View Full Version : 9 Trillion Dollars Missing From the Federal Reserve
jookyle
8th March 2011, 19:37
Sorry if this is a repost, but I don't remember seeing it posted.
The Federal Reserve seems to have misplaced some pocket change.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYNVNhB-m0o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYNVNhB-m0o&feature=player_embedded#at=13
Lord Sidious
9th March 2011, 01:55
Sorry if this is a repost, but I don't remember seeing it posted.
The Federal Reserve seems to have misplaced some pocket change.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYNVNhB-m0o&feature=player_embedded#at=13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYNVNhB-m0o&feature=player_embedded#at=13
There ya go.
thehess
9th March 2011, 03:44
cornered!
:boink:
Fred259
9th March 2011, 03:53
Folks, the sooner you get them into Jail, the sooner it start's to get better.
9tn
What is Obama saying, this was on his watch?
rgray222
9th March 2011, 03:59
The Federal Reserve is an organization created by the US Banks that control the worlds money supply but posting Allen Greyson asking question is not the way to get people to understand the entire Fed issue. Take a look at earlier threads about the Fed and you will find some very interesting info!
Allen Greyson is a discredited individual from Florida that should have been run out of Gongress long ago. The Fed is corrupt and a product of the banks getting richer all the time. Why the banks were bailed out in such a spectacular fashion under Obama is a story to itself! It is a shame that our politicians are so corrupt!
This story needs to be exposed, but trust me, not with this guy!
daledo
9th March 2011, 06:07
Are their any lip readers on the forum? I want to know what the women on her right shoulder is saying. lol
Chicodoodoo
9th March 2011, 06:24
Allen Greyson is a discredited individual from Florida that should have been run out of Gongress long ago.
The Federal Reserve is a massive criminal organization that Congressman Alan Grayson is trying to expose, and Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman does everything in her power to stonewall the inquiry, when it is her job to conduct said inquiry, and you attack Grayson? I fail to see the logic of your actions.
daledo
9th March 2011, 06:38
rgray222, could you please provide documents that point to Alan Greyson being discredited? All I can find is him asking questions that very few people are willing to ask. He is going against the system by doing this... is this why he is discredited?
I personally do not take a very political stand for either party, saying that, I really like this man. He has huge BALLS and more people need to take his place. They get one trouble maker out... lets get 2 to take their place. These questions need to be answered for the American people and they are all dancing around the question because they are afraid of the people finding out the truth. Here are a few more videos of Greyson. Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8W6z6xDhMk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h1pLQ4VWac
jookyle
9th March 2011, 06:58
Obama can't really do anything about the reserve. It's a private institution.
David Mitchell actually said the smartest thing about all of it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdF76QhVEFE
It's true, they just make money out of thin air. Just a number on the computer. The idea that the country is out of money is just silly. Just silly.
Lord Sidious
9th March 2011, 09:50
Obama can't really do anything about the reserve. It's a private institution.
David Mitchell actually said the smartest thing about all of it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdF76QhVEFE
It's true, they just make money out of thin air. Just a number on the computer. The idea that the country is out of money is just silly. Just silly.
If you mean obama has his hands tied because the fed runs the show, then you would be right.
If you meant that he can't because he doesn't have the power, then you would be wrong.
They only have the power they have due to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which could be repealed.
Chicodoodoo
9th March 2011, 19:15
It's true, they just make money out of thin air. Just a number on the computer. The idea that the country is out of money is just silly. Just silly.
No, not so silly. The idea is that the country is out of money that has any value. If you flood the system with money, each unit of money loses value accordingly. It doesn't take long before it becomes worthless "funny money". Look at Zimbabwe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_Zimbabwe) for an example.
conk
9th March 2011, 19:15
[/QUOTE]
If you mean obama has his hands tied because the fed runs the show, then you would be right.
If you meant that he can't because he doesn't have the power, then you would be wrong.
They only have the power they have due to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which could be repealed.[/QUOTE] Yes, my Lord, but remember JFKs speech about secret societies. Just because he has the legal authority to dismantle the Fed does not mean he has the balls to do it. He likely would have to go into hiding or suffer the same fate as JFK - a bullet to the brain.
