PDA

View Full Version : Prince warns Saudi Royal family "To step down and flee"



Grizzom
13th June 2010, 00:45
http://i45.tinypic.com/23vayb.jpg

Prince warns Saudi Arabia of apocalypse

Saudi Prince Turki bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud has warned the country's royal family to step down and flee before a military coup or a popular uprising overthrows the kingdom.

In a letter published by Wagze news agency on Tuesday, the Cairo-based prince warned Saudi Arabia's ruling family of a fate similar to that of Iraq's executed dictator Saddam Hussein and the ousted Iranian Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, calling on them to escape before people "cut off our heads in streets."

He warned that the Saudi royal family is no longer able to "impose" itself on people, arguing that deviations in carrying out the religious concepts that make up the basis of the Saudi government "have gotten out of our hands," so that the opposition views our acts as "interfering in people's private life and restricting their liberties."

"If we are wise, we must leave this country to its people, whose dislike for us is increasing," said Prince Turki, advising Saudi officials to escape with their families.

"Do it today before tomorrow as long as the money we have is enough for us to live anywhere in the world; from Switzerland to Canada and Australia…we should not return as long as we are able to get out safely, we must take our families quickly and pull out," he urged.

"Do not fool yourself by relying on the United States or Britain or Israel, because they will not survive the loss; the only door open is now the exit door of no return. Let us go before it closes."

He finally warned against a military coup against the ruling family, saying "no one will attack us from outside but our armed forces will attack us."

Prince Turki is a member of the liberal Free Princes movement founded in the 1950s amid tensions between King Faisal and his brother King Saud, requesting the Saudi authorities to implement political reforms and set out a constitution.

The late King Faisal expelled members of the civil rights group to Egypt but later on pardoned them.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=129692&sectionid=351020205



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Kpm-yHCzw&feature=PlayList&p=B4E9969F71E68D3E&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=101

Saudi Arabia is considered the most 'Islamic' nation and everything it does is used to judge Islam and its Kings are supported and encouraged and are old friends of Kuffar leaders.

I hear the Saudi King gave Israel the go ahead to bomb Iran!

Think about the fallout thats coming, when the word gets out that a "Muslim King is telling Jews it's ok to kill Muslim's"

Where's the Saudi royal family going to go?

"Remember the Shaw of Iran and that fiasco"


http://i45.tinypic.com/2w68288.jpg

MargueriteBee
13th June 2010, 02:17
I am simply astounded. It feels like a movie today.

These are bloodline families and they are running? Somethings big is going on behind the scenes.

Majorion
13th June 2010, 02:44
These are bloodline families and they are running?
We must be careful from articles that lead the reader to believe certain things are happening when they are not.

Pay close attention to the story here, it is about one man who fled the country and now suggests that his family depart as well. So what makes you think any such thing will actually happen? has there ever been a royal family that fled their own monarch?

MargueriteBee
13th June 2010, 02:47
Did you watch the 20/20 video? Anyway this is one I will keep up on.

Edit: I just like the idea of a bloodline family on the run.



http://www.hudson.org/files/publications/Henderson%20--%20Saudi%20Royal%20Family.pdf

The Saudi Royal Family: What Is Going On?
By Simon Henderson
The U.S.-Saudi relationship has historically been a very personal one. The Saudis are fond of
recalling the 1945 meeting between President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and King Abdul
Aziz (Ibn Saud) on board of the USS Quincy in the Suez Canal. Indeed, for some years,
whenever the ailing King Fahd has met official American visitors, the Saudi translator into
English has recalled this meeting whatever the king may or may not have actually mumbled.
The personal nature of the relationship has been emphasized in recent years by the open
access under successive US presidents to the White House held by the long-serving Saudi
ambassador in Washington DC, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, a nephew of King Fahd.
Yet the relationship is souring rapidly and this is not just a reflection of the aftermath of the
terror attacks of September 11, 2001, although these events were important. The reasons are
complicated and can be confusing, particularly because apologists for Saudi Arabia regularly
note the supposed efforts of the Saudi royal family to normalise relations – and blame any
real or apparent difficulty on detractors of the kingdom.

Grizzom
13th June 2010, 04:20
So what makes you think any such thing will actually happen? has there ever been a royal family that fled their own monarch?



"Does any of this ring a bell"


http://i45.tinypic.com/15wj4ls.jpg


Marie Antoinette was the queen of France at the outbreak of the French Revolution (1787–99)

Her extravagant lifestyle, which included lavish parties and expensive clothes and jewelry, made her unpopular with most French citizens. When the king was overthrown, Marie Antoinette was put in jail and eventually beheaded.

In the summer of 1788 France was having an economic crisis. Louis XVI yielded to pressure and assembled the Estates General, which was a governmental body that represented France's three Estates—the nobles, the church, and the French common people. Marie Antoinette agreed to the return of Jacques Necker (1732–1804) as chief minister and to granting the Third Estate, which represented the commoners, as many representatives as the other two Estates combined. However, after such events as the taking of the Bastille on July 14, 1789 (French citizens overran a Paris prison and took the weapons stored there), Marie Antoinette supported the conservative court faction that insisted on keeping the royal family in power.

