View Full Version : Russia Says IMF Chief Jailed For Discovering All US Gold Is Gone
oceanz
1st June 2011, 02:22
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1489.htm
May 31, 2011
Russia Says IMF Chief Jailed For Discovering All US Gold Is Gone
By: Sorcha Faal
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/imt1.jpg
new report prepared for Prime Minister Putin by the Federal Security Service (FSB) says that former International Monetary Fund (IMF) Chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn [photo with Putin top left] was charged and jailed in the US for sex crimes on May 14th after his discovery that all of the gold held in the United States Bullion Depository located at Fort Knox [photo 2nd left] was ‘missing and/or unaccounted’ for.
According to this FSB secret report, Strauss-Kahn had become “increasingly concerned” earlier this month after the United States began “stalling” its pledged delivery to the IMF of 191.3 tons of gold agreed to under the Second Amendment of the Articles of Agreement signed by the Executive Board in April 1978 that were to be sold to fund what are called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as an alternative to what are called reserve currencies.
This FSB report further states that upon Strauss-Kahn raising his concerns with American government officials close to President Obama he was ‘contacted’ by ‘rogue elements’ within the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) who provided him ‘firm evidence’ that all of the gold reported to be held by the US ‘was gone’.
Upon Strauss-Kahn receiving the CIA evidence, this report continues, he made immediate arrangements to leave the US for Paris, but when contacted by agents working for France’s General Directorate for External Security (DGSE) that American authorities were seeking his capture he fled to New York City’s JFK airport following these agents directive not to take his cell-phone because US police could track his exact location.
Once Strauss-Kahn was safely boarded on an Air France flight to Paris, however, this FSB report says he made a ‘fatal mistake’ by calling the hotel from a phone on the plane and asking them to forwarded the cell-phone he had been told to leave behind to his French residence, after which US agents were able to track and apprehend him.
Within the past fortnight, this report continues, Strauss-Kahn reached out to his close friend and top Egyptian banker Mahmoud Abdel Salam Omar to retrieve from the US the evidence given to him by the CIA. Omar, however, and exactly like Strauss-Kahn before him, was charged yesterday by the US with a sex crime against a luxury hotel maid, a charge the FSB labels as ‘beyond belief’ due to Omar being 74-years-old and a devout Muslim.
In an astounding move puzzling many in Moscow, Putin after reading this secret FSB report today ordered posted to the Kremlin’s official website a defense of Strauss-Khan becoming the first world leader to state that the former IMF chief was a victim of a US conspiracy. Putin further stated, “It’s hard for me to evaluate the hidden political motives but I cannot believe that it looks the way it was initially introduced. It doesn’t sit right in my head.”
Interesting to note about all of these events is that one of the United States top Congressman, and 2012 Presidential candidate, Ron Paul [photo bottom left] has long stated his belief that the US government has lied about its gold reserves held at Fort Knox. So concerned had Congressman Paul become about the US government and the Federal Reserve hiding the truth about American gold reserves he put forward a bill in late 2010 to force an audit of them, but which was subsequently defeated by Obama regime forces.
(Read more at above link)
Lord Sidious
1st June 2011, 02:26
I call :bs:
It isn't even a secret that there is no gold.
Ron Paul has been saying that for years.
But then again, this is sorcha faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal.
oceanz
1st June 2011, 02:30
A bit of sensationalised journalism you say lol.
Maia Gabrial
1st June 2011, 02:48
I think whoever gave the Chinese the gold plated tungsten, really pissed them off. Who wouldn't be angry? You have to shake your heads at these crooks as they dig themselves a very BIG grave....
Maia
Lord Sidious
1st June 2011, 02:55
A bit of sensationalised journalism you say lol.
You are very perceptive.
For a nugget. :p
Maia Gabrial
1st June 2011, 03:00
:rolleyes:
Maia
andrewgreen
1st June 2011, 03:41
Saying it and the IMF boss providing hard evidence is a different thing entirely.
'In an astounding move puzzling many in Moscow, Putin after reading this secret FSB report today ordered posted to the Kremlin’s official website a defense of Strauss-Khan becoming the first world leader to state that the former IMF chief was a victim of a US conspiracy. Putin further stated, “It’s hard for me to evaluate the hidden political motives but I cannot believe that it looks the way it was initially introduced. It doesn’t sit right in my head.”
