PDA

View Full Version : Will parts of Japan & New Zealand sink into the Ocean?



Mulder
26th May 2011, 20:01
I was just listening to Kerry's radio show interview of Richard Pepper recorded on 20 April 2011. Kerry spoke of parts of Japan and New Zealand possibly sinking into the ocean.

This aroused my interest because I live in NZ. I've read Edgar Cayce's prophesy of Japan sinking, and another South African Boer War prophet "Seiner" saying Japan will be "destroyed" by earthquakes.

In terms of New Zealand, (this is along the lines of Miriam Delicado's work of interviewing indeginous people), there is a Maori legend of the North Island (where most people live & has big cities like Auckland & Wellington) being a "fish" and the south Island being the "canoe" that caught this fish (where Christchurch was just hit by earthquakes) and one day the North Island will sink into the ocean.

Can anyone with information on this reply with any information or sources on the possiblilty of parts of these countries sinking into the ocean.

Carmen
26th May 2011, 21:16
From my informational sources New Zealand will rise and eventually join with Australia. If you look at a google map and see the underwater shelves you will see the possibility of this. Scallions future map of the world has New Zealand huge!

Lord Sidious
26th May 2011, 22:23
Dunno, but I would go out now and buy up all the water wings and corner the market. :p

Morgaine
26th May 2011, 22:55
Well, I am in great doubt as to the likelihood of NZ either disappearing into the ocean, or joining up with Australia. A land mass that is part of the Ocean floor does not simply "move" and connect itself to another country..........this must be geographically, if not scientifically impossible!! I'm sure the rising of the oceans could mean certain low lying areas could disappear, but I would be very skeptical about the idea of NZ and/or Japan sinking/moving.

Lord Sidious
26th May 2011, 23:20
Well, I am in great doubt as to the likelihood of NZ either disappearing into the ocean, or joining up with Australia. A land mass that is part of the Ocean floor does not simply "move" and connect itself to another country..........this must be geographically, if not scientifically impossible!! I'm sure the rising of the oceans could mean certain low lying areas could disappear, but I would be very skeptical about the idea of NZ and/or Japan sinking/moving.

1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are already here!
NZ has already moved! :p

witchy1
26th May 2011, 23:31
Hi Morgaine, I think this refers to the polar shift or magnetic shift that is proposed to occur with Elenin / Nibiru arrival next December. In that, it is with the movement of earth off its current axis that will cause the oceans to slosh around and should that shift be permanent, then the oceans will permanently displace (have new homes.) There is much speculation who will have sea side homes and beach views after this time. NZ is purported in many reports to survive this with the water moving toward North Pole and the west USA/Canada as well as Japan. I live in Sydney and if I am to beleive things, it will go under (for a while anyway), but home in central north island NZ should be OK. This is ONLY if the NZ 3 of 7 largest volcanoes in the world do not activate (Taupo and the volcanic plateau ones.) That may be cause for some concern!

The rule of thumb currently is for all to get above 700ft sea level, as if it all transpires no where will be dry while this sloshing goes on.

Please correct me if I am wrong - I think I have it right???? If anyone has a link to a map showing where the proposed new sea levels may settle, I would be grateful

W

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hahahaha Sid, and you would be soooo lost without us. You LOVE us - c'mon admit it.

sanjosenian
26th May 2011, 23:39
Well, I am in great doubt as to the likelihood of NZ either disappearing into the ocean, or joining up with Australia. A land mass that is part of the Ocean floor does not simply "move" and connect itself to another country..........this must be geographically, if not scientifically impossible!! I'm sure the rising of the oceans could mean certain low lying areas could disappear, but I would be very skeptical about the idea of NZ and/or Japan sinking/moving.

1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are already here!
NZ has already moved! :p

ROFLMAO!!! You made my day, Lord Sidious. (Still sracking up!!)

Hervé
26th May 2011, 23:39
As far as japan is concerned, check this post and thread:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?18326-The-sinking-of-Japan-5-years-before-the-March-11-earthquake&p=197251&viewfull=1#post197251

(use of search function is not prohibited...)

As for NZ, that's a weird Earth's contraption... it's made up of two subduction zones plunging in opposite directions/dips (blue lines) joined through the Alpine transform fault zone (red line) and paralleled with an oceanic rift zone (dashed red-white line). Hence the probable way the North Island could "sink" would be through the opening of the rift zone in a similar way as is occurring in Africa's Rift Valley.


