The One
24th June 2011, 05:37
When i look at witnesses in realtion to UFO'S these guys are top of my list.The people who have actually worked in the military and we are not talking about junior officers we are talking about high ranking people who have served in the mililtary and have witnessed these.
So you would think the government, Air force would make a statement in relation to what these guys are saying.They keep quite and hope it will go away.
Now we all remember the press conference at the end of 2010 http://news.discovery.com/space/ufos-spying-on-our-nukes-airmen-claim.html
well this is the latest
Hastings says he got the latest leads in December from a “retired missile maintenance technician with contacts at F.E. Warren” and that two additional USAF retirees verified the reports of UFO activity. All three are unnamed. After having persuaded Fennstermacher and six other USAF veterans to take a public stage on older cases in 2010, Hastings says he’s unconcerned with what critics will say about his blanket use of confidential sources this time around:
“Hopefully,” Hastings writes in an email to De Void, “this article will shake some things loose and a few on-the-record sources will come forward. In any case, the skeptics skewer me even when I use named-sources so why would this be any different?”
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/745/341/A_Vacuum_Of_Names.html
So you would think the government, Air force would make a statement in relation to what these guys are saying.They keep quite and hope it will go away.
Now we all remember the press conference at the end of 2010 http://news.discovery.com/space/ufos-spying-on-our-nukes-airmen-claim.html
well this is the latest
Hastings says he got the latest leads in December from a “retired missile maintenance technician with contacts at F.E. Warren” and that two additional USAF retirees verified the reports of UFO activity. All three are unnamed. After having persuaded Fennstermacher and six other USAF veterans to take a public stage on older cases in 2010, Hastings says he’s unconcerned with what critics will say about his blanket use of confidential sources this time around:
“Hopefully,” Hastings writes in an email to De Void, “this article will shake some things loose and a few on-the-record sources will come forward. In any case, the skeptics skewer me even when I use named-sources so why would this be any different?”
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/745/341/A_Vacuum_Of_Names.html