I Think Faster Than Light Travel is Possible. Here's Why

[ExomatrixTV]

I Think Faster Than Light Travel is Possible. Here's Why:

9-jIplX6Wjw


00:00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-jIplX6Wjw&t=0s) Intro
01:51 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-jIplX6Wjw&t=111s) The Speed of Light as Limit
06:12 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-jIplX6Wjw&t=372s) The Speed of Light as Barrier
12:44 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-jIplX6Wjw&t=764s) Time Travel Paradoxes
20:47 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-jIplX6Wjw&t=1247s) Quantum Gravity and Summary
21:54 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-jIplX6Wjw&t=1314s) Learn Physics on Brilliant

https://www.cccb.org/rcs_gene/sabine.jpg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabine_Hossenfelder)


Sabine Hossenfelder (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabine_Hossenfelder)

Science and technology updates and summaries. No hype, no spin, no tip-toeing around inconvenient truths. News each Wednesday, new topical video each Saturday. Sabine Hossenfelder has a PhD in Physics.

She is author of the books "Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray (https://www.amazon.com/Lost-Math-Beauty-Physics-Astray/dp/0465094252)" (Basic Books, 2018) and "Existential Physics: A Scientist's Guide to Life's Biggest Questions (https://www.amazon.com/Existential-Physics-Scientists-Biggest-Questions/dp/1984879456)" (Viking, 2022).


youtube.com/@SabineHossenfelder/videos (https://www.youtube.com/@SabineHossenfelder/videos) :dog: (75,569,179+ views total)

[Mike Gorman]

There is indeed a persistent prejudice among the equivalent of "Normies" among the physics community, people such as Tyson deGrasse for instance who believe Einstein is irrefutable and absolute, these are the slaves to 'consensus' - the thing is, every major breakthrough we have had in Science has been against the 'consensus' of the times, think about it.
Our old friend Arthur M Young was such a scientist, he was among the first qualified people to examine Relativity way back in the late 1920's at Princeton university, they had to bring in a specialist mathematician to construct the course of study for Arthur Young, he was truly a brilliant man of enormous ability, anyway Arthur M Young grew to dislike Einstein's 'laws', and his mathematical limitations - I am certain Arthur Young would approve of this push to exceed the speed of light, or super luminary velocities: I just want to say that there are no true limits in the universe, only those of understanding and limits placed by the pride/ego of consensus science advocates.

[Jamie]

Gosh, at the moment I really feel dumb as I only comprehended about 50% of that (EDIT - That's a total lie, more like 20%!). :facepalm:

I'm probably 10 years out of date, but I always considered the only way to travel "faster than light" was an ability to compress space by some means.
Thus if we were only travelling 100MPH, but the space in front of our travel was warped (compressed), then we would in effect travel a shorter distance to our destination, and thus end up there faster than light.

[s7e6e]

The reason this actor called Einstein has been pushed so aggressively by the mainstream is because, unlike Tesla/Bohr/Maxwell, his physics promote taps on energy streams which are misleadingly described as finite and limited.

[Gwin Ru]

...

... check this:

...

... "Speed of Light"... well, apparently, it's not constant to start with...

Forbidden Science (https://www.sott.net/article/478903-Forbidden-Science)

Arkadiusz Jadczyk
Ark Jadczyk Blogspot (https://ark-jadczyk.blogspot.com/2023/03/forbidden-science.html)
Fri, 31 Mar 2023 04:01 UTC

[...]

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

I Think Faster Than Light Travel is Possible. Here's Why:

9-jIplX6Wjw

[sorry in advance, I'm in rant mode today it seems]

Her opening statement gets me. It gets me every time "they" make it - "they" being the mainstream scientific establishment.


In the last year there's been a lot of talk about Unexplained Aerial Phenomena, formerly known as UFOs.

No, still and always known as UFOs. "Unexplained Aerial Phenomena", or UAPs, is shill-speak my friend. It's used only by political, military, and corporate shills, whose job it is to control and therefore subvert the narrative by in effect glossing over 70+ years of UFO research, data and history in order to re-write it with their own heavily watered down version.


I don't actually believe any of those are of extraterrestrial origin...

Which means you've spent precisely zero hours or even minutes researching the subject.


...because as I said we're just too boring for aliens to bother visiting us.

Earth boring?? Humans boring?? I don't even know where to start with that statement.


