PDA

View Full Version : Are we in the Kali Yuga?



onawah
8th December 2025, 21:02
The Yugas: How An Ancient Doctrine Of Cyclical Time Solves The Mystery Of the Great Pyramid
The Hermetic Age #008: The Divine History of Sri Yukteswar
Dan/World Astrology ReportDan
Dec 08, 2025
https://substack.com/home/post/p-181014000

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!6cuA!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F92727a0e-49d7-4fa5-808d-2d79bf57d035_1024x1024.webp

"The revision to the Indian yuga cycle doctrine of cyclical time by the Indian mystic Swami Sri Yukteswar Giri holds extraordinary explanatory power. It provides an elegant explanation for many of the enduring mysteries of history, including the greatest mystery of all: the Great Pyramid of Giza.

Astrology’s greatest gift is its ability to confer meaning on the twists and turns of fortune, to help us perceive structure and purpose in life where otherwise we might see only chaos and contingency. In and of themselves, the succession of vicissitudes that make up the story of a life often mean little. When seen from the panoramic scale astrology provides, their purpose can come into sharp focus.

A consulting astrologer is treated regularly to vivid demonstrations of how strokes of apparent bad luck—the ending of a relationship, the loss of a job, a debilitating illness—play a role in driving a life where it needs to go. A client might come to realise: “It hurt to get fired from the bar, but if it hadn’t been for that, I’d never have taken up meditation…” To perceive purpose in life, we have to zoom out.

The same is true of history.

In The Astounding Astrology Of The Axial Age, we saw how an extremely rare triple conjunction of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto around 577 BC coincided with the dawn of Karl Jaspers’ Axial Age, a time when the seeds of almost all the major faiths of the world today were sown. Remarkable figures, including the Buddha, Pythagoras and Confucius, walked the Earth at the same time, teaching human beings new ways of being, living together or achieving transcendence.

But we might well ask: why then? Why 577 BC? An astrologer’s answer might simply be: because the planets said so. Because it was time. But we can do better—if we zoom out.

This series was originally intended as a study of the 492-year Pluto-Neptune synodic cycle, something I’ve spent recent years thinking deeply about. I thought I could tell a compelling story about modernity through the lens of this single cycle.

I’ve since come to feel that this tight focus would leave too much unsaid. The tale needed a more cosmic perspective. It needed context—and that context will come from understanding a far longer cycle, one embedded in the mythical traditions of ancient people across the world: the precession of the equinoxes.

The doctrine of the Yugas
The precession of the equinoxes, whereby the stars rising at a fixed time of year gradually slip backwards through the zodiac, is believed by contemporary astronomers to generate a cycle lasting some 26,000 years.

As we saw in In Astrology, Think Spirals, Not Cycles, there are at least two primary systems for understanding how the quality of time changes over the course of this cycle. One is the astrological ages, favoured in the West, which divide this span of time into twelve sections, each allocated to one of the twelve signs of the zodiac. It’s this scheme that gives rise to the famed notion of the Age of Aquarius.

The other is the Indian yuga cycle—or, to be more precise, the mapping of the yugas onto the precessional cycle by Swami Sri Yukteswar Giri (1855-1936), an Indian mystic who lived at the turn of the 19th century. It’s this system that we’ll focus on in this article—and see how it holds an incredible amount of explanatory power.

Sri Yukteswar was the guru of Paramahansa Yogananda, best known as the author of the spellbinding book Autobiography of a Yogi and as the man who brought the powerful pranayama technique of Kriya Yoga to the West.

Bringing Vedic wisdom to America was one of the great projects of Yogananda’s lineage, and with that goal in mind, in 1894 Sri Yukteswar published a book that was to become highly influential in astrological circles: The Holy Science. In that text Sri Yukteswar sought to show the many parallels between Vedic and Christian spiritual teachings.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!NJZD!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd13b444b-a996-45b4-ac34-de0f3cf43a61_600x981.jpeg

But the book is best known for remarks Sri Yukteswar makes in its introduction, which opened up a new perspective on India’s ancient yuga cycle doctrine, which sees history unfolding in an unending sequence of four great ages, during which consciousness, and connection to the divine, shift over vast stretches of time.

The doctrine is laid out in various Vedic texts, including the great war epic, the Mahabharata, where it’s stated that the whole cycle, one Mahayuga, lasts 12,000 years. As we move from one yuga to the next, dharma, best translated as “virtue”, declines. The Satya Yuga, the “Golden Age”, when we’re in closest connection with the divine and dharma is at its highest, lasts 4,000 years; then comes the Treta Yuga, when dharma declines by one quarter, lasting 3,000 years; then the Dwapara Yuga, when dharma declines by another quarter, lasting 2,000 years; and finally the Kali Yuga, the lowest of the four ages, when dharma is at its lowest, lasting just 1,000 years. It’s generally supposed that after the Kali Yuga ends, there’s an instant return to the Satya Yuga, a quick shift from darkness to light—an usual idea when we consider that astronomical cycles never work like this.

Similar doctrines are found across the ancient world and to this day, including among the ancient Greeks, Persians, Maya and the Hopi of the Southwestern United States. The Greek poet Hesiod spoke of not four but five “ages of man”, which chart a similar process of descent, from the Golden Age of Cronus, to the Silver Age, the Bronze Age, the Heroic Age and down into the benighted Iron Age, when humans live a life of toil and suffering.

According to the yuga doctrine, each age is bookended by transitional periods called sandhi, which govern the shift from one period to the next. Each yuga begins with a “dawn”, lasting one-tenth of its length, and ends with a “twilight”, also lasting one-tenth of the major period. So, the Satya Yuga lasts 400 + 4,000 + 400 years = 4,800 years, the Treta Yuga lasts 300 + 3,000 + 300 = 3,600 years, the Dwapara Yuga lasts 200 + 2,000 + 200 = 2,400 years and the Kali Yuga lasts 100 + 1,000 + 100 years = 1,200 years.

But here’s the rub. The Mahabharata speaks of this cycle in terms of “years of the gods” or “divine” years, each of which is said to last 360 human years. This brings the length of the entire yuga cycle to 4,320,000 years. In other words, we’re dealing with a cycle that’s commonly believed to play out over vast stretches of cosmic time, far too long to be genuinely meaningful for mere humans. The Kali Yuga alone is said to last 432,000 years, and according to traditional belief, it began in 3102 BC after the end of the Mahabharata War. Thus, we may as well forget about ever experiencing anything other than materialism, illusion and ignorance for the foreseeable future.

