The sinking of Japan 5 years before the March 11 earthquake

[Eric J (Viking)]

TOKYO -This 2006 Japanese disaster movie may be the future fate of Japan. The similarities between what happens in the movie and what happened after the March 11, 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami (東日本大震災, Higashi Nihon Daishinsai, literally “Eastern Japan Great Earthquake Disaster”) is eerie. The movie synopsis reads: In the aftermath of a major earthquake under Suraga Bay, Misaki (a young girl) and Toshiro (a pilot of a deep sea submarine) are rescued from a ruined city street just as leaking gasoline ignites. Reiko Abe arrives just in time, lowered from a helicopter. Scientists predict that Japan will sink within 40 years, due to subduction of a tectonic plate to the west. However, Dr. Tadokoro, who leads an oceanic scientific team that includes Toshiro, calculates that this will happen far sooner, in only 338.54 days. He presents his findings to Prime Minister Yamamoto who decides to create a new department for impending disaster relief assigning Saoro Takamori to cover the new duties, since of all his ministers she will take it seriously but also bring heart to the process.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjTw9qaiE5w&feature=player_embedded

As further earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanic eruptions devastate Japan, the government pleads with other countries to take refugees. Yamamoto flies to China to negotiate relocations there, but his plane is destroyed by a volcanic eruption. Saoro fills the resulting vacuum in leadership and decides that Dr. Tadokoros plan to blow holes in the disintegrating tectonic tectonic plate is the best remaining hope to not only save the people, but what remains of the country itself. Ironically it was her career that hastened their divorce 20 years earlier. Misaki becomes orphaned following her mothers death from earthquake injuries, and bonds with Reiko who was similarly rescued from, but orphaned by the Kobe quake. Toshiro is offered a job in England and wants Reiko and Misaki to come with him, but Reiko feels bound to help others and refuses to leave. Fellow submarine pilot Shinji Yuki also turns down Toshiros offer to work with him in England. Drillships place massive explosives deep in the crust, but the detonator is not placed properly and Yuki dies attempting to place it by submarine.

http://www.ionlinemovie.com/pic/uploadimg/2010-11/201011172020995197.jpg

http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/
~~~~~~~~

The question I ask is....

I wonder how much of this was fed into the Japanese Concsiousness???

Food for thought hey!!

viking

[Odah]

just because some real life events mimic disaster porn.. doesn't mean it will happen in reality.

[Eric J (Viking)]

just because some real life events mimic disaster porn.. doesn't mean it will happen in reality.

Sorry!!

Half the stuff on the movie has already happened!!

viking

[truthseekerdan]

just because some real life events mimic disaster porn.. doesn't mean it will happen in reality.

Better pray it wont happen in your reality... :pray:

[Arrowwind]

just because some real life events mimic disaster porn.. doesn't mean it will happen in reality.

No It certainly does not.... but looking at the signs, and looking at the geology indicates that the probablity certainly exists.

Unlike what is currently happening, this film seems to directly acknowledge and focus energy on helping the people to evacuate rather than residing in denial (certainly they have endeavored not to give accurate information to the people of japan regarding fallout and the risks. was this merely denial or a darker agenda? who knows?)... and the governemnt in this film chose someone with "heart" to facilitate the process of evacuation. (I haven't seen the moving, just going by what was put up here)

My information tells me that in Atlantean times the people were warned.. some listened and migrated. Others did not. But we should not judge which path is right or wrong.. but it is our moral responsibilty to signal the warning bell loundly and clearly so all may hear and then have all the information to make the best decision for themselves and their family.

these warnings are not coming from whimsical fantasy... there is real geological changes going on, and Japan is being pounded by earth changes repeatedly and daily since March 11.

It is not wrong to choose a fatal path or to just stay and anticpate the best outcome but it is best that each individual be given the opportunity to weigh things for themselves and act according to their own particular karmic or dharmic journey..

It is wrong not to share information based on fear to do so, in like you might be wrong or you might be right and hence have to content witht the mass migrations that result... or in desire to manipulate and control and to direct information so the masses perrish.