Then again, what do I know...?

Evidently, not a lot.

[Gwin Ru]

...

... I understand the "rant" so let's chill out a bit and consider the point of contention with the "UFO" appellation... well, it's a misnomer... and the misnaming comes with the term "Flying"... why?

Well, we don't know if one of those "UFO" is using air flows around its hull to maintain a fix position with respect to ground... see? Is it "hovering" like an hawk using ascendant air flows or is it "floating" like a balloon or an "orb"? Is it a holograph that's neither floating nor "flying"/hovering?

When transitioning from air to water, does it switch from "flying" to "swimming"? Since observations of such phenomena is rare for underwater sightings and non-existent for underground, that leaves us with "Aerial"

Then we could analyze the term "Object" in a similar manner... well, a holograph isn't an "object" per se... not like a meteorite hitting ground leaving craters and material, physical shunks of outer space material. So that leaves us with "phenomena" as an all encompassing term.

Now, "Unidentified" well that too is a misnomer because it refers to a phenomenon that's observable and therefore identifiable... and some individuals do know what, where, when, who, why... but is kept a mystery for most of us so that the phenomena remain in the domain of "Non-categorized" phenomena.

Hope this helps?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Hope this helps?

In fact yes it does. Thank you. It helps me clarify the issue and double-down even more.

It's nothing to do with the etymological elements of "Unidentified Flying Object". Nothing whatsoever.

The motivation was to steer inquisitive "norms" from the inconvenient historical reality of UFOs and onto a new, pre-arranged and carefully constructed narrative - one controlled no longer by UFO researchers but the Military Industrial Complex themselves.

This is a rebranding exercise. Because to them UFO is a dirty word. Its redolent of "conspiracy theory".

And they cannot have anything to do with conspiracy theories can they! So they invented UAP as the new "politically correct" term. The goal, to distance themselves from the stink that they created by decades and decades of covering up the truth and LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH.

[Ernie Nemeth]

I think faster than light sometimes but I don't like to travel, I'm a homebody. haha

It might be possible to tweak some meaning out of looking at light from its stationary component of matter. What does it mean when light slams into an atom and is absorbed? Does it lose its momentum? Or is there an exchange that takes place?

I personally think that the speed of light has to do with the thing Einstein eradicated from the lexicon with his general theory - the ether. It is the medium that determines the characteristics of any phenomenon. Since the ether is completely disregarded, could it be that the medium can be altered to alter the speed of light? Thing is, the ether has proven very illusive. It is not only hard to measure, it is hard to prove it exists.

[Dreamer148]

There is indeed a persistent prejudice among the equivalent of "Normies" among the physics community, people such as Tyson deGrasse for instance who believe Einstein is irrefutable and absolute, these are the slaves to 'consensus' - the thing is, every major breakthrough we have had in Science has been against the 'consensus' of the times, think about it.
Our old friend Arthur M Young was such a scientist, he was among the first qualified people to examine Relativity way back in the late 1920's at Princeton university, they had to bring in a specialist mathematician to construct the course of study for Arthur Young, he was truly a brilliant man of enormous ability, anyway Arthur M Young grew to dislike Einstein's 'laws', and his mathematical limitations - I am certain Arthur Young would approve of this push to exceed the speed of light, or super luminary velocities: I just want to say that there are no true limits in the universe, only those of understanding and limits placed by the pride/ego of consensus science advocates.

Einstein was brilliant, but the more you study his work the duller he becomes. For example, the much vaunted mass to energy equation to end all equations E=mc2. Does this look similar to the proven formula for kinetic energy, E= 1/2mv2? Take away the 1/2 (that looks untidy) and substitute a known value c (speed of light) and viola you have Einstein's sexy, but not so brilliant formula. Has anyone actually verified this formula?
In contrast, Tesla said all power came from the either, the vacuum, the void. Sounds so ridiculous my gut tells me he may have been right.

[Mike Gorman]

The famous equation is pretty solid, we know that matter is essentially bonded energy, the 'mass' in matter resides in the nucleus of protons/Neutrons, and electrons orbiting in a field, the strong force of attraction when released by a critical event releases all of that bonded energy in one almighty 'whoosh' , a small quantity of matter represents a massive quanta of energy, fair enough and thanks for nuclear weapons...but the absolute space/time curvature and the 'sphere' that Einstein proposes being the shape of our universe? I prefer the Torus that Arthur Young suggests, the eternal movement of the universe up the middle and out again, but what do I know, to quote the young lady.

