is physically significant, it has to do with Black Body Radiation (i. e. light).

Like the superposition of the electron, we say that consciousness re-creates the cosmos with every tick of that quantum, which is the Creator of most religions, except the goal of yoga is Brahman, which has two forms, Time, and No Time.

Apparent motion that is perceived and perhaps subsequently measured by instruments, etc., is really just changing states of consciousness in the quantum sea of Time.


Secondly we have a pretty coherent picture that Isaac Newton was originally a Natural Scientist, which includes, among other things, Astrology, and so it would be a type of science related to consciousness.


This can be shown to historically have been paved over by "vested interests" many times. Calculus as Newton developed it was used to replace matrices as used by Leibiniz, which were involved with something like twenty kinds of force equations. Now, most people are just given the result, that there are Four Forces having calculus equations.

Of course, those forces are contradictory, as the subject of the book appears to say. And so Maxwell's quarternions are posted somewhere in General Science I think, and, it is this vein which Tesla was working in. That would seem to be at least a hint that the "standard model" might be inadequate.

It is approximately close, but, for instance, a black hole cannot even be observed. You cannot measure it. Tectonic plate drift is unobservable because it is too slow for even generations of scientists to show. 96% of "mass" is unobservable.


Newton's spectrum is actually a special case.

And so Isaac Newton was a Natural Scientist, but, at that time, there came to be a new institution of Materialism, which is mainly based in ignoring consciousness, until eventually getting around to telling you maybe it is some random incident in a lucky recipe of electro-chemical primordial soup. If you want to talk about it, go to someone who is more like a medical doctor.

The equivalent of consciousness at that time was the old institution wherein Bishop Ussher had recently announced that the world had been created not much more than 3,000 B. C., and there was widespread belief that the devil was in the telescope, and so on. If you did not admire their views, you could wind up in the stocks, pillory, boot, or something.

Newton was very much the end of the line of alchemy and astrology and so on, and you can see what comes from universities from the 1700s on.


I don't know if that is where this book is going, but that is what comes off the top of my head from what sounds like very similar subjects.




Edit: a few pages in, it strikes me as odd that something which may "re-write Physics" axiomatically accepts the Big Bang. In other words you have to argue this against Steady State. Also, it is re-defininf mass as non-existent, or, as the result of Time x Gravity.


Here we would say ultimately there is no "solid mass", but, there are the presence of electrical forces. This is the perpetual actor in a Steady State environment.

Does this go on to address these issues?

[kktari]

Interesting. Going from the abstract, it is approximately the same thing I wrote thirty years ago as a paper. Perhaps not identical, but similar.


This one sounds kind of axiomatic, un-proofing and re-proofing.


I have a few reactions on the surface of it.

Firstly, I don't believe you can get the ultimate answers with physical measuring devices. That is all physics can do, tell you how to measure something. Here they have said Time is the only possible measurement (dimension). My view is that the only realistic measuring apparatus is the human organism.

Our yoga view is exactly this, that Time is quantized or "digitized"--which is defined in physics as the smallest energy transfer that can be measured--which takes place in something like 10 ^-34 seconds. This is the Planck scale and so if it is physically significant, it has to do with Black Body Radiation (i. e. light).

Like the superposition of the electron, we say that consciousness re-creates the cosmos with every tick of that quantum, which is the Creator of most religions, except the goal of yoga is Brahman, which has two forms, Time, and No Time.

Apparent motion that is perceived and perhaps subsequently measured by instruments, etc., is really just changing states of consciousness in the quantum sea of Time.


Secondly we have a pretty coherent picture that Isaac Newton was originally a Natural Scientist, which includes, among other things, Astrology, and so it would be a type of science related to consciousness.


This can be shown to historically have been paved over by "vested interests" many times. Calculus as Newton developed it was used to replace matrices as used by Leibiniz, which were involved with something like twenty kinds of force equations. Now, most people are just given the result, that there are Four Forces having calculus equations.

