The Invisible Sphere Seen in The Sun

[The One]

Regardless of what an individual might think this global image in this video seen beginning at time shot 6:51 maybe, there is a celestial knowing and awareness of many different sizes of objects hidden in rays of the sun even the planet sized ones as seen in this video

Now rather a light consciousness has advance far enough yet or not to believe or know that there are celestial objects not only hidden of their appearance within rays of the sun light, but often passing in front of the sun … at the least humanity have come far enough to consider their possibilities …

I often consider that those which jump in so quickly to discredit such a focus shot of the sun as this video (faked or not) … would either be sooo deeply unenlightened …. that such an idea seems completely incomprehensible .. or of the governing group put in play to keep humanity dumb down to celestial truth


_Sk7gpJV2fI

[the trojan]

excellent
well explained
most explanations/theories discussed
very convincing

[Mark Aldebaran]

This is amazing, and convincing proof that at least one person out there needs a physics lesson.

There probably are some near-perfect lenses, but only 'near-perfect' at one wavelength (one colour of light). All lenses are ground/polished approximately and then have corrective coatings applied. Because of our slow and very limited-bandwidth eyeballs (response is roughly Gaussian) the lenses and coatings are optimized around 550 nm (green), where the human eye peaks. The sun, being a major source of an unbelievable chunk of the electromagnetic spectrum, does not really understand (or respect) the very tiny slit that we call visible light, so we get all kinds of stuff that we cannot see. You may even have heard of IR (that warms us up) and UV (that gives us a tan). Well, all of that and a whole bunch more is raining down on us and on our pathetically inadequate cameras. A lot of this can be filtered. A bandpass filter (e.g. from Optical Coating Labs) wouldn't be perfect but it would kill many of these aberrations. It would also cost about 100 times the cost of the camera.

Many aberrations are caused by visible light not doing as it's told by the lens. On top of that is some invisible light playing around and ending up visible. In addition, we have the spectral response of the CCD, which is much wider than humans. A normal CCD gets a whiff of UV and up to 900 NIR, a deep-well CCD goes over 1 micron. Any crummy digital camera can see the IR coming from a remote (820 nm). So all these wavelengths, much longer and shorter than we can see, are in there bouncing around a lens that was not designed to accommodate them, but which can be recorded by the CCD. Anyone that thinks these aberration artifacts are hidden planets needs psychiatric help.

Try taking the same shot with different lenses and different cameras. A hunch says it will change size and move around.

PS. Photography has been with us a long time now, but the motto of the early days still holds true:
Never point a camera at the Sun. (Or a Brown Dwarf will get you.)

[the trojan]

This is amazing, and convincing proof that at least one person out there needs a physics lesson.

There probably are some near-perfect lenses, but only 'near-perfect' at one wavelength (one colour of light). All lenses are ground/polished approximately and then have corrective coatings applied. Because of our slow and very limited-bandwidth eyeballs (response is roughly Gaussian) the lenses and coatings are optimized around 550 nm (green), where the human eye peaks. The sun, being a major source of an unbelievable chunk of the electromagnetic spectrum, does not really understand (or respect) the very tiny slit that we call visible light, so we get all kinds of stuff that we cannot see. You may even have heard of IR (that warms us up) and UV (that gives us a tan). Well, all of that and a whole bunch more is raining down on us and on our pathetically inadequate cameras. A lot of this can be filtered. A bandpass filter (e.g. from Optical Coating Labs) wouldn't be perfect but it would kill many of these aberrations. It would also cost about 100 times the cost of the camera.

Many aberrations are caused by visible light not doing as it's told by the lens. On top of that is some invisible light playing around and ending up visible. In addition, we have the spectral response of the CCD, which is much wider than humans. A normal CCD gets a whiff of UV and up to 900 NIR, a deep-well CCD goes over 1 micron. Any crummy digital camera can see the IR coming from a remote (820 nm). So all these wavelengths, much longer and shorter than we can see, are in there bouncing around a lens that was not designed to accommodate them, but which can be recorded by the CCD. Anyone that thinks these aberration artifacts are hidden planets needs psychiatric help.

Try taking the same shot with different lenses and different cameras. A hunch says it will change size and move around.

PS. Photography has been with us a long time now, but the motto of the early days still holds true:
Never point a camera at the Sun. (Or a Brown Dwarf will get you.)

excellent
well explained
most explanations/theories discussed
very convincing