Bo Atkinson
9th November 2023, 21:57
Does it help to read this? I did support the possibly agreeable cause, simply by google listing. Too many doc references to look up, but there might be someone on PA or google, who is researching these keywords.
DOJ caught lying to the Court
Red-handed
TARGETED JUSTICE, INC.
NOV 9
https://substack.com/redirect/828c48b1-d172-4402-ab6d-582c4ee993cc?j=eyJ1IjoiN3cxcGYifQ.euHP01otZopepTKGDlLdoq06ftbUmVFzXA5xCXsUt9c
*Includes opinions of Targeted Justice, Inc.
DOJ Attorneys were caught red-handed, lying to the 5th Circuit Court.
Attorney Ana Toledo filed a Motion to Strike yesterday, that identified serious problems with their filing.
Read it here:
https://www.targetedjustice.com/motion-to-strike---doj-lying.html
/
Here is one of the lies:
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
A certificate of interested persons is not required, as defendants-appellees are governmental parties. 5th Cir. R. 28.2.1.
/
Case: 23-20342
U.S. Department of Justice
BRIAN M. BOYNTON /Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
ALAMDAR HAMDANI /United States Attorney & former Law Professor at University of Houston
SHARON SWINGLE /Attorney, Appellate Staff
GRAHAM W. WHITE /Attorney, Appellate Staff
/
What signature?
1. There was no DOJ signature.
(If you know the document is a lie, of course you won't sign it.)
2. DOJ Attorneys are well-versed in the proper court procedures, and Plaintiffs provided 2 Exhibits showing where Attorneys had filed court papers recently identifying the interested parties, and properly signing the Motion.
DOJ Attorneys have appeared before the 5th Circuit many times. They know what the required procedures are.
3. DOJ Attorneys failed to specify, “a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent corporations, or other legal entities who or which are financially interested in the outcome of the litigation.” This includes Infragard, Citizen Corps, and corporations like Leidos that benefit financially from putting non-terrorists on a terrorist database. But they did not list anything.
4. DOJ Attorneys failed to inform the Court that former TSC Director Charles Kable had retired/resigned at the end of January 2023 - apparently only days after he received the notice of our lawsuit. Coincidence?
5. DOJ Attorneys failed to inform the Court that Michael Glasheen, began as TSC Director in June 2023. They also did not inform our counsel.
6. DOJ Attorneys signed numerous court documents stating that the documents were correct, and that the identified Defendants were correct.
But they were not correct. See Dockets number 2 thru 80, that were signed by the DOJ. This shows more than 12 documents that were filed separately and falsely certifying that the Defendants listed were correct.
https://www.targetedjustice.com/docket-list.html
7. DOJ Attorneys failed to inform the court and correct the record, when the Houston District Court, "accidentally" forgot to mention the individual capacity defendants. How does a Court forget who is involved in a lawsuit? It is clearly spelled out at the beginning of the lawsuit.
/
AMAZING
8. This isn’t the first time the DOJ attorneys have lied like this. They did the same thing in the case Missouri v. Biden - they pretended that companies like Twitter and Google were not interested parties, and falsely filed the certification. The only name that appears in both of these false certifications is Brian M. Boynton.
https://substack.com/redirect/85f9fb3f-640d-4f22-80b5-0b59f70a6f6b?j=eyJ1IjoiN3cxcGYifQ.euHP01otZopepTKGDlLdoq06ftbUmVFzXA5xCXsUt9c
/
"Intentional deceptions."
Fortunately, our sharp attorney caught these "intentional deceptions." That's the politically-correct term the court uses when someone lies.
/
Sanctions
7. We asked the Court to consider sanctions. That basically means paying a fine, and being humiliated. We would like for the ruling to be reversed. Let’s see how many more lies the DOJ will try to get away with…
Rule 11(b)
SANCTIONS. (1) In General. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the court may impose an appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule or is responsible for the violation.