Of course, those forces are contradictory, as the subject of the book appears to say. And so Maxwell's quarternions are posted somewhere in General Science I think, and, it is this vein which Tesla was working in. That would seem to be at least a hint that the "standard model" might be inadequate.

It is approximately close, but, for instance, a black hole cannot even be observed. You cannot measure it. Tectonic plate drift is unobservable because it is too slow for even generations of scientists to show. 96% of "mass" is unobservable.


Newton's spectrum is actually a special case.

And so Isaac Newton was a Natural Scientist, but, at that time, there came to be a new institution of Materialism, which is mainly based in ignoring consciousness, until eventually getting around to telling you maybe it is some random incident in a lucky recipe of electro-chemical primordial soup. If you want to talk about it, go to someone who is more like a medical doctor.

The equivalent of consciousness at that time was the old institution wherein Bishop Ussher had recently announced that the world had been created not much more than 3,000 B. C., and there was widespread belief that the devil was in the telescope, and so on. If you did not admire their views, you could wind up in the stocks, pillory, boot, or something.

Newton was very much the end of the line of alchemy and astrology and so on, and you can see what comes from universities from the 1700s on.


I don't know if that is where this book is going, but that is what comes off the top of my head from what sounds like very similar subjects.




Edit: a few pages in, it strikes me as odd that something which may "re-write Physics" axiomatically accepts the Big Bang. In other words you have to argue this against Steady State. Also, it is re-defininf mass as non-existent, or, as the result of Time x Gravity.


Here we would say ultimately there is no "solid mass", but, there are the presence of electrical forces. This is the perpetual actor in a Steady State environment.

Does this go on to address these issues?

I forwarded your post to him. I'll post it here as soon as I hear back. Thank you

[kktari]

Interesting. Going from the abstract, it is approximately the same thing I wrote thirty years ago as a paper. Perhaps not identical, but similar.


This one sounds kind of axiomatic, un-proofing and re-proofing.


I have a few reactions on the surface of it.

Firstly, I don't believe you can get the ultimate answers with physical measuring devices. That is all physics can do, tell you how to measure something. Here they have said Time is the only possible measurement (dimension). My view is that the only realistic measuring apparatus is the human organism.

Our yoga view is exactly this, that Time is quantized or "digitized"--which is defined in physics as the smallest energy transfer that can be measured--which takes place in something like 10 ^-34 seconds. This is the Planck scale and so if it is physically significant, it has to do with Black Body Radiation (i. e. light).

Like the superposition of the electron, we say that consciousness re-creates the cosmos with every tick of that quantum, which is the Creator of most religions, except the goal of yoga is Brahman, which has two forms, Time, and No Time.

Apparent motion that is perceived and perhaps subsequently measured by instruments, etc., is really just changing states of consciousness in the quantum sea of Time.


Secondly we have a pretty coherent picture that Isaac Newton was originally a Natural Scientist, which includes, among other things, Astrology, and so it would be a type of science related to consciousness.


This can be shown to historically have been paved over by "vested interests" many times. Calculus as Newton developed it was used to replace matrices as used by Leibiniz, which were involved with something like twenty kinds of force equations. Now, most people are just given the result, that there are Four Forces having calculus equations.

Of course, those forces are contradictory, as the subject of the book appears to say. And so Maxwell's quarternions are posted somewhere in General Science I think, and, it is this vein which Tesla was working in. That would seem to be at least a hint that the "standard model" might be inadequate.

It is approximately close, but, for instance, a black hole cannot even be observed. You cannot measure it. Tectonic plate drift is unobservable because it is too slow for even generations of scientists to show. 96% of "mass" is unobservable.


Newton's spectrum is actually a special case.

And so Isaac Newton was a Natural Scientist, but, at that time, there came to be a new institution of Materialism, which is mainly based in ignoring consciousness, until eventually getting around to telling you maybe it is some random incident in a lucky recipe of electro-chemical primordial soup. If you want to talk about it, go to someone who is more like a medical doctor.

