PDA

View Full Version : US attacks Iraq despite mission's end



ktlight
17th August 2011, 07:54
FYI:

The American military acknowledges that it has launched two unilateral airstrikes in Iraq in June, almost a year after President Barack Obama declared an end to the US combat mission in the country.


The spokesman for the US military in Iraq, Brigadier General Jeffrey Buchanan, said on Tuesday that the air raids had been carried out against militants targeting American troops, AFP reported.

This is the first time the US army has acknowledged using air power to attack targets in Iraq since the American government ended its combat mission in the country in August 31, 2010.

Referring to the first US strike against a group of militants attacking a US base near the Basra airport, Buchanan said, “We had a team of Apaches (helicopters) up at the time. They identified the guy firing the rockets, they engaged and killed him.”

In the second airstrike, US forces killed two militants who planned to explode a roadside bomb on the way of US convoys, he added.

The confirmation may spark tensions between Baghdad and Washington because any unilateral US military attack violates the security pact signed between the two sides last year.

Under the accord, Iraq would oversee security operations in its territory, with the US forces only authorized to play a supportive role.

The comments by the US military spokesman come a day after a series of bombing attacks in different Iraqi cities killed at least 76 people and injured over 180 others.

Bombings and other forms of violence have become an almost daily occurrence in Iraq as the US government has made no secret of its strong desire to extend its military presence in the war-torn country beyond the December 2011 withdrawal date.

About 46,000 American troops are still stationed in Iraq while Baghdad has agreed to hold negotiations with Washington on the future status of American forces in the country.


source
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/194283.html

Foggy
17th August 2011, 08:47
I don't believe this report. Take note....no one had the guts to author it. LAMESTREAM PROPAGANDA.



This is the first time the US army has acknowledged using air power to attack targets in Iraq since the American government ended its combat mission in the country in August 31, 2010.

What politician said this?
since the American government ended its combat mission in the country in August 31, 2010.
or this bold face lie?
beyond the December 2011 withdrawal date.



Bombings and other forms of violence have become an almost daily occurrence in Iraq as the US government has made no secret of its strong desire to extend its military presence in the war-torn country beyond the December 2011 withdrawal date.

How could anyone believe this when the LARGEST Embassy in the WORLD was built in Iraq by Cheney's buddies?

Not to mention the 3 humongous PERMANENT MILITARY BARRACKS AND COMPOUNDS.

Leave Iraq? When pigs fly over Baghdad....maybe 50 Years or more like John McCain said when he was running for President.

ktlight
17th August 2011, 08:54
Hi Foggy,

The spokesman for the US military in Iraq, Brigadier General Jeffrey Buchanan
And the authors of the piece were MAB/MGH
The date was Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:12AM GMT

Foggy
17th August 2011, 09:23
Thanks, ktlight.

Anytime an article is published without a full name and date....(person or persons who wrote it) the story is designed to convince/confuse the public and is merely propaganda/marketing. Bernays changed that term to "Public Relations". He devised a plan to make it acceptable for women to smoke. During the Easter Parade in 1929 --- Photographers were all lined up as a cluster of women stopped walking, lifted their skirts to their thighs to take a cigarette from their garter and light up. The caption in all the papers was:
"Torches of Freedom".
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/288980/the_torches_of_freedom_campaign_marketing.html

Anytime I'm ready to read something I search for 2 things before I decide if the article
is worth my time. 1. The date of the publication - 2. Who authored it? If either are not published visibly, I know
it's BS and Bernays style trickery. Writers are proud of their work and they want to be known or paid.