Enter Sri Yukteswar. In his opening remarks to The Holy Science, he outlines what he believes to be the true formulation of the yuga cycle, claiming there had been mistakes in the transmission of the doctrine over the years, just as one might expect during the Kali Yuga, the age of illusion. Sri Yukteswar claimed the true cycle should be measured in human, not divine, years, and consists of both an ascending and descending phase, each lasting 12,000 years for a total of 24,000 years. This idea of a gently rising and falling cycle has much to recommend it, given that it more closely resembles cycles we see in nature, like that of the year and the waxing and waning synodic cycles of the planets.

Of course, 24,000 years is very close to the length of the precessional cycle. Indeed, in The Holy Science, Sri Yukteswar explicitly ties the yugas to the cycle of precession, perhaps one of his greatest contributions. But the reader will note a discrepancy: Sri Yukteswar’s 24,000-year cycle is around 2,000 years short of the current measured speed of precession of almost 26,000 years. Was Sri Yukteswar—and the sacred texts he was drawing from—simply wrong? Or does the speed of precession change over the course of the cycle, as Walter Cruttenden writes in his book on the subject, Lost Star of Myth and Time? We simply don’t know.

Here, some advice for the confused reader: I suggest taking Sri Yukteswar’s claims both seriously and lightly. People today, especially in the West, tend to demand certainty over the validity of ideas. We’re forever searching for the One, True System with all the answers. I’ve found that when it comes to spirituality, we’re better served by taking ideas more lightly, considering the strengths and weaknesses of different systems, and being comfortable with their contradictions. Look for confluence between different systems, rather than expecting one of them to explain everything.

/https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!ioXy!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffa338515-7937-42b2-a6c0-82ddc1589283_678x1000.jpeg

In their excellent book The Yugas, Joseph Selbie and David Steinmetz explore Sri Yukteswar’s ideas in depth, and I’ll be drawing on their work in this piece.

Sri Yukteswar specifies the years when each age in the current cycle began, as follows: The peak of the Satya Yuga, which Selbie and Steinmetz call the “Spiritual Age”, came in 11500 BC, when the ascending Satya Yuga gave way to the descending Satya Yuga. The descending Satya Yuga gave way to the descending Treta Yuga, the “Mental Age”, in 6700 BC. That was followed by the descending Dwapara Yuga, the “Energy Age”, in 3100 BC. And finally, in 700 BC, came the start of the descending Kali Yuga, the “Material Age”. The “bottom” of the current cycle came in 500 AD, when the descending Kali Yuga gave way to the ascending Kali Yuga, and the transition from there into the ascending Dwapara Yuga arrived in 1700. Yes, for Sri Yukteswar, the dark age is already over.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!wQp_!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7777c60f-5000-47d3-8e94-76ee3bf07aae_300x376.jpeg

Most usefully for an astrologer, Sri Yukteswar describes the quality of life during each of the ages. In the Kali Yuga, the Material Age, “the human intellect cannot comprehend anything beyond the gross material of this ever-changing creation, the external world.” In the Dwapara Yuga, the Energy Age, “the human intellect can then comprehend the fine matters or electricities and their attributes which are the creating principles of the external world.” In the Treta Yuga, the Mental Age, “the human intellect becomes able to comprehend the divine magnetism, the source of all electrical forces on which the creation depends for its existence.” And in the Satya Yuga, the “Spiritual Age”, “the mental virtue is then in its fourth stage and completes its full development; the human intellect can comprehend all, even God the Spirit beyond this visible world.”

The reader might wish to take some time to review the Chart of the Yugas diagram above. What may strike you is how the beginning of the descending Kali Yuga, in 700 BC, came just over a century before the triple conjunction of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto around 577 BC that we discussed in The Astonishing Astrology of the Axial Age. I believe this is no coincidence, and we’ll return to this later in the series.

Before we go on, I want to address a crucial question: Why should the reader take Sri Yukteswar’s framework of history seriously?

A great saint
I assume readers are already open to the idea that the cycles of the planets are synchronised with the rhythms of history. I doubt you’d be reading a newsletter called “World Astrology Report” otherwise. But there’s clearly a qualitative difference between planetary cycles and Sri Yukteswar’s claims about the architecture of time. After all, well-established principles of astronomy and mathematics mean we can be pretty sure there really was a triple conjunction of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto around the year 577 BC. When Sri Yukteswar tells us that “the descending Dwapara Yuga began in 3100 BC”—well, we just have to take his word for it, and I can understand why some readers might find this more difficult to swallow.

After all, all sorts of mystics, philosophers, renegade historians and, yes, certified cranks have proposed idiosyncratic metaphysical frameworks of cyclical history over the years, from the Renaissance abbot and occultist Trithemius, to traditionalist philosopher René Guénon, to Oswald Spengler in his The Decline of the West. Even an astrologically open-minded reader could be forgiven for giving a single long-dead mystic’s historical schema a good deal less credibility than the movements of the planets. So again, why trust Sri Yukteswar’s framework?

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!2LyV!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7580a9a6-a65e-4a7b-81a6-4c613fbfa0da_666x1000.jpeg

Well, if you’ve read his student Paramahansa Yogananda’s spellbinding Autobiography of a Yogi, you won’t need much convincing that Sri Yukteswar was a remarkable human being. Yogananda, an extraordinary figure himself, revered his guru, who initiated him into the technique of Kriya Yoga, a powerful pranayama technique said to rapidly accelerate spiritual development. Sri Yukteswar himself learned it from his own guru, the householder Lahiri Mahasaya, who is said to have been initiated into the technique in a cave in the Himalayas by the legendary immortal yogi and guru Mahavatar Babaji.

In Autobiography, Yogananda describes Sri Yukteswar performing many miracles. He heals a man using nothing but his intent. He controls the weather. He reads students’ minds. Perhaps most memorably, he appears to Yogananda long after death, describing to him the architecture of the spirit world.

It’s up to the reader to decide how much credibility to give these accounts. I sense nothing but truth and earnestness from Yogananda, and take him at his word. Sri Yukteswar wasn’t just “some guy”—he was a man of astonishing abilities, as well as an extremely accomplished astrologer. (Oh, and he’s one of the luminaries who appears on the front cover of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, in the very top-left of the image, right next to Aleister Crowley, in case a Beatles endorsement helps.)

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!s8CK!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa5ea042b-dfa1-4254-ae9b-c8ca471e9189_341x409.jpeg

Of course, I realise those arguments won’t convince everyone. Nor should they. What’s more important is the explanatory power of Sri Yukteswar’s yuga cycle. I’ve found that his framework explains certain facts about the broad sweep of history better than any other, including the remarkable advancement of certain ancient peoples—like the Egyptians.