The equivalent of consciousness at that time was the old institution wherein Bishop Ussher had recently announced that the world had been created not much more than 3,000 B. C., and there was widespread belief that the devil was in the telescope, and so on. If you did not admire their views, you could wind up in the stocks, pillory, boot, or something.

Newton was very much the end of the line of alchemy and astrology and so on, and you can see what comes from universities from the 1700s on.


I don't know if that is where this book is going, but that is what comes off the top of my head from what sounds like very similar subjects.




Edit: a few pages in, it strikes me as odd that something which may "re-write Physics" axiomatically accepts the Big Bang. In other words you have to argue this against Steady State. Also, it is re-defininf mass as non-existent, or, as the result of Time x Gravity.


Here we would say ultimately there is no "solid mass", but, there are the presence of electrical forces. This is the perpetual actor in a Steady State environment.

Does this go on to address these issues?

I forwarded your post to him. I'll post it here as soon as I hear back. Thank you

Here is the response:
"I am glad that you had thought about a perhaps similar idea. Although, what you have to remember is that :

1- I have developed this model in its entirety and with all mathematical and physical equations and in a scientific format to be considered as a new model.
2- What I have shared is the "simple English" version.

I strongly recommend you study the work and let me know if you have any questions.

Last but not the lease. If you pay more attention, or listen to my interview, I do not accept Big Bang.

https://d3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net/staging/2022-3-28/99f945ce-e50f-bfec-d497-184bbecc6c3e.mp3

https://d3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net/staging/2022-3-28/a435266f-5030-956e-3a59-e282ba6a63d1.mp3


All the Best,

[shaberon]

1- I have developed this model in its entirety and with all mathematical and physical equations and in a scientific format to be considered as a new model.
2- What I have shared is the "simple English" version.

I strongly recommend you study the work and let me know if you have any questions.

Last but not the lease. If you pay more attention, or listen to my interview, I do not accept Big Bang.


Ok, that is a bit...vague...and so we start by presenting the Big Bang, to unravel it later?

As Mike Gorman said the style of the text is difficult to handle.

Science interests me, and I can raise dozens of points already from this forum and using other websites to present them.

And so this is a bit of peer review, about how you can generate an audience...it needs to be sharpened.

The prelude is very interesting, that there is one dimension, being time. But say, for example, a Table of Contents, rather than just Chapter One and block text? So I could just glance and see something like Chapter Six, the Big Bang just doesn't work, Chapter Seven, Why EM is derived from gravity...that sort of thing would be more useful than to be recommended to go through the whole thing and ask later.



On a general readership basis, we can easily get the related nature of Planck Time with a few snippets from Space (https://www.space.com/what-is-the-planck-time):

Planck length is equal to the Planck time multiplied by the speed of light.

Because the Planck time is so impractically small, it was largely ignored by scientists prior to the 1950s, according to K. A. Tomilin of the Moscow Institute for the History of Science and Technology. At best it was considered an interesting curiosity with no real physical significance. Then, when physicists started looking for a “theory of everything” that would encompass both gravity and quantum mechanics, they realized that the Planck time might have enormous significance after all.

The key lies in the fact that the Planck time, along with the other Planck units, incorporates both the gravitational constant G and Planck’s constant h, which is central to quantum theory.

...is there any mass for which the Schwarzschild radius is exactly equal to the Compton wavelength? It turns out there is – and it’s the Planck mass, for which those two parameters, one from quantum theory and one from general relativity, both equal the Planck length.

Is this just a coincidence, or does it mean that gravitational and quantum effects really do start to overlap at the Planck scale?

Some scientists, such as Diego Meschini of Jyvaskyla University in Finland, remain skeptical, but the general consensus is that Planck units really do play a key role in connecting these two areas of physics. One possibility is that spacetime itself is quantized at the level of a Planck length and Planck time. If this is true, then the fabric of spacetime, when looked at on that scale, would appear “chunky” rather than smoothly continuous.

