PDA

View Full Version : Michael Harper or Stephen Ignatieff ?



Gaia
21st April 2011, 11:08
Canadians will still have to either vote for the Conservative Party or the Liberal Party. Admittedly, they are people who want to vote for the Bloc Quebecois, New Democratic Party or even the Green Party, but one thing is certain: The government will be Liberal or Conservative. In this case, only two men can become prime minister and unfortunately these two men serve the interests of an elite globalist unscrupulous.

As examples, it would be impossible to see Michael Ignatieff terminate the Partnership for security and prosperity of North America initiated by Paul Martin in 2005 and extended since then by Stephen Harper. It would also be impossible to see Harper Ignatieff or cancel the participation of Canada in the NAFTA again they are on the same wavelength. They shall be construed as in Laron fair when they support a military intervention in Afghanistan or a preventive war in Iraq under the pretext of cans. Both also want to establish a North American Union. Certainly they are a little different: Ignatieff is a radical globalist globalist while that Harper is a more moderate (Even very moderate). Harper is a shrewd politician and Ignatieff is frankly mediocre.

Look more ready the two main protagonists of the next election "Canadian Spectator"

Michael Ignatieff: Power, a family affair

Ignatieff is a member of one of the most influential families in Canadian history. His great grandfather was George Robert Parkin. Parkin, an imperialist, was a close friend of Cecil Rhodes who founded it with a secret society with the aim of unifying the world under the British Empire. Parkin moreover organize Rhodes Foundation which provides scholarships to study at Oxford and be well educated as the dream of Cecil Rhodes. Parkin's sister (Great aunt and Ignatieff;)) Alice Parkin, Vincent Massey to become married Alice Parkin Massey. George Robert Parkin and Vincent Massey were the most influential men of their time to Canada and was part of the powerful Anglo-American establishment. Michael's father, George Ignatieff, was awarded a Rhodes Scholarship and was also working in the cabinet of Lester B. Pearson, another notorious globalist.

Ignatieff for his work regularly to the Council on Foreign Relations and attended the International Council of Canada, global organizations that dictate the political agenda of North America and the world. He studied at Oxford University, Harvard, to eventually become a professor. It is extremely loan globalist establishment. A vote for him is a vote for the New World Order.

Stephen Harper: The Puppet of Brian Mulroney, un goglu comme on dit;)

Stephen Harper is not as clear links with the global network as is the case with Ignatieff. However, there is a man who has strongly advised Harper since he is the head of the Conservative Party: that man is Brian Mulroney. Indeed, Mulroney could easily be the true architect of the rebirth of the Conservative Party. Moreover, Harper told the Council on Foreign Relations in 2007 that Mulroney regularly advised on foreign policy. Brian Mulroney is probably one of the most powerful men in Canada. He sits on a ton of board such as Barrick Gold, Power Corporation and JP Morgan Chase along with David Rockefeller. This is a close friend of the Bush family and the Desmarais family. And as Stephen Harper said during the award of the prize to Mulroney "Greenest prime minister" (Prime Minister as green): "When Brian speaks, everybody listens. "

However, Harper cringe the inner circle of the Bilderberg group still refusing to adopt carbon taxes to combat climate change. Harper, who attend the 2003 meeting of the Bilderberg Group, is in fact climate skeptics. In the past, he describes the fees and scholarships carbon "Socialist plot" to destroy the economy. Therefore, ultimately, the elite globalist rather see Ignatieff (Pro carbon taxes) to lead the country.

And others ...

You tell me that there is also Gilles Duceppe of the Bloc Quebecois and Jack Layton of the NDP, why not Elizabeth May ! Anything !

Duceppe is a supposed Quebec sovereignty that I believe should be considered a traitor by the separatists in Quebec. The Bloc does not do much other than vote with the government and engage in petty political scandal. Somehow, the Bloc is complicit. Gilles Duceppe is also in favor of a North American Union, then Bye Bye Indépendance !

As for Layton and the NDP, they have relatively the same program the PLC, a little more left if this is the case, why not vote for that ! Elysabeth May is there to promote the carbon tax. She is a former Sierra Club, the club's VIP area Greenpeace.

I obviously suggests Canadians should vote for any of these parties. Who to vote for then ? Find someone you trust that you know of good faith and ask them to run as an independent. Then vote for him. Voila c'est cela la solution !

Have a good show everyone !
http://infodudecodeur.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/michael-harper.png?w=441&h=534

Lost Soul
21st April 2011, 11:27
No different from the United States. Vote either Republican or Democrat and you're voting for the same party.

toothpick
21st April 2011, 11:47
All Canadian famlies will be gathered this weekend for Easter Sunday supper coast to coast.
Any political famlies will be dicussing this election with great fervor.
I have no advice for these people.
The reality of the two frontrunners is there is no difference, they are both pretty much the same elitiests puppets.
I,m sorry, but I am truly down on politics lately.
Maybe they should have a "none of the above" slot to vote for on the ballet.
Watch-out then.
Now that, just might wake a few people up.

toothpick

crosby
21st April 2011, 22:44
it truly does make it difficult to choose one or the other. the phrase, opt for the dog with the least fleas, comes to mind. but fleas are fleas....... whether it be one or one million and one. the u.s. is no different. the political rhetoric may be slightly different, but in the end, they're on the same dog, chewing the same bone. i've decided that voting is not an option for me anymore. i've learned that presidents, as well as prime ministers, are not elected, they are selected. well before the final polls close. thank you for posting this thread, it keeps my ilk in order....... makes me want to bring out the flea spray and zap'um.
warmest regards, corson