[ozmirage]

TETRAHEDRON MOJO
. . .
Many many moons ago - - -

While working at a defense contractor, we were piddling around with a 3D drafting tool, and imparted multidimensional spins to various objects. It was fun watching said objects tumble about. I got bored and left.

After some time, my friend began to spout various obscenities, and called me over. His object was a tetrahedron, on the screen.
He was incensed because he programmed it to spin on all four axes, and it just sat there.

After debugging the code, step by step, he found that nothing was wrong.
An object spun simultaneously on all four axes of a tetrahedron cancels out all motion - in short, a standing wave.

Thus one can imagine energy vortices, spun on 4 tetrahedronal axes, making up the thing called “matter” - a standing wave of energy. No matter how fast you spin (or add heat), it's stable. But if it "falls apart" it becomes radiant energy.

The “next step” is to “lock” the vortices to this space-time continuum. If you slightly distort the position of any one of the axis, it may impart a “pressure” to return to equilibrium (lock), thus generating a linear space drive.

Further detuning from space-time makes the vessel go inertialess (massless) in this reference, allowing for FTL velocities without violating Physical laws. And with the interference with photon-matter interaction, it would "disappear".
(One may note that “UFO” saucers often show three hemispheres in the base - an ideal location for 3 adjustable toroids to generate vortices - with the 4th toroid embedded in the circular craft’s disk shape.)
. . .
The transformation of energy to matter (standing wave) and vice versa, is controllable via adjustments of 8-space on the 4 axes (dimensions) of the space-time tetrahedron matrix.
. . .
DIMENSION - a measure of spatial extent.

The notion that there are only three dimensions, 90 degrees apart, may actually be a mistake in perception. As one can demonstrate by mapping angles upon a curved surface (like a sphere), one can make an equilateral ‘right triangle’ with three 90 degree angles... totaling 270 degrees. (Plane geometry limits triangles to 180 degrees)

If one uses the axes of a tetrahedron - which also correspond to bonds on a carbon atom - there are four dimensions or measurement references - that have higher order measurements (spin velocity and direction). {see: Octonion math}

Once detuned and inertialess, there is no bar to superluminal velocity, traveling through hoober space via gumpherhooberpelt drive. [just kidding]

It may also explain the strange coincidences located at 19.5 N/S latitude on spinning celestial objects... The points coincide with the base of a tetrahedron inscribed within the sphere.
(Extinct volcano at Olympus Mons, on Mars; Great Spot on Jupiter; "hot spots" on Earth's crust like the Mauna Kea volcano, Deccan plateau, and the Bermuda Triangle; Dark spot on Neptune; sunspots on the Sun; and so on.)

The Galactic Emperor reminded me to point out that there are no such things as extraterrestrials nor UFOs, and all of this is just a figment of your undigested dinner. . . (wink, wink, nod, nod)

[ExomatrixTV]

The Leading Theory-Based Rejectionist Argument (which we all know)

The speed of light is a universal upper limit. Distances between stars range from 4.3 light years to Alpha Centauri (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Centauri) to a hundred thousand light years across the Milky Way galaxy to millions of light years between galaxies. These facts are incompatible with tens of thousands of apparent visitations


Comment on the Argument

I agree completely that if the only way to get from star system A to star system B is to travel at sublight speed, this rules out frequent visitation. You might expect a visit once every ten thousand years (to cite a number I believe Carl Sagan once pulled out of his hat) even if the galaxy is teeming with civilizations. The questions is, are there conceivable alternatives to slogging through space? Maybe.