The Great Pyramid and the Dwapara Yuga
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!BfmG!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fdf040f62-2271-4f30-8ec7-859ce91aca0c_2000x1125.jpeg

There’s a controversy raging today over a problem of history, clear to anyone with a reasonably open mind: the linear model of history, which sees knowledge, technological advancement and social justice progressively improving as time goes by, doesn’t match reality. A growing number of renegade researchers like Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval and John Anthony West have engaged in deep studies of ancient cultures without feeling bound to the conclusions considered “acceptable” by mainstream academia. They’ve judged that ancient people were far more advanced than we’re generally led to believe, and knew many things we’ve forgotten today. With help from the modern podcast circuit, their arguments are finding a wide audience today, and I think that’s simply because the mainstream narrative stands on very shaky ground.

Foremost among the many “inconvenient” truths of history is the existence of a singular structure: the Great Pyramid of Giza, conventionally estimated to have been constructed around 2500 BC. The first mystery we have to deal with when it comes to the Great Pyramid is how it was built at all. It’s composed of more than 2.3 million limestone and granite blocks. Some weigh as much of 100,000 pounds and were transported to the site from as far away as 500 miles.

The Great Pyramid was also constructed with incredible precision. Its base deviates from being perfectly level around its entire circumference by less than 7/8ths of an inch. Selbie and Steinmetz quote Christopher Dunn, an engineer and author of The Giza Power Plant: “The bald fact is that the Great Pyramid — by any standard old or new — is the largest and most accurately constructed building in the world.” As more and more people are screaming from the rooftops these days, this structure could not have been built by so-called “primitive” people.

What’s more, Dunn believes the pyramid had a very specific purpose. He argues that its dimensions and weight were perfectly calibrated to resonate with the seismic pulse of the Earth, which is generated by tiny shifts in its crust. Dunn argues that using the piezoelectric properties of quartz, the Great Pyramid could literally generate electricity. In other words, it was a kind of power plant. Of course, Dunn’s is just one of many wild theories about the true purpose of this remarkable structure. But many of them, perhaps most of them, hold that the Great Pyramid harnessed principles of frequency and resonance in some way we have yet to fully understand.

This idea becomes particularly interesting in light of Sri Yukteswar’s timeline of the yugas. For him, the Dwapara Yuga began in 3100 BC with a 200-year “dawn”, which ended in 2900 BC, not long before the Great Pyramid was built. Again, the essence of the Dwapara Yuga, the Energy Age, is that we become able to comprehend “the fine matters or electricities and their attributes which are the creating principles of the external world.”

What’s more, we need an explanation for the fact that over time, useful and potentially empowering knowledge was lost. Most scholars believe the Great Pyramid was constructed during the reign of the Pharaoh Khufu, in around 2580 to 2560 BC. Yet it’s inarguably the most advanced structure built over the entire span of Egyptian civilisation. Later pyramids stand today in ruins, while the Great Pyramid maintains its form.

In Sri Yukteswar’s timeline, the construction of the pyramid would have come close to the start of the Energy Age, after descent from a higher age, the Treta Yuga or “Mental Age”. While the linear model of progressive history is troubled by the existence of the Great Pyramid, Sri Yukteswar’s model comes into its own. Such a feat was possible because, well, we were smarter back then. What’s more, we had abilities we eventually lost—magical abilities.

Magic in the Dwapara Yuga
Selbie and Steinmetz write that the Dwapara Yuga is characterised by three things: awakened intellect, self-interest, and energy awareness. Where Treta Yuga people had direct perception of how thoughts create reality, Dwapara Yuga people perceived and manipulated energy, a step down in potency.

Nothing as imposing or impressive as the Great Pyramid had been constructed in earlier times, not because human beings hadn’t been able to, but because they hadn’t needed to. Selbie and Steinmetz say this: “If the ancient Egyptians understood the laws of energy yet did not have an established tradition of mechanical technology (not needed in Treta Yuga), harnessing the earth’s seismic power in this profoundly simple and ecologically harmonious manner may well have been the natural result.”

The transition into Dwapara Yuga, from 3400 to 2900 BC, also saw the emergence of the first writing system, in the form of Sumerian cuneiform, which has been dated to about 3200 BC. Why might a technology like writing emerge at the transition between the Mental Age and the Energy Age? Well, bear in mind that for Sri Yukteswar, this transition involved a degradation of our mental abilities. Writing things down is what you resort to when memory fails you.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!bJah!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F214b7f1c-5602-41a9-bd15-0e806020d4d9_1600x1135.jpeg

During the same period, we also find evidence of the first large cities. This, together with the emergence of writing, has led mainstream scholars to conclude that “civilisation” began in the 4th millennium BC, around the time of the transition into the Energy Age.

But again, is the building of cities really a sign of advancement? Selbie and Steinmetz argue that one of the developments that characterise the Dwapara Yuga is rising self-interest. Self-interest expresses itself in a particular human activity: commerce. That’s what cities are for—they’re centres of trade.

Intriguingly, according to Sri Yukteswar the transition from ascending Kali Yuga into our current age, the ascending Dwapara Yuga, came between 1600 and 1900. We’d expect to see a rise in self-interest over that time—check—which would express itself in growth in the activity of trade and urbanisation—check. Here’s a chart showing the growth of the urban population over recent centuries:

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!u696!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2d31a695-b1a1-4d2e-87b5-ac0670d53336_2560x1183.jpeg

Sri Yukteswar’s model of time, and only his, elegantly explains why urbanisation first appears in the 4th millennium BC—and is soaring again now.

The pursuit of self-interest aside, at the essence of the Dwapara Yuga is the awareness of energy. According to Sri Yukteswar, the full transition into the Energy Age ended in 1900. At that time, one of the world’s most famous people was the very master of electricity himself, the genius inventor Nikola Tesla. Consider what are probably his best-known words: “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” Such figures tend to be exquisitely in touch with the times.

Traditional practices that manipulate energy, like acupuncture and qigong, date to the descending Dwapara Yuga. Interesting, then, that in our own ascending Dwapara Yuga, they’re experiencing a revival today—as is another facet of life in Dwapara Yuga: the practice of magic.

The ancient Egyptians are the very archetype of the magical civilisation. The occult and magical practices in huge swatches of the modern world can be traced back to them. Indeed, through the Hermetica, Egyptian magic drove a transformation of European society in the early modern era, ultimately leading to the birth of modern science. Later in the series, we’ll see how this happened when, and only when, the astrological time was right.

