UFO flyby Oregon 03/31/11

[mojo]

One of the most unique flyovers to date. The craft emits a strong energy pulse as it flies silently past the stars with a light display not yet seen.

ea_qxAjScus

[Illuminaughty]

Nice find. Def. not a plane.

I dont' know if you noticed or not, but check out the :49 second mark. You can see something else move under pretty quickly.

[58andfixed]

Missing a lot of items necessary for valid discernment.

Specificity details ... date, time, location, camera,etc...

Videographer, chain of custody, supporting witness (s).

Might be real, however with so much going on the planet and so much missing ... is this just a test ?

- 58

[mojo]

Hi 58andfixed,
Those are all valid and great questions and I have documentation (at least how much I care to reveal publicly) on my channel with a history of over 80 videos. I wish to let the video evidence speak for itself so you will rarely hear me talk during filming, except my last clip which even surprised me. You can see the results of that filming two nights ago on a thread I posted here. Keep asking the good questions though and you can also follow along if you wish. I have a link in my profile. Take care,
mojo
PS; I almost forgot, here is a different look at the video that was analyzed by a viewer and reveals information I didn't see.

uuS7BN1DlJ4&feature=watch_response

[Heartsong]

Where in Oregon was this filmed? There's been so much cloud cover and rain this month I'm surprised you could get this much.

[mojo]

Hi Heartsong,
I know we have had alot of wet weather in southern oregon and this was filmed on 3-31-11.

[Lord Sidious]

Nice find. Def. not a plane.

I dont' know if you noticed or not, but check out the :49 second mark. You can see something else move under pretty quickly.

That looked like ground lights on a hill or something as the object was moving past.

[58andfixed]

Hi Mojo.

The link inside the profile helps. It will take some time to view 80 clips, and I may not get around to them all.

For me, it's a process of discernment, having to make up for what the media and various other points of power don't provide - a balanced sense of accurate portrayal of reality.

Being so voracious, it's easier for me to toss the poor presentations, because there is so much else to 'chew on' on the Internet. And for me, there is a general sense of purpose.

Such a task leaves TIME as a more precious commodity than others typically assign to it.

Which is why although I find some value in information, I don't hold it as high in value especially if just once piece stands alone, and cannot be harmonized with other 'dots' of information.

It makes each 'dot' less critical, and the discernment of patterns more of value - and requires a mode of thinking that transcends the easiest to manipulate -- that of 'mere belief.'

While it is a wonderful clip, it's not a definitive one. Even it may indeed be a very profound one for you, I may judge less 'cream' and more 'noise.' This is not to reflect on your validity -- just my time and the value of the content of the clip to me, and others who rely on me for evidence to substantiate some one point or another.

So I can take some of what 'Charles' says, and leave large gobs behind. Looking for a 'guru' to 'provide me with the truth' isn't what I'm seeking.

HTH to explain my intent, position, philosophy and attitude. :)

- 58

[mojo]

Hello again 58andfixed,
I wish more people would assess things that way. It's much better to look at the whole picture rather then one piece of evidence. Also you are right about it not being definitive video. I don't think there will ever be a piece of definitive evidence that will pass everyone's muster. But, I try my best to bring authentic footage and let the camera speak most of the time, with the goal that each piece will bring us a little closure to disclosure. Thanks again for your honest efforts in review of said material.

...and Hi Lord Sidious I think what is seen are the stars as the object was moving through the night sky.

[58andfixed]

Thanks Mojo:

To endorse my points further, here's a clip from Sao Paulo Brazil. that while only slightly better in quality, day-time, etc.... offers a lot more, in that it aired on television [yes, yes, mass media] and some vetting is added already.

It's why I like a lot of Jaime Muassan's material. He interviews the videographer, the date, type of camera, any other sightings and a host of material that supports and endorses the discernment skills and removes the degree of doubt to the point of a peer-reviewed article for academia.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ol97-eoJ_w

1m 26s 10,606 views

Posted March 1, 2011

- 58

[mojo]

Hi 58,
I viewed the video earlier on youtube and was impressed although many were saying it was CGI, I believed it to be authentic based on similarities I have witnessed in my sighting. I have the utmost respect for Jaime and his work and one of the UFO researchers from California that is friends with him has shared my latest video with Jaime. Perhaps he will find it interesting and contact me. I will provide an update if that is the case. Thanks again....