Grooming Gang scandal, UK

[Eric J (Viking)]

Looks like things are hotting up folks …

FEROCIOUS ROW Erupts On Live TV As Tice Slams Sky News For Not Reporting On Grooming Gang Scandal!

Short video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPlnU9jWOOE

[jaybee]

*
*

This GB News video features an interview with Lily Moo... an Iranian Human Rights Campaigner - she grew up in the West Midlands and experienced the situation first hand - explaining where the root of the problem lies as she understands it....interviewer Martin Daubney is emotionally overcome briefly at the end of the interview then gets himself together for the next part....

The next bit with Chris Hope GB News Political Editor... goes on to discuss, among other things that Reform UK is threatening to conduct their own enquiry if the Government won't -

re the title of the video.... I'm not sure about the claim being 'astonishing' .... it's fairly generally understood to be where the problem lies... it's just that no one wants to tackle it... (well, no one in the Uni~Party - aka Lab, Con or Lib Dem)

Grooming Gangs: Martin Daubney Driven To Tears Live On Air As Guest Makes ASTONISHING Muslim Claim(13:57)

lssocHRbiNE

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Important article from (cough) the Daily Telegraph, of all papers. Reporter Allison Pearson pulls no punches, and it's about bloody time. The article's behind what looks like a paywall, but I managed to rip it. Posted in full below.

1876908963310276989


Elon Musk has ripped the cloak of deceit off one of Britain’s most disgusting scandals

Starmer’s denunciation of Musk for ‘spreading lies and misinformation’ about Muslim child-rape gangs is an orchestra of discordant duplicity

07 January 2025 9:01pm GMT
54258

Once upon a time there was a good and fair country and people who lived in countries that were neither good nor fair travelled to that land and made it their home because they knew it to be kind. But some men who made that land their home brought the values of countries that were neither kind nor fair with them. Such men hated the female children they found in the good and fair country. The girls were white but not chaste; they were dirty unbelievers who went about unaccompanied as if they were boys. They disgusted the men, and they tempted them, which made them hate the female children even more. The monsters, for that is what the men became over time, caused savage harm to thousands of girls – so many that no one is yet sure of the number and may never be, for some were lost or killed. And the monsters drugged and bribed them, they made them sex slaves, branding the girls’ flesh with their initials, ramming large implements into their tiny bodies the better to accommodate four men.

This may be hard to comprehend, dear reader, but the people of that enlightened land did not protect their daughters. I’m sorry to say they abandoned them to their fate. Police, whose duty it was to look after the most vulnerable, either arrested the girls, dismissed their pleas for help or left them with their tormentors. For that famously kind and decent land had fallen under a strange enchantment, which was called multiculturalism. It said that, no matter how wicked or cruel the men were to the children, you must never speak of it. The dark spell, and what a powerful spell it was (enough to vanquish justice and compassion), caused any who dared to say that Pakistani Muslim men were targeting white girls to become the bad people. Because all cultures are equal, you see, even ones that don’t believe in equality or which agree that girls who aren’t virgins are whores and deserve to be punished.

And those who struggled against the powerful spell that stifled their countrymen were called racist. And to be racist or bigoted or “far-Right” was to be far more hateful than any hatred inflicted on female children, or so the people of the good and fair country were told by their leaders.

And when the monsters swore at the children whom they were raping, saying, “White slag!” “White c—!” – well, that wasn’t at all racist. Because multiculturalism and the BBC say it cannot be so.

A few brave women (Julie, Ann, Maggie, Sarah) who woke from the enchantment and warned young girls were in danger from British Pakistani men were banished and forced to apologise for being “reckless in my choice of words”. Or they lost their seat in the shadow Cabinet.

And the evil – a vast, suppurating evil such as the land had not known for a thousand years – continued to blight that good and fair country. The authorities colluded to make sure the hatred must never speak its name, and the girls carried their lonely torment within them and their rapists got access to the babies they had impregnated them with. (Oh, yes, they did. So strong was the multicultural enchantment it made people surrender the values they had been born to.)

And the monsters were not banished from the good and fair country, not one of them sent back to countries that were neither good nor fair, in case their human rights were breached.

Then, one day, the richest man in the whole wide world came along and broke the dark spell. Elon had read court transcripts telling what those monsters had done to the female children, and he could not believe such unfathomable depravity had taken root in the good and fair country. Because of his great wealth, Elon could not be intimidated into agreeing that thousands of white girls should have been used as a peace offering to placate the gods of multiculturalism. His righteous wrath shamed the cowardly leaders of the land and in their panic they cried “Misinformation!” But the people were having none of it. For they were awake now and they saw what horrors the brutes had been allowed to get away with. As the wicked enchantment lifted, the malevolent myth of multiculturalism was unmasked, the country slowly but surely recovered its senses and demanded the guilty be found and punished, even unto the highest in the land.

As this is a fairytale, I guess it would be nice to say that they all lived happily ever after. Yet, even after it was agreed all the monsters would be deported to great national rejoicing, there was a terrible stain on the good and fair country’s history that would never quite be expunged. It stood shamed before the civilized world. And in the national memory, lodged forever it seemed, were the anguished, tortured, frightened cries of those who were allowed to suffer and die to avoid stirring up racial hatred.

The girls. The girls. The girls.

‘Shame and devastating sadness’

Sir Keir Starmer has no idea what he’s up against. Not this time. Since he entered Downing Street six intolerable months ago, the Prime Minister’s ability to strike exactly the wrong note on any given occasion has never failed him, but his denunciation of Elon Musk for “spreading lies and misinformation” about Pakistani-heritage Muslim child-rape gangs is a whole orchestra of discordant deceit. Many Britons feel deeply grateful that the billionaire owner of X (formerly Twitter) was moved to intervene in this disgusting scandal, I suspect, and Musk has certainly provoked more soul-searching in 10 days than Westminster managed in 10 years. The Prime Minister’s imputation that those who want a full-throated national inquiry into the evil gangs, and the cowardly state apparatchiks who covered them up, were simply seeking to “jump on a bandwagon of the far-Right” is obscene. Apparently, thousands of survivors who endured mass rape as children (20 men awaiting their turn downstairs, one woman recalled) are far-Right for wanting answers and accountability. Is it far-Right, Prime Minister, to object that your primary torturer was released early after a derisory sentence and now lurks menacingly outside your home?

That’s what has happened to Liz, who still lives in Rotherham. Liz tells me she wants a “collective inquiry to show the depth of what’s happened and to go after those who failed us”. Like other victims of Pakistani rape gangs, Liz is disgusted with the strange, soulless man who had the chance at his Monday press conference to speak for the whole nation. He could have expressed the shame and devastating sadness we feel that such bestial crimes should have been committed here, and for so long. Instead, Sir Keir spoke out of narrow party self-interest, only sounding vaguely passionate when addressing what really troubles him: Islamophobia.

Exactly as he did back in July after the massacre of children in Southport. Berated by a crowd of locals whom he refused to speak to after hastily laying a wreath, Starmer couldn’t wait to dash to a mosque where he vowed to “take every step possible” to keep the Muslim community safe. That meant creating a new violent disorder unit to deal with all the “far-Right thugs” who, for some reason, objected to three little girls at a Taylor Swift dance class being slaughtered. Can’t think why.

People on social media who, in the heat of the moment, posted deeply unsavoury, inflammatory reactions or retweeted “conspiracy theories” were arrested and jailed with an alacrity and force that was entirely absent when it came to catching the foul fiends who committed some of the most despicable crimes imaginable. (One police officer explained to a distraught father that his daughter being raped might actually “teach her a lesson”.)

In both cases, we see the same sly, leftie-liberal playbook. Minimise the rape/killing/trafficking of young girls. Call it “grooming” and not what it is: raping children. Refuse to disclose the ethnic identity of the perpetrators to prevent “racism”. Accuse anyone who mentions the religion or ethnicity of the perpetrators of bigotry and “dog-whistle” politics. Under pressure, admit that the perpetrators are “Asians” (to the understandable anger of Sikhs, Hindus and Christians). Deflect attention from the sheer stomach-churning horror of the crimes and the wild, unappeasable sorrow of the victims and switch the focus to the “inappropriate” language or “harmful rhetoric” of people who are prepared to call out the most depraved assaults and most shocking cover-up in British history.

Sir Keir genuinely seems more outraged about Elon Musk calling safeguarding minister Jess Phillips a “genocidal rape apologist” for her refusal to authorise a national inquiry into the Oldham scandal (she insists the council can have its own inquiry) than he is about the 12-year-old who was driven at night to a Yorkshire wood where she was forced to give oral sex to at least 10 men (more cars kept arriving as word spread) before being left alone in the dark.

