PDA

View Full Version : Majestic 12 Group Special Operations Manual



Nasu
10th April 2011, 00:00
Hi all

I know 1954 is a while ago now, but in many ways one of the foundation stones to today's goings on, has anyone here either seen or gone through any Majestic 12 Group special Operations Manuals? I tried to upload a copy I have of a 1954 SOM as a PDF but the size is too great for the forum, its 25 pages long, I could email it to anyone who wants it, if you send me your email in a closed message I will not reveal it to others. Would be very interested in your thoughts. N

6764

str8thinker
10th April 2011, 01:16
Thanks Nasu. You can read them here:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_SOM1-01.htm


(from the same page)
Is it possible that this manual is real? Possible yes, but highly unlikely.

How about an alternate more likely possibility. An Air Force buck Sgt. with some intelligence training (but who probably fell asleep in technical intelligence class) and some friends cut and pasted this little number from a military packing manual. The buck Sgt. was too young to have been around in 1954 so there are so many anachronisms.

I have no proof, of course. Just a little possibility.....

Also find these somewhat charred versions here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/6404101/JFK-MJ12


Part 1: Original Scorched Carbon of CIA Memo Links
Government UFO Cover-Up and JFK Assassination
© 2008 by Linda Moulton Howe
“As far as I know, this ‘burned memo’ is the only document that I've ever heard anyone claim could be the authorization to kill President John F. Kennedy.”- Robert Wood, Ph.D., Physicist and Retired Aerospace Manager

To save you the trouble of dealing with Scribd.com I've appended this document to this post.

There is a large site on this topic here:
http://www.majesticdocuments.com/


I tried to upload a copy I have of a 1954 SOM as a PDF but the size is too great for the forum, its 25 pages long, I could email it to anyone who wants it.

You could zip it up and upload it to a free file hosting service such as http://ifile.it/ (one of my favorites) or RapidShare (ugh!) and make it available to us that way.

Cheers. :)

Nasu
10th April 2011, 02:26
Wow, thanks st8thinker for all your hard work. After a quick review I think my document is in its entirety, unlike these burned copies, that does not change much, but I think my one is easier to read. I am not sure how to zip it as you mentioned, so as to share, but would be happy to send it to you to do, if you are able? My email is nasumoony@gmail.com, fire me a mail (which I will keep private) and I will reply with the attachment. Many thanks again for you help and insight. N

Bill Ryan
10th April 2011, 03:31
--------

Here you go:


http://serpo.org/som101_part1.pdf
http://serpo.org/som101_part2.pdf

:)

Nasu
10th April 2011, 04:14
--------

Here you go:


http://serpo.org/som101_part1.pdf
http://serpo.org/som101_part2.pdf

:)

Thanks Bill

Any thoughts or insights? N

phimonic
10th April 2011, 04:52
really like these ! great post :) ty!

Lost Soul
10th April 2011, 06:14
Thanks Bill. I hate to sound like a whiner, but some of those images are barely legible.

phimonic
10th April 2011, 08:04
there are many interesting things to that i think -

on the very beginning : "...., but also the danger of having such advanced technology as has been recovered by the Air Force fall into the hands of ....." ^^
wondering about Contingency plan MJ1949_04P / 78 :) (page 10) - special unit OPNAC-BBS--01 employees were probably interesting to interview :)
page 11 - anyone knows about blue Lab WP-61, or Building 21 KB-88 ?

but it shows for what the government spends money,.. all those facilities, employees,.. and it's probably just a part of the icebergs tip

really nice to see them docs not only for a few seconds, as part of a documentary - to me they seem genuine,
and still , we won't see news about the disclosure-project on TV tonight, ..and the day goes on with more french fries and soda,...

it's somehow a pity, that most people do not want to know about those things, because they're afraid of whatever seems out of their realm. -

i mean there is so much out there which was really interesting news, and should be on every evening show - but they prefer to talk about dresses and hairstyles instead.

