David Wilcock- The Source Field

[Sesan]

I just received my copy of David Wilcocks new book- The Source Field. What a fantastic book so far. David has really done his homework and has included tons of scientific data to substantiate his ideas. I'm only four chapters into it and can't wait to finish it.

I'd love to hear what everyone thinks about this book, and the idea of a source field.
Cheers!
Sesan
:cool:

[Meesh]

I am in the middle of reading it. I agree; his sources are very well documented. I'm enjoying it too.

[Nortreb]

I am also in the middle of reading it! Based on my research and travels, David has put a lot of lost pieces to a very large puzzle! Great work!

All my best energies to everyone!
Nortreb

[Sesan]

Ok....can't say enough about this book. Really, really great stuff! I highly recommend this to everyone. David has included a massive amount of scientific data to support his ideas. A easy book to follow and well worth your time.
Cheers!
Sesan

[Calz]

Must be another thread ... thought I already responded to this.

DW is best when bringing forth this information. It is his strength. He takes information from various quarters and presents it in a fashion that we can all assimilate.

Really important stuff here folks.

[Corncrake]

Yes, I agree with all the positive reviews expressed here. I am only half way through reading it and while it is very interesting and relatively easy to follow I still find some of the science hard to get my head around. However, this is probably due to my lack of a science education. :( Wilcock pulls together material from diverse sources - some scientific and some metaphysical and the book is very well annotated too. While I am able to take on board of lot of his research I still struggle with certain aspects of it - some of his interpretations of symbols require quite a leap of faith. Above all though I love his positivity and his fresh enthusiasm which come through strongly in this book.

[Sesan]

Yes his positive approach is very refreshing. No fear mongering.

[CivilDawn]

I'm up to the chapter where he unravels a good part of his research about the Great Pyramid. Interesting info about hypnosis, our minds and prophecies. I'm anticipating the section about Time and Space.

[Sesan]

I'm at the time & space section and I am still trying to get my head around it, deep stuff. Time to pour a glass of red, put another log on the fire, and dig back into it. And nothing about any killer comets! Go figure.....haha!

[CivilDawn]

I'm at the time & space section and I am still trying to get my head around it, deep stuff.!

I've heard him talk before about Space/Time, which is an inversion of Time/Space, where Time carries three dimensions (forwards, backwards, and sideways). I think I'm gonna need to read that one a few times.

[nearing]

Is there an ebook version?

[Sesan]

Is there an ebook version?

Hello Nearing. Yes I believe there is an ebook version available. Check David's web site www.divinecosmos.com. You should find it there. I bought my hard cover on Amazon for arounf $30.00. A very nice addition to my book shelf.
I'd love to hear what you think about it.
Cheers!
Sesan

[sirac]

whats the practical about ...this inversion time space
time carrying forward backward and sideways?
how would you summarize the imperative....i know the general approach might be to make aware, and calm people in the flow of it. but is there an essential mechanistic

[apokalypse]

The Source Field is a great book and well researched based on scientific facts. i'm shock there's so many thing that Mainstream Science and academic didn't talk about.

[jcocks]

Is there an ebook version?

There most definitely is. Grab a copy of the kindle reader for your computer of choice, head over to Amazon.com, and you can grab the ebook for about 10 bucks or so...

[Sesan]

I have to say I am somewhat perplexed that there isn't much more discussion about this book here at Avalon. I thought this would be a huge hit with the membership. Like David or not, this book touches on many, many topics discussed here in the threads.

Bill if you have read it, I'd love to hear what you think about it!
Sesan
:confused:

[danceblackcatdance]

Greetings, this is my first post here and this is one of the topics I have been searching for since I found the forum. I read this book last year and concur with previous posters positive reviews of the material, an abundance of info and really key stuff is presented. If only half of it is true, its not only incredibly ground breaking data, but the world / reality the majority believe we inhabit is a total fiction indoctrinated is us from birth...

I also second what Sesan has posted and I am also surprised that there isn't more discussion of this book here :)

Have a nice weekend all...

[9eagle9]

Why is it more important when David Wilcocks discusses it rather then when the 20 or more forum members who are aware of this phenom and discuss it weekly. Or when the greater percentage of forum members discuss this phenom even though they are not quite conscious of the fact they are doing it.

