PDA

View Full Version : time pirates...



Teakai
11th March 2011, 09:08
I have just come across this amazing genius guys's channel on you tube. He knows illuminati speak, the symbols, the colours, the alphabet language they use and he talks about time pirates.

He says MAD magazine is an illuminati voice tool and that they have predicted many things which have come to pass years previously.

As an example - somewhere around 1984 there was a comic strip about Michael Jackson and they weren't sure if he was going to die by drug overdose or by another means (I've forgotten the other option) it was an either/or scenario.

Here's a link to one of his videos. He talks fast because he only has a minute, but the idea is to pause it and study on what he points out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yv0CEO1Hc0I

I totally recommend a visit to his channel.

After I heard him explain what a time pirate was and what they do it made me think of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9P53lbzBJ8&feature=fvst

I'm still going through his stuff, but wanted to share it with you guys.

the trojan
11th March 2011, 10:28
crazy stuff teakai,very interesting,my brain is jumping allover the place as it senses new knowledge.
the guy could have edited,stretched,basically went into more detail than just showing one minute quickies.
but definitely interesting..thanks for the link.

Teakai
11th March 2011, 10:35
I know.

It shifts the brain into a totally new gear.

Perhaps watching the videos from the start gives one a better perspective of how he works. I don't know why he only has 1 minute - but it sure beats sitting through lots of not much.
He has said in one of them to pause what he's pointing out and read through it.

When I first came across him I didn't pay much attention to it. Possibly due to the speed - and some of the stuff he was saying - like about how the illuminati use the letters of the alphabet just sounded like ramblings - but having watched a few, I think this guy is a genius with a whole lot of good info to share.

Newlyn
11th March 2011, 10:52
I have not watch many of them, but my thoughts so far is that time is an illusion.

And through our intuition we can be astonishing right about things that has not even happened yet.

Interesting though.

Lord Sidious
11th March 2011, 11:01
I have just come across this amazing genius guys's channel on you tube. He knows illuminati speak, the symbols, the colours, the alphabet language they use and he talks about time pirates.

He says MAD magazine is an illuminati voice tool and that they have predicted many things which have come to pass years previously.

As an example - somewhere around 1984 there was a comic strip about Michael Jackson and they weren't sure if he was going to die by drug overdose or by another means (I've forgotten the other option) it was an either/or scenario.

Here's a link to one of his videos. He talks fast because he only has a minute, but the idea is to pause it and study on what he points out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yv0CEO1Hc0I

I totally recommend a visit to his channel.

After I heard him explain what a time pirate was and what they do it made me think of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9P53lbzBJ8&feature=fvst

I'm still going through his stuff, but wanted to share it with you guys.

There ya go nuggets.

Newlyn
11th March 2011, 11:25
I have just come across this amazing genius guys's channel on you tube. He knows illuminati speak, the symbols, the colours, the alphabet language they use and he talks about time pirates.

He says MAD magazine is an illuminati voice tool and that they have predicted many things which have come to pass years previously.

As an example - somewhere around 1984 there was a comic strip about Michael Jackson and they weren't sure if he was going to die by drug overdose or by another means (I've forgotten the other option) it was an either/or scenario.

Here's a link to one of his videos. He talks fast because he only has a minute, but the idea is to pause it and study on what he points out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yv0CEO1Hc0I

I totally recommend a visit to his channel.

After I heard him explain what a time pirate was and what they do it made me think of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9P53lbzBJ8&feature=fvst

I'm still going through his stuff, but wanted to share it with you guys.

There ya go nuggets.

HAHA The dark lord is a very helping person :)

Trust him

ghostrider
11th March 2011, 12:59
saw this clip about a six months ago good one, time travel is possible, the first thing the ptb do is attach science fiction to science to hide truth and you knee jerk and say o I saw thing in a sci fi movie so it can't be true. thanks for the link, happy hunting...

KosmicKat
11th March 2011, 13:12
WRT the "Chaplin Time Traveller", the most likely explanation I have heard put forward so far, is that the lady (benefit of the doubt) is holding an ice pack to manage dental pain. She may be on her way to the dentist, but AFAIK, the only widely available pain remedy at the time would have been aspirin.

PHARAOH
11th March 2011, 13:14
Great post, Teakai

Teakai
11th March 2011, 13:20
There ya go nuggets.

You are exceptionally good at that, M'lord :)

Thank you.

Teakai
11th March 2011, 13:25
WRT the "Chaplin Time Traveller", the most likely explanation I have heard put forward so far, is that the lady (benefit of the doubt) is holding an ice pack to manage dental pain. She may be on her way to the dentist, but AFAIK, the only widely available pain remedy at the time would have been aspirin.

Didn't they have laundanum and opium, heroin, marijuana and whisky back then? I remember seeing old ads for children's cough syrup containing heroin.
(No wonder they were seen and not heard)

jjl
11th March 2011, 13:33
I think she looks like J Edgar Hoover in drag. Look at the shoes!

Mare
11th March 2011, 15:02
In the first Time Pirate video this guy talks about a painting called The Clubfoot. It was painted in Italy in 1642 (not 1652 which was the date of the artists death) by the Spanish artist Jusepe de Ribera of a young crippled Neapolitan boy. It's original title was The Dwarf but its title was changed on entering The Louvres collection. The piece of paper in his hand reads: DA MIHI ELIMO SINAM PROPTER AMOREM DEI - 'Give me alms, for the love of God' which is essentially a work-permit for begging on the streets of Naples.

Now this information has taken me approximately five minutes to collate so why couldn't the expert do that? Whether you think the boy in the painting looks like the character from the MAD comics is up to you but again I would think that the expert in the video would at least know how to spell Alfred E Neuman correctly. Then again he did only have a minute!

king anthony
11th March 2011, 15:21
Is not an assumption, based on human arrogance, that only 'modern day' human beings (or other similar species) have created a technology for wireless communication - only at this time!?

Has there not been record of technology, far advanced then what (common) human beings are aware of in this 'time', which has been made know throughout recorded history!?

If this footage is true, can it not be that what is being witnessed is not 'time travel', but rather someone/something accidentally 'caught on tape' with a communication device that was had at the time!?

Teakai
11th March 2011, 15:24
Now this information has taken me approximately five minutes to collate so why couldn't the expert do that? Whether you think the boy in the painting looks like the character from the MAD comics is up to you but again I would think that the expert in the video would at least know how to spell Alfred E Neuman correctly. Then again he did only have a minute!

Maybe he was only interested in what the paper said as passing interest.

That he didn't look it up doesn't discount anything he's pointed out - does it?

I'd lay bets he did know what it said and he wanted to make the 'Wot, me worry?", joke.

HURRITT ENYETO
11th March 2011, 15:42
Is not an assumption, based on human arrogance, that only 'modern day' human beings (or other similar species) have created a technology for wireless communication - only at this time!?

Has there not been record of technology, far advanced then what (common) human beings are aware of in this 'time', which has been made know throughout recorded history!?

If this footage is true, can it not be that what is being witnessed is not 'time travel', but rather someone/something accidentally 'caught on tape' with a communication device that was had at the time!?

I remember an explanation for the Charlie Chaplain Man/Woman was either one of the very first portable Radios with an ear piece connected to a wire, or an ear trumpet i cant remember which.
the theory was that she was muttering to herself at whatever was being said on the wireless/trumpet.
Seems more plausible than time travel (but not half as fun) :)

vibrations
11th March 2011, 16:03
There have been at least two people travelling thru time to be able to call each other. Oh, and I few hundred phone company employees to facilitate the network. Also it could be walkie-talkie what shrinks number of involved to two. And maybe is an ice brick.
But looking thru shot, I would say that the footage is not from 1928, the transition is catchy. I know how they made it in early years of cinema and the crossfade was more abrupt, not so smooth. It looks like some much more recent to me.

Hawkwind
11th March 2011, 16:06
If there are any talented lip readers in our community, could you please confirm whether or not the person in the 1928 clip is saying "Beam me up, Scotty." :gossip:

MariaDine
11th March 2011, 16:53
------------------------------------------

MariaDine
11th March 2011, 17:34
-----------------------------------------------

jsb_swampfox
11th March 2011, 18:14
check out the episode of Tom & Jerry on CARTOON NETWORK RIGHT NOW

jsb_swampfox
11th March 2011, 18:21
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjURN7f6uWo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiZNigG1XM0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iA_AOh4yCc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hLG8kD_OyA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tznu4GXaRHs&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz6WW8xYXGY&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duL89CE3Y8I&feature=related

actually it starts slow start at about 2:30 in this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiZNigG1XM0&NR=1

Lord Sidious
11th March 2011, 19:24
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjURN7f6uWo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiZNigG1XM0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iA_AOh4yCc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hLG8kD_OyA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tznu4GXaRHs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz6WW8xYXGY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duL89CE3Y8I&feature=related

actually it starts slow start at about 2:30 in this one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiZNigG1XM0&NR=1

Let's see how that worked.

Mare
11th March 2011, 20:48
Maybe he was only interested in what the paper said as passing interest.That he didn't look it up doesn't discount anything he's pointed out - does it?

But it's central to his argument. - the fascinating clue in Latin in the boys hand. If you are going to make the assertion that Mad is a voice-piece of the Illuminati then at least get basic facts correct. There is no connection between the character Alfred E Neuman and that painting other than a passing resemblance. My impression is that he doesn't expect you to look it up but just to take his word for it. On the subject of time pirates which I know nothing about, he shows an out-of-focus page of a comic for 9 seconds and then suggests 'it says it all'. Sorry, but what says it all? -that's hardly conclusive material, and for me undermines the rest of it.

jsb_swampfox
11th March 2011, 21:24
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjURN7f6uWo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiZNigG1XM0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iA_AOh4yCc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hLG8kD_OyA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tznu4GXaRHs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz6WW8xYXGY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duL89CE3Y8I&feature=related

actually it starts slow start at about 2:30 in this one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiZNigG1XM0&NR=1

Let's see how that worked.

Sorry guys, this is my first forum...forgive me for not know what the heck i am doing

Teakai
11th March 2011, 22:17
There have been at least two people travelling thru time to be able to call each other. Oh, and I few hundred phone company employees to facilitate the network. Also it could be walkie-talkie what shrinks number of involved to two. And maybe is an ice brick.
But looking thru shot, I would say that the footage is not from 1928, the transition is catchy. I know how they made it in early years of cinema and the crossfade was more abrupt, not so smooth. It looks like some much more recent to me.

It may not be a mobile phone (as we understand it).
I figure if you have the technology to time travel you may have the technology to be able to communicate during time travel also - and not necessarily from the same time dimension.

People are assuming it's a mobile phone only because it fits their perception of understanding.

Teakai
11th March 2011, 22:23
Is not an assumption, based on human arrogance, that only 'modern day' human beings (or other similar species) have created a technology for wireless communication - only at this time!?

Has there not been record of technology, far advanced then what (common) human beings are aware of in this 'time', which has been made know throughout recorded history!?

If this footage is true, can it not be that what is being witnessed is not 'time travel', but rather someone/something accidentally 'caught on tape' with a communication device that was had at the time!?

I remember an explanation for the Charlie Chaplain Man/Woman was either one of the very first portable Radios with an ear piece connected to a wire, or an ear trumpet i cant remember which.
the theory was that she was muttering to herself at whatever was being said on the wireless/trumpet.
Seems more plausible than time travel (but not half as fun) :)

Maybe, Hurritt. But taking it in conjunction with what the guy in the video says about time pirates - there might be something in it.
I mean, apparently people are going through wormholes to get to mars, the moon, pine gap etc. Maybe they're going through wormholes to different time dimensions also.

We're not in Kansa any more.
:)

Heartsong
11th March 2011, 22:25
WRT the "Chaplin Time Traveller", the most likely explanation I have heard put forward so far, is that the lady (benefit of the doubt) is holding an ice pack to manage dental pain. She may be on her way to the dentist, but AFAIK, the only widely available pain remedy at the time would have been aspirin.

Look at the size of "the lady's" feet!

Teakai
11th March 2011, 22:38
But it's central to his argument. - the fascinating clue in Latin in the boys hand. If you are going to make the assertion that Mad is a voice-piece of the Illuminati then at least get basic facts correct. There is no connection between the character Alfred E Neuman and that painting other than a passing resemblance. My impression is that he doesn't expect you to look it up but just to take his word for it. On the subject of time pirates which I know nothing about, he shows an out-of-focus page of a comic for 9 seconds and then suggests 'it says it all'. Sorry, but what says it all? -that's hardly conclusive material, and for me undermines the rest of it.

Hi Mare - I was only using that video to explain what he meant by time pirates. His other videos at his channel show the relationship between mad magazine and the illuminati.

I don't think he's trying to sell himself or his stuff. He's just putting it out there for people to take it or leave it.
I figure he must be onto something - this is the second channel he's started. His first was shut down.

HURRITT ENYETO
11th March 2011, 22:45
Time travelers.......and now a member named Chrononaut viewing the thread.................
My spidee senses are tingling :)

Fred Steeves
11th March 2011, 22:51
We went totally through the "lady" time traveler video from 1928 several months ago on the last forum I was on. After some time someone posted a link to an ad from that era showing almost the exact same device, it was some sort of new fangled ear horn. I'm out for the night now, but being I'm still registered on the old forum. I'll track down me old posts from then and post the link tomorrow... provided some sleuth here doesn't come across it first in the meantime.

It's very anticlimactic.

Cheers,
Fred S.

Teakai
11th March 2011, 22:57
We went totally through the "lady" time traveler video from 1928 several months ago on the last forum I was on. After some time someone posted a link to an ad from that era showing almost the exact same device, it was some sort of new fangled ear horn. I'm out for the night now, but being I'm still registered on the old forum. I'll track down me old posts from then and post the link tomorrow... provided some sleuth here doesn't come across it first in the meantime.

It's very anticlimactic.

Cheers,
Fred S.

But Fred, it's only anti climactic if you believe the story that it's some new fangled ear horn. :)
Thought - she's walking down the street alone - why would she be holding her earhorn to her ear? And who is she talking to?

Mare
11th March 2011, 23:24
Hi Teakai,

thanks for the posting anyway, you gave me a rare opportunity to test my amateur art-detective skills. I hope I didn't come across as negative though, I just relish a debate sometimes.

Many thanks,

Mare.

Teakai
11th March 2011, 23:33
Hi Teakai,

thanks for the posting anyway, you gave me a rare opportunity to test my amateur art-detective skills. I hope I didn't come across as negative though, I just relish a debate sometimes.

Many thanks,

Mare.

No worries, Mare. I'd be questioning the same thing if it was based on just one video being used to make some kind of point :)

loveandgratitude
12th March 2011, 00:26
Remember time is an illusion. When you go to sleep at night, then wake up in the morning, how long do you think you have been asleep? It seems like a few winks, but in time reality it has been 6 - 8 perhaps 10 hours. In that time you were living a whole different life. It is possible to go back and alter things but only in extreme circumstances. What is more interesting is that we can travel into the future and prepare a path for ourselves to follow. Much like when you ski in the snow you leave tracks that are easy to follow. Interesting subject. Much to learn.

Sync
12th March 2011, 01:05
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWvMPVN4vgw&feature=related




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tILHyYKeOrc&feature=related


Occum's Razor, err, cell phone...

Siemen's released it in 1924.

By the way, The Circus premiered in 1928.

Those Hollywood types and their technology!

Teakai
12th March 2011, 01:48
Occum's Razor, err, cell phone...

Siemen's released it in 1924.

By the way, The Circus premiered in 1928.

Those Hollywood types and their technology!

Thanks, Sync - but why would a lone woman be walking along holding one of these awkward doodads to her ear?

And isn't she/he talking? I remember someone mention something about lip reading.

Sync
12th March 2011, 08:29
No worries....

There are no accidents in film-making... this set (an exterior location likely on a back-lot) has "extras" that are paid to walk the gauntlet in order to provide background atmosphere.

Back then, the novelty of film production was huge and it was not uncommon for members of the production staff to insert loved ones into the frame (this practice is still common).

You cannot shoot random people on a street without securing their signed consent because their likeness will be forever enshrined on celluloid.
Furthermore, back then, film crews were absolutely massive; there were likely no random lurkers wandering into a Chaplin movie.

The time-traveler is probably someone's nana struggling to hear the assistant director shout out commands to the "background" talent. In fact, she gets confused and looks out of the frame to one of the over 50 crew members right off screen (lighting, grips, electric, set dressers, wardrobe, make up, camera operators, craft service, little Billy; her grandson line producer, etc...). She is probably cussing at the A.D. who was likely screaming at her to keep moving through the frame and to not stop in the middle of the freaking shot.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiIrpEMbQ2M

She seems a bit flustered. After all, the camera was rolling.

But anything is possible.

witchy1
12th March 2011, 09:58
I'm interested in this gadget. Can anyone please explain exactly what this does. Is it as he says?

Static electricity is one of the biggest lies in science. They know Damn well that exciting matter between 2 poles, draws raw plasma from hyperspace. Moving a band with high elasticity past 2 anodized screens pulls tiny ionic electroplasmic vortecies from a higher dimension, rather between dimensions. This taps into the unique property of the electron called "spooky action at a distance" where the same electron may exist simoutameously in 2 places across vast differences. The more surface area anything has, the more quantum wormholes it possesses. This sounds like a lot to grasp. It's really quite simple. This is the same principle which keeps a gecko stuck to a clean glass wimdow



4sG_5QMZH44
ZY6Xeht0424
gb4SnswOdkc