Saving the US Republic

[Bill Ryan]

Dear Friends, I figured this definitely deserved its own thread. This is an SGAnon interview with Dr. Sandy Miarecki, who I confess I'd never heard of before. But — trust me — this is a VERY VERY remarkable woman.

Listen to the first 10 minutes and you'll see. Guaranteed. :)

It may be related to some of the material that Derek Johnson has been discussing (see this thread (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120854-Derek-Johnson-says-Trump-could-still-be-the-legal-US-President)), but I did feel this was a topic of its own, dating back 150 years to 1871.

https://rumble.com/v56q4qj-7122024-sg-sits-down-w-usaf-ret.-lt-col-dr.-sandy-miarecki-to-discuss-the-r.html

(https://rumble.com/v56q4qj-7122024-sg-sits-down-w-usaf-ret.-lt-col-dr.-sandy-miarecki-to-discuss-the-r.html)SG Sits Down w/ USAF Lt Col (Ret) Dr. Sandy Miarecki to Discuss the Reinhabited Republic For These United States
v54dw1v

[Bill Ryan]

The websites:


https://RepublicForTheUnitedStatesOfAmerica.org



https://Members.RepublicForTheUnitedStatesOfAmerica.org

[Denise/Dizi]

Definately worth a weekend of watching, reading, and examining at length, to see if this is true. There has been rumblings of a turn over of the seats of power over the past decade... And it was never made clear if it was one country or the planet in it's entirety.

It makes a lot more sense why immigration (unabated, and in fact, being perpetuated) is happening now, why there is so much chaos happening, as those in seats of power try to make things far more difficult for those that are living in places that were hijacked a very long time ago... and try to change it

If indeed this has gone as far as it is claimed here that it has...

I know what I will be doing next weekend now... Thanks Bill!

[TrumanCash]

Thank you so much for starting this thread, Bill. We need solutions now and restoring the Republic (not the so-called "democracy", which is an illusion) is the best and most likely the only real solution we have at this time and place.

I am so tired of people referring to the "government" as a "democracy". Surprisingly, many of the so-called patriot celebrities and politicians use still use this word repeatedly and only rarely do they use the word "Republic".

I would ask them to read Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution for These United States, which states in pertinent part: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"

So what is the definition of a "Republican Form of Governent" (since it has nothing to do with the Republican Party.) According to Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (you have to look up "Government" first and the last entry is: "Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people [not "persons", btw] and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated."

So it appears that we have a choice--exercise our sovereignty directly or through elected representatives. if We the People choose to exercise our powers directly it would mean that we could make a "citizens arrest", right? But if we choose to exercise our sovereignty by choosing "representatives" does this definition imply we would then have given up our sovereignty? And what does the word "specially" mean in this context?

However it may be construed, wouldn't it be prudent to withdraw one's voter "registration" in order to assure that one has preserved and retained their personal sovereignty? In fact, I am one of many who have done just that and more.

I have taken constitutional issues into court and the prosecutors and judges (i.e., Bar Association Members) had no intention to acknowledge my sovereignty even though I had not harmed anyone. In fact, they had no intention to follow constitutional mandates. More on that later.

In the words of the Honorable Alfred E. Neuman: "America is that land which fought for freedom, then passed laws to get rid of it."

[meeradas]

Awesome.

Watched the whole of it. This is huge... and it is going to have global impact.

[ExomatrixTV]

reinhabitedrepublic.com (https://www.reinhabitedrepublic.com https://www.reinhabitedrepublic.com)



rumble.com/search/all?q=Dr. Sandy Miarecki (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Dr.%20Sandy%20Miarecki)
rumble.com/search/all?q=Jean Hertler (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Jean%20Hertler)
rumble.com/search/all?q=David Hertler (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=David%20Hertler)

The future is in the hands of the people, not the corporate government. Learn how to re-inhabit the Republic of The United States for America and continue our constitutional government, not the corporate government.


PDF (https://republicfortheunitedstatesofamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/PR950286671RUSA-15July2022.pdf)




It's Happening: The Re-inhabited Republic -- Col. Dr. Sandra Miarecki (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Dr.%20Sandra%20Miarecki):

v53rlwl/?pub=ir01b

[ExomatrixTV]

The Myth Of American Democracy | A Republic If You Can Keep It:

rGkAXOOyKfw


A Republic, If You Can Keep it: The First Printing of the U.S. Constitution:

wMsdmYjTI48
On the night of 16 September 1787, after 4 months of heated deliberation, the delegates to Constitutional Convention had set in print the very first copies of The United States Constitution. Without this magnificent document, created by key historical figures including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and Benjamin Franklin, the United States as we know it simply wouldn’t exist. This is one of only eleven surviving copies and one of just two not in an institutional collection.


IF YOU CAN KEEP IT - a A Mini Documentary on American's Ignorance of Their Political History:

v56l5tl/?pub=ir01b

[Chuck]

Wow!! :jaw:

A lot of new, ground breaking information here!! A must watch. Thanks Bill!

[shaberon]

I would ask them to read Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution for These United States, which states in pertinent part: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"

So what is the definition of a "Republican Form of Governent" (since it has nothing to do with the Republican Party.)


It is specifically meaningless.

The most profound extent would be "to prevent monarchy".



According to Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (you have to look up "Government" first and the last entry is: "Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people [not "persons", btw] and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated."


Black's Law Dictionary has absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution.



So it appears that we have a choice--exercise our sovereignty directly or through elected representatives. if We the People choose to exercise our powers directly it would mean that we could make a "citizens arrest", right? But if we choose to exercise our sovereignty by choosing "representatives" does this definition imply we would then have given up our sovereignty?


You have no sovereignty.

I can smell this.

It needs to be said that the 1871 legislation has created a local government for Washington, D. C.; it's a corporation. All municipalities are corporations.

The Federal Government is a Sovereign. The States are Sovereigns. Those are the only ones.

You do have a ca. 1871 judge's ruling that a "corporation" has the legal status of a "person". It is a bit insulting because the original Amendment was intended to overcome the prior understanding that a slave was 3/5 of a person. They actually believed this. The Amendment was supposed to protect former slaves from still being in a lower legal status--and, as far as I know, it was used for this defense *one* time.

That kind of privilege handed to the corporate power is perhaps your second problem.

Curiously, it is the Articles of Confederation that say they are permanent--the Constitution does not attempt to do this.

As usual, this sounds like what is behind the free legal advice:



At this time the Republic for the United States of America can only achieve its goals with the assistance of generous donations from the Americans that make up the body politic.


Did you know that we have a hereditary noble-esque order?

It's called Sons and Daughters of the Revolution.

I don't qualify because my ancestor served in a State Militia. The point of saying this is because it means my heritage is in the Revolution. That may not mean the same thing for others, but, in some cases it means the issues and discussions are passed down. And so my reaction would be that the plan offered is a Federal Empire of the highest rank.

Are they legitimately complaining against what you might call an "International Trans-Atlantic Empire", yes, of course.

But, let me try to explain why this is a hoax and why you are not a sovereign.

It's called the Revolutionary Oath.

What that means is, you swear to fight for us, or we throw you out.

When I started looking into this stuff, it took a while to percolate to my attention, but it means they are rejecting the Oath. It is hard to be less sovereign than to obey my command to go out where people are shooting at you. This is in opposition to the Crown. We didn't spill all this blood so that people would go around thinking they are personally independent. You have to be ready to be summoned at all times.

This lady has an interesting Linkedin (https://www.linkedin.com/in/sandy-miarecki-8232352b):



Fighting against military tyranny
Self-employed
Sep 2022 - Present 2 years

Multiple lawsuits and other legal actions against the Department of Defense, the US Air Force, the US Air Force Academy, for illegal mandates and coercion in violation of the Nuremberg Code


First impression is that is a Confession of a Frivolous Lawsuit Filer. An individual can't just go around trying to cite Nuremberg at someone. Or if you put "Air Force" as a defendant. You will be dismissed without further review.

Now, sure, if you actually *can* make a civil or criminal case, then go for it. However, any political point being raised along the way is most likely a modernized John Birch and if so I will dispute it.

[s7e6e]

Thanks Ryan. Australia is in the same boat.

[jaybee]

.

