PDA

View Full Version : About the Ark Of Couvernante.



alrik35
13th February 2011, 13:19
The Nazi's have tried to go to war with Ethiopia in cooperation with the Vatican "Italy" and wanted this Ark.
They didnt succeed , massive deaths when the Ethiopians used the Ark aganst them.

So could the Ark still mean something for us ?

Im really curious !

Swami
13th February 2011, 13:23
The Nazi's have tried to go to war with Ethiopia in cooperation with the Vatican "Italy" and wanted this Ark.
They didnt succeed , massive deaths when the Ethiopians used the Ark aganst them.

So could the Ark still mean something for us ?

Im really curious !

Where did you get that info from, could you provide a link....?

Midnight Rambler
13th February 2011, 13:43
Graham Hancock talks of this. At around 0.20.00 min.

WvNEVvHgOOY&start=1200

slvrfx
13th February 2011, 13:46
The Nazi's have tried to go to war with Ethiopia in cooperation with the Vatican "Italy" and wanted this Ark.
They didnt succeed , massive deaths when the Ethiopians used the Ark aganst them.

So could the Ark still mean something for us ?

Im really curious !

Where did you get that info from, could you provide a link....?

I can't answer the direct question but I correspond with a famous writer who wrote 3 books on bloodline, and just recently we were talking about the Ark. (He wrote an entire book on the Ark.)

He says there are at least 5. One of them is in Ethiopia, but it's a copy.

The Queen of Sheba, whose kingdom was Yemen, married King Solomon, and their son, when grown, asked for the Ark which was kept in Solomon's temple. The original had already been replaced with a copy, for the original was constantly being threatened. The son was given this copy which he took to Ethiopia.

Another significant fact about Ethiopia is that it was the only country to have an original Book of Enoch, which is pre-flood. A second has been found in Romania.

There might be some truth in what you're saying.


(Very significant are the events in the past few months, in Yemen, specifically the anomaly in the gulf of Aden. The build-up of warships and ground troops, also the creation of scenarios that try to justify a military presence. Consider how artifacts are being stolen from there too.)

witchy1
13th February 2011, 13:53
Thanks slvrfx - I'm always learning on this great site. I only know a limited amount on this topic. What are your thoughts on its contents. I have heard a few stories :-)
W

king anthony
13th February 2011, 13:59
WWII - the Nazis had sent massive expeditions in search of ancient knowledge. The Iraq invasions - each time, the United States forces had raided historical sites and places. Each 'global power' has their own (unwritten) story of the truth behind the smoke-and-mirrors of conflict. The dates of the conflicts, murderous events and the start of wars also play a role in ancient knowledge and beliefs - as they fall on very specific dates (and times), for example when blood sacrifices to 'mother earth' need to be made. Each of the true 'global powers' battle with each other over this knowledge; even though they are part of the same - as each wishes to be above the other. Everything has been in front of the eyes of all, but sleeping eyes see only dreams.

buffski
13th February 2011, 15:04
whatever source you look at, be it myth, research or rumour...the unifying theme would appear to denote its function as lock/key to the veil and the integrity of the petri dish. Shakespeare knew only too well the power of the 'aside' and the magic of addressing the audience. To follow conventions or not to...that is the question. :)

jjl
13th February 2011, 15:18
You know, it makes me wonder about storming the cultural antiquties, (and tearing off the heads of mummies). Maybe some of that was about people looking for one in Cairo.

slvrfx
13th February 2011, 15:26
Thanks slvrfx - I'm always learning on this great site. I only know a limited amount on this topic. What are your thoughts on its contents. I have heard a few stories :-)
W

What I have read, is that the Ark was not a religious icon, but was a high form of advanced technology, when placed strategically, can communicate, but also can be an ancient weapon.

It could possibly have had in it, the most ancient of texts, the Tablets of Hermes also know as the Emerald tablets. Written by a descendant of Enki (who goes by other names depending on the cultural/religious belief).

These tablets were supposedly the 'science' behind the creation. The Ancient Mystery sciences.

It was not a Hebrew relic, but actually went back to Egypt and before that Sumeria?

(Made me think President Bush's over-n-over use of the term, "Weapons of Mass Destruction").

Might be a bit of truth considering that the Anunaki supposedly had such a weapon, and Saddam Hussein had his team of archeologists working in the ancient ruins of the Sumerian kingdom, and their ancient relics were stolen when we struck their largest museum, which we claimed was Saddam's palace, Nah!

My writer-friend, who wrote the book about the Ark, listened to Charles' interview and said he's genuine...the REAL THING, and he is very highly suspicious that the 'machine' Charles refers to, might indeed be the Ark, though one of the copies. He also believes this machine/Ark (possibly), might be why Charles is terminally ill.

slvrfx
13th February 2011, 15:29
You know, it makes me wonder about storming the cultural antiquties, (and tearing off the heads of mummies). Maybe some of that was about people looking for one in Cairo.

Or the remaining pieces they need to complete their assembly of yet another copy.

Charles has alluded to this.

(But also I believe very strongly it might be about a certain DNA.)

delaware
13th February 2011, 17:40
thank you so much for posting this, extremely intersting! what a pity that our children are still told the same old lies about history instead of these new discoveries

¤=[Post Update]=¤

thank you so much for posting this, extremely interesting! what a pity our children are still told the same old lies about history and these new discoveries not mentioned with a single word in our schools

jjl
13th February 2011, 17:50
Holy Crap! Hadn't considered either of those possibilties.

slvrfx
13th February 2011, 18:00
I home-taught all of my children when it was in it's early stages and very controversial, specifically so they wouldn't be taught the lies.

It's really not the teachers' faults, for they're only a part of a system that's been in place for a long time, and that teamed with our cultural belief that we can only learn if an expert teaches us.....

My children are all grown and "functioning members of society", like that's something good?

The most positive results are that my children are open to anything and everything, because they've not been taught what NOT to believe in-

They know how to think outside the box...critical thinking... Bill Gates has been lecturing extensively on how schools, even at the University level, are failing our children because they're not teaching them how to think. He says our children are incapable of critical thinking because they've been force-fed.

The second positive effect is that my kids are not boxed into their own particular peer group, but feel comfortable with everyone.

I like to tell people I raised people, not CEOs, Drs, lawyers, etc. Just loving, kind, intelligent, and independent human beings.