Anyone remember the vast sum of money that went missing from the Pentagon? A few questions and then it was forgotten. I believe this 'missing' money goes to black box projects or funds our other space program.
Lord Sidious
9th March 2011, 19:18
It's true, they just make money out of thin air. Just a number on the computer. The idea that the country is out of money is just silly. Just silly.
No, not so silly. The idea is that the country is out of money that has any value. If you flood the system with money, each unit of money loses value accordingly. It doesn't take long before it becomes worthless "funny money". Look at Zimbabwe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_Zimbabwe) for an example.
Or, like the real estate market.
People believe that because they bought a house in 2000 for $100,000 and it is now worth $150,000, the house has risen in value.
Incorrectomundo batman.
The dollar is worth less and it takes half again the amount of currency to purchase the same item.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
If you mean obama has his hands tied because the fed runs the show, then you would be right.
If you meant that he can't because he doesn't have the power, then you would be wrong.
They only have the power they have due to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which could be repealed.
Yes, my Lord, but remember JFKs speech about secret societies. Just because he has the legal authority to dismantle the Fed does not mean he has the balls to do it. He likely would have to go into hiding or suffer the same fate as JFK - a bullet to the brain.
Anyone remember the vast sum of money that went missing from the Pentagon? A few questions and then it was forgotten. I believe this 'missing' money goes to black box projects or funds our other space program.
I believe you need to ask Dov Zackheim about that.
Chicodoodoo
9th March 2011, 19:21
If you mean obama has his hands tied because the fed runs the show, then you would be right.
If you meant that he can't because he doesn't have the power, then you would be wrong.
They only have the power they have due to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which could be repealed.
Obama can't do squat. He is owned and directed by the Federal Reserve. Only Congress has the legal power to repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. And guess what? Congress is owned and directed by the Federal Reserve. With enough money, you can own and direct just about anything you want, because money talks. Who controls the money? The Federal Reserve.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss (since 1913).
Lord Sidious
9th March 2011, 19:25
If you mean obama has his hands tied because the fed runs the show, then you would be right.
If you meant that he can't because he doesn't have the power, then you would be wrong.
They only have the power they have due to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which could be repealed.
Obama can't do squat. He is owned and directed by the Federal Reserve. Only Congress has the legal power to repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. And guess what? Congress is owned and directed by the Federal Reserve. With enough money, you can own and direct just about anything you want, because money talks. Who controls the money? The Federal Reserve.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss (since 1913).
Remember that he has the power to issue an executive order.
He will never use it against his employers, but he can do it.
He knows he will get a lead injection if he did.
Maria Stade
9th March 2011, 19:31
How can something that never existed go missing ?
:tape2:
Maria Stade
9th March 2011, 19:41
A little film for ya all
http://blip.tv/file/4603889?utm_source=player_embedded
Chicodoodoo
9th March 2011, 20:04
Remember that he has the power to issue an executive order.
He will never use it against his employers, but he can do it.
He knows he will get a lead injection if he did.
The Executive Order as it is being used is unconstitutional, meaning it is null and void. The powers of the President are clearly spelled out in the Constitution, and they do not include giving executive orders. That's why I said only Congress has the legal authority, because the President does not.
There's something terribly wrong with this country. The reason it has been so thoroughly undermined is that money has purchased control of our government, and few realize it because few understand how the government was designed to work. Even the Supreme Court has been purchased. Their job, as stated in the Constitution, is to enforce the Constitution, which means they should strike down the validity of the Executive Order. But they never have and they never will, because every one of the Justices made their deals with the devil all the way up their climb of the judicial hierarchy ladder. The corruption and control by the money is like the illusion we live under -- complete and pervasive.
Lord Sidious
9th March 2011, 20:27
Remember that he has the power to issue an executive order.
He will never use it against his employers, but he can do it.
He knows he will get a lead injection if he did.
The Executive Order as it is being used is unconstitutional, meaning it is null and void. The powers of the President are clearly spelled out in the Constitution, and they do not include giving executive orders. That's why I said only Congress has the legal authority, because the President does not.