You might well ask—if the Dwapara Yuga is characterised by the widespread practice of magic, why isn’t magic more popular in our own ascending Energy Age?

I’d suggest thinking this question through. The famous magician Dion Fortune defined magic as “the art and science of causing change in consciousness in accordance with will”. Now consider the sheer ubiquity today of advertising and corporate logos. Then ask: what is advertising, but a spell that attempts to change the consciousness of the target, in accordance with the will of the advertiser? What is a logo, but an intentionally charged sigil?

We live in a deeply magical age. That has only grown more true since the Dwapara Yuga began in 1900. Today, we’re seen less and less as objects to be compelled into action by force, more as energetic forces to be cajoled, deceived and manipulated. Yes, this is progress.

The core claim to reckon with in Sri Yukteswar’s framework is that we’ve already left the Kali Yuga behind. By his reckoning, this is not the worst of times. How do you feel about that?

In the next piece, we’ll think more about the Kali Yuga, from 700 BC to 1700 AD, a period that saw the birth of two major faiths, Christianity and Islam, best described as “salvation religions”. They oriented followers away from this world, and towards the next one, demanding sacrifice, self-denial and martyrdom. Astrologers might sense here the flavour of the zodiacal sign of Pisces, and they’d be right. In the next piece, we’ll take this thread further, and explore how the Kali Yuga and the Age of Pisces were one and the same. "

shaberon
9th December 2025, 07:32
embedded in the mythical traditions of ancient people across the world: the precession of the equinoxes.

The doctrine of the Yugas
The precession of the equinoxes, whereby the stars rising at a fixed time of year gradually slip backwards through the zodiac, is believed by contemporary astronomers to generate a cycle lasting some 26,000 years.

As we saw in In Astrology, Think Spirals, Not Cycles, there are at least two primary systems for understanding how the quality of time changes over the course of this cycle. One is the astrological ages, favoured in the West, which divide this span of time into twelve sections, each allocated to one of the twelve signs of the zodiac. It’s this scheme that gives rise to the famed notion of the Age of Aquarius.

The other is the Indian yuga cycle—or, to be more precise, the mapping of the yugas onto the precessional cycle by Swami Sri Yukteswar Giri (1855-1936), an Indian mystic who lived at the turn of the 19th century. It’s this system that we’ll focus on in this article—and see how it holds an incredible amount of explanatory power.




I don't hold this doctrine for some precise reasons.


Math


This was a big part of the commodities market considering India imports almost nothing.


The stamp of the Puranic Yugas is the Tetraktys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetractys):

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Tetractys.svg/500px-Tetractys.svg.png


Planetary motion and music of the Spheres



At the time, Indian calculations were more like an algorithm, whereas the Greeks developed Spherical Trigonometry. That is how you calculate the Great Year, which was derived "incidentally" by Hipparchus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipparchus) around 150 B. C. E..

The Indians said the Romakas are wrong because the equinox will bounce back where it used to be. They believed it was oscillating. The term "Yuga" had a different meaning as found in the oldest strata of the Puranas:



A yugam of five years, commencing with śravaṇa and ending with dhaniṣṭhā nakṣatra—the five years are respectively Agni, Sūrya, Soma, Vāyu and Rudra; consists of Samvatsara, Parivatsara, Idvatsara, Anuvatsara and Vatsara; revolves like the wheel owing to the movement of the Sun.2

2) Brahmāṇḍa-purāṇa II. 13. 115, 147; 21. 131; 24. 57 and 144; 28. 22; Vāyu-purāṇa 31. 28, 49; 32. 57-65; 50. 182; 53. 116; 56. 21; Viṣṇu-purāṇa II. 8. 72.


That is because the science of Time Keeping, Vedanga Jyotish, actually was the secret of the Vedic Rishis. But it's about Agni and their view on rain and the seasons and so forth, and the Yuga was five years.

This is ancient enough to have internal markers whose youngest possible occurrences would be about 1,350 B. C. E. and 2,000 B. C. E. that are certainly based on observational astronomy using the equinox itself.

As time went by, they didn't update it for over a thousand years until matching the "Point of Aries" system from Greece around the year 200. Eventually you are forced to update because anyone can see it has moved, and the astrological Siddhanta texts are from around 500 and there are still arguments about whether it is going in a circle. That is the era most of the Puranas appeared. In conclusion, I find this is like taking Greek math and amplifying it to say "we are these thousands and millions of years old".

The Puranas and Epics are probably low in objectivity.

I remain agnostic as to whether there are such "Astrological Ages" that heavily condition major chains of events, but, I can see how the entities are natural timers and that this does relate to what we experience at present from moment to moment.

I don't think we are in the Kali Yuga, I do think we are in Music of the Spheres.

If something feels off, if it doesn't sound right, then, there's a reason that, for example, Mercury is wreaking havoc with me today, but it's something I said, or did, or forgot, and I just take it on myself as responsibility to straighten it out, rather than granting Mercury some excuse to have an indomitable era of evil.

I hope that makes sense. India has not imported a lot of material, but it has taken on a lot of Greek and Babylonian intellect such as the Flood in Matsya Purana. Events that have happened don't necessarily need a portent or explanation, whereas the assertion of late Babylonian astrology is more like everything has to have one. This influence certainly affected India, where, prior, it is absent, and the Vedas certainly have nothing like this.

onawah
9th December 2025, 08:19
I believe this is just the sort of subject you are usually very focused on Shaberon, and go into great detail about, which you are welcome to do if you care to.
...But if that is the case, and if you would like to generate some scholarly discussion, then it might be better if you start your own thread.
Hindu cosmology is not a subject I am well versed on, but I was always interested in Yoganana and his guru Sri Yukteswar, and their influence on the West.
I think that it may be of interest to others here as well to see World Astrology's perspectives on Yukteswar's work, and on the subject of the Yugas in general, even if they don't align with your own.
I hope you will allow space for that to occur without too much distraction on this thread. Thanks.:star:



I don't hold this doctrine for some precise reasons.

happyuk
9th December 2025, 08:36
The traditional Hindu view says we are in Kali Yuga (The Material Age), which lasts for lasts 432,000 years and we are only we are only ~5,000 years into it.

A dark prospect! and fortunately one which Sri Yukteswar proves is not correct.

In his book, Sri Yukteswar explains how ancient texts were misinterpreted and that the Yugas are much shorter than commonly believed:

Yuga Duration (years)

Satya Yuga - 4800
Treta Yuga - 3600
Dvapara Yuga - 2400
Kali Yuga - 1200


He also said each Yuga has an ascending and descending half, creating a 24,000-year cycle, tied to the sun’s motion around a companion star (a binary system hypothesis).

