PDA

View Full Version : Israel does not rule out strike on Iran



ktlight
9th May 2011, 06:50
After the former Mossad chief described striking Iran as a “foolish idea,” an Israeli security official says there is no solution but to attack Tehran if other options fail.


“An aerial attack against Iran's nuclear reactors would be foolish,” Meir Dagan said in a conference of senior faculty members at the Hebrew University in al-Quds (Jerusalem) on Friday

"Those who strike in Iran must realize that they may prompt a regional war, where missiles will be fired by Iran and by Hezbollah from Lebanon as well," the former Mossad chief said.

In reaction to Dagan's remarks, another former head of Mossad Dani Yatom said on Sunday that he personally would not rule out military action against Iran if all other actions are unsuccessful.

Israel's Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz also criticized Dagan's remarks as “unworthy,” adding that these comments did not take other options about Iran off the table.

Amid a standoff over Iran's nuclear program, both Tel Aviv and Washington have repeatedly threatened Tehran with the "option" of a military strike, based on the allegation that Iran's nuclear work may consist of a covert military agenda.

Earlier in the month, a source close to prominent Iraqi cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's group said Israeli jet fighters had conducted drills at a military base in Iraq in order to strike targets inside Iran, Press TV reported.

According to the report, a considerable number of Israeli warplanes, including F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22, and KC-10 jet fighters, were seen at Al Asad Airbase -- the second largest United States military airbase in Iraq located in Al Anbar Province.

Based on the report, Iraqi officials had not been notified about the drills conducted in collaboration with the US military.

Iran says its nuclear program is completely peaceful and within the framework of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, to which it is a signatory.

Iranian officials have warned that any act of aggression by the US and Israel against Iran's nuclear facilities would be firmly responded to and could result in a war that would spread beyond the Middle East.

source
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/178914.html

Lord Sidious
9th May 2011, 12:17
As I said the last time, KC 10 are tankers, only in use by the US air force.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_KC-10_Extender

Fred259
9th May 2011, 12:25
What say you Lord?

Israel or perhaps I should say the Zionist have been at this saber rattling for twenty years. I see it as more justification for its military industrial complex.

The Russians will be keeping the balance of peace. Iran and Russian are partners and neighbours in and around the Caspian Sea.

This is just for public consumption IMHO.

Lord Sidious
9th May 2011, 12:38
What say you Lord?

Israel or perhaps I should say the Zionist have been at this saber rattling for twenty years. I see it as more justification for its military industrial complex.

The Russians will be keeping the balance of peace. Iran and Russian are partners and neighbours in and around the Caspian Sea.

This is just for public consumption IMHO.

There are only 5.8 million jews in israel.
When there are 6, then things will happen.
So yes, this is just public nuggetry.

Mad Hatter
9th May 2011, 12:51
There are only 5.8 million jews in israel.
When there are 6, then things will happen.
So yes, this is just public nuggetry.

Lord Sidious, putting public nuggetry aside and since I believe the only dumb question is the one that isn't asked, could I prevail upon you to explain why 6 is the critical mass in this equation...

or is it that I deserve a good carroting for not being up to speed on this matter already. ;)

cheers

Lord Sidious
9th May 2011, 12:54
There are only 5.8 million jews in israel.
When there are 6, then things will happen.
So yes, this is just public nuggetry.

Lord Sidious, putting public nuggetry aside and since I believe the only dumb question is the one that isn't asked, could I prevail upon you to explain why 6 is the critical mass in this equation...

or is it that I deserve a good carroting for not being up to speed on this matter already. ;)

cheers

There is a section in leviticus that speaks of 6 million jews who will not answer a roll call before the messiah arrives.
AKA a holocaust.

Krullenjongen
9th May 2011, 13:57
There is a section in leviticus that speaks of 6 million jews who will not answer a roll call before the messiah arrives.
AKA a holocaust.

This is very interesting. I tried to look this up but i could not find anything about it in Leviticus.
Can you give me a chapter and/or verse number?


Question for ktlight.
Do you regard this iranian state news site as a reliable source?

Lord Sidious
9th May 2011, 14:45
There is a section in leviticus that speaks of 6 million jews who will not answer a roll call before the messiah arrives.
AKA a holocaust.

This is very interesting. I tried to look this up but i could not find anything about it in Leviticus.
Can you give me a chapter and/or verse number?


http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?12633-A-look-beneath-the-Holocaust-Propaganda-...&p=194626&viewfull=1#post194626
Read that.

ktlight
9th May 2011, 19:04
As I said the last time, KC 10 are tankers, only in use by the US air force.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_KC-10_Extender

Doesn't US defend Israel, who it is claimed, have them?

ktlight
9th May 2011, 19:10
Question for ktlight.
Do you regard this iranian state news site as a reliable source?

Insofar as any news source is concerned, I do think the source is as reliable as possible, especially since I saw it on David Icke's site before bringing it here.

Lord Sidious
9th May 2011, 19:23
As I said the last time, KC 10 are tankers, only in use by the US air force.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_KC-10_Extender

Doesn't US defend Israel, who it is claimed, have them?

Yes indeed it does, but they would be marked differently.
Possibly.
I know that US aircraft have carried the star of david in the past, specifically US recon aircraft were used in either the 67 war or the 73 one.
So, it is possible they are doing it again, but being ex armoured recon, I like to check out where people have made errors and then see if that affects their credibility.
Bit of difference between a tanker and a fighter too.

Krullenjongen
10th May 2011, 10:20
There is a section in leviticus that speaks of 6 million jews who will not answer a roll call before the messiah arrives.
AKA a holocaust.

This is very interesting. I tried to look this up but i could not find anything about it in Leviticus.
Can you give me a chapter and/or verse number?


http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?12633-A-look-beneath-the-Holocaust-Propaganda-...&p=194626&viewfull=1#post194626
Read that.

Thanks, interesting topic.
I'll look into this.

Krullenjongen
10th May 2011, 10:27
Question for ktlight.
Do you regard this iranian state news site as a reliable source?

Insofar as any news source is concerned, I do think the source is as reliable as possible, especially since I saw it on David Icke's site before bringing it here.

As far as i know this news site is an iranian state controlled news site.
This does not mean that the information given is all wrong and unusable but you can see by reading the articles that it has a certain bias and is promoting the iranian agenda. And i don't have to tell you that Iran doesn't like the western countries or Israel for that matter.

ktlight
10th May 2011, 10:47
As far as i know this news site is an iranian state controlled news site.
This does not mean that the information given is all wrong and unusable but you can see by reading the articles that it has a certain bias and is promoting the iranian agenda. And i don't have to tell you that Iran doesn't like the western countries or Israel for that matter.

I am sure you don't mean that they should not be heard, otherwise the bias goes the other way. Had you not read it, for instance, you would not have reached your conclusion.

And, is there a reason why Iran doesn't like Israel and western countries?

Lord Sidious
10th May 2011, 11:04
Question for ktlight.
Do you regard this iranian state news site as a reliable source?

Insofar as any news source is concerned, I do think the source is as reliable as possible, especially since I saw it on David Icke's site before bringing it here.

As far as i know this news site is an iranian state controlled news site.
This does not mean that the information given is all wrong and unusable but you can see by reading the articles that it has a certain bias and is promoting the iranian agenda. And i don't have to tell you that Iran doesn't like the western countries or Israel for that matter.

The opposite is also true.
The ''western'' or ''main stream'' media is controlled by the not so secret government.
I would say they both have their bias and the truth is somewhere in between.