The Resistance

[Vicus]

The Resistance

(How to F#*... the Mother F#*...WEF)

This Thread will be a work in progress...not gloom and doom but about ACTIONS against!


BAN SYNTHETIC FOOD

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_ciencia5/geneticfood253_01_small.jpg


Italy is set to become the first country in the world to ban synthetic food, with a bill to,

prohibit the production, import, and marketing of laboratory-produced food products being debated in the country's lower house of parliament...

Announced by Italian Agriculture Minister Francesco Lollobrigida during a recent event in Kilkenny, Ireland, the move is based on the precautionary principle and aims to ensure high quality food for all, rather than just an elite few.



While laboratory-grown meat is promoted as environmentally friendly,

recent research suggests its carbon footprint is likely to be orders of magnitude higher than that of conventional meat.

Stating that the Italian government wants to create an example on how to regulate synthetic food products, Agriculture Minister Francesco Lollobrigida insists,

everyone should be able to eat well and that high quality food cannot only be produced for the rich elites...

Describing laboratory-grown meat as "suicide" for somewhere like Italy, he says the Italian government is campaigning to get its country's food added to UNESCO's Intangible Cultural Heritage List.

Lollobrigida believes that approving laboratory-produced food products could ultimately result in the disappearance of fields and farms and that this would create an environmental disaster.


The production of foods in bioreactors would not only have a negative environmental impact, he argues, but it could also pose a risk to human health.

A higher carbon footprint than regular beef



While synthetic meat is promoted as being environmentally friendly, on the assumption that its production would involve less land, water, and greenhouse gases than raising cattle, recent research ,

its carbon footprint is likely to be orders of magnitude higher than that of conventional beef.,,

In a study conducted at the University of California, Davis, researchers found that, based on current and near-term production methods, scaling up the manufacture of laboratory-grown meat would be highly energy intensive and have a global warming potential up to 25 times greater than the average for retail beef.

Given this finding it is perhaps ironic that Bill Gates is one of the biggest backers of laboratory-grown meat.

Frequently to be heard endorsing warnings on the dangers of climate change, Gates has argued that rich countries should shift entirely to synthetic beef.

Cynics might consider his backing of such products to be less about averting global warming and more about securing patents and profits. Viewed in this light, Gates' new status as America's biggest private owner of farmland raises all manner of questions.

Thus far only the United States and Singapore have approved any laboratory-grown meat for human consumption.

As observers have noted, however, if clearance is gained in the European Union, the bloc's laws on free movement of goods and services could essentially prevent Italy from enforcing any national ban on these products.

Inspired by the Mediterranean diet

Several Italian government ministers have cited their country's famoushttps://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2023/10/the-mediterranean-diet-and-its-role-in-the-prevention-and-treatment-of-chronic-diseases/as the inspiration for the new bill.



Arguably the most studied diet of the past seventy years, the key components on which it has historically been based include fruit and vegetables in large quantities, whole grains, legumes and nuts, olive oil, yogurt, moderate amounts of cheese, a maximum of around four eggs per week, with small amounts of meat, fish, and wine.



Numerous studies have linked the Mediterranean diet to improved health and greater longevity, as well as the prevention of diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and other chronic diseases.



In a keynote speech given in October 2014 in the historic town of Barletta in Southern Italy, Dr. Matthias Rath laid out the cornerstones of a new, preventive approach to healthcare.



Describing how micronutrient deficiency is the primary cause of chronic disease, he pointed out that the great majority of the substances we require from our daily diets are contained in the fruits, vegetables, and plants that grow in our gardens and farms.



This understanding, he explained, paves the way towards the natural control of today's most common diseases.



Scientific research is increasingly confirming the health benefits of naturally produced organic food.



At the same time,

the life-shortening effects of ultra-processed foods are rapidly becoming clear...

Laboratory-grown meat and other ultra-processed foods are,

primarily designed to benefit their multibillionaire backers...

With it becoming ever more apparent that the modern-day multinational food industry should be seen as part of the 'business with disease,' humanity consumes these dangerous new synthetic food products at its peril...

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia3/ciencia_geneticfood253.htm






















As observers have noted, however, if clearance is gained in the European Union, the bloc's laws on free movement of goods and services could essentially prevent Italy from enforcing any national ban on these products.

[Lunesoleil]

If I understood my discussion thread on the challenge taken up will have inspired you, because that is what it is about resisting all kinds of temptation and I weigh my words because it is not It's not my intention to go beyond that, thank you

[Vicus]

Sorry Lunesoleil;

I don't know what are you talking about,some post from you (music) I found nice and thank you about.
Maybe I don't check the post you refer... :blushing: Avalon is a labyrinth...
if you post me your post/Thread will see...

[Lunesoleil]

It was the title of your publication that made me think of my challenge, because to go all the way without failing, we need resistance, because temptation is like wanting to do good and attract evil, because it is the same energy.
We need to be strong and for that to have resistance, thank you for answering me

[RatRodRob...RRR]

I love meat, especially rib eye, but ive started to avoid steak and are heading more towards meat with a BONE in it, when i buy meat with a bone in it, i hope atleast this means it is NOT LAB grown.

Lamb chops mmmmmmmm

RRR

[nzn]

When are they put a price on Billy boys head? We all tired of that goofball already.

[palehorse]

I like the spirit of this thread, most people here on Avalon I am sure they already resist and boycott industrialized garbage.

I started the thread "Starve the beast" a while ago, and it aims in to bring solutions to the table too, it is just not specific about WEF, but anything that we could imagine that compose the beast system. Some solutions are simple and we can only do ourselves, in order to "educate" the people it can take a long way, and the most important factor is about acceptance to change, are people willing to change or just fall blindly into the many traps out there?

@RatRodRob...RRR wrote something very important, I came with the same idea several years ago, when I heard cases of minced human meat, and mcdonalds and others involved in scandals.. so minced meat is out of question for me, unless I see the butcher mincing/grounding right in front of my eyes. Pick your T-bone or whatever boned meat and you will be safe... I guess, in this constantly changing weird world we live, who knows!


https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120017-Starve-the-beast-solutions



[Edited]

Ok, I forgot to mention, the title of this thread brought up memories of a great little book called "Total Resistance - Swiss Army Guide to Guerrilla Warfare and Underground Operations" it was written by Major H. von Dach Bern (Swiss Army) in 1957 (original title in German language) and then translated into English around 1965. It worth to mention that the original book is a collection of 7 volumes, manual like data, I am not sure if the English version is shorter, unless comparing it side by side.

When it comes to resistance one have to delve himself into the guerrilla warfare subject. Survivalists now refers this book and even use parts of it as their own tactics. It is a very important book to read.

From the book:

"
In all of this, it is well to repeat six basic principles which must be present if such a resistance is to succeed and eventual victory be achieved. These are:

1. A loyal people who will support the effort at great risk to themselves.
2. Favorable terrain, and organization to fit particular terrain needs. A possible safe haven.
3. A source of adequate finances.
4. Good communications ( radio, telephone, etc.)
5. An adequate supply of food to support the units.
6. Support from an outside power ( most important ).

