ExomatrixTV
16th August 2025, 19:41
Alex Jones & Infowars Under Deep State Siege - Demanding 1.3 Billion Dollars Continues in August 2025
hEOeIijra7M
infowars.com (https://infowars.com)
banned.video (https://banned.video)
Grok 4 Live Deep Search Report:
In August 2025, a Texas judge ordered the appointment of a receiver to oversee and sell Infowars' assets to help satisfy the approximately $1.3 billion in defamation judgments against Alex Jones stemming from his statements about the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting. This development has been portrayed by some conservative alternative media voices and their supporters as an example of "unjust lawfare" orchestrated by the "deep state" to silence Jones and suppress free speech. Below, I summarize key reactions from conservative alternative media networks and associated accounts on the specified platforms. These reactions emphasize themes like political persecution, excessive penalties, and threats to conservative voices. Note that "alternative media networks" here include outlets like Infowars itself, The New American, and related podcasts/vlogs with conservative leanings.
August 2025 Reactions from mainstream sources or those not portraying the case as unjust were excluded. "ALL reactions" is impossible to capture exhaustively, so this represents a comprehensive sampling based on available data.
Reactions from X
Several posts from conservative-leaning accounts and Infowars-affiliated users framed the ruling as deep state interference and an attack on free speech.
@InfoWars_tv (Infowars fan account, alternative media aggregator)August 10, 2025"🚨 ALEX JONES ERASED 🚨 🚨Aug 13th, 2025 Court Hearing Democrat Lawyers and the DOJ Collude To Steal Alex Jones Identity, Social Media and Video Archives then COPYRIGHT it ALL, to Force All Platforms to Remove All INFOWARS and ALEX JONES Content." This post portrays the legal actions as a coordinated DOJ/Democrat conspiracy to erase Jones, calling it a theft and collusion.
"Everything that has happened to Alex Jones is unbelievable. Free Speech is a joke when things like this are allowed to happen... If he wasn't a threat to the Deep State, they wouldn't be after him for $1.3 Billion. The amount isn't even rational. If they can do it to him- they can do it to any of us." This reaction explicitly calls the penalties irrational and a deep state threat to conservatives.
..shocked that Alex + crew carried an ocean of Trump's water... yet somehow DOJ can't pull some procedural move... That Trump's DOJ won't help defend Alex from injustice means it's now Trump crushing Infowars..." Views the lack of intervention as injustice and political betrayal.
"These people would rather see Jones unjustly lose his company than find out Epsteins client list." Portrays the asset seizure as unjust and a distraction from larger conspiracies. Another: "Reddit is running a monopoly... google refuses to give you any relevant topics — because he is right about a TON." Suggests suppression by big tech/deep state allies.
In August 2025, the ongoing legal actions against Alex Jones and Infowars—specifically the Texas district court ruling appointing a receiver to sell assets for $1.3 billion in defamation judgments—continued to elicit reactions from conservative alternative media networks and their supporters. These reactions frame the developments as "unjust lawfare," deep state persecution, weaponization of the justice system, and attempts to silence independent voices. The provided YouTube transcript from Luke Rudkowski (WeAreChange channel) is a prime example: Rudkowski describes the ruling as absurd, fraudulent, and part of a deep state effort to destroy Jones' legacy without allowing him a defense, while including clips from MSM sources like ABC, NPR, and MSNBC to contrast their "biased" celebration. He calls it "cruel and unusual punishment" and predicts a Streisand effect, urging support for Jones. This video, uploaded around August 2025 (exact date not confirmed, but content references "just a few hours ago"), has garnered 13,630 views and aligns with conservative alt media narratives.
Searches focused on content from August 1-16, 2025, or directly referencing the receiver appointment/asset sale. As before, exhaustive capture of "ALL reactions" isn't feasible, but this is a comprehensive sampling from conservative-leaning sources. Sparse results on non-X platforms may reflect limited indexing or content migration to X/Rumble.
Luke Rudkowski, founder of the independent media outlet WeAreChange, delivers a passionate defense of Alex Jones and Infowars in his YouTube video titled "🚨Alex Jones & Infowars Under Deep State SIEGE" (uploaded circa August 2025, with 13,630 views and 1,088 likes as of recent data). In the approximately 20-minute monologue, Rudkowski frames the August 2025 Texas court ruling—appointing a receiver to sell Infowars' assets to satisfy $1.3 billion in defamation judgments—as an egregious example of "deep state" lawfare aimed at silencing independent voices. He portrays Jones as a victim of a weaponized justice system, accuses Democrats, the DOJ, and mainstream media (MSM) of collusion and bias, and predicts a "Streisand effect" that will amplify Jones' influence. Interspersed with clips from MSM outlets like ABC, NPR, and MSNBC, Rudkowski critiques their "vengeful" coverage while sharing personal anecdotes from his 20-year history with Jones. He urges viewers to support Jones and promotes his own platform, emphasizing free speech and alternative media's role in countering establishment narratives. Overall, Rudkowski's perspective is unapologetically pro-Jones, blending conspiracy elements with calls for unity among conservatives, while acknowledging past disagreements but crediting Jones as a pioneer.