His key assertion is that we are currently in the Ascending Dvapara Yuga and the timeline he provided are as follows:

Descending Kali Yuga ended: A.D. 499
Ascending Kali Yuga lasted: A.D. 499 – 1699
Ascending Dvapara Yuga started: A.D. 1700
Entering Dvapara Yuga proper: A.D. 1900

Sri Yukteswar also gives a specific, compact explanation of how Kali Yuga hit its lowest point around A.D. 500, which he describes as a time of maximum darkness, ignorance, strife, and fixation on materialism. The human mind’s ability to perceive higher realities also diminishes during descending Kali Yuga and by its lowest point, this ability is almost completely gone. History indeed bears this out, with fall of the Western Roman Empire (A.D. 476), post-Roman fragmentation, massive population movements (Huns, Goths, Vandals), turmoil in India after the Gupta decline and the decline of classical learning across Eurasia.

In his book he says that by A.D. 499:


The intellectual power of man was so diminished that he could not comprehend anything beyond the gross material world.

This in turn leads to: dogmatism, ritualism replacing genuine understanding, superstition dominating religion, loss of scientific knowledge, decline of arts and philosophy etc.

He then gives a very specific sequence of dates showing how humanity gradually improved after the lowest point of Kali Yuga in A.D. 499, He says noticeable improvements begin in: science, communication, mobility across continents, greater political cooperation, compared with the earlier chaos of Kali Yuga

Historically, this also fits:


England and Scotland joined together and became a powerful nation.
Napoleon gave the Code Napoleon, a rational system of law.
Newton’s laws of gravitation and laws of motion became known.
People able to communicate instantly across the globe using electricity - whole continents become criss-crossed with railroads and telegraph lines.


We are in the ascending Dvāpara Yuga (Age of Energy) now (since A.D. 1700), and Yukteswar says its full effects continue for 2,400 years until AD 4100.

During this age: humans will better understand energy as the basis of matter, rapid global communication and fast travel, major advances in science, technology, electricity, and magnetism. More rational politics and less superstition. Growing awareness of life-force (prāṇa).

During the ascending Tretā Yuga (Age of Mind) — telepathy, mental sciences, harmony, direct understanding of subtle mental laws; lasts between A.D. 4100 to A.D. 7700

During the ascending Satya Yuga (Age of Spirit), (A.D. 7700 to A.D. 12,500) - — direct perception of Spirit, intuitive wisdom, perfect harmony, mastery of mind/energy/matter.

onawah
9th December 2025, 09:05
What interests me greatly is how theories about the Yugas match up with what we know now about the 12,000 year solar cycles, which have regularly created an incredibly challenging global "restart" unmatched even by any astrological progression into a new stage of development.
Although it does appear that, due to the discovery of ancient structures and underground cities, there must have been times when those restarts were anticipated in sufficient time to create safe havens from the hazards of pole reversal and geomagnetic excursion.
Though precisely how creating those structures was accomplished in some cases is as mysterious as the puzzle concerning how the Great Pyramid was built... :nerd:

Ernie Nemeth
9th December 2025, 22:36
What interests me greatly is how theories about the Yugas match up with what we know now about the 12,000 year solar cycles, which have regularly created an incredibly challenging global "restart" unmatched even by any astrological progression into a new stage of development.
Although it does appear that, due to the discovery of ancient structures and underground cities, there must have been times when those restarts were anticipated in sufficient time to create safe havens from the hazards of pole reversal and geomagnetic excursion.
Though precisely how creating those structures was accomplished in some cases is as mysterious as the puzzle concerning how the Great Pyramid was built... :nerd:


That is an area of great interest to me.

onawah
10th January 2026, 08:08
Astrology Needs Answers To Big-Cycle Questions
The Hermetic Age #009: Uniting yugas, astrological ages and cultural epochs
Dan/ World Astrology Report
Jan 10, 2026
https://substack.com/home/post/p-184101446

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Dy3r!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff6e0c5c8-03b2-45a1-81a9-68807f56860c_1024x1024.webp

"You could make the argument that improving our understanding of long cycles, especially the precessional cycle, is the most urgent task in mundane astrology today. As I pointed out in In Astrology, Think Spirals, Not Cycles, every cycle is embedded within a still-greater one. We run into trouble with our prognostications when we miss the wider context.

An extreme example will illustrate the point: this year’s much-discussed conjunction of Saturn and Neptune at 0° Aries seems like the most significant thing in the sky right now. But if we’ve reached a point in the precessional cycle that reliably brings civilisation-ending cataclysms, as Yuga Shift author Bibhu Dev Misra argues, it hardly matters.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Olj0!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe25a23a7-2276-48fb-ab4b-f89e2f2bec41_328x500.jpeg

Unfortunately, our collective knowledge of how times change over the course of the 24-26,000-year precessional cycle leaves much to be desired. It’s fragmentary, contradictory and contested. This applies to both primary systems for carving up the cycle: the Indian yugas and the astrological ages.

In The Yugas: How An Ancient Doctrine Of Cyclical Time Solves The Mystery Of The Great Pyramid, we encountered Sri Yukteswar Giri’s vision of the yugas, which holds that the Kali Yuga ended in the year 1700. Vedic traditionalists continue to maintain that the Kali Yuga began in 3102 BC and will last 432,000 years. For them, Sri Yukteswar’s ideas are merely those of one man who mistakenly thought he knew better than millennia of Hindu tradition.

More recently, another vision of the yuga cycle has emerged through the work of Bibhu Dev Misra, author of the fascinating Yuga Shift, which has had a huge impact on spiritual and New Age circles in recent years. Many of the astrologers and mystics appearing on YouTube’s biggest spirituality podcasts today take their cues from Misra’s work, and particularly his conclusion that the Kali Yuga ended on the spring equinox of 2025.

Ominously, depending on your perspective, Misra believes that that milestone has initiated a long period of ekpyrosis, cleansing by fire, which will last some 1,200 years before the next age, the Dwapara Yuga, begins. The last such cataclysm was the Younger Dryas period, which began with devastating global floods around 12,900 BC. Many esoterically minded researchers believe the Younger Dryas saw the destruction of Atlantis, leading to the proliferation of flood myths told by ancient peoples the world over. Misra believes that that event was caused by a series of comet impacts—and that in the coming years, we may see a fresh round of them. For those of us yet to reach a level of spiritual advancement that allows us to face such prospects with total equanimity, Sri Yukteswar’s timeline holds more appeal.

