Gas Them All!

[Dennis Leahy]

[Israel, with the blessing of the USA, Inc.'s demented grandpa Biden, are about to slaughter as many Palestinians as they can. They don't care that half the Palestinians in Gaza are children or that Israel created Hamas, or that they will kill every man, woman, and child in Gaza in their revenge quest to retaliate against Hamas.]

I want to send a message to Bibi Netanyahu and Joe Biden that they cannot ignore. Something so shocking that they will not be able to move forward with their planned slaughter. My gut is already tight just thinking about what I'm going to write. God forgive me for what I'm about to write, but I actually hope that it will get copied and read aloud, publicly, to Netanyahu.


Dear Prime Minister Netanyahu,

I think I have come up with the final solution to your Palestinian problem. Gas them all! Round them all up and put them in ovens and gas chambers and release Zyklon B and kill them all! You might want to save a few for human experimentation, but kill all the rest! Make sure you kill all the children, because if you don't, they will grow up to be adult Palestinians. Make some lampshades with some of their skin. Cut off all their heads and place them on spears all around the border of Israel. If any other Arabs try to assist the Palestinian Gaza people, round them up too, torture them, and then gas them. Launch all of your nuclear weapons on all the Arab states around you, and follow that with cluster bombs and depleted uranium tipped missiles. Yahweh is on your side! President Joe Biden has already given you the green flag, so what are you waiting for? Kill them all! President Biden will quickly resupply you with more weapons, so don't be afraid of running out. If more Arabs keep coming, quickly build more ovens, more gas chambers. Use Zyklon B for poetic justice! Show the world that you are stronger than Adolph Hitler, Mr. Netanyahu! Show no mercy, show no compassion, and to hell with the Geneva Convention and international war crimes! Kill them all! Gas them all!

Sincerely,

Your American supporters: American Zionists and the American Defense Contractor consortium

[Raskolnikov]

Well why don't you tell us what you really think Dennis? More than justified, right there with ya. My mom's sister, a sane old girl who's on the same page and one of the few in my family who loves what I continually vomit with outright contempt, still believes the Israel dogma. I just don't understand it. Oh, btw, they are gassing us all, just look up...

[norman]

Hitler didn't bomb Dresden. Aim a little higher.

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/sites/default/files/styles/wide_medium/public/2020-02/PhotoofdevastatedDresden%20-%20Jason%20Dawsey.jpg

. . . and they even sent in Tavistock psychologists after the war to harvest useful information about terror and mind control.

[superior88]

[Israel, with the blessing of the USA, Inc.'s demented grandpa Biden, are about to slaughter as many Palestinians as they can. They don't care that half the Palestinians in Gaza are children or that Israel created Hamas, or that they will kill every man, woman, and child in Gaza in their revenge quest to retaliate against Hamas.]

I want to send a message to Bibi Netanyahu and Joe Biden that they cannot ignore. Something so shocking that they will not be able to move forward with their planned slaughter. My gut is already tight just thinking about what I'm going to write. God forgive me for what I'm about to write, but I actually hope that it will get copied and read aloud, publicly, to Netanyahu.


Dear Prime Minister Netanyahu,

I think I have come up with the final solution to your Palestinian problem. Gas them all! Round them all up and put them in ovens and gas chambers and release Zyklon B and kill them all! You might want to save a few for human experimentation, but kill all the rest! Make sure you kill all the children, because if you don't, they will grow up to be adult Palestinians. Make some lampshades with some of their skin. Cut off all their heads and place them on spears all around the border of Israel. If any other Arabs try to assist the Palestinian Gaza people, round them up too, torture them, and then gas them. Launch all of your nuclear weapons on all the Arab states around you, and follow that with cluster bombs and depleted uranium tipped missiles. Yahweh is on your side! President Joe Biden has already given you the green flag, so what are you waiting for? Kill them all! President Biden will quickly resupply you with more weapons, so don't be afraid of running out. If more Arabs keep coming, quickly build more ovens, more gas chambers. Use Zyklon B for poetic justice! Show the world that you are stronger than Adolph Hitler, Mr. Netanyahu! Show no mercy, show no compassion, and to hell with the Geneva Convention and international war crimes! Kill them all! Gas them all!