The final paragraphs of the book bear repeating here. If two enemies fight each other to the last and this is always the case where an ideology is involved (religion is part of it) guerrilla warfare and civilian resistance will inevitably break out in the final phase. The military expert who undervalues or even disregards guerrilla warfare makes a mistake since he does not take into consideration the strength of heart.
"


I just searched the Avalon Library and nothing came up, so I found it online, here is the PDF, it is a short book circa 175 pages very well written. This version of the book is divided into 2 parts:

First part
ORGANIZATION AND CONDUCT OF GUERRILLA WARFARE

Second part
ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF THE CIVILIAN RESISTANCE MOVEMENT


https://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/Total-Resistance.pdf

[Vicus]

Just for relief... :laughs:

We are all eaters...everything that's move landed on the grill...that's why we are at the top of the food chain (yet)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOmIMMbT-9Y

[shaberon]

When it comes to resistance one have to delve himself into the guerrilla warfare subject.



That is the thing. It does have this meaning.

Moreover, it is against the Establishment, which these days would be the Constitution.

The WEF has no power. It's just a club.

I just saw a private club steal some guy's ship. It can hold 5,100 cars! This is one of the most impressive crimes I have heard of. That is Resistance, whereas passing a bill is legislation. Italy, of course, is a case study in changing governments. The Unification of Italy is a convoluted process that took from Waterloo to 1871 (https://www.theflorentine.net/2011/03/10/the-italian-risorgimento-a-timeline/). This is in order to scratch up the Bank of Italy 1893 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_Italy). Hence the government now in its contemplations of cultured meat.

Because I use language in a precise way, I would talk about Resistance against an Establishment, which I am not sure if that is stronger than what is intended here.

I have posted in Palehorse's thread and still we are mostly in the state that there are several ideas we would like to do, but we don't really have the resources or ability to do much. Our personal actions are relatively limited.

I would have loved to have made a front based on everything organic, for most of my life, nothing has happened. Let me put it this way, The update is over ten years ago now. But in 1992 there was the Earth Summit, which I did not understand was a brainchild of WEF or I think it was probably Club of Rome. We were coming out of shock because it looked like Bush had just attacked Iraq for Oil, and so the timing was very good for this to come up about international governmental discussion about the environment.

In 2012 I listened to something about Earth Summit II from a twelve year old girl, who hadn't even been born for the first one. And her exact words were "everything is going backwards". And this remains relevant to the present moment.

Let's call it thirty years of watching the same basic discussion go nowhere, on a personal level for myself as well as the world political arena.

[Luca Busarello]

I don't know a lot of the regulamentation about syntethic food around the globe, but in Italy it's forbidden, I hope it's true always YES!

https://www.ansa.it/canale_terraegusto/notizie/in_breve/2023/03/28/cibo-sintetico-al-bando-multe-fino-a-60.000-euro_72acc49d-606e-4c34-9f8b-4b24810700af.html

[palehorse]

When it comes to resistance one have to delve himself into the guerrilla warfare subject.



That is the thing. It does have this meaning.

Moreover, it is against the Establishment, which these days would be the Constitution.

The WEF has no power. It's just a club.

I just saw a private club steal some guy's ship. It can hold 5,100 cars! This is one of the most impressive crimes I have heard of. That is Resistance, whereas passing a bill is legislation. Italy, of course, is a case study in changing governments. The Unification of Italy is a convoluted process that took from Waterloo to 1871 (https://www.theflorentine.net/2011/03/10/the-italian-risorgimento-a-timeline/). This is in order to scratch up the Bank of Italy 1893 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_Italy). Hence the government now in its contemplations of cultured meat.

Because I use language in a precise way, I would talk about Resistance against an Establishment, which I am not sure if that is stronger than what is intended here.

I have posted in Palehorse's thread and still we are mostly in the state that there are several ideas we would like to do, but we don't really have the resources or ability to do much. Our personal actions are relatively limited.

I would have loved to have made a front based on everything organic, for most of my life, nothing has happened. Let me put it this way, The update is over ten years ago now. But in 1992 there was the Earth Summit, which I did not understand was a brainchild of WEF or I think it was probably Club of Rome. We were coming out of shock because it looked like Bush had just attacked Iraq for Oil, and so the timing was very good for this to come up about international governmental discussion about the environment.

In 2012 I listened to something about Earth Summit II from a twelve year old girl, who hadn't even been born for the first one. And her exact words were "everything is going backwards". And this remains relevant to the present moment.

Let's call it thirty years of watching the same basic discussion go nowhere, on a personal level for myself as well as the world political arena.



I heard you Shaberon :)

I added the six important points to even start thinking in becoming the resistance, it is not only about synthetic food, energy, communication, etc,.. it is really about everything we have today, but in order to do anything at least these 6 points make sense to have figured out, and even if that was figured out already, what would guarantee that this new "alternative society" (sorry for the lack of a better name) would prevail and keep flourishing? the civilian resistance movement could fail after certain point.. in the end it all boil down to who has more power and resources and the rest just have shut up and follow, after all it is democrazy. I maintain my opinion, we live in a rigged system and it will probably never change unless some group powerful enough do a really big noise and disband the crooks in charge today.

1. A loyal people who will support the effort at great risk to themselves.
2. Favorable terrain, and organization to fit particular terrain needs. A possible safe haven.
3. A source of adequate finances.
4. Good communications (radio, telephone, internet, satphone, telegraph, Morse code, whatever needed)
5. An adequate supply of food to support the units.
6. Support from an outside power ( most important ).

As you said "..but we don't really have the resources or ability to do much." and I fully agree with, but that does not mean we have to accept what they are pushing onto us. If the collective resistance movement seems too far-fetched so we have always the option to do on an individual basis or small group, like many cells spread around (that is the paradigm I am in at the moment - mutatis mutandis).

Modern food is designed to be like that, medicines are designed to be like that, education, energy, name it, these are all systems designed to be just like that, it is insanity try to change it.

For example, big pharma removes the active ingredient from a plant and they use it without all the other minerals supporting that plant, there is a reason everything in nature is packed together. These companies are selling illusion for people, they label it, do a great brainwashing marketing and viola you got a product. Above 90% of people will fall for it. Food and Medicine is the very same thing, they make you sick with one and provide a little cure with the other, but always making sure you remain sick and a good consumer. business as usual.

"Let's call it thirty years of watching the same basic discussion go nowhere, on a personal level for myself as well as the world political arena."

To be frank me too, but I know there is a way out of it if doing it small for yourself and the close ones, in a global scale there is nothing we can do, maybe a powerful group of people, but that will fall into those 6 important points mentioned above.

The WEF is just a club, but a powerful house that influences the world governments all together with their other partners, they got their own people inside politics all around, they do as they please, it is indeed all inverted. damn it!

[shaberon]

in order to do anything at least these 6 points make sense to have figured out, and even if that was figured out already, what would guarantee that this new "alternative society" (sorry for the lack of a better name) would prevail and keep flourishing? the civilian resistance movement could fail after certain point.. in the end it all boil down to who has more power and resources and the rest just have shut up and follow, after all it is democrazy. I maintain my opinion, we live in a rigged system and it will probably never change unless some group powerful enough do a really big noise and disband the crooks in charge today.