There's something terribly wrong with this country. The reason it has been so thoroughly undermined is that money has purchased control of our government, and few realize it because few understand how the government was designed to work. Even the Supreme Court has been purchased. Their job, as stated in the Constitution, is to enforce the Constitution, which means they should strike down the validity of the Executive Order. But they never have and they never will, because every one of the Justices made their deals with the devil all the way up their climb of the judicial hierarchy ladder. The corruption and control by the money is like the illusion we live under -- complete and pervasive.
The corporation known as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is in a declared state of emergency, hence the executive order ability.
Jake
9th March 2011, 20:51
Wow,,, Just since September??? $30,000.00 per man woman and child in America??? JUST SINCE SEPTEMBER??? No oversight??? MYGODDDD!!!!!
Lord Sidious
10th March 2011, 02:30
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLAg8a0vCZQ
Give that a whirl.
Icecold
10th March 2011, 02:52
Yes, see Fred's work on this very interesting. lol
Lifesong
10th March 2011, 03:18
Just bringing this over from another thread in case anyone's interested. Its an interesting link:
... Attached is a website showing the ownership of the Federal Reserve. It shows that basically most of the big corporations are intertwined and go back to the same families. Please scroll through all 5 charts. (Granted this list was compiled in 1976, but I'm sure not much has changed since then if you look at the big picture)
I could not find a more current list, but I'm not the best researcher, nor have the time.
http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml
After looking at the chart it was clear to me that these families control a good portion of our energy sources, food supplies, media and banking system. And probably much more. So, how do we break their stanglehold?
Chicodoodoo
10th March 2011, 03:20
The corporation known as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is in a declared state of emergency, hence the executive order ability.
Regarding what is known as a State of National Emergency, Paula Demers writes: "According to the United States Constitution, Article 1, only Congress shall make federal law. However, since the War and Emergency Powers Act of 1933, every president has usurped lawmaking powers. Their 'laws' are called Executive Orders (EOs). These EOs, not our Constitution, are what is governing America today. The War and Emergency Powers Act enables ... the president to declare a national emergency, and thereby become a dictator."
If this is true, it means the War and Emergency Powers Act of 1933 is unconstitutional, and thereby null and void. Only Congress can make federal law, not the stinking President.
Declaring a state of emergency when unnecessary is a ploy to subvert the Constitution. That's why so many "emergencies" have been in effect for decades! They are lies, damn lies, and dictator decrees!
Lord Sidious
10th March 2011, 03:27
The corporation known as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is in a declared state of emergency, hence the executive order ability.
Regarding what is known as a State of National Emergency, Paula Demers writes: "According to the United States Constitution, Article 1, only Congress shall make federal law. However, since the War and Emergency Powers Act of 1933, every president has usurped lawmaking powers. Their 'laws' are called Executive Orders (EOs). These EOs, not our Constitution, are what is governing America today. The War and Emergency Powers Act enables ... the president to declare a national emergency, and thereby become a dictator."
If this is true, it means the War and Emergency Powers Act of 1933 is unconstitutional, and thereby null and void. Only Congress can make federal law, not the stinking President.
Declaring a state of emergency when unnecessary is a ploy to subvert the Constitution. That's why so many "emergencies" have been in effect for decades! They are lies, damn lies, and dictator decrees!
Everything you say is correct, except you made one assumption, I bolded.
They say it was necessary to prevent a financial collapse.
Funny thing is, the federal reserve act of 1913 had a period of 20 years for anyone that would be damaged by that act to protest.
Add them together and you will get the picture.
modwiz
10th March 2011, 03:41
Allen Greyson is a discredited individual from Florida that should have been run out of Gongress long ago.
The Federal Reserve is a massive criminal organization that Congressman Alan Grayson is trying to expose, and Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman does everything in her power to stonewall the inquiry, when it is her job to conduct said inquiry, and you attack Grayson? I fail to see the logic of your actions.
I am with you CDD. I find this posters' view and other things a little "spooky". lol
Calz
10th March 2011, 04:07
It's true, they just make money out of thin air. Just a number on the computer. The idea that the country is out of money is just silly. Just silly.
