John Hill aka Muad’Dib in court

[ktlight]

Starting that day, Muad’Dib will begin presenting an extensive compilation of evidence supporting His challenge that the “crown” has no jurisdiction to bring charges against Him (and by extension, many, many other people).

The potential ramifications of His trial make this the most far-reaching and important case in British history. For this reason, the State/“crown” have already proven by their own actions thus far, that they plan to act corruptly/unlawfully, behind the scenes, doing anything they can possibly come up with to stop their crimes and corruption from being exposed.

However, they are now criminals on the defensive, and if many thousands of people are looking on, it will be much more difficult for the “crown” to corrupt proceedings, or pass off fabricated “evidence”, which is why it is so absolutely imperative that every freedom-loving man, woman, and child attend and show their loud support.

Either Truth, Justice, and Liberty prevail, because people are willing to stand up and FIGHT for it, or we all go quietly and miserably into the very dark night that is being planned for us.

Listen to audio to know what this is about here
http://www.corbettreport.com/mp3/2011-04-29%20John%20Anthony%20Hill.mp3

John Hill created a movie about 7/7 and sent a copy of it the court and spent 150 days so far in custody for the "crime" of sending a DVD with the TRUTH to a courthouse of "justice". He risks spending a max of 20 years behind bars for this "crime".

[ktlight]

7/7 Ripple Effect

Verint Systems is the security firm that is responsible for the CCTV surveillance cameras, in the London Underground rail network, and it is an Israeli company, with approximately 1000 employees. This documentary explores why no CCTV footage of the four Muslims boarding the tube-trains has been released.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_MmqgdCWI

[John Parslow]

To those who would like to watch the film on Youtube here are the following links:

Part One: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY2NXPl625A

Part Two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E177j-bH9Vs

Part Three: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwLiaU-KStA

Part Four: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vBrSN9vuIs

Part Five: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycPqPTBcX10

Part Six: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlx1vZIlIv4

Part Seven: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_MmqgdCWI

Love to all. JP :cool:

[ktlight]

Day 1 of Trial -- Riding Roughshod Over The Truth


May 9th, 2011 -- London, England



Today was the first day of Muad'Dib's trial.

At this point, we will refrain from "naming names" of the various people working on behalf of the State, as there is still time for at least some of them to do the right thing, but when the trial concludes, it can be expected that a full and detailed account will be laid bare for the public.

As He warned people could happen during the recent radio interviews, the judiciary rode roughshod over as much of Muad'Dib's challenge as they could possibly get away with.

The very simplest account of today's events is that one judge (very corrupt), behind closed doors, approximately a month ago, ruled that the witness subpoenas Muad'Dib sought were not relevant to His case. This is of course a far-fetched lie, as the subpoenas being applied for were to get a material eye-witness and hard evidence, both the cornerstones of his defense, brought to court. Not only were these subpoena applications denied for clearly biased/corrupt reasons, but then the paperwork stating that the applications had been denied were "mistakenly" mailed to the wrong address, meaning that Muad'Dib never got them until actually traveling to the court.

Today, a separate judge was allocated for Muad'Dib's trial, and that judge refused to hear the evidence of why the witness summonses were required, stating that if another judge denied them, then they were denied. This man had an open opportunity to act impartially, and upstandingly, but unfortunately (for him and everyone else) chose not to.

Due to the nature of Muad'Dib's challenege, no judge in the Commonwealth can impartially rule on it. For this reason, Muad'Dib explained that it is essential for a jury to hear and decide upon the challenge. The judge rejected that and ruled on a matter he was directly involved in, which is contrary to all practice of law. It is a legal maxim that no man can judge in his own cause, but the judge today still forged ahead, meaning that this case is now ripe for appeal.

As Muad'Dib was denied the right to assemble a jury, this judge will now rule on whether the "crown" has jurisdiction to bring charges in this case.

That ruling is expected tomorrow morning.

If the judge rules in favour of Muad'Dib, the charges will be dropped. If the judge rules against Muad'Dib, the trial will continue as to whether Muad'Dib "attempted to pervert the course of 'justice' contrary to common law" by striving to keep three innocent men from going to jail.

[Davidallany]

My question here is how are they that certain of eminent attacks? Can they see the future?