Sincerely,

Your American supporters: American Zionists and the American Defense Contractor consortium


I believe you have supporters already

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH2elbtCK9o&ab_channel=EGYPTChannel

[Johnnycomelately]

Dennis, I wish you well, in dealing with those thoughts. Tough headspace, reminds me of when I entertained what I call “fight daydreams”. I have sworn off those, for some years now, and defend ferociously whenever they still pop up.

From my POV, I think that the best we can do is present a good example. Whatever we think or say, besides and including what we do, kicks those particular wheels a-spinnin. Be careful. Peace to you.

[palehorse]

We are all ghosts in the shell, but look at the bright side of it. Just try to keep that little flame of love alive, it will make all the difference in the end.

No doubt these so called leaders of the world want to show how powerful they are, their message is clear and ruthless, so people must comply, be obedient, no questions and bla bla bla that we already know. If they want to do the worse they will, nothing we can do about that, be positive or negative in your thoughts won't change anything in their decisions, it can only change for yourself and maybe just maybe the close ones around you, if they are open to that.

First thing most people in this world has to learn, is that we never die, we just leave the shell at some point. Do you feel earth as your eternal home or just a passage? For me I have no doubts it is just a passage, others may see it different.

Hope you feel better.

[shaberon]

. . . and they even sent in Tavistock psychologists after the war to harvest useful information about terror and mind control.


I take the communique' as sheer trolling, as the lampshades and Zyklon B are probably also Tavistock myths, assisted by a French plumber building the gas chambers in 1956.


From Haaretz (https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2013-10-25/ty-article/.premium/bibi-a-master-of-shoah-business/0000017f-f5ec-d318-afff-f7ef75270000):


Raised on the Holocaust
Netanyahu is a master of the art of Shoah business, a true disciple of Menachem Begin, who was the first to release the genie of the Holocaust from the bottle.


Holocaust Industry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust_Industry)


Those are exploitations.

Again we think there are some exaggerations.

One can say that when the Zionists demanded Palestine, then, Jews became specifically targeted for killings. Otherwise they were part of the ragtag "everybody" who was generally being oppressed, let us note, mainly as conscript labor, and actually you would prefer a workforce than death.

If you have the stomach to closely inspect a few black and white films of bulldozed bodies, they are uncircumsized men.

If you had a cyanide gas chamber, you could not have SS retrieving bodies a few minutes later with no gas mask.

Allied bombing of the rail lines harmed the food supply, and spawned disease, e. g. Zyklon B was a louse exterminator, and so in the final years, everyone was sick and hungry.

Making any kind of demand to a Fuhrer sounds unlikely, and if it is one that threatens him, then you would know there would be an angry response. Not to excuse the Nazis, but, in practical terms, it sounds like the Zionists were willing to "make that sacrifice" in order to get their way.

Nazis killed everyone who may have threatened their program. Everyone knew that. Jews managed to make themselves look worse than non-Jews. The more the suspicion, the more the bullets in the head.


Probably the most appropriate thing we could have ever sent to an Israeli government is no money.

[TrumanCash]

They invaded and took their land by force and then isolated them on a small piece of land where they could be corralled and genocided. Understandably, the oppressed fought back in defense of their lives.

No, I'm not talking about Israel and Palestinians. I'm talking about the natives (erroneously called "Indians") of the land which is now called "United States of America". Is there a pattern here? Oh, say can you see? :Music:

[thepainterdoug]

Truman. its the way of the world, the way of the human, animal too. Im not condoning it, but the Indian took it from other Indians. Tribes fighting tribes, humans fighting and stealing from other humans throughout history

one would need to see the story from the start and we cannot do that

[TrumanCash]

52082
Truman. its the way of the world, the way of the human, animal too. Im not condoning it, but the Indian took it from other Indians. Tribes fighting tribes, humans fighting and stealing from other humans throughout history

one would need to see the story from the start and we cannot do that

You are correct that some tribes fought with each other and this was due to the manipulation of ETs that are nowadays referred to with the term "Anunnaki". I know this because I have seen this mechanism firsthand which I exposed in THE EYE OF RA.