And we will never know unless Fort Knox is audited. To ask for an audit of Ft. Knox is a bit of posturing as well... like that will ever happen. Don't get me wrong, I want Ron Paul for President, and I'd love to see an aduit but asking for an audit of Ft. Knox is like asking someone or, some entity, to jump up and down in quick sand.
T Smith
1st June 2011, 04:05
**Edit: Let's assume Sorcha Faal is engaged here in a sensationally hypothetical untrue truth**
If Strauss-Kahn was going to disclose the solvency of Fort Knox (or blackmail to gain geopolitical power), and the establishment neutralized this threat so effectively, where does this leave Ron Paul?
Ron Paul's stock continues to rise. Though the media is still pushing "he can't get elected" card, it's not really working. The grassroots are really throwing weight behind him. If his support reaches a certain threshold, it will become obvious to the herd that he is a serious candidate and has a bona fide shot at winning the nomination. At this point, it will become increasingly impossible for the Ministry of Truth/Madison Avenue to manipulate the vote away from him, as they successfully did in 2008; a dam will break, and a whole group of mainstream Republicans will begin to support him where they otherwise would not have.
If/when this happens, Ron Paul has a problem. Like Strauss-Kahn, he officially becomes an enemy of the state. I have to wonder to what degree he and his team have thought this through, if his ticket continues to gain political ground. I assume the establishment is betting the Ron Paul Revolution won't gain too much traction. But if by some uncalculated chance this buzzing fly becomes a swarm of locus, the establishment will have to respond.
That Fort Knox was looted long ago comes to no surprise here, but the unsuspecting public, who have no idea who or what is running this planet, only dismiss Ron Paul because they live in a fictional world of lawfulness, justice and representative government, wherein his platform is alien to them (or even a bit kooky, per Madison Avenue's capitalization on public ignorance). The fantasy world Madison Avenue has created for the people of the United States has been dormant for almost 100 years. Ron Paul is well aware of this. My gut feeling is his rogue objective in this light is to capitalize himself on public naivety, just as tptb do, fully assume the role of Madison Avenue's illusions via the political process (just as the public understands it), and proceed through the channels of legitimate government to expose it otherwise. That route, of course, has never worked in the past and is throughly blocked by the corrupt power structure. One would have an easier chance directing an elephant through the eye of a needle. I find it fascinating that Ron Paul has reached this far in what seems to me a quest for the impossible. The million dollar question here is this: can Ron Paul really be breaking through that road block?
While the masses operate under the illusion that the United States is a legitimate government, Ron Paul is clearly wining support among the blind. This is a very interesting development. Here we see how easily tptb dispatched a powerful man in Strauss-Kahn, who at the end of the day may represent much less a threat to the establishment than Ron Paul. I don't think they are going to have as easy a task of pinning a bogus sexual escapade on him, which makes me even more nervous and contemplative about what they will do to neutralize the threat....
Rocky_Shorz
1st June 2011, 04:12
Ron Paul is a good guy, but don't get your blood pounding over Sorcha, one of the Web's best spin doctors... ;)
Siberia9
1st June 2011, 05:11
Here is what my Russian wife just said about this, "Dont trust these Russians, they are crazy" and I agree LOL, and yes the gold is probably like that old scam, stacked up to the ceiling, with nothing behind it but crickets, just one row in front.
Lost Soul
2nd June 2011, 04:13
Actually this is no surprise. The story is that by removing the gold from Fort Knox, the United States can never return to the gold standard and must accept the new world currency (special drawing rights and electronic cash).
Wow this is an amazing post. This makes a lot of sense when you combine it with what David Wilcock was saying about the Chinese catching CHASE bank trying to pay a debt with gold that was filled with tungston steel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and CHASE bank saying they got the tungston filled gold from the federal reserve.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Saying it and the IMF boss providing hard evidence is a different thing entirely.
Very true, Drew,,,,,very true.
Shocking Display
6th June 2011, 15:10
One small problem with this report is, if we are lead to beleive that all Passports and boarding passes are screened by the NSA etc etc, WHy did it take a phone call to his hotel to track him. I am sure the TSA and NSA would keep tabs on the whereabouts of the head of the IMF, especially if they were looking for him.....
oceanz
6th June 2011, 22:03
Perhaps people in high up circles flying via private jets are not subjected to nasty TSA pat downs and normal security protocols?
MariaDine
6th June 2011, 22:23
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPslTZAqZPc&feature=related
observer
6th June 2011, 23:01
This issue of 'no gold in Fort Knox' goes back much further than anyone on this forum seems to be aware.