Why are David Wilcocks proponents over in the Divine Cosmos devising a plan to a machine to 'detect' source fields when they are created, communicated through, and maintained by the entities on this planet in part? That we entities are the ones who detect source fields .

You would think a psychic would know that. That a machine is never going to have the ability to create anything but a limited electrogmagnetic distortion field.
Lol.

David Wilcocks: "I discovered the wheel!"

I really didn't think we needed another source of dumb but apparently we do.

Ground breaking....not.



Must be another thread ... thought I already responded to this.

DW is best when bringing forth this information. It is his strength. He takes information from various quarters and presents it in a fashion that we can all assimilate.

Really important stuff here folks.

[we-R-one]

Why is it more important when David Wilcocks discusses it rather then when the 20 or more forum members who are aware of this phenom and discuss it weekly. Or when the greater percentage of forum members discuss this phenom even though they are not quite conscious of the fact they are doing it.

Nobody is saying it's more important and forum members on here aren't necessarily reaching the masses like David. I found DW before I found Avalon. This is not a put down on Avalon by any means, but not everyone is going to access Avalon to get their information and even if they did, how on earth would you be able to weed through all the threads to find the information? DW provides a well thought out and organized version of scientific studies in a one-stop-shop book for those who seek to find this kind of information IMO. It doesn't matter if the studies have all ready been out there.....not all of us know or have the time to find these studies. Sometimes it takes someone different to come along and present the information in a new format to grab the attention of viewers who might have originally missed the studies.

Why are David Wilcocks proponents over in the Divine Cosmos devising a plan to a machine to 'detect' source fields when they are created, communicated through, and maintained by the entities on this planet in part? That we entities are the ones who detect source fields .

You would think a psychic would know that. That a machine is never going to have the ability to create anything but a limited electrogmagnetic distortion field.
Lol.

David Wilcocks: "I discovered the wheel!"

I really didn't think we needed another source of dumb but apparently we do.

Ground breaking....not.

Maybe you're at a different level of knowledge than some of us, eh? We can't all be at the same level so in that, David serves a purpose. His book helped me tremendously. Though I have always known and accessed Source Field at times, I was missing the how and why part of it. DW gave me the vocabulary and the studies to back what I all ready knew existed. His worked offered us a frame of reference that we didn't have before and for that I am extremely grateful.


See my answers in blue. I have to agree with the other posters, I'm surprised more don't talk about his work. He offers the reader something tangible that one can see for proof with their own eyes, for an energy field that's not necessarily viewable with the naked eye if that makes sense. I think David should be commended for his work, sorry, but that's how I feel.

[9eagle9]

David has a personal weak field and that in turns draws other of similar field quality. It' s easily read because of its low vibrational quality but that is what people want.

Disinformation and 'having a little knowledge' about something is still disinfo and 'a little knowledge' no matter how well organized it is.

Granted his research on auto hypnosis (from other sources, not by his observations) was good but he doesn't follow or express his own advice and neither does his fans.

The more I hear from him the denser he becomes. The more he talks the denser his fan base grows. Lights out .

He is easily manipulated; that is observable.

How?

By the very subject matter he professes to be an so well informed about.

Now the mass embrasure of a topic he clearly doesn't express for himself leaves his adherents to manipulation as well.

What a hero.

[we-R-one]

Sorry your post makes no sense to me. Guess I from that weak field too......sigh. I'm glad someone else is more enlightened. Thanks for pulling up this thread, it gave me an opportunity to thank David for his work.

[danceblackcatdance]

Why is it more important when David Wilcocks discusses it rather then when the 20 or more forum members who are aware of this phenom and discuss it weekly. Or when the greater percentage of forum members discuss this phenom even though they are not quite conscious of the fact they are doing it.

Why are David Wilcocks proponents over in the Divine Cosmos devising a plan to a machine to 'detect' source fields when they are created, communicated through, and maintained by the entities on this planet in part? That we entities are the ones who detect source fields .

You would think a psychic would know that. That a machine is never going to have the ability to create anything but a limited electrogmagnetic distortion field.
Lol.

David Wilcocks: "I discovered the wheel!"

I really didn't think we needed another source of dumb but apparently we do.

Ground breaking....not.