If a prime minister can’t empathise, just for a few seconds, with the terror that child experienced then he shouldn’t be leading the country. But Starmer was clearly far more at ease saying he was “very shocked and angered” at the killing of George Floyd, a black American for whom he fell to one knee. As I have learnt since Essex police called on me over an alleged hate crime, British institutions, from Parliament to the police, are obsessed with “protected characteristics” enshrined in the Equality Act. In 2013, if you were a white working-class kid in care in Keighley, who was passed around from uncle to cousin to nephew, forget it. No characteristics worth protecting, love. In fact, in the unlikely event that poor child had ever plucked up courage to go to the council or the police, her complaint would have been viewed as unhelpful to the greater goal of anti-racism and diversity. Had the ethnic profiles been reversed – the child was black or Muslim and the bastards who pimped her out white – you can bet we would never have heard the end of it. The British Establishment had something in common with the rapists: they saw the girls as white trash.

Viewing everything through the prism of race is a disease of the elite liberal and bureaucratic class, not just here but throughout a self-loathing Western world which sees merit in every culture but its own. In a response on X to Musk and the rape-gangs scandal, the historian and Times columnist Sathnam Sanghera posted: “Of course, the vivid fear of ‘innocent white women’ being violated by brown men was one of the great drivers of British imperial racism.” Does Sanghera actually think thousands of brutalised white girls in up to 50 British towns and villages from Rochdale to Oxford made up their ordeals in order to cast racist aspersions on innocent brown men? He quickly deleted his tweet after it caused outrage, so maybe it was just fashionable posturing, but revealing for all that. Holding the opinion that non-white people are somehow always victims is a sign of social superiority, marking one out from ghastly fascist proles like Tommy Robinson. Whatever Robinson’s manifold flaws, he inspires huge loyalty among his supporters because he has fought like a lion for girls from his social class. Girls who former Labour home secretary Jack Straw admitted were regarded as “easy meat” by some of his Pakistani constituents.

Thanks to all the big-hearted, bien-pensant apologists for child rapists – including Labour politicians increasingly dependent on the Muslim vote–- our international reputation is in the gutter. In the US, The Free Press ran a major article this week headlined: “The Biggest Peacetime Crime – and Cover-up – in British History”. How did our society sink to these depths of depravity? It is clear that every tier of the system is implicated in the whitewash.

Lucy Allan, who was the Conservative MP for Telford from 2015-2024, explained to me how even those who do try to fight for the victims are thwarted and obstructed. After she’d met survivors in her Shropshire town, Allan started speaking out in Parliament. The pushback was intense. “There was a co-ordinated official response by people in positions of power. Shaun Davies, Telford Council Leader (now the town’s Labour MP), immediately published a letter to the Home Secretary stating that no inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) was necessary. He backed up his assertion with claims that we now know were false. Multiple senior men were asked to be co-signatories to his claims and they all readily agreed.” Instead of trying to right heinous wrongs, Telford councillors set about discrediting the messengers. Lucy Allan was accused of “lying, causing division, racism, being unbalanced, irrational, stupid and motivated not by a desire to help victims but to score political points. This narrative was relentlessly pushed for as long as I campaigned on the issue. It had the intended effect of ensuring that the voice I sought to be for victims would not be heard.”

54259
Lucy Allan, the former Conservative MP for Telford, was accused of ‘lying, racism and trying to score political points’ Credit: Andrew Fox

Most extraordinary was an unexpected visit the MP received from Anthony Bangham, then the Chief Constable of West Mercia, and John Campion, the Police and Crime Commissioner. “The Chief Constable was disparaging about Rotherham MP Sarah Champion, suggesting she was exaggerating the grooming gangs issue and was discredited,” Lucy recalls. “He said: ‘You wouldn’t want to be known as a troublemaker like Sarah Champion. It will harm your reputation and career.’” Since when is it the role of a chief constable to warn a democratically-elected MP not to campaign for her traumatised constituents?

Even Allan’s Conservative colleagues could be disapproving. “The newly-minted Junior Minister for Safeguarding, Vicky Atkins, told me not to speak to the media on the subject as ‘you do not understand the issues’. I was summoned by Conservative Peer Baroness Warsi to explain myself.”

Lucy Allan came up against the oft-repeated refrain that, as 90 per cent of child abuse is committed by white men in domestic settings, why didn’t she concern herself with that as it was a more significant problem? She saw this as “a blatant denial of the existence of groups of inter-related men of Pakistani heritage preying on young girls at school gates, in takeaways, taxis and playgrounds. They did not want to know.”

Victims were often blamed, she says, with one young girl being described by police as “‘having been in contact with 53 different Asian males’ as if it were by choice! There was complete denial that these men were related to each other through cousin marriage and were engaged in a joint enterprise.”

Now that she has lost her seat, Allan is free to deliver a brutally honest verdict. “The people in power believed that being honest about what had happened to the girls would fuel racial tensions. They pushed a narrative that hiding the problem was in the interests of the community, that looking the other way would cement social cohesion and protect society.” That line, Lucy now knows for a fact, was pushed by Home Office officials. She has watched as junior ministers, both Conservative and Labour, have spun the same lines, “almost word for word, clearly at the behest of civil servants”.

That “denial strategy” may once have been well-intentioned (a noble lie), but those who enforced it – from the House of Commons to the police stations to the BBC – became the enemies of justice, the willing accomplices of the Devil. The social contract between the state and the individual is in tatters. They lied to us, and the public knows they lied.
What now? The Government tells us there is no need for another national inquiry, instead they will implement the recommendations of the 2022 Jay report on child sexual abuse (CSA). But CSA is not the same as Group Localised Child Sexual Exploitation (GLCSE), which describes the horrendous and co-ordinated abuse by primarily Pakistani-heritage Muslim rape gangs in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale and Oxford, places the 2022 inquiry didn’t even take into account. This is not about mainly white paedophiles, bad though they are. And it certainly can’t be left, as Jess Phillips suggests, to councils like Oldham to investigate themselves when many councillors are drawn from the same intensely tribal community as the offenders.

‘The failed model of multiculturalism must be opened up to scrutiny’

We must do what the girls want. They went unheard for so long. And if they want a national inquiry into the British Pakistani child-rape gangs – call them what they are, no obfuscation, no denial, no soothing words – then they must have it. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has rightly said that she will try to insert a clause pledging such an inquiry into the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill on Wednesday – let’s see which MP is foolish enough not to support it. The failed model of multiculturalism must be opened up to scrutiny and a furious public will be entitled to hear why, if it was such a brilliant idea, it could only be maintained via orchestrated deception by the media, the police and most of the political class. All of the rapists who hold dual nationality must be deported. Millions of us would vote for that, wouldn’t we?

Thanks to Elon Musk the multiculturalism cloak of denial and deceit has been ripped off and the left are suddenly revealed to have no clothes. On the Today programme yesterday, Nick Robinson tried to demolish Robert Jenrick with talk of harmful “rhetoric” and accusations that Jenrick was seeking to limit immigration to the UK from what he called “alien cultures”. So what? Insulting and betraying the interests of the white majority doesn’t work any more, Nick. The shadow justice secretary stood his ground. In his calm, unrattled confidence, you detected that he knew now that he was talking for Britain and would not be afraid to do so. “We have seen millions of people enter the UK in recent years and some of them have backward, frankly medieval attitudes to women”.

You know, as the debate over Musk’s “interference” rages and Labour sees the edifice of diversity politics crashing around their ears, and Starmer looks more inhuman by the day, it’s easy to forget what this is about. Why it matters so very much. Over the weekend, I made myself read the sentencing remarks of His Honour Judge Peter Rook after the trial of Akhtar Dogar, Anjum Dogar, Kamar Jamil, Mohammed Karrar and Basam Karrar. My God. In paragraph after paragraph, the judge outlines what those Pakistani-heritage brutes did to their victims. Less like sexual abuse than the kind of atrocities you encounter only in wartime. “Years of sheer torture .. great brutality.. robbed of their adolescence… torment and distress.. apart from using her for your own sexual gratification you coerced her into providing sex to vast numbers of strangers. Up to four or five men would be invited to addresses so they could have sex with her. Customers would become angry. Strangers would burn her with cigarettes. Slapped. She said the men had a ‘pack mentality’.

Grabbing her by the ponytail and forcing her head down onto his penis. Drink and drugs to make them more malleable. One inserted a hairbrush into her vagina. She suffers from self-loathing. Nightmares, panic attacks, flashbacks, PTSD. Despite being the victim she carries with her a great burden of shame and embarrassment… one of vaginal rape, one of oral rape, one of arranging child prostitution, wilful blindness by the authorities, wicked plan to punish her for lying that she had her period, one of vaginal rape, one of oral rape, rape, rape, rape.”