I've watched the OP presentation and trying to assimilate what this means - re the BIG picture...

I've been having the thought come in just lately that maybe the British didn't actually, or fully, succumb to the Revolution.. lose the American War for Independence - like how it is suspected that Hitler and Co. and the Nazis didn't actually, or fully, lose WW2 - just made a strategic withdrawal - dispersed .... regrouped and changed tactics...?

In other words are the British based Elite / aristocracy / globalists still basically in control of the USA..? still running the show...and have been for the last 100 + years....

Perhaps the info shared in the OP by Dr. Sandy Miarecki explains how they (the British and some other European Elites?) managed to eventually thwart the Revolution - and take back the most valuable piece of Real Estate the world has ever known..... by creating the State Corporations that usurped the Republic - this took them around 100 years to get done.... (1776 to approx 1871)..... it was all done so craftily most people had no idea and only now - after around another 100 + years is the next prolonged 'battle' in the War for Independence kicking off.... behind the scenes and without the muskets and rifles... < (for now anyway) ....

just having a little speculate.....

[TrumanCash]

I would ask them to read Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution for These United States, which states in pertinent part: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"

So what is the definition of a "Republican Form of Governent" (since it has nothing to do with the Republican Party.)


It is specifically meaningless.

The most profound extent would be "to prevent monarchy".



According to Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (you have to look up "Government" first and the last entry is: "Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people [not "persons", btw] and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated."


Black's Law Dictionary has absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution.



So it appears that we have a choice--exercise our sovereignty directly or through elected representatives. if We the People choose to exercise our powers directly it would mean that we could make a "citizens arrest", right? But if we choose to exercise our sovereignty by choosing "representatives" does this definition imply we would then have given up our sovereignty?


You have no sovereignty.

I can smell this.

It needs to be said that the 1871 legislation has created a local government for Washington, D. C.; it's a corporation. All municipalities are corporations.

The Federal Government is a Sovereign. The States are Sovereigns. Those are the only ones.

You do have a ca. 1871 judge's ruling that a "corporation" has the legal status of a "person". It is a bit insulting because the original Amendment was intended to overcome the prior understanding that a slave was 3/5 of a person. They actually believed this. The Amendment was supposed to protect former slaves from still being in a lower legal status--and, as far as I know, it was used for this defense *one* time.

That kind of privilege handed to the corporate power is perhaps your second problem.

Curiously, it is the Articles of Confederation that say they are permanent--the Constitution does not attempt to do this.

As usual, this sounds like what is behind the free legal advice:



At this time the Republic for the United States of America can only achieve its goals with the assistance of generous donations from the Americans that make up the body politic.


Did you know that we have a hereditary noble-esque order?

It's called Sons and Daughters of the Revolution.

I don't qualify because my ancestor served in a State Militia. The point of saying this is because it means my heritage is in the Revolution. That may not mean the same thing for others, but, in some cases it means the issues and discussions are passed down. And so my reaction would be that the plan offered is a Federal Empire of the highest rank.

Are they legitimately complaining against what you might call an "International Trans-Atlantic Empire", yes, of course.

But, let me try to explain why this is a hoax and why you are not a sovereign.

It's called the Revolutionary Oath.

What that means is, you swear to fight for us, or we throw you out.

When I started looking into this stuff, it took a while to percolate to my attention, but it means they are rejecting the Oath. It is hard to be less sovereign than to obey my command to go out where people are shooting at you. This is in opposition to the Crown. We didn't spill all this blood so that people would go around thinking they are personally independent. You have to be ready to be summoned at all times.

This lady has an interesting Linkedin (https://www.linkedin.com/in/sandy-miarecki-8232352b):



Fighting against military tyranny
Self-employed
Sep 2022 - Present 2 years

Multiple lawsuits and other legal actions against the Department of Defense, the US Air Force, the US Air Force Academy, for illegal mandates and coercion in violation of the Nuremberg Code


First impression is that is a Confession of a Frivolous Lawsuit Filer. An individual can't just go around trying to cite Nuremberg at someone. Or if you put "Air Force" as a defendant. You will be dismissed without further review.