Certainly the current warnings that are coming out are not based on fantasy. Something is really happening over there.

[jackovesk]

Japan earthquake tsunami predicted by Alex Collier in 1995...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZgG9hU07ps

[Odah]

YOu might think i am nieve in not believe that japan is sinking... But i just see a tsunami.. Which by the way Is the japanees word for these ways.. cause they have experience getting hit by them. does not equate to japan sinking.. When a full city in japan goes under the ocean and stays under the ocean .. If indeed japan is going to sink or parts of it are going to sink.. those with the intuition to get out will get out . ANd those who have choses on a soul level to sink with japan will sink with japan.

So please escuse me if when a good chunk of people on this board think it is all do to harrp this happened and another group are saying omg japan is really sinking. I will sit here and think othere wise.. yes there will be more earthquakes and a lot more volcanic activity around the world..

the shifts that will happen in the world for such activty that would cause japan to sink .. would really mean there is no safe place to hide .

[Etherios]

erm they have already anounced a 8 feet raise in sea lvl and some feet movement to the east... you should look it up ...

[Hervé]

Well, it seems that propaganda is working well especially when kept unconscious.

Just my opinion:


Actually, the sinking of Japan wouldn't happen from the subduction of the Pacific plate underneath it. That mechanism is considered the main mountain building one and not one of sea or ocean generation.

About the only way Japan could find itself under water permanently would be due to a physical pole shift where Japan would find itself under the tropical/equatorial water bulge; or else punched into oblivion with a meteorite.

My think on the matter is that what E. Cayce saw was the tsunami. When one has watched the many videos of the tsunami from a limited perspective, one cannot tell whether the land sunk or the ocean rose. The end result is the same: Land flooded in the blink of an eye. That's what's left imprinted in people's mind. Very few videos let the viewers see the water receding back.

¤=[Post Update]=¤


erm they have already anounced a 8 feet raise in sea lvl and some feet movement to the east... you should look it up ...

Hi Etherios!

Any data on that 8' coastal change? Source?

[Etherios]

[/COLOR]
erm they have already anounced a 8 feet raise in sea lvl and some feet movement to the east... you should look it up ...

Hi Etherios!

Any data on that 8' coastal change? Source?[/QUOTE]



Here :-P CNN news (http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/12/japan.earthquake.tsunami.earth/index.html?hpt=P1&iref=NS1)

i cant seem to find atm the sea lvl change ... but i am sure i heard it on the news we got on the first days...

[Patrikas]

[QUOTE=Amzer Zo;196825]Well, it seems that propaganda is working well especially when kept unconscious.

Just my opinion:

[QUOTE=Amzer Zo;189123]Actually, the sinking of Japan wouldn't happen from the subduction of the Pacific plate underneath it. That mechanism is considered the main mountain building one and not one of sea or ocean generation.

About the only way Japan could find itself under water permanently would be due to a physical pole shift where Japan would find itself under the tropical/equatorial water bulge; or else punched into oblivion with a meteorite.

My think on the matter is that what E. Cayce saw was the tsunami.
Hi heres some text form Cayce with regards to japan

Edgar Cayce:

The first sign of this change in the Earth's core would be the "breaking up of some conditions" in the South Pacific and "sinking or rising" in the Mediterranean or Etna area. Cayce forecast that New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco would be destroyed. He said that (first) "the greater portion of Japan must go into the sea" at this time, and that northern Europe would be "changed as in the twinkling of an eye." In 1941, Cayce predicted that lands would appear in the Atlantic and the Pacific in the coming years, and that "the coastline now of many a land will be the bed of the ocean. Even many of the battlefields of (1941) will be ocean, will be the sea, the bays, the lands over which the new order will carry on their trade as with one another."

[Odah]

there is a difference in island moveing 8 feets in one direction which i knew happened.. and them sinking 8 feet which i have not seen anything on.. now yes more big quakes will cause the landfill areas of japan subduct and be reclamied by the see ..but the event that would cause entire japanees mountains to sink. there is no place to hide from that.. you could move the people in jappan to china.. then you would have to move everyone on the coasts of china inland because the tsunamis would just ravage the coasts all around the pacific.