Who’s right? Bibhu Dev Misra, the dedicated modern researcher, or Sri Yukteswar, the great saint?

I think we’re best served by taking a leaf out of science’s book and keeping both possibilities in mind as hypotheses. We’re still early in the process of reconstructing our understanding of shifting time and consciousness, particularly over long periods of time. There should be competing theories out there. I propose respectfully holding these ideas in mind and simply watching how history unfolds. If Misra’s theory about ekpyrosis is correct, it should become clear quite soon—cleansing waves of fire, whether literal or not, are rather hard to miss.

The Age of Aquarius
When it comes to the astrological ages, we face a similar problem. And we can summarise the debate in a single question: has the Age of Aquarius begun yet?

Most astrologers believe the 12 astrological ages each last roughly 2,150 years, or one-twelfth of 26,000 years. Even this idea is contested, since some hold that the length of the ages should be proportional to the sizes of the actual constellations of the zodiac, which vary considerably.

Leaving that issue aside, some astrologers fix the beginning of the Age of Pisces to the coming of Christ, and so believe the Age of Aquarius is due in about 150 years. Others base their calculations on the offset between the tropical and sidereal zodiacs. With the Aries point (the position of the Sun at the Spring Equinox) currently situated at roughly 6° Pisces in most sidereal ayanamshas (the offset with the tropical zodiac), we have around one-fifth of an astrological age to go before the Age of Aquarius begins, perhaps around 2500.

I’ve gained a great deal of insight from the work of astrologers who suspect the Age of Aquarius is yet to begin, most notably Ray Grasse and his excellent book Signs of the Times, which explores the transition from the Age of Pisces to the Age of Aquarius. (And if you’re not subscribed to his Substack, well, you’re missing out…)

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Qm_M!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd4091ffe-affd-4094-9043-7f63102fdb87_334x500.jpeg

Grasse argues that even if the Aquarian Age hasn’t officially started yet, its looming arrival is already influencing us. Consider, for example, the relatively recent birth and world domination of the United States, a country with the words Novus Ordo Seclorum, “new order of the ages”, on its Great Seal, as Aquarian a phrase as you could imagine. Grasse points to America’s democracy, capitalistic orientation and technological drive as Aquarian Age manifestations. So, too, is the country’s most characteristic art form: jazz music, with its Aquarian tension between the coherence of the group and individual expression.

For Grasse, the spiritual zeitgeist is defined by a melding of the competing influences of Pisces and Aquarius—one fading, one struggling to be born. Consider American politics, and the unending battle between the Christian right (Pisces) and liberal left (Aquarius).

Still, the astrologer whose timeline of astrological ages I find most compelling is Australia’s Terry MacKinnell, who has made the study of the ages his life’s work. I’ve written about MacKinnell’s research on Substack before, in The Age of Aquarius *is* modernity. MacKinnell believes that most timelines of the astrological ages are actually around half an astrological age out, and that the Age of Aquarius already began some 600 years ago—in 1433, to be precise. And he has compelling arguments for why this is the case.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!JmGi!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F68ddb732-6185-4aa9-ad37-72cf709b9a76_278x400.jpeg

Most astrologers base their understanding of when an astrological age begins on the position in the zodiac of the Sun at the Spring Equinox. For MacKinnell, this is a mistake, for a simple reason: stars in a part of the sky hosting the Sun cannot be seen. What was most important to ancient people was the visible sky, not the abstractions that can be seen on charts. They were particularly interested in times when stars made their first visible appearance of the year, either just before dawn, or just after sundown. Astrologers call the moment a planet or star first emerges from the Sun’s rays and becomes visible to the naked eye just before dawn its heliacal rising. Famously, the Egyptians anchored the start of their year to the heliacal rise of Sirius, which coincided with the flooding of the Nile. As we’ll see later, their entire calendar was based on the heliacal rising of the stars of the zodiac.

Thus, for MacKinnell, an astrological age can be said to have begun when the constellation that bears its name first becomes visible at dawn on the Spring Equinox. If MacKinnell is right, this shifts any timeline for the astrological ages backwards by around half an astrological age, or 1,075 years. Thus, the Age of Aquarius actually began when the Aries point reached about 15° of the sidereal constellation of Pisces, meaning we’re already deep into the Aquarian Age. The image below, take from Stellarium, shows the Sun at the Spring Equinox in 2026, shortly after dawn. Note how the Sun is in Pisces, but Aquarius will be the last constellation to rise from the horizon before the Sun’s light dissolves the night.

MacKinnell arrived at his precise timeline for the ages through a process of astrological reverse engineering, which astrologers call rectification. Usually, rectification is performed for a client who doesn’t know their precise time of birth. The astrologer uses the known timing of events in their life to establish the correct time. MacKinnell performed a similar process but with history itself as the subject, establishing very precise years for the beginning of each age. His timeline of the ages looks like this:

Age of Gemini: 7158 - 5010 BC

Age of Taurus: 5010 - 2862 BC

Age of Aries: 2862 - 715 BC

Age of Pisces: 715 BC - 1433 AD

Age of Aquarius: 1433 AD - 3581 AD

Age of Capricorn: 3581 AD - 5728 AD

Age of Sagittarius: 5728 AD - 7876 AD

The idea that the Aquarian Age began in the 15th century may at first be confounding, especially if you envision it as some kind of New Age or futuristic utopia. But consider this: knowledge and technology have advanced precipitously since the 15th century, which it’s fair to say was a watershed century. Around 1450 Johannes Gutenberg invented his printing press, arguably launching the first phase of the “information age” we still live in today. Downstream of that invention were Copernicus’s development of the heliocentric theory, then the emergence of the scientific method, the Enlightenment revolutions of the 18th century and the emergence of the capitalistic, hyper-informational globalised world we live in today.

Crucially, historians claim the “early modern” era began in the 15th century. If the astrological ages truly do something then their signature should be detectable in the historical record by people who aren’t looking for them. Ask 100 astrologers which of the 12 zodiac signs is the most “modern”. I’d wager most would point to Aquarius.

From here I’m going to assume Terry MacKinnell’s timeline for the astrological ages is roughly correct. This series will focus primarily on the Pluto-Neptune synodic cycle, but his timeline of the astrological ages will give us more much-needed context and understanding.

Intriguingly, MacKinnell’s timeline of epochs closely matches that of a very different figure: the influential Austrian mystic Rudolf Steiner, founder of the Anthroposophical movement.

The Age of Aries and ancient Egypt

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!xtZN!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F938a3165-dc9e-4001-a4c4-7edd74ee2b3a_2400x1600.jpeg

Given their anchoring to the stars, the astrological ages speak primarily to changes in humanity’s conception of the divine. What if certain civilisations serve as the principle vehicle for the spiritual impulses carried by each age?