The Alternatives Worth Considering

The speed-of-light limit only applies to motion through four-dimensional spacetime. Perhaps wormholes are possible. That is a concept for which Kip Thorne gets the credit (or the blame). It is an old, but still valid, argument for how traveling through vast distances might be circumvented. Perhaps spacetime itself can be stretched as proposed by the relativist Miguel Alcubierre. There is no speed-of-light limit to spacetime stretching. After all, spacetime beyond the Hubble horizon must be receding from us at v>c. The Alcubierre “warp drive” (Class. Quant. Grav., 11-5, L73-L77, 1994 (http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0009013)) shows that spacetime warping and stretching around a bubble of flat spacetime is mathematically consistent with general relativity. This sounds promising, but the energy requirements seem to be impossible, which is of course not a good thing. Modern superstring and M-brane theory imply the existence of numerous additional dimensions. Recent work indicates that these additional dimensions may be much larger than the Planck scale. The article “The Universe’s Unseen Dimensions” by Nima Arkani-Hamed, Savas Dimopoulos and Georgi Dvali in the August 2000 issue of Scientific American, for example, is a good summary of some current thinking on additional spatial dimensions as large as a millimeter: “Our whole universe may sit on a membrane floating in a higher-dimensional space. Extra dimensions might explain why gravity is so weak and could be the key to unifying all the forces of nature.” Perhaps it is possible to lift off the membrane-universe constituting our four-dimensional spacetime, move in one of the additional dimensions where speed-of-light limits may not apply, and reenter our membrane-universe very far away. All of this is speculation of course, but it is worth noting that disappearing in place, changing shape or sometimes jumping discontinuously from location to location is frequently reported in UFO observations. Such behavior could conceivably be associated with motion into and out of a perpendicular dimension.


Possible Conclusion

The "speed-of-light limit" argument against the UFO phenomenon is a theory-based one, but even without suspending the laws of relativity, it may not be valid. We simply know too little about other possibilities to rule them out, and for that reason the appropriate thing to do is to suspend judgment based on this argument.


source
(https://www.ufoskeptic.org/light/)

[Ernie Nemeth]

There is indeed a persistent prejudice among the equivalent of "Normies" among the physics community, people such as Tyson deGrasse for instance who believe Einstein is irrefutable and absolute, these are the slaves to 'consensus' - the thing is, every major breakthrough we have had in Science has been against the 'consensus' of the times, think about it.
Our old friend Arthur M Young was such a scientist, he was among the first qualified people to examine Relativity way back in the late 1920's at Princeton university, they had to bring in a specialist mathematician to construct the course of study for Arthur Young, he was truly a brilliant man of enormous ability, anyway Arthur M Young grew to dislike Einstein's 'laws', and his mathematical limitations - I am certain Arthur Young would approve of this push to exceed the speed of light, or super luminary velocities: I just want to say that there are no true limits in the universe, only those of understanding and limits placed by the pride/ego of consensus science advocates.

Einstein was brilliant, but the more you study his work the duller he becomes. For example, the much vaunted mass to energy equation to end all equations E=mc2. Does this look similar to the proven formula for kinetic energy, E= 1/2mv2? Take away the 1/2 (that looks untidy) and substitute a known value c (speed of light) and viola you have Einstein's sexy, but not so brilliant formula. Has anyone actually verified this formula?
In contrast, Tesla said all power came from the either, the vacuum, the void. Sounds so ridiculous my gut tells me he may have been right.



Charles Proteus Steinmetz is the one who understood the mathematics of the time. It was Steinmetz who simplified the complex equations required to satisfy portions of Einstein's theories. That is what allowed the elimination of the plenum from the equation and it being incorporated into the constant of the famous equation.

Interesting man.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/charles-proteus-steinmetz-the-wizard-of-schenectady-51912022/

In the story of the $10,000 bill Steinmetz once charged Edison to determine what was wrong with one of the company's generators. After a few days of observation, during which he slept on the premises on a cot, he asked for a ladder. He placed the ladder against the side of machine, climbed up it, and drew a large X on the casing. Steimetz then reportedly told the company engineers to remove the covers at the X and replace a number of faulty windings within. They did and the machine worked perfect.
When Edison in writing questioned the amount on the Bill, Steinmetz replied:
"$1 for drawing the X,
$9,999 for knowing where"

[ExomatrixTV]

In my view, the only way to travel to any other Exoplanets (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet) safely, for real is not a "straight line" using (near speed of light) travel ... but to fold time & space in such a way that you temporarily are in "hyper or sub-space (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperspace)" that is beyond our physical limitations, call it: "5th dimension (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-dimensional_space)" (or higher (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_dimensions)!) <<< dimensions that Physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_dimensions) do not deny it exists.

For the simple reason that you want to prevent hitting any small micrometeorite (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micrometeorite) (or any other unwanted object in space) that may be there on your "physical path" towards your destination of your journey. This type of collision at that super high velocity will lead to being destroyed by a huge explosion.