It’s not bearable to read about as an adult, so imagine what it must have felt like to live through it if you were 13 years old. My heart broke when I came to this part: “Her mother describes how by the time you had finished with her there was not much left of her apart from her aggression. You took her soul. She felt as though it had been ripped out.”

We are so sorry that happened to you, sweet girl, whoever you are. And we will not rest until those responsible are brought to account. Until you have compensation. We will not allow men who hate white women and girls, who think we are lower than cattle, to breathe the same air as us. We owe you that much.

[AngelArmy]

To think that our own governments have knowingly done this to us. My heart is genuinely broken for my homeland :(

[Eric J (Viking)]

I see Musk has stated Starmer will be gone soon…

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1876486484070731878
1876486484070731878

[norman]

I see Musk has stated Starmer will be gone soon…

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1876486484070731878
1876486484070731878

When Starmer is gone, what next ?

On paper, KC can close parliament and rule the country directly.

If he gives Diego Garcia to China, is China going to keep all it's wheels on long enough for that to worry Trump ?

Right now it looks like the CCP is busy trying to get a cull of China's own people going, to save it's own ass from a people's revolution 2.0.

[Mari]

Whilst listening to Talk Radio this morning, someone had phoned in to state exactly what I am starting to feel about this case, and indeed other things that the man Starmer has put into place.
That this is going to be used to foment a civil war in the UK. When you see it like that, it becomes absolutely clear why Starmer is not doing a damn thing about this scandal, why he's ignored the real reason for Southport, why he's ignoring the immigration catastrophe, why he's ignoring our Farmers, why he's stripping the pensioners of their comforts, why he's being deliberately (oh yes!) in his use of the 'far-right' and 'thugs' label to describe normal, humane outrage. And on and on it will go.

This soul-less excuse for humanity is a cabal Tool - bought in specifically to foment the conditions for a civil unrest here. The reason i feel is so that the WEF can jump in amongst the resulting wreckage to 'save' the UK, handily using the young males of fighting age (shipped over, via a rubber dingy) who are currently being housed in our hotels and being primed for their 'role' in controlling the Infidel population when they rise up. Of course, 'saving' in this case means a total reset in every way you can imagine and we all know what that will look like.

[Bill Ryan]

Start in at 31:35 on Chris Martenson's new weekly analysis video, 'The Signal Hour'.

Martenson predicts this will bring down the Starmer government.

https://avalonlibrary.net/Bill/Daily_Mirror_front_page_Horrific_Betrayal_of_1400_Children.jpg



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ-uclJ8YDg

[Rizotto]

This is the result of the globalist cabal's agenda to use massive immigration to destabilize the west and eventually destroy western civilization, which is one of their steps towards major world depopulation.

I'm not excusing these pakistani rapists for one moment, but the focus on muslim sexual abuse of women is concerning. In reality pervasive male sexual harassment isn't observed only in muslim societies. I recall clearly reports 40 years ago from young women from Canada/USA/Europe travelling in staunchly catholic Latin American countries and being subjected to constant sexual harassment. It didn't matter how they dressed or minded their own business, they were a constant target of groping and hissing (literally). Some decided to cut their travel short for that reason.

The catholic religion does not instruct boys to behave that way towards women. I know, I was brought up as a catholic, but even in Canada in the catholic community in general we could observe that women were overall subjected to the control of family and men. And if women dared to step outside those 'norms' they were subjected to harassment and disrepute. I've seen this in action myself decades ago, although this sort of culture has drastically changed in more recent decades.

As for these nightmarish criminals raping girls in the UK, it was entirely predictable that immigrants from a 'male domination' culture would behave that way... Let's hope they all get prosecuted, punished and deported. As well as the government officials who made this happen.

[Mike Gorman]

AngelArmy, you have nailed it...I think legions of expatriates are in mourning for their homeland, in addition to the poor bastards incumbent, this multicultural imposition has clobbered Britain, for it is an imposition not a universally agreed direction - it looks to me that the entire EU/UK and 5-eyes communities are in turmoil and agony. We might point to individuals and claim they are culpable, but in the end it is the apathy and inability of people to unite and cooperate that has led to this outcome. Humanity is being taught some very hard lessons at the minute, and then of course we have WWIII/IV (or however you choose to calculate the wars) in progress: the Earth is a hot mess currently!

[Tintin]

Reposting this from the Turmoil in the British Isles thread (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?119339-Turmoil-in-the-British-Isles&p=1649719&viewfull=1#post1649719) from January 4th - this may have been missed by a great many now taking an interest:

---


The X-sphere is abuzz with the appalling grooming gang disaster revelations, again, ongoing for many decades now, and a lot of predictable too-ing, and fro-ing as one has come to expect with these sorts of disgusting practices with, on one side, accusations of 'racism' being hurled by the usual suspects, and firmer commentary on the other, highly justified in my view, that, fair punishment should be meted out to ALL those complicit in the allowing of this.

This is a historical piece from 2012 where our incumbent Prime Minister is slurring and waffling his mendacious way through something that's trying to be an answer to a straightforward question.

Text from Robin Monotti (https://x.com/i/status/1875191431146717536):


Did Keir Starmer cover up the mass systematic rape of English white working class girls? Judge for yourself. Here he is trying to answer questions as Chief Prosecutor and head of the Crown Prosecution Service in 2012:

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1875191305388670976/pu/vid/avc1/1280x718/pFF_3cys1yXIxKnw.mp4?tag=12

---

This, from Katie Hopkins:

Text:


Great to see so many people boldly speaking out about majority Pakistani grooming gangs. Now. In 2025.

Images from 2015.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgURKpxWEAEet2S?format=jpg&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgURKpxWkAAsMP9?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgURKp0WMAAn1yC?format=jpg&name=large

---

This, from 2021 courtesy of MP Robbie Moore (https://x.com/_RobbieMoore/status/1875207944230608959):

Text:


In 2021, I called a debate in Parliament exposing the rape gang scandal and launching my campaign for a full inquiry.

Just one of Keir Starmer’s MP’s decided to turn up and listen.

https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1875207865708744704/vid/avc1/720x720/qFKbnMWwGzLnhlm8.mp4?tag=16

---

A historical Sun Newspaper headline although I'm struggling to see the publishing date?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgU75sLbcAAQqCC?format=jpg&name=900x900

---

A historical Tweet:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgU75sIbgAAhM91?format=jpg&name=large

---


It may well be a scandal such as this that will see him, Keir Starmer, dethroned - Tintin Quarantino comment, Jan 4th, 2025

---

And this (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?119339-Turmoil-in-the-British-Isles&p=1649721&viewfull=1#post1649721) must-see documentary made by Charlie Peters from GB News, in 2023.


Grooming gangs, continued, with this Charlie Peters GB News expose made last year, and in our library (https://avalonlibrary.net/UK_Grooming_gangs/Grooming_Gangs_Britain%27s_Shame_%28GB_News_2023%29.mp4):

Grooming Gangs - Britain's shame

https://avalonlibrary.net/UK_Grooming_gangs/Grooming_Gangs_Britain%27s_Shame_%28GB_News_2023%29.mp4

LINK: https://avalonlibrary.net/UK_Grooming_gangs/Grooming_Gangs_Britain%27s_Shame_%28GB_News_2023%29.mp4

---

With thanks as well to Mark/Star Mariner for the Telegraph article which is usually hidden behind their paywall, although for today at least, has been 'opened (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/01/07/elon-musk-has-ripped-cloak-of-deceit-off-britain-scandal/)' for all. It's also saved as a PDF in the Avalon Library, here (https://avalonlibrary.net/UK_Grooming_gangs/2025-01-07_Elon_Musk_has_ripped_the_cloak_of_deceit_off_Britain%92s_grooming_gangs_scandal_by_Allison_Pearso n_%28The_Telegraph%29.pdf), and downloadable, as ever.

[Tintin]

Shared by Samantha Smith via X (https://x.com/SamanthaTaghoy/status/1877077466101014543), herself a recovering victim of this abuse:



These are the names of the 111 MPs who voted in favour of forcing a government inquiry into child sexual exploitation and Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs.

Thank you.
You are on the right side of history.