So there is no place to hide if these things really do happen .. and the only thing you will do by getting everyone think they may happen is cause mass fear. such a thing would be the sign of a crustal displacment. and most of the people on earth would not survive such an event.

[An Cailleach]

Here is a video from Dutchsinse's channel on youtube. His analysis of the earthquake patterns seems to give weight to the theory that Japan may 'sink'.

WPm8NJK8SgA

[Hervé]

Here is a video from Dutchsinse's channel on youtube. His analysis of the earthquake patterns seems to give weight to the theory that Japan may 'sink'.

Would have happened already, have a look at the pummeling of Japan's East Coast:

http://www.japanquakemap.com/#

[Hervé]

Here :-P CNN news (http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/12/japan.earthquake.tsunami.earth/index.html?hpt=P1&iref=NS1)



CNN... eh?

The shift they are talking about is the horizontal displacement towards Korea (mountain building process). Not a vertical component.

The change in the coast line is from the erosion caused by the tsunami in and out.

[Patrikas]

While it,s definatley true as we all know and see there are physical earth shifts associated with this time its vitally important to remember that the "major" shifts are shifts in consciousness ..blessins

[Yoda]

just because some real life events mimic disaster porn.. doesn't mean it will happen in reality.

Sorry!!

Half the stuff on the movie has already happened!!

viking

This sounds like some official warning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BC5axgP41Fg

Pierre

[Arrowwind]

Here is a video from Dutchsinse's channel on youtube. His analysis of the earthquake patterns seems to give weight to the theory that Japan may 'sink'.

Would have happened already, have a look at the pummeling of Japan's East Coast:

http://www.japanquakemap.com/#

I dont know how you can say it would have already happened. We seem to be waiting to see if there is a staw that will break the camel's back...

Shifting to the side or shifting downward is not the issue.... the issue is over 900 quakes now... We did not have 900 quakes in my area.. it only took one to drop 12 feet... you can go and look and see where the earth had been along the mountain side and where it is no longer.

It will all depend on the structure of the ridge Japan resides on, how pourous it is and how deep it all goes, which I am assuming are unknown factors .... there are many variables to consider... but the one that is screaming at me is what seems like perpetual cracking going on.. over and over day in and day out since March 11.

We don't know but it looks ominious.

If it does fully go down lets hope it goes down far enough to fully encase all the nuclear plants Japan has in the affected area under sufficient debris so it is not all released into the oceans uncontained... I was told Japan has 60 of them. Im guessing half are likely in northern Japan. If it does not fully go down but say only 10 or 15 or 20 feet how will the planet possibly contend with the nuclear disasters that will present?

[Arrowwind]

[This sounds like some official warning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BC5axgP41Fg

Pierre

There you have it, a five meter change in sea level in some areas. thats 16 feet, guys, nothing to snuff at. So thats at least confirmed.. sinking has been going on.

[Odah]

Abuse of logic.. 5 meter change in sea level = land sinking 5 meters .. hell in some places there was a 30 meter change in see level .. didn't meant those places sank 30 meters before the tsunami hit. This report is prior to the big tsunami's hitting .

for a tsunami to hit land the sea level first has to rise quite a bit .. i am sure that if parts of the coast of japan sunk 20 feet under the osean there would have been quite a few interesting report.. The earthquake was so bad this town is now under the ocean.

so again during and earthquake water gets pushed up and then sent off in many directions ..so that would be why the sea level rose five meters . then when it gets closer to shore it gets pushed up even higher.

So until you post you tube videos of sections of cities submerges under 10-20 feet of water .. which you should be able to find if they are there. then i will take the the sea level change as the normal part of a tsunami

[Hervé]

I dont know how you can say it would have already happened. We seem to be waiting to see if there is a staw that will break the camel's back...
Shifting to the side or shifting downward is not the issue.... the issue is over 900 quakes now... We did not have 900 quakes in my area.. it only took one to drop 12 feet... you can go and look and see where the earth had been along the mountain side and where it is no longer.