Hello 9eagle9 :)

To be clear I'm not an ardent DW disciple in any way, but am interested in the data and have to agree with we-R-one.

The book is a compendium of suppressed historical and scientific information that is now in the public domain (was a NY Times Bestseller etc) this forum is not, nor is it ordered in a comprehensive way and so doesn't reach the masses, who (we might agree) need to be made aware so that global consciousness may shift up a gear... and imo that is more important than it being discussed on a closed circuit.

I had no idea that there was a plan for a machine to detect source fields and can't see the point of that, but that is certainly not what the book is about... he's not claiming to have discovered the wheel in the book but presenting a massive piece of fact based research and asking people to draw their own conclusions.

The more people that learn that public knowledge of Earth's history and science has been manipulated by the system to the detriment of human kind the better in my mind...

He should be commended for his work :cool:

[9eagle9]

Oh its HIS data, now is it?

lol.

[Sesan]

As the original poster of this thread, I have to say that your comments have me somewhat confused 9eagle9. I had no intent on offending anyone here on Avalon?? I found the book very interesting and wanted to hear from others who felt the same. You obviously are a DW basher and I do not agree with your comments. Perhaps you should find a thread that you agree with and participate there. Please don't attack others for discussing theirs. Isn't that what Avalon is supposed to be, a place to find others with similar interests and to promote enjoyable discussion? DW has put a great deal of effort into this work and I thank him for that.
Sesan

[9eagle9]

David's work is a monument to his ego. He doesn't mind mis-representing and peddling that which he cannot do for himself. And you don't mind accepting it for the same reason he peddles it.

David's is a deeply insecure man and he's easily manipulated.

. Of course you want to hear what you want to hear. You don't care if it's bull**** or that the author himself clearly doesn't understand what he's talking about. You want agreement. As if agreement would change distortion to truth.

He needs your agreement to do this.

I'm glad you think the material is interesting you. How is it serving you. How is demonstrated and expressed in your own life? I can write a cook book, plagiarizing a thousand recipes and twisting them to suit my tastes. But that doesn't mean I'm a chef. Or even know how to cook.

Humans have in part very basic fields. Emotional, mental and physical. Weak fields are very obvious. If David makes a convincing argeument that he an expert in fields perhaps no one will see how weak his fields are.

"My mental and emotional fields tell me that I am of such importance to mask an essential insecurity within the field, that when someone prankishly informs me that perhaps I am not as great as I think, and may even kill me, I immediately react in fear, my insecurity is provoked, and I must rush and get the agreement of many others to re-establish how great I am.

Never pausing to understand that someone has levered my field of which I proclaim vast understanding of.

This field which is underpinned by a deep insecurity has long been masked by not accepting who I am. I prefer to assume the identity of someone else who I perceive is great. This field attracts others , energy is attractive, that also has deep insecurity. They reinforce my field to allow me to keep re-establishing who I tell myself that I am"

Field investigations. Any can do them.


As the original poster of this thread, I have to say that your comments have me somewhat confused 9eagle9. I had no intent on offending anyone here on Avalon?? I found the book very interesting and wanted to hear from others who felt the same. You obviously are a DW basher and I do not agree with your comments. Perhaps you should find a thread that you agree with and participate there. Please don't attack others for discussing theirs. Isn't that what Avalon is supposed to be, a place to find others with similar interests and to promote enjoyable discussion? DW has put a great deal of effort into this work and I thank him for that.
Sesan

[we-R-one]

And your ideals are the moral authority because??? I'm trying real hard to appreciate your posts, but you come across to me that you think your thought process is better than everyone else. Maybe that's not your intention, but I see a pattern in your presentation of comments on other threads. I don't see the respect for other posters viewpoints. If we listen to what you're saying, than aren't we doing the same thing you said we were doing by listening to David? Than that would make your comments a monument to your ego would it not? Though a difference in opinion is welcome it's all in the presentation.

I have no interest in wasting time getting in a pissing match with you, but when I read your comments I wonder if you take your own advice? I think if you did, you might not state your viewpoint in the manner that you do and the ego would be less pronounced. Often people who nitpick others, and try and discredit their work, have there own insecurities which is why they nitpick.