Jim Allister (Traditional Unionist Voice)
Lee Anderson (Reform UK)
Stuart Anderson (Conservative)
Edward Argar (Conservative)
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Gareth Bacon (Conservative)
Kemi Badenoch (Conservative)
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Steve Barclay (Conservative)
Peter Bedford (Conservative)
Saqib Bhatti (Conservative)
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Sarah Bool (Conservative)
Aphra Brandreth (Conservative)
Alex Burghart (Conservative)
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Conservative)
Lewis Cocking (Conservative)
John Cooper (Conservative)
Alberto Costa (Conservative)
Claire Coutinho (Conservative)
Harriet Cross (Conservative)
Gareth Davies (Conservative)
Mims Davies (Conservative)
David Davis (Conservative)
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Alex Easton (Independent)
Luke Evans (Conservative)
Nigel Farage (Reform UK)
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Ashley Fox (Conservative)
Mark Francois (Conservative)
George Freeman (Conservative)
Louie French (Conservative)
Roger Gale (Conservative)
John Glen (Conservative)
Helen Grant (Conservative)
Andrew Griffith (Conservative)
Rebecca Harris (Conservative)
John Hayes (Conservative)
Damian Hinds (Conservative)
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Nigel Huddleston (Conservative)
Neil Hudson (Conservative)
Jeremy Hunt (Conservative)
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Caroline Johnson (Conservative)
Lincoln Jopp (Conservative)
Alicia Kearns (Conservative)
Danny Kruger (Conservative)
Katie Lam (Conservative)
John Lamont (Conservative)
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Rupert Lowe (Reform UK)
Alan Mak (Conservative)
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Jerome Mayhew (Conservative)
James McMurdock (Reform UK)
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Andrew Mitchell (Conservative)
Gagan Mohindra (Conservative)
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Joy Morrissey (Conservative)
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
David Mundell (Conservative)
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Neil O'Brien (Conservative)
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Priti Patel (Conservative)
Rebecca Paul (Conservative)
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Jack Rankin (Conservative)
David Reed (Conservative)
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative)
Alec Shelbrooke (Conservative)
David Simmonds (Conservative)
Greg Smith (Conservative)
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Julian Smith (Conservative)
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Patrick Spencer (Conservative)
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Blake Stephenson (Conservative)
Mel Stride (Conservative)
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Robin Swann (Ulster Unionist Party)
Bradley Thomas (Conservative)
Richard Tice (Reform UK)
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Laura Trott (Conservative)
Tom Tugendhat (Conservative)
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Matt Vickers (Conservative)
Helen Whately (Conservative)
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Gavin Williamson (Conservative)
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Mike Wood (Conservative)

[Tintin]

The House of Commons vote against opening up an inquiry: Noes 364 v Ayes 111 January 8th at around 9PM

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1877075003579006976/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/CoYT3tHtOB8a7Qqg.mp4?tag=12

[Tintin]

Important article from (cough) the Daily Telegraph, of all papers. Reporter Allison Pearson pulls no punches, and it's about bloody time. The article's behind what looks like a paywall, but I managed to rip it.


[from the article - TQ sub-ed | requoted]:Over the weekend, I made myself read the sentencing remarks of His Honour Judge Peter Rook after the trial of Akhtar Dogar, Anjum Dogar, Kamar Jamil, Mohammed Karrar and Basam Karrar. My God. In paragraph after paragraph, the judge outlines what those Pakistani-heritage brutes did to their victims. Less like sexual abuse than the kind of atrocities you encounter only in wartime. “Years of sheer torture .. great brutality.. robbed of their adolescence… torment and distress.. apart from using her for your own sexual gratification you coerced her into providing sex to vast numbers of strangers. Up to four or five men would be invited to addresses so they could have sex with her. Customers would become angry. Strangers would burn her with cigarettes. Slapped. She said the men had a ‘pack mentality’.


Again, many thanks for sharing this here and grabbing the text although by the time you've read this you will see that I've managed to grab the article direct and turned it into a PDF which is now in the library.

Concerning Dogar, Karrar et al: the documents to which Allison refers were also previously saved to the library last week and can be viewed here:

The original sentencing: sentencing-remarks-r-v-dogar-others-june-2013

LINK: https://avalonlibrary.net/UK_Grooming_gangs/sentencing-remarks-r-v-dogar-others-june-2013.pdf
- the gory details clear to see in this 16 page summing up.

The appeal: Karrar & Ors v R. [2015] EWCA Crim 850 (19 May 2015) - the judge threw out the appeal and upheld Judge Rook's findings:
LINK: https://avalonlibrary.net/UK_Grooming_gangs/Karrar%20%26%20Ors%20v%20R.%20%5B2015%5D%20EWCA%20Crim%20850%20%2819%20May%202015%29.pdf

[Bill Ryan]

The House of Commons vote against opening up an inquiry: Noes 364 v Ayes 111 January 8th at around 9PMIs that a kind of 'double negative', meaning that they have voted TO open the inquiry?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Shared by Samantha Smith via X (https://x.com/SamanthaTaghoy/status/1877077466101014543), herself a recovering victim of this abuse:



These are the names of the 111 MPs who voted in favour of forcing a government inquiry into child sexual exploitation and Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs.

Thank you.
You are on the right side of history.


Jim Allister (Traditional Unionist Voice)
Lee Anderson (Reform UK)
Stuart Anderson (Conservative)
Edward Argar (Conservative)
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Gareth Bacon (Conservative)
Kemi Badenoch (Conservative)
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Steve Barclay (Conservative)
Peter Bedford (Conservative)
Saqib Bhatti (Conservative)
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Sarah Bool (Conservative)
Aphra Brandreth (Conservative)
Alex Burghart (Conservative)
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Conservative)
Lewis Cocking (Conservative)
John Cooper (Conservative)
Alberto Costa (Conservative)
Claire Coutinho (Conservative)
Harriet Cross (Conservative)
Gareth Davies (Conservative)
Mims Davies (Conservative)
David Davis (Conservative)
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Alex Easton (Independent)
Luke Evans (Conservative)
Nigel Farage (Reform UK)
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Ashley Fox (Conservative)
Mark Francois (Conservative)
George Freeman (Conservative)
Louie French (Conservative)
Roger Gale (Conservative)
John Glen (Conservative)
Helen Grant (Conservative)
Andrew Griffith (Conservative)
Rebecca Harris (Conservative)
John Hayes (Conservative)
Damian Hinds (Conservative)
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Nigel Huddleston (Conservative)
Neil Hudson (Conservative)
Jeremy Hunt (Conservative)
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Caroline Johnson (Conservative)
Lincoln Jopp (Conservative)
Alicia Kearns (Conservative)
Danny Kruger (Conservative)
Katie Lam (Conservative)
John Lamont (Conservative)
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Rupert Lowe (Reform UK)
Alan Mak (Conservative)
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Jerome Mayhew (Conservative)
James McMurdock (Reform UK)
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Andrew Mitchell (Conservative)
Gagan Mohindra (Conservative)
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Joy Morrissey (Conservative)
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
David Mundell (Conservative)
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Neil O'Brien (Conservative)
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Priti Patel (Conservative)
Rebecca Paul (Conservative)
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Jack Rankin (Conservative)
David Reed (Conservative)
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative)
Alec Shelbrooke (Conservative)
David Simmonds (Conservative)
Greg Smith (Conservative)
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Julian Smith (Conservative)
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Patrick Spencer (Conservative)
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Blake Stephenson (Conservative)
Mel Stride (Conservative)
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Robin Swann (Ulster Unionist Party)
Bradley Thomas (Conservative)
Richard Tice (Reform UK)
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Laura Trott (Conservative)
Tom Tugendhat (Conservative)
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Matt Vickers (Conservative)
Helen Whately (Conservative)
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Gavin Williamson (Conservative)
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Mike Wood (Conservative)

Not a single Labour MP voted for it, no LibDems, and no Greens. But that doesn't exonerate the Conservatives, so much of this went down on their watch.

I believe them all to be equally weak, wicked, gutless, treacherous, false, hypocritical, deceitful, corrupt, reprobate, recreant, warped, and evil.

A disgrace to the people, the Crown, the country. Unfit to serve, the men, the women -- all of them.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

The House of Commons vote against opening up an inquiry: Noes 364 v Ayes 111 January 8th at around 9PMIs that a kind of 'double negative', meaning that they have voted TO open the inquiry?

It's a vote against opening an enquiry.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ggy-5tgWUAEJ1_g?format=jpg&name=900x900

[Tintin]

The House of Commons vote against opening up an inquiry: Noes 364 v Ayes 111 January 8th at around 9PMIs that a kind of 'double negative', meaning that they have voted TO open the inquiry?

No, and perhaps I mis-worded it. The motion was to open an inquiry and it was voted against:

Noes (no to an inquiry) = 364
Ayes (yes to an inquiry) = 111

[Did You See Them]

As Bill points out it should have been 'voted against" - not "vote" !

I see having whipped up his cronies he "abstained" as a no show !
Creep.

[avid]

After watching yesterday’s UK Column News https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-8th-january-2025
I realised this is a vast scenario, over decades, protecting paedophiles in all levels of society. The Metropolitan Police have lists of guilty people involved who go right to the top, ie, Edward Heath, Prime Minister and even higher…. The Cabal don’t want Pandora's box opened. It’s almost like the Epstein blackmail situation. BUT YES, we want that box opened, why is Starmer so corrupt? Et al….