It's from the model Dutchsinse uses of flatening bubbles. With the 900+ EQs which the area was pummeled with, I don't think there would be many bubbles left unpoked (again check out http://www.japanquakemap.com/# ).

Regarding your 12' displacement, if that's from California and the San Andrea's fault zone; the latter is subvertical and would reflect a vertical relative component, i.e. either one side dropped, the other was uplifted or the whole thing got incrementally dropped or uplifted. I have no data on the absolute displacement.

Hope this helps?

[Yoda]

Abuse of logic.. 5 meter change in sea level = land sinking 5 meters .. hell in some places there was a 30 meter change in see level .. didn't meant those places sank 30 meters before the tsunami hit. This report is prior to the big tsunami's hitting .

for a tsunami to hit land the sea level first has to rise quite a bit .. i am sure that if parts of the coast of japan sunk 20 feet under the osean there would have been quite a few interesting report.. The earthquake was so bad this town is now under the ocean.

so again during and earthquake water gets pushed up and then sent off in many directions ..so that would be why the sea level rose five meters . then when it gets closer to shore it gets pushed up even higher.

So until you post you tube videos of sections of cities submerges under 10-20 feet of water .. which you should be able to find if they are there. then i will take the the sea level change as the normal part of a tsunami

Well, I guess NHK must have made a freudian slip, when they explained that the high tide markers had to be moved. Not to worry, the water will come in slower than the tsunamy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLD40G90em4&feature=related

Pierre

[Odah]

why i am so stubborn on this is that last week people on this board where trying to get me to believe that the quake was cause by an ancient sumerian super device that we invade iraq to steal from them . people have been claiming haarp was involved. this whole time .. Now your trying to say japan is sinking . when even after a 9.0 earthquake there is no sign of .

I am more worried about what will happen when the activity shifts from the west side of the pacific plate to the east side of the pacific plate.. which should happen.

[Hervé]

Well, I guess NHK must have made a freudian slip, when they explained that the high tide markers had to be moved. Not to worry, the water will come in slower than the tsunamy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLD40G90em4&feature=related

Pierre

Hi Pierre!

What I got from the video is a warning for a high-tide. Fails to mention if the flood warning is for reclaimed low lands now unprotected due to jetties and tsunami walls currently in a bad state of disrepair.

I would love to get my hands on absolute data... would you have any?

Thx

[Odah]

Ok yoda .. I will admit that there is probably some drop in sea level of earthquake hit areas especially areas that where built on landfill. whic would be expected. but no sign of the entire island sinking.

If you will Entertain the thought thet the warning of a 5 meter change in sea level after the earthquake .. was part of the tsunami warning system. and not an alert that some city had suddenly dropped 5 meters below see level. this is the information the nhk reporters are trained to broadcast.

% meter change in sea level = big tsunami comming people get to higher ground

[Yoda]

Well, I guess NHK must have made a freudian slip, when they explained that the high tide markers had to be moved. Not to worry, the water will come in slower than the tsunamy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLD40G90em4&feature=related

Pierre

Hi Pierre!

What I got from the video is a warning for a high-tide. Fails to mention if the flood warning is for reclaimed low lands now unprotected due to jetties and tsunami walls currently in a bad state of disrepair.

I would love to get my hands on absolute data... would you have any?

Thx

I don't read Japanese, but the closest I can get, is reference to the Japanese Geographical Survey Institute. They admit that the Japanese archipelago has moved 5.3 meters closer to the trench, and has sunk by 1.2 meters.

http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/part-of-the-earthquake-caused

Pierre

[Hervé]

I don't read Japanese, but the closest I can get, is reference to the Japanese Geographical Survey Institute. They admit that the Japanese archipelago has moved 5.3 meters closer to the trench, and has sunk by 1.2 meters.

http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/part-of-the-earthquake-caused

Pierre

Thank you for the info.