7754

Morgaine
26th May 2011, 23:42
Well, I am in great doubt as to the likelihood of NZ either disappearing into the ocean, or joining up with Australia. A land mass that is part of the Ocean floor does not simply "move" and connect itself to another country..........this must be geographically, if not scientifically impossible!! I'm sure the rising of the oceans could mean certain low lying areas could disappear, but I would be very skeptical about the idea of NZ and/or Japan sinking/moving.

1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are already here!
NZ has already moved! :p


Well somebody has to help Australia raise the national IQ..........................;)

oceanz
26th May 2011, 23:44
Back in 2009, NZ moved 30cm closer to Australia in a couple of seconds.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/22/new-zealand-closer-australia-quake


Earthquake brings New Zealand closer to AustraliaSouth Island moves 30cm towards Australia after 7.8-magnitude quake

Abhinav Ramnarayan guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 22 July 2009 13.36 BST

As countries with strong national identities, it can safely be said that Australia and New Zealand are worlds apart. However, a strong earthquake in the region has brought the fierce rivals closer – 30cm to be precise.

The 7.8-magnitude quake appears to have jolted the South Island and moved it towards Australia, the New Zealand Herald reported.

witchy1
26th May 2011, 23:48
Weird, because we are all joined under the sea! Its just the level of water in the Tassie that determines our closeness. (as I understand it)

Closeness to each other is not determined by land movement (unless a country grows some new land - like from volcanic eruptions). As I understand countries dont just float around on top of the water looking for places to park up. :-)

Hervé
26th May 2011, 23:55
Weird, because we are all joined under the sea! Its just the level of water in the Tassie that determines our closeness. (as I understand it)

Closeness to each other is not determined by land movement (unless a country grows some new land - like from volcanic eruptions). As I understand countries dont just float around on top of the water looking for places to park up. :-)

Correct. However "Plates" do float on the mantle and subduction zones are some sort of slippery slopes where plates creep onto each other....

witchy1
27th May 2011, 00:02
7755
7756
7758
7759

Here is a few possiblities (dont know why the pix are not coming out. They look fine on my edit, but just not getting onto the post ?) Mods???

Hervé
27th May 2011, 00:10
7755 7756 7758 7759

Here is a few possiblities (dont know why the pix are not coming out. They look fine on my edit, but just not getting onto the post ?) Mods???

All right witchy1... it's back to the sandbox fun... :wave:

Lord Sidious
27th May 2011, 00:23
Well, I am in great doubt as to the likelihood of NZ either disappearing into the ocean, or joining up with Australia. A land mass that is part of the Ocean floor does not simply "move" and connect itself to another country..........this must be geographically, if not scientifically impossible!! I'm sure the rising of the oceans could mean certain low lying areas could disappear, but I would be very skeptical about the idea of NZ and/or Japan sinking/moving.

1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are already here!
NZ has already moved! :p


Well somebody has to help Australia raise the national IQ..........................;)

Maybe so, but it ain't you wellington boot wearing, sheep scaring, funny accented kiwinuggets, let me tell ya.

nosgib
27th May 2011, 01:01
The knowledge I have is about Japan. And yes (told from my experience) it will be destroyed to the extent that it is virtually uninhabitable.
I have contacted the media and governments on this aspect to put a plebiscite to the people that could we accept (as refugees) people before a disaster rather than after it. using as proof what I had written and the cure.
But no. Anyway Japan will have no alternative than go to war by end 2013 simply to have inhabitable land for it's people.

Positive Vibe Merchant
27th May 2011, 01:07
Since this is a thread about NZ, and there are alot of aussies weighing in, could I get some info on Tasmania?

Safe to inhabit there, or is it going to head down the same path as NZ/Japan?

Lord Sidious
27th May 2011, 01:24
Since this is a thread about NZ, and there are alot of aussies weighing in, could I get some info on Tasmania?

Safe to inhabit there, or is it going to head down the same path as NZ/Japan?

Dunno, but I would exercise caution on two counts, one it is full of tasmanians and two, it is too close to victoria. :p

witchy1
27th May 2011, 01:38
could I get some info on Tasmania?

You might join the mainland of NZ - LOL

witchy1
27th May 2011, 01:42
7764Looks like Tassie is about to grow :-) 7761
7762

Lord Sidious
27th May 2011, 01:44
could I get some info on Tasmania?