Steiner divided the history of humanity into seven long epochs marking successive phases in the development of consciousness. The fourth of them was what he called the “Atlantean” epoch, followed by the current epoch, which he called “post-Atlantean”. In turn, he divided this epoch into seven shorter “cultural epochs”, sometimes called “post-Atlantean epochs”, in which a particular culture served as primary carrier of the impulse of the age:

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!6fcD!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9f6426f7-adcd-4f35-be63-8efc89c5fd54_1158x1090.png

Steiner’s timeline of the entire Post-Atlantean Epoch was as follows:

Ancient Indian culture (7227 - 5067 BC)

Ancient Persian culture (5067 - 2907 BC)

Egyptian-Chaldean culture (2907 - 747 BC)

Greco-Latin culture (747 BC - 1413 AD).

Anglo-German culture (1413 - 3573 AD, our present epoch)

Slavic culture (3573 - 5733 AD)

American culture (5733 - 7893 AD)

To be clear, I don’t think Steiner’s claim is that these cultures are somehow better than their contemporaries, merely that they serve as the carrier of an important impulse at that time, which inevitably diffuses out to other world cultures. As with the ideas of Sri Yukteswar, Bibhu Dev Misra and Terry MacKinnell, I consider Steiner’s esoteric timeline to be another hypothesis worth holding in mind, nothing more or less.

Needless to say, some readers will naturally balk at this rendering of history. In these egalitarian-leaning times, when many people like to think of all cultures—and the lives of those partaking of them—as equally important, such ideas raise eyebrows. To be clear, I don’t consider Steiner a source to read uncritically. He, like anyone else, could be wrong, and almost certainly was on many questions. And I wouldn’t personally go into bat for the idea that “Anglo-German culture”, and the United States, which is in important ways downstream of it, has been the primary vehicle for the spiritual development of our age since the 15th century, and will be until 3573. But I can’t be certain that’s wrong, either. For better or worse, Anglo-German culture has undoubtedly been unusually influential on the world since the 15th century, and could well remain so. I think we assume reality is politically correct at our peril.

Where I think this gets truly interesting is when we see how close Steiner’s timeline is to MacKinnell’s, as shown in the table below:

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LjaN!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb8c5fecf-7a6c-46b7-b171-cf92a4b12780_1248x614.png

MacKinnell is aware of these correspondences, making note of them in his book The Dawning. In a recent interview for my YouTube channel, MacKinnell told me that his Age of Aries, from 2862 BC to 715 BC, lines up rather well with the span of the Egyptian civilisation, often dated from roughly 3000 BC to 1000 BC. Steiner’s timeline says the same thing, associating that period with “Egyptian-Chaldean” culture.

Interestingly, Steiner also associated his cultural epochs with the astrological ages, though his timeline is one entire sign out from MacKinnell’s. Thus, MacKinnell’s Age of Pisces is Steiner’s Age of Aries, and MacKinnell’s Aquarian Age is Steiner’s Age of Pisces, and so on. There’s a good explanation for why this actually makes sense, which we’ll get to a little later.

One of MacKinnell’s most interesting innovations in thinking about the astrological ages is his division of them into shorter periods using traditional divisions of the zodiac signs, including the dodecatemoria (12th parts). This led him to develop the notion that each astrological age can be divided into 12 “sub-ages”, each allocated to one of the signs and lasting around 178 years. He even divides these ages further, into 15-year “micro ages”. Indeed, it’s using these divisions that MacKinnell was able to arrive at his very precise dating of the astrological ages.

He also makes great use of the 36 decans, the division of each of the zodiac signs into three 10° sections. The decans were an innovation of the ancient Egyptians, who used them for time keeping. For example, their year was divided into 36 ten-day weeks, each associated with a decan, according to the star making its heliacal rise at the time. Each of the decans was associated with a different god-form, whose influence rose as his or her decan was activated. Later, in the Hellenistic phase of Egyptian history, the decans were decoupled from the stars and tethered to the 12-sign zodiac. Thus, each of the signs can be divided into three decans, turning each into a three-act story.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LU4l!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3a02a5b1-cba8-414a-b4a6-2cb66971de28_735x729.jpeg

MacKinnell emphasises that, as with the signs, the astrological ages can and should be divided into three shorter periods lasting one-third of 2,150 years each, each assigned to the three signs of the same element. He calls these “Age-Decans”. For example, we’re currently living through the Libra Age-Decan of the Aquarian Age, one reason for the relative comfort of modern times and the rise of women. In 2149, the Gemini Age-Decan of the Age of Aquarius will begin, and then the Aquarian Age-Decan in 2865.

If we divide MacKinnell’s Age of Aries into three, we get the Sagittarius Age-Decan (2862 - 2117 BC), the Leo Age-Decan (2117 - 1431 BC) and the Aries Age-Decan (1431 - 715 BC). Interestingly, they coincide rather well with the three kingdoms of ancient Egypt. The Old Kingdom (2700 - 2200 BC) coincides with the Sagittarius Age-Decan; the Middle Kingdom (2040 - 1782 BC) coincides with the Leo Age-Decan; and the New Kingdom (1570 - 1069 BC) coincides with the Aries Age-Decan. Ancient Egypt was exquisitely well connected to spiritual and magical undercurrents. It makes sense that such a civilisation would change form as the prevailing celestial influences shifted.

When we consider the Age of Pisces, which MacKinnell dates from 715 BC to 1433 AD, we see something similar. His Piscean Age coincides remarkably well with the lifespan of the Roman civilisation.

The Roman empire

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!skKx!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbabee659-cd08-4d5f-af2a-baa4428fdbf6_7489x4876.jpeg

Rome was traditionally said to have been founded in 753 BC by Romulus, the son of the war god Mars and the Vestal virgin Rhea Silvia. This would have come at the very end of the Age of Aries, a time when, for MacKinnell, the influence of that sign, which is ruled by Mars, had reached its maximum.

In 330 AD, almost exactly half way through the Age of Pisces, the Emperor Constantine established Constantinople as his new capital of the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire became divided into Western and Eastern halves. Consider here the symbolism of Pisces: two fishes, linked by a cord.

It’s notoriously difficult to settle on a single date for the fall of the Western Roman Empire, but the years 410, when Rome was sacked by the Visigoths, and 476, when the last Roman Emperor was deposed by the barbarian king Odoacer, are often cited. Either way, this places the fall at roughly half way through the Age of Pisces.

