PDA

View Full Version : Toronto Police Shoot Woman Point Blank To Incite Riot



ktlight
6th June 2011, 09:30
'This is absolutely unacceptable behavior on behalf of the Toronto police department in Canada. We have seen this type provocateur behavior before from police, but this is point blank crazy.

The defenseless woman gets pounded with a teargas shell.

This premeditated police action seems to be more that an outright criminal assault on Peacefull Assemby, it is a Military Operation to CONDITION ALL OF US that this type of Police Action is acceptable or even worse, justified.'


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYQRwqiNbG4

Tony
6th June 2011, 09:32
Oh my goodness!
These people are not human.

Cjay
6th June 2011, 09:52
When are police and the cowards who hide behind them going to be held to account?

the_flyingboy
6th June 2011, 10:03
this is todays justice and from what it looks like this is just the start....who is the terrorist now?

Teakai
6th June 2011, 10:09
That was weird. Why did it cut off so soon?

The person lying on the ground wasn't the woman at the front - she had on white shoes.
It also looks like the policeman aims past her.
Also, the woman is standing next to a yellow line marked along the road - the body on the ground isn't.


I'm all for exposing police brutality, but this one feels misleading.

ktlight
6th June 2011, 10:21
That was weird. Why did it cut off so soon?

The person lying on the ground wasn't the woman at the front - she had on white shoes.
It also looks like the policeman aims past her.
Also, the woman is standing next to a yellow line marked along the road - the body on the ground isn't.


I'm all for exposing police brutality, but this one feels misleading.

Well, definitely there is a body on the ground. Does it matter which person was put there. It goes against the grain of what the police are supposed to be about. THEY DO AFTER ALL SWEAR ON OATH TO PROTECT US ALL.

Teakai
6th June 2011, 10:52
That was weird. Why did it cut off so soon?

The person lying on the ground wasn't the woman at the front - she had on white shoes.
It also looks like the policeman aims past her.
Also, the woman is standing next to a yellow line marked along the road - the body on the ground isn't.


I'm all for exposing police brutality, but this one feels misleading.

Well, definitely there is a body on the ground. Does it matter which person was put there. It goes against the grain of what the police are supposed to be about. THEY DO AFTER ALL SWEAR ON OATH TO PROTECT US ALL.

It matters to me. I'm not just going to accept something as being so because I'm told it is.

I understand what you're saying - but we don't know the story here. The title is misleading - we are led to believe the unarmed woman at the front is the victim of this point blank shooting.
This is false.
If it was legit, then why could they have not been honest with presenting the video - not cut and run at the end hoping to plant the idea into our heads that the woman at the front was the victim.

Also - riot police in Canada use rubber bullets -so it's not like it was fatal. Probably hurt like a b*gger, though - but a bit different to being shot by a real bullet.

ktlight
6th June 2011, 12:29
That was weird. Why did it cut off so soon?

The person lying on the ground wasn't the woman at the front - she had on white shoes.
It also looks like the policeman aims past her.
Also, the woman is standing next to a yellow line marked along the road - the body on the ground isn't.


I'm all for exposing police brutality, but this one feels misleading.

Well, definitely there is a body on the ground. Does it matter which person was put there. It goes against the grain of what the police are supposed to be about. THEY DO AFTER ALL SWEAR ON OATH TO PROTECT US ALL.

It matters to me. I'm not just going to accept something as being so because I'm told it is.

I understand what you're saying - but we don't know the story here. The title is misleading - we are led to believe the unarmed woman at the front is the victim of this point blank shooting.
This is false.
If it was legit, then why could they have not been honest with presenting the video - not cut and run at the end hoping to plant the idea into our heads that the woman at the front was the victim.

Also - riot police in Canada use rubber bullets -so it's not like it was fatal. Probably hurt like a b*gger, though - but a bit different to being shot by a real bullet.

I presumed the title was reference to the woman who was in front of the crowd too.

DNA
6th June 2011, 13:08
That was weird. Why did it cut off so soon?

The person lying on the ground wasn't the woman at the front - she had on white shoes.
It also looks like the policeman aims past her.
Also, the woman is standing next to a yellow line marked along the road - the body on the ground isn't.


I'm all for exposing police brutality, but this one feels misleading.

Excellent deductions. You did a bang on job of pointing out the descrepancies. Thank You

the trojan
6th June 2011, 15:23
That was weird. Why did it cut off so soon?

The person lying on the ground wasn't the woman at the front - she had on white shoes.
It also looks like the policeman aims past her.
Also, the woman is standing next to a yellow line marked along the road - the body on the ground isn't.


I'm all for exposing police brutality, but this one feels misleading.

Well, definitely there is a body on the ground. Does it matter which person was put there. It goes against the grain of what the police are supposed to be about. THEY DO AFTER ALL SWEAR ON OATH TO PROTECT US ALL.

It matters to me. I'm not just going to accept something as being so because I'm told it is.

I understand what you're saying - but we don't know the story here. The title is misleading - we are led to believe the unarmed woman at the front is the victim of this point blank shooting.
This is false.
If it was legit, then why could they have not been honest with presenting the video - not cut and run at the end hoping to plant the idea into our heads that the woman at the front was the victim.