This report synthesizes Rudkowski's views into a structured analysis, highlighting his key arguments, rhetorical strategies, and implications for broader conservative discourse. It draws directly from the provided transcript, noting potential speech-to-text errors (e.g., "Strand effect" likely means "Streisand effect").
Luke Rudkowski's Background and Context
Luke Rudkowski is a veteran independent journalist and activist, best known for founding WeAreChange in 2006 as a grassroots movement focused on 9/11 truth, government accountability, and anti-globalist themes. His channel, with a history of confrontational interviews and conspiracy-oriented content, positions itself as an alternative to MSM. In this video, Rudkowski leverages his personal relationship with Jones—describing a "tumultuous 20-year history" that included differences but ended in reconciliation—to lend authenticity. He mentions shared dinners (e.g., with Tim Pool in Austin) and mutual respect, framing himself as an ally in the fight against "globalists" and "demons." The video serves dual purposes: defending Jones amid the August 2025 ruling by Texas District Court Judge Maya Guerra Gamble and promoting Rudkowski's subscription site (lukeunfiltered.com) for events like range days and networking.
Core Perspective: The Ruling as Unjust Lawfare
Rudkowski views the court-ordered asset sale not as legitimate justice but as a coordinated deep state assault on free speech. He emphasizes absurdity and unfairness, arguing the $1.3 billion penalty is "vengeful" and "banana republic ****," disproportionate to Jones' statements about Sandy Hook (which Rudkowski notes Jones has apologized for). Key themes include:
Weaponization of the Justice System: Rudkowski claims Jones was denied due process, stating, "Alex never even got to argue his side of the story... No, you're guilty." He ties this to broader patterns, like the DOJ's alleged involvement via Project Veritas exposes, where funds from charities linked to Sandy Hook families were funneled to Democrat law firms.
Deep State Collusion: He accuses Democrats, the DOJ, CIA, and FBI of orchestrating the lawsuits, citing undercover footage: "We investigated Jones... couldn't find anything. So we went and did this whole Sandy Hook thing." Rudkowski portrays this as part of a larger effort to "erase" Jones' legacy, including attempts to seize his social media, archives, and even his cat.
Fraud in the Process: Referencing the failed Onion bid (overturned for not being the highest), he calls it "cooked" and fraudulent, noting higher offers were ignored to allow The Onion to mock Jones: "Steal from a man and then take his own site and use it as a way to attack him."
Not About Compensation, But Destruction: Rudkowski stresses the goal is "punishing" Jones for being a "fortune teller" who's "been a lot more right than wrong," rather than financial redress. He argues the families raised "hundreds of millions" off Jones' name via ads, turning the case into a profitable "PR campaign."
Rhetorical Strategies and Included Elements
Rudkowski employs vivid, emotive language (e.g., "sick and twisted," "cruel and unusual punishment") to rally viewers, contrasting Jones' hard work (e.g., 4-hour daily shows, 7 days a week) with the establishment's "pettiness." He integrates audio/visual clips from MSM sources to dismantle their narratives:
ABC News: Highlights the receiver appointment; Rudkowski calls it an attempt to take Jones' "past catalogues and records."
NPR: Labels Jones a "conspiracist"; he retorts Jones is a "spoiler alert" with accurate predictions (e.g., "Alex Jones's right jar stacked with cash").
MSNBC (Jen Psaki clip): Mocks their glee ("Finally... close up shop") and bias in photo choices (angry Jones vs. smiling host), accusing them of fake news like Russian collusion.
He predicts a backlash: "This is only going to create the Streisand effect... make people want to support Alex more." Rudkowski positions Jones as the "tip of the spear" for alternative media, warning that his downfall sets a "chilling effect" for others, including himself: "Soon as they topple him, then they go after everybody else."
Personal touches include Rudkowski's history with Jones ("settled our differences") and promotions for positive activities (e.g., range days, networking) over "horrible stuff" like gambling or junk food, aligning with his legacy-building ethos.
Implications and Broader Resonance
From Rudkowski's lens, this case exemplifies how the "free market of ideas" favors independents like Jones, who "eviscerated" MSM by being "better." He urges sharing the video and supporting Jones' backups, framing it as a battle for humanity's awakening. While acknowledging disagreements (e.g., "I disagreed with it, too" on Sandy Hook claims), he credits Jones for paving pathways.
