PDA

View Full Version : Who Are The Bankers That Benefit From The Norway Terror Attacks?



ktlight
27th July 2011, 19:00
FYI:

Last week’s terror attacks in Norway shattered the heart of a peace-loving society, which up until this point, was considered a model for other societies to follow. Despite their socialist form of government, Norwegians cherish their sovereignty and independence. Some say their standard of living is one of the best in the world. Perhaps is due to the fact that their government still represents their interests. They chose not to be part of the European Union in two different referendums some time ago because they know their history; they have been dominated by foreign governments in the past and they don’t want their old problems to return.
One of the terror suspects was a crazed man by the name of Anders Behring Breivik. He was the son of a nurse and a Norwegian diplomat who used to work at the London embassy. The media is reporting that Breivik was an anti-immigration islamophobe and a supporter of the PPP/C or People’s Progress Party/Civic. The PPP/C has been labeled as an ‘extremist organization’ by the EU Police or Europol along with other political parties (that happen to be opposed to ‘mainstream’ trade or immigration policies) throughout Europe. Despite being labeled as extremists, the Progress Party is still gaining political momentum, and is still winning elections. Odd isn’t it?
Yesterday, alleged terrorist Breivik had his day in court, and just as he started to mention that he had accomplices in the attacks, the judge silenced him and order him to 4 weeks in isolation before his trial. Why? Wouldn’t the people of Norway have a right to know who helped that crazed man carry out the terror attacks? It is obvious that he had assistance; the attacks had to require some level of sophistication and professional planning. But rather than focusing on Breivik’s background, because we may never know the whole truth about him, let’s examine who benefits from these horrendous attacks.
Last year, during the Cancun Global ‘Climate Change Summit, the Norway government, headed by Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, leader of the Labour Party, agreed to participate in a carbon tax pilot program, endorsed by the UN and George Soros. The program is called REDD, which is acronym for ‘Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation.’ In this carbon tax program, Norway would send anywhere from $250 million (U.S. Dollars) to $500 million from Norwegian tax payers to the government of Guyana in South America in order to promote rainforest conservation programs. The money would be collected by the World Bank, then siphoned trough the Inter-American Bank of Development to eventually reach the government of Guyana.
However, instead of using the money to ‘save the trees’ of the Amazon rainforest, the Guyana government and the Inter American Bank of Development decided to use the carbon tax money to build a hydro-electric dam called the Amalia Falls Project. Upon receiving the money, the Guyanan government granted a contract to a company called Synergy Holdings Inc., headed by a shady character by the name of Makeshwar Motilall, aka Fip or Flip.
Not too long after that, the local Guyana media accused Motilall of being a fraud. They also found out that the office for Synergy Holdings was an abandoned old house. Fip began to take money from the cookie jar and failed to report where he was spending it. Five million dollars of contract money disappeared. The scandal in Guyana began. The Norwegian Progress Party party, which was against this project from the beginning, began to mobilize to stop all funding for it. They wrote an open letter criticizing the project and the Labour Party, and the fact that they are denouncing this carbon tax scam for what it really is has helped them gain political power.
The Guyana government backpedaled and announced they gave the contract to another company called Sithe Global, which is owned by the Rothchild-family-controlled Blackstone Group. Fip’s contract was downgraded to only build the roads leading to the dam. However, the Norwegian Progress Party still wasn’t convinced.
Then later, under mysterious circumstances, ‘Fip’ Motilall attempted to ‘commit suicide’ in Palm Beach, Florida on July of 2010. He was taken to a mental health clinic for phychological treatment. A few months later, he went back to Guyana and his vehicle flipped (no pun intended) and went over a 40-foot cliff, but yet, he survived! Talk about a cockroach that won’t die!
Overall, the carbon tax pilot program was a failure and a major embarrassment for the Norwegian government, the international banks, and the government contractors involved in that scam. Forget the money; they have all the money in the world. This was supposed to be their pilot program and it failed! As a result, the People’s Progress Party became the number one obstacle for the carbon tax promoters. The EU Police (Europol) began to label them as terrorists. Their Facebook page was hacked earlier this month. Then suddenly, last Friday, a terrorist (who happens to be a Progress Party supporter) by the name of Anders Behring Breivik bombs the government building and kills a bunch of socialist kids in an island. The news media outlets worldwide have been unleashed and they are accusing those who support the Progress Party of being extremists, racists, islamophobes and even terrorists. Using the media propaganda as a tool, these terror attacks have effectively neutralized the Progress Party and their supporters, those who ‘deny’ climate change, those who oppose illegal immigration, higher taxes and the outsourcing of jobs. In the eyes of the world, these people are now terrorists for agreeing with Anders Behring Breivik. So now they won’t have any political leverage to oppose the carbon tax programs.

source
http://deadlinelive.info/2011/07/26/deadline-live-exclusive-who-are-the-bankers-that-benefit-from-the-norway-terror-attacks/

Flash
27th July 2011, 19:14
Well well well, interesting. The R banksters could not get the money through the traditional "barrage" ;)(wink to Canadian reading French) so they will get it with other means, or destroy the non supplier.

