PDA

View Full Version : Scientist says evil can be treated



ktlight
8th May 2011, 07:47
A Cambridge University scientist says evil is a lack of empathy which can be measured and monitored and is susceptible to education and treatment.


"I'm not satisfied with the term 'evil'," Reuters quoted Cambridge University psychology and psychiatry professor Simon Baron-Cohen as saying.

"We've inherited this word... and we use it to express our abhorrence when people do awful things, usually acts of cruelty, but I don't think it's anything more than another word for doing something bad,” he added, saying that “we need a new theory of human cruelty.”

In his recent book Zero Degrees of Empathy, Baron-Cohen suggests a rebranding of evil and defining it in terms of lack of empathy.

Director of the Autism Research Center at Cambridge defines empathy in two parts; as the drive to identify other people's thoughts and feelings, and the drive to respond appropriately to those thoughts and feelings.

According to Baron-Cohen, if people fully use their capability to empathize many conflicts in families and society will be resolved.

"If you think about conflict resolution at the moment, usually we are dependent on diplomatic channels, legal frameworks, or military methods,” he said.

“But all those things operate at a very abstract level and they don't seem to get us very far.

"Empathy is about two people -- two people meeting, getting to know each other and tuning in to what the other person is thinking and feeling."

One of the world's top experts in autism and developmental psychopathology, Baron-Cohen cites at least ten brain regions which make up what he calls the "empathy circuit."

When people hurt others, parts of that circuit are malfunctioning. He also sets out an "empathy spectrum" ranging from zero to six degrees of empathy, and an "empathy quotient" test, which ranks people along that spectrum.

Baron-Cohen says people are in the middle of the spectrum, with a few particularly attuned and highly empathetic people at the top end.

He says those who fall at the bottom end of the scale should not be labeled evil, but should rather be seen as sick or "disabled," who need to be helped with their empathy deficiency.

"I try to keep an open mind. I would never want to say a person is beyond help," he says. "Empathy is a skill like any other human skill -- and if you get a chance to practice, you can get better at it."

source
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/178720.html

Seikou-Kishi
8th May 2011, 08:06
I think a lack of empathy is more a disorder resulting from our 'separateness from the source', or, rather, the illusion of it. I think we empathise because on some level we share the experience. The agent and the patient -- the 'doer' and the 'do-ee' exist in a symbiotic relationship such that one is neither fully active nor fully passive.

Bill Ryan
8th May 2011, 08:14
I think a lack of empathy is more a disorder resulting from our 'separateness from the source', or, rather, the illusion of it. I think we empathise because on some level we share the experience. The agent and the patient -- the 'doer' and the 'do-ee' exist in a symbiotic relationship such that one is neither fully active nor fully passive.

Wonderful reply.

Yes, evil can be 'treated' - for sure - but (a) it's not always easy, and (b) there's often significant resistance (and other firewalls that need to be handled first).

noprophet
8th May 2011, 08:16
Time to bring the shaman back.

firstlook
8th May 2011, 08:18
You always fear what you dont understand.

ktlight
8th May 2011, 08:36
You always fear what you dont understand.

Until you learn that all past fears turn out to be nothing to be afraid of, and likewise all future fears.

Seikou-Kishi
8th May 2011, 09:04
I think with some people this lack of empathy, this 'evil', is in a strange way a comfort for them. To feel nothing at another's suffering, perhaps even schadenfreude, could be a defence mechanism against all the suffering in the world. Some might be disinclined to make the move from revelling in the suffering of others to empathising with it simply because, in a misguided way, it is better to revel than to suffer. "I have enough problems of my own without feeling yours too".

ktlight
8th May 2011, 09:25
I think with some people this lack of empathy, this 'evil', is in a strange way a comfort for them. To feel nothing at another's suffering, perhaps even schadenfreude, could be a defence mechanism against all the suffering in the world. Some might be disinclined to make the move from revelling in the suffering of others to empathising with it simply because, in a misguided way, it is better to revel than to suffer. "I have enough problems of my own without feeling yours too".

I read a book called 'The Chairman as God' which described that all empathy with humanity has to go before anyone can run anything. The chairman has to be completely devoid of feelings. He needs to be because he has to make company/corporate decisions.

Seikou-Kishi
8th May 2011, 09:34
I think with some people this lack of empathy, this 'evil', is in a strange way a comfort for them. To feel nothing at another's suffering, perhaps even schadenfreude, could be a defence mechanism against all the suffering in the world. Some might be disinclined to make the move from revelling in the suffering of others to empathising with it simply because, in a misguided way, it is better to revel than to suffer. "I have enough problems of my own without feeling yours too".

I read a book called 'The Chairman as God' which described that all empathy with humanity has to go before anyone can run anything. The chairman has to be completely devoid of feelings. He needs to be because he has to make company/corporate decisions.

That may very well be the current idea, that one mustn't let one's emotions and the dirty trivialities of humanity interfere with the sacrosanct business of corporate management, but I rather think that such a business model favours only corporate interests, while a manager/chairman, &c., who embraces those dirty trivialities will find them invaluable tools in creating an ethical business. It may be the received wisdom to sacrifice empathy at the altar of corporate management, but received wisdom is no wisdom at all.