However, I am gona have to take it with a boulder of salt:



This site is very closely associated with: http://www.zetatalk.com/ (http://www.zetatalk.com/) which contains a vast amount of information being relayed by the Zetas in answer to questions posed to their emissary, Nancy Lieder (http://poleshift.ning.com/profile/NancyLieder). The "Zetas" are a alien species, originating from the zeta reticuli star system, and inform mankind about the coming earth changes. http://www.zetatalk.com/nancybio.htm (http://www.zetatalk.com/nancybio.htm)


... taken from their main page.

Back on the hunt for verifiable data...

[Arrowwind]

[This sounds like some official warning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BC5axgP41Fg

Pierre

There you have it, a five meter change in sea level in some areas. thats 16 feet, guys, nothing to snuff at. So thats at least confirmed.. sinking has been going on.


Seems I did not listen carefully enough to this video... sorry
this 5 meter change was related to tsunami effect

[Hughe]

If the ruling class of Japan are so caught-up or under control of monstrous TPTB, many Japanese will perish. 100 million is right there.

I'm sorry to say this that Japan will sink soon or later. The question is WHEN.
I only hope humanity will be united before it happens and save most of Japanese when it will occur. China, Korea, Russia are the neighbor countries. Few hours by ship, 5-10 minutes by air travel distance from Korea.

The condition of land sink is simple. When the land matches to water level, it's submerged under water.

[Arrowwind]

I dont know how you can say it would have already happened. We seem to be waiting to see if there is a staw that will break the camel's back...
Shifting to the side or shifting downward is not the issue.... the issue is over 900 quakes now... We did not have 900 quakes in my area.. it only took one to drop 12 feet... you can go and look and see where the earth had been along the mountain side and where it is no longer.

It's from the model Dutchsinse uses of flatening bubbles. With the 900+ EQs which the area was pummeled with, I don't think there would be many bubbles left unpoked (again check out http://www.japanquakemap.com/# ).

Regarding your 12' displacement, if that's from California and the San Andrea's fault zone; the latter is subvertical and would reflect a vertical relative component, i.e. either one side dropped, the other was uplifted or the whole thing got incrementally dropped or uplifted. I have no data on the absolute displacement.

Hope this helps?

This was in Idaho in the 80's sometime... straight down it went. YOu can walk the area and see it for yourself.. come on out. You can stay at my place.

[Odah]

i post this video i saw it on this board or another one a month ago... now here is the thing. Like i say.. i do see the probability that recalimed land ..land built on landfill would sink with earthquakes and more earthquakes. i am still in doubt if any place in the world would be safe if there was activity going on that could sink japan.

Here is the vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6jLHjcRwDU

So evacuating 150 million people based off a few scatterd prophasies seems a little extreme .

Do we start evacuating californie and the the entire middle of the us along the new madrid fault because we have profasies that it will becoem an inland sea ?

[Hervé]

This was in Idaho in the 80's sometime... straight down it went. YOu can walk the area and see it for yourself.. come on out. You can stay at my place.



Oooops... that would make for quite a wide San Andrea's fault zone... the whole Cascade, etc...

Are you sure it's not the mountain that went up? Early ascension? :lol:

Thank you for the invite! :yo:

[Hervé]

All right, into better correlated data:

From: http://www.zmescience.com/other/japan-earthquake-tsunami-explained-2129863/



If you’re looking for an easy to understand scientific explanation about the formation of the devastating quake and tsunami that devastated Japan this Friday, you’d better read Dr. John Ebel‘s theory from below, Professor of geophysics and director of Weston Observatory of Boston College.
“We had an earthquake caused by the Pacific Ocean plate sliding under the Asian plate and as it slides under the Asian plate is pushed up… Emphasis mine.

From: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110316152756.htm


By analysing over 500 GPS stations, the GFZ scientists Rongjiang Wang and Thomas Walter have found that horizontal displacements of up to five meters in an eastern direction occurred at the east coast of Japan. The cause lies in the earthquake zone, i.e. at the contact interface of the Pacific plate with Japan. Computer simulations of this surface show that an offset of up to 25 meters occurred during the earthquake. Calculations of the GFZ modeling group headed by Stephan Sobolev even yielded a displacement of up to 27 meters and a vertical movement of seven meters. This caused an abrupt elevation in the deep sea, and thus triggered the tsunami. The images of the GPS displacement vectors and the computer simulations can also be found among the online material provided by the GFZ.