But it’s widely believed that, given a better understanding of quantum gravity, we’d find that prior to the Planck time gravity was also merged into the other forces. It was only at the Planck time, around 5 × 10^-44 seconds after the Big Bang, that gravity became the separate force we see today.



So you will notice I personally mis-stated Planck Time by ten billion powers too much. Someone should have seen that. But we can also reverse that last quote: During the first unit of Planck Time, there was only one force, and afterwards, EM and Nuclear separated from Gravity. Then if I frame that with language that says they are only changed appearances of, but not different from or other than Gravity, it sounds like that would be the subject that is being pursued here.

We see there is a "general consensus" that the Time Quantum probably is extremely fundamental.

Vacuum Energy has been known as the Casimir Effect (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect) since the 1940s, the principle of spontaneous creation and destruction of particle--anti-particle pairs, and since then it has been measured more sensitively, not discovered in the 2000s.

[Vicus]

First-Of-Its-Kind Image Shows Single Lithium Atoms Turning Into Quantum Waves
The approach could be used for even more peculiar systems.

https://assets.iflscience.com/assets/articleNo/73955/aImg/75823/dots-l.webp
Each red dot is a lithium atom close to the absolute zero.

Particles and waves are one and the same in our universe. This challenge to the expected binary is everywhere, but it becomes crucial at the quantum level. The wave-particle duality has been studied for over a century with a myriad of experiments, but researchers have now done something different: They have captured it on camera.

In a first-of-its-kind image, researchers were able to capture the clear moment when individual atoms begin to act like "wave packets", their results shown in a pre-print paper that has yet to undergo peer review. The equations that govern this have been known since the early days of quantum mechanics, so the team knew exactly how the system would change. The challenge was in the imaging technique.

Speaking to IFLScience, article authors Dr Tarik Yefsah, Joris Verstraten, Dr Tim de Jongh, and Dr Bruno Peaudecerf have compared their imaging techniques to pixels of a regular digital camera. The lithium atoms are first cooled down to near absolute zero using lasers. They are trapped in an optical lattice but given enough time to turn into a localized wave packet.

The optical lattice is turned off so that the atom-wave can expand before being turned on again, pushing the packet back into the particle state. The trapped atom fluoresces and this can be recorded by the microscope system. The method is repeated many times so that the researchers can sample the whole wavefunction density.

“Wave packets are one of the most elemental manifestations of wave-particle duality. Despite this, surprisingly few experiments were dedicated to measuring the expansion of a single-particle wave packet directly and with a good resolution, which is what we do in the article,” the authors have told IFLScience. “Besides, because their behavior is well understood, they make a great test object to benchmark the microscopy technique that we developed: by recovering the expected behavior, we can confirm that the imaging method itself does not introduce any significant bias.”

Picking a setup that is theoretically well understood helped them showcase the robustness of this technique to provide views of quantum behaviors without majorly affecting them. In quantum mechanics, the observer is after all part of the experiment. The next step is using it for states that are less understood.

“Using the imaging technique that we developed and tested in the article, we are planning to look directly at the microscopic properties of strongly interacting fermionic systems. The behavior of those systems is much less understood than the wave packets that we studied in the article,” the authors continued. “This could for instance improve our understanding of remarkable states of matter, such as extremely dense neutron stars, or the plasma of elementary particles found shortly after the Big Bang.”

https://www.iflscience.com/first-of-its-kind-image-shows-single-lithium-atoms-turning-into-quantum-waves-73955

[Neptune7]

Hello Kktari.

First off, thank you for the great series of interviews and many thanks to Qafshinra for the effort to create his theory. I have listened to the first three interviews and have a few specific questions.

1. What creates time, gravity, and the Intelligent Designer in this theory?

2. Can Qafshinra's theory provide a step by step explanation for the i) mechanics of cell division, ii) the life like behaviours of Plasma, or iii)Ice Flowers (http://www.jrcarter.net/ice/flowers/).

I pick these three phenomenon just as examples of phenomenon we experience in our Universe.

Thanks in advance,

N7