ktlight
13th July 2011, 09:25
Battle of Britain II is about to begin
FYI:
tuart Littlewood argues that the cancer in the British body politic exposed by the crisis engulfing Rupert Murdoch’s media empire and ignited by the gutter tabloid News of the World’s phone hacking and police bribery scandal, is only the tip of the iceberg and that the British people must now wake up to the Zionist lobby’s deadly stranglehold on the UK.
Churchill, in his Battle of Britain speech 71 years ago, said:
If we can stand up to him [Hitler], all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age, made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science...
Today those "broad, sunlit uplands" of Churchill's are again shrouded in storm-clouds. Zionist infiltrators have succeeded where Hitler failed. The difference now is that the enemy’s invasion forces are not massing across the English Channel. They are already here in our midst and we are indeed on the brink of a new Dark Age, as the ruthless conspiracy masterminded by foreign interests expands its influence by stealth and by subversion and by intimidation.
America is sliding into the abyss fast as US congressmen repeatedly parade their abject subservience to the powerful pro-Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Who will forget the pathetic spectacle of 29 standing ovations they accorded the swaggering, lying, crazed Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, while he delivered his poison?
The question now is whether we in the UK can stand up to the encroaching menace and save "all that we have known and cared for", when we have so completely lost our moral bearings.
We duck our solemn responsibilities under the Geneva Conventions and give Zionist war criminals a safe haven immune from arrest.
We allow fanatics, such as Conservative Friends of Israel, to organize and promote the interests of the criminal Israeli regime at the very heart of Westminster government.
We allow MPs to place themselves under the influence of foreign interest groups and to abuse the principles that are supposed to underpin standards in public life.
We allow one community, Jews, to be hugely over-represented in our Parliament and to dominate key areas of our administration, including those related to security. If Muslims were over-represented to the same extent they’d have 200 seats and action would be taken.
We spend large amounts of treasure and send our troops to murder foreign civilians and die in foreign lands simply to support US-Israeli greed, destroying our own good name in the process.
We allow civil society's hard-earned savings to bail out Zionist bankers in distress and fund endless wars and the corporate and personal profits of those who promote wars.
Civil society’s fury
Last week we watched with satisfaction as media mogul and Zionist flag-waver Rupert Murdoch's stranglehold on the political scene in Britain came unglued after revelations of hacking into a murdered schoolgirl’s voicemail and other dirty tricks. But it wasn’t the “Establishment” or the police that taught Murdoch a much-needed lesson: it was a disgusted civil society whose anger eventually brought down the weight of the law and Parliament on the offenders' heads.
Politicians, from prime ministers down, wet their pants at the thought of how much damage Murdoch's gutter-sniping newspapers could do to them if they didn't bow and scrape to the over-mighty News Corporation. The News of the World, we were told so many times, had the power to make of break political careers.
That was only true, of course, if the politicians in question were weak and susceptible to pressure – and those are not the sort of politicians we want anyway. Blair and Cameron were at Murdoch's beck and call and socialized with his odious executives, including the scary Rebekah Brooks. Neither had the balls to curb the illegal practices
It finally came down to this. Who were our spineless politicians more scared of: the furious public or “Dirty Digger” Murdoch? Clearly, the British people need to show their outrage more often.
When we reach the age of 60 we cringe at how arrogant and ignorant we were at 40. So why saddle ourselves with a gullible 44-year-old prime minister, which is how old Blair was when he entered 10 Downing Street? Cameron was only 43.
Blair at first impressed by being a “Flash Harry” but in reality was so young, stupid and unprincipled that he became an acute embarrassment, bringing shame on Britain. Cameron is similarly “flash” and continually has to make desperate U-turns to reverse half-baked policies.
As with Blair, he’s a warmonger eager to make an impression on the back of someone else’s blood and shredded body parts. Prime Minister Cameron recently launched an extraordinary attack on “moaning” military chiefs who had dared to openly question the length of the war in Libya. In a public slap-down he told top brass: “You do the fighting and I’ll do the talking.” He added: “I’m absolutely confident that we can keep this pressure up. We can maintain this mission for as long as necessary. Time is on our side.” Arrogant pup, they probably thought.
