Planned Legal Evidence for a Captive World by 2030

[aoibhghaire]

This urgent information should be shared as an education to those people, young and old, who may wonder why is there world in this state. They need to know there world is on the brink as a captive world by a hidden minority operating over generations.

There is substantial legal evidence to demonstrate this has been a 150 year project to capture the world through a legal series of loopholes since the 1880s. This has resulted in planning wars, creating pandemics, medical take overs, vaccines, mind control and finally full control of the world by 2030. The current final authority to legally orchestrate and militarise these policies over sovereign states and there citizens is the WHO.

Hidden legal framework turns over all national authority to WHO and obliterates human rights, worldwide.

Katherine Watts excellent overall summary video of how the bio situation has been militarized:

TrdcWhjm9RYX

Her substack has meticulously detailed info on all the specific national and international laws that have resulted in this situation.

It's not just the USA, though she gives the most detail about the US legal framework.

Her substack is: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com

She has an "orientation" post for new readers to guide them to the most important posts to read first:

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/orientation-for-new-readers

[aoibhghaire]

Catherine Watt describes the importance of acting LOCALLY, taking whatever kind of legal action or other tactic makes sense, depending on an individual's unique interests and abilities. It's not about everyone or a group agreeing on a single best strategy. [sorry I can't find that link]

Her most recent summary (detailed list or legislation etc. starting from 1900) and ending with the shocking implication of these:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program

"Summary:

There are no actions that can be legally classified as crimes or civil torts; there are no medical battery or homicide victims, or plaintiffs; and there are no medical batterers or murderers. Because legally, nothing has been done, and no one has done anything, to anyone else.
The recursive loop can be infinite, as covered countermeasures are developed, authorized and deployed, through HHS Secretary EUA declarations, as treatments for complications from prior countermeasures."


This post describes why Katherine Watt sees most government officials as imposters and shams: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/on-trumps-role-and-secret-military

Katherine Watt's long list of SOME of the names of people involved, where there is already evidence to take possible legal action (e.g., treason):

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/war-criminals

She says Freedom of Information Act requests (FOIA) are useful even if they are denied:

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/draft-freedom-of-information-act

"Rejections and denials are still useful for exposing the globalist killing program to the public; and for mobilizing True Congress and state, local and tribal governments to stop complying with unlawful military orders as part of an illegal war, seize the stockpiled mRNA/LNP vials from interstate commerce, pharmacies and clinics as evidence, and prosecute the war criminals."


https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/faked-clinical-trials-and-real-world

at the end she says she thinks treason charges might be most effective:

"This is why I think that fraud charges (corporate fraud, clinical trial fraud, consumer fraud) are not going to get anywhere: because all the things the US government, Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson have done that would have been crimes (fraud, homicide, medical battery) have been legalized.

This is also why I think treason charges against sitting and former Congress members, presidents and Health and Human Services secretaries might get somewhere, and better match the magnitude of the horrors they've deliberately planned and unleashed together."

[mountain_jim]

https://lawyerlisa.substack.com/p/eu-parliament-mandatory-chip-implants?r=bilal&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

EU PARLIAMENT: Mandatory Chip Implants for EU CITIZENS published STUDY

The EU wants to TAG its citizens like CATTLE AND CAN START MAY 2023

LawyerLisa
Jan 20
The EU has been studying mandatory chip implants since 2017 and has an in depth published study examining the technology and the barriers needed to overcome in order to chip their population.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7092d29b-4001-4c5f-b7c0-3a1d4e1de3ed_615x680.jpeg

ORIGINAL PUBLICATION (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/34cb538d-58b7-11e8-ab41-01aa75ed71a1/language-en)

The publication is titled:

DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY The Use of Chip Implants for Workers

The Abstract of the Study reads

Abstract This paper briefly explains the technology of RFID chip implants; explores current applications; and considers legal, ethical, health, and security issues relating to their potential use in the workplace.

WHO PREPARED IT

“This document was prepared by Milieu/IOM Ltd at the request of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs of the European Parliament”

WHO WANTED IT

“This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL).

WHO AUTHORED IT

“AUTHOR(S) Richard GRAVELING, IOM Consulting Ltd, Edinburgh, UK. Thomas WINSKI, IOM Consulting Ltd, Edinburgh, UK. Ken DIXON, IOM Consulting Ltd Contributions by: David CABRELLI, School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (legal) Marc DESMULLIEZ, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh (technical) Murdo MACDONALD, Society, Religion and Technology Project, Church of Scotland, Edinburgh (ethical) Peer review: Hilary Cowie, IOM Consulting Ltd, Edinburgh, UK. Joanne Crawford, IOM Consulting Ltd, Edinburgh, UK. Claire Dupont, Milieu Ltd, Brussels RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Stefan SCHULZ EDITORIAL ASSISTANT”


LEGAL ISSUES IDENTIFIED

“Legal Issues Although other legislation is relevant, the main legal challenges to the compulsory use of RFID chips in the workplace would seem to derive from data protection and human rights legislation. “

“Even where RFID chip use was truly voluntary this legislation would still be relevant, especially in respect of data protection. In the case of voluntary applications, it would be necessary to ensure that the use was genuinely voluntary and that no disadvantage was seen to accrue to those individuals who declined to have a chip implanted or that any pressures (direct or indirect) were exerted on those invited to participate. “

“Ethical Concerns In an overlap with legal arguments, ethical concerns stem in part from Articles 1 and 3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU relating to the inviolability of human dignity and the human body.”

WHO IHS AMENDMENTS

The benefit for globalists who are clearly bent on micro control of its citizens, are the WHO IHS amendments and/or Pandemic Treaty. The IHHC met in January to formalize changes to the WHO regulations and these could be approved by May 2023..

These amendments WILL permit the suspension of Articles 1 and 3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. Thereby overcoming the legal and ethical considerations that mandatory chipping of EU residents would otherwise have as barriers to this horrible unethical immoral network-branding its citizens. No doubt the chipping will work with the vaccine passport they intend to roll out. I posted this video on another substack. But I am seriously hopping this gets shared to Europeans who are not yet my readers.

< more at link >