Also - riot police in Canada use rubber bullets -so it's not like it was fatal. Probably hurt like a b*gger, though - but a bit different to being shot by a real bullet.
yes you are quite right in what you state,in regard to who the policemen was aiming at,unless the body on the ground is also female .
one thing i dont like is your assumption that a rubber bullet only hurts like a bugger.
Rubber bullets are big heavy things and will kill you if they hit the right spot.
I had an American teacher at school who had in his possession ,a rubber bullet.Dont think for a minute that it is just the same size as a normal bullet.

seko
6th June 2011, 16:58
only united we can stop this brutality! Here is a good example, even though I do not support violence of any kind I still know that sometimes is necessary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZP-ebvRd-8&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZP-ebvRd-8&feature=player_embedded

thanks you LS

Lord Sidious
6th June 2011, 21:06
only united we can stop this brutality! Here is a good example, even though I do not support violence of any kind I still know that sometimes is necessary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZP-ebvRd-8&feature=player_embedded

When the cops have to be careful of us, that is when they will stop behaving like wild beasts.

Carmody
6th June 2011, 21:41
someone had to allow the given police officers to get away with the situation. Someone has to send the commands down the line.

Point:

One out of every six police officers in North America (and it's probably at least the same in the UK and Australia) is a Freemason.

The vast majority of the given police department heads (homicide, vice, etc) ..are Freemasons.

The chief of police is usually a Freemason. (very high odds, ie, +95% or thereabouts-in the bigger jurisdictions)

As told to me directly by a 'fairly' high level (degree) Freemason---- who quit .....in absolute disgust.

Remember this point -- it is important.

For when I make these exact sort of statements, here, on this forum, I end up being followed around --- for days.

Freemasons (as told to me by the man who quit) do indeed kill their members or ex-members who 'talk out of school'. They want that man's name. He even talked about a few dead members, the last time I spoke with him. Recall the police situation. Almost every 'level' that a Freemason move up to, the oaths they take... speak of ever increasingly horrible deaths for those who 'betray'.

Ie, how does a dead Freemason...have his death so poorly investigated?

This mess is deep within the system..... and it is totally out of control.

You want an answer of how this insanity moves through the system?

There it is--right there.

Teakai
6th June 2011, 22:31
yes you are quite right in what you state,in regard to who the policemen was aiming at,unless the body on the ground is also female .
one thing i dont like is your assumption that a rubber bullet only hurts like a bugger.
Rubber bullets are big heavy things and will kill you if they hit the right spot.
I had an American teacher at school who had in his possession ,a rubber bullet.Dont think for a minute that it is just the same size as a normal bullet.

Hi Trojan- I think you're missing the point. The point being the video and title are misleading and don't present a true picture of what happened, but attempted to deliberately mislead.


Maybe it hurts like a f*cker and not a b*gger, I don't know, but a real bullet has more chance of being fatal than a rubber bullet. I mentioned the bullet being rubber as an aside, because people may think it was a real bullet.
I suggest the video ended so quickly because the figure on the ground was getting up - but whoever cut it off so quickly wanted to give the impression the person had been killed.
(They weren't in a dead position anyway)

Hummingbird
6th June 2011, 22:32
I have seen exactly what you have stated Carmody played out in a small town in Ca where there is ALOT of oil...

My uncle was shot dead in his gunshop by a Freemason police chief and the ATF in that town and he was a hardcore truther RIP Uncle..

A few years after he passed the truth flame sparked in me and never died no coincidence

Maia Gabrial
6th June 2011, 22:37
Yeah, the woman was so scary (and threatening) with nothing in her hands and only a camera hanging around her neck as she's backing up. Ah, the poor little fully-armed and loaded cop must have dropped a load in his uniformed trousers by this threat....Maybe he won't live it down later.... What a bunch of maroons....
Maia

Second Son
6th June 2011, 23:03
I wish the americans would all grow a pair and resist this brutality with the sheer elegance and beauty these people demonstrated. It may not be PC, but damn was that a wonderful site!!! Oh yeah, and to all government officials reading this (and you KNOW you are)... I would never threaten you openly, because THAT would be illegal, BUT for all of you cops who have ever used exesive force, who have beaten up on someone in handcuffs Like the previous video) or tazered, maced, or tear gassed anyone without cause, I say this:

YOUR TIME WILL COME, YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR YOUR ACTIONS, AND UNFORTUNATELY FOR YOU, THAT JUDGMENT WILL NOT COME AT THE HANDS OF AN IMAGINARY WRATHFUL GOD, BUT AT THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY MOB, A MOB OF PATRIOTS WHO ARE NOT AFRAID ANY MORE, A MOB WHO WILL DOLE OUT A JUDGEMENT JUST AS HARSH AS YOUR PAST ACTIONS MERIT. WHEN THIS CRAZY FACIST POLICE STATE WHICH YOU PROP UP TREATS US ALL SO BRUTALLY AS A MATTER OF COURSE, THAT THE CONSEQUENCES OF RESISTING SEEM PALATABLE COMPARED TO THE BITTER TASTE OF SUBSERVIENCE, YOU WILL PAY!

Wookie
7th June 2011, 08:17
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zejD0UkMGGY

The OP clip is featured in this documentary. Hopefully watching it will add much needed context to the OP

Peaceful Journeys Wookies

Fred Steeves
7th June 2011, 08:26
THEY DO AFTER ALL SWEAR ON OATH TO PROTECT US ALL.


Funny you mention that. I just commented to my wife the other day that "To Serve and Protect" is out, "To Stalk and fleece" is in. Don't they more and more remind you of the famous footage of the crocodiles laying in wait for the wilderbeasts?

Cheers,
Fred