View Full Version : Alleged Artifacts in Deep Space
The One
8th July 2011, 11:23
Remember this
A film By JOSE ESCAMILLA. Features Real Spacecraft Captured In Deep Space By An Amatuer Astronomer Star Gazer, John Lenard Walson Using A 12″ Telescope And an HD camcorder. Amazing Footage. It is truly hard to say exactly what it is this man has captured on his camera. One can certainly imagine what they could easily be
KQR-X-IliB8
If those are "ships" they look almost organic.......
westhill
8th July 2011, 12:35
They really look like deep ocean life forms, so I agree with 777 about the organic quality. It may be that other beings are hitching a ride within living vehicles
suited to deep space travel (no need to construct). We are only limited by our imagination...
westhill
Flasky
8th July 2011, 12:35
hm...It didn't give me such a nice vibe, I don't know if anyone felt it too? Perhaps it was just the music.
Also - didn't anyone think that some of the 'ships' looked like dragons, 'faces' and actual living things such as insect or creatures that would seemed to live at the bottom of the ocean?
Nikola014
8th July 2011, 16:45
This "ships" reminds me on the Klingon ship from Star Trek :cool:
Cidersomerset
8th July 2011, 17:25
Thanks the one ....My immediate reaction was its deepsea submersible footage of glowing squid and jellyfish type creatures.....I agree they look organic , that being said I don't think space is a vacum, but a giant occean full of life , like the 'space Critters seen on the NASA 'Tether' footage , and on the moon .......more mysteries to ponder..cheers.... Steve
Etherios
8th July 2011, 19:26
well i dont think they are shapeshifting ... i think its the sunlight changing direction and shinning different parts of these objects... But i am sure something is there atm ... and has been there for alot of years.
Is it my bad memory or did Charles mention that space was like the ocean?
Etherios
8th July 2011, 19:56
Is it my bad memory or did Charles mention that space was like the ocean?
Well dont take what charles said for granted. We dont know if its true or if it was a lie. His main issue was to mess up with our minds so better to ignore what he said true or false ...
General Urko
8th July 2011, 20:06
Interesting that Mr. Escamilla would release this. I was under the impression that John Lenard Walson (A.K.A. " Gridkeeper ") was proven to be a fraud By Mr. escamilla himself on A.T.S. a few months ago.
HURRITT ENYETO
8th July 2011, 20:26
Interesting that Mr. Escamilla would release this. I was under the impression that John Lenard Walson (A.K.A. " Gridkeeper ") was proven to be a fraud By Mr. escamilla himself on A.T.S. a few months ago.
That is correct, it all came out about the use of models etc when they had a major falling out,
Not to mention Mr. Escamilla's dubious discernment abilities.
Hurritt
Tweakzz
8th July 2011, 20:46
Very interesting to look at. And indeed a trace of "organic" / deep ocean. So with the "rods" and other life forms we have heard about some of these pictures may indeed be ships and others may be lifeforms - that's the nice thing about a mystery of an unknown universe.
However - like Flasky posted re the music, and IMO, it feels very much like a one sided view of "threats" and watching etc - it smells a bit.
Like the old truth meat in a lie sandwich. Hold the let-us? ;) (BLT or TnL anyone?)
Also one wonders how much different, dare i say 'better' this video would have been if instead it had been narrated from (what i would think) the more positive and awe aspects - speculating more on function than conflict. Oh, and indeed - better suited music.
But all sizes, shapes and tastes. It is very rare to see such views - so i saved that in my noodle. In a contrast the music (watch it with no sound and see [feel] the difference] so to me that concludes that the narration & music could have been from the much speculated "alien invasion" TPTB/W plan.
(And by mentioning i am an accomplice...Doh!!!)
Maybe the limelight does change people....Mr E was a nice down to earth investigator when he first broke on the scene.
Etherios
8th July 2011, 21:02
Interesting that Mr. Escamilla would release this. I was under the impression that John Lenard Walson (A.K.A. " Gridkeeper ") was proven to be a fraud By Mr. escamilla himself on A.T.S. a few months ago.
That is correct, it all came out about the use of models etc when they had a major falling out,
Not to mention Mr. Escamilla's dubious discernment abilities.
Hurritt
Can you provide a link plz?
Ilie Pandia
8th July 2011, 21:07
This was a interesting video.
Looking at it, I realized that those "light shapes" look very much like my neighbor's light bulb when I would see it via a window with a rain drop on it. The imperfections in the glass and the "distorted lens" effect caused by the rain drop would make the light bulb alive. It's also similar to distant car lights in front of you, when you drive in a rainy night.
It would have been nice to make a short presentation of his equipment, and how was he zooming in on such objects. Some more clear background stars would have been nice too.
Another thing I don't get is why would a "ship" give of light? That would be such a waste of energy... unless that light is a reflection from the Sun. But the distances mentioned in the clip make that unlikely.
If those are real objects, and not optical problems, they do indeed look alive and not mechanical.
DeDukshyn
8th July 2011, 23:08
This was a interesting video.
Looking at it, I realized that those "light shapes" look very much like my neighbor's light bulb when I would see it via a window with a rain drop on it. The imperfections in the glass and the "distorted lens" effect caused by the rain drop would make the light bulb alive. It's also similar to distant car lights in front of you, when you drive in a rainy night.
It would have been nice to make a short presentation of his equipment, and how was he zooming in on such objects. Some more clear background stars would have been nice too.
Another thing I don't get is why would a "ship" give of light? That would be such a waste of energy... unless that light is a reflection from the Sun. But the distances mentioned in the clip make that unlikely.
If those are real objects, and not optical problems, they do indeed look alive and not mechanical.
Consider that we only see light as illumination, but it may be much much more than just that. I believe light carries far more information than just illumination - but in our limited sleves that's all we perceive it as ... Advanced spiritual teachings may tell you that you don't need physical eyes to see ... just something to consider.
I too would have like to see his equipment ...
Ilie Pandia
8th July 2011, 23:44
Another thing I don't get is why would a "ship" give of light? That would be such a waste of energy... unless that light is a reflection from the Sun. But the distances mentioned in the clip make that unlikely.
Consider that we only see light as illumination, but it may be much much more than just that. I believe light carries far more information than just illumination - but in our limited sleves that's all we perceive it as ... Advanced spiritual teachings may tell you that you don't need physical eyes to see ... just something to consider.
I too would have like to see his equipment ...
Hello DeDukshyn,
I agree with your comments. We "see" very little indeed. But that light that you don't need physical eyes to see, I don't think it can be captured with a telescope and a HD camcorder.
After my previous post, I've been thinking that just as or bodies give of Infra-Red light , there may be "things/beings/entities" out there that give of visible light just as naturally. So that light may be a side effect of their engine, their metabolism, state of "mind"... Could be. IF those are real :)
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.