You might join the mainland of NZ - LOL

That's worse, full of sheepshaggers. :p

witchy1
27th May 2011, 01:44
Hmmmmmpphhhh, you might note from the bottom map, that NZ looks to be a tad bit larger than OZ in 18 months time.

astrid
27th May 2011, 01:46
awwww come on your Lordship, Victoria isn't all that bad!!

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_yo9o5_GTNQM/S_dz4ScWuJI/AAAAAAAAIyU/UUd3cS0rGm4/s400/DSC_0182.JPG

DoubleHelix
27th May 2011, 01:51
Dunno, but I would exercise caution on two counts, one it is full of tasmanians and two, it is too close to victoria. :p

Rob your on fire mate! - haha

Lord Sidious
27th May 2011, 02:02
awwww come on your Lordship, Victoria isn't all that bad!!

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_yo9o5_GTNQM/S_dz4ScWuJI/AAAAAAAAIyU/UUd3cS0rGm4/s400/DSC_0182.JPG

I agree totally, Victoria is great.
It could use a total population transplant, but Victoria itself is great. :p

Isthatso
27th May 2011, 02:06
From my informational sources New Zealand will rise and eventually join with Australia. If you look at a google map and see the underwater shelves you will see the possibility of this. Scallions future map of the world has New Zealand huge!

Hey...take that back right now!

I'm not liking that idea - I like small perfectly formed land masses - I'm 5 mintues from the East Coast and an hour from the West. Long may that continue.

;)

¤=[Post Update]=¤



Well, I am in great doubt as to the likelihood of NZ either disappearing into the ocean, or joining up with Australia. A land mass that is part of the Ocean floor does not simply "move" and connect itself to another country..........this must be geographically, if not scientifically impossible!! I'm sure the rising of the oceans could mean certain low lying areas could disappear, but I would be very skeptical about the idea of NZ and/or Japan sinking/moving.

1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are already here!
NZ has already moved! :p

You guys love us......you know you do! :p

Cjay
27th May 2011, 02:12
Well somebody has to help Australia raise the national IQ..........................;)

Maybe so, but it ain't you wellington boot wearing, sheep scaring, funny accented kiwinuggets, let me tell ya.

Fush at chups for dinner - my place at sux o'clock

Lord Sidious
27th May 2011, 02:13
From my informational sources New Zealand will rise and eventually join with Australia. If you look at a google map and see the underwater shelves you will see the possibility of this. Scallions future map of the world has New Zealand huge!

Hey...take that back right now!

I'm not liking that idea - I like small perfectly formed land masses - I'm 5 mintues from the East Coast and an hour from the West. Long may that continue.

;)

¤=[Post Update]=¤



Well, I am in great doubt as to the likelihood of NZ either disappearing into the ocean, or joining up with Australia. A land mass that is part of the Ocean floor does not simply "move" and connect itself to another country..........this must be geographically, if not scientifically impossible!! I'm sure the rising of the oceans could mean certain low lying areas could disappear, but I would be very skeptical about the idea of NZ and/or Japan sinking/moving.

1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are already here!
NZ has already moved! :p

You guys love us......you know you do! :p

Yeah, but our sheep are still conducting a referendum on whether they like you or not.
Our lamb products have never tasted the same since you lot got here.

Cjay
27th May 2011, 02:18
could I get some info on Tasmania?

You might join the mainland of NZ - LOL

That's worse, full of sheepshaggers. :p

A friend proudly showed me two boutique beers he received as gifts for his 60th birthday (he's a lot older than me :p)... one beer was called Old Fart's, the other was Sheepshaggers :party:

Cjay
27th May 2011, 02:22
You guys love us......you know you do! :p

Yes we do. Come here you big boof head. Group hug.

Isthatso
27th May 2011, 02:23
Well somebody has to help Australia raise the national IQ..........................;)

Maybe so, but it ain't you wellington boot wearing, sheep scaring, funny accented kiwinuggets, let me tell ya.

Fush at chups for dinner - my place at sux o'clock

Nah.....that's 'sex' o'clock to you 'mate'...... :behindsofa:

Positive Vibe Merchant
27th May 2011, 02:35
awwww come on your Lordship, Victoria isn't all that bad!!

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_yo9o5_GTNQM/S_dz4ScWuJI/AAAAAAAAIyU/UUd3cS0rGm4/s400/DSC_0182.JPG

I agree totally, Victoria is great.
It could use a total population transplant, but Victoria itself is great. :p

Ease up LS!