Also, one can see the Anunnaki influence via the symbols used by various American tribes such as winged poisonous snakes, swastikas, circle with a point in the middle (Sun God symbol), cross, thunderbird (flying saucer), etc. (Example below) These symbols are all over the planet. The precursors of these symbols were revealed by James Churchward in his books in association with Lemuria and Mu.

Huitzlilopochtli (Sun God/War God) and Quetzalcoatl (feathered/winged serpent) in mesoamerica were the same "gods" as Ra (Sun God/War God) and Thoth (Ra's Messenger). The Navajo still use these symbols in their sand paintings.

I cover all of this in the "Language of Symbols" chapter in THE EYE OF RA. Also, human sacrifice taught by these gods existed in or on mesoamerican pyramids as well as in the Great Pyramid in Egypt. In both the western hemisphere, for example, the poisonous snake is a rattlesnake; in the eastern hemisphere it is the cobra.

In Egypt Ra used one cobra on a staff and Thoth's symbol was two cobras on a staff. I even found a photo of an Aztec sacrificial knife with two rattlesnakes coiled on the handle (caduceus).

The Thunder God in the east was the Nordic Thunder God Thor. Multiple people met Val "Thor" at the Pentagon and elsewhere including Al Bielek and Phil Schneider, both of whom I knew personally. Phil Schneider also reportedly saw what appears to have been more like a tall Gray deep under the Pentagon. Phil also witnessed the secret underground UN meetings overseen by seven foot tall Grays.

So in my experience and in my opinion it is very evident these ETs were manipulating people into wars all over the planet. And IMO they still are.

BTW, I was captured by the Mantis, forced into a female human body, taken by a flying saucer to Atlantis (now called Antarctica) wherein I was sacrificed in the same fashion as it was done in mesoamerica and Egypt.

I stumbled onto the phenomenon of abductees (ETs call us "chosen ones") being followed from lifetime to lifetime and sometimes placed in positions of authority by the abducting ETs. When one conducts extensive past life research with abductees one will eventually run into this phenomenon.

Symbol used by Mississippian mound builders
52082

[shaberon]

one would need to see the story from the start and we cannot do that


Not completely, but we can from a certain point.


When the U. S. Constitution was framed, it had:


No European antecedents other than a few English and French theory books.

The actual existing role model was the Iroquois Confederacy (https://www.history.com/news/iroquois-confederacy-influence-us-constitution):


When the delegates to the Constitutional Convention met in 1787 to debate what form of government the United States should have, there were no contemporary democracies in Europe from which they could draw inspiration. The most democratic forms of government that any of the convention members had personally encountered were those of Native American nations.

What evidence exists that the delegates studied Native governments? Descriptions of them appear in the three-volume handbook John Adams wrote for the convention surveying different types of governments and ideas about government. It included European philosophers like John Locke and Montesquieu, whom U.S. history textbooks have long identified as constitutional influences; but it also included the Iroquois Confederacy and other Indigenous governments, which many of the delegates knew through personal experience.

Definitely not any kind of direct, concerted invasion:

You had the Cherokee chiefs having dinner with [Thomas] Jefferson’s father in Williamsburg...the U.S. had trade and diplomatic relationships with Native governments..."


Things are difficult to process for English-speaking brains:



The fact that many of the framers looked to Native governments for inspiration didn’t stop them from viewing Native people as inferior. This disconnect is evident in a 1751 letter from Benjamin Franklin describing the need for the 13 colonies to form a “voluntary Union” similar to that of the Iroquois Confederacy:

“It would be a very strange Thing, if six Nations of ignorant Savages should be capable of forming a Scheme for such an Union, and be able to execute it in such a Manner, as that it has subsisted Ages, and appears indissoluble; and yet that a like Union should be impracticable for ten or a Dozen English Colonies, to whom it is more necessary, and must be more advantageous; and who cannot be supposed to want an equal Understanding of their Interests.”