The Eastern Roman Empire remained powerful for more than a millennium, eventually becoming known as the Byzantine Empire. It met its end with the fall of Constantinople on May the 25th, 1453, when the city was conquered by the forces of the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II. As we’ll see later in The Hermetic Age, this geopolitical development would have massive spiritual consequences, and led, in a roundabout way, to the emergence of the modern world.

Thus, the full span of the Roman Empire arguably takes us from 753 BC to 1453 AD, a period of 2,100 years, extremely close to the span of an astrological age. I consider this to be another piece of evidence that suggests MacKinnell’s astrological ages timeline is roughly correct. What’s more, Steiner linked this very period with “Greco-Latin” culture.

The Abrahamic religions and the Age of Pisces
MacKinnell’s timeline also tells an interesting spiritual story, for Rome had a critical role to play in the history of the Abrahamic faiths, especially that of Christianity. Christ’s disciples were fishermen, while Christ himself called himself a “fisher of men”. Early Christians identified themselves with the symbol of the fish. Still, the image of Pisces is two fishes joined by a thread. The Age of Pisces saw the emergence of what are today, by some distance, the two biggest religions in the world: Christianity and Islam, neither of which existed when the Age of Pisces began.

Of course, Christianity and Islam are, along with Judaism, members of a triumvirate of Abrahamic religions. And when we divide the Age of Pisces into three periods allocated to each of the sign’s three decans, we see more confirmation of the power of MacKinnell’s timeline. Judaism was present in nascent form at the beginning of the Age of Pisces in 715 BC, the time of the Cancer Age-Decan. Christianity was born soon after the second decanic period of the Age of Pisces began, the Scorpio Age-Decan, around 0 AD. And the third, Islam, emerged a little before the beginning of the third decanic period, the Pisces Age-Decan, around 700 AD.

Thus, as with the Age of Aries and Egypt, MacKinnell’s Piscean Age gives us a three-act story of the birth of the world’s three great monotheistic faiths. Rather than seeing emergent Christianity as marking the beginning of the Piscean Age, as many astrologers do, MacKinnell’s timeline acknowledges its status as a child of Judaism, and marks Islam as downstream of the first two Abrahamic faiths.

But why should the Age of Pisces give birth to faiths such as these? Well, it seems to me that there’s something intrinsic to the sign of Pisces that relates to the Abrahamic religions. All of them are monotheistic, seeing God as alone and transcendent. None of them allow for reincarnation, at least in their exoteric forms.

It’s Pisces’s status as the last of the twelve signs of the zodiac that is, perhaps, most telling here. The first sign, Aries, given to Mars, begins with the primal act of severance from our mother and entry into the world. Oceanic Pisces, on the other hand, is the sign of the return to the spiritual world. Pisces has one foot in the earthly realm and one in the next. It lives in expectation of the end of this life. Thus, it’s the sign of the mystic and his wayward cousin, the drunk, both of whom seek that return through the dissolution of the self. And it’s the sign of martyrs, those who sacrifice their lives for their faith. Both Christianity and Islam are religions that explicitly prize martyrdom and self-sacrifice.

The reader might wonder: if this really is the Age of Aquarius and the Age of Pisces is long gone, then why do those same faiths remain so influential today? MacKinnell has an interesting answer. He believes that at the start of an astrological age, the spiritual influence of the governing sign is at its lowest. Over the course of the age, its influence streams into the world, building and building until it reaches a maximum at the end of the age.

What’s more, a sign’s influence doesn’t abruptly end at the shift to the next age. Instead, it starts the next age with tremendous power and influence, which flows into the new age and gradually fades as the next sign takes over. MacKinnell calls this an “overflow”. It’s only around halfway through an age that the governing sign begins to dominate the previous one.

With this in mind, MacKinnell gives each astrological age a double-barreled name. We live today in the Pisces-Aquarius Age, which captures the idea that Pisces is still the senior partner, and the influence of the Aquarian impulse is actually less pronounced, but growing. Many people, including Friedrich Nietzsche, have described modern left-liberalism as being fundamentally Christian in its assumptions—think of the concern for poor and outcastes of society—albeit generally stripped of the “God” part. This idea explains why.

The Pisces overflow also explains why Steiner’s timeline of the astrological ages is one sign out from MacKinnell’s. Steiner names each age for the sign that’s most influential at its beginning. Thus, MacKinnell’s Age of Pisces-Aquarius is Steiner’s Age of Pisces, the age we continue to live in today. Perhaps, as a clairvoyant, Steiner named his ages for the influence he perceived to be strongest when each age began.

MacKinnell believes Aquarius will only become the dominant influence halfway through the Age of Aquarius, in the year 2507 AD. Aquarian influence will be at its strongest at the dawn of the Age of Capricorn, in 3581 AD. Over the centuries, we might expect the Abrahamic faiths to gradually lose influence, eventually being superseded by new spiritual forces of an Aquarian nature.

I hope you will agree that MacKinnell’s timeline of the ages compelling. What’s interesting, too, is the coincidence between his Age of Pisces, from 715 BC to 1433 AD, and Sri Yukteswar’s Kali Yuga, from 700 BC to 1700 AD. How can we reconcile these ideas?

Well, the Kali Yuga is said to be the age of ignorance, a time when humanity is furthest from the divine and can perceive nothing but gross matter. What we saw, as the Kali Yuga took hold, was the systematic destruction of ancient wisdom. Often this was carried out by Christians who were bearing the impulse of the Piscean Age—and so, driven to expunge knowledge redolent of the fading Age of Aries. And we saw something else: the growing silence of the gods.

We’ll consider this phenomenon in the next installment of The Hermetic Age."

onawah
10th January 2026, 23:53
Chat with astrologer Dan Waites

I've just chatted with the astrologer Dan Waites of World Astrology Report https://www.worldastrologyreport.com on his substack page.
..Whose article I featured in the post https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?107798-Geomagnetic-Reversals-and-Ice-Ages&p=1698129&viewfull=1#post1698129
... which correlates how astrology, spirituality, historical records, psychic predictions might converge to give us the clearest picture possible of where we are now and will be in the near future.
I mentioned Ben Davidson's work to Dan in hopes he will write more about how current science figures into that list.
Dan is familiar with Ben's work and I'm hoping that work will figure into his upcoming articles.
I also added an update to the post here about the accomplishments of Sir Isaac Newton: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?107798-Geomagnetic-Reversals-and-Ice-Ages&p=1687164&viewfull=1#post1687164
Connecting more of the dots re my theory that Ben was Sir Isaac Newton in a past life.