Not complete lol
PVM

Carmen
27th May 2011, 06:10
Naa Cjay In Aus It's "Feesh and Cheeps for dinner at Sex oclock!!!! What fun, we could take the piss out of each other all night. After all we're quite practiced!!!LOL

perfectresonance
27th May 2011, 07:38
1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are already here!
NZ has already moved! :p

"New Zealanders who emigrate to Australia raise the [average] IQ of both countries" --- Sir Rob Muldoon, (1921 – 1992), 31st Prime Minister.

Lord Sidious
27th May 2011, 09:18
1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are already here!
NZ has already moved! :p

"New Zealanders who emigrate to Australia raise the [average] IQ of both countries" --- Sir Rob Muldoon, (1921 – 1992), 31st Prime Minister.

So what's your excuse perfectnuggetry?

Watching from Cyprus
27th May 2011, 09:26
Hi Witchy,

Elenin is passing closest to earth this year (not 2012) and it is public information from NASA. Believe it is in October 2011.

witchy1
27th May 2011, 09:42
Well, NASA knows all and lets us in on everything thank goodness. Where would we be without them - LOL

witchy1
27th May 2011, 10:02
That was facetious, apologies. Yes Elenin is supposed to be a comet according to them and due October. However they dont talk about Nibaru (sometimes confused with Elenin I think). Many beleive the planet is the 12th in our solar system and bypasses close to us every 3600 years (or thereabouts). Tons of information on it. I dont know if its true or not. If it is and it does come in close - weeeelllllll, I dont think that is going to be a good thing. It will upset the sun and us as well.
7767

I guess personal opinions all round, and as always: be prepared.
Many of the old prophets including mother shipton nostradamus etc all speak of this comet and the red sky for 6 days, water everywhere and a hot place etc and that should be next year. Maybe its this year. Maybe not.
Maybe its all a big drama and distraction to take our minds of whats really going on.

witchy1
27th May 2011, 10:46
Here is Nibiru on the Swiss & Iraq bank notes. Probably should be on its own thread, but seeing as we were speaking about Nibaru.........

xETn5sxvzUA

loveandgratitude
27th May 2011, 10:52
NZ has grown heaps, so has Tasmania, Australia is about the same.
USA, Sth America, Africa look liike water world.
A new land mass in the Pacific.

This could serve as a real estate ad - where to invest for future returns.

witchy1
27th May 2011, 11:19
Hi Watching from Cyprus, dont know if you have seen this - Its really good.

Elenin tracking (hes calling it a brown dwarf) and how it lines up exactly with the Chile / NZ / Japan earthquakes dates even tho its far out.

However the bad news is that its getting closer AND the next same line up next dates are: October 17th, November 5th and November 23 THIS YEAR. Check it out (prolly should have its own thread)

Qi7wpEIGU0I

ThePythonicCow
27th May 2011, 12:58
I'm glad you got the images (maps) to show, witchy1. Sorry for not responding to your request for assistance earlier, but I was still trying to figure it out myself. I still don't know why these same maps did not show in your earlier post above.

(Will you share the sandbox toys with me ;) ?)

greybeard
27th May 2011, 13:13
There are a few threads started already regarding planet X Nibiru with quite a few videos.
The "evidence" is getting to the point of being credible.
Truth Seeker Dan has posted a lot over the months.

As a sugestion if you want to find a persons posts go to their profile page and there you will find all posts by that person.
As said Dan has posted much on the subject.

Chris

Hervé
27th May 2011, 17:48
And, now, for something completely... the same:




Zeta Talk, Planet X, & The Pole Shift Rocky Horror Show (Updated May 15, 2011) "You were right" (http://educate-yourself.org/lte/zetatalkrockhorrorshow08feb11.shtml)
[Update May 15, 2011: The following e-mail exchange took place in early February of this year. The letter writer, Katherine, was experiencing a lot of personal agitation and trepidation because she succumbed to one of the many mind-conditioning psyops which the Illuminated Ones are running in order to keep those who buy into these Doom & Gloom scenarios in a state of fear, panic, and anxiety. I told Katherine in my last reply to her on Feb. 9 that I would look forward to hearing from her in early May and she will come to see that there were no Pole shifts or other dramatic expressions of earth changes or cataclysms which she had feared would occur because she read and bought into the BS at ZetaTalk. I just received her e-mail tonight, May 15, 2011. It contained exactly three words: "you were right".
Don't you go through the many months of worry and unfounded anxiety that Katherine had to go through in order to learn that all Doom & Gloom scenarios are set ups and hoaxes--EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM WITHOUT EXCEPTION...Ken Adachi]


