Happy Free-Fall Acceleration Day! 9/11/2023

[Dennis Leahy]

Today, 9/11, is the anniversary of the miracle that happened 22 years ago on this day, when steel and concrete skyscrapers "burned" and "fell", at free-fall acceleration speed.

We've all seen the videos, we've all witnessed the miracles that happened on that day.

For those that want to know more about this miracle, free-fall acceleration is the speed of an object falling with nothing but air beneath it.

32 feet per second, per second is the formula.

In the first second, the object falling through nothing but air drops 32 feet, but is accelerating as it falls (thus the "per second, per second".)

High school physics teacher David Chandler - my vote for the patron saint of free-fall acceleration - performed a video analysis of WTC 7, "Building 7", and proved that the building collapsed for at least 100 feet at free-fall acceleration speed (the rest of the collapse was obscured by a building in front of it.) He forced the really really honest and trustworthy folks at the National Institute of Standards and Technology to admit that they couldn't explain how any building could collapse at free-fall acceleration speed.

In the normal world, where physics is normal, this would mean that somehow, 100% of the resistance supplied by the structure of the building was there, and then suddenly, it wasn't there. Even a building made of cardboard and toothpicks could not possibly fall at free-fall acceleration speed, much less 47 large steel columns, walls, pipes, etc. It collapsed exactly as if there was nothing but air under the building.

Glory be to Satan for allowing us useless eaters to witness the buildings falling at free-fall acceleration speed! We were not worthy, but yet we were allowed to watch the videos over and over and over again. It wasn't just defying the laws of physics, we witnessed a miracle!

(I published a "note" on faceboog, many years ago, offering 2.3 trillion dollars to anyone who could build a replica of building 7, get a certificate of occupancy to make sure the building was structurally sound, and burn it down at free-fall acceleration speed. So far, no takers.)

[East Sun]

No glory there!

The miracle is that those responsible were never arrested, convicted, imprisoned or executed.
Some of them are still strutting around.

Our USA is in dire need of something...something that I can not even put into words.

[norman]

https://www.skydiving.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/15E29DDD-DE4F-4C2E-A60D-857F5CE9F3E4-1200x675.jpg

[Kryztian]

Dennis, I love a good miracle just as much as the next guy. But I also like a good rational fact based explanation too.

Here's an interview with Kevin Ryan. Kevin worker for Underwriters Laboratories, aka "UL", and he certified that the floors in twin towers would retain their structural integrity during an intense fire. As we know, however, the "miraculous flames of Satan" melted the floors anyway.

Kevin has written about this issue extensively, but now is turning his attention to who did it. It seems that Satan has angels doing his work. His book "Another Nineteen" (https://ic911.org/republished-books/another-nineteen/) is available free on the ic911 website, and it looks beyond the 19 hijackers and at the others who worked to make 9/11 happen. Of course Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney are Satan's dearest archangels but there are many others who served the dark lord to make this "miracle" happen.

9zVyiX23g8E

(1 hour 11 minutes. Skip ahead to the 6 minutes mark to avoid the adverts)

[shaberon]

Because I was not in a room with a tv, my response when first told the World Trade Centers were destroyed was:


No they weren't.


I basically said it was impossible and they should check the news some other way.

Upon seeing the re-runs, all I could figure is that something was really wrong from that very moment.

It was, and it has actually gotten significantly worse.

[Kryztian]

Because I was not in a room with a tv, my response when first told the World Trade Centers were destroyed was:


No they weren't.


I basically said it was impossible and they should check the news some other way.

Upon seeing the re-runs, all I could figure is that something was really wrong from that very moment.

It was, and it has actually gotten significantly worse.

I had a similar experience. I was at work, there were no TVs and the internet went down and I couldn't get CNN (which, at the time, I regarded as a reliable news source :facepalm:)

I called a friend of mine in Manhattan who could see the tops of the WTC buildings from his living room with his face right up against the glass. He told me one of the buildings have fallen. At that point I envisioned the perhaps one point in the stucture had become week and the building toppled to the side. He said no, the building came straight down. I didn't think that possible, that entire steel support beams would completely disintegrate all at once. As we talked, the second building came down. He described it as collapsing straight into it's footprint. I thought about this all day long and thought that was impossible.

I finally got home and turned on the TV and watched the collapse footage, which the news was playing over and over again. When I saw the footage of the buildings collapsing at free fall into their own footprint, as in a planned implosion, I thought "Well, I am seeing it. It must have happened." and never thought about the issue again until seven or so years later when a friend started to send me emails saying 9/11 was an "inside" job.

Frankly, I don't think that it is productive to build a case of 9/11 being a deep-fake event, based on the collapse of buildings 1 and 2. There is a much easier case to be made by arguing that building 7 was a deep fake since it was not even hit by a plain, only experienced a few isolated fires from debris that fell from the other towers.

[shaberon]

There is a much easier case to be made by arguing that building 7 was a deep fake since it was not even hit by a plain, only experienced a few isolated fires from debris that fell from the other towers.


When I think in terms of motive, it is this and the Pentagon, hide the evidence.

Seven had offices with trails on trillions missing from the Pentagon, and, in that building, it was the Office of Naval Intelligence who may have been able to do something about it.

I tend to think this evidence was the real target, and the bigger towers were a ruse because the collateral carnage was convenient for Neocon strategies.

Seven had our reliable networking partner, the British Broadcasting Corporation, accurately prophesy its demise before it actually happening. We also suspect the same was true in the New Zealand newspapers at the time of Pearl Harbor. So, a new Pearl Harbor, that part sounds like a match.

If Pearl Harbor was a way to scuttle a fleet that otherwise required some very expensive repairs, and, the collateral carnage was just a convenient support for the Neocons of that era, the two attacks are curiously similar.

I suppose it is possible that Al Qaeda really was involved, in the sense of role playing, to make it look like a human pilot trained on a crop duster could maneuver some of the world's largest jets in some very difficult maneuvers while committing a crime in the world's most heavily guarded airspace right when a drill of this very nature is being run.

Seven plummeting at free fall because dustified by a few small office fires does not sound like something that happens unassisted.

Even a few years after this we had--it may have been called the Leaning Tower of Dallas--or somewhere--being such a building that was being imploded, but just stopped and leaned over.

Some ideas about this are less useful. For example by Silverstein saying "Pull it" he may literally have meant take out the fire fighters as he claims. I don't think we can really prove he was giving a command to dynamite the building. He may have had some hand in what was going on, and, evacuated the firefighters all the same. All the collusion that suggests itself in insurance, the security company, the airlines, is a bit ugly but still a step shy of definitely proving anything. Whereas what we physically observe, the bare facts, are practically impossible without intervention.

[Patient]

Yes, I remember that morning. I watched it live on TV before going into work.

I was stunned like everyone else of course.

But when I saw the Pentagon I immediately noticed that there was no plane wreckage. That just helped me to see through the trade towers collapse - there was something off right away when the towers went down, but the enormity of the situation didn't allow me to think critically until later. Seeing no plane at the Pentagon fuelled my skepticism.

[East Sun]

Some politicians literally get away with murder.

Even Hitler was helped to escape.