Secret United Nations UFO Meeting

[The One]

Remember this

Secret United Nations UFO Meeting

A French aviation expert has come forward to reveal his participation in a secret meeting held at the United Nations New York headquarters that discussed the UFO phenomenon from February 12-14. Gilles Lorant is an attaché to the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS- National Center for Scientific Research) which is a government-funded research organization, under the administrative authority of France's Ministry of Research.

He is also a member Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense (IHEDN - the French Organization that produced the 1999 COMETA Report). Both CNRS and IHEDN are prestigious scientific organizations in France, and Lorant was invited to attend the UN meetings in a professional capacity.

A report released by a French UFO organization (Federation of European Airplane ), of which Lorant is an executive member, contained a summary of the UN meeting where he describes what happened at the meeting.

Lorant revealed that a series of UN meetings were held over a three day period. In the meetings there was discussion of a confidential report, prepared by the U.S. Air Force and a branch of the National Guard, concerning the societal impact of UFO sightings. The initial meeting was held on February 12 and, according to Lorant's report, led to a request by three U.S. Senators for further discussions. Additional meetings were held immediately after on February 13 and 14.

The implication is that three U.S. Senators attended the secret UN meetings. The meetings were very concerned about social upheaval from continued UFO sightings and the testimonies of individuals claiming to have first hand knowledge about UFO's, extraterrestrial life, and future global events. It was reported that adverse public reactions to UFO sightings could have a dramatic economic impact that could lead to recessions in some countries.

The emphasis on possible societal upheaval due to growing UFO sightings was reminiscent of recommendations of the 1953 Robertson Panel, convened by the CIA, which identified adverse public reactions as a major security threat that could be exploited by foreign enemies. The UN discussions appeared to match concerns identified in both the 1953 Robertson Panel http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_robertsonpanel.htm and the 1961 Brookings Report to the U.S. Congress, over ramifications of UFO reports and the eventual discovery of extraterrestrial life.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/exopolitica/esp_exopolitics_ZZZZZS.htm

http://exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-67.htm

[onawah]

The meeting was held in 2008.
It helps when posting information of this nature to give the date, so readers will know how current it is.

[The One]

The meeting was held in 2008.
It helps when posting information of this nature to give the date, so readers will know how current it is.


The meeting was held in 2008

You dont say
Are you having a laugh onawawh you are so picky with things.




It helps when posting information of this nature to give the date, so readers will know how current it is

All information on dates are provided in the links.Your comment is of no purpose

[Omni]

The meeting was held in 2008.
It helps when posting information of this nature to give the date, so readers will know how current it is.


The meeting was held in 2008

You dont say
Are you having a laugh onawawh you are so picky with things.




It helps when posting information of this nature to give the date, so readers will know how current it is

All information on dates are provided in the links.Your comment is of no purpose

I think it's valid to post in the thread what year it was in personally. I don't think onawah was putting you down or anything. I didn't goto the links. I often only read what people write in threads where they post links and videos. It's mind control, but regardless I do like descriptions in threads to be as all encompassing as possible.

Hope you don't take this personal or anything the one.. I fully respect you. I just think you are wrong in this occurrence.

[The One]

Hope you don't take this personal or anything the one.. I fully respect you. I just think you are wrong in this occurrence.

I dont take it personal my friend.

Its just if some members took the time to look at the links all the information is in there.Maybe i am different i check the links before i comment.Most people understand its just a pity some people need to see it before they even bother to check the links.

I have been posting on this forum long enough to realise who picks at the slightest of things.The comment was irrelevant as all the information was in the links.


I just think you are wrong in this occurrence

I will have to disagree on that one my friend

P.S Can i suggest in future any members that want to make a comment on issues re the above PM the member instead of posting it on the thread for everyone to see because the thread then goes totaly off topic and becomes a dicussion about it.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[onawah]

No, I was not having a laugh and I was just making a suggestion, which was in no way meant as a criticism. I'm sorry you took this personally.

I had a recent experience where I assumed an item that someone had posted was several years old. It was about TSA, and I have been posting TSA attrocities as they occur on my Facebook page because I want people to wake up and realize what is happening with our freedoms and do something about it.

I just assumed the story was current, and I went and posted it on Facebook, before realizing I should have checked the date first. And then when I did check and realized how old it was, I felt it was necessary to go back and remove it.
It bothers me too that it is often very difficult to find the dates on articles on the Net, and especially on Youtube.

Many stories lose a certain amount of relevance, especially when they are years old. For some information, the date isn't so important, but sometimes "old news" just doesn't pack the same wallop as something that is current.

And I see it as a courtesy, when someone is posting an article, to let the readers know the date, so everyone doesn't have to go looking to find out when the article was written, or when the event occurred.

I personally like the "picky" standards that Bill Ryan set for Project Avalon.
For me, it helps to set PA apart from many other forums where bickering, name calling, inaccuracy and so on is rampant.
I hope that that doesn't become the norm on PA. z
This space can be used for so much more important activity, exchange of information and mutual support.

