Jeffrey Steinberg: World Depopulation is Their Agenda - Alex Jones Tv 1/3

[ktlight]

The senior editor of the Executive Intelligence Review, Jeffrey Steinberg joins Alex today.

A Hypothetical calc

Population vs Landmass: Use a figure 6 billion men women & children in the world.
2.97 million square miles in Australia
break down =1 billion 900 million 800 thousand acres
break down = 7 billion 603 million 200 thousand 1/4 acre blocks

Hypothetically we could give every one in the world man woman and child a 1/4 acre block in Australia & still have half of our state of Queensland unoccupied and the rest of the world also unoccupied.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH10tXCMMSs


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISEsRIAi8M8


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoWccg2ewQo

[crosby]

i remember watching the jim mars interview on project camelot and he said that the entire world's population could also fit into the state of texas. i find this very interesting. thank you for your numerical breakdown. it should give many people a lot to think about.
warmest regards, corson

[Lord Sidious]

There is more to it than space.
There is food and pollution to consider too.
Another concept to consider is the often mentioned one of limiting how many children people in the ''first world'' have.
This is supposed to be about polution, energy consumption and it's production and the consumption of resources, the theory being that we use more and pollute more than others.
In the still developing parts of the world, they have a gazillion kids each and pollute without restraint, yet we don't mention that.
Where do you guys think the solution will be found for the issues, ignoring the control of these things, will we get that from bangladesh or Germany?
So limiting births here could limit the solution.
Maybe.

[ktlight]

There is more to it than space.
There is food and pollution to consider too.
Another concept to consider is the often mentioned one of limiting how many children people in the ''first world'' have.
This is supposed to be about polution, energy consumption and it's production and the consumption of resources, the theory being that we use more and pollute more than others.
In the still developing parts of the world, they have a gazillion kids each and pollute without restraint, yet we don't mention that.
Where do you guys think the solution will be found for the issues, ignoring the control of these things, will we get that from bangladesh or Germany?
So limiting births here could limit the solution.
Maybe.

If we all lived in spaces in Australia, say, I trust that common sense would prevail by example. Therefore, your considerations would be met by technology, as well as self-imposed rules (laws that make sense to all). I hope I'm not talking through my hat.

[Nyce555]

Thnks for posting. Good interview.

[Lord Sidious]

There is more to it than space.
There is food and pollution to consider too.
Another concept to consider is the often mentioned one of limiting how many children people in the ''first world'' have.
This is supposed to be about polution, energy consumption and it's production and the consumption of resources, the theory being that we use more and pollute more than others.
In the still developing parts of the world, they have a gazillion kids each and pollute without restraint, yet we don't mention that.
Where do you guys think the solution will be found for the issues, ignoring the control of these things, will we get that from bangladesh or Germany?
So limiting births here could limit the solution.
Maybe.

If we all lived in spaces in Australia, say, I trust that common sense would prevail by example. Therefore, your considerations would be met by technology, as well as self-imposed rules (laws that make sense to all). I hope I'm not talking through my hat.

It depends.
What colour is your hat?
As for living in Aus, if only you avalonuggets knew what it was like in the bush.

[ceetee9]

There is more to it than space.
There is food and pollution to consider too.
Another concept to consider is the often mentioned one of limiting how many children people in the ''first world'' have.
This is supposed to be about polution, energy consumption and it's production and the consumption of resources, the theory being that we use more and pollute more than others.
In the still developing parts of the world, they have a gazillion kids each and pollute without restraint, yet we don't mention that.
Where do you guys think the solution will be found for the issues, ignoring the control of these things, will we get that from bangladesh or Germany?
So limiting births here could limit the solution.
Maybe.
If we all lived in spaces in Australia, say, I trust that common sense would prevail by example. Therefore, your considerations would be met by technology, as well as self-imposed rules (laws that make sense to all). I hope I'm not talking through my hat.
Well common sense hasn't seemed to prevail in Ethiopia, Somalia, Nigeria, and other countries where their people live in abject poverty and are literally starving to death. Earth has finite space, water, air, and natural resources and while we can argue over what the "optimal number" of people are for this planet there is no question that there is some finite number of people the planet can reasonably and comfortably sustain above which the quality of life will rapidly deteriorate. I'm pretty confident God didn't want us to check our brains at the door when he said "Be fruitful and multiply..."

[wynderer]

i learned an interesting [to me, anyway] fact while reading 'Rebels Against the Future' about the Luddites :

Human population always increases when the humans are herded into cities , as happened during the 'Industrial Revolution', when entire villages were forced out of their self-sustaining cottage industries way of life, & forced into working in hellish factories -- the same thing happened in Africa, when money & taxes were forced on the people, & the men were herded off to the mines

perhaps because city living is out of balance w/Mother Nature, the birth rate soars when the people are forced to live [usually in poverty & squalor] in cities

this is the first time in this round of recorded human history that more people live in cities than in the country

Stalin observed that it is easier to control the people in a city than in rural areas

[Lord Sidious]

i learned an interesting [to me, anyway] fact while reading 'Rebels Against the Future' about the Luddites :

Human population always increases when the humans are herded into cities , as happened during the 'Industrial Revolution', when entire villages were forced out of their self-sustaining cottage industries way of life, & forced into working in hellish factories -- the same thing happened in Africa, when money & taxes were forced on the people, & the men were herded off to the mines

perhaps because city living is out of balance w/Mother Nature, the birth rate soars when the people are forced to live [usually in poverty & squalor] in cities

this is the first time in this round of recorded human history that more people live in cities than in the country

Stalin observed that it is easier to control the people in a city than in rural areas

That last sentence is one that came to mind when I saw the last zeitcrap film.