Now, sure, if you actually *can* make a civil or criminal case, then go for it. However, any political point being raised along the way is most likely a modernized John Birch and if so I will dispute it.

It appears to me that you do not understand what "sovereignty" is. My sovereignty is not defined by the Constitution, recognized Law Dictionaries or anything else. Sovereignty is a viewpoint. It is a spiritual viewpoint. By spiritual, I do not mean it in the context of any Earth religion. It goes way beyond the Matrix in which we live. What happens to my body is irrelevant. I do not comply with the Matrix and I do not live in fear of it like the dumbed-down masses. I do not consent to the corrupt "legal" system or the insane mandates of Earth humans or any other beings. I know who I am as a spiritual being.

When I quote the Declaration of Independence, US Constitution and Black's Law Dictionary it is for the benefit of the dumbed-down normies as a place to start to gradually evolve out of their subservient victim viewpoint. They are not ready to understand the big picture because they have been programmed and they have blindly and obediently accepted their programming. They are stuck in "beliefs" and their "beliefs" prevent them from becoming truth seekers. Read my books then get back to me on this because you obviously don't know me and you do not know what I know.

[mountain_jim]

Anons, Q operation, Trump, The Storm, US Military all referenced by SG (the interviewer) at about 22 minutes in.



What you have described is a process post-9/11/2001 discussed as having come out of high-level military command (retired and active) to revert the US back to a lawful republic and away from a corporate maritime fiction. Essentially, we have accomplished most of the mechanics of that process.


She said "100% correct".



Earlier she mentioned this getting moving after the JFK op, I suspect this was part of what were referred to as white hats by earlier whistleblowers before the Trump/Q years.

31 minutes in - when the corporation falls, the military says 'Republic you are up' - we are up - we are the civil authority the military absolutely requires to not violate their oath of office

"Let's reinhabit the rest of republic as the US corporation is rapidly running out of time."

Intel: She in contact with a few insiders - mostly getting financial side. Apparently last week, Republic Trust got funding (indirectly)

Other recent intel: mostly National Guard will be the military conducting tribunals under Marshall Law because so much of regular military is compromised at highest levels

SG Question: How should American patriots honor the spirit of forefathers?

We all need to wake up to the fact that this is the We The People Government - where every single American gets involved with their government

13th amendment unlawfully deleted from Constitution

/////////

I would think that Patel Patriot's (https://x.com/patel_patriot) Devolution is related as part of this process and the Q op was part of the background awakening process required to enlist support and understanding for citizens to react and go forward non-violently.

Perhaps not all from a single 'self organizing collective' (as Clif would call it), but several efforts with the same or similar goals in mind.

[thepainterdoug]

I will be first to say, I dont understand much of this. The words yes, but the Republic, vrs a corporation, but what deems it a cooperation and separates it from the Republic and the country etc.

The ESQ, following a lawyer ?

How does this cross over with Q, Derek Johnson, and Trump, the seemingly only above board candidate to challenge this cabal of corruption of the far left.

I am all ears should anyone want to impart their knowledge . I will go to the sites.

ty
pd

[shaberon]

It appears to me that you do not understand what "sovereignty" is. My sovereignty is not defined by the Constitution, recognized Law Dictionaries or anything else. Sovereignty is a viewpoint. It is a spiritual viewpoint.


That's fine. It's a different subject.

One can have any viewpoint one chooses, while shooting the British, at the Governor's order.

That is what forms a State. A State is not a corporation. It is a Sovereign.

The rest of the post lost me, I admit.

Is anyone here speaking from the view of those who founded the States and are a bit disgruntled with the ensuing Republic?

A government can own and operate any number of corporations, but, only municipal governments actually *are* corporations. One of the main differences is that a corporation can be bankrupted. A Sovereign cannot.

Or, it is subject to a court's authority in general, it can be charged, or shut down, like a person, although unlike a person, it won't die of natural causes.


With expressions such as "surrender back to Britain", this is figurative. There's not quite an international command structure, because the countries are Sovereign. Instead, what we got is a freak ton of influence that became "agreed to". It may be illegal that the US Sec-Treasury was a Governor of the IMF, hence a "foreign agent", but this does not affect Federal Sovereignty.

The simple way of looking at it:


1694 -- Bank of England -- becomes particularly powerful due to an exclusive contract to handle government finances. It has been there ever since, impervious to what kind of king or form of government like the circus they have now.

1792 -- American National Bank -- a corporation that was terminated. In these times, charters automatically expired in twenty years. The business model existed, but it was heavily watched, and they were routinely broken up.

1865 -- American National Bank --immortal and permanent. This began the practice of loaning Treasury Bonds to the bank, which has been permanent ever since, which means -- it became the same type of creature as Bank of England.


For the most part, it is a done deal. Everything else is details, further modifications, about strengthening this regime. The root issues were before this, not after it.

So Republic 1789 was a rushed-through compromise which came with heavy warnings. Republic 1865 put everyone in bondage to the Bank ever since. A justification for this Republic, based on falsehood presented as fact, does not help its case. I've tried to admire it in sympathy, but, there isn't anything special that ever happened here as compared to anywhere else, other than defeating the British. Almost all of the debates and discussions were copied from France.

Jefferson advised us to expect a revolution every generation, and, there is almost no kind of government that has lasted more than about 300 years, so the current Federal thing seems far more questionable than sustainable. To keep it is to give $35T in debt to the children.

[ExomatrixTV]

1836041878354931746


twitter.com/RescueRepublic (https://twitter.com/RescueRepublic)

1835835877592793185
The "Rescue The Republic" website is: jointheresistance.org (https://jointheresistance.org)


It Begins...:

v5cti2d/?pub=ir01b

[ExomatrixTV]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXFtHCybAAAS4J_?format=jpg&name=large (https://jointheresistance.org/)

Meet some of our #RescueTheRepublic (https://twitter.com/hashtag/RescueTheRepublic?src=hashtag_click) lineup September 29, 2024 Washington:

https://bunny-wp-pullzone-cteumfvqig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/1570746377-qtjfpedw1zwsd0osrmyxhivemi2oe4i6gt0g2vm1l4.webp (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120744-Robert-F.-Kennedy-jr.-May-Run-for-Presidency-Challenging-Joe-Biden-2024)


Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
@RobertKennedyJr (http://x.com/@RobertKennedyJr)

https://bunny-wp-pullzone-cteumfvqig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/Screen-Shot-2024-06-26-at-6.36.19-PM-e1723155316615-qsbrzfqgkrgwot59orueys9v2jd5v41ai3cwqq92tk.png


Dr. bret weinstein
@BretWeinstein (http://x.com/@BretWeinstein)


https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2014-10/29/11/enhanced/webdr02/enhanced-buzz-32743-1414597585-27.jpg


Russell Brand
@rustyrockets (http://x.com/@rustyrockets)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/m-v7QEhHyN8/hqdefault.jpg


Dr. Jordan peterson
@jordanbpeterson (http://x.com/@jordanbpeterson)

https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/C5603AQERb4c_qv4yeg/profile-displayphoto-shrink_800_800/profile-displayphoto-shrink_800_800/0/1614777217283?e=1732147200&v=beta&t=XD5ba0H2PiVbH9Ju1wgDZcCEp2d5xEHvGqQ7_VtZtH8 (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?108976-Tulsi-Gabbard)


Tulsi Gabbard
@TulsiGabbard (http://x.com/@TulsiGabbard)

https://cdn.saleminteractivemedia.com/403/media/images/charlie-kirk-with-show-logo.png


Charlie Kirk
@Charliekirk11 (http://x.com/Charliekirk11)

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/10/31/1414774640777/3d7b7545-1b58-4927-b9fc-06dbb90b378f-2060x1236.jpeg?width=465&dpr=1&s=none


Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi (http://x.com/@mtaibbi)

https://pagesix.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/05/eric-bolling.jpg?quality=75&strip=all


Eric Bolling
@ericbolling (http://x.com/@ericbolling)

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjI3NTI1MzkzNF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNjQ0NTE0ODE@._V1_FMjpg_UY3840_.jpg


Del BigTree
@delbigtree (http://x.com/@delbigtree)

https://images.fandango.com/ImageRenderer/300/0/redesign/static/img/default_poster.png/0/images/masterrepository/performer%20images/596494/rob136784766.jpg


