PDA

View Full Version : Breast Cancer Vaccine...you're going to love this one...



Kulapops
1st June 2010, 08:58
Am I the only one who might skeptically think they might try to give us a jab by hook or crook ??

No need for swine flu vaccination ? Have a cancer vaccine!

Everyone needs those.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1282655/Breast-cancer-jab-available-year.html

The real scary part is the bit where they say quite matter of factly...

The only drawback is that alpha-lactalbumin is also found in healthy breasts when they are producing milk – so a woman who has the jab while young could not breastfeed in the future, or her immune system would respond.

This should not affect her ability to have a baby, however.

Oh... well, that's alright then ???

No more breast milk for babies? Now why would you want to engineer a thing like that?.....

K

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Erm and here's another logic... if you can't use your breasts... what's the point of having them in the first place ???

Executive toys ????

K

Lucrum
1st June 2010, 11:52
Hmm...but it says: "so a woman who has the jab while young could not breastfeed in the future, or her immune system would respond." Why would the immune system respond to breastfeeding and not the actual production of milk?

I mean, it's not the actual breastfeeding that produces the milk...

Oh well, just as stupid as the HPV vaccine really....

Kulapops
1st June 2010, 22:31
Am I the only breast fixated poster here?

Seems to me if you've invented a vaccine that renders breasts 'inoperable' I would not write that down in my report as a 'minor drawback'.

Something that needs ironing out...

Before you know it we'll have a prostate vaccine that keeps you floppy.

K

Celine
1st June 2010, 22:41
Umm...wow..

Firts of all..breastfeeding is on a "supply demand basis" , the suckling does in a sense trigger the production of the milk.


The connection seems to be with a protein called alphalactalbumin...

Definetly worth looking into more..

thank you Kula..

Kulapops
1st June 2010, 22:48
Thanks Celine... I'm glad at least one woman's interest is piqued by this article...

I mean, the article state... that you get a wonderful immunity from breast cancer... but you will never be able to breastfeed ???

Erm... I'm a bloke.. so maybe I only see breasts in a certain light... but I feel sure that if I was a woman (as some say)... there is NO WAY I would be trading in an ability to breast feed ever..for a vaccine against cancer.

Or am I missing something ????

If I ran that research program.. I wouldn't be heralding a 'revolution'.. I'd be saying get back to the drawing board and don't come back until we've got the vaccine AND breastfeeding works.

K

Celine
1st June 2010, 22:54
I have no more fear of cancer. I know the cure now ...as do others ;)


Breastfeeding has always been a way to target women...and the unborn in a way.

I remeber seeing large billboards , advertizing bottle feeding when i visited africa ... i was 3 months pregnant at the time.

i was...mortified...

How will these women ina frica keep the bottles sterile?? afford the bottles themselves?

tne i saw who was advertising it...

Nestley...

i am sure they give each mother a start up kit...

sigh...

Kulapops
1st June 2010, 23:06
Exactly... I mean surely breastfeeding is a , well, I don't know... some kind of a human right. To invent a medicine that stops that seems, well, dubious to me.

So then you ask yourself, who benefits?

They say breastfeeding creates healthy babies...

Kulapops
1st June 2010, 23:40
I don't know.. maybe if I started a thread about breasts I'd get more response !!

Needs to do some more research.. maybe a few pictures to prove my point...

But if someone announced a vaccine that affected my tackle I'd be "Whooaaahhh Neddy !"

Can't believe this article gets by the daily mail AND THIS FORUM... and no one seems to mind...

Maybe you all figure that we've got Giant Tsunamis and Oil Leaks to come before the boobs fall off.. so no need to panic.

Me? Panic... ??? Where would we be if the boob was just a pound of flesh??

And had no function?

Ok... don't think about that too long.. some of the guys are breaking into a sweat already.