It is not possible to make any *consistent* statement about "Native Americans". The Confederation mostly pertained to the areas of modern New York and Canada. The southern Cherokee--those ones who suffered the Trail of Tears--were Iroquoian invaders who displaced local groups, and in their own words, exterminated the Moon-Eyed People (https://northcarolinaghosts.com/mountains/moon-eyed-people/).

I suppose it is a terrible irony that the influence of "democracy" (ruled by hereditary chiefs) translated into a new Constitution which did nothing but wage force against them--no, in terms of a "country", the U. S. was not particularly kind to any Natives, without any exceptions that readily come to mind. It seems to me that this is less "racist", but derives more from the feeling of Christian superiority over non-Christians.

Old World colonization at least had the excuse of English vs. Latin competition, the latter perhaps being far worse in terms of Encomienda (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encomienda), a religious institution of slavery over conquered peoples. I don't remember the Americans doing much of this.

Zion, a modern colony, does not seem to bear comparison to anything prior.

[gord]

one would need to see the story from the start and we cannot do that


Not completely, but we can from a certain point.


When the U. S. Constitution was framed, it had:


No European antecedents other than a few English and French theory books.

The actual existing role model was the Iroquois Confederacy (https://www.history.com/news/iroquois-confederacy-influence-us-constitution):


When the delegates to the Constitutional Convention met in 1787 to debate what form of government the United States should have, there were no contemporary democracies in Europe from which they could draw inspiration. The most democratic forms of government that any of the convention members had personally encountered were those of Native American nations.

What evidence exists that the delegates studied Native governments? Descriptions of them appear in the three-volume handbook John Adams wrote for the convention surveying different types of governments and ideas about government. It included European philosophers like John Locke and Montesquieu, whom U.S. history textbooks have long identified as constitutional influences; but it also included the Iroquois Confederacy and other Indigenous governments, which many of the delegates knew through personal experience.

Definitely not any kind of direct, concerted invasion:

You had the Cherokee chiefs having dinner with [Thomas] Jefferson’s father in Williamsburg...the U.S. had trade and diplomatic relationships with Native governments..."


Things are difficult to process for English-speaking brains:



The fact that many of the framers looked to Native governments for inspiration didn’t stop them from viewing Native people as inferior. This disconnect is evident in a 1751 letter from Benjamin Franklin describing the need for the 13 colonies to form a “voluntary Union” similar to that of the Iroquois Confederacy:

“It would be a very strange Thing, if six Nations of ignorant Savages should be capable of forming a Scheme for such an Union, and be able to execute it in such a Manner, as that it has subsisted Ages, and appears indissoluble; and yet that a like Union should be impracticable for ten or a Dozen English Colonies, to whom it is more necessary, and must be more advantageous; and who cannot be supposed to want an equal Understanding of their Interests.”


It is not possible to make any *consistent* statement about "Native Americans". The Confederation mostly pertained to the areas of modern New York and Canada. The southern Cherokee--those ones who suffered the Trail of Tears--were Iroquoian invaders who displaced local groups, and in their own words, exterminated the Moon-Eyed People (https://northcarolinaghosts.com/mountains/moon-eyed-people/).

I suppose it is a terrible irony that the influence of "democracy" (ruled by hereditary chiefs) translated into a new Constitution which did nothing but wage force against them--no, in terms of a "country", the U. S. was not particularly kind to any Natives, without any exceptions that readily come to mind. It seems to me that this is less "racist", but derives more from the feeling of Christian superiority over non-Christians.

Old World colonization at least had the excuse of English vs. Latin competition, the latter perhaps being far worse in terms of Encomienda (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encomienda), a religious institution of slavery over conquered peoples. I don't remember the Americans doing much of this.

Zion, a modern colony, does not seem to bear comparison to anything prior.

Your comment caught my attention because I've spent most of my life in what was once Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) territory, and because their influence on the beginnings of the US is so little known, and should be better known.

The Six Nations (https://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/6Nations/) section of David Ratcliffe's web site (https://www.ratical.org/) has a lot of information about this, including several complete books in a few different formats.