On October 1, 1789, the queen attended a banquet at Versailles, France, during which the French Revolution was attacked and insulted. A few days later (October 4–5) a Parisian crowd forced the royal court to move to Paris, where they could control it more easily. Marie Antoinette's role in the efforts of the monarchy to work with such moderates as the Comte de Mirabeau (1749–1791) and later with the constitutional monarchist A. P. Barnave (1761–1793) is unclear. But it appears that she lacked confidence in them.

On June 21, 1791, the king and queen were captured at Varennes (a border town in France) after trying to escape.

Convinced that only foreign assistance could save the monarchy, the queen sought the aid of her brother, the Holy Roman emperor Leopold II (1747–1792). At this time, many French military officers left the country. Thinking that France would be easily defeated, she favored a declaration of war against Austria in April 1792. On August 10, 1792, a Paris crowd stormed the Tuileries Palace and ended the monarchy.

The queen is dead
On August 13, 1792, Marie Antoinette began a captivity that was to end only with her death. She was jailed in various Parisian prisons. After a number of unsuccessful attempts to escape, Marie Antoinette appeared before the Revolutionary Tribunal. She was charged with aiding the enemy and inciting civil war within France. The tribunal found her guilty and condemned her to death. On October 16, 1793, she went to the guillotine. (The guillotine was a machine used during the French Revolution to execute people by beheading them.) Marie Antoinette aroused sympathy by her dignity and courage in prison and before the executioner.

Majorion
13th June 2010, 04:57
"Does any of this ring a bell"
A revolution or a civil uproar that 'forces' the royalty fleeing for help is not quite the same as suggesting a royal family 'willingly' leave behind their land to its people.

Rocky_Shorz
13th June 2010, 05:12
Saudi Arabia is one of the 55 countries that Iran has taken power in.

The true Islam began in Mecca, and the brother of the prophet Ali ran to Iran and started a new religion, taking the teachings of the prohet Mohammed but expanding it far beyond by allowing 11 Clerics to write it's holy words as if they were prophets themselves.

Those Clerics fulfilled the prophesies of a coming false prophet that would lead the world to destruction.

Well we are entering the end time battles and the Jews and Christians are not even a part of the battle, the final struggle will be between the 2 branches of Islam.

Iran is the ram that had it's horns tangled with the Bush...

Saudi Arabia is the white goat meant to ride in breaking the horns from the rams head allowing the world to finally move towards peace.

The Royal family must be protected from Iran...

I am calling every true Muslim to stand up for the guardians of Mecca...

Northern Boy
13th June 2010, 05:35
A revolution or a civil uproar that 'forces' the royalty fleeing for help is not quite the same as suggesting a royal family 'willingly' leave behind their land to its people.

Perhaps the fact that the Saudi`s are going to allow the Israeli`s to use Saudi airspace for a strike on Iran to shorten the distance Israeli planes have to fly. Lots going on in the news one just has to find it

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7148555.ece

we are beginning to see lots of Talk about entitlement programs being Filleted or cut to reduce Governmental costs, Economists are predicting Greece to default on its Aug payment , japan has come out saying they may default , Bernanke has come out swinging and saying entitlements programs must be cut, but They never mention pay reduction for the big guys writing the cheques or the bloated military LOL heads are going to roll , The Bilderberg meeting showed the elite are scared they will become hunted and their family s executed because of what has been happening through out history , The tables are turning folks who is living in fear now LOL myself I personally forgive all the bozo`s for what they have done but here are going to be lots that won`t and I`m not about to go around playing sheriff when they decide to go on a hunting spree

Northern Boy
13th June 2010, 05:39
The Royal family must be protected from Iran...

LOL protect them if you must but not me I`m just a spectator watching the game play out

MargueriteBee
13th June 2010, 09:45
I would be happy with prison for life. I've worked in a prison it is not fun. More like hell. And I mean a real prison.

Edit: Something like Pelican Bay State Prison up in Crescent City, California. I've had a tour.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelican_Bay_State_Prison

I don't want them to die that would be the easy way out. Prison for life is much worse. Let them pay back that negative karma now. Oh yeah, and give them life extending drugs, etc. Me bad.:p

Majorion
13th June 2010, 16:46
Perhaps the fact that the Saudi`s are going to allow the Israeli`s to use Saudi airspace
It isn't fact, just a rumor...


Riyadh denied the British report on Saturday, calling it "false" and "slanderous," the official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) reported.

"Saudi Arabia has followed the false and slanderous allegations reported by some British media that it would let Israel attack Iran via its airspace," SPA quoted a foreign ministry official as saying.

The kingdom "rejects violating its sovereignty or the use of its airspace or territories by anyone to attack any country," the unidentified official said, noting that Saudi Arabia does not have diplomatic ties with the Jewish state.http://www.france24.com/en/20100612-saudis-test-clearing-skies-israel-bomb-iran-report

The Times are apparently the only known source of this report;


Riad Kahwaji, General Director of the Dubai-based Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis, said the "[Times] report, in my opinion, is part of the psychological warfare between Iran and the US, because there is no need for Saudi-Israeli cooperation to allow the Jewish state to attack Iran."http://gulfnews.com/news/region/iran/gulf-states-not-to-back-attack-against-iran-1.640331