Rob Schneider
@robschneider (http://x.com/@robschneider)

https://www.newsinfo.ru/image/article/1/3/1/32131.jpeg


Col. Douglas Macgregor (ret.)
@DougAMacgregor (http://x.com/@DougAMacgregor)

https://mms.businesswire.com/media/20150909006550/en/485012/4/lara_logan_hi.jpg


Lara Logan
@LaraLogan (http://x.com/@LaraLogan)

https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/clicksummits.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/232/2023/03/29184214/10.png


Dr. Robert Malone
@RWMaloneMD (http://x.com/@RWMaloneMD)

https://s36797.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Pierre-Kory-845-x-500-main.jpg


Dr Pierre kory
@PierreKory (http://www.x.com/@PierreKory)

https://bunny-wp-pullzone-cteumfvqig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/TNJETPROMO-1-e1724767915781.avif


Tennessee JET
@TennesseeJet (http://x.com/@TennesseeJet)

https://bunny-wp-pullzone-cteumfvqig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/455705175_515413044341707_2391784408289333860_n-1-1-jpg-qsngu9741jsq1pqjjsqb5j1rfywrlrqg7ojs89zdl4.avif


Dr. Heather Heying
@HeatherEHeying (http://x.com/@HeatherEHeying)

https://bunny-wp-pullzone-cteumfvqig.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/JD-headshot-full-body-BIG-1-e1724194544631-qswppuj922fkzswes9sg80elenb1zyrm4yimdzsgaw.png (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?120943-What-is-it-with-the-Jimmy-Dore-Show)


Jimmy Dore
@JimmyDoreShow (http://x.com/@JimmyDoreShow)

The "Rescue The Republic" website is: jointheresistance.org (https://jointheresistance.org)

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

1836085088834232437


source (https://twitter.com/JohnKuhles1966/status/1836085088834232437?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXtnGtCXoAAL4Om?format=jpg&name=large (https://twitter.com/JohnKuhles1966/status/1836175013407265023?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)


source (https://twitter.com/JohnKuhles1966/status/1836175013407265023?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

1836075409022108059


source (https://twitter.com/RescueRepublic/status/1836075409022108059?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

[ExomatrixTV]

RFK Jr. podcast with Bret Weinstein:

pY2cML0Tq_M

[ExomatrixTV]

We've Forgotten to Learn from the Past...and It's About to Loop Again :


5EJ9VTSqvoo

Political theater dominates Congress, regardless of party lines.

Current political climate likened to "Groundhog Day" of repetitive posturing.
Uncertainty surrounds U.S. presidency, triggering public skepticism.
Evolution of governmental consciousness and its impact discussed.
Importance of learning from historical documents like the Declaration of Independence emphasized.
Criticism of America's founding fathers' motivations and actions examined.
Comparison drawn between English and American historical grievances against monarchy.
Recognition of the progress made in governance and rights over centuries highlighted.New oaths and liturgy imposed to enforce tyranny faced clergy resistance and violated English laws.
Declaration of Independence underscores rights violated by English kings, emphasizing consent of the governed.
Distinction between royal subjects and citizens crucial; citizens consent to governance, unlike subjects.
American Declaration of Independence marked a historic rejection of tyrannical rule and a shift towards citizen governance.
Concerns over digital tyranny echo historical struggles against unjust authority, emphasizing protection of digital rights.
Critique of current political dynamics as repetitive theater, highlighting bipartisan failures in fiscal responsibility.
Political maneuvers like the SAVE Act criticized as false promises in ongoing political theater, urging preservation of constitutional values.

Key Historical Context
Historical grievances against English kings, highlighting violations of inherent rights such as those expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights.
Legal and Philosophical Foundation
Emphasizes the transition from being royal subjects under monarchical rule to citizens under a government by consent, as stated in the American Declaration of Independence.
Evolution of Political Thought
Describes a shift in consciousness among colonists, from acceptance of monarchical authority to demanding governance based on consent and individual rights.
Contemporary Political Critique
Criticizes current political practices, including legislative inefficiencies and perceived disregard for fiscal responsibility.
Concerns about Digital Era
Warns against potential digital tyranny by corporations, paralleling historical concerns over monarchical abuses.
Call for Upholding Rights
Advocates for ensuring that digital and offline rights align to protect individual freedoms, citing ongoing legislative battles and the role of citizen consent in governance.