Too bad those who created the US didn't keep their word on, well, anything...

Anyway, this is straying off topic for the thread, so I'll just leave it right there.

[Jim_Duyer]

I decided to see what I would find when deciphering the mentions of "chosen ones" and "promised land", both of which were spun into an idea of some God-given right to take the lands away from others who were "pagans" or "heathens", which applies both to those of Canaan and America (Palestinians and Native Americans).

And surprise, surprise, this is what the actual underlying text gives us - no mention of promised or chosen anything, but instead:

Like putting a gate on an empty house lot to hold it in custody,
Or writing for young donkeys;
A nation that acts with angry wrath diminishes itself.

Most dogma will fall by the wayside when we discover that the original, underlying and true accounts in the Old Testament do indeed closely match what Jesus told us, and that the imposter god who supplanted EL was the one who implanted all of these ideas in our collective consciousness. There is no evil, murdering, jealous god in the OT that contrasts with JC. It's simply the Cain group writing what they wished, after supplanting and mostly destroying the right-hand, righteous group of early writers.

BTY - the same holds true for mentions of homosexuality being an abomination, or blacks being slaves forever, and women being second-class citizens. Just not true in the authentic, underlying text. Only true in the Cain version we were sold.
Have we been lied to for 2,000 plus years? Sure, or longer than that.

[shaberon]

...their influence on the beginnings of the US is so little known, and should be better known.

Too bad those who created the US didn't keep their word on, well, anything...

Anyway, this is straying off topic for the thread, so I'll just leave it right there.


Nothing is terribly off-topic if you can make a reasonable connection.

The native government had been functioning since 1450 if not before!

The guys with theory books are going to tell the "ignorant savages" what's what?? And so on, to all the other countries in the world, until everyone gets tired of what really happens and says "leave us alone". Except for Zion--"give me more".

We have so much to complain about, sometimes I ask around to see if anyone knows an example of an outbreak of peace. So far, they don't. I can come up with maybe six or eight, and Iroquois Confederation would definitely be a part of that.

What we may have lost was not anyone's "word", because the Agricultural Economy kept raising its voice until it was finally extinguished in the early 1900s. That is because Wall Street--who were not much of settlers or the people actually doing any work--became dominant, because they were behind The Constitution and steadily worked everything to their advantage. And, well, they were pretty honest about what they were doing too. Just a matter of their influence swinging from zero to 100%.

I am not sure the federal government was deceptive until "The Creature from Jekyll Island" and the setup for the Federal Reserve happening at some kind of emergency session near Christmas allowing two legislators to pass it. At that point, things are going on behind our backs. Until then everything was hotly and publicly debated.

Then the "six million Jews" were eradicated in Europe around 1920, and again around 1945, and it is pretty unlikely that there ever were six million Jews in Europe--in fact now the whole diaspora is barely larger than the population of Israel, there are about 8-9 million Jews world wide. So that might be...that might be a bit off.

[Denise/Dizi]

There will be no change in the world until those that want peace, demand it from those who are in seats of power and authority... and force those that capitalize on war, to have no other options if they still want to stay in their seats in the nosebleed section... (At the top)

Non participation to the most extreme result, would be the only way to accomplish this, as they would have no one to control if everyone just stopped playing their games...But that takes sacrifice on a great scale, sacrifice that most are either too tired, or too lazy or weak to endure...

It would take great teachers to reteach the youth, that diversity is to be celebrated as each culture brings something unique to our civilizations.. There is something here for everyone, yet we are trying to make everything "vanilla", or compatible with all regions... A one world way of seeing this world, and right now they're fighting over whose "Way of life" will rise to the top of that... It isn't over just land or religion... Will it be global slavery in every form? Or peaceful and abundant for all? That is what we decide... by our actions.

It doesn't seem to be getting any better either. Dark days ahead at this rate, you would think we would have learned to get along by now, and the fact that humans don't demand it from those that they elect to powerful positions? Shows a lack of caring about anything but their own lifestyles and way of living... Further adding to the problems.

I get your frustrations Dennis...