K

Hummingbird
2nd June 2010, 00:29
Besides the nutritional value of breast feeding( which is second to nothing if the mother is organic), Like pete peterson said along with many others, There are huge metaphysical implications for breast feeding. Being inside the mothers heart magnetic field is crucial to the baby's development. while breastfeeding the baby grows in this field. Blatantly obvious when they take the baby from the mother after only moments holding the baby she just spent 9 months creating. The child must stay in the bubble for 16 hours under a liquid similar to the fluid in the womb, for maximum development.

The controllers know this and start, to halt our potential at the earliest stage possible.. An understanding and agenda that I dont think was a human at its beginning

cloud9
2nd June 2010, 02:04
Dear Kulapops:
please don't be offended for what I'm going to say but yesterday or 2 days ago I saw an article in the internet where they were stating something like this: Dogs (puppies) who are being fed with human food get sick and die, more or less.
They argue that dogs should be fed only with dog's manufactured food, the ones from cans or bags.... hummm...
People around the world have given their food to their pets for centuries, dog's food factories just didn't exist and nowadays in many countries just the rich can afford to buy it so... and the funny thing is that dogs don't get cancer in other countries and if they do is very rare.
Now, regarding to cancer and everything that has to do with it, I'm sick to my stomach to see how people usually don't apply common sense anymore.
My first thought is that at least 99.999% of the population believe that "cancer cells" exist (thanks to the brainwashing of doctors and the media, etc.).
If we apply common sense, cells don't travel through the body, you see, toe cells don't go on vacation to the brain, kidney cells don't go to visit relatives to the stomach and eye cells don't go to the uterus. BUT we have been taught that cancer is something genetic so it's something we don't have control over it, what can you do when you were born with it? It's in your cell, your genes, in your DNA....

Common sense tells me that cancer is caused but a fungus or a virus so small that takes years to produce a tumor or growth a size than can be seen or detected but at that time the exponential growth is reaching a point where groups of individuals "leave" the primary colony to conquer other grounds and they travel through the blood and other body fluids and establish themselves in other organs, by the time this happens the colonies are so big that in a relatively short time the body is invaded.
I've known a few people with this terrible illness and I tell them my theory, they just look at me as if I'm a very wierd person and they keep on talking about what their doctor said of "my cancer cells".
I've lived in countries called 3er world or poor countries and the amount of people with cancer is really small, they don't have adds on tv telling people that 1 in 3 women will have breast cancer or that 1 in 5 people will have cancer at any stage of their lives, it's just here were this terrible brainwashing is happening, but you see, people don't use common sense....
people don't wonder why, why this illness is so common now, why, why. They accept what the tv says without questioning.
So if people see an add stating that a bottle is better than breast milk, they believe! If tv says you need a vaccine so you won't get cancer, they believe!
If babies need a bottle they sure would be born with it.

DonnaA
2nd June 2010, 02:37
Am I the only breast fixated poster here?

Seems to me if you've invented a vaccine that renders breasts 'inoperable' I would not write that down in my report as a 'minor drawback'.

Something that needs ironing out...

Before you know it we'll have a prostate vaccine that keeps you floppy.

K

It's only a minor drawback to the men who invented it... (if a woman invented it she needs to have her head examined)... How can they actually release something that will render a natural function of the body useless, or worse make your body think the natural production of milk is foreign substance?

This is perfect if you want to starve babies when/if the food supply runs out I suppose. :(


I mean, it's not the actual breastfeeding that produces the milk...

The more you breastfeed the more milk you produce... if you don't breastfeed you do not produce milk :)

Personally I will not take any vaccine... ever.