[Rizotto]

I see Musk has stated Starmer will be gone soon…

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1876486484070731878
1876486484070731878

Good on Musk for exposing the perpetrators of these crimes in the UK. But what about child trafficking in the USA? The Epstein's child trafficking scandal for extortion for the benefit of Israel? Musk needs to get on this, especially since there were mostly American kids that were trafficked, and get Epstein's 'black book' published. Even if it contains the names of Mossad or zionist operatives. Especially if it contains the names of Mossad & zionist operatives. Musk, don't wait, get these criminals exposed and prosecuted now.

[Tintin]

Here's another shocking case that was aired by Channel 4 on December 18th (2024). This concerns the harrowing testimonies of three young women in the Barrow area (Cumbria). It is, as Charlie Peters shared in a comment on X, a strong piece of journalism.

Barrow victim breaks silence on grooming ordeal and justice denied

Y7bpSu_dpys

Published: 18 December, 2024
Channel: Channel 4 News
Run time: 29:26

Description:



This is a story about the grooming, rape and abuse of children in Barrow, Cumbria. Of girls sometimes still in their school uniform.

(Subscribe: https://bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)

It is a familiar tale - Rotherham and Rochdale now bywords for the historic grooming scandals which rocked the country - and from which famously, lessons were supposed to have been learned.

A month ago, three brothers were convicted of a raft of serious sexual offences against children across Barrow, and in Leeds. Any conviction of historical abuse must be seen as a success. But tonight we can reveal that police knew some of what was happening in Barrow as far back as 2009. It has taken 15 years for some of the abused girls to get justice.

Our report focuses on one young woman, Ellie Reynolds. She identified one of the brothers to police as her alleged abuser six years ago but her case never got to court. Instead, the authorities tried to prosecute her. She has taken the extraordinary step of waiving her right to anonymity to tell us what happened.

Barrow is a town which went to war with itself - after another girl's claims of abuse at the hands of an Asian grooming gang turned out to be lies.

For Ellie Reynolds, the legal process has kept her silent until now, when, for the first time, we can tell her story of justice denied.

Warning - this report contains descriptions of rape and sexual assault which some may find distressing.

If you’ve been affected by anything in this report, please go to https://www.channel4.com/support

[Tintin]

From Julie Bindel (https://x.com/thehonestlypod/status/1877414880539517380), journalist, recounting her experiences with legacy media when reporting on abuse cases. Quote: “When I first published my investigation into the grooming gangs in 2007 in The Sunday Times, The Guardian wouldn’t run it. The editor said that we would be seen as racist...I was absolutely sickened and appalled—and that cowardice remains today.”

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1877414385695563776/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/hXsCPT0_ja5w7EoD.mp4?tag=12

---

Gang rape of white girls – feminists are still turning a blind eye


Source: The Conservative Woman (https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/paul-t-horgan-feminists-turn-a-blind-eye-to-the-horrors-perpetrated-by-third-world-migrant-men-2/)
Author: Paul T. Horgan
Date: January 9th, 2025 (republished from original in 2016)

I wrote this article nine years ago pointing out that the sisterhood were not speaking up about grooming gangs, ‘honour’ killings, and female genital mutilation with the same strength they reserved for attacking white middle-class men for acts they perceived as sexist, or indeed their opposition to The Sun printing a photograph of a topless woman on Page 3. I mentioned Jess Phillips’s casual attitude to attacks on women in Cologne by third-world men on New Year’s Eve, 2014. It is noteworthy and depressing to see how little has changed since then. This article was first published under the heading ‘Feminists turn a blind eye to the horrors perpetrated by third-world migrant men (https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/paul-t-horgan-feminists-turn-a-blind-eye-to-the-horrors-perpetrated-by-third-world-migrant-men/)‘ on March 10, 2016


MY LATE father once said that in the USA to be a feminist was to be a Marxist lesbian. Well, steady on, Pops. It’s a stretch to restrict feminist activity to the sisters of Sappho, but on the Marxism angle, he was spot on.

Marxism is a particularly loathsome philosophy that has been directly or indirectly responsible for the deaths of millions of men, women and children. When Bertrand Russell was writing about Marxism in his History of Western Philosophy, he was forced to issue disclaimers so he did not have to explore how it was put into practice. And he was writing some 70 years ago. By that time millions had died, and millions more have died since.

Marxism encourages democide by explicitly championing one section of society to conduct a war of extermination upon another. It made ordinary people around the globe prisoners of their governments. Every Marxist government was obliged to establish security forces to prevent emigration of the disaffected to the point of using lethal force.


British feminism, steeped in the culture of Marxism, also has its enemy demographic. It is the white, middle-class male.

Three examples serve to illustrate this hatred.

Last June [2015], Professor Sir Tim Hunt, a Nobel Laureate, addressed a meeting in Seoul where he made some jocular remarks about the conduct of women in the laboratory. While the mainly female members of his audience took his words in good humour, the female members of the left-wing commentariat here attacked Sir Tim mercilessly by distorting what he said to its worst possible interpretation. This poor man, whose work in medicine can only be of benefit to humanity, was hounded out of his positions and has now left the country to work in New Zealand. The feminists did not care. They had won against their enemy.

In November 2014, there was great celebration as the European Space Agency managed to land a craft on the surface of a comet. Comets remain mysterious objects that can tell us a lot about the origins of our solar system as well as the beginnings of life on Earth. However, all this was swept aside by the feminists when Dr Matt Taylor appeared at a press conference wearing a shirt with racy illustrations of women on it. This poor man, whose father was a bricklayer in East London, was subject to such online vilification that he had to make an apology where he broke down in tears. Devoting his life to science and exploration, he was not a person to worry about sartorial matters. To its credit, the Guardian did not make an issue of this, unlike the online sisterhood.


However, there was no quarter given by the Guardian when solicitor Alexander Carter-Silk made a few flattering comments about human rights barrister Charlotte Proudman’s picture on a social media website. Instead of taking issue with Mr Carter-Silk through the site, Ms Proudman decided to share her outrage with the world through Twitter, whence it was taken up by the news media. For some reason, she believed that she had been a victim of sexual discrimination in her place of work, stating: ‘There is a continuum between receiving a sexist message on LinkedIn and being discriminated against in the workplace.’ The horror. The precise nature of this so-called ‘continuum’ that this person, who is paid to provide reasoned and articulate advocacy, had pronounced into existence does not seem to have been made clear, but it does seem to be as all-encompassing as the more famous Einsteinian counterpart. Perhaps Dr Matt Taylor could investigate it, if he dares.

Proudman is an archetype of the main beneficiary of modern British feminism, namely the white, middle-class female in employment. There are bonus points if said female works in the state sector or academia or specialises in law, the arts or humanities. Such people are seen as unimpeachable.


Feminism has no traction in the hard sciences. Since advancement is based on pure achievement and the peer-review process is gender-blind, it cannot be based on quotas or accusations of sexism. The Higgs boson was not discovered because the gender mix of the team was correct.

Feminism can provide no explanation for the rise and success of Margaret Thatcher. She earned not one but two university degrees, in science and law. As a wife and mother, she managed to be elected to a male-dominated parliament in 1959 and went on to have a ministerial career before becoming Prime Minister. And all this in an age which was, according to feminists, rife with sexism. Margaret Thatcher’s success was due to her sheer ability, not to positive discrimination. It demonstrated that any woman could make it to the top with sheer talent. No wonder she is such a hate-figure for the left. Feminists also have no answer to why no woman has been elected leader of the Labour Party [still the case in 2025].


The further women are from this white middle-class archetype, the less favoured they are by modern British feminism. And this is a serious problem in our country. In a way the feminists are like Alexander the Great, who wept when he discovered there were no more worlds left for him to conquer. Women in the UK have achieved equality in the cultural, social and professional spheres. Legally-enforceable protections mean that there is always a remedy for an injustice or inequality. Violence against women, once brushed under the carpet, is a major issue of law enforcement. However, the fact remains that there are women and girls living in the UK who are less white, less middle-class and less employed, and are thus are virtually ignored by activist left-wing feminism.

The most glaring omission by the feminists has to be the prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM), a practice so odious that I simply cannot bear to describe it beyond the term. There are currently more women living in this country as victims of this primitive and barbaric practice than there are lesbians in civil partnerships. And yet which has had more media visibility, more demonstrations on our streets? Perhaps my late father was right after all.