Full article here (http://educate-yourself.org/lte/zetatalkrockhorrorshow08feb11.shtml)

Snowbird
28th May 2011, 04:20
This site has some interesting videos concerned with the earth changes. One of these is a talk given by a man who is describing Gordon Michael Scallion's future world map. There is, however, no guarantee that these events will happen according to someone's prophecy, nor will they necessarily happen all at one time. These changes could take hundreds of years.

http://www.timeline2012.net/timeline-2012/future-maps

witchy1
28th May 2011, 04:59
I wonder why they seem to always have a pole shift to the right (looking from space onto the planet) i.e. north pole going clockwise. Why not anti clockwise????

dukes4monny
28th May 2011, 07:20
Sounds like now is a good time to buy a boat.........I have. :cool:
Perhaps Kevin Costne (http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi1341915417/)r was trying to tell us something :eek:

Gustav
28th May 2011, 18:55
Is it not more the case that those area's that have been claimed from the see are being liquified by the earthquakes etc? This goes both for japan and new zealand. This would not immediately mean that either of them is sinking or rising. At least not in a time scale of months I think. Geographic history has shown the rising of sinking of continents and islands alike to be a rather frequent occurence over the past few billion years. Seen on that timescale, new zealand and japan are heading for a rise or sink pretty quickly indeed ;)

Watching from Cyprus
29th May 2011, 10:12
Hi Witchy,

Yes i have seen the vids, thanks. the woman who made the vids has now moved to the mountains. We are in for a rough ride that is for sure.
Personally i dont think any lifeform can survive global flooding since thousands of New clear power plants will melt down, and then what!!!! nothing can survive that. Only chance is to get a ride from the ETs and let hope it will be the good ones picking us up :-)

I know this deserves a new thread but i never figured out how to start one. For all to see how controlled we are see here

The American Dream: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGk5ioEXlIM

Hidden rulers of Earth and the full real history of Money : http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Bankers.htm

When you have read the Story, you will be extremely strong in a knowledge which will swipe the feat away on any financial professional reading this.

Love to you all from Peter

Snowbird
29th May 2011, 17:23
I know that there exist some fabulous tellers-of-tall-tales. However, could these things have happened on a different timeline or dimension than where we are currently? Cayce? Nostradamus? Scallion? The Zetas? Are they all wrong?

Indonesia happened. Japan happened. These happened in this timeline/dimension....I think. What about the others?

Lord Sidious
30th May 2011, 01:53
Hi Witchy,

Yes i have seen the vids, thanks. the woman who made the vids has now moved to the mountains. We are in for a rough ride that is for sure.
Personally i dont think any lifeform can survive global flooding since thousands of New clear power plants will melt down, and then what!!!! nothing can survive that. Only chance is to get a ride from the ETs and let hope it will be the good ones picking us up :-)

I know this deserves a new thread but i never figured out how to start one. For all to see how controlled we are see here

The American Dream:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGk5ioEXlIM

Hidden rulers of Earth and the full real history of Money : http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Bankers.htm

When you have read the Story, you will be extremely strong in a knowledge which will swipe the feat away on any financial professional reading this.

Love to you all from Peter

That should sort you out.

The Truth Is In There
30th May 2011, 10:15
I wonder why they seem to always have a pole shift to the right (looking from space onto the planet) i.e. north pole going clockwise. Why not anti clockwise????

i believe that's because when planet x passes by its north pole will be towards the earth and earth has to shift so her south pole faces planet x. that's what causes the pole shift and crustal displacement, simple magnetic attraction, and why there will be three days of darkness (in the northern hemisphere) while planet x passes.

Fred259
30th May 2011, 12:02
[QUOTE=witchy1;230345]I wonder why they seem to always have a pole shift to the right (looking from space onto the planet) i.e. north pole going clockwise. Why not anti clockwise????


i believe that's because when planet x passes by its north pole will be towards the earth and earth has to shift so her south pole faces planet x.
Interesting “The Truth”….

I'm just a bit confused by your explanation to Witchy1 question. Are you talking about the Magnetic North Pole or the True North Pole or both?


that's what causes the pole shift and crustal displacement,

Please can you explain crustal displacement?