Now I'm sure you have some very intellegent things to say, but I will have a hard time listening to your messages due to the manner in which you choose to lay out your case as it's not soft to the eyes. I think your viewpoint would be better received if the arrogance in your writing was toned down a bit.

[we-R-one]

And since this book is so terrible...... I decided I'm going to read it again today and re-enforce my weakend sourcefield. Maybe we can discuss some of the viewpoints at length if anyone is interested? Since I can't think for myself, I might as well continue operating in that lower frequency......anyone care to join me?

[danceblackcatdance]

well said we-R-one :cool:


Oh its HIS data, now is it?

lol.

who said HIS data?

THE data...

and you're missing the point :)

the goal of raising consciousness to a level where we shake off the enslaving paradigm of ignorance a global.. yes its down to individuals to do their part but we will move forward as a whole.

the cookbook analogy is useful... if one had collated and even plagiarised actual recipes (not theories) which were advantageous to humanity perhaps.. let's say lesser known / lost beneficial recipes that explain why certain advocated modern foods are actually bad / how you can achieve longevity or more clarity etc by an alternative means.. and that goes out into the public domain for the benefit of the majority... well, thats good in my book. it might not make you a cook, but it does make you an excellent researcher who is actually doing something for the greater good.

btw this is NOT about DW as a person but the information he has gathered and published - you misunderstand the contents of the book, there is no misrepresentation or 'peddling that which he cannot do himself' there - its a scientific fact based journal as far as I am concerned and as previous posters have already said 'the data' is very well researched and backed by references... its also out there challenging the preconceived notions of science, religion, history and its a best seller, this means many more people are waking up and beginning to realise there IS more than one way.

9eagle9, when you write a well researched book as such and so reach many thousands of people let me know, because I would be interested to read :D

meanwhile, with deepest apologies in advance if this seems a bit forward or rude; why don't you respect the OP's request and leave the thread alone, you obviously haven't read the book or got anything positive to contribute at this time

:)

[Carmody]

David's work is a monument to his ego. He doesn't mind mis-representing and peddling that which he cannot do for himself. And you don't mind accepting it for the same reason he peddles it.

David's is a deeply insecure man and he's easily manipulated.

. Of course you want to hear what you want to hear. You don't care if it's bull**** or that the author himself clearly doesn't understand what he's talking about. You want agreement. As if agreement would change distortion to truth.

He needs your agreement to do this.

I'm glad you think the material is interesting you. How is it serving you. How is demonstrated and expressed in your own life? I can write a cook book, plagiarizing a thousand recipes and twisting them to suit my tastes. But that doesn't mean I'm a chef. Or even know how to cook.

Humans have in part very basic fields. Emotional, mental and physical. Weak fields are very obvious. If David makes a convincing argeument that he an expert in fields perhaps no one will see how weak his fields are.

"My mental and emotional fields tell me that I am of such importance to mask an essential insecurity within the field, that when someone prankishly informs me that perhaps I am not as great as I think, and may even kill me, I immediately react in fear, my insecurity is provoked, and I must rush and get the agreement of many others to re-establish how great I am.

Never pausing to understand that someone has levered my field of which I proclaim vast understanding of.

This field which is underpinned by a deep insecurity has long been masked by not accepting who I am. I prefer to assume the identity of someone else who I perceive is great. This field attracts others , energy is attractive, that also has deep insecurity. They reinforce my field to allow me to keep re-establishing who I tell myself that I am"

Field investigations. Any can do them.


As the original poster of this thread, I have to say that your comments have me somewhat confused 9eagle9. I had no intent on offending anyone here on Avalon?? I found the book very interesting and wanted to hear from others who felt the same. You obviously are a DW basher and I do not agree with your comments. Perhaps you should find a thread that you agree with and participate there. Please don't attack others for discussing theirs. Isn't that what Avalon is supposed to be, a place to find others with similar interests and to promote enjoyable discussion? DW has put a great deal of effort into this work and I thank him for that.
Sesan

Do you need to be slapped off your ego and issue hobby horse?

The book is an excellent and important book.

Let it go.

Please, do you and the world a favor. Find another thread to contribute in, if you can't be constructive.

[9eagle9]

Well start a thread Carmody to slap me off my ego, and hobby horse, okay? If you think are the chosen one to do so.