Rudkowski's call to action reinforces community-building in alternative media, potentially amplifying the very effect he predicts.
hEOeIijra7M
infowars.com (https://infowars.com)
banned.video (https://banned.video)
Grok 4 Live Deep Search Report:
In August 2025, a Texas judge ordered the appointment of a receiver to oversee and sell Infowars' assets to help satisfy the approximately $1.3 billion in defamation judgments against Alex Jones stemming from his statements about the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting. This development has been portrayed by some conservative alternative media voices and their supporters as an example of "unjust lawfare" orchestrated by the "deep state" to silence Jones and suppress free speech. Below, I summarize key reactions from conservative alternative media networks and associated accounts on the specified platforms. These reactions emphasize themes like political persecution, excessive penalties, and threats to conservative voices. Note that "alternative media networks" here include outlets like Infowars itself, The New American, and related podcasts/vlogs with conservative leanings.
August 2025 Reactions from mainstream sources or those not portraying the case as unjust were excluded. "ALL reactions" is impossible to capture exhaustively, so this represents a comprehensive sampling based on available data.
Reactions from X
Several posts from conservative-leaning accounts and Infowars-affiliated users framed the ruling as deep state interference and an attack on free speech.
@InfoWars_tv (Infowars fan account, alternative media aggregator)August 10, 2025"🚨 ALEX JONES ERASED 🚨 🚨Aug 13th, 2025 Court Hearing Democrat Lawyers and the DOJ Collude To Steal Alex Jones Identity, Social Media and Video Archives then COPYRIGHT it ALL, to Force All Platforms to Remove All INFOWARS and ALEX JONES Content." This post portrays the legal actions as a coordinated DOJ/Democrat conspiracy to erase Jones, calling it a theft and collusion.
"Everything that has happened to Alex Jones is unbelievable. Free Speech is a joke when things like this are allowed to happen... If he wasn't a threat to the Deep State, they wouldn't be after him for $1.3 Billion. The amount isn't even rational. If they can do it to him- they can do it to any of us." This reaction explicitly calls the penalties irrational and a deep state threat to conservatives.
..shocked that Alex + crew carried an ocean of Trump's water... yet somehow DOJ can't pull some procedural move... That Trump's DOJ won't help defend Alex from injustice means it's now Trump crushing Infowars..." Views the lack of intervention as injustice and political betrayal.
"These people would rather see Jones unjustly lose his company than find out Epsteins client list." Portrays the asset seizure as unjust and a distraction from larger conspiracies. Another: "Reddit is running a monopoly... google refuses to give you any relevant topics — because he is right about a TON." Suggests suppression by big tech/deep state allies.
In August 2025, the ongoing legal actions against Alex Jones and Infowars—specifically the Texas district court ruling appointing a receiver to sell assets for $1.3 billion in defamation judgments—continued to elicit reactions from conservative alternative media networks and their supporters. These reactions frame the developments as "unjust lawfare," deep state persecution, weaponization of the justice system, and attempts to silence independent voices. The provided YouTube transcript from Luke Rudkowski (WeAreChange channel) is a prime example: Rudkowski describes the ruling as absurd, fraudulent, and part of a deep state effort to destroy Jones' legacy without allowing him a defense, while including clips from MSM sources like ABC, NPR, and MSNBC to contrast their "biased" celebration. He calls it "cruel and unusual punishment" and predicts a Streisand effect, urging support for Jones. This video, uploaded around August 2025 (exact date not confirmed, but content references "just a few hours ago"), has garnered 13,630 views and aligns with conservative alt media narratives.
Searches focused on content from August 1-16, 2025, or directly referencing the receiver appointment/asset sale. As before, exhaustive capture of "ALL reactions" isn't feasible, but this is a comprehensive sampling from conservative-leaning sources. Sparse results on non-X platforms may reflect limited indexing or content migration to X/Rumble.
Luke Rudkowski, founder of the independent media outlet WeAreChange, delivers a passionate defense of Alex Jones and Infowars in his YouTube video titled "🚨Alex Jones & Infowars Under Deep State SIEGE" (uploaded circa August 2025, with 13,630 views and 1,088 likes as of recent data). In the approximately 20-minute monologue, Rudkowski frames the August 2025 Texas court ruling—appointing a receiver to sell Infowars' assets to satisfy $1.3 billion in defamation judgments—as an egregious example of "deep state" lawfare aimed at silencing independent voices. He portrays Jones as a victim of a weaponized justice system, accuses Democrats, the DOJ, and mainstream media (MSM) of collusion and bias, and predicts a "Streisand effect" that will amplify Jones' influence. Interspersed with clips from MSM outlets like ABC, NPR, and MSNBC, Rudkowski critiques their "vengeful" coverage while sharing personal anecdotes from his 20-year history with Jones. He urges viewers to support Jones and promotes his own platform, emphasizing free speech and alternative media's role in countering establishment narratives. Overall, Rudkowski's perspective is unapologetically pro-Jones, blending conspiracy elements with calls for unity among conservatives, while acknowledging past disagreements but crediting Jones as a pioneer.