1. A loyal people who will support the effort at great risk to themselves.
2. Favorable terrain, and organization to fit particular terrain needs. A possible safe haven.
3. A source of adequate finances.
4. Good communications (radio, telephone, internet, satphone, telegraph, Morse code, whatever needed)
5. An adequate supply of food to support the units.
6. Support from an outside power ( most important ).



So this is multiple things. It is why I would not promote Antifa because it has no viable agenda or platform. Violently breaking everything and possibly removing the courts is just plain dangerous.

If you are removing poor leaders, that would be a Purge, which means you would largely be keeping the same system or Constitution. One can say that in the 2000s Russia performed an effective Purge. They are tweaking and cleaning the same system.

Anything else would change your relationship to it, such as withdrawal/rebellion, Revolution (destroy it) or Civil War (assume control of it as a Tyrant). It is possible any of those could be bloodless.

It could also be stumble drunk. The American Revolution didn't exactly have an End Game. It wasn't quite a revolution because they did not destroy the British government. It lacked a destiny, and you see that it took several years afterwards to come up with a Constitution.

A better program would have to have a good picture of what it was trying to set up.

I personally would be hyper critical about #1 but it is easy to know you will get bigger numbers of people with money and food. Inversely I can't provide it. On the individual level, yes, the general principle of boycott versus selective acquisition is something I try to do and recommend.





In terms of being in league with WEF ideas, there is the bloc of Republican states who have kicked Black Rock out of their finances for this reason.

I don't think anyone has ever taken for example the Constitutions of countries like Iran or China that are restrictive on that type of banking power in a comparative study of places that do.

I also don't think anything western is going the be successful through the U. N., not any kind of one world currency or government, that is simply finished.

I am also a pretty strong believer in the die off principle. Like there isn't exactly going to be another Klaus Schwab. Similarly the Rockefeller heirs are simply not interested in some of their father's ventures. And so a section of that voice will break down.

[palehorse]

So this is multiple things. It is why I would not promote Antifa because it has no viable agenda or platform. Violently breaking everything and possibly removing the courts is just plain dangerous.

If you are removing poor leaders, that would be a Purge, which means you would largely be keeping the same system or Constitution. One can say that in the 2000s Russia performed an effective Purge. They are tweaking and cleaning the same system.

Anything else would change your relationship to it, such as withdrawal/rebellion, Revolution (destroy it) or Civil War (assume control of it as a Tyrant). It is possible any of those could be bloodless.

It could also be stumble drunk. The American Revolution didn't exactly have an End Game. It wasn't quite a revolution because they did not destroy the British government. It lacked a destiny, and you see that it took several years afterwards to come up with a Constitution.

A better program would have to have a good picture of what it was trying to set up.

I personally would be hyper critical about #1 but it is easy to know you will get bigger numbers of people with money and food. Inversely I can't provide it. On the individual level, yes, the general principle of boycott versus selective acquisition is something I try to do and recommend.



Well yes, it can be used to do nefarious, villainous, degenerate, corrupt things, just like the government is already doing, so not much different if you compare both sides (thugs). But I didn't mean things like Antifa, far from it geez, I am sorry if I couldn't express myself in a better way, but I really meant people with good intention and acting on good deeds to take over and assume control. The current representatives of the folks in most countries are acting on their own interest and on interest of the global establishment for a very long time, so it must come to a halt, I am in favor of that, but I don't promote things like Antifa either because they are part of the current mess, they aren't changing anything.




In terms of being in league with WEF ideas, there is the bloc of Republican states who have kicked Black Rock out of their finances for this reason.

I don't think anyone has ever taken for example the Constitutions of countries like Iran or China that are restrictive on that type of banking power in a comparative study of places that do.

I also don't think anything western is going the be successful through the U. N., not any kind of one world currency or government, that is simply finished.

I am also a pretty strong believer in the die off principle. Like there isn't exactly going to be another Klaus Schwab. Similarly the Rockefeller heirs are simply not interested in some of their father's ventures. And so a section of that voice will break down.




That is great they kicked Black Rock out, it is a good signal.

I think regarding China there is "stuffs" in the wild, I remember a case of Jack Ma, trying to pull off a fintech (money) scheme and he was barred by the communist party, years ago. The communist party in China has the last word, business in China do as they were told to do as far as I know.

Seems like they are in full blow with their DPI (digital public identification) thing in order to bring the digital ID into all countries. They want to be done with that by 2028, in cases like that I don't see how boycott will be effective, because they turned that table against the people, the system is boycotting you, if you do not comply with the system.. I see it as a silly game and of course there is always ways around, so I am not very concerned about it anymore, but the majority of people will just jump in and give up everything.. and since the whole thing works because the "majority" accepted or the majority was persuaded to accept, so this thing becomes the new normal.

See how they are trying to convince people in Thailand to get their digital wallet? Giving them money inside that wallet, it is around 10.000 THB which is the basic income salary in the country. it is already up, but they had problems with deployment so the thing is off right now, but the project exist and was up.. there is resistance here, but very little for what I can say.

Yes you are correct the die off principle will take care of it, but these horrible beings they have already a bunch of trainees, and prepared new horrible guys coming up as soon they go to hell.. I don't know it is all a great mess and most of the time it is very overwhelming to get a clear picture out of it.


What I can say in a more positive way to anyone reading this thread, prepare for the best of your abilities, we don't really know how it will play out, and more you look into it, more confusing it become. So peace brothers and sisters, and lets do the best we can to ourselves and our loved ones.

[shaberon]

But I didn't mean things like Antifa, far from it geez, I am sorry if I couldn't express myself in a better way, but I really meant people with good intention and acting on good deeds to take over and assume control.


I didn't mean you personally were Antifa--apologies if that sounded directed at anyone--was just meant as an example of "no platform".

Because it stands for Anti-Fascist, it *sounds* like something I, personally, would want, but that is half true. It is like some Russian Nihilists; they believed in destroying a system because "systems" are inherently evil and "people" are naturally good. In general, that is naive. It could be adequate in small communities, which are closer so far to what we have talked about. Revolution against a national government on the "principle" that people are good is not really satisfactory; I do not know of any example. Maybe some of the Tyrants in a few Greek City-States if they did it by mass popular support.

The opposite of "good" appears to be letting the wealthy and the financiers enjoy privileges and protection.

Chinese communism is strictly against that.

The definition of "good government" is against that, but in modern times we would have to search harder for other examples.

I am not sure I find a Digital ID particularly threatening, in and of itself. If used as a "gating" method for where you can go, or what you can buy, etc., that would be ridiculous. A chip implanted in a human being is preposterous. Compared to the forces that are already in play, it is not a problem.

We already have "bad governments" staffed by those obsessed with Fundamentalism.

I am not sure the U. S. is "fixable" were the Capitol to become populated by Saints. What does one do with a $34T Debt? It can't be paid. Revolution or collapse are the possibilities. This is just mathematical. Talking about it as if it had a viable future sounds moot. With just a quick look at Debt by country (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_external_debt), every individual American is about $100K in public debt.

An Irishman? $628,505.

A Chinese? $1,736.


The table is like a who's who of the older central banks, particularly private ones.

When the charges are in ridiculous numbers of thousands per individual, and the Debt is more than the GDP, that can't possibly be good.

BRICS countries are pretty reasonable.