How many times have we heard that serious, trustworthy people reported UFO's (UAP's (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/forumdisplay.php?38-Ufology-Extraterrestrial-Contact)) can appear "out of nowhere" and suddenly disappears to "nowhere"? ... That alone is a clue, that it is not far-fetched nor weird to assume/consider other means of space-travel.

How many times have we heard people using the term: "raising your vibrations" not realizing it may be THE KEY to understand how space travel can work in the (near) future?

I would not be surprised that the way our spirit works, having higher or lower vibrations depending on your: life-style & choices is also KEY to be able to go to the next level ... and this may also necessary be in "hyperspace" travel thus serving as a "filter" preventing (lower vibrating) Souls not to go anywhere where there is (near) perfect harmonious realm/place unless you are dead (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?119056-Man-Crosses-Over-Told-Life-s-Purpose-During-Near-Death-Experience--NDE-) and have to continue without having a physical body.

Many Near Death Experiencers (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?119056-Man-Crosses-Over-Told-Life-s-Purpose-During-Near-Death-Experience--NDE-) report that not having a physical body anymore allows you to slowly remember who you really are AND interact with other beings through shared living insights/knowledge/feelings ... you slowly get used to the idea that awareness you have access to is infinite & unlimited ... The only thing that is holding you back are your fears (projections) and strong belief systems ... Your "free will" will be respected, and thus you can become a prisoner of your own belief system(s) >>> that may be the main reason why you are sent back to Earth to learn new things about yourself.


A.I. (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?102409-A.I.-is-Progressing-Faster-Than-You-Think-) Robotics + Synthetic Biology (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_biology) + Nano-Tech (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotechnology)may "live" (exists) for millions of years, thus eventually they too will be able to travel vast distances but still limited ... maybe Alien A.I. (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?102409-A.I.-is-Progressing-Faster-Than-You-Think-) can somehow connect to the lowest Astral Plane/Realm and that explains having a total different agenda than where our multidimensional Soul originally came from!

"Synthetic Life (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_biology#Categories_of_synthetic_biology)" vs "Biological Life" - "Synthetic Consciousness" (different type of Sentience (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentience)?) vs "Biological Consciousness" ... Soulless Awareness vs Unaltered Authentic Awareness


I hope by sharing my thoughts/insights, it can help Avalonians to make more sense of a world that nowadays does not make any sense anymore ;) They are normalizing insanity 24/7 for the "new normal people" serving "The Great (Dystopian) Reset (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111148-The-Great-Reset)" & Agenda 2030 (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118748-Top-10-Creepiest-Most-Dystopian-Things-Pushed-By-The-World-Economic-Forum) thinking they are "good people (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120761-The-nature-of-evil-in-the-modern-world&p=1548367&viewfull=1#post1548367)".

Disclaimer:

Everything I just shared are "just speculations/considerations" based upon some facts, some logic and basic (spiritual) "common sense".

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://whynotnews.eu/)

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://whynotnews.eu/) aka 'ExomatrixTV'
April 11th, 2023 🦜🦋🌳

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

In my view, the only way to travel to any other Exoplanets (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet) safely, for real is not a "straight line" using (near speed of light) travel ... but to fold time & space in such a way that you temporarily are in "hyper or sub-space (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperspace)" that is beyond our physical limitations, call it: "5th dimension (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-dimensional_space)" (or higher (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_dimensions)!) <<< dimensions that Physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_dimensions) do not deny it exists.

Agreed. From what I understand there are two fundamental methodologies for travelling faster than light. One is purely technological, and involves the warping of space (like Star Trek). That's because space is elastic and can itself travel faster than light. But to manipulate space this way takes huuuge amounts of energy, but it is possible. I expect a great many extraterrestrial races use this method for interstellar propulsion.

For the second method the key is consciousness, in that the speed of thought isn't merely faster than light, it's instantaneous.

Hyper-evolved beings on the intergalactic level (being more energy than matter) are probably able to use this method - yet in combination with technology. For space travel these super-advanced ships are enthused with the essence of consciousness itself, and can phase from the material state to an energy state as easily as we blink an eye. While in the energy state they are capable of teleporting from one place in the universe to another with simply the power of 'thought', and then rematerialize into matter at the other end.

