PDA

View Full Version : Study shows powerful corporations really do control the world's finances



Carmody
20th August 2011, 06:39
Study shows powerful corporations really do control the world's finances


http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hires/2011/cliplsdkfsdfs.jpg

Network topology with a zoom on some major transnational corporations in the financial sector.


For many years conventional wisdom has said that the whole world is controlled by the monied elite, or more recently by the huge multi-national corporations that seem to sometime control the very air we breathe. Now, new research by a team based in ETH-Zurich, Switzerland, has shown that what we’ve suspected all along, is apparently true. The team has uploaded their results onto the preprint server arXiv.

Using data obtained (circa 2007) from the Orbis database (a global database containing financial information on public and private companies) the team, in what is being heralded as the first of its kind, analyzed data from over 43,000 corporations, looking at both upstream and downstream connections between them all and found that when graphed, the data represented a bowtie of sorts, with the knot, or core representing just 147 entities who control nearly 40 percent of all of monetary value of transnational corporations (TNCs).

In this analysis the focus was on corporations that have ownership in their own assets as well as those of other institutions and who exert influence via ownership in second, third, fourth, etc. tier entities that hold influence over others in the web, as they call it; the interconnecting network of TNCs that together make up the whole of the largest corporations in the world. In analyzing the data they found, and then in building the network maps, the authors of the report sought to uncover the structure and control mechanisms that make up the murky world of corporate finance and ownership.

To zero in on the significant controlling corporations, the team started with a list of 43,060 TNCs taken from a sample of 30 million economic “actors” in the Orbis database. They then applied a recursive algorithm designed to find and point out all of the ownership pathways between them all. The resulting TNC network produced a graph with 600,508 nodes and 1,006,987 ownership connections. The team then graphed the results in several different ways to show the different ways that corporate ownership is held; the main theme in each, showing that just a very few corporations through direct and indirect ownership (via stocks, bonds, etc.) exert tremendous influence over the actions of those corporations, which in turn exert a huge impact on the rest of us.

The authors conclude their report by asking, perhaps rhetorically, what are the implications of having so few exert so much influence, and perhaps more importantly, in an economic sense, what the implications are of such a structure on market competitiveness.

More information: The network of global corporate control, Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder, Stefano Battiston, arXiv:1107.5728v1 [q-fin.GN] http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5728

Abstract
The structure of the control network of transnational corporations affects global market competition and financial stability. So far, only small national samples were studied and there was no appropriate methodology to assess control globally. We present the first investigation of the architecture of the international ownership network, along with the computation of the control held by each global player. We find that transnational corporations form a giant bow-tie structure and that a large portion of control flows to a small tightly-knit core of financial institutions. This core can be seen as an economic "super-entity" that raises new important issues both for researchers and policy makers.

Via Sciencenews.org

lightseeker
21st August 2011, 19:28
Thanks Carmody for this information. I am not surprised by these findings.
Lightseeker

nearing
21st August 2011, 19:33
Pretty sure we did not need a study to 'prove' this.

Flash
22nd August 2011, 03:48
Thanks Carmody. Although we intuitively knew it, it is very nice to see a study proving it. It will be nice to use with the sceptics that always are asking for scientific proofs, instead of being judged as conspirationist of paranoid.

thanks

panopticon
22nd August 2011, 06:37
G'day All,

While it is a common held belief that a central group of corporations and their directors hold massive sway over media, finance and analysis it is, in my opinion, very important for this "common understanding" to be illustrated by good, statistical analysis and supporting evidence.

The reason I say this is that without this evidence it is difficult for the main stream user to be able to accept that it occurs.

In any conversation it is difficult to put a point across without evidence. An example could run like this:


Person 1: "It has been commonly understood that an elite exists that control both the means of production and the capital base."
Person 2: "That is just fear mongering. There is no conspiracy, no shadowy group trying to control, anyone who says so are deluded."
Person 1: "Marx called them the bourgeoisie, or capitalist class. It is really self evident, when we look at the world, that this is the case."
Person 2: "There are those who work hard and get ahead and those who don't, so don't. Simple. It's just the good ol' protestant work ethic."
Person 1: "So there's no "haves" or "have nots" in this world, just lazy people and not lazy people?"
Person 2: "Seems obvious to me."

Now, with the ability to use this statistical data set intermixed, it no long is a case of "fear mongering" but rather a representation of the data.

Why would this be useful?

Well I imagine that Dennis (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?24637-The-Reset-Button) might be able to use it as a means of gaining interest for his proposed "reset button (http://www.resetbutton2011.org/)" legislation, or part of it (say the "revolving door element") at the very least, in the US.

The use of cold hard fact, as opposed to conjecture, only aids an arguments position.
I am not saying that "conjecture" does not have its place. Quite the opposite.
I view the "what, where, when, why, how and who" questions to be the most important and they, to me, are the conjecture element.
Then: Proof is needed to substantiate a claim.
In some instances this may not be possible. So the research ends up at a dead end.
Then return to the "what, where, when, why, how and who" question and look at it from a different angle.

Also it presents a unique way of viewing the "flow" of ownership. For Example:

Local (State or Federal) legislature does not allow foreign corporations to own controlling shares in a certain utility.
A foreign corporation creates a level of abstraction from the utility by buying shares in other local "entities" (corporations, businesses, banks) that they can gain large number of shares in (maybe not controlling interests but influential).
These diverse and unrelated local "entities" then are able to purchase shares in the local utility and the interests of the foreign owners are represented. The foreign corp does not hold explicit control but does have implicit control by financial control/influence of these "entities".

In the paper the statement '[i]t is clear, that root nodes accumulat[e] all the control' (p. 23) presents in no uncertain terms that the control of finances (and from this power) is focused in a limited number of corporations. From this it is not unreasonable to say that power is focused within the hands of a limited number of individuals.

This also applies to what the paper refers to as 'the rich club phenomenon' (p. 31) however to a lesser degree, as weighting of interconnection and control is varied, 'the core of the TNC [trans-national corporate] network could be seen as a generalization of the rich club phenomenon with control in the role of degree' (p. 32).

The positioning of the global "actors" (Table S1, p. 33) presents empirical evidence that supports the statement "they do not carry out their business in isolation but, on the contrary, they are tied together in an extremely entangled web of control" (p. 32). I generally refer to this phenomena as "MCP" (money, control, power) and this paper presents empirical evidence that supports this.

Thank you Carmody for bringing it to our attention.

Kind Regards, :yo:
Panopticon

Sources:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5728
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?24637-The-Reset-Button
http://www.resetbutton2011.org/

Christine Breese
23rd August 2011, 01:37
Did you know it was reported recently that Apple has more money than the USA now? Oh, well, hmmm... I guess that's a no-brainer. The USA is broke and everyone is still just pretending, yeah, raise the debt ceiling, now we have more money. What's wrong with this picture?