No, not so silly. The idea is that the country is out of money that has any value. If you flood the system with money, each unit of money loses value accordingly. It doesn't take long before it becomes worthless "funny money". Look at Zimbabwe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_Zimbabwe) for an example.
The ol' "wheelbarrow full of money to buy a loaf of bread" saying comes to mind.
Lord Sidious
10th March 2011, 04:10
It's true, they just make money out of thin air. Just a number on the computer. The idea that the country is out of money is just silly. Just silly.
No, not so silly. The idea is that the country is out of money that has any value. If you flood the system with money, each unit of money loses value accordingly. It doesn't take long before it becomes worthless "funny money". Look at Zimbabwe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_Zimbabwe) for an example.
The ol' "wheelbarrow full of money to buy a loaf of bread" saying comes to mind.
Aha, the good ol Weimar Republic.
It is about to become worldwide.
Barron
10th March 2011, 04:23
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html - who owns the Fed. Owned by private banks, majority shareholder is Goldman Sachs.
The US Federal Reserve is owned by Jewish Private Bankers.
it is a consortium of 9 Jewish-owned banks with the Rothschilds at the head.
1. Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam
5. Lehman Brothers of NY
6. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of NY (now Shearson American Express)
7. Goldman Sachs of MY
8. National Bank of Comerce NY (Motgan Guarty Trust (JP Morgan - Equitable Life - Levi p. Morton are principal shareholders.)
9. Hanover trust of NY (William and david Rockefeller & Chase national Bank NY are principal shareholders.)
So, as you can see the Federal Reserve in the USA is no more "federal" than FedEx! (Federal Express - the courier company!)
jorr lundstrom
10th March 2011, 04:34
I lifted the surface of the see and found a sleeping dog. Salvador Dali.
This are the last acts of totally rotten people. :noidea::noidea::noidea:
:noidea::noidea::noidea::noidea:
No carrots
Chicodoodoo
10th March 2011, 04:45
Everything you say is correct, except you made one assumption, I bolded.
Any financial "state of emergency" is fake and unnecessary, because it was deliberately engineered.
How many "national emergencies" are currently in effect and constantly being renewed to maintain subversion of the Constitution? I don't know, but there is at least one (http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/10/obama-announces-state-of-emergency-extension/) that has nothing to do with the one you are assuming. It too was deliberately engineered.
In a letter issued to the heads of Congress today, President Barack Obama announced yet another one year extension of a State of National Emergency which has been going on in the United States since September 14, 2001. This means that as of Tuesday America will officially be entering its tenth year at an emergency posture that seems destined to last pretty much forever.
Established in 1976, the National Emergencies Act grants certain powers (established in Title 50 Chapter 34 of the United States legal code) to the president during times of emergency. Amongst the law’s primary purposes was to prevent a US president from creating an open-ended state of emergency.
Ironically however the law provides for the annual renewal of an existing state of emergency with only a notification of Congress required. This has meant, in a state of open-ended warfare, Presidents Bush and Obama have been able to maintain a state of open-ended emergency anyhow.
olgraybear
10th March 2011, 04:49
edit...............
modwiz
10th March 2011, 05:07
I lifted the surface of the see and found a sleeping dog. Salvador Dali.
This are the last acts of totally rotten people. :noidea::noidea::noidea:
:noidea::noidea::noidea::noidea:
[
No carrots
No Carrots!
Uncle Ben, you are officially in the rogues gallery.
Do you have any idea how serious, no carrots is???? lol
jorr lundstrom
10th March 2011, 05:34
Well Moddy, there are wizards and there wizards. Wizards that can get people to beliieve that
9 Trillion non existing dollars has dissappeared, I wont give any carrots, and the stupid
people who beljeves it dont deserve any carrots. So lots of love, but no carrots
If you experience an abstinence, I can deliver some carrots to you personally. LOL
(
Lord Sidious
10th March 2011, 05:37
Everything you say is correct, except you made one assumption, I bolded.
Any financial "state of emergency" is fake and unnecessary, because it was deliberately engineered.
