What is mainstream science hiding?

[Rawhide68]

I find Ruperts works not just entertaining, but also mindblowing

h_b7f9rvDrA

[Losus4]

Got a summary for that 30 minute video other than "it's a good video"?

[peace]

will watch. but i'm convinced it's something with scalar tech and time travel. and 100 other things we don't know much about. thanks for this

[arjunaloka_official]

...summaries are nowadays a 1 minute effort, created with talkai.info (chat GPT4 for free) based on the youtube transcript (not perfect, but gives you the big picture):

AI generated content:
• People are afraid to step out of line due to fear of attack or social reprisals.
• Robert has a background in biochemistry but shifted focus to parapsychology, telepathy, and consciousness.
• The scientific community has historically been critical and dismissive of his ideas, labeling them heretical or pseudoscientific.
• Despite mainstream rejection, Robert’s ideas have gained a strong following among the general public.
• His early work, such as "A New Science of Life" (1981), was heavily denounced by prominent figures like Sir John Maddox of Nature, who called it "a book for burning."
• The core hostility from scientists often comes from militant atheists who see his ideas as a threat to mechanistic materialism.
• A small, powerful minority controls scientific discourse via funding, top journals, and academic positions, silencing dissenting voices.
• Robert emphasizes that science lacks a culture of genuine debate, with orthodoxy prevailing over plurality of ideas.
• He views scientific models as interpretive tools rather than ultimate truths, advocating for open debate on competing worldviews.
• His theory of morphic resonance suggests that memory and influence extend through space and time via a kind of collective memory in nature.
• He compares his model to historical scientific shifts, like Faraday's fields evolving into Maxwell's electromagnetism, emphasizing that models change over time.
• The potential applications of his theories include improving learning, memory treatments, and creating "morphic resonance" computers for collective memory.
• He believes that training intuitive skills could enhance people's ability to anticipate dangers or environmental changes.
• Key evidence for phenomena like "feeling stared at" is robust, with numerous experiments and long-term studies, such as those at the science museum in Amsterdam.
• Critics dismiss such evidence as impossible, often refusing to fairly evaluate the data, exemplified by figures like Steven Pinker and Michael Shermer.
• Robert argues that evidence is often disregarded because it threatens deeply held mechanistic beliefs, not because of misinterpretation.
• He admits to holding philosophical beliefs about a universal consciousness, which he considers integral to his understanding of reality.
• Despite this, he is open to revising his theories if better explanations emerge, emphasizing that his ideas are models, not final truths.
• His public success stems from making complex ideas accessible and tapping into common experiences of phenomena like telepathy and intuition.
• He actively works to develop experiments and apps (e.g., for telepathy and "sense of being stared at") to mainstream these phenomena through competitions and scientific validation.
• The ultimate goal is to demonstrate that these phenomena are real and socially accepted, transforming them from marginal beliefs into recognized facts.
• Robert highlights that many ordinary people already accept and experience these phenomena, which are often dismissed by mainstream science.
• He advocates for a culture within science that allows for alternative ideas, open discussion, and recognition of dissenting views.
• His work exemplifies the tension between scientific orthodoxy and the pursuit of alternative, empirically testable models of consciousness and reality.

[peace]

Believe i'm related to this maxwell fella. kinda funny. (means NOTHING and I have no ties to anything but my side of that family.)

of all the crap to realize.

[HopSan]

I find Ruperts works not just entertaining, but also mindblowing

h_b7f9rvDrA

Thanks,

I have followed his very patient SCIENTIFIC project since 1980's.
Much of it has held -- in front of the test of time.

My personal Computer Science -project of 35 years (about 'semantics', etc.) seems to agree in much with Sheldrake.

If you like DEEP thinkers -- with no Tarot, New age, Evil Nazis,

Enjoy!