There are regular articles in the Guardian and elsewhere on FGM. There are also pressure groups, notably Daughters of Eve, but they are not mainstream. FGM has been criminalised in the UK since 1985. However, despite there being nearly 200,000 women in Britain who have been victims of this cruel crime, no one has been successfully prosecuted. It is ironic that feminists, whose consciousness was apparently first raised by Dr Germaine Greer’s book The Female Eunuch, have scant interest when one of their fellow women literally becomes one. Because it exclusively affects ethnic minorities, it is seen as a minority issue. Perhaps, according to the feminists, these British victims are not British enough. They are certainly not white middle-class women.

The barrier to action here by left-wing feminists is multiculturalism. This is the bogus belief that all cultures have equal merit and therefore all deserve equal respect. This takes no account of the fact that peoples from other cultures who settle here leave their places of origin because our culture has created an economic and social environment that will provide them with a better life than they could possibly enjoy had they stayed. It also means that, according to these feminists, our cultural values, including equal rights for women, can be safely ignored, because they only really apply to one of the many cultures in our country. Thus the only people who campaign against FGM are victims. There is no wider campaign or indeed greater visibility. And so frightened eight-year-old British girls go on being permanently maimed while being held down by their parents.


Rather than wear a t-shirt stating ‘No More FGM’, which would have been a worthy cause, Green MP Caroline Lucas chose to grace Parliament in 2013 with the slogan ‘No More Page Three’. Feminists have also protested about so-called ‘lad’s mags’ featuring topless women. At the time of the protest, these media items were on the way out. Page 3 and the magazines are gone. An easy, but pointless, win. The readership had already gone to the internet.

Lucas, however, will always play second fiddle to Britain’s top feminist, Harriet Harman. In 2014, Harman wore a t-shirt to Prime Minister’s Questions with the slogan ‘This is what a feminist looks like’ as part of a campaign by the Fawcett Society on women’s rights in the workplace. It emerged that this £45 t-shirt was made by women in sweatshop working conditions who were paid 62p an hour and slept 16 to a room. So what a feminist looks like is a cynical exploiter of cheap third-world labour for bogus ethical purposes. Sounds about right.


Another bogus assumption of feminism is that people who come from third-world countries with frankly third-world attitudes to women’s rights will somehow become enlightened when they step on to these shores. For some reason, the organised gang rapes perpetrated by men with third-world cultural backgrounds that took place in Rotherham in South Yorkshire and elsewhere are not seen as a feminist issue. While feminists abhor violence of any kind against women, it does appear that once again, because the victims were not middle-class women in work, there has been no popular protest by any feminist group or writers on anything like the scale that targeted Sir Tim Hunt, Dr Matt Taylor or Mr Alexander Carter-Silk. This is despite the fact that politicians, state officials and police officers through their wilful inaction facilitated the rapes in the name of community cohesion. Indeed the Guardian stated: ‘In last May [2014]’s local elections, Ukip won most votes and became the official opposition on the council. A march by the English Defence League during the campaign drew 500 supporters. On Tuesday, one of the first on Twitter with a gloating tweet was Nick Griffin of the BNP. In that context it is understandable that the Labour council was sensitive to the reputation of its Muslim community.’


This is actually a fiction designed to salve guilty consciences and to paper over the inconsistencies of political correctness. In Lancashire in 2011 there were 100 prosecutions for organised gang rape. In South Yorkshire for the same period, there were zero. Zero. Not that the feminists would ever point something like that out. It is not ‘understandable’ by them.

Politics and reputation were more important than organised gang rape. On this the feminists said nothing. This has to be because the feminists have nothing to say. So what is the point of feminism? Rotherham’s Strategic Director of Children’s and Young People’s Services, Joyce Thacker, quit her job with a £40,000 payout after being on sick leave for a while. By my reckoning, Thacker was paid about £5 per rape victim betrayed by Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council. No feminist protest there. This may be because Joyce Thacker was a white, middle-class woman in work in the state sector. As I mentioned before, in the feminist canon, she is unimpeachable.


Domestic violence and rape in marriage would appear to be important feminist issues. However, again when the victims do not conform to the archetype, they are ignored. The case of Shafilea Ahmed is an example. Shafilea was a 17-year-old British girl who was murdered by her parents because she refused to marry a man in her parents’ home country whom she had never met. She attempted suicide by swallowing bleach which caused her to be rejected by her potential suitor. Back home, she was murdered by her parents in their living room. This is not the only example of parental murder. However it is not seen as a mainstream feminist issue, despite the fact that the victims are British girls, but not Charlotte Proudman-British. And since the perpetrator is not a white, middle-class male, nothing is done by the feminists.

Compare the silence of the feminists here with the murder of Stephen Lawrence, a young man of Afro-Caribbean descent knifed to death at a south London bus stop in 1993. From the day of the murder, the pressure on the police was constant. After a change of government, there was a major public inquiry and major reforms in criminal investigation. There was a change in the law to facilitate double jeopardy prosecution.

By contrast, no laws were changed to protect future Shafileas, there were no protests, no inquiries. No one stood up for her. It was not seen as a political issue. No change of government has improved things. No one used her murder to discredit authority. Especially not the feminists. They were far too busy doing better things than saving lives or virtue.

British feminists have found an alternative to protesting about organised gang rape, FGM, community-based daughter-murder and forced marriage, which is to academicalise the issue. As women’s rights have increased to the point where they have equal rights and protections, there has been a growth in gender studies in colleges, which substitute observation, theorising and comment for protest and action over the physical dangers that face British girls and women when they are in contact with third-world male attitudes. Numerous papers and tomes are produced on the topic. All sound and fury cataloguing numerous intersecting ‘oppressions’, but signifying nothing. This is gentrified militancy, arguing over ever-narrower issues like, for example, whether feminism can ever find in sado-masochism an acceptable expression of womanhood.

To understand the modern left-wing feminist mentality, it is useful to analyse the comments made by Labour MP Jess Phillips on the BBC’s Question Time when she was forced to discuss the mass attacks by third-world migrants on German women in Cologne on New Year’s Eve. Jess did not want to discuss the topic for the reasons that modern feminism is always in second place to multiculturalism. She did not want to admit that men from other cultures are more sexist; according to her ideology that would be racist. So she clouded the issue, saying, ‘There is violence against women and girls that you are describing, a very similar situation to what happened in Cologne could be described on Broad Street in Birmingham every week, where women are baited and heckled.’

Here she tried to trivialise the issue, saying such behaviour is the norm in Europe (it is not) and comparing acts of robbery, indecent assault, and rape in Cologne with women being ‘baited and heckled’ in Birmingham. This is typical muddled socialist thinking, trying to find equality where none exists. Police in Birmingham state that they had five instances over eight weeks of the kinds of crimes perpetrated in Cologne on one night.

Phillips went on: ‘We have to attack what we perceive as being patriarchal culture coming into any culture that isn’t patriarchal, and making sure we tell people not to be like that.’

A direct, but rather mild attack against multiculturalism. But it has been sandwiched here between two pieces of nonsense. If Jess Phillips had just said this, she would not have attracted criticism. Note also, that despite years of Labour’s open-door immigration policy designed to ‘rub the Right’s noses in diversity’, it is only now that some Labour MPs are openly admitting that their party has imported third-world attitudes to women into this country.

And then she threw this in.

‘But we should be careful in this country before we rest on our laurels when two women are murdered every week.’

It is irrelevant in the context of the assaults by third-world migrants in Cologne. The statistic also makes no account for murders committed by the mentally ill. People were not being smug about violence against women in this country at all; there was no schadenfreude.

There are about 500 homicides annually in the UK. It is not okay that about one hundred of these are women, but that does mean that four hundred murder victims are men. Who will speak up for the men? Jess Phillips was making a political point about a murder statistic that is favourable to women as a way to distract from a third-world problem that is coming to the first world. Murder is bad. It is morally dubious to turn a single bald statistic into a feminist argument to divert attention from rape and indecent assault.

Left-wing feminism has a terrific blind spot about women oppressed in this country due to diversity in cultural values. The blind spot extends to rape, mutilation and murder. Governments of all shades have some responsibility here as well, being hobbled by fear of being seen as racist by vocal left-wing opposition for cracking down on unacceptable cultural values.

The hard fact is that women now have equal rights in this country which have been won after successful campaigns. Modern feminism has no answers to the ongoing persecution of women and girls by imported cultural values practised by closed communities. If they had any decency, the feminists would admit their failure and work harder for universal women’s rights in this country outside of their clear comfort zones instead of picking pointless political fights and non-stop virtue-signalling about bogus issues. But they cannot do so without being accused wrongly of being racists by opportunists. If they can’t save British girls and women from rape, mutilation, and murder, they need to step aside and let more competent forces do the job.