There's a current thread on the subject of how we have been interacting with each other here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?26419-This-forum-leaves-a-bad-taste&p=272621#post272621

[The One]

And I see it as a courtesy, when someone is posting an article, to let the readers know the date, so everyone doesn't have to go looking to find out when the article was written, or when the event occurred

onawah i totally understand what you are saying but it takes all of a couple of seconds to click on the link to find the information out i always provide that.On many occasions when i post a new thread i do not provide all the information like dates,But i will always provide links so the members can do their own research.

We wiil have to agree to disagree on this one

Lets hope we can now get back the main topic

[fox.mulder]

This little banter of comments is why we humans dont usually get invited to the civilised being parties. Each persons ego just keeps getting bruised and needs soothing.

[DNA]

Watching a bunch of youtube videos takes forever. Not everyone has the time to do that.
It is kind of better to give a brief summary of the material, including an opinion if you have one about the validity of the material.
No reason to be coy if you've watched the video, we want to hear what you think about it.

[DNA]

This little banter of comments is why we humans dont usually get invited to the civilised being parties. Each persons ego just keeps getting bruised and needs soothing.

Can you imagine how rediculously quiet and repetitive these threads would get if we all agreed all the time? :) LOL
The human situation is what it is, don't assume interplanetary beings are above such things. We are all incarnating in the 3D plane for one reason, and that is so our souls can continue learning with the addition of an ego to deal with.

[onawah]

I appreciate sticking to the main topic.

This thread has already been derailed a little, and I apologize if I contributed to that, but it has also touched on another topic which seems to be vitally important to PA at this time, which is how we are treating each other. Since the thread I mentioned in my last post:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...621#post272621

has now been closed by the Mods, I am going to start another thread, entitled "Love" which I hope will provide a venue for more positive dialogue concerning this other topic. It's at:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?26471-LOVE-dedicated-to-Brian-O-Leary&p=273017#post273017

¤=[Post Update]=¤



This little banter of comments is why we humans dont usually get invited to the civilised being parties. Each persons ego just keeps getting bruised and needs soothing.

Can you imagine how rediculously quiet and repetitive these threads would get if we all agreed all the time? :) LOL
The human situation is what it is, don't assume interplanetary beings are above such things. We are all incarnating in the 3D plane for one reason, and that is so our souls can continue learning with the addition of an ego to deal with.

Agreed! I don't get the sense that the ETs agree about everything either! Though I imagine they have better ways of dealing with disagreements and conflicts. We can certainly stand a lot of improvement in that department.

[Maia Gabrial]

SOOOOOOO, if UFO's don't exist as they say, what's up with the UN's Alien Embassador position? THAT reveals alot, don't you think?

[the trojan]

Hope you don't take this personal or anything the one.. I fully respect you. I just think you are wrong in this occurrence.

I dont take it personal my friend.

Its just if some members took the time to look at the links all the information is in there.Maybe i am different i check the links before i comment.Most people understand its just a pity some people need to see it before they even bother to check the links.

I have been posting on this forum long enough to realise who picks at the slightest of things.The comment was irrelevant as all the information was in the links.


I just think you are wrong in this occurrence

I will have to disagree on that one my friend

P.S Can i suggest in future any members that want to make a comment on issues re the above PM the member instead of posting it on the thread for everyone to see because the thread then goes totaly off topic and becomes a dicussion about it.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

very interesting ,I just started a thread on a similar topic,I think you may be on to something,Ha!
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?26523-public-admonishment&p=273514#post273514

[Ontarioguy]

From what I have been seeing from the sidelines, it appears that there are MANY FLAVOURS of personalites within the Avalon site. And that sets the stage often for missunderstandings amongst one another. Specially when communicating online with typing only. It is much like chat, where one cannot hear or see the others tone and or expressions. And what often occurs is one might take or interpret the others "wording" in a way that is nowhere near what the sender was implying or getting at. Always best to check with that person IF POSSIBLE, before making assumptions as to what they were getting at. Plus on this site there are people from many different cultures and who use different languages as well. But through it all we are ALL pretty much the same......common folk just trying to get by and make sense of things in an uncommon world.

[Maia Gabrial]

Maybe Disclosure should come from the UN.... since they now have an Alien Embassador. Did they think they could slip this by us, too?

[The One]

Found some important documents that i posted in another thread that the UN should take not of

SYMPOSIUM ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
HEARINGS
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND ASTRONAUTICS
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NINETIETH CONGRESS
http://www.project1947.com/shg/symposium/index.html

ALSO STATEMENT BY STANTON T. FRIEDMAN
http://www.project1947.com/shg/symposium/friedman.html

[Tane Mahuta]

Maybe Disclosure should come from the UN.... since they now have an Alien Embassador. Did they think they could slip this by us, too?


Maia, I beleive that we as a human race need to find our own facts as regards to Disclosure. Don't beleive

for a moment that the UN or Govts will disclose anything.......if they do, it will probably be fabricated.


nuff said

TM