6839
(click on picture for larger view)

The right figure shows the slip of the Eurasian plate relative to the Pacific plate, inverted from the surface displacement data measured by more than 500 GPS stations, which are shown in the left figure. The max. horizontal and vertical GPS displacements are 5.24 m and 1.13 m, respectively. The correlation between the measured and modelled displacements is 99%. The earthquake magnitude (Mw) derived from the slip model is 8.9, in a good agreement with the seismological observation. The small red triangles in the right figure show the volcanoes. So far there is no indication for increased volcano activities.
picture: GFZ, Rongjiang Wang and Thomas Walter

Here is the modelling at the time of the jolt:


6840


The source of the earthquake, i.e. the relative displacement between the continental shelves during the quake, can be reconstructed using GPS measurements. If this is known, the vertical displacement on the sea floor can in turn be calculated, which in this case occured over an area about 500 km long and 100 km wide. This rise of the sea floor of up to 7 meters was the cause of the tsunami. Image: Andreas Hoechner, GFZ

What remains unclear to me is if the GPS derived displacements are permanent or an amplified jolt?

Back on data hunt...

[Arrowwind]

Do we start evacuating californie and the the entire middle of the us along the new madrid fault because we have profasies that it will becoem an inland sea ?

One must follow their gut. I evacuated myself from California in 78 for exactly this reason..and I have never regretted it. Most adults in Ca. are aware of the risk. they make the choices they make for a multitude of reasons.

and yes, I think most of us here realize that if Japan sinks, if it gets that bad it will be very bad in many many places.

[Odah]

we are really screwed if atlantis reemerges.. because i9 go with the theory that atlantis now lies under the ice of antactica ..hehe.. now if all that ice melts !!!

[Humble Janitor]

I think that people need to look at the hard data before drawing such "conclusions".

I do not see Japan sinking during my lifetime. I don't understand why people keep pushing that fear. Do they wish for this to happen?

[East Sun]

I am a big fan of Edgar Cayce who made predictions while in a deep trance back in the 30s, 40s.
He talked about Atlantis in detail and about things to come soon. He said that Japan would be covered by water. But he also mentioned California, NY City and other places.

If you are interested in this sort of prophesy you would be interested in what he has predicted.

[truthseekerdan]

Well, Cayce's predictions are fulfilled right in front of our eyes, even though they are a bit later in time than he predicted 'em.

[Patrikas]

we are really screwed if atlantis reemerges.. because i9 go with the theory that atlantis now lies under the ice of antactica ..hehe.. now if all that ice melts !!!

It would be very interesting indeed to see what is there at both poles;)

[Hervé]

All rigth, finally getting to real numbers and what they are actually related to.

68486847

"Displacement" has been Machiavelically mixed up by youtubers -- posters and googlers -- in all possible manners for doom and gloom. The above diagrams depict, for the first one -- right side, the relative motion of the blocks along the fault plane which is assumed subparallel to the subduction plane plunging westward (solid black arrows, top right in diagram below).


6844

The second, top right, diagram; gives the vertical uplift of the west compartment (6-7 meters at epicenter) and a slight downward tilt of that block near the coast.



As for the "sinking," and the flood warning in the coming high-tides, here are the measured data:


6845

That's 50 cm -- half a meter; but only in the Honshu coastal area.

Hence, no indications that japan, in its entirety, is "sinking."

But the island margin sure rose: 6-7 meters!

Additional data from: http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/News/2011_spring_tide.html

[Snowbird]

YOu might think i am nieve in not believe that japan is sinking... But i just see a tsunami.. Which by the way Is the japanees word for these ways.. cause they have experience getting hit by them. does not equate to japan sinking.. When a full city in japan goes under the ocean and stays under the ocean .. If indeed japan is going to sink or parts of it are going to sink.. those with the intuition to get out will get out . ANd those who have choses on a soul level to sink with japan will sink with japan.

