Interdimensional UFO's Explained By David Sereda

[mojo]

Hi All,
David Sereda is one of my favorite UFO researchers. I believe the ET's visiting this location in Oregon are interdimensional. Before craft phase shift into this dimesion I have seen them move through solid objects like trees. In this video David does a great job explaining how this works.


sthUYzBFIV8

[Cjay]

The skeptic in me has to ask, how does he know? We humans tend to over-simplify things. I think it is fair to say, we don't know yet, we may not be capable of understanding it or explaining it accurately and we may never know.

Interesting footage - I have seen it before but I am sure many have not. Thanks for sharing it.

[mojo]

Hi Cjay,
Good point and being skeptical is not bad...At the 2010 UFO convention David Sereda spoke a little about his contact experience. Perhaps his experience as a contactee has helped him make the hypothesis that explains multidimensional travel. Also david did alot of research on antigravity and differentials which may have led him to these conclusions. You can watch the 2010 ufo convention clips on youtube. I can't wait for the 2011 ufo convention videos to be uploaded, although I'm not sure if David spoke at this latest convention.

[Cjay]

I love this stuff as much as anyone else, which is why I joined this forum. I really WANT to believe. I have done a lot of research on, among hundreds of other things, free energy and anti-gravity. However, until now, I have not caused either to occur, at least as far as I am aware. I still believe both are possible. In my research, I have observed a lot of things I can't explain.

I have even had a piece of plastic vanish from my hand when I received an electric shock. Ok, I guess I threw it, in that split-second reflex - but it was in my bedroom, with closed windows and door. I systematically searched every cubic inch of my bedroom for countless hours over MANY years but the plastic cap from one end of my fluorescent desk-lamp was never seen again.

Having said all that, I am not criticizing David Sereda's description of his observations. Actually, I think his explanation is the best I have heard. I am merely suggesting that we need to be very careful not to jump to conclusions and not to accept every attempted explanation that sounds plausible because we have not yet come up with a better explanation. If, on the other hand, he said, "I know this to be true because I can replicate this - here, watch this"... then I would say, "wow, cool, let me try it".