Themes of governmental authority, historical rights violations, the evolution of citizen rights from subjects to citizens, and critiques of current political theater and fiscal irresponsibility. It emphasizes the importance of remembering history to prevent potential future tyrannies, both digital and governmental. The speaker urges for consistent application of rights in the digital age, drawing parallels between past monarchies and potential modern corporate control. The transcript highlights skepticism towards current political maneuvers and calls for upholding constitutional principles for enduring popular liberty.

Political Landscape & Historical Insights

Current State of Congress:


Political Theater: Both Democrats and Republicans are criticized for engaging in posturing and fake fighting, described as mere political theater with no substantive progress.
Repetitive Dysfunction: The political process is likened to "Groundhog Day," indicating a cycle of the same ineffective actions regardless of which party holds the Speaker position.
Absence of Clear Leadership: A viral post by Glenn Greenwald raises concerns about the lack of a clear president, suggesting an unprecedented situation where the role of commander-in-chief is ambiguous.
Secret Service Restrictions: The speaker mentions restrictions by the Secret Service preventing him from addressing the crowd, hinting at deeper political or safety issues.
Questioning Competency: Doubts are cast on Joe Biden's fitness to be president, implying that a team is effectively running the country without proper presidential oversight.

Historical Context: American Revolution and British Tyranny

American Declaration of Independence:


Foundational Documents: Emphasizes the significance of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights in shaping modern understandings of rights and liberties.
Misconceptions About Founders: Critiques the oversimplified view of America's founding fathers as merely wealthy merchants opposing taxes, arguing they were more complex figures striving for broader systemic changes.
Evolution of Consciousness: Highlights the importance of understanding historical mindsets to appreciate the revolutionary changes that led to American independence.

Grand Remonstrance of 1641:


Extensive Grievances: Details 204 specific abuses by King Charles I, including:

Dissolving Parliament: Repeated dissolutions leading to an 11-year tyranny from 1629 to 1640.
Taxation Without Consent: Imposition of taxes like ship money without parliamentary approval.
Violation of Rights: Abuses against habeas corpus, trial by jury, and forced loans.
Military Overreach: Establishing a standing army in peacetime and quartering troops unlawfully.
Religious Control: Imposing new oaths and liturgies to maintain tyranny, intertwining church and state.


Contrast with Declaration: Unlike the Grand Remonstrance, the Declaration of Independence directly accuses King George III of tyranny, marking a shift in accountability from ministers to the monarch himself.

Modern-Day Concerns: Digital Tyranny and Government Overreach:


Digital Tyranny: Warns of a new form of tyranny facilitated by digital platforms and corporations, drawing parallels to historical monarchical abuses.
Rights Online and Offline: Stresses the need for inherent rights to be upheld both in digital spaces and the physical world to ensure comprehensive protection of freedoms.
Impact of Social Media: Highlights how actions and statements on social media can have real-world consequences, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding rights in both realms.

Legislative Critique and Budgetary Politics:


Continuing Resolutions (CR): Criticizes the reliance on CRs and omnibus bills, which bypass the standard appropriations process and lead to inefficient budget management.
Spending Increases:

Democrats: Accused of wanting to expand the welfare state, leading to increased spending.
Republicans: Criticized for seeking to grow the military-industrial complex, also resulting in higher expenditures.


Funding of Agencies: Despite exposing abuses within agencies like the CDC, FDA, ATF, DOJ, FBI, NSA, USDA, and NSF, continued funding is seen as complicit in maintaining their power.
The "Save Act":

Political Maneuvering: Described as a false promise to address electoral issues like illegal voting, ultimately unlikely to pass and serving as mere political theater.
Public Deception: Seen as a strategy to placate constituents without implementing meaningful change.



Conclusion:


Importance of Historical Awareness: Emphasizes that understanding historical struggles for rights is crucial to preventing the repetition of past abuses.
Upholding Foundational Principles: Calls for the preservation and extension of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence both online and offline to maintain popular liberty.
Vigilance Against Tyranny: Alerts to the potential rise of new forms of tyranny, urging continuous defense of inherent rights and freedoms.