How many "national emergencies" are currently in effect and constantly being renewed to maintain subversion of the Constitution? I don't know, but there is at least one (http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/10/obama-announces-state-of-emergency-extension/) that has nothing to do with the one you are assuming. It too was deliberately engineered.
In a letter issued to the heads of Congress today, President Barack Obama announced yet another one year extension of a State of National Emergency which has been going on in the United States since September 14, 2001. This means that as of Tuesday America will officially be entering its tenth year at an emergency posture that seems destined to last pretty much forever.
Established in 1976, the National Emergencies Act grants certain powers (established in Title 50 Chapter 34 of the United States legal code) to the president during times of emergency. Amongst the law’s primary purposes was to prevent a US president from creating an open-ended state of emergency.
Ironically however the law provides for the annual renewal of an existing state of emergency with only a notification of Congress required. This has meant, in a state of open-ended warfare, Presidents Bush and Obama have been able to maintain a state of open-ended emergency anyhow.
I know full well of the use of hegelian dialectics.
So yes, I know that the state of emergency is engineered.
Most things are, to justify a response.
Chicodoodoo
10th March 2011, 05:57
So yes, I know that the state of emergency is engineered.
Most things are, to justify a response.
The point is that it is deceptively engineered. We're being conned, and it is hurting us. It's getting worse and worse. We need to do something about it instead of silently accepting the abuse.
Icecold
10th March 2011, 06:04
The US economy will collapse very soon and there is nothing...nothing...nothing that can be done about it.
Tip for economy collapse watchers.....
Supplies:
1. Deck Chair
2. Sunny day full of solar flares
3. Solar flare blocking sunglasses
4. Pair of Speedos, preferably a red colour
5. Coconut and carrot suntan lotion
6. Large glass of iced carrot juice.
7. Have a nice day in the sun watching the largest economic collapse in the history of the world.
Lifesong
10th March 2011, 06:10
Speaking of engineered, I think this qualifies. I'm left wondering if it was a 'test case'?
2008–2010 Icelandic financial crisis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%932010_Icelandic_financial_crisis)
"...the collapse of all three of the country's major commercial banks following their difficulties in refinancing their short-term debt and a run on deposits in the United Kingdom. Relative to the size of its economy, Iceland’s banking collapse is the largest suffered by any country in economic history."
Maria Stade
10th March 2011, 06:22
Michael Moore Speaks in Madison 5 march
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgNuSEZ8CDw&feature=player_embedded#at=910
Merkaba360
10th March 2011, 06:48
How can something that never existed go missing ?
:tape2:
The same way that humans go missing even though they never existed. Illusions believed in are manifested and experienced as real. Such is the power of creatorship. So lets uncreate our belief in money.
Icecold
10th March 2011, 06:57
How can something that never existed go missing ?
:tape2:
The same way that humans go missing even though they never existed. Illusions believed in are manifested and experienced as real. Such is the power of creatorship. So lets uncreate our belief in money.
Yes that is the only solution.
Nothing is going to stop the economy from collapsing.
Adopting a system without money is a way out of that hole.
Chicodoodoo
10th March 2011, 07:16
Adopting a system without money is a way out of that hole.
Our most opportune time to dismantle this hierarchical system of economic slavery is precisely the moment the economy disintegrates. At that moment, when the money is worthless, the ruling sociopaths will have lost their primary means to purchase our cooperation. They will have no more power than the common man for a brief instant. That is exactly why they have brainwashed us to believe that it is our moment of greatest weakness, and why they will offer us their carefully prepared solution, which will just be another con-game.
Will we be stupid enough to take it? Do sheep get fleeced?
Merkaba360
10th March 2011, 07:42
I mean how hard is it to just go gather people up and do whats necessary without money.
OK everybody we need to build a home for everyone. Many loving will offer to help just go around there area and build stuff until those need are taken care of. And others building the supplies. Ok whats next. Clothes you say. Ok, we need volunteers with knowledge in clothes making.....on and on.
11alone
10th March 2011, 07:54
It sems to me like shes knows or is hiding something. :boink:
Lord Sidious
10th March 2011, 15:03
Warning!!
Angry Irishman ahead, bad language by the ton.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koY6kXhQDQo
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.