PDA

View Full Version : Did CIA Remote Viewers Find the Ark of the Covenant?



Mark (Star Mariner)
27th March 2025, 14:18
^ Don't ask me, I'm just the messenger, but according to these 'documents' they did. But caution: I cannot vouch for their provenance. There are millions of 'document finds' out there, and it's impossible to know what's fake and what's real. This is posted bearing that due caution in mind. Makes for an interesting read though:

Project SUN STREAK:
Date: December 5th, 1988
Target: The Ark of the Covenant

First two pages:
54703

54702

Quote:

Target is a container. This container has another container inside of it. The target is fashioned of wood, gold and silver. The target is similar in shape to (AOL) a coffin, and is decorated with seraphim (see sketch pg. 16).

This target is located somewhere in the Middle East as the language spoken by individuals present seemed to be Arabic. Visuals of surrounding buildings indicated the presence of Mosque Domes (?) , (see page 12) . Individuals in the area were clothed in virtually all white, had black hair and dark eyes — one figure I homed in on wore a moustache .

The target is hidden — underground, dark and wet were ail aspects of the location of the target.

The purpose of the target is to bring a people together (see page 16). It has something to do with ceremony, memory, homage, the resurrection. There is an ^ aspect of spirituality, information, lessons and historical knowledge far beyond what we now know.

The target is protected by entities (see page 14) and can only be opened (now) by those who are authorized to do so — this container will not/cannot be opened until the time is deemed correct. Once it is time to open the container — the mechanics of the lock system will be found to be fairly simple. Individuals opening the container by prying or striking are destroyed by the container’s protectors (see page 17) through the use of a power unknown to us.

Me:
https://media.tenor.com/ZMlYoFXVCLgAAAAM/indiana-jones-face-melting.gif

Full Document archive here: https://archive.org/details/CIA-RDP96-00789R001300180002-7/mode/1up?view=theater
Twitter thread here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1905000332586868832.html?utm_campaign=topunroll

Rizotto
28th March 2025, 08:31
Skeptic here. My PSYOP detector flashed a red alert on this one. I haven't previously seen anything from remote viewers so detailed and specific.

On the other hand, the use of the word "seraphim" is highly suspect, as it is relatively well-known to be associated with the 'arc of the covenant', as per biblical wording. But the thing is, what does a seraphim look like? How many of you here know what a seraphim is supposed to look like? I don't. Remote viewing is about 'viewing' specifically. If this was indeed a true remote viewing session with a double-blind target, the remote viewer would have been describing the strange object's shape & colour. Not call it 'seraphim', which is a giveaway of where this is going.

Also the timing of this 'declassification' is extraordinarily coincidental with the soon to be completed ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, and the ardent efforts of zionists to have the Al-Aqsa mosque removed, a 'domed' mosque, as referred to in the above 'declassification'. So that by claiming that the 'arc of the covenant' is hidden under the Al-Aqsa mosque gives the zionists a stronger reason for claiming the area for Israel and remove Palestinians and their mosque.

My conclusion is that this 'declassified' document is just a recent forgery. Possibly the zionist control over the CIA is stronger than we ever suspected.

Why would the CIA be concerned about the 'arc of the covenant' back then anyway.

Edited to add:
I just saw that the bible's description of the 'arc of covenant' refers to "cherubim", not 'seraphim'. Both are mentioned in the bible. Mostly depicted as winged angels, so 'seraphim' and 'cherubim' are two different types of angels? I'm rather confused at this point.

gord
31st March 2025, 14:37
This recent video from Edward Riordan (Future Forecasting Group, formerly CryptoViewing) has a very short bit relating to this thread's topic mostly from around 28:58-30:13, although it actually begins around 26:00.

Short answer: the media stumbled across something they didn't understand, and immediately misrepresented it.

A Chat with Remote Viewer Paul H. Smith. UAP's and Arks of Covenants...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BsU5YgLPQ4