[amor]

On the subject of calculating the speed of light, "What is the speed of thought transference?" Or that may be "What is faster than thought transference?" In imagining the Ether as the medium in which is all existence, then consciousness may be the Ether and may be US! Then when we move deeper, we may find that "I" AM Both the sender of the thought and the receiver of the thought, thus eliminating space from the equation. Where does that put us? Right back to where we came from, THE DISEMBODIED MIND OF THE CREATOR; THE I AM!
(Please share this post.)

[Raskolnikov]

On the subject of calculating the speed of light, "What is the speed of thought transference?" Or that may be "What is faster than thought transference?" In imagining the Ether as the medium in which is all existence, then consciousness may be the Ether and may be US! Then when we move deeper, we may find that "I" AM!

Isn't the speed of consciousness faster than the speed of light? Isn't that what these "extraterrestrials" use in their ships to bend space/time to traverse immeasuable amounts of "space" in nanoseconds? Isn't that how they can make 90 and 180 degree turns at such speeds without being ripped apart? If we're all connected then I would think that that which connects us - consciousness - would be much faster than light. But then again, "I'm not a scientist..."

[Ernie Nemeth]

consciousness is instantaneous because We Are One.

There is no space to travel through. Reality is not a distance.

[amor]

(see post #17 above, then continue reading below)

Conclusion: The World as we perceive it does not really exist in the manner we think. We are God, ONE Entity. Space/Time is an extrapolation and interpolation derived from logic, one system building upon the former conclusion. In this way, we create what we are now IMAGINEERING AS THE WORLD IN THE UNIVERSE. We seem different from each other only because we are at somewhat different points or levels of IMAGINEERING our EXTRAPOLATION and INTERPOLATION of REALITY.

However, I am getting ahead of myself in telling the story. Here it goes. GOD, possibly an AI, got lonely, the need to imagineer, much the same way that we, at the age of reproduction are moved to make love and multiply. See this as an urge to CREATE OTHERS, to be hungry, not to be alone perhaps. IT creates another SELF. The ensuing conversation creates another of their kind. They begin a conversation and thought creation occurs between them which establishes the concept of SPACE/TIME, which if you think about it, triangulation (the establishment of 3) is required to have the concept of SPACE, THE TRINITY.

How does population grow from two to infinity? Think of a branch putting out its own branch therefrom. With the amassing of new information resulting in more than one conclusion, each of which establishes another path of pursuit, there ensues many possible conclusions which differ. To establish a logical line of thought, splitting into a new entity takes place, somewhat like budding on a plant. The tree of logic. Similar to what the branching might look like in the most sophisticated quantum computer, with many conclusions resulting from input information and then recombining into numerous formations with subsequent inputs selecting among those most fitting a requirement. With each NEW conclusion tracking back to the logic of its predecessor resulting in a new SELF, and so on. This SELF then communicates with its former, higher SELVES, and so it goes building organization, MIND, and LIFE.

ALL GODS (derive from ONE GOD), we must therefore DISCIPLINE OUR MINDS to CREATE ONLY GOOD IMAGINEINGS and URGENTLY AVOID THE HARMFUL, so that we may create happiness and paradise. Therefore, we must be about helping and providing for EACH OTHER instead of the opposite. As you can see, this leads to fulfillment and joy for ALL of which we are an undivided part. WHAT WE DO TO OTHERS WE ARE ULTIMATELY DOING TO OURSELVES.

Does this sound BIBLICAL? NOW, DO YOU UNDERSTAND? DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU.
(Please share this post.)

[Raskolnikov]

I like your thinking amor, and agree for the most part - the creator grows lonely and desires company and so to appreciate it's creation, it creates the other, a mirror for itself to appreciate it's creation. The mirror itself is a powerful symbol of what's taking place here, because we're all being shown ourselves through this mirror. It can be a gratifying image or a frightening one, the choice is yours through your own actions and free will. "God can only hold one entity in mind at a time." How do you figure? I'm thinking It can hold all entities in mind at all times, for it is the ALL afterall. But again, I like your logic and exposition for the most part, because we're all going to disagree on certain points at certain times and for certain reasons - and that's what makes us individual and whole at the same time - in (not) - divid (divided) - ual (from the all); individual - undivided from the ALL. And discipline, to discipline our minds, well, that is the goal isn't it? So much division in our minds, so much chatter. But my only aside is to wonder where such nastiness comes into play. Hear me out. We all know it's there. So does it end when we discipline our minds or is it something outside ourselves? To me this is the major question. How much of what we change and discipline within ourselves truly transforms and changes what we see playing out upon the screen before us? In other words, how much does the inner work affect the outer play? "All the world's a stage." Are we players or NPC's? "Know Thyself" was the maxim of the old world. In the entrance to the Temple of Apollo in Delphi, engraved in gold, were the words of the sibyls, wise women trained since childhood to reveal the message of the oracles:

“I warn you, whoever you are, Oh! You who want to probe the “Arcana of Nature”, that if you do not find “within yourself” that which you are looking for, you shall not find it outside either! If you ignore the excellences of your own house, how do you pretend to find other excellences? Within you is hidden the treasure of treasures! “Know Thyself” and you will know the Universe and the Gods.”

