Super Soldier Aaron McCollum "CONFRONTS" Colleen Thomas on Radio Show!!

[jackovesk]

Starts @ 27.30 mins

Arron McCollum Challenges Colleen Thomas's Bird & Fish Killing Phosgene/Mustard Gas claims @ 37.15 mins and her so called Telepathic Powers @ 53.15 mins including his opinion on her Russia Today interview claiming she has no Proof on her claims and questions her relationship to Jack Soferati who has links to the Military Industral Complex and Military Mind Control programs.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QBeY4lUFdU&feature=player_embedded

PS...

Let it be known, the likes of the 33/PTB "LOVE" Colleen Thomas because of all the air-time she is given on behalf of the Truth Movement!

She is the very type of person the 33 sit around the fireplace with their brandy and fat cigars and piss themselves laughing at!

I dare say the 33 & PTB would be all for, giving her as much air-time as possible!

Round 2 with Arron McCollum...

Starts @ 46.15 mins


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaRtDh3OQrM&feature=channel

[HeatherJJAnderson]

This is a repost from Camelot

Due to collaboration with a University, Aaron McCollum has a very detailed document explaining the levels of toxicity in and around the river. Silt samples and other information have been shared, that has been an ongoing study for the last five years.
The fish died of exposure not respiratory failure. To say it was Phosgene in this case is not logical. No other fish were dead; the Drum fish do have extremely high levels of aluminum on par with intensive chemical spraying over a long period of time. The detailed report shows the levels in and around the river, including toxicity, aluminum and trace levels of heavy metals. The information is astounding as the metal content of this river have quadrupled in the last five years to a very dangerous level.

No Phosgene gas and no Mustard gas were used, it does not matter what you believe, and these are the facts and are being presented as facts.

I have seen this report myself. I am a biologist and I can state that if these birds or fish died from either source, then trace elements would be present. Phosgene does not break down in liquid it dissolves. However internal organs such as the intestinal tract of birds would fully retain the Phosgene.

This is no attack, I am merely stating the facts that Colleen Thomas is wrong, I am giving my professional opinion, I have been told Dr waterman has also confirmed this.

If mustard gas was used the water would have broken the substance down, however the soil would have retained it and no levels of either compound were found.

In conclusion Aaron has done his homework and gathered information by professionals with objectivity and real research, Colleen Thomas who claims to be a physicist, might need to go back and look at the evidence and her theory again.

[Rozzy]

Arron McCollum makes my hair stand on end.

[modwiz]

I saw half of his interview with Dr. Brooks Agnew, the Hollow Earth researcher, before falling asleep. I was impressed with his organization and laying low to let the man speak. I hope to watch the other half tonight where the meatier details will unfold.

I look forward to more of his interviews if he stays within the style I observed last night. I don't think there were any jaguars were outside his door.

[astrid]

Im trying to listen/watch that first clip, but seriously what does Colleen's breasts have to do with this???

And her shower??

Man....

[Hybrid5226]

Im trying to listen/watch that first clip, but seriously what does Colleen's breasts have to do with this???

And her shower??

Man....
I listened to the show an it was awful .
Colleen made my head hurt an I do not know that much about Aaron but he presented the facts that he had an held it together but the people in the chat room . Man , I understand now why Bill is selective with his applications to this forum .

If people in that chat room could of picked up glass bottles an tossed them at Colleen they would have . Terrible .
Peace

[Rozzy]

It seems to me people are having a lot of trouble getting past the fact that Colleen is an attractive woman and that she feels quite comfortable with it. She claims no credentials beyond her experiences and says quite candidly that people can take or leave what she has to say. I listened to the whole program and was quite entertained, as with most of these things it can be taken with a grainery of salt.:cool:

[Helvetic]

Thought people have better things to research then watching all this nonsense.

[truthseekerdan]

Thought people have better things to research then watching all this nonsense.

Totally agree Helvetic! BTW, thanks for your great thread! (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?1383-The-Continuing-Search-For-The-Truth)

Namaste ~ Dan

[LM-R]

Totally agree Helvetic! BTW, thanks for your great thread! (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?1383-The-Continuing-Search-For-The-Truth)

Namaste ~ Dan


Thought people have better things to research then watching all this nonsense.

+2

Cant understand what people see in this rubbish, but each to their own.

[kersley]

+2

Cant understand what people see in this rubbish, but each to their own.

Why is it rubbish? is it because you don't understand? Some people are so traped in their little box and unable to think outside it.
Charles said that his master is 5000+ years old and that he can shed his skin, what would that make him? why do you find that colleen say's so far fetched?
when you get the time. download from youtube the videos from Barbara Marciniack-bringers of dawn / Earths library. It will answer most of the questions that is been asked here on this forum.
However. Aaron is right . Colleen should be responsible and back up what she says. but how can she do this?

Cheers
Kersley

[bashi]

This is a repost from Camelot

Due to collaboration with a University, Aaron McCollum has a very detailed document explaining the levels of toxicity in and around the river. Silt samples and other information have been shared, that has been an ongoing study for the last five years.
The fish died of exposure not respiratory failure. To say it was Phosgene in this case is not logical. No other fish were dead; the Drum fish do have extremely high levels of aluminum on par with intensive chemical spraying over a long period of time. The detailed report shows the levels in and around the river, including toxicity, aluminum and trace levels of heavy metals. The information is astounding as the metal content of this river have quadrupled in the last five years to a very dangerous level.