on ufo and secret-government topics it's very likely, that people get angry, when mentioned. they won't listen to this "crap" - on the other hand they love to watch the x-files and things like that, because then they know that it's faked, since it's only a tv series, -so nothing to worry ^^.
so tv-series about these issues ridicule the true stories somehow - (also they can make people interested in those topics -
it's like with many things - a two-sided sword (can u say this in english?^^), i guess.)
probably if avalon interview-stories sold as cartoon-series , everyone would talk about it, like harry potter or starwars :D

so even if they officially announced they had found something and that aliens exist etc. - would it really change a lot? - now after we have seen it all on our tv-screens more or less authentical, are probably using their technology in our computers and phones already,..
maybe we'd get officially new energy sources, etc. - but them would find a way to put a meter on it.

although have seen so many stories and interesting things about these topics i still do not really know what is behind all this,
but i know there can be vsible things in the sky that look exactely like the triangle-style UFO, since i've seen one once.
actually my grandmother seen it first - and said "what's that there in the sky - i was laughing - and said: " a BIRD - i mean what the ... should be in the sky except birds, planes and maybe helicopters. - but she said like : no! - there and pointed another direction (i was driving btw.) - then i looked and thought : "indeed what is that there in the sky" - metallic (reflective) - triangular - hard to tell distance. (had no details to it from what i remember - very plane faces. i have seen it clearly, but needed to take a glimpse on the road, not to loose track. when looked at he part of the sky again it was gone - but big part of sky visible, cloud and chemtrail-free. - at that moment just said to my granny that it was probably something built by the russians or US ,- who knows. -
but somehow it wasn't that big of a sensation.
still i have seen one :P , so i know there is something to it.

but better not to land on a foreign planet where the inhabitants have orders and procedures as outlined in this book ^^
maybe the aliens got a copy, too - now they're afraid of being kept in an EBE-storage-facility. ;) -
maybe this is the true reason they won't land public: Contingency plan MJ1949_04P / 78 ^^

Nasu
10th April 2011, 08:20
on ufo and secret-government topics it's very likely, that people get angry, when mentioned. they won't listen to this "crap" -

You are so right. I wonder if it is a brainwashing key word to make people tune out or turn off - "UFO", much like "conspiracy theory" or "NWO". It seems that if I could tell you your future and in it was a major calamity, but I had a solution, if I started my prophecy with either UFO or conspiracy theory, 99% of people would not listen, even if their lives depended on it. N

Magnus
10th April 2011, 12:37
Hi!

Thanks for providing this material!
I've now studied all the pages and i find the information very plausible, though i have a few remarks.
The first impression I got was that the fonts used, does not seem to match fonts currently available at that time.
The information itself seem logical and rings true, even though the absence of complexity astounds me.
Another point worth mentioning could be: Chapter 3 Recovery Operations - § 12. c (page 8) "downed satellites".
On what grounds could anybody justify a claim of a "downed satellite" in 1954? If this is valid it means that there existed a successful secret satellite project, but still what use could such a claim provide as the project was officially unknown?
My best guess is that most likely we are witnessing valid info mixed with a touch of disinfo in a fabricated structure.
Who would go through all this work to make a forgery!? Probably the (MJ-12) themselves i would guess, as to drip feed info into the disclosure movement.

/Magnus

Nasu
12th April 2011, 05:30
Hi!

Thanks for providing this material!
I've now studied all the pages and i find the information very plausible, though i have a few remarks.
The first impression I got was that the fonts used, does not seem to match fonts currently available at that time.
The information itself seem logical and rings true, even though the absence of complexity astounds me.
Another point worth mentioning could be: Chapter 3 Recovery Operations - § 12. c (page 8) "downed satellites".
On what grounds could anybody justify a claim of a "downed satellite" in 1954? If this is valid it means that there existed a successful secret satellite project, but still what use could such a claim provide as the project was officially unknown?
My best guess is that most likely we are witnessing valid info mixed with a touch of disinfo in a fabricated structure.
Who would go through all this work to make a forgery!? Probably the (MJ-12) themselves i would guess, as to drip feed info into the disclosure movement.

/Magnus

Good call Magnus

Not an expert on fonts, but take your word, the real elephant in the room is the satellite issue, as you say, what Value would it to use another top secret program, unless all that we know about the satellite programs and sputnik is crap as well... Could be.. Great points though Magnus. N