Such figures are the major factor that starts wars and revolutions.

There are other reasons, but this one is inevitable. It concerns that construct known as a "state". A "state" is not a Nation because a Nation is a culture, not a construct. I personally have no Nation because next to nothing is culturally shared with others around me. Some Nations have no state (e. g. Kurdish, Navajo).


On this issue is why Europe is cracked, or different. It owes to extreme Temporal power of the Pope. The Byzantine Patriarch has no power, he just has, so to speak, National influence by determining matters within the church, which the state, king, or emperor has nothing to do with. The Pope has been knocked out of power only relatively recently, after all those systems having spawned from those ways, then by the use of the state, power shifted to Finance. This was after the course of numerous religious wars. Orthodoxy hasn't got *any* of that.

Almost all of the European countries are out of the papistry, and the U. S. isn't really any different; if "freedom of religion" was a life-or-death issue for them, in the Orthodox countries, it is irrelevant. Nothing to combat. Not possible for them to support Zionism either.

I read the same story about moving to Russia from a farmer and an Orthodox priest. The farmer, of course, had something to say about much better value than in America to get some land, equipment, and start a business, but they were both pleased about the maintenance of "traditional values". And the farmer and nobody else is bothered about having to become Orthodox or marginalized because they are not. So it is *still* rather like the early America, whereas, here, everything Thomas Jefferson warned us about has happened.

[ExomatrixTV]

quote: "They label us ‘tin hat wearers’, ‘conspiracy theorists’, ‘lunatics’, ‘anti-vaxxers’ ‘climate deniers’ ‘anti-science’ and even ‘terrorists’! But who are we really?

We are the ones that care more than others think it’s wise, the ones that risk more than others think it’s safe, that dream more than others think it’s practical and expect more than others think it’s possible.

That is who we are. That is what separates us from the rest. And it all starts with the fact that we care…

We care that we’re being lied to by an entire system created for that purpose. We care that through the lies they have manipulated us to accept and perpetuate our own enslavement. We care that innocent people suffer daily because of this. We care that children are being mentally and physically abused. We care that we are being poisoned through the air, the food and the water. We care that medicine was hijacked by Big Pharma drug lords for making money, instead of healing. We care about human trafficking and child exploitation, in fact we care so much, it breaks our hearts daily.

We care about saving others, we care to want to change things, we care to dream of better alternatives, and we care to pray each day that we may turn things around for our children’s sake.

We care for justice, we care for freedom, we care for what is right, and we care enough to do something about it.

Caring is what drives our courage, it’s what makes us dream big and what pushes us to demand better.

So never stop caring, it’s what makes us who we are. It’s what separates the asleep from the awake, the righteous from the immoral, the courageous from the cowards, the strong from the weak and the faithful from the hopeless.

Never stop caring my friends… It’s the beginning of all good things". unquote

* #LauraAboli (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/lauraaboli)❤️
* Laura Abolion: Rumble (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Laura%20Aboli) - Bitchute (https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=laura%20aboli&kind=video&sort=new) - Odysee (https://odysee.com/$/search?q=Laura%20Aboli) - Twitter (https://twitter.com/search?q=Laura%20Aboli%20&src=typed_query) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22Laura+Aboli%22&sp=EgIIBA%253D%253D)

Having a conspiracy theory is not that different from having a crime theory ... so who exactly benefits if certain crime theories are not further investigated and systematically downplayed & marginalized?

* If a conspiracy is (partly) in the open does NOT make it any less criminal nor less harmful ...


Funny how all WEF (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118748-Top-10-Creepiest-Most-Dystopian-Things-Pushed-By-The-World-Economic-Forum) Cartel Parties in the Netherlands 🇳🇱 are actually RADICAL "normalizing insanity 24/7" calling it: "The New Normal" then from their perspective ANYTHING that is against their radicalism is called: "radical" :facepalm:

The same people who laughed at & ridiculed anyone who exposes the "The Great Reset (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111148-The-Great-Reset)" aka "Build Back Better" WEF (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118748-Top-10-Creepiest-Most-Dystopian-Things-Pushed-By-The-World-Economic-Forum) ... Agenda 2030 (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?111148-The-Great-Reset) ... The same people who did not apologize when almost all predictions made last 3 years became reality which they saw as "radical conspiracy theories" meanwhile almost everything has become a reality and no "SORRY YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG" from them!

It was Thierry Baudet (https://www.youtube.com/@ForumforDemocracy/videos) who was officially the first Dutch 🇳🇱 Politician ever on record who brought up: WEF/"Build Back Better"/Great Reset/Klaus Schwab/Agenda2030 in the Dutch 🇳🇱 Parliament 3 years ago !! ... and at the time that was considered "radical "unfounded" & "dangerous" conspiracy theories ... 2 years later through the Dutch 🇳🇱 Freedom Of Information Act (WOB (https://english.ctgb.nl/topics/transparancy)) internal Dutch Government communications with WEF/Klaus Schwab were made public ... meanwhile NO PUBLIC VINDICATION was allowed they (totally corrupt mainstream media) still hold on to their own pushed tunnel vision narratives, hoping you fall for their Psychology of Totalitarianism (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?119992-The-Psychology-of-Totalitarianism) by repeating their "spins" and their new made up pushed talking points. If anyone does ... it is PATHETIC beyond belief.

You see, almost ALL "default responses" (serving the WEF (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118748-Top-10-Creepiest-Most-Dystopian-Things-Pushed-By-The-World-Economic-Forum) pushed narratives) can easily be countered as most of them are victims of sophisticated PsyWars without realizing it >>> thinking they are "good people (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120761-The-nature-of-evil-in-the-modern-world&p=1548367&viewfull=1#post1548367)" assuming they have a "moral high ground" meanwhile not living in brutal self-honesty (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?122223-Can-You-Truly-Be-Happy-Without-Self-honesty).

Never ever am I "impressed" by ANYONE who is promoting and/or repeating government talking points with their WEF (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118748-Top-10-Creepiest-Most-Dystopian-Things-Pushed-By-The-World-Economic-Forum) pushed tunnel vision narratives ... That should never be a reason to be silent, how they demonize & marginalize REAL opposition!

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/27474914.f5b631e7.160x160o.f6c78faaf102@2x.png (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/johnkuhles)

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/johnkuhles) aka 'ExomatrixTV' 🦜🦋🌳
November 20th, 2023

[shaberon]

we care so much, it breaks our hearts daily.


That's true.

This for example negates the Antifa non-platform.

To the extent I am against something, I am also for something. It would be a type of wholesomeness my society has not been able to foster.




Having a conspiracy theory is not that different from having a crime theory ...


No, but the concern is also the whole issue of influence and power, as housed within legal mechanisms. And so I, at least, consider myself resistant to a certain mentality, which expresses itself in a few different ways. The technical definition of many crimes means less to me than the motive. Back to the example of Yemenis seizing ships, I would not press charges. I don't care about that, while I do care, for example, even if it is legal, for the National Endowment for Democracy to manufacture Ukrainian propaganda.

If, in the process, most of what I have to say is really sharp and cold, well, sorry, it is in response to something that has effectively genocided hundreds of millions primarily of the kind known as "poor people", and so I am fresh out of sympathy for overlooking the seriousness of the affair.

The main benefit of our working our way through it, if that manages to happen, would be for someone else, not me. I will outlive those figureheads of a bygone generation such as Biden and Schwab are both eighty, and even if the status quo shifts to a more equitable and prosperous era, it would really be for someone else's kid and then I would be gone.

[Denise/Dizi]

There are both pros and cons with meats that are "created" versus those that are naturally raised and grown. Firstly however, there is nothing "Natural" about the meats that most people consume, they are fed on farms that keep them in perpetual limitations of their intake, there is no "Natural grazing", and as such, disease and illness is common, and the actual vitamins and minerals we get from said meats, are limited to those that these animals absorb, which is probably very little at this point. We are more likely to be eating antibiotics, steroids, and other things versus actual healthy animals...

Th good prt about creating meats is they can be printed or grown to have an abundance of needed vitamins and minerals, ones that we are surely lacking these days. There are of course, those that still hunt their own wild meat... In which case, they are in a much better position that the rest of us, whom are consuming more pesticides than vitamins in our vegetables, etc.. And meats that have many nutrients that we just aren't getting these days in our daily diet.

I think it should all come down to choice however. There are some who do still care what they feed their bodies...

[palehorse]

I didn't mean you personally were Antifa--apologies if that sounded directed at anyone--was just meant as an example of "no platform".

Because it stands for Anti-Fascist, it *sounds* like something I, personally, would want, but that is half true. It is like some Russian Nihilists; they believed in destroying a system because "systems" are inherently evil and "people" are naturally good. In general, that is naive. It could be adequate in small communities, which are closer so far to what we have talked about. Revolution against a national government on the "principle" that people are good is not really satisfactory; I do not know of any example. Maybe some of the Tyrants in a few Greek City-States if they did it by mass popular support.

... every individual American is about $100K in public debt.

An Irishman? $628,505.

A Chinese? $1,736.


The table is like a who's who of the older central banks, particularly private ones.

When the charges are in ridiculous numbers of thousands per individual, and the Debt is more than the GDP, that can't possibly be good.
...
BRICS countries are pretty reasonable.
...



Thanks Shaberon, Absolutely the name sounds like something, but all I can imagine when names like antifa, blm, new kkk comes up, are figures like Albert Pike, George Soros and the most evil on earth comes to mind with their ideologies.. and it expand all around the world like in middle east, then you have ISIS, Hizballah, Hamas, Boko Haram, al-Qa’ida, IJ, Taliban, and so on the list is huge.. south America you got things like FARC, ELN, SL and lots of small factions too, all funded by the left on those countries + international funding, the US was funding South American and Caribbean countries for the existent treat of ISIL/ISIS back then.. they were helping these countries because the mentioned groups are already infiltrated there, so they fund both side of the same war, always been like that everywhere you look.

All fabricated and funded by the "good guys". Nothing much to say about it, but there is a pattern and we can recognize it, so their game is tight.



Interesting numbers per capita, thanks for that info too.

[palehorse]

There are both pros and cons with meats that are "created" versus those that are naturally raised and grown. Firstly however, there is nothing "Natural" about the meats that most people consume, they are fed on farms that keep them in perpetual limitations of their intake, there is no "Natural grazing", and as such, disease and illness is common, and the actual vitamins and minerals we get from said meats, are limited to those that these animals absorb, which is probably very little at this point. We are more likely to be eating antibiotics, steroids, and other things versus actual healthy animals...

Th good prt about creating meats is they can be printed or grown to have an abundance of needed vitamins and minerals, ones that we are surely lacking these days. There are of course, those that still hunt their own wild meat... In which case, they are in a much better position that the rest of us, whom are consuming more pesticides than vitamins in our vegetables, etc.. And meats that have many nutrients that we just aren't getting these days in our daily diet.

I think it should all come down to choice however. There are some who do still care what they feed their bodies...



That is the truth about meat today, many thanks to put in that way.

Weeks ago I was trying to figure out a possible "perfect shake" for the day and here is what I came up with and it does not taste bad, still working to improve the taste.


Ingredients

Turmeric: For its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, along with a modest range of vitamins and minerals.
Spirulina: High in protein, vitamins, particularly B-vitamins, and minerals like iron and magnesium.
Moringa Oleifera: Known for its rich variety of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants.
Chlorella: Similar to spirulina, rich in protein, vitamins, minerals, and chlorophyll.
Kale: High in vitamins A, C, K, and several B-vitamins, and minerals like calcium, potassium, and magnesium.

1 teaspoon spirulina powder
1 teaspoon chlorella powder
1 teaspoon moringa powder
1/2 teaspoon turmeric powder
1 cup fresh kale leaves
1 banana (for sweetness)
1/2 apple (for sweetness and texture)
1 tablespoon lemon juice (to enhance turmeric absorption)
1 cup almond or oat milk
A pinch of black pepper (to enhance turmeric absorption)

Optional: honey for extra sweetness and ice cubes if you like it cool.

[shaberon]

...figures like Albert Pike...


On this, it is a distortion, in the class of the Taxil Hoax and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Pike himself was like nothing. Mazzini however was more like the axle around which the whole ring of terrorism revolves.

The basic distinction among French Revolutionaries is Moderates and Radicals, i. e. Moderate supports a Revolution, but, aggression is pretty specifically on government targets and for a reason. Mazzini propagated Radicals everywhere, i. e. Antifa-like, or violence for hire, just as soon for the purposes of spreading panic. The American Revolution mostly just attacked the British military, whereas in France, what might have been somewhat contained was co-opted by multiple factions.




...they fund both side of the same war, always been like that everywhere you look.

All fabricated and funded by the "good guys". Nothing much to say about it, but there is a pattern and we can recognize it, so their game is tight.


To an extent. But as you mentioned, any independent-izing group needs some form of external support.

It is possible there can be a "different side", which, necessarily, draws from the same resources. For example in the recent West African coups, the regimes had American training and assistance. And they...turn around and promptly dispose of this American and French influence.

The actual "being on both sides" is a matter of degree, which is astonishing in terms of World War II.

Since then, yes, a great deal of things have definitely been provoked by the United States, which had in mind the elimination of a side. If I don't believe that is "good", they cannot interest me in participating.

[Denise/Dizi]

That is quite the morning shake there! I once suffered from cysts on my ovaries, and began to get them elsewhere as well, until I ran into a gentlemen who looked at me one day and asked if I was well. He was able to see, merely by looking at me that something in my body was not right.. I was aging faster than I should, had gained a few pounds, and I was always tired. I later learned that I had MS.. But at that time I did not know this.

This man suggested he was a homeopathic Dr. and because he wasn't licensed, he would give me a few ideas, but it would be up to me to take them.. If I chose to.. He kept it simple, stating that most can't stick to any extreme changes, and maintain the new changes... And really, I would have kept up the routine indefinately had it not been so dang expensive... He suggested I take four things...

Chlorella
DMAE
Co Q 10
Ester C

I had never even heard of any of those things at the time.. And I did take them.. The result was nothing less than miraculous... The cysts I did have, began to disappear, and they never returned... And I was able to save my second ovary as a result... Having lost the right one to surgery... I was able to have a second child as a result...