David Cameron, in his most recent party conference speech [October 2015], said the following: ‘For too long, we’ve been so frightened of causing offence that we haven’t looked hard enough at what is going on in our communities. This is passive tolerance. And I’ll tell you where it leads: to children, British children, going to Pakistan in the summer holidays, before they’ve even started their GCSEs, and forced to marry a man they’ve never met . . . children, British children, having their genitals mutilated, not just in a clinic in Lagos but the backstreets in Britain.
‘This passive tolerance has turned us into a less integrated country; it’s put our children in danger. It is unforgivable. So let me say it right here: no more passive tolerance in Britain. We’ve passed the laws – now I want them enforced. People who organise forced marriages – I want them prosecuted. Parents who take their children for FGM – I want them arrested.’

Left-wing feminism has encouraged passive tolerance for their own narrow political ends. Hundreds of thousands of girls and women have suffered as a result. Left-wing feminism has no credibility left. The casualty list is too long.

It is perhaps time for a new One-Nation Conservative feminism to lead the way, based on universal values of a woman’s right over her thoughts, her body and her economics that are currently undermined in the name of a bogus settlement of community relations. I do hope that, despite the tensions caused by the impending referendum, that David Cameron’s call for all British girls and women, regardless of their background, to have equal rights and protection is heeded. There must be more arrests and prosecutions of people who would do harm to British girls and women. Despite differences in race, colour, creed and opinion, they are our people in our country and they deserve like everyone else, our protection. And this dangerous and obsolete left-wing feminism can go to hell.

[rgray222]

Kemi Badenoch, Conservative Party leader, addresses Keir Starmer in the House of Commons:

https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a1mPEbP_460svav1.mp4

[norman]

The narrative is getting a shove off course even by Badenoch.

She stood up at PMs questions and said "We know that people were scared to tell the truth because they thought they would be called racist".

It's a trendy RaRa sound bite but it's not the heart of the matter.

I also listened the Liz Truss interview and for a politician I like Liz a lot but she wouldn't cross the line into the heart of the matter either. Although, she came very close when she told us that when she was Prime Minister she "had a gun held to her head".

The real power structure of the problem is hidden behind secret oaths to a secret master.

I'm waiting for the moment when that truth becomes the focus of the fight. Until it does, we are being dangerously strung along towards ending up contracted to serve the very same master they do.

[Bruce G Charlton]

Although this business is (if the facts be true) one of the worst evils in the entire history of Britain...

The fact that it is now being raised into a public outrage storm, in the mainstream media and officialdom and by Establishment figures such as Musk, after a decade (or two decades, depending on how you count), of inaction/making-things-worse -- strongly suggests to me that we are being manipulated for some ulterior and evil purpose.

This kind of public emoting is easily (and often has been) railroaded into adverse agendas. Almost never do such orchestrated outrages lead to effective preventive action against the abuse - the energy is all expended in feelings and words.

If we remain alert, this ulterior purpose will probably soon become apparent - I believe the intent may be to pave the way in public opinion for large-scale UK participation in war in the Middle East - which could entail military expansion - +/- conscription.

[norman]

So what are we going to do ?

Wave our team scarves and point our smart phone cameras at a ball game in politics, just because the players are wearing ®Empathy Corp' shirts. ?

[Matthew]

Time has not healed the anger over this. It's been carrying on for decades. Now the chickens are coming home to roost, much like a lot of other Brits, I'm too furious to be reasonable. God have mercy on the people guilty of hiding this because if it were up to me there wouldn't be much left of them. There's a trail of horrendous stories spanning SO MANY YEARS. If they don't do a full transparent job of "due process" the horror will only backlash at them... I almost wish it on them (God have mercy for me). But that's only hypothetical; we know due process will be a political joke so let me predict right now they'll try to weasel out of it and then it's going to get even hotter. Anyone remember that joke? "You should have seen the look on the monkeys face when he tried to put the cork back in". I'm adding nothing to the discussion, just venting. It takes 43 muscles in your face to frown, but it only takes two or three muscles to lunge out and slap someone in the face. :silent:

[BMJ]

This Is Truly Insane

wb9RttPk8q8

modernity
11/1/2025

Also this interesting comment from @aegeafamily717 1 day ago

The general public do not realise the absolute MASSIVE scale of this. I was director of childrens charity campaigning & raising awareness about CSE in UK... 2012-18. We are talking about MILLIONS of children here... not thousands.

The estimated figure in 2016 was OVER 1 MILLION.

We are nearly 10 years on, with a much larger perpetrator population. We are not talking 50 or 100 towns, we are talking EVERY town where these people are near. This is like Vikings, only WORSE. THIS IS HUNDREDS of towns & MILLIONS of children. Blair & Mandelson (search: Labour-sent-out-search-parties-to-entice-migrants-to-UK-Lord-Mandelson-comes-clean) imported a culture who see nothing wrong with taking the previous owners of the land's children, as sex slaves (they believe the land they step upon is theirs). The current estimate is OVER TWO MILLION GIRLS.

"Shut up for the sake of diversity." Is the ugliest most heinous crime... & enabled & supported by police, authorities & government. Head of CPS at time: Islamist promoter, child harmer starmer, who says you are right wing if you complain.

[Tintin]

The 2014 report commissioned by Rotherham Council is now in our library along with the explanatory note for the Communities and Local Government Select Committee on the scale of child sexual exploitation, referred to by the acronym CSE.

The full report running to over 150 pages can be viewed here (https://avalonlibrary.net/UK_Grooming_gangs/%5BREPORT%5D_Independent_Inquiry_into_Child_Sexual_Exploitation_in_Rotherham_1997-2013_%29Alexis_Jay_OBE%29.pdf), and the explanatory note, here (https://avalonlibrary.net/UK_Grooming_gangs/2014-10-22_%5BNOTE%5D_Explanatory_note_for_the_Communities_and_Local_Government_Select_Committee_on_the_scal e_of_child_sexual_exploitation_%28CSE%29_Alexis_Jay_OBE.pdf).

---
Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham 1997 - 2013
Explanatory note for the Communities and Local Government Select Committee on the scale of child sexual exploitation



1. No-one knows the true scale of sexual exploitation in Rotherham over the years. The Inquiry report makes this clear.
2. The Inquiry estimated that approximately 1400 children were sexually exploited over the full Inquiry period, from 1997 to 2013. This is a conservative estimate. The true scale is likely to be much higher.
3. In addition to the estimated 1400 victims, an unknown number of children were at risk of being exploited. (Chapter 4 page 29).

Why the true scale of CSE in Rotherham is not known.
4. South Yorkshire Police were unable to quantify the scale of the problem prior to 2013. In that year, the Force introduced a category for CSE.
5. From 2001, Children’s Social Care in Rotherham did have a category for child sexual exploitation. However, the code was not correctly utilised. For example, some child victims of sexual exploitation were wrongly classified as being out of control. This tells us something about past attitudes to child sexual exploitation, and the low priority given to keeping accurate records of the problem.
6. Even at the time of the Inquiry, Rotherham Children’s Services were unable to provide information about how many child victims were known, other than 51 cases that were being dealt with by the specialist CSE team.
7. In evidence given very recently to the Communities and Local Government Select Committee, the former Strategic Director of Rotherham’s Children Services stated that, in total, Rotherham Council knew 145 children who were victims/at risk of CSE. The Inquiry had asked for this information and Rotherham Council did not provide it. Indeed, Rotherham managers told the Inquiry that Rotherham Council did not know how many current CSE cases were currently being dealt with, beyond cases dealt with by the central CSE team.
8. Rotherham Council provided information to the Inquiry for 11 of the 16 years covered by the Inquiry. For these years, Children’s Social Care recorded 1402 contacts and 712 cases where the child was a victim of CSE.
9. The Council’s information systems were simply not good enough to provide accurate data about the scale of the problem over the Inquiry period. Data was missing for five out of the 16 years. For other years, particularly in the mid2000s, records from inter-agency meetings showed the Inquiry that the number of children being exploited was much higher than the numbers recorded by Children’s Social Care.
10.At key points over the years, for example in 2005 and again in 2007, multi-agency groups which were monitoring the problem of CSE were overwhelmed with referrals (97 cases being monitored in 2005 alone). The response of agencies was to remove large numbers of children from monitoring. This concealed the extent of the problem.

Information available to the Inquiry.
11.The starting point for the Inquiry’s estimate of 1400 victims was the aggregate figure of 1402 contacts known to Children’s Social Care over the period of 11 years. This was clearly an underestimate for the 16 years covered by the Inquiry.
12.In addition to aggregate data about contacts and caseloads, the Inquiry received information from case files and records of multi-agency discussions about child victims and other children known to be at risk. These were a total of 1475 children, in the following groups:

a) 988 children known to Children’s Social Care and/or the Police.
b) 412 additional children known to Risky Business and/or the Police and
Children’s Social Care.
c) Approximately 75 children who were groomed and abused by a sex offender
convicted in 2007.
13.Information not available to the Inquiry but directly relevant to estimating the true scale of exploitation included records of children discussed at the inter-agency ‘Key Players’ meetings. This group met regularly from 1999 to 2003. It monitored children who were exploited as well as suspected perpetrators. The records from these meetings could not be traced. However, the Inquiry was told by staff who were operational managers at the time that the meetings discussed hundreds of children over a period of approximately four years.