This report synthesizes Rudkowski's views into a structured analysis, highlighting his key arguments, rhetorical strategies, and implications for broader conservative discourse. It draws directly from the provided transcript, noting potential speech-to-text errors (e.g., "Strand effect" likely means "Streisand effect").
Luke Rudkowski's Background and Context
Luke Rudkowski is a veteran independent journalist and activist, best known for founding WeAreChange in 2006 as a grassroots movement focused on 9/11 truth, government accountability, and anti-globalist themes. His channel, with a history of confrontational interviews and conspiracy-oriented content, positions itself as an alternative to MSM. In this video, Rudkowski leverages his personal relationship with Jones—describing a "tumultuous 20-year history" that included differences but ended in reconciliation—to lend authenticity. He mentions shared dinners (e.g., with Tim Pool in Austin) and mutual respect, framing himself as an ally in the fight against "globalists" and "demons." The video serves dual purposes: defending Jones amid the August 2025 ruling by Texas District Court Judge Maya Guerra Gamble and promoting Rudkowski's subscription site (lukeunfiltered.com) for events like range days and networking.
Core Perspective: The Ruling as Unjust Lawfare
Rudkowski views the court-ordered asset sale not as legitimate justice but as a coordinated deep state assault on free speech. He emphasizes absurdity and unfairness, arguing the $1.3 billion penalty is "vengeful" and "banana republic ****," disproportionate to Jones' statements about Sandy Hook (which Rudkowski notes Jones has apologized for). Key themes include:
Weaponization of the Justice System: Rudkowski claims Jones was denied due process, stating, "Alex never even got to argue his side of the story... No, you're guilty." He ties this to broader patterns, like the DOJ's alleged involvement via Project Veritas exposes, where funds from charities linked to Sandy Hook families were funneled to Democrat law firms.
Deep State Collusion: He accuses Democrats, the DOJ, CIA, and FBI of orchestrating the lawsuits, citing undercover footage: "We investigated Jones... couldn't find anything. So we went and did this whole Sandy Hook thing." Rudkowski portrays this as part of a larger effort to "erase" Jones' legacy, including attempts to seize his social media, archives, and even his cat.
Fraud in the Process: Referencing the failed Onion bid (overturned for not being the highest), he calls it "cooked" and fraudulent, noting higher offers were ignored to allow The Onion to mock Jones: "Steal from a man and then take his own site and use it as a way to attack him."
Not About Compensation, But Destruction: Rudkowski stresses the goal is "punishing" Jones for being a "fortune teller" who's "been a lot more right than wrong," rather than financial redress. He argues the families raised "hundreds of millions" off Jones' name via ads, turning the case into a profitable "PR campaign."
Rhetorical Strategies and Included Elements
Rudkowski employs vivid, emotive language (e.g., "sick and twisted," "cruel and unusual punishment") to rally viewers, contrasting Jones' hard work (e.g., 4-hour daily shows, 7 days a week) with the establishment's "pettiness." He integrates audio/visual clips from MSM sources to dismantle their narratives:
ABC News: Highlights the receiver appointment; Rudkowski calls it an attempt to take Jones' "past catalogues and records."
NPR: Labels Jones a "conspiracist"; he retorts Jones is a "spoiler alert" with accurate predictions (e.g., "Alex Jones's right jar stacked with cash").
MSNBC (Jen Psaki clip): Mocks their glee ("Finally... close up shop") and bias in photo choices (angry Jones vs. smiling host), accusing them of fake news like Russian collusion.
He predicts a backlash: "This is only going to create the Streisand effect... make people want to support Alex more." Rudkowski positions Jones as the "tip of the spear" for alternative media, warning that his downfall sets a "chilling effect" for others, including himself: "Soon as they topple him, then they go after everybody else."
Personal touches include Rudkowski's history with Jones ("settled our differences") and promotions for positive activities (e.g., range days, networking) over "horrible stuff" like gambling or junk food, aligning with his legacy-building ethos.
Implications and Broader Resonance
From Rudkowski's lens, this case exemplifies how the "free market of ideas" favors independents like Jones, who "eviscerated" MSM by being "better." He urges sharing the video and supporting Jones' backups, framing it as a battle for humanity's awakening. While acknowledging disagreements (e.g., "I disagreed with it, too" on Sandy Hook claims), he credits Jones for paving pathways.
Rudkowski's call to action reinforces community-building in alternative media, potentially amplifying the very effect he predicts.