David's work is a monument to his ego. He doesn't mind mis-representing and peddling that which he cannot do for himself. And you don't mind accepting it for the same reason he peddles it.

David's is a deeply insecure man and he's easily manipulated.

. Of course you want to hear what you want to hear. You don't care if it's bull**** or that the author himself clearly doesn't understand what he's talking about. You want agreement. As if agreement would change distortion to truth.

He needs your agreement to do this.

I'm glad you think the material is interesting you. How is it serving you. How is demonstrated and expressed in your own life? I can write a cook book, plagiarizing a thousand recipes and twisting them to suit my tastes. But that doesn't mean I'm a chef. Or even know how to cook.

Humans have in part very basic fields. Emotional, mental and physical. Weak fields are very obvious. If David makes a convincing argeument that he an expert in fields perhaps no one will see how weak his fields are.

"My mental and emotional fields tell me that I am of such importance to mask an essential insecurity within the field, that when someone prankishly informs me that perhaps I am not as great as I think, and may even kill me, I immediately react in fear, my insecurity is provoked, and I must rush and get the agreement of many others to re-establish how great I am.

Never pausing to understand that someone has levered my field of which I proclaim vast understanding of.

This field which is underpinned by a deep insecurity has long been masked by not accepting who I am. I prefer to assume the identity of someone else who I perceive is great. This field attracts others , energy is attractive, that also has deep insecurity. They reinforce my field to allow me to keep re-establishing who I tell myself that I am"

Field investigations. Any can do them.


As the original poster of this thread, I have to say that your comments have me somewhat confused 9eagle9. I had no intent on offending anyone here on Avalon?? I found the book very interesting and wanted to hear from others who felt the same. You obviously are a DW basher and I do not agree with your comments. Perhaps you should find a thread that you agree with and participate there. Please don't attack others for discussing theirs. Isn't that what Avalon is supposed to be, a place to find others with similar interests and to promote enjoyable discussion? DW has put a great deal of effort into this work and I thank him for that.
Sesan

Do you need to be slapped off your ego and issue hobby horse?

The book is an excellent and important book.

Let it go.

Please, do you and the world a favor. Find another thread to contribute in, if you can't be constructive.

[ThePythonicCow]

When views on a thread become too conflicting to fit comfortably in one thread, I sometimes split the thread into two, to see if that fares better.

This thread has such potential :).

[Mozart]

David's work is a monument to his ego. He doesn't mind mis-representing and peddling that which he cannot do for himself. And you don't mind accepting it for the same reason he peddles it.




Huh? I call bull**** on this, dude.





David's is a deeply insecure man and he's easily manipulated.




Surely you jest. I've never jumped on got on anybody's case in this forum yet, but you are the first one, as I had to respond to this tripe of yours. You clearly have an agenda against David. How much are you paid for this ****, man?


And you state that, based on what? Do you know the guy? I've personally known David for 13 years, man, and he's NOT insecure, nor easily manipulated! He's grown into a very confident and strong man, secure in his own personal accomplishments, along with a solid foundation of a finely-woven blending of science and spirit that weaves together an amazingly-cogent tapestry of explanations of life as we know it.


I've personally watched him grow up, to transcend his own limitations -- one after another -- and grow into the leader that he is now. What you, 9eagle9 is saying is pure bull**** and pulled out of your ass, man. Period.





I'm glad you think the material is interesting you. How is it serving you. How is demonstrated and expressed in your own life? I can write a cook book, plagiarizing a thousand recipes and twisting them to suit my tastes. But that doesn't mean I'm a chef. Or even know how to cook.

<snip>

Field investigations. Any can do them.




Oh, really? So anyone can do up a book like David can? Hmmm, how about you? Can you work up a paradigm-busting and creating book like David's Source Field Investigations? Hmm?


That book is totally awesome in the weaving together the many threads of information/data that have been discovered by the many brilliant minds out there, so with full credit to each discoverer/inventor, the threads of information weave together to create a cogent force field of positive information with which one can use to understand the reality in which they find themselves and to start to pierce the mysteries of life as we know it.


It's an absolutely brilliant book.


So go ahead, 9eagle9, write up a book like the Source Field Investigations ... you couldn't do one in a 100 years, let alone two years like David did.


~Mozart