Simple magnetic attraction,

I agree with this, but are you talking about the magnetic pole?


And why there will be three days of darkness (in the northern hemisphere) while planet x passes.

Who is telling you this?

When is this planet x passing?

You say we will have three days of darkness in the Northern hemisphere, but what about the Southern Hemisphere, were Witchy is? Does she have three days of daylight?

Fred259
30th May 2011, 18:47
[QUOTE=witchy1;230345]I wonder why they seem to always have a pole shift to the right (looking from space onto the planet) i.e. north pole going clockwise. Why not anti clockwise????


It’s because of precession.

What is precession?

This is precession.

We take Witchy and put her on a pedestal like a ballerina, and spin her around at speed.

I then take both my hands and push her on her back.

The effect of this push applied to her back is that we would expect Witchy to fall on her face, or face downwards. However this doesn’t happen.

What happens is that precession applies and the applied force initiated by me pushing Witchy on her back is precessed through 90degrees and she will in fact fall on her arm or shoulder.

That is precession.

So the answer to the question is that the earth rotates anti-clockwise at 900nm /hr. Anything that hits the earth at speed is going to cause precession. The applied force will then be 90 degrees from the direction of rotation. So yes I agree Right.

Or

If you are standing at the waters edge on the beach at Sydney FACING the land.
Planet X hits Brisbane beach.
You would expect to fall on your face or facedown wouldn’t you.
However due to precession you will in fact fall on your right arm and shoulder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession

Teresa
31st May 2011, 09:57
I don't really like that new map :fear: little ole NZ looks too big and lumpy, I no likee. On the other hand look at Aussie, it really is the West Island.

Carmen
31st May 2011, 10:23
My, what will we call it Ausland, NewZalia, Um New Australia!!!

Teresa
31st May 2011, 10:42
My, what will we call it Ausland, NewZalia, Um New Australia!!!

I like NewZalia, has a ring to it. Very unique. Can't top that at this time of night I'm afraid. If you go by the 20 and 40 degree pole shift maps,
however, NZ is hard to spot at all. I'm hoping it's because the vid cut it off. In the end though what's the use in worrying about it, if it's gonna happen we'll just have to ride it out as best we can. I'm not yet convinced of any of the timing or manner in which such an earth change may occur, I mean no-one knows for sure. Just gotta keep positive and uplifted.

Teresa
31st May 2011, 10:49
NZ has grown heaps, so has Tasmania, Australia is about the same.
USA, Sth America, Africa look liike water world.
A new land mass in the Pacific.

This could serve as a real estate ad - where to invest for future returns.

The new land mass in the Pacific is interesting - ties in with Peter Deunov's prophecy.

HaveBlue
31st May 2011, 11:09
I am typing this literally 10m away from the waters edge on the Otago Harbour,Dunedin, New Zealand. I am lucky to be the only one on the whole peninsula to have a tidal creek which is actually a small esturary outside my window. I launch kayaks and dingies from my front lawn.

I like to feed the eels and ducks every day and I keep a very keen eye on the tide times, heights (relates to phase of the moon) and also the weather. I am also a keen yachtie and aeroplane nutter so I pay fairly close attention to such things. I have lived here for 10 and a bit years now and there has been no change to the very regular patterns in that time. The wee cottage is 140 years old. I have no reason to believe it will not be here in another 140 years either.

So In a nutshell the answer is for now at least a pretty well qualified no. If this changes I will post about it here first. Yes I promise.

witchy1
31st May 2011, 13:56
It’s because of precession
Fred that was a great explanation - I understand that falling to the side and not flat on your face now. So, just to clarify - it doesnt matter where the impact is? - what if you pushed from the front. Is it the same effect except falling onto my right side or left side.
If it hit Adelaide (the other side) I would still fall the same way as if it hit Brisbane. Does that make sense? In essence, if it hits from the right side I would fall right, and if it hits from the left I would fall on my left side?
If this is correct the Planet x is coming in from right (I think) so earth flicks to the right (clockwise)

(Ladies, I think we should call it our West Island and have an ANZAC currency. So we just need to find ourselves an East Island to complete the compass points - perhaps the Chatams might do????)

witchy1
31st May 2011, 14:05
Haveblue, I am envious. What a lovely spot. Do you follow Ken Ring? http://www.predictweather.co.nz/Default.aspx

I am just waiting for his 2011 NZ forecast to come thru. I will post in when I get it. Worth a shot :-)

witchy1
31st May 2011, 14:15
Here it is, havnt read it myself.