DonnaA
2nd June 2010, 02:47
Dear Kulapops:
please don't be offended for what I'm going to say but yesterday or 2 days ago I saw an article in the internet where they were stating something like this: Dogs (puppies) who are being fed with human food get sick and die, more or less.
They argue that dogs should be fed only with dog's manufactured food, the ones from cans or bags.... hummm...
People around the world have given their food to their pets for centuries, dog's food factories just didn't exist and nowadays in many countries just the rich can afford to buy it so... and the funny thing is that dogs don't get cancer in other countries and if they do is very rare.
Now, regarding to cancer and everything that has to do with it, I'm sick to my stomach to see how people usually don't apply common sense anymore.
My first thought is that at least 99.999% of the population believe that "cancer cells" exist (thanks to the brainwashing of doctors and the media, etc.).
If we apply common sense, cells don't travel through the body, you see, toe cells don't go on vacation to the brain, kidney cells don't go to visit relatives to the stomach and eye cells don't go to the uterus. BUT we have been taught that cancer is something genetic so it's something we don't have control over it, what can you do when you were born with it? It's in your cell, your genes, in your DNA....

Yep, they make us think we are imperfect.



Common sense tells me that cancer is caused but a fungus or a virus so small that takes years to produce a tumor or growth a size than can be seen or detected but at that time the exponential growth is reaching a point where groups of individuals "leave" the primary colony to conquer other grounds and they travel through the blood and other body fluids and establish themselves in other organs, by the time this happens the colonies are so big that in a relatively short time the body is invaded.

I believe it caused by stress added to the crap they put in the foods we eat... plus the "programming"... If you believe you will get cancer, then you probably will. Thoughts are things.



I've known a few people with this terrible illness and I tell them my theory, they just look at me as if I'm a very wierd person and they keep on talking about what their doctor said of "my cancer cells".
I've lived in countries called 3er world or poor countries and the amount of people with cancer is really small, they don't have adds on tv telling people that 1 in 3 women will have breast cancer or that 1 in 5 people will have cancer at any stage of their lives, it's just here were this terrible brainwashing is happening, but you see, people don't use common sense....
people don't wonder why, why this illness is so common now, why, why. They accept what the tv says without questioning.
So if people see an add stating that a bottle is better than breast milk, they believe! If tv says you need a vaccine so you won't get cancer, they believe!
If babies need a bottle they sure would be born with it.

TV is a bad, bad thing. I can hardly watch tv anymore.

I agree with you... if they tell you it is good, most will blindly agree with them.

What if they were to just tell the truth? Wouldn't that be a wonderful thing! :)

TigaHawk
2nd June 2010, 05:19
Did they seriously just say they created a cancer vaccine, but the downside is it will make the mother's immune system attack their own breast if they try to produce milk for their child?

.............................................................................

I wish you guy's were more geeky, then you'd understand /Facepalm :(

Kulapops
2nd June 2010, 14:38
Yes.. it's weird and it's mad... this should be front page.. if only for how morally wrong it is.. not for the 'success' it heralds..

K

conk
2nd June 2010, 15:21
Let's see. It's minimally effective, has many side effects, and is costly. Yep, sure fire recipe for success in the drug business!

Kulapops
3rd June 2010, 01:11
Breasts must surely one of the best inventions ever invented.

I mean, I thought Bicycles were cool. And the Rubiks cube was pretty awesome. I even learned how to handle that baby.

But breasts?! We are talking 11th dimensional stuff here.

So some geek with an oedipus complex comes up with a cancer vaccine that means you can't use your hooters...and I'm immediately suspicious.

Sadly, it seems it's just the Kula and a small handful ( oo-er Missus) who are concerned about this...

Whereas the majority are far more concerned about Channeling.. an Ahstar Bajii with Naan bread...a sink hole with no plug and oil be seeing you in oil the old familiar places.

Well.. you get the future you concentrate on .. or the one you haven't paid attention to.

Watch out, I say.

NHS Summary Care Record ? No one gives a monkeys.

Boob-redundancy? why not.

Well, you heard it here first.

Your call.

K

Maybe you'd rather hear a bedtime story....

TigaHawk
5th June 2010, 12:17
Oh shoot...

Just thought of something...

Gearing up to 2012..... One of the possible aims for the PTB is population controll.

Now what would be an excelent thing to help ensure that the survivors dont go breeding and repopulating?

How do you feed a newborn baby without breastmilk?

(without suppliments and all that crap....)

:(