I had heard of this Guyana dam story because Canadian companies that are the best in the world in hydro dams could not get a hand on it. Despite answering to all requirements and bidding low. It was a small "shi..tty something"(the first enterprise) which got it. They knew something was not kosher. .. a way of talking, may be it was kosher :confused:

PS: for others: barrage has two meanings: barrage of police in the street stopping everybody to check your identity for example, a barrage is a stop put in place to get something or to stop the flow of something. The same word is used to mean a dam.

Lord Sidious
27th July 2011, 19:25
The guy that wrote that is a nugget.
For one thing, the Norwegian government like most others does what IT want's, not necessarily what the people want.
And Norway a model for other nations? With huge taxation and immigration issues like other scandinavian nations, I don't think so Tim.
Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland have no go areas in their cities where even the police are wary of entry.
The rape and abuse of the women of those nations by immigrants is something that you need to read up on if you are not aware of it.
I know a guy who fled Finland because he was going to be jailed for telling the nation that the rapist ring that was causing trouble at the time was made up of immigrants, not locals.
His name is Henrik Holappa.
In Sweden, they regularly edit pictures of criminals where they not only blank out their faces, but change their skin colour to hide their non Swedish origins.
So the thing is, the locals have to tolerate this as the ''authorities'' won't help them and if they speak out, they are accused of racism and all type of things.
The Norwegians, Swedes and Danes are my kinsman and I don't appreciate how the women are treated. At all and if people think I am being racist, I don't care about that either.
I would be angry even if they were not my kinsmen of course, but whatever, this is what ''they'' want, as this inflames the entire ''racism'' topic and puts people against each other.
I say this, if a ''refugee'' is in ANY nation and becomes a problem for that nation, they have NO business being there.

Flash
27th July 2011, 19:43
LS, Norway does look like Canada then, and the only more vocal about these problems are French Canadians here and guess what, French Canadian are listed as being outerly racists in other provinces, when in fact they just call a horse a horse or a bandit a bandit, whatever its color or origin. They also refused in greater number to be abiding by customs that are from other lands (the sharia for example that was already accepted in Ontario and would have pass if it weren't for international opposition and pressure, but absolutely rejected in Quebec). And God knows how soft our opposing views are in fact, how politically correct we are most of the time, wanting to accept all as equal, being often ostracised if speaking loud against anybody. So when French Canadian get against something, it is because it has gone quite far.

As for women, Canada is probably one of the best country in the world to be as a woman, immigrants or not.

That tells me that most Nordic countries have similar systems (including heavy taxes) and have a standard of political correctness so high that it makes adaptation to new environments almost impossible.

LS do you mean foreigners abusing Norwegian women or their own??

Lord Sidious
27th July 2011, 20:21
The ''refugees'' and their offspring Flash.
In Norway for example, rape shot up to a point never seen before.
And it isn't actual Norwegians doing it, it is the aliens.
I too speak my mind, as most of you see and I care not for peoples ''sensibilities'' as they say.
I am for the truth, regardless of how hard it is to chew and digest.
That being said, I have been to some places on my journey for truth that you guys would never believe.
So I have a perspective that I doubt any other member here has.
If you guys and girls have a backbone and call a spade a spade and people can't deal with that, then too bad for them.

Flash
27th July 2011, 20:33
That being said, I have been to some places on my journey for truth that you guys would never believe.
So I have a perspective that I doubt any other member here has.


Same here, but I bet they are not the same places nor the same situations. So a lot of times I do not talk because I will be caught in disbeliefs and argumentation that are not worth it. And for quite a lot of those situations, one has have to experience it to truly understand - sometimes years later, imho.

This being said, I sincerely think that some cultures do not fit well with some other cultures, they are antogonistic, destroying each other. This has been demonstrated as well by reputed experts in cross cultural differences (Hoffstede amongst others and a acquaintance of mine, Dr Zaynep Ayçan, specialist in the field, in Turkey).

Lord Sidious
27th July 2011, 20:42
Why do you think ''they'' forcibly put those cultures together?

Flash
27th July 2011, 21:07
Why do you think ''they'' forcibly put those cultures together?

This is quite multi facetted and cannot be answered in a post. To arrive at a conclusion, the facettes have to be seen and understood.

Lord Sidious
27th July 2011, 21:12
Why do you think ''they'' forcibly put those cultures together?

This is quite multi facetted and cannot be answered in a post. To arrive at a conclusion, the facettes have to be seen and understood.

Oh, I can give you the main reason in one line.
To divide and conquer.
There are other reasons too, monetary mostly, but that is the main reason.
''They'' play one group off the other and enjoy the fun.