7836

oceanz
2nd July 2011, 00:53
[
URL="http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/2-9-tremor-surprises-residents-on-new-zealands-north-island/"]http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/2-9-tremor-surprises-residents-on-new-zealands-north-island/[/URL]

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ2KIXVx92Zw4jS33NuLZawZ-3t8Dd6heQRCDAaIaCZU5CSSJF3
Risk factors: The dynamism between the Pacific Plate and the Australian plate is growing. There are many visible signs of this including increased seismic tension along the Alpine Fault, the transform boundary that runs through New Zealand’s South Island. The dynamism from the subduction of the Pacific Plate below the Australian Plate will also ignite more activity in the volcanic arcs of Tonga and Kermadec. Escalating activity in this turbulent underwater volcanic valley is our first indication that dangers are increasing for New Zealand- volcanic and seismic risks for the North Island and shallow seismic quake risks for the South Island. Yesterday’s three earthquakes a 4.8, a 5.1 and a 5.5 in Tonga are an indication of the morphing progression of this geologic catastrophism that is gradually altering the face of the region. -The Extinction Protocol

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTU4QkBH4gAVD0znCnBBz5cvSiTGDOlPBUYubB-kvJ7jvkhFNFZqg
2.9 tremor surprises residents on New Zealand’s North IslandPosted on July 1, 2011 by The Extinction Protocol
July 1, 2011 – AUCKLAND –
The earthquake which shook Auckland tonight has been confirmed as a magnitude 2.9 shake but shallow at just 9km deep and centred in east Auckland just off Mission Bay. Geonet, which monitors seismic activity around New Zealand, released the data shortly after the quake hit at 9.09pm. It followed a 4.7 magnitude earthquake 90km west of Te Anau and just 5km deep which hit shortly before 6pm. There are no immediate reports of damage in the shake, but on Internet site Twitter, dozens reported feeling the quake. “Whoa. Just felt a little earthquake in Auckland,” wrote Bernard Hickey. “Our house just shook once – thought someone had driven into the garage door,” said Amanda Hosking in an email to nzherald. It “felt like a gentle rumble of a truck passing” wrote Alistair Helm. “Very brief duration, but noticeable jolt and brief vibration, freaked out my 10-year-old daughter,” Janetta Mackay of Takapuna wrote. The quake was reported by people in the Auckland suburbs of Glendowie, Mt Eden, Devonport, Grey Lynn and the central city. “While the earthquake was tiny compared to the aftershocks in Christchurch, it’s the rareness of earthquakes in Auckland that will make it a headline story,” wrote Philip Duncan of weatherwatch.co.nz. The largest earthquake known to have affected the Auckland region was a magnitude 6 jolt centred near the mouth of the Waikato River on June 24, 1891. Auckland has more than 5000 old buildings that could collapse in a moderate earthquake. The Auckland Council yesterday disclosed the scale of earthquake-prone buildings throughout the region. –NZ Herald

I think Auckland is built on something like 64 volcanoes so even having earthquakes there would make any person a bit jittery.

Here is a map of some volcanoes in Auckland:

http://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/Contexts/Volcanoes/Sci-Media/Images/Auckland-volcanic-field
http://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/var/sciencelearn/storage/images/contexts/volcanoes/sci-media/images/auckland-volcanic-field/227144-1-eng-NZ/Auckland-volcanic-field_full_size_portrait.jpg

Wiremu2011
2nd July 2011, 03:26
Well, I am in great doubt as to the likelihood of NZ either disappearing into the ocean, or joining up with Australia. A land mass that is part of the Ocean floor does not simply "move" and connect itself to another country..........this must be geographically, if not scientifically impossible!! I'm sure the rising of the oceans could mean certain low lying areas could disappear, but I would be very skeptical about the idea of NZ and/or Japan sinking/moving.

1/2 you sheep scaring kiwis are alread here!
NZ has already moved! :p
Yep, we sure are bro. Nothing like nice piece of prime Aussie lamb to chew on. LOL...I'm originally from one of those volatile areas (White Island)where's it's been reported theres been new activity. I remember as a kid we had to rehearse these drills at school in the event of a tsunami. All my relatives understandably are pretty much on edge, but living in denial that anything may happen given what's going on in the South Island. :(