Re reading 'The Law of One'

[Patience]

I have been wanting to find time to re read 'the law of one' for a while now and tonight I am setting aside time to get stuck into it ....when I first read the law of one I was only just beginning to 'wake up' and it opened up my eyes and my mind in so many ways. I realise that alot of time has passed since I first started to read the books and I couldn't absorb all the information at the time. I'm wondering if now...a few years on...I will be able to have more understanding and be able to grow further......so thats where my heads going to be stuck for the next few weeks .....:) I'll let you all know how I get on



P x

[DNA]

I need to find a free PDF of the "Law of One" series and check it out. I have to admit though,,,,,David Wilcock has left a bad taste in my mouth in relation to the law of one stuff.
I joined his message board a while back.
And you want to talk about the gustapo in terms of over moderation. It's rediculous over there.
I referenced Billy Meier when trying to make a point, and a moderator pulled my post.
They don't allow anything to be referenced unless it comes from Wilcock's holy mouth, or by way of the Law Of One material.
I lost a lot of respect for Wilcock over that message board.

[Mike Gorman]

I need to find a free PDF of the "Law of One" series and check it out. I have to admit though,,,,,David Wilcock has left a bad taste in my mouth in relation the the law of one stuff.
I joined his message board a while back.
And you want to talk about the gustapo in terms of over moderation. It's rediculous over there.
I referenced Billy Meier when trying to make a point, and a moderator pulled my post.
They don't allow anything to be referenced unless it comes from Wilcock's holy mouth, or by way of the Law Of One material.
I lost a lot of respect for Wilcock over that message board.

http://www.llresearch.org/library/the_law_of_one_pdf/the_law_of_one_pdf.aspx

I found this link, having a look also....

[Patience]

OOh I was going to post a link ....but you beat me to it :)

I started reading book 1 last night .... Phew...it's hard to understand some of it :(

[Patience]

I need to find a free PDF of the "Law of One" series and check it out. I have to admit though,,,,,David Wilcock has left a bad taste in my mouth in relation to the law of one stuff.
I joined his message board a while back.
And you want to talk about the gustapo in terms of over moderation. It's rediculous over there.
I referenced Billy Meier when trying to make a point, and a moderator pulled my post.
They don't allow anything to be referenced unless it comes from Wilcock's holy mouth, or by way of the Law Of One material.
I lost a lot of respect for Wilcock over that message board.


Alot of what I listened to and saw about David Wilcock didn't sit right with me ...so I stopped listening to him :(

[Positive Vibe Merchant]

I read the law of one material a couple of years back. Whether you give it credence or not, its worth the read. Take it all with a grain of salt, and then make your own choices.

PVM

[Anchor]

---


I need to find a free PDF of the "Law of One" series and check it out. I have to admit though,,,,,David Wilcock has left a bad taste in my mouth in relation to the law of one stuff.
I joined his message board a while back.
And you want to talk about the gustapo in terms of over moderation. It's rediculous over there.
I referenced Billy Meier when trying to make a point, and a moderator pulled my post.
They don't allow anything to be referenced unless it comes from Wilcock's holy mouth, or by way of the Law Of One material.
I lost a lot of respect for Wilcock over that message board.

Well they are entitled to their standards are they not?

David Wilcock and the Law Of One are not directly related!

David Wilcock has nothing to do with the "Law Of One" aka the Ra material that I think is being referred to in this thread.

The Law of One, was produced by LLResearch and is based on trance channeling of a rare kind between a core of three people working together, the two surviving members of that team are still actively working today. The entity channeled was a 6th Density social memory complex, known as Ra, who is millions of years old in our measurement of time.

The only connection I can see is that David Wilcock is that he has himself channeled an entity who he says is Ra, but his work was not the Law Of One. In my opinion the channeled work produced by David Wilcock is pretty good and seems to me to be resonant with the idea that it could be Ra.

I recommend reading the Law Of One to anyone and when you do, you will see NO mention of David Wilcock. The work was produced in early 1981 so a bit before Mr DW's time.

Here is a little extract .... ;)


QUESTIONER: I’m guessing that there are enough people who would understand what you are saying, who would be interested enough in it, for us to make a book of your communications and I wondered if you would agree to this?

If so, I was thinking that possibly a bit of historical background of yourself might be in order.

RA: I am Ra. The possibility of communication, as you would call it, from the One to the One, through distortion, acceptable for meaning is the reason we contacted this group. There are few who will grasp, without significant distortion, that which we communicate through this connection with this mind/body/spirit complex. However, if it be your desire to share our communications with others we have the distortion towards a perception that this would be most helpful in regularizing and crystallizing your own patterns of vibration upon the levels of experience which you call the life. If one is illuminated, are not all illuminated? Therefore, we are oriented towards speaking for you in whatever supply of speakingness you may desire. To teach/learn is the Law of One in one of its most elementary distortions.

[Golden]

Halo all...

I read the "Law of One" material some year's ago. From my perspective the overall tone of the information seemed to be somewhat mechanical/intellectual/sterile with an overall masculine frequency. Also, what is a social memory complex??? It has the flavor of a "hive collective". With that said, I do believe it has some valuable information and I would recommend everyone read it so you can form your own opinion.

In peace and fellowship,
Golden

[Anchor]

> Also, what is a social memory complex???

Plenty of hints in the material itself.

Ra: I am Ra. A mind/body/spirit social complex becomes a social memory complex when its entire group of entities are of one orientation or seeking. The group memory lost to the individuals in the roots of the tree of mind then becomes known to the social complex, thus creating a social memory complex. The advantages of this complex are the relative lack of distortion in understanding the social beingness and the relative lack of distortion in pursuing the direction of seeking, for all understanding/distortions are available to the entities of the society.

I think that sterile tone is a consequence of the rigour used in the channel to remove "distortion" as much as possible from the message. To use an analogy, the material was not coloured it was pure balanced composite of colours - white.

Distortion would inevitably creep in, but as you can probably tell I rate it :)

Students of this material will find this interesting http://www.lawofone.info/ - a searchable wiki of the law of one.

[cayman]

尽信书，不如无书
If you embrace only ONE book (materials/source) with your whole heart, (eventually
)you would rather never read none(of them)

[Anchor]

尽信书，不如无书

I am told this is a saying by a Confucian philosopher ( Mengzi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mengzi), also named Yasheng ). It seems hard to translate:

My friends here have done some work:

"The purpose of having books is not to believe everything in them"
"If you believe all what the books say, you might as well have no books"
"If you trust every single thing from your reading,but don`t think of it,it could be better if you never read anything."
"It's better to have no book than to totally believe what it says"
"Better to have no books than blind faith in them."


And I completely agree with these ideas!

Thanks