/
Read our filing here:
https://www.targetedjustice.com/motion-to-strike---doj-lying.html
/
*Includes opinions of Targeted Justice, Inc. - a news media representative per CFR 47 S 0.466
/
/
You're currently a free subscriber to Targeted Justice Newsletter. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
DOJ caught lying to the Court
Red-handed
TARGETED JUSTICE, INC.
NOV 9
https://substack.com/redirect/828c48b1-d172-4402-ab6d-582c4ee993cc?j=eyJ1IjoiN3cxcGYifQ.euHP01otZopepTKGDlLdoq06ftbUmVFzXA5xCXsUt9c
*Includes opinions of Targeted Justice, Inc.
DOJ Attorneys were caught red-handed, lying to the 5th Circuit Court.
Attorney Ana Toledo filed a Motion to Strike yesterday, that identified serious problems with their filing.
Read it here:
https://www.targetedjustice.com/motion-to-strike---doj-lying.html
/
Here is one of the lies:
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
A certificate of interested persons is not required, as defendants-appellees are governmental parties. 5th Cir. R. 28.2.1.
/
Case: 23-20342
U.S. Department of Justice
BRIAN M. BOYNTON /Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
ALAMDAR HAMDANI /United States Attorney & former Law Professor at University of Houston
SHARON SWINGLE /Attorney, Appellate Staff
GRAHAM W. WHITE /Attorney, Appellate Staff
/
What signature?
1. There was no DOJ signature.
(If you know the document is a lie, of course you won't sign it.)
2. DOJ Attorneys are well-versed in the proper court procedures, and Plaintiffs provided 2 Exhibits showing where Attorneys had filed court papers recently identifying the interested parties, and properly signing the Motion.
DOJ Attorneys have appeared before the 5th Circuit many times. They know what the required procedures are.
3. DOJ Attorneys failed to specify, “a complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent corporations, or other legal entities who or which are financially interested in the outcome of the litigation.” This includes Infragard, Citizen Corps, and corporations like Leidos that benefit financially from putting non-terrorists on a terrorist database. But they did not list anything.
4. DOJ Attorneys failed to inform the Court that former TSC Director Charles Kable had retired/resigned at the end of January 2023 - apparently only days after he received the notice of our lawsuit. Coincidence?
5. DOJ Attorneys failed to inform the Court that Michael Glasheen, began as TSC Director in June 2023. They also did not inform our counsel.
6. DOJ Attorneys signed numerous court documents stating that the documents were correct, and that the identified Defendants were correct.
But they were not correct. See Dockets number 2 thru 80, that were signed by the DOJ. This shows more than 12 documents that were filed separately and falsely certifying that the Defendants listed were correct.
https://www.targetedjustice.com/docket-list.html
7. DOJ Attorneys failed to inform the court and correct the record, when the Houston District Court, "accidentally" forgot to mention the individual capacity defendants. How does a Court forget who is involved in a lawsuit? It is clearly spelled out at the beginning of the lawsuit.
/
AMAZING
8. This isn’t the first time the DOJ attorneys have lied like this. They did the same thing in the case Missouri v. Biden - they pretended that companies like Twitter and Google were not interested parties, and falsely filed the certification. The only name that appears in both of these false certifications is Brian M. Boynton.
https://substack.com/redirect/85f9fb3f-640d-4f22-80b5-0b59f70a6f6b?j=eyJ1IjoiN3cxcGYifQ.euHP01otZopepTKGDlLdoq06ftbUmVFzXA5xCXsUt9c
/
"Intentional deceptions."
Fortunately, our sharp attorney caught these "intentional deceptions." That's the politically-correct term the court uses when someone lies.
/
Sanctions
7. We asked the Court to consider sanctions. That basically means paying a fine, and being humiliated. We would like for the ruling to be reversed. Let’s see how many more lies the DOJ will try to get away with…
Rule 11(b)
SANCTIONS. (1) In General. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the court may impose an appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule or is responsible for the violation.
/
Read our filing here:
https://www.targetedjustice.com/motion-to-strike---doj-lying.html
/
*Includes opinions of Targeted Justice, Inc. - a news media representative per CFR 47 S 0.466
/
/
You're currently a free subscriber to Targeted Justice Newsletter. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.