Indeed. Those were the ill-considered words of a leader whose country is financially broke – and went broke while Cameron and his Conservative buddies were the official opposition charged with the duty of holding the governments of Blair and Brown to account.
source to read more
http://www.redress.cc/global/slittlewood20110712
FYI:
tuart Littlewood argues that the cancer in the British body politic exposed by the crisis engulfing Rupert Murdoch’s media empire and ignited by the gutter tabloid News of the World’s phone hacking and police bribery scandal, is only the tip of the iceberg and that the British people must now wake up to the Zionist lobby’s deadly stranglehold on the UK.
Churchill, in his Battle of Britain speech 71 years ago, said:
If we can stand up to him [Hitler], all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age, made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science...
Today those "broad, sunlit uplands" of Churchill's are again shrouded in storm-clouds. Zionist infiltrators have succeeded where Hitler failed. The difference now is that the enemy’s invasion forces are not massing across the English Channel. They are already here in our midst and we are indeed on the brink of a new Dark Age, as the ruthless conspiracy masterminded by foreign interests expands its influence by stealth and by subversion and by intimidation.
America is sliding into the abyss fast as US congressmen repeatedly parade their abject subservience to the powerful pro-Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Who will forget the pathetic spectacle of 29 standing ovations they accorded the swaggering, lying, crazed Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, while he delivered his poison?
The question now is whether we in the UK can stand up to the encroaching menace and save "all that we have known and cared for", when we have so completely lost our moral bearings.
We duck our solemn responsibilities under the Geneva Conventions and give Zionist war criminals a safe haven immune from arrest.
We allow fanatics, such as Conservative Friends of Israel, to organize and promote the interests of the criminal Israeli regime at the very heart of Westminster government.
We allow MPs to place themselves under the influence of foreign interest groups and to abuse the principles that are supposed to underpin standards in public life.
We allow one community, Jews, to be hugely over-represented in our Parliament and to dominate key areas of our administration, including those related to security. If Muslims were over-represented to the same extent they’d have 200 seats and action would be taken.
We spend large amounts of treasure and send our troops to murder foreign civilians and die in foreign lands simply to support US-Israeli greed, destroying our own good name in the process.
We allow civil society's hard-earned savings to bail out Zionist bankers in distress and fund endless wars and the corporate and personal profits of those who promote wars.
Civil society’s fury
Last week we watched with satisfaction as media mogul and Zionist flag-waver Rupert Murdoch's stranglehold on the political scene in Britain came unglued after revelations of hacking into a murdered schoolgirl’s voicemail and other dirty tricks. But it wasn’t the “Establishment” or the police that taught Murdoch a much-needed lesson: it was a disgusted civil society whose anger eventually brought down the weight of the law and Parliament on the offenders' heads.
Politicians, from prime ministers down, wet their pants at the thought of how much damage Murdoch's gutter-sniping newspapers could do to them if they didn't bow and scrape to the over-mighty News Corporation. The News of the World, we were told so many times, had the power to make of break political careers.
That was only true, of course, if the politicians in question were weak and susceptible to pressure – and those are not the sort of politicians we want anyway. Blair and Cameron were at Murdoch's beck and call and socialized with his odious executives, including the scary Rebekah Brooks. Neither had the balls to curb the illegal practices
It finally came down to this. Who were our spineless politicians more scared of: the furious public or “Dirty Digger” Murdoch? Clearly, the British people need to show their outrage more often.
When we reach the age of 60 we cringe at how arrogant and ignorant we were at 40. So why saddle ourselves with a gullible 44-year-old prime minister, which is how old Blair was when he entered 10 Downing Street? Cameron was only 43.
Blair at first impressed by being a “Flash Harry” but in reality was so young, stupid and unprincipled that he became an acute embarrassment, bringing shame on Britain. Cameron is similarly “flash” and continually has to make desperate U-turns to reverse half-baked policies.
As with Blair, he’s a warmonger eager to make an impression on the back of someone else’s blood and shredded body parts. Prime Minister Cameron recently launched an extraordinary attack on “moaning” military chiefs who had dared to openly question the length of the war in Libya. In a public slap-down he told top brass: “You do the fighting and I’ll do the talking.” He added: “I’m absolutely confident that we can keep this pressure up. We can maintain this mission for as long as necessary. Time is on our side.” Arrogant pup, they probably thought.
Indeed. Those were the ill-considered words of a leader whose country is financially broke – and went broke while Cameron and his Conservative buddies were the official opposition charged with the duty of holding the governments of Blair and Brown to account.
source to read more
http://www.redress.cc/global/slittlewood20110712