Sampling and file reading.
14.The Inquiry randomly sampled 66 cases and screened several hundred more cases from the lists of children monitored in inter-agency meetings. 5% of the cases sampled were found to be children at risk of CSE rather than victims.
15.The Inquiry also had access to residential care records for looked after children. From these notes it was clear that for several years - until around 2007 - child sexual exploitation was rife in units for looked after children and care leavers. From the records, it appeared that staff were powerless to protect looked after children. The Inquiry concluded that over a period of many years, children in residential care homes and care leavers were targeted and abused. This was not properly recorded in individual case files. A substantial number of these children will not be included in any of the above figures.
16.The file reading process is described on page 125 of the Inquiry report. The vast majority of cases sampled were children who had been victims of CSE, in many cases subjected to violence and great brutality.

Estimating the scale of child sexual exploitation.
17.File reading suggested that approximately 5% of children were at risk of CSE rather than known victims. When this was applied to the total figure of 1475 children (see paragraph 12), the estimated number of victims was 1401 children. A further 74 children were considered to be at risk of CSE.
18.It is clear that there was a substantial number of additional victims in residential care who were not included in these records. In addition, there are five years of missing case files and there is no indication that the scale of CSE during these years would have been any different.
19.From all these sources, the Inquiry estimated that the scale of sexual exploitation in Rotherham comprised at least 1,400 victims, and in all probability the true number was much higher. As far as possible, records were checked for double counting and allowances were made for that.
20.At the outset of the Inquiry, it was suggested to the Inquiry that the problem of CSE was exaggerated. The Inquiry found no evidence of this. The scale of the problem was clear from about 2003 onwards, and efforts should have been made to deal with it decisively, rather than downplay it.
21.We know that, in addition to issues of under-recording by South Yorkshire Police and Children’s Social Care, the problem is hidden because many children and parents are/were afraid to come forward and make complaints. Those who did so in the past were threatened and intimidated. Here is just one comment from the minutes of a multi-agency meeting:


“The methods are the same, e.g. where the girls are meeting, where they are picked up and girls going to Clifton Park, girls picked up at the petrol station in …..….. Road. The chair said this is a fairly grim situation. The men’s names
don’t change but the girls’ names change as they become too old to be useful. None of the girls will give a statement as they are scared….”(Strategy meeting, 2007 – attended by all the relevant agencies).

22.The estimate of at least 1400 children was the best estimate the Inquiry was able to make on the basis of the information available. It must be seen as a conservative estimate. Any errors in the estimate will have resulted in undercounting the numbers of victims.

Alexis Jay OBE.
Author of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham.
22 October 2014

---

Related article:

Stabbed in the head and dumped in a canal: How authorities failed grooming gang victims in Rotherham
Published in The Telegraph yesterday and authored by Sam Ashworth-Hayes
Archived here: https://archive.ph/1mj5v#selection-3037.4-3037.104

[rgray222]

https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/avyQNWE_700bwp.webp

[jaybee]

*
*

Damning report alleging deep connections between the Grooming/Rape Gangs AND the Labour Party...


The Labour Elites COMPLICIT in Muslim Grooming Gangs - Raja Miah (1:04:05)

6egrJ5Vi0o4



Politician Raja Miah has uncovered everything about the Labour Party’s links to the Muslim grooming gangs in the UK. He has faced all manner of attacks for his work - and it’s time to name names of those responsible for the cover up.

0:00 Raja Miah Highlights
1:30 Raja Miah’s Incredible Work
4:30 Failure of DBS Checks & Mosques Led By Offenders
7:00 Postal Votes & Labour’s Involvement
8:30 Islamic Cartels Collecting Postal Votes
10:30 Islamification of the UK
14:30 The Grooming Gangs
17:30 Labour: ‘Daddy’ is one of Ours
20:30 Oldham’s Shisha Bar Grooming Gangs
22:50 Labour Threatened to Sue Raja
25:30 Magistrate Asking Raja For Help
27:30 The Labour Leader Who Laughed at Raja
30:00 Bare…Faced…Lies!
32:30 The Police Missed 9 Times!
34:00 What About White Gangs
36:00 Mayor Andy Burnham Shoulda Known Better
38:10 What Maggie Oliver Had to Do!
40:30 Operation Hexagon!
45:10 How We Fight the Cover-Up
46:30 Dangerous People After Raja
49:00 Should We Have Compulsory Voting
53:00 Does Raja Feel Any Hope?
55:10 Mothin Ali & The Palestine Flags
57:30 Labour Making Muslims Feel Fear
1:00:30 A Heretic Raja Admires

[norman]

The narrative is getting a shove off course even by Badenoch.

She stood up at PMs questions and said "We know that people were scared to tell the truth because they thought they would be called racist".

It's a trendy RaRa sound bite but it's not the heart of the matter.

I also listened the Liz Truss interview and for a politician I like Liz a lot but she wouldn't cross the line into the heart of the matter either. Although, she came very close when she told us that when she was Prime Minister she "had a gun held to her head".

The real power structure of the problem is hidden behind secret oaths to a secret master.

I'm waiting for the moment when that truth becomes the focus of the fight. Until it does, we are being dangerously strung along towards ending up contracted to serve the very same master they do.


In this interview with Sarah Westall Raja Miah dips a toe in something I've been thinking about for a while, the partition of India and the near instant creation of Pakistan as a 'Muslim' laboratory in the toolkit of British 'Intelligence' with very little historic cultural inertia and probably zero administrative legal inertia. As blank slate as it gets and a Mengele style white coat wet dream.

Musk Helps Expose the Most Consequential Political Blackmail Operation in Modern British History (https://podbay.fm/p/1569103657/e/1763445600?t=332)
Sarah Westall - Nov 18, 2025

Show notes
Human rights activist Raja Miah joins the program to expose the Pakistani rape gangs that have infiltrated communities across England. Miah is not a typical whistleblower — he is a multi-decade, award-winning human rights advocate and a Muslim who has spent years fighting for vulnerable victims silenced by the system.

With the unexpected support of Elon Musk, Miah says he has avoided extended prison time and now has a platform to reveal abuses that reach into the highest levels of the British government. He also shares his deep frustration with the mainstream media’s refusal to cover what he believes is one of the most consequential scandals in modern British history.

You can follow Raja Miah at https://x.com/recusant_raja


https://rumble.com/v71t72k-musk-helps-expose-the-most-consequential-political-blackmail-operation-in-m.html?start=456

v6zmj2c/?pub=1yatds&start=575

[sdv]

Unfortunately, this issue becomes focused on religion and geopolitics. Epstein groomed and exploited young women and girls in full view of the wealthy elite. What is common with the Epstein case and the grooming gangs in the UK is that young women and young girls are being manipulated and abused and society has failed in protecting them. Another thing the two cases have in common is that the abusers are protected from accountability. Take the wealth and connections off the table for Epstein and the valid fear of rampant Islamophobia off the table in the UK and focus on the behaviour. However, in both cases the perpetrators are not necessarily committing a crime so it is up to parents and society to protect these young women ... and that is really difficult, especially in societies where individual freedom and independence are valued and encouraged from a young age, and where materialism is worshipped (so poor kids get lured by material 'reward'). In the UK, I find it understandable that people want government to deal with the problem, but I find that people like Musk ignore the complexity of the issue (note that he has never been present to parent his couple of dozen children) and encourage the 'demonization of other'. This is especially reckless with an ongoing and escalation of ethnic cleansing in Gaza.

[norman]

UK Column ‘On Location’ in Cheltenham: Raja Miah
UK Column - 2 hours ago


Join activist and campaigner Raja Miah on stage at our ‘On Location’ event in Cheltenham for an explosive exposé about institutionalised corruption.

In April 2025, the UK Column team went to Cheltenham for our first ‘On Location’ event of the year. The theme was ‘The Deep State’. Our speakers did not disappoint. It was a day of mind-blowing and revelatory information.


rZ2797n8S0I

[happyuk]

It hasn’t gone unnoticed that a lot of UK judges who are cracking down on freedom of speech etc… have a history of being lenient in their paedophilia sentencing.

The judge who sentenced Lucy Connell for example has to have a 24/7 armed security at his house now.

I don’t think many people have any sympathy. I certainly don’t.