Eventually I did stop taking everything... and I really should start again... and I do take some supplements, but for many life is extremely busy, and just getting to the health food store to get those ingredients, can be troublesome... I found tumeric and I do take that to help with inflammation... And the blue green algae is amazing if you can drink it...

The earth does provide for us to be healthy, if we just know what to intake...

About the title of the thread, "The Resistance"...

The words alone speak volumes... We must not participate, and in fact resist those things which we know are not good for us... We must stop buying the easy meals that have no nutritional content... We must stop buying the pharmecuticals, unless necessary to live, and instead eat better for better health to start. We have to RESIST.... And it doesn't mean wars, it means not supporting such things with our efforts or money, as that is the only thing that will force them to make positive changes...

If they can't sell it, they will try to force it upon us... But until that time, resisting the "easy way out" is really the first place we must start. It really does start with some self responsibility and self control... Kudos to you for taking care of yourself.. it's not very easy these days...

[shaberon]

About the title of the thread, "The Resistance"...

The words alone speak volumes... We must not participate, and in fact resist those things which we know are not good for us...


If so, would it be the case for an Agricultural Economy as known by a French idea (https://www.hetwebsite.net/het/schools/physioc.htm):



The rulers of Baden, Sweden, Tuscany, Poland, Russia, Austria and even the United States, consulted the Physiocrats. The high-water mark of their influence was Jacques Turgot's brief tenure as contrôleur général of France from 1774 to 1776. Under Turgot, many of the Physiocratic policy propositions -- e.g. the lifting of internal tariffs, the abolition of the corvée, the single tax -- were instituted.


France got rid of it.

Instead it is found in the second period of reforms by Maria Theresa 1763-1780 (https://www.britannica.com/place/Austria/Reforms-1763-80):



The basically mercantilist policy of Charles VI’s reign and earlier was revised in line with the influence of physiocratic and so-called populationist theories (see physiocrat). Thenceforward human labour, and not precious metal, was gradually to become the yardstick of national wealth. This led, on the one hand, to restrictions on emigration and, on the other, to an easing of some imports that were not considered competitive with domestic industries.

This idea remains in Austria (https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/higgs/physiocrat.pdf):



A more serious interest in the Physiocrats was taken by Leopold II,
Grand Duke of Tuscany, afterwards Emperor of Austria, to whom
Mirabeau had dedicated Les Économiques, 1769–1772. He carried out
some of their reforms in practice, ordered his ministers to consult with
Mirabeau, and corresponded with Du Pont. Stanislas of Poland, Charles
III of Spain, the Emperor Joseph II, Ferdinand of Naples are also to be
mentioned among their adherents. A tribute to the fashionable craze
for the “Agricultural System” was the ceremony performed by the Dauphin at Versailles, 15th June 1768, when he publicly “held the plough”—
a toy bedecked with ribbons. The Emperor Joseph more sturdily drove a
peasant’s plough in Moravia, 19th August 1769.

Du Pont classes Carl Friedrich and Leopold (brother of
Marie Antoinette) among the followers of Quesnay; Joseph II with Turgot
and Adam Smith...

In the long run, the ideological adversary destroys Austria.

In the early United States it opposed Wall Street (https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/before-the-fed):



In particular, he was impressed with the Bank of England, which had performed well as the central bank for a growing British Empire since it was established in 1694.

Hamilton saw its potential to rival the great powers of Europe. To achieve that, he developed a complex financial plan to help the country grow economically. The plan included establishing tariffs and other taxes for federal revenue, repaying the Revolutionary War debt acquired by the Continental Congress and all the states, chartering a national bank, and creating a national currency.

Jefferson, on the other hand, saw a different economic future for the new republic. He put more faith in an agriculture-based economy of yeoman farmers. He saw the benefits of large cities in terms of the culture and sophistication they engendered, but viewed them as fountains of corruption as well. He also considered industrial growth and the concentration of economic power in institutions such as banks as potential threats to liberty. Banks were particularly problematic for Jefferson since they encouraged speculation rather than making their money from honest labor, and he believed they tended to concentrate power in near monopolies.

Jackson:

https://www.federalreservehistory.org/-/media/images/essays/before_the_fed/before_the_fed_2.jpg



Here, again, eventually run over by industrialism.

It seems to me there was an intent in Europe and America to restrain the abilities of a Bank, and, I think, agriculturalism has to do with the use of turmeric and other things. Something is lost besides a "historical economic theory"?

Around the 1760s, math was being used for the first time, to make up and compare production charts and so forth, and so of course we have to consider individual policies as "experimental". But on the whole, it seems to have more to do with a more robust way of life than industrialism driven by warmongering capitalists.

That's my understanding, is that, of course, there was a type of common-sense version of finance and politics on both continents, and with a push of a domino effect of sweeping it away, you get the events to the present day.

Which brings us to:



If they can't sell it, they will try to force it upon us...


That is, the same crony system, over and over.

Benefit of the few.

Most likely it will attempt a disguise. "Politically correct" was perhaps such an attempt but now it will take something sweeter.

[Denise/Dizi]

WOW, I applaud your effort to document that path which led us here... Surely there were those that wanted nothing more than power, and control... And to shape our world as they felt would benefit the few... And those that saw the pitfalls along the way who knew that it wouldn't end up well overall.

When powerful nations rise and fall as the axis of power, they must also take into consideration their own wealth and resources... As many nations have been overrun by trying to establish a peaceful and idealistic lifestyle all throughout history... It generally doesn't fare well in the end for the peaceful people, as they are ill prepared to fight on any large scale.

Typically a large and powerful military is the best thing, to avoid falling into the control of others, but when those at the top who are corrupt, are also controlling said military... well... You can see that problem...

The playing field is large, the number of players vast... But it does come down to a few at the top...

A good example is large nations bribing their way into smaller ones to tap their resources, with great promises of prosperity that again, only benefit the few... It happens all the time... And always will, so long as we have the same systems we have now, of division, power, wealth barriers, and corruption.

It seems we have hit a point in our history now, where rather than nations remaining strong in character, we have quite an even playing field of power hitters spread very evenly around the world, all willing to play the same game... (The game of corruption for the most part)... And as such, they have gained quite the momentum more recently in their efforts to tighten the noose around the general population of the planet.

In short, I don't have the answers... Seeing the problems, and finding a working solution is easier said than done.

[shaberon]

Typically a large and powerful military is the best thing, to avoid falling into the control of others, but when those at the top who are corrupt, are also controlling said military... well... You can see that problem...


Exactly the case in point. If we look at Austria, the rationale is that they were horrified by what happened in France, and then they had to fight Napoleon. Some of them got edgy about the cause of "nationalism" and so when the assassination happened in Sarajevo, they tried to suppress Serbia, failed ultimately and got a world war. At the same time, Russia got the Bolsheviks.


And we can see this rejected in a post the other day quoting Alexander Dugin (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114491-WW3-Ukraine-US-vs.-Donbass-Russia&p=1588298&viewfull=1#post1588298) who summarizes his adversaries as Capitalism and Communism.

That is the Left and Right of our political echo chamber made out of the thing Jackson suppressed.