No Phosgene gas and no Mustard gas were used, it does not matter what you believe, and these are the facts and are being presented as facts.

I have seen this report myself. I am a biologist and I can state that if these birds or fish died from either source, then trace elements would be present. Phosgene does not break down in liquid it dissolves. However internal organs such as the intestinal tract of birds would fully retain the Phosgene.

This is no attack, I am merely stating the facts that Colleen Thomas is wrong, I am giving my professional opinion, I have been told Dr waterman has also confirmed this.

If mustard gas was used the water would have broken the substance down, however the soil would have retained it and no levels of either compound were found.

In conclusion Aaron has done his homework and gathered information by professionals with objectivity and real research, Colleen Thomas who claims to be a physicist, might need to go back and look at the evidence and her theory again.


Hi Heather,
as you claimed in the past to have knowledge of deep inside government projects, why don`t you spill some beans on the thread of Bright Garlick, this one here:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?12386-Lists-of-Secret-Projects

Kin2 was unable to do so, so my question: Can you prove yourself?

.

[LM-R]

Why is it rubbish? is it because you don't understand? Some people are so traped in their little box and unable to think outside it.
Charles said that his master is 5000+ years old and that he can shed his skin, what would that make him? why do you find that colleen say's so far fetched?
when you get the time. download from youtube the videos from Barbara Marciniack-bringers of dawn / Earths library. It will answer most of the questions that is been asked here on this forum.
However. Aaron is right . Colleen should be responsible and back up what she says. but how can she do this?

Cheers
Kersley

It's good to have an open mind but please not enough so that it can fall out.
Have you ever thought that maybe your too far out the box?
I understand completely and i think it's rubbish in MY opinion.
Who said i believe in everything Charles says? I certainly haven't so far. I haven't even watched the whole interview yet.
How about you stop making assumptions outside your box my friend. You know what they say about assuming?

[Rozzy]

One thing Colleen said was that people who pray to Yeshua are really praying to the Anunnaki with out knowing it. Sorry but that is patently false.
Yeshua is the Aramaic name for Jesus, (salvation) the actual name of Jesus in Hebrew is Yahushuah .
יהוה YHVH Yahuah The Name of The father, when you add the shu it becomes the name of the Son.

A lot of the Hebrew today is intermingled with Aramaic so depending on the purity of the language (biblical, modern, etc.) there are variables which occur today that reflect that.

[HeatherJJAnderson]

Hi Heather,
as you claimed in the past to have knowledge of deep inside government projects, why don`t you spill some beans on the thread of Bright Garlick, this one here:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?12386-Lists-of-Secret-Projects

Kin2 was unable to do so, so my question: Can you prove yourself?

.

Very well Bashi, I shall humor you.

In my profession most black operations do not utilize religious names such as project Ruth or Paul.

The type of programs you will find are not projects at all, project indicates that testing is underway but a black operation falls under the program classification and these are extremely different.

A name that should be looked into would be a budget justification, for a program such as Thermal Vector, White Knight, and many others. The strangest name I have seen was for a program titled Daktari Dust, a sister program of the Dust Off program.
Be aware that when working in a program it is unlikely that you will receive or hear about joint programs unless the programs require collaboration within it.

I see nothing in Garlics information that can be determined as fact. ‘I have yet to see is a list of supposed secret projects and their function.’ (Bright Garlick) Logic determines that these programs may not exist until evidence is provided that they do so.

[davyj0nes]

whats going on here, from dolphin boy super soldier to super star research analyst. the vids sound like fun, will check'em out definitely. maybe aaron and kerry can make an interview team.

[gripreaper]

So Coleen is in foreclosure and about to lose her house, and the realtor business is in the crapper and she has no income, so she decides to sell some "risque" photo's on the internet. Then she saves her house and starts reading all the "fringe" stuff on the internet, which she has complied into a CD which you can buy. Now' she's on the You Tube circuit and writing a book, which should be out soon. So stay tuned for the release of her blockbuster book!

See a pattern here?

[Teakai]

IMO Colleen Thomas came out on top.

[Rozzy]

IMO Colleen Thomas came out on top.


I think so too.:cool:

[bashi]

Very well Bashi, I shall humor you.

In my profession most black operations do not utilize religious names such as project Ruth or Paul.

The type of programs you will find are not projects at all, project indicates that testing is underway but a black operation falls under the program classification and these are extremely different.

A name that should be looked into would be a budget justification, for a program such as Thermal Vector, White Knight, and many others. The strangest name I have seen was for a program titled Daktari Dust, a sister program of the Dust Off program.
Be aware that when working in a program it is unlikely that you will receive or hear about joint programs unless the programs require collaboration within it.

I see nothing in Garlics information that can be determined as fact. ‘I have yet to see is a list of supposed secret projects and their function.’ (Bright Garlick) Logic determines that these programs may not exist until evidence is provided that they do so.

I am waiting for you to spill some real beans on the forum...:photo: