PDA

View Full Version : Is new Jerusalem UFO video proof that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth?



Eric J (Viking)
20th March 2011, 17:07
Is new Jerusalem UFO video proof that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth?

March 20, 2011. Michael E. Salla, Ph.D.
The Dome of the Rock is an Islamic Shrine built over Jerusalem's Temple Mount

Eligael Gedalyovich, who released the first video of a UFO hovering over the Dome of the Rock, Jerusalem on January 28, 2011, claims to have found new video that reveals in greater detail the UFO that appeared that day. Eligael claims to have been present during the filming of the very first video of the Dome of the Rock UFO which he posted to his Youtube channel. Another video soon emerged from a different source (Shshsh331) from another angle, and appeared to independently confirm the original video posted by Eligael. These first two videos have been widely viewed to be the most credible of the videos that have emerged so far of the Dome of the Rock UFO incident. At least one of the subsequent videos that have emerged, has been concluded to be a fake intended to discredit the first two genuine videos. Now Eligael has posted 3 seconds of what he claims to be conclusive proof that the Dome of the Rock UFO was in fact an interplanetary extraterrestrial vehicle.

The new Eligael video shows what appears to be a large metallic shaped flying saucer hovering over the Dome of the Rock, and casting a light in the vicinity.

Read more at: http://exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-101.htm

viking

bluestflame
20th March 2011, 17:15
a catalyst ...awaiting the next more open visitation

tkh123186
20th March 2011, 17:26
I have always felt that it was the best UFO event ever captured on film and I think his new video will further confirm this. Can't wait till its released and to see all the debunkers call BS on it.

Eric J (Viking)
20th March 2011, 17:57
Yep ...soon soon soon...

They cannot keep us in the dark forever... Oh how they try!!

viking

the trojan
20th March 2011, 20:08
okay,ive downloaded it and slowed it down even more.
A the lit craft does not appear to be above the dome but closer to the viewer

B the connection between the dome and the lit craft appears to be the light source on the dome changing as the lit craft moves
but as i state in A this does not seem plausible

C the lit craft does not lilluminate what appears to be telegraph poles/streetlamp to the left ....no change at all

D the lit craft does not appear to illuminate anything but the top of the dome.
this is not plausible due to the floodlight from the bottom of the lit craft.

E The light source of the top of the dome ,'moves',with the craft which suggests authenticity,but the light on the dome stops just before the vid ends,and the lit craft keeps moving.

So ,in my opinion...fake....This is not enough to convince me of its authenticity.
And as I have stated before,children in their bedrooms have the technology to create this...easily.
This very fact casts a suspicious light on any video 'evidence' presented in this format.
And sadly ,as well as strengthening any evidence also weakens it.

three seconds is nonsense and I wonder at the intent.
Why not release all footage.

Humble Janitor
20th March 2011, 20:51
okay,ive downloaded it and slowed it down even more.
A the lit craft does not appear to be above the dome but closer to the viewer

B the connection between the dome and the lit craft appears to be the light source on the dome changing as the lit craft moves
but as i state in A this does not seem plausible

C the lit craft does not lilluminate what appears to be telegraph poles/streetlamp to the left ....no change at all

D the lit craft does not appear to illuminate anything but the top of the dome.
this is not plausible due to the floodlight from the bottom of the lit craft.

E The light source of the top of the dome ,'moves',with the craft which suggests authenticity,but the light on the dome stops just before the vid ends,and the lit craft keeps moving.

So ,in my opinion...fake....This is not enough to convince me of its authenticity.
And as I have stated before,children in their bedrooms have the technology to create this...easily.
This very fact casts a suspicious light on any video 'evidence' presented in this format.
And sadly ,as well as strengthening any evidence also weakens it.

three seconds is nonsense and I wonder at the intent.
Why not release all footage.

But two independent sources filmed the same thing!

Unless they knew each other beforehand,it's very hard to fake such videos.

One of the biggest problems with UFO videos is the lack of multiple witnesses.

Not so with two different videos of the SAME subject!

It's easy to dismiss it as a hoax but think about the implications if it is what we think it is!

Gustav
20th March 2011, 20:52
Not releasing everything is to gain more attention. It's a teaser. Works every time. I would be curious to see the rest of the vid. I'll keep track of this. Thanks for posting.

the trojan
20th March 2011, 21:19
okay,ive downloaded it and slowed it down even more.
A the lit craft does not appear to be above the dome but closer to the viewer

B the connection between the dome and the lit craft appears to be the light source on the dome changing as the lit craft moves
but as i state in A this does not seem plausible

C the lit craft does not lilluminate what appears to be telegraph poles/streetlamp to the left ....no change at all

D the lit craft does not appear to illuminate anything but the top of the dome.
this is not plausible due to the floodlight from the bottom of the lit craft.

E The light source of the top of the dome ,'moves',with the craft which suggests authenticity,but the light on the dome stops just before the vid ends,and the lit craft keeps moving.

So ,in my opinion...fake....This is not enough to convince me of its authenticity.
And as I have stated before,children in their bedrooms have the technology to create this...easily.
This very fact casts a suspicious light on any video 'evidence' presented in this format.
And sadly ,as well as strengthening any evidence also weakens it.

three seconds is nonsense and I wonder at the intent.
Why not release all footage.

But two independent sources filmed the same thing!

Unless they knew each other beforehand,it's very hard to fake such videos.

One of the biggest problems with UFO videos is the lack of multiple witnesses.

Not so with two different videos of the SAME subject!

It's easy to dismiss it as a hoax but think about the implications if it is what we think it is!

My comments were on the 3 second video not the older(well, previous) dome videos which I have not commented on.
I do not see any relation between these videos.
the three second 'new' video has a lit craft which appears to be very close to the ground,and moving in a forward motion away from the dome.
In the other vids shot at distance there does not appear to be any movement and the light appears to hover above the dome and nothing else.

i agree that it will be interesting when the longer version is released,and I will then judge that on its merits or lack of them.

str8thinker
20th March 2011, 22:30
I tend to agree with the trojan on this. The earlier two independent videos are probably authentic, however, it amazes me that Eligael has managed to extract such closeup detail in his latest one of the same event, that nobody has done before. You'd think that for an event as famous as this, someone else by now would have released a YouTube closeup - if there was something to see. That no one has implies that there never was sufficient detail to be gained by magnifying the video, i.e., the recent one is fake. Anyway, the UFO closeup looks like the starship Enterprise in cross section; it doesn't remain directly over the center of the dome as one would have expected, and it doesn't take off. And, as the trojan says, the lighting everywhere else is wrong. Fake. A good AfterEffects job here.

This is highly marketable stuff. I can smell a book coming out, a few more interviews, even a UFOTV documentary...

Eric J (Viking)
21st March 2011, 10:32
We have lots of unexplained phenomena around the globe at the moment!! We'll see what the rest of the video looks like ...

Found this ....

UFO Sighting | Weather Radar Detects UFO Bigger than Belgium

Unusual formations have been appearing on government weather satellite imagery all over the world. Satellite Weather images over Europe have detected an enormous unidentified object that is larger than Belgium!
The key witness has recorded their observation in order to understand exactly what was seen. The video was uploaded onto YouTube with the following statement:

“Can somebody tell my what the heck is going on ?”

In recent years a number of similar formations have occurred around the world. The first time UFO Briefcase came across this type of phenomenon was the repeated incidents across Australia.

The most famous Australian incident resembles are large doughnut-like formation that was was positioned over the lower South-west Corner of Western Australia.

A similar appearance again happened on the 22nd January of 2010, however this time the ‘unknown object’ was positioned over the city of Melbourne. This particular formation almost resembles a giant CD with binary information.

Only one hour later and on the other side of the country, a new formation was observed that I consider to be the most unusual of all occurrences. Positioned over the North West shelf of Western Australia was a very solid looking formation which was again captured on weather satellite imagery.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oJjpcSRPKcs

full story and pics ...
http://ufobriefcase.net/2011/03/20/ufo-sighting-weather-radar-detects-ufo-bigger-than-belgium/

viking

Davidallany
21st March 2011, 11:20
The same event from a different spectator.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=buOJt32n2C4&feature=related
for some reason the video doesn't show.

Champion the Wonderhorse
21st March 2011, 11:42
We have lots of unexplained phenomena around the globe at the moment!! We'll see what the rest of the video looks like ...

Found this ....

UFO Sighting | Weather Radar Detects UFO Bigger than Belgium

Unusual formations have been appearing on government weather satellite imagery all over the world. Satellite Weather images over Europe have detected an enormous unidentified object that is larger than Belgium!
The key witness has recorded their observation in order to understand exactly what was seen. The video was uploaded onto YouTube with the following statement:

“Can somebody tell my what the heck is going on ?”

In recent years a number of similar formations have occurred around the world. The first time UFO Briefcase came across this type of phenomenon was the repeated incidents across Australia.

The most famous Australian incident resembles are large doughnut-like formation that was was positioned over the lower South-west Corner of Western Australia.

A similar appearance again happened on the 22nd January of 2010, however this time the ‘unknown object’ was positioned over the city of Melbourne. This particular formation almost resembles a giant CD with binary information.

Only one hour later and on the other side of the country, a new formation was observed that I consider to be the most unusual of all occurrences. Positioned over the North West shelf of Western Australia was a very solid looking formation which was again captured on weather satellite imagery.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oJjpcSRPKcs

full story and pics ...
http://ufobriefcase.net/2011/03/20/ufo-sighting-weather-radar-detects-ufo-bigger-than-belgium/

viking

Thats interesting viking,
On the 17/03/11 I posted a thread 'Can anyone see the skies'. I noticed as others had that over the last two or three days a thick dense and seemless clous/mist was covering the skies over England and that part of Europe where the anomaly is showing. It felt eerie and unnatural.
Too much of a coincidence.

Eric J (Viking)
21st March 2011, 12:17
Mmm that is weird Champs ... I remember the post...it was all ok in Hampshire though...

Very strange...wonder if there is a connection?

viking

tkh123186
25th March 2011, 16:42
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QCPXXe4vNk&feature=feedu

Looks pretty fake to me no matter how much I want it to be real... someone seems to be taking Eligael for a ride... or its so real that it looks fake! You decide!

=EDIT=

This thread was merged with the above one.similiar topics

Limor - Moderators team

SteveX
25th March 2011, 17:34
You will not get 4 minutes of your life back....dont bother. It's one of them where the kids making this vid need kicking in the nuts...for half an hour.

tkh123186
25th March 2011, 17:43
You will not get 4 minutes of your life back....dont bother. It's one of them where the kids making this vid need kicking in the nuts...for half an hour.

Yeah, its convenient that this is his first video that requires you to watch an AD first lol

mcaballero
25th March 2011, 20:10
It also looks fake to me, but I will analyze this on my favorite video editor and see what I get out of it.

One more thing. The monk+keychain is really cheesy. "02-1122012-T". Is that a reference to 21/12/2012?

Once again, I could be wrong.

mcaballero
25th March 2011, 20:17
Do you know what this reminds me of? For those who played Monkey Island 2, the voodoo swamp :-).

OTzqFB6KQSU

Lifebringer
25th March 2011, 20:55
Horse pucky if I ever saw a video b-movie like this. Did you see the key ring and the 2012 on the chessboard piece? wtf?

what is the purpose. Is it to sell online or something. This didn't even show the ufo. Pranksters and skepticist at work.

Grow up.

Davidallany
25th March 2011, 23:22
I tried to post the second video here without success so here is the link instead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2sXPAZ4XfM

str8thinker
26th March 2011, 00:51
Seems someone is playing the HAARP and he ain't angelic...

I recall the Jaime Maussan video on the Jerusalem UFO has appeared elsewhere on this forum - can't place it.

SteveX
26th March 2011, 00:51
EDIT..Big Style.

This is two threads merged. I was kicking off about deleted threads cause I couldn't find the original with the monk lol.

The first vid in this thread is a 30 second clip to supposedly back up the second vid of two indepents. The first 30 second vid is bogus and snipped from a 4 minute vid.

I ain't saying the incident wasn't real. I'm saying the first vid here is UTTER CRAP and no way backs up the other.

SHAME FOR EVEN POSTING A 30 SECOND SNIP OF CRAP

Eric J (Viking)
29th March 2011, 13:36
mmmmm!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpIAjgYTS8I&feature=feedlik

viking

Billy
29th March 2011, 15:04
mmmmm!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpIAjgYTS8I&feature=feedlik

viking

I was just going to post the New Video, Thank you Viking.

tkh123186
29th March 2011, 15:37
mmmmm!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpIAjgYTS8I&feature=feedlik

viking

I have no evidence obviously but that video looks like a fake to me, hope its not though.

Lord Sidious
29th March 2011, 16:09
The same event from a different spectator.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buOJt32n2C4
for some reason the video doesn't show.

That should make it work.


I tried to post the second video here without success so here is the link instead.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2sXPAZ4XfM

That one should be ok too.

Ouroboros
29th March 2011, 20:10
It is amazing what can be done with holographic technology these days is'nt it?

Gustav
9th May 2011, 07:12
Anyone know of new developments in this sighting?