Austria was not like the industrialist capitalist countries who were "pressing forward", it tried to review and study the newer financial and political ideas and work it in suitably to what was still an Agricultural Economy. This was still the case when the Serbian problem blew up and the system was shattered. Kaunitz of Austria is one of the few you will find telling the aristocrats it was their job to re-invest in the local economy.

The close kindred are not Bolshevik Socialists, but evidently what you might call White Russians, Tsarists or at least those who understand the unifying principle of it.

So if you put it together, that means, the Spirit of 1776 was a type of shared understanding between several American Founders, France, Austria, and Russia. Not the same in all details, but generally favorable towards agriculture and the aspect of well-being.

This was overthrown in France almost immediately, and the other places about the same time. Russia has turned itself around, according to the description. We can also be told that by American farmers moving there.






A good example is large nations bribing their way into smaller ones to tap their resources, with great promises of prosperity that again, only benefit the few... It happens all the time... And always will, so long as we have the same systems we have now, of division, power, wealth barriers, and corruption.


Fish Justice (Matsya Nyaya (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matsya_Nyaya)) in India.

I believe it comes back unless actively prevented.




In short, I don't have the answers... Seeing the problems, and finding a working solution is easier said than done.


Correct. That is what we call "real work".

Buddhism, Orthodoxy, and Masonry are all pretty similar in that none requires or advocates a particular government or a particular form of government.

They all face peace and social justice issues as a primary concern. Yet it is left to humanity to figure out and maintain its best standards. They can only inspire the ideal. All we have to go by is trial and error of "common agreements" (Diplomacy).

Europe has few examples other than Emperor Franz Josef who had a mostly peaceful reign for about forty-five years.

The counter proposal I tend to make would be like unwinding a series of errors.

I think what tends to happen is, mistakes are made, generations pass and the thing is forgotten. In actuality the difference between France and Austria is highly relevant to the current moment, particularly in terms of Banks.

With Austria out of the way, you then get what might be politely termed industrial self-government (https://irl.umsl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=cis), the cartels of internationalists, the next world war. Has this league led to, superior civilization, such as we are witnessing in Ukraine and Israel?


It is something like an "economic form" which is not actually necessary.

[Vicus]

Little country with BIG cojones... :muscle: (remember: WHO is one from many WEF tools...)

Slovakia Will Not Be Entering Into Any International Pandemic Agreements With WHO, Prime Minister Says November 30, 2023

https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Slovakia-Will-Not-Be-Entering-Into-Any-International-Pandemic-Agreements-With-WHO-Prime-Minister-Says.jpg

Comment

Intended to form part of international law, preparations for the creation of a World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Treaty began in 2001. Far from strengthening the prevention of, preparedness for, and response to future pandemics as the latest draft of the text claims, its implementation could severely undermine democracy by limiting the ability of national parliaments to make crucial healthcare decisions in the best interests of their citizens. Aided by proposed amendments to the so-called ‘International Health Regulations’ of 2005, the Pandemic Treaty threatens to transform the WHO into a global health dictatorship.

https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2023/11/slovakia-will-not-be-entering-into-any-international-pandemic-agreements-with-who-prime-minister-says/

[shaberon]

Slovakia Will Not Be Entering Into Any International Pandemic Agreements With WHO, Prime Minister Says November 30, 2023


The question is, how do I get there?


Really, though, the point is that all he has to do is not ratify it.

Then it stops at his doorstep.

If one *was* to accept the thing, then one takes on the responsibility of enforcing it.

Can't do much on its own. Obviously would be glad to give you the toolkit. If it becomes serious, I would imagine it turns into a guide for future migrations. At least I would consider myself highly repelled by anyone wanting to do that.

[palehorse]

...figures like Albert Pike...


On this, it is a distortion, in the class of the Taxil Hoax and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Pike himself was like nothing. Mazzini however was more like the axle around which the whole ring of terrorism revolves.

The basic distinction among French Revolutionaries is Moderates and Radicals, i. e. Moderate supports a Revolution, but, aggression is pretty specifically on government targets and for a reason. Mazzini propagated Radicals everywhere, i. e. Antifa-like, or violence for hire, just as soon for the purposes of spreading panic. The American Revolution mostly just attacked the British military, whereas in France, what might have been somewhat contained was co-opted by multiple factions.




...they fund both side of the same war, always been like that everywhere you look.

All fabricated and funded by the "good guys". Nothing much to say about it, but there is a pattern and we can recognize it, so their game is tight.


To an extent. But as you mentioned, any independent-izing group needs some form of external support.

It is possible there can be a "different side", which, necessarily, draws from the same resources. For example in the recent West African coups, the regimes had American training and assistance. And they...turn around and promptly dispose of this American and French influence.

The actual "being on both sides" is a matter of degree, which is astonishing in terms of World War II.

Since then, yes, a great deal of things have definitely been provoked by the United States, which had in mind the elimination of a side. If I don't believe that is "good", they cannot interest me in participating.



we got a huge issue with the funding part or external support, TPTB always get in the middle, their infiltration is basically at all levels of institutions and now they trying to invade our very own mind, the attack now is personal, it was subtle and now it is explicit, so the mitigation process should be personal and explicit too.

To mitigate things as a group, it would require a lot of organization by each individual, it is not an easy task, not even sure if it is possible, but I still have some faith on it.

If I was in power to decide and execute thing at this level, I would create a parallel society with only those who met the spiritual fingerprint of certain frequency that only good could operate in (what frequency is that? my clue is love), it would automatically repel the evil away. So we would end up with 2 very DISTINGUISHED society that would have nothing to do with each other. I know it sounds pretty far fetched, but what else could we do, other than develop unconditional love, everyone is capable of that, but some got so corrupted that they are literally rot from the inside, these are lost causes.

I wish I had a better answer, but regarding all these figures that came into existence and left behind their legacy of evil, people like Pike, Mazzini, Marx and others, they were ultimate enemies and betrayed their own meaning of existence, firstly they were pure intellectuals, and second all their centers got corrupted by evil. The world as we know is run by evil.

imagine those guys using their huge brains for good? I doubt we would be into this mess we are today.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

How long last a PM in Slovakia? that is the time until the next one change the agreement. It may be good for his term. The fight continues.......

[mountain_jim]

copying here


was not sure where to post this - may copy it elsewhere later

https://x.com/balajis/status/1731071942919352796?s=20

1731071942919352796


See new posts
Conversation
Balaji
@balajis
MORE POWER OVER FEWER PEOPLE

The US establishment is facing complete financial meltdown. As such it wants** to gain control over as much of the world’s finances as possible to pay its unpayable debts. Instead, it will likely exercise more power over fewer people.

Because the empire is imploding as quickly as its ambitions are expanding. Recall that Blue America has chosen the path of *simultaneous* conflict with tech, Trump, Russia, China, crypto, Bitcoin, and more — and it’s taking serious Ls on each of these fronts.

For example: they lost Twitter to Elon, they need to jail Trump to stop him, they’re losing in Ukraine, their sanctions aren’t working on China, their SEC is failing in court, and their best financiers — et tu, Blackrock? — are defecting to Bitcoin.

Blue America is also at war with itself internally, as the far left and center left tear each other apart over Israel/Gaza. And due to diversity quotas, many of the center left white-and-Asian guys who kept the party going were boxed out of the Biden administration, which has caused an underreported competency collapse.