Political Dysfunction: Current Congress is seen as ineffective, engageing in repetitive and unproductive political maneuvers.
Historical Lessons: Understanding the depth and context of historical documents like the Declaration of Independence and the Grand Remonstrance is essential for contemporary political awareness.
Modern Threats: Digital platforms pose new challenges to maintaining freedoms, paralleling historical threats posed by monarchical abuses.
Legislative Failures: Ongoing budgetary practices undermine effective governance and perpetuate agency overreach.
Call to Action: Advocates for a return to foundational principles and heightened vigilance to safeguard democracy and personal freedoms.

Important Figures Mentioned:


Glenn Greenwald: Journalist referenced for his viral post questioning the current state of presidential leadership.
Joe Biden: Current President criticized for perceived incompetency and reliance on a controlling team.
King Charles I: Historical monarch whose abuses are detailed as a precedent for the American Revolution.
King George III: Directly accused of tyranny in the Declaration of Independence, marking a pivotal shift in accountability.

Critical Documents Referenced:


American Declaration of Independence: Fundamental document declaring the colonies' separation from British rule.
Grand Remonstrance (1641): Extensive list of grievances against King Charles I leading up to the English Civil War.
Magna Carta (1215): Early document establishing certain legal protections against royal authority.
Petition of Right (1628): Document challenging King Charles I's abuses, reinforcing rights like habeas corpus and trial by jury.

Agencies and Institutions Criticized:


CDC, FDA, ATF, DOJ, FBI, NSA, USDA, NSF: Various government agencies criticized for overreach and unconstitutional actions.
Congressional Bureaucrats: Accused of maintaining a totalitarian state by perpetuating agency powers without sufficient oversight.

Future Implications:


Digital and Physical Rights Alignment: Necessitates ensuring that online rights are as protected as offline ones to prevent emerging forms of tyranny.
Historical Vigilance: Encourages continuous education and remembrance of historical abuses to inform and protect current democratic structures.
Legislative Responsibility: Urges Congress to adopt more transparent and effective budgeting practices to avoid perpetual political crises.

Final Thoughts:

The analysis underscores the importance of historical awareness in understanding and addressing contemporary political challenges. By drawing parallels between past and present abuses of power, it advocates for a vigilant and informed citizenry dedicated to preserving foundational democratic principles.

References:


American Declaration of Independence (https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript) (1776)
Grand Remonstrance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Remonstrance)(1641)
Magna Carta (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta) (1215)
Petition of Right (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petition_of_Right) (1628)

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳


1826582261640081624

[ExomatrixTV]

Mikki Willis New Documentary, "Rescue The Republic" Will Pull Back The Curtain On The Deep State...:

GoY-2jlbxr8
Mikki Willis New Powerful Documentary, "Rescue The Republic" Will Pull Back The Curtain And Destroy The Deep State...

"Nearly every war we have fought was initiated by their propaganda. As their Empire of Lies is collapsing they are becoming increasingly desperate and dangerous"


facebook.com/zeroctyption (https://www.facebook.com/zeroctyption)
x.com/Neolibrium (https://x.com/Neolibrium)
twitch.tv/zerocryption (https://www.twitch.tv/zerocryption)
twitch.tv/Neolibrium (https://www.twitch.tv/Neolibrium)

[Bill Ryan]

Copying this post by norman on the Dr. Lee Merritt thread. (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?124070-Dr.-Lee-Merritt-All-things-Merritt-The-Medical-Rebel&p=1652134&viewfull=1#post1652134) :thumbsup:

~~~

The Medical Rebel - LtCol. USAF (Ret) Sandy Miarecke Restoring the Republic. God is Calling his Army

I've heard several people talk about the same general issue of the takeover of the republic. Sandy Miarecki does it very well and Lee Merritt with her talented snout didn't miss the opportunity to give here a big platform to do it.

https://rumble.com/v6avw4d-ltcol.-usaf-ret-sandy-mariecke-restoring-the-republic.-god-is-calling-his-a.html
v68nh3j