So please escuse me if when a good chunk of people on this board think it is all do to harrp this happened and another group are saying omg japan is really sinking. I will sit here and think othere wise.. yes there will be more earthquakes and a lot more volcanic activity around the world..

the shifts that will happen in the world for such activty that would cause japan to sink .. would really mean there is no safe place to hide .

I'm not sure Odah if the people on this forum believe that the earthquakes are due to HAARP alone. What we know (below) is that there exists technology that can split the earth. And, we know that those who are bent on destroying life on this earth, have and hold that technology.

From the signs that have been detected in Japan, the quake and the resulting tsunami, were induced or promoted by this technology into a natural fault that has been unstable for a very long time. It appears that this massive quake was a combination of these two forces.

Nikola Tesla: A Biography

In his Manhattan lab, Tesla made the earth into an electric tuning fork. He managed to get a steam-driven oscillator to vibrate at the same frequency as the ground beneath him (like Ella Fitzgerald breaking the glass with her voice in those old Memorex commercials).

The result? An earthquake on all the surrounding city blocks. The buildings trembled, the windows broke, and the plaster fell off the walls.

Tesla contended that, in theory, the same principle could be used to destroy the Empire State Building or even possibly split the Earth in two. Tesla had accurately determined the resonant frequencies of the Earth almost 60 years before science could confirm his results.

http://www.stargazing.net/astroman/NTBio.html

[Siberia9]

Here is a video that instills a whole lot of confidence in the hollow magma tubes that the whole country is built on top of. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hfCN6k3YE&feature=email

[Hervé]

Here is a video that instills a whole lot of confidence in the hollow magma tubes that the whole country is built on top of. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hfCN6k3YE&feature=email

Hi Siberia,

Think a bit: if that were true and the bubbles popped, where would the people on the street find themselves?

Check out this thread for more infos:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?16641-Ground-moving-in-japan&p=178448&viewfull=1#post178448

PS: To date, there has been over 1000 bubble popping events (Earth quakes) in that very localized area since March 11,2011. Me think not many bubbles left to be pocked.

[Siberia9]

Sorry dude but I did not say anything about bubbles poping.

[Eric J (Viking)]

I still can't quite figure out if this is Haarp or natural?? ...

quote...
SOMETHING IS SERIOUSLY WRONG IN JAPAN..WATCH THIS COMPILATION OF RECENT FOOTAGE AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK..

JAPAN DISATERS IN 2006 ILLUMINATI MOVIE ALSO.. NO COIN-CIDENCE..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTqnAwsbfsI

viking

[Odah]

i saw much of this footage right after the quake.. do you notice the guy speaking english in the second video where he is talking about how he was on reclaimed land or land fill.. Yes reclaimed land is at risk of sinking and collapseing and the building sinking below see level..

But your showing me the same movie trailor that you showed a week or two ago.. and i am sure there would be people on the ground in japan asking these questions wondering if they are sinking into the ocean.. or just realizing they had a 9.0 quake and the ground does funny things during a 9.0 quake that last 3-5 minutes.

Granted a good chunk of that area is now not safe to live in do to radiation.. but sinking .. i still doubt it.. i am pretty sure a large island chain would take a while to sink.. and notice none of the"collapsing volacanic tubes " seem to be under japan but off shore.

P.s and vicing all that recent footage was basicaly shot during the quake .. again it last like 3 to 5 minutes a lot of people had time to run their cameras

[Odah]

Let me put it bluntly.

If japan sinks or shakes bad enough to come close to sinking. all of it's reactors will meltdown or at least oll of it's radiation will end up in the ocean.. and at that point there will be no place to hide.

[Hervé]

Me think the YouTube poster has a fearmongering agenda in order to collect hits on his compilation video. I find that totally disgusting.

Read or reread that post: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?18326-The-sinking-of-Japan-5-years-before-the-March-11-earthquake&p=197251&viewfull=1#post197251 no sinking from measured data.