Back in the mid seventies, I used to subscribe to an audio-letter produced by Dr. Beter.
Here's a link giving a brief description of Dr. Beter's credentials:
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/Dr-Peter-Beter/Dr_Beter_Special_Tape-7-Part-01.mp3
(Note: Double click on the Windows Media Player screen to get-out of the window)
Dr. Beter talks about the Fort Knox scandal way back in the seventies. Here's just one example of his disclosures:
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/Dr-Peter-Beter/Dr_Peter_Beter_AL-02-Part-02.mp3
So.... What has changed? What aspect of this story has gotten any better in the thirty five interim years that have transpired?
Just like the John F. Kennedy assassination.... nothing has changed for the better....
For those of you interested in the research, a full list of the Dr. Beter audio-letters can be found here:
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/index.html
An index of those letters can be found here:
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/all/dbaltpcs.html
A free online copy of his book, 'Conspiracy Against The Dollar', can be found here:
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/thecad.html
oceanz
7th June 2011, 22:16
http://goldnews.com/2011/06/02/fed-lawyer-alvarez-the-federal-reserve-does-not-own-any-gold-at-all/
Fed Lawyer Alvarez: “The Federal Reserve Does NOT Own Any Gold at All”
Thats right. The Fed owns NO gold. Zero, zip, ziltch.
For those of you who did not watch yesterday’s monetary policy hearing in the house of representatives, you most likely missed this bombshell exchange between Federal Reserve lawyer Scott Alvarez and committee chairman Dr. Ron Paul. My jaw literally dropped when I heard the Fed’s general counsel declare that the Federal Reserve owns no gold. After 1934, Alvarez explains that the Fed handed its gold over to the Treasury in exchange for gold certificates. When pressed further, Alvarez noted that the gold certificates do not represent any interest whatsoever in the gold itself. He explained the gold certificate listings on the Fed balance sheet, not as a claim to gold, but at most a claim to dollars from the Treasury. See the quotes here (and watch the videos at the bottom of the post):
Scott Alvarez: “The Federal Reserve does not own any gold at all… we have not owned gold since 1934, um, so we have not engaged in any gold swap. Before 1934 the Federal Reserve did, we did own gold. We turned that over by law to the Treasury and received in return for that gold certificates.”
Ron Paul: “…You have the securities for essentially all the gold?”
Scott Alvarez: “No. No we have no interest in the gold that is owned by the Treasury. We have simply an accounting document that is called gold certificates that represents the value at a statutory rate that we gave to the Treasury in 1934″
This issue is even more complicated than may appear and after doing some research we seem to have settled some of the quirks in this odd Treasury-Fed scheme. Bare with us when reading through this.
What appears to have happened under the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 is the Treasury seized the Fed’s gold, taking full ownership and claim to its proceeds. The Treasury as an aside transferred a sum of special 1934 series gold certificates to the Fed amounting to the statutory value of gold ($20.67 per ounce) times the quantity of gold transfered from the Fed to the Treasury. The official gold price was later revalued to $35 an ounce, an effective devaluation of the currency, but the quantity of gold certificates issued to the Fed was not amended to reflect revaluation until the passing of the Par Value Modification Act of 1972. Under this act, gold was revalued again, this time to $38 an oz, and the Fed’s gold certificate account was credited upwards by $822 million worth of certificates to reflect the change in the gold price from $35 to $38. The gold was revalued one last time in 1973 to $42.22 and again the Federal Reserve was credited with more gold certificates, $1.157 billion to be exact, to account for this. After everything, the Federal Reserve was left with $11.16 billion dollars worth of gold certificates.
So what exactly are the gold certificates the Fed holds? For one, the Fed’s gold certificates are unlike previous gold certificate issues, and are not publicly trade-able. They are also not direct claims to gold, but rather reflect claims only to US issued currency or coin held by the Treasury. The Fed can take claim to this currency on demand, and their certificates are an accounted for liability of the Treasury as listed in Note 19. Treasury’s “Other Liabilities”. In addition, if the Treasury is unable to satisfy a demand by the Fed for the funds, the Fed is able to gain access to the gold, since the gold stands as collateral for the gold certificates issued by the Treasury. This fact is taken from this statement in Note 2, from the Treasury’s balance sheet:
“Gold totaling $11.1 billion as of September 30, 2010, and 2009, was pledged as collateral for gold certificates issued and authorized to the FRBs by the Secretary of the Treasury.“
(Read more at above link)
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.