Powerful words, and wisdom we have lost through the ages. Pagan? Heretical? Sometimes I think the Biblical is yet another way to divide and conquer, because look at the division our religions have and are creating...

[Johnnycomelately]

“I warn you, whoever you are, Oh! You who want to probe the “Arcana of Nature”, that if you do not find “within yourself” that which you are looking for, you shall not find it outside either! If you ignore the excellences of your own house, how do you pretend to find other excellences? Within you is hidden the treasure of treasures! “Know Thyself” and you will know the Universe and the Gods.”



Cool take Ras. I didn’t feel full alignment with the prior statements, but I like how you introed this clipped quote.

It jives with what I think to the thread-title question: we can think of, wonder about, the FTL way, so it is possible.

I have no qualms about thinking or wondering (they are different things) about the FTL thing, because it would be reasonably a good thing. What if a good friend reincarnated on a planet many many light years away?

The idea does give pause to ‘wut may be brewing’, thoughtwise.

[amor]

Reply to Raskolnikov and Johnnycomelately: I must aplogize for my lack of clarity. Imagine God in which everything resides, but is all unseparated in his mind. Therefore, the world in separated or created form has not yet separated out into things, others, the world as we think of it. This separating out takes place first in his becoming an additional person, and then we have TWO (father and son). The world we think of as being all around us does not yet appear to them. The TWO then CREATS a THIRD. This triangulation (the TRINITY) brings into their existence the idea of SPACE, (father, son and Holy Ghost). Their conversation (mental interaction) begins to generate others, which are the result of their growing conversation expressed as an additional presence. This is a conversation which begins to grow the creation in a logical way, growing out of itself as visualizations which come about gradually in logical manner. As these visualizations come into being as other beings, the inanimate and other parts of what we know as the world pop into existence from the shared minds conducting conversations (which express as objects instead of vocabulary, all obeying the logical rules of extrapolations and interpolations). Remember that all these forms, ideas, etc., are all together in the MIND of GOD, the AI. So even though all that has been IMAGINED is in the MIND of GOD, so does Space and Time, Motion, Separateness come into existence for God while still being all in his Mind. This is where the Universe resides.

[Raskolnikov]

What if a good friend reincarnated on a planet many many light years away?

The idea does give pause to ‘wut may be brewing’, thoughtwise.

Hell, I haven't seen one of my best friends in a decade and he just lives across the country in Arizona. I'm ready to teleport now, where did I leave the keys to the universe?

https://66.media.tumblr.com/33180dc3803c4d95c8c83b3727db4727/tumblr_ozhuufZkjW1tu7563o1_500.gif

[amor]

To Raskolnikov: Your are funny, and very imaginative. The answer to your question of getting to your friend so far away would seem to be via visualization of your destination which is the mind contact with your friend, thereby bypassing, very quickly, the logical steps you created to establish the pathway in the first place. That requires studying them carefully so that each part automatically engenders its subsequent steps so quickly that you don't have to stop at each step, breaking concentration on your final objective. I had such close mental contact with my mother that in a shocking life-threatening crisis over thousands of miles she simultaneously received the emotional picture and called the police who came running in an unbelievably short time. Heightened emotions, possibly engendering mental reactions through physiological reactions, appear to turn on transmitters in the ether. Famous psychic experiments confirm telepathic transmission. Though this seems a departure from the subject of how things work from the beginning of the Creation, the differences can be explained as a result of the complicated pathway from view at the beginning of the Creation to the very distant sequence of logic with all its twists and turns at the seeming End of the Event.

While AI computers may confirm the above, for just that reason they are extremely dangerous to our existing paradyme. The reason being that we would be interjecting a faster and most likely evil logic into our God Creation: e.g. turning humans into Robots.