PDA

View Full Version : White House Admits Bin Laden Wasn't Involved in 911



kathymarie
14th September 2011, 00:09
...listen then answer...why the assassination?

G2xRLiRqb8M

dreamer
14th September 2011, 00:21
in the beginning the host said Saddam, sounds like it's just a slip of the tongue honestly... All the things he references are clearly to Saddam, think this is a case of slip of the tongue, I do it alot too..

kathymarie
14th September 2011, 01:29
...dreamer...the video with this post is actually included on the "lighter side" forum here...Dick Cheney is messing up mixing up Saddam Hussein and Bin Ladin...it's laughable. Bottom line for me, though, is I don't believe Bin Ladin was the mastermind behind the attack unless he was still a CIA/NSA shill.

ThePythonicCow
14th September 2011, 02:12
...dreamer...the video with this post is actually included on the "lighter side" forum here...Dick Cheney is messing up mixing up Saddam Hussein and Bin Ladin...it's laughable. Bottom line for me, though, is I don't believe Bin Ladin was the mastermind behind the attack unless he was still a CIA/NSA shill.

Yup - indeed - see the last video in Cidersomerset's post, here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?30102-1-Charles...2-Edward...3-..........-Time-s-the-charm&p=306061&viewfull=1#post306061). This one:vcDnJyc6-vo.

Davidallany
14th September 2011, 02:27
WS5AYQX1m6c
Iraq was said to harbor terrorists responsible for 9/11 and have WMDs. There were only 20 million exhausted Iraqis after 8years of war with Iran and economic sanctions, higher percentage of women, children and old people.
w1_OJv6-YCw
Gy2oC1n0P1k
The gifts of US government to Iraqies, of freedom and rebuilding.
13h_75t4cj8
XjIdjwGemNI

What are you doing soldiers for governments in the name of nationalism!!

dreamer
14th September 2011, 03:05
Man it's just frustrating, there are so many posts that say "proof " this and " so and so admits " that, it gets frustrating when it never really lives up to "proof" as I see it, mabey it's just personal opinion. Also, I guess I diddnt know that this was also on a lighter side forum as well..

sygh
14th September 2011, 03:35
Very tough to watch. I hear, I see, I wonder. What I wonder most is, in a country rich in oil reserves, why are the streets so poor? Is this but one section, one area? Is this like our slums, or is this something else? If there is no profit for the people in the streets, who does profit?

Lord Sidious
14th September 2011, 04:34
As you would know David, Al Iraq had the highest standard of living in the middle east and most things such as health and education were free.
They were of a very high standard as well.
I would say it is shameful what the corporations have done, but it is way worse than that.
They say saddam was a bad man, but look at the people who took him down for a comparison.
I would have swapped places back then, if I had a chance.

Davidallany
14th September 2011, 06:25
I would have swapped places back then, if I had a chance
I would too my Lord. I think that a lot of Americans have no clue to this day about what their military has done to Iraq. They still don't comprehend the damage done, the infrastructure was bombed to the dark ages, 500,000 civilians lives snuffed out, so many orphans are left to fend for themselves. The US still controls Iraq on behalf of someone else and soon Lybia will follow.
One day soon soldiers will come to their senses and quit helping terrorist and nazi regimes all over the world.

ktlight
14th September 2011, 07:41
I would have swapped places back then, if I had a chance
I would too my Lord. I think that a lot of Americans have no clue to this day about what their military has done to Iraq. They still don't comprehend the damage done, the infrastructure was bombed to the dark ages, 500,000 civilians lives snuffed out, so many orphans are left to fend for themselves. The US still controls Iraq on behalf of someone else and soon Lybia will follow.
One day soon soldiers will come to their senses and quit helping terrorist and nazi regimes all over the world.

They need to see the outcome that has affected the birth of multitudes of deformed babies due to depleted uranium. It would shock them to the core.

Davidallany
14th September 2011, 08:04
They need to see the outcome that has affected the birth of multitudes of deformed babies due to depleted uranium. It would shock them to the core.If only more moms and sisters talk some sense into their soldier sons and brothers. Women can do it. They know how to deal with men and get into their thick skulls. I have a feeling that women will play a major role in the coming days and months, but ultimately it is the soldiers that have to wake up.

Mad Hatter
14th September 2011, 09:42
Mad Hatter dons his lateral thinking cap and ponders...

To answer the OP's original question where is the proof Bin Laden was the one assasinated?? Like evidence for CAGW I haven't seen any yet...

OT - Considering the current penchant by TPTW for bombing well developed oil rich nations back into the stone age the cynic in me wonders if this is not a deliberate ploy prior to the release of ZPE thus ensuring no oil dollar$ available for re building!!

I also wonder how the widespread use of depleted uranium ordinance is not classified as a weapon of mass destruction thus seeing those responsible for deploying them automatically found guilty of war crimes.

I suppose it goes to show the power of that weapon of mass deception otherwise known as the mainstream media...

Atlas
28th July 2013, 21:00
Please tell me these photos are faked :

22148

22149