Meanwhile, there is plenty of Dem-on-Dem violence within blue cities, where with total one-party control Blue America chose to cake their streets in feces — and caused a backlash as a result. Everyone from red governors like Ron DeSantis to blue mayors like Eric Adams now publicly states that blue cities are disasters.

I mean, just the fact that you can read this shows how much soft power Blue America has lost! Their censorship regime has a gaping hole in it thanks to
@elonmusk.

Recall how blues used to be utterly hegemonic even a few years ago, to the point that they’d jump you for a stray like. Now no one likes them but other blues, and only their hard power remains — which is enough to oppress those unfortunate to live under Blue America but fortunately not enough to oppress the world.

THE WAR ON CRYPTO
And that brings us back to the quote tweeted article.

Wally Adeyemo is one of the key people behind Treasury’s bright idea of seizing Russia’s reserves, which (a) pushed the ~85% of the world that didn’t sanction Russia into fast-track dedollarization and (b) revealed how fundamentally untrustworthy the US financial system is for any country that isn’t a DC pawn.

Not a particularly good outcome for a massively indebted country that needs foreigners to keep buying its bonds!

While the sanctions did cause damage for everyone involved, they weren’t enough to defeat the Russians. And now the establishment has signaled it’s giving up on Ukraine.

So they’re on to the next war — the fake war on crypto. Even as Biden sends billions to Iran, the regime is trying to blame terrorism on everyone other than themselves. Just like when they printed the money, caused the inflation, and blamed it on corporations.

Of course, blaming Subway sandwiches for inflation is as moronic as scapegoating stablecoins for terrorism. So why are they doing it?

Because the pathological liars of this regime still believe they rule the world and can ram through these false narratives without pushback.

But they are losing control inside and outside the US. What’s actually happening is that only the most brainwashed blues still listen to them. And that should be what happens to these global crypto proposals: only the most brainwashed blue companies and countries should listen to them.

Everyone else should find ways to break free — mentally, socially, financially, geopolitically. Leaving Blue America to wield more power, but over fewer people.

** When I say “it wants”, I’m not saying that Biden or even anyone in Treasury fully understands this. Biden ain’t Stalin, he’s barely even speakin’! But think of Blue America as an ant colony, as a metaorganism that has an evolved logic to it. Even if any one ant in the colony doesn’t really understand what it’s doing, even if each NPC is mostly just mimicking their neighbors, the colony as a whole can organically coordinate.

[Vicus]

Consumers are Rejecting "The Great Reset"

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol5/greatreset257_01_small.jpg
Electrical vehicle chargers

A friend got a rental of a Tesla over the holidays. It's undoubtedly the industry standard for EVs and a complete blast to drive.

The problem:

It's not a practical car at all. He was driving in the cold, and the car was nearly drained after two hours.
Searching for a charge was no easy task.
The first one didn't work. The second one stated that it would be charged in 10 hours, which he didn't have. The third one charged in one hour but that was a full hour wasted.
His conclusion:

This is indeed a glorified golf cart designed to keep you at home and under the thumb of the manufacturer. And this is just a test.
The repairs are worse. Keep in mind that this is the best the industry has to offer.

The other manufacturers of these things make products not nearly as highly rated, which is why so many of them are sitting on lots unsold and why orders for the machines are plummeting.
It seems like the EV craze has peaked already. Growth in gas cars is now far higher than electrics, flipping a trend from 12 months ago.
Finally, consumers are figuring it out.

This is a good second car, provided you're driving in your own town, you have a hook-up at home and can charge it overnight, and you don't suddenly have to go out of town.

It's a toy, sometimes a fun one, but not a real car... For that, you need gas.

The idea that this car is going to transition the United States to "clean energy" is absurd.

If every car were electric, the grid would crash and rationing would be the norm.

And maybe that's the whole point...

You drive only with permission.
Nothing about your transportation is within your control.
Authorities will decide everything for you.
It's a perfect strategy for creating a society of dependents.

Fortunately, consumers aren't playing along...
We still live with the remnants of a capitalist system whereby manufacturers have to make profits. So that's a serious problem for the whole industry. It could very well collapse in 2024...
Sure, Tesla will still be around making luxury cars and trucks for well-to-do urbanites, and bless them for it.
But it isn't for everyone.

It isn't even for anyone who has a long way to go...

Even now, the only substantial pockets of broad ownership (above 20 percent) are California and D.C.
The heartland knows better and so do people in very cold latitudes...

As long as we're on the topic of fails, consider fake meat.


Remember how it was going to replace real meat? Well, take a look at the grocery stores today.This is another product that has peaked.
The stock for Beyond Meat was $196 in 2019. It has fallen and fallen.Today it's a bargain at $8.72, with no one being particularly interested.
It looks like this one isn't long for this world either, which makes you wonder why muckety-mucks are still pushing this nonsense on us.
Consumers aren't having it anymore...

Markets in the real world are rejecting the "Great Reset"...!

Whether,

eating bugs

driving EVs

munching fake meat

living in the metaverse with censorship,

...none of it's working...! :chuckle:


We can only hope that this trend continues in 2024 and that it bankrupts the companies that threw themselves into the whole racket.
Let's hope the consumer marketplace can render its final judgment before all of this jazz becomes mandatory, which is the real goal.

In the meantime, let's be grateful for every amount of capitalism we have remaining, because markets mean consumer choice.

And when given the choice, we know now that consumers don't like Klaus Schwab's plans for our lives, no matter how much Bill Gates endorses them...

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica3/greatreset257.htm

[Vicus]

WHO’s Pandemic Treaty Is Dead – For Now

Update as of 2 June 2024

Today, 2 June 2024, the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA) ended without a vote on the Pandemic Treaty. WHO management, as well as their key country allies, realized that there were not enough votes for the two-thirds needed to ratify the treaty. In fact, that was already known before the begin of the WHA on 27 May 2024, but could only be confirmed today.

So, this was a partial gain for the People of the world. But only partial because the modified International Health Regulations (IHR), needing only an absolute majority, were just barely approved before close of the 77th WHA.

In the course of the last half a year, especially the past couple of months, they were significantly watered down. Still, they include enough hooks on which a newly formulated Pandemic Treaty could be attached.

That is why this partial People’s gain can only be partially celebrated. It means, the World Health Organization (WHO) will now be working on Plan B, namely redrafting a Pandemic Treaty, to be most likely debated during the UN General Assembly in September 2024, possibly in behind-closed-door sessions, as is usual for the non-transparent machinations of the over 80% privately-funded WHO.

Most of WHO’s private funding comes from Big Pharma, their “philanthropic” foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Big Tech and other interest groups.

WHO Director General (DG) and his advisory team have already announced that a special WHA with focus on the Pandemic Treaty will take place by the end of 2024.

Therefore, People, please do not rest and believe the danger is over. IT IS NOT by any means.

update from:

Last night (24 May 2024), in a high-level pre-World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting (17 May-1 June 2024), in Geneva, WHO management and key member country delegates decided to drop the Pandemic Treaty – for now. It would not stand a chance to pass a WHA vote in the coming week. Instead, they decided to discuss at